"There's No Going Back from This" James Webb Telescope Uncovers One of the Oldest Galaxies Ever Seen

Welcome to EYES 200M, your portal to captivating explorations in Space, Science, and Technology!
Within EYES 200M, our diverse team collaborates seamlessly, blending the skills of writers, voice actors, video editors, animation artists, and graphic designers. Each video undergoes an extensive journey, spanning days of meticulous crafting before it finds its place on KZbin for your enjoyment.
While our videos prioritize creativity and dedication, it's essential to understand that they are not crafted for academic citation or research purposes. Instead, they are tailored for pure entertainment, free from the confines of formal peer review. EYES 200M operates independently, distinct from any other KZbin channel.
We invite you to join our community of enthusiasts and stay updated on our latest releases by subscribing to our channel. Your support fuels our passion for exploration and creation.
Your feedback is invaluable to us. We eagerly anticipate your thoughts and comments on our content.

[@Space30MINUTES]

Thank you for your story....

[@iamboborilee]

Things just happened faster back then. Why is that so crazy.

[@andrewnorgrove6487]

Yes beyound14 billion years and fully formed will make for some serious rewriting , they say its expanding at colossal speeds But i always come back to thinking about the dropping of a single drop of oil in a large dish of water or another on the opposed side

[@peterpalumbo1963]

You should be sure the graphics and simulations are in sync with the voice.

[@oscarvilladolid]

Maybe there was no big bang.

[@stevenswitzer5154]

I believe Bangs happen. Our bang was not special or unique. THE big bang theory is just scientists trying to stay with the religious creation stories.

[@ManuelGarcia-ww7gj]

Has JWST detected any population III stars? No? Why not?

[@EYES200M]

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has not detected any Population III stars yet. It is still exploring the universe for such ancient stars.

[@ronaldkemp3952]

The JWST did find old stars producing elements like carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, iron and even nickel, in large galaxies further than 13.5 billion light-years away. (HD1), but didn't find any population 3 stars yet. It's because telescopes can't measure distant bodies as they looked in the past due to quantum entanglement of light. Telescopes measure distant bodies as they look today because their light information happens in a quantum instant. All the photons because they are entangled experience zero time and zero distance upon an observer looking. This is an observer effect. It's as if all the light particles are suspended in limbo, outside our reference frame of space, distance, matter and time until they are measured. Then the light information is conveyed instantly, regardless of the distance to the body being measured. the distant body looks old and mature because that's how it would look today, in our relative time. Remember, time is relative to the observer, nothing else. The telescope is the observer in the experiment. So time is relative to the telescope, not the distant galaxy. Telescopes cannot see into the past. Einstein's look-back time is flawed according to my interpretations of quantum field theory.

[@ManuelGarcia-ww7gj]

@@EYES200M And what might the absence of such srars say about Eddington’s work?

[@mamatoldem5331]

Not much even tho the web telescope is amazing we still have so much to see before we can draw conclusons​@@ManuelGarcia-ww7gj

[@peterpalumbo1963]

Reionization may have something to do with susy and susy breaking.

[@peterpalumbo1963]

Why do you do this?. Your title says what I want and when I turne in there is b.s, b.s, b.s., It is annoying to say the least!

[@ckset]

Why do you delete comments that you don't agree with!

[@Ezekiel903]

his title are misleading too!

[@torontobro]

Robotic voicing needs appropriate editing