SpaceX And NASA Have Big Problems...

Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacera...
Last Video: How NASA Reinvented The Telescope (James Webb)
• How NASA Reinvented Th...
►Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacera...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslas...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / thespacerace
► X/Twitter: / thespaceraceyt
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslasp...
Business Email: [e-mail]
#Spacex #Space #Mars

[@TheSpaceRaceYT]

Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacerace.news/subscribe

[@panagislefkokilos3082]

so much bullshit so many lies i will never understand why these people lie so much????they never went out of the earth there are no satelites the earth does not go arround the sun in the speed of 107000 km/h who is that stupid to believe this bullshit that has no logic no math no fysics nothing just pure bullshit in our faces.....they dont know shit about earth how big how wide nothing they just fix a narrative and today we have the nasa criminals steal from the american people 60 million every day to lie to them and to the world .these people belong straight in jail..they show you this ISS live in youtube and say the speed is 27500 km/h i analyze the videos and they are all fake ...when ever you ask them to tell you how a satelite goes up how it catches the running with 107000 km/h earth and what materials can stand that kind of spead they never answer they go. SO MANY LIES FROM THESE PEOPLE

[@alanwarburton8362]

I rrrbyhhhhhnnnnnnnnnnn.

[@gregtroublemaker1862]

After so many successful flights, SpaceX, Falcon 9 has spoiled us into thinking that space is easy. Great reporting and ty for not using an AI voice with no inflection, I'd much rather listen to you!

[@Gyro-721]

It's not AI it's a different person bro

[@mirandela777]

Space is NEVER easy, russian Soyuz have 3x more flights and a better safety ratting, over more than 4 decades, yet they never considered the space race "easy". We need to be realist, SpaceX and Falcon 9 are not there yet, and we are still, unfortunately, many decades away from a successfully landing on Mars. As things are going, my money is on the chinese & russian cooperation, where the space program is state funded, not private. Look at the Chinese, they have the only modern Space Station there, and they have a lot more money than Musk to fund their program. I admire Musk passion, but let's be realist - he just cannot compete ( not him nor the whole US...) with the Chinese - especially with a chinese-russian alliance..

[@everettlwilliamsii3740]

So far, there is no real competition because the Chinese have not demonstrated the ability to sustain a forward looking and innovative space program. They have certainly demonstrated an ability to copy, but their disregard for human life will eventually cause others to realize that all their gifts are Trojan horses that give them undue influence over the internal and international policies of those they help.

[@washellwash1802]

I don't know what your turnaround time for videos is, but SpaceX filed for a public safety determination with the FAA almost a day ago, which would allow them to fly the rocket while the investigation is ongoing. Given that this specific single mechanical failure having happened only once in 364 launches it's relatively safe to assume it's a one off production error and leave it up to the customers whether they want to fly or not.

[@_starfiend]

While that's technically true, SpaceX need to determine that it is only a one-off production fault, and not a more general manufacturing decline in quality that is showing up because everyone has got a bit complacent. Space is hard!

[@tombblades]

​@_starfiend but it is a one of he same way that a faulty break pad on a car is a one off...

[@Jaker788]

I don't doubt the FAA will grant the exception, which will allow non crewed launches until the investigation is finished and accepted by the FAA. But Dragon may get pushed, and the Polaris mission will definitely get pushed.

[@_starfiend]

@@tombblades How do you know? We don't! It might well be, and in fact I hope it is, in which case that's not as bad, but if it is a more general manufacturing decline then that will need to be addressed. But until that determination is made, the the FAA has a duty to ground it. Certainly of any manned missions.

[@schrodingerscat1863]

@@_starfiend The level of quality control inspection for something like a Falcon upper stage is huge with a huge paper trail for every single component. It would be straight forward to identify such a laps in quality and walk it back if that were the case. What is more likely is a component failure due to a hidden flaw that isn't currently being checked.

[@DetroitMicroSound]

Issues will ALWAYS eventually form, no matter what. "Perfection" is IMPOSSIBLE.

[@ChadDidNothingWrong]

Tell that to the FAA

[@Dragon-Slay3r]

What getting off the knees? 😂 there's a new space program

[@patrickmckowen2999]

I think the Klingons were close with the Bird of Prey 😁

[@Chris-Christopher-]

China is perfect and never has any issues.

