Рет қаралды 17,852
This is a comparison of FP4+ to Tri-X. I chose Tri-X to serve as a general measuring stick to other films simply because of it’s wide popularity, I do not think it is a superior film to any other. All films in this series were exposed at box speed, processed in D-76 stock for the manufacturer’s published times, then printed to the same contrast and time. The purpose is to see if there are any differences and what they might be, not to name one film better than another.
In this specific comparison, both performed well at box speed and had a full range of tones when processed in this basic manner. Tri-X displayed more grain, as expected of a faster film, but the mid tones separated differently between films, though overall contrast range was the same.
Channel Merch, Discord, and more:
linktr.ee/The_...
Music by Hooksounds: www.hooksounds...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thenakedphotographer