I agree with you. Its just words and thoughts. There are some things we don't know.
@the-absolute-lightАй бұрын
@@mikejohn2307 🙏
@Evan-s7rАй бұрын
The closest we can get to nonduality is paradox because the universe is necessarily duality. Paradox is realizing the pivot between yes and no, conflicting perspectives reconciled.
@the-absolute-lightАй бұрын
@@Evan-s7r totally, it’s only a seeming paradox though. The Nondual appears as the dual. The dual isn’t exclusively real.
@Evan-s7rАй бұрын
@@the-absolute-light true but it seems so very effectively.
@Luke-oi4izАй бұрын
When you were created where you are a duality or singular? The duality is how they split the hemispheres of people. The middle... was one before 2?
@Evan-s7rАй бұрын
@@Luke-oi4iz it's only different terminology. We're attempting to convey the same idea. Even when the middle is the same, the perspectives come from different angles. The one has divided itself for the purpose of objects, duality. Non-duality is within reach but beyond grasp.
@dougiecrowford2996Ай бұрын
At _tension ❤
@twinkle-taraАй бұрын
I consider non duality as 0.
@tejarexАй бұрын
Your syllables are like blips on a background of silence.
@the-absolute-lightАй бұрын
@@tejarex sounds poetic
@Luke-oi4izАй бұрын
I think Krisnamurti would disagree.
@the-absolute-lightАй бұрын
@@Luke-oi4iz it’s ok to disagree
@Luke-oi4izАй бұрын
If all, always vibrates where is the silence?
@the-absolute-lightАй бұрын
@@Luke-oi4iz silence isn’t a ‘thing’ that would compete for a space with the vibrations. You’re thinking of silence as a form. It is the formlessness, which doesn’t appear to occupy space.
@Luke-oi4izАй бұрын
@@the-absolute-light yeah silence would be the absence of the thing. All vibrates, there is no absence of the thing. Just more thing. Infinite.