[@DetroitMicroSound]

@@Chris-Christopher- 🤣

[@TFPrime1114]

Great video. Just one quick correction. The apu that failed on ariane 6 was actually an auxiliary propulsion unit, not an auxiliary power unit. Easy to get them mixed up because of the acronym 😂

[@TheSpaceRaceYT]

Good catch

[@shanent5793]

The manual says APU = "Auxillary Power Unit"

[@_starfiend]

@@shanent5793 Not on Ariane 6.

[@shanent5793]

@@_starfiend so which APU are they referring to in the "Ariane 6 User's Manual?"

[@_starfiend]

@@shanent5793 There is only an Auxiliary Propulsion Unit on the Ariane 6.

[@andrianosvasiliadis6960]

As you said falcon 9 has done over 300 successful missions so about 99.75% success rate that pretty good

[@user-mp3eq6ir5b]

Except for the soft and squishy parts.

[@KayoZet]

Yeah it’s pretty good, 352/355 which is 99.15% (block 1-5 Falcon 9 mission) only 3 times failure which 2 of them are in early stage.

[@ZacharyHarper]

@peacenow42 Oh go sit down at the kids table bud. if we waited for all problems on earth to be solved before moving into space we would end up getting boiled when the sun expands in a couple billion years. As long as there are humans on earth there will be problems

[@jantjarks7946]

​@peacenow - Would stopping everything which is not essential fix the issues on earth? Or wouldn't it actually make it worse?

[@jantjarks7946]

@peacenow - You mean, suddenly humanity would become perfect, because it's not doing anything beyond the essential things?

[@garyeast7259]

Boeings ceo, stonecypher or whatever. He has to be some foreign agent. He diverted 95% of the research budget for 737 max to shareholder dividends. God knows body count on that. Now hes working on space division. Considering boeings importance to us economy, he should be answering some uncomfortable questions in some committee.

[@OdinReactor]

6:15 "If ever" 🤣 RIP Boeing.

[@TheSpaceRaceYT]

Couldn't help it

[@jcdisci]

"Boing" 😝

[@KaceyGreen]

@@TheSpaceRaceYT They did it to themselves with Starliner and the Airplanes, hopefully their other groups don't start slacking too.

[@shanent5793]

Is this a serious space news channel? Neither Boeing nor NASA would give up on Starliner, especially now that Falcon 9 is grounded and underlining the need for a second domestic crewed launch provider

[@OdinReactor]

@@shanent5793 It was a mild humorous jab at Boeing, relax. Look at the bright side, at least the doors didn't fall off. 😆

[@just2bme1000]

"Textbook water landing" at 1:10 isn't the best choice of words. A textbook droneship landing would sound much better.

[@nzoomed]

Even if it had a crew dragon on board, the crew would not have been in any danger, basically they would have likely had to abort the mission and re-enter, unless the spacecraft had enough fuel to reach the ISS.

[@zzuraish]

Yeah they're safe, still... probably should avoid to splash down in the middle of vast ocean where the rescue ship or helicopter would take a long time to get there

[@nzoomed]

​@@zzuraisheven that would have been doable, the decay of the orbit still was a few days, so there would have been enough time to plan a re-entry

[@lordgarion514]

The SpaceX failure really isn't that big of a deal. There is no such thing as perfection, and even subatomic imperfections can lead to failures at these levels. So a failure every 300 plus launches pretty much makes it the most reliable thing ever to launch. Boeing on the other hand......

[@inkbold8511]

Those failures from spaceX are causing more debris in space than any Chinese spacecraft.

[@billiam6398]

⁠​⁠@@inkbold851120 satellites with very low perigee. Just a few orbits before they’re gone. I dunno about chinese *spacecraft*, but I think their anti-satellite weapons testing is way more harmful.

[@user-mp3eq6ir5b]

As the Immortal Dennis Miller once said "I have a problem flying in a plane whose name is literally "BOING!

[@nguyep4]

​@@inkbold8511You mean worst than the chinese ones crashed near towns and homes, yellow toxic fume as topping? Lol

[@sca04245]

So subatomic you say? Lol

[@P.Galore]

" All these worlds are yours except Europa. Make no attempts to land there..."

[@neilhawkes880]

As I understand it, the Falcon 9 has achieved over 300 flights without issues. Starliner has not yet achieved one flight without issues. That is a big difference.

[@donpierce4829]

Not true they have had their share of minor problems! Also, they haven't landed any ships that have landed on the ground. Space X is still landing their capsule in the ocean! Some of you have forgot about the Boeing capabilities such as X-37B. Why wasn't this space plane used is the real question it was plenty big enough!!!

