Critical Thinking: How to Think for Yourself

[@metamorphosis_77]

🧠 Invest in yourself! Use my link and check out the first chapter of any Datacamp course for FREE: bit.ly/35KydMK

[@1995yuda]

Critical Thinking is borderline impossible to teach, yet it is perhaps the most potent cure to human suffering outside of direct spiritual experiences. Very good subject for a video essay, I'm impressed.

[@metamorphosis_77]

thank you :)

[@Prymistic]

I hate when people say something wrong confidently and I end up looking stupid because I can't come with facts.

[@askjcs]

starting at 350 BC ....I like it already 👍

[@metamorphosis_77]

good old days

[@soundsandmusic.3689]

I truly enjoyed this one. It brought me back to the first question I asked myself in order to find out the truth. “I how do I know that what I know is the truth “? That datacamp sounds like a good tool to use to sharpen my critical thinking. Might have to try it.

[@metamorphosis_77]

It's the best platform out there. Game changer.

[@AConcernedCitizen420]

I’ve heard it said that language was created in order to lie. And the druids of old say that we were able to read each other and understand each other before spoken language, and even communicate with each other across vast distances.

[@marillion4th393]

Hello there! Can you please tell me where can I find that information? I would like to know more on that thanks!

[@tbk_sed4946]

Same I need information on that

[@Prymistic]

Same

[@RigoVids]

9:00 little vocabulary tip, the better word to use there would probably be ingrain rather than entrance. Entrance has a meaning closer to “hypnotize” or to fool the mind, whereas ingrain is to repeatedly use until it is second nature. It’s cool to see someone with English as a second language speaking so fluently, but since you preach the gospel of always learning more, I thought I would drop that little vocab lesson for you :)

[@metamorphosis_77]

It's entrench not entrance. But yeah ingrain is also great.

[@spitpiloot]

Fantastic video! The world is in desperate need of this more than ever!! Thank you so much for this Adrian!!

[@elazarbandman3981]

Gave the like for the gratitude i have towards u for putting the ad at the end- real smotth man!!

[@JumpRopeVeteran]

Excellent video. Nassim Taleb writes about the dangers of inductive reasoning (The Turkey Problem) in Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan.

[@themistoklisiliopoulos2113]

Very good, critical thinking is the cornstone of human relations.

[@HigoWapsico]

Another great video, you make it look easy! Alain de button, oui. Sam Harris, non. I would challenge your statement “truth is logic.” Not always. I got a lot of truth on certain “journeys” but they were far from logical...

[@lucasmoreira3237]

Excellent video. Thank you.

[@deltadakid]

You deserve more than this. Thank you

[@shivanshgarewal2833]

I don't know why but I love his Accent

[@bedward6852]

The argument example : sounds very similar to the arguments used against vivek ramaswamy

[@YeS1711]

Great video! This could be a series like "critical thinking as seen in (insert philosophy school)" Start with stoicism! ;)

[@metamorphosis_77]

I like it!

[@tbland702]

Great video. I learned a lot. Thank you!

[@rudibotha3947]

Please share , this is powerful stuff 🔥

[@metamorphosis_77]

🔥🔥

[@rudibotha3947]

Thanks for your energy, knowledge and deep insight into this topic, very educational. 🎭

[@dalbugger1392]

Hidden gem.

[@bnb7094]

Great Video ! Could you do one on explaining How (responsibility ownership authority) are interconnected? That you cannot have one without the others? That the Self-Governing individual person who has their overall goal to be "Living a happy life while allowing all others to do the same" will already obey just laws and fight unjust laws according to that goal? That blaming others is actually an act of abdicating a portion of individual responsibility in which that individual feels like a victim, prisoner, and slave to those they have blamed? That to be truly free one must take on all the responsibilities that promote them having a happy life through creating their own conscious joys? Thank you either way :)

[@victoriaandersag5642]

Keep up the good work!