[@johnburns5783]

I think this pales in comparison to the problems facing Boeing

[@coastguardcaptain]

I have complete confidence that space x will figure out what went wrong and fix it. The falcon 9 is quite dependable, the 2nd state is built new each time, and its very possible that there was a supplier or assembly issue that caused this.

[@robwilkins698]

Thank you for NOT using AI narration

[@johnwiles4391]

I dunno, but it seems to me that maybe NASA should have tested those transistors BEFORE they installed them in the spacecraft.

[@craigsheffield6546]

What? You mean we're having problems going to space? That blows my mind! This had NEVER happened before.....

[@Dordordord]

Right, when you paid the tickets, Russians never let you down, they sent you to the ISS everytime.😂😂

[@craigsheffield6546]

@@Dordordord OK, You do realize that was sarcastic. Of course, you may have.

[@40MileDesertRat]

Things break, accidents happen. But SpaceX, well their record of success speaks for itself.

[@MatthewLittle]

SpaceX's engines are nearly bulletproof so it is a surprise that there was a mishap. They'll figure it out and get things up and running again. NASA, on the other hand, has sent probes to Jupiter numerous times so for them to express concern over radiation there indicates complacency and a "ehh, we'll figure it out" attitude..

[@CalPhotoGuy]

Yeah. Big problems with KZbinrs sensationalizing a .3 percent failure rate.

[@ahr355]

NASA: "For the last time, Starliner is Not stranded!" STRAND·ED adjective 1. left without the means to move from somewhere. 😂🤣😂

[@riparianlife97701]

Say "drone ship landing". A water landing does not result in recovery except for fairings.

[@michaelreid2329]

Although it's possible the vehicle could be reused once recovered if a gentle water landing.

[@riparianlife97701]

@@michaelreid2329 But in the video, it was a drone ship landing.

[@rogerrussell9544]

Knowing Space X they have examined the next units and replaced and or redesigned any problem parts.

[@tims7250]

That's the trouble with rockets and space vehicles, they are all hand built and individually unique for that reason

[@stevenhe198911]

For astronauts who are trapped on ISS, they still are consider as "lucky" because they won' t need to stay there for long period of time… Because in future lunar base, the job position that always open will require you to stay much longer in the isolated environment with limit choice of entertainment(not to mention the food): Such as to research Fast radio burst because the signals can reveal more physical phenomena in the universe…Just like the observation of ocean wave tide helped the understanding of light wave in the 19th century… Anyway, the future new "rookies"(or "ensign"from star trek) will endure more,hmm

[@rubenjames7345]

You explained what a transistor was, but not a passivation maneuver?

[@alexanderSydneyOz]

I don't see how Spacex has a big problem because 1 upper stage failed among 300+ flights.

[@mirandela777]

SpaceX has until now 6 failures, recorded. As of August 2023, SpaceX has experienced 5 total launch failures or partial failures of their Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets since the company's founding in 2002.

[@randyblake2006]

Boeing Starliner has failure after failure and it's "no big deal". Spacex has one part fail after 350+ perfect launches and the world freaks.

[@mikegardner107]

At 3:30 it’s “Ovalur” describes something to do with an ovum or egg. Oval describes something which is elliptical. There is no word “ovalur” to describe an oval.

[@redneckcoder]

Uvula is a real thing though, but I have something in the back of my throat making it hard to say.

[@mikegardner107]

@@redneckcoder 🤣😂

[@voinea12]

I'm ovulating

[@MollyGermek]

The flight path was egg-shaped, ovular.

[@Mikau888]

wouldn't "elliptical" do?

[@pchris6662]

So doing the math, the Soyuz rocket lost around 22 rockets. Speaking for myself, I would be much MUCH more willing to ride a Falcon than I would a Soyuz.

[@寂び侘び-b6s]

It also had over 700 missions. Whose to say the Falcon won't have more failures in the future and have a similar rate by the time it has had 700 missions?

[@icaremore]

Really like the delivery of info here, good work!

[@jt9602]

Thank you for your explanation of why Jupiter has so much radiation. I always wondered why it had so much radiation while being so far away from the sun. The amount of radiation definitely makes Europa less appealing than the hype.

[@jonasgabrielsilva2996]

12:33 when amazon discover life on mars, jupiter, and beyond...

[@jonasgabrielsilva2996]

Wow! That fast?

[@wyattb3138]

Amazon will be a multi-planetary shipping company in collab with BO.

[@victorforzani3433]

Amazon cant even discover a dick up bessos ass.

[@cameronscott1