[@MrSilver2nd]

Spoken like a single man 😄 Isn't it interesting that most of the great minds of the past where or are at least presumed to be single? Εκτιμώ το φως που λάμπεις σε αυτήν τη βαθιά σκοτεινή σπηλαιώδη κοιλάδα του θανάτου, γνωστή ως γάμος μου περιοδικά. μου θυμίζει τις μέρες που κάποτε μπορούσα να εκτελέσω ενάντια στο ελεύθερο πνεύμα σκέψης και τη θέλησή μου. Of course this is in jest for you to injest and possibly contemplate further. 😉Thank you for the video

[@metamorphosis_77]

How did you come up with that conclusion (that I am single)?

[@MrSilver2nd]

You still have all your hair and your face is void of any stress marks 😄 Lucky guess?

[@metamorphosis_77]

@@MrSilver2nd Haha. Can't really disclose anything.

[@MrSilver2nd]

Of course. And it's not necessary 🙂 Good journey!

[@cutflow2]

So are you saying all the brilliant men are single or do you have a different meaning

[@ramonalewis6050]

Every time I wash my car it rains 🌧 😑 Every time I try to plan something, something goes wrong Anything that can go wrong, will

[@EnriquePerez-up1ev]

very articulated can you do anarchy and or anarchism definition?

[@isaiahmelvin8727]

Great material ✊🏿

[@robertmaric9700]

Quality stuff, quality stuff...

[@metamorphosis_77]

🖤

[@DinoRamzi]

Excellent. I have not come across “argument, frame and eloquence” before. At first glance, I wondered if you would draw a connection to Logos, Pathos and Ethos. I found a couple of online essays but they are hardly explicit about your outline.

[@metamorphosis_77]

It is my equation. I state it in the video.

[@newname8988]

Great information and editing. 👍 If one applies critical thinking one could question the ‘truth is logic’ statement. What is truth? If justified deductive reasoning is to be applied, one will eventually reach the issue of axiom justification. Thus, ‘truth is logic’ could be refuted with logic. Given refutation could be reached by application of logic, truth is most likely not logic. As an example, 2+2 most likely cannot be justified to be 4, without the application of axioms. Application of unjustified axioms is most likely not logic. Therefore, truth most likely is distinct from logic. Would the above be satisfactory for your argument winning equation? Or do I lack framing and eloquence? Thank you for the content, due to the aiding of cognitive engagement.

[@metamorphosis_77]

You got me here. That was my personal commentary, so to speak, to emphasize the importance of logic in the pursuit of truth. I do such things sometimes in my videos, just to see who is going to notice.

[@radha_k710]

Very deep content

[@metamorphosis_77]

thank you :)

[@TCASpeaks]

Will you be available to mod for me tonight with my video with HH Holmes GG Grandson? My video is at 6p.m CST. I hope you can make it, I'm probably gonna need all the mods I can get! 😁

[@My-db8br]

2:25 If I'm going to be pedantic, this syllogism is invalid. P1: Bachelors are unmarried men You should say they are defined as such so that all unmarried men are bachelors. All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares. You must state it goes both ways. P2: Bill is unmarried You should state Bill is an unmarried *man* as they could just be a women with an unconventional name.

[@girayhakan]

hi, if you add english subtitle it would be more understandable for us.

[@CyberDrone0]

I wanted to say something but didn't wanna sound like an ahole. I couldn't understand him very well either

[@metamorphosis_77]

done

[@metamorphosis_77]

@@CyberDrone0 I usually upload them earlier. This time it took a bit more time than usual.

[@girayhakan]

@@metamorphosis_77 thank you .d

[@purumr]

Check Nyaya school of Indian philosophy, It predates Socrates.

[@metamorphosis_77]

Will do. Thanks.

[@benquinney2]

Certainty

[@Dennnis10B]

Question; Is common sense infinite...?

[@metamorphosis_77]

I don't understand what you mean by infinite, but it is universal.

[@benquinney2]

Socrates

[@stevenmonson5149]

Big bang theory hosabout ex nihilo nihil fit nothing comes out from nothing , so logic dictates something/someone i.e. God was always existing prior to the cosmos/universe/time/matter. That doses not conflicts with logic.

[@MrSilkor]

Yeah but nah

[@metamorphosis_77]

nah

[@MrSilkor]

@@metamorphosis_77 yea

[@wolfmations]

Ironic video title

[@duncanmurphy9762]

Theory of evolution is acceptable 😂😂😂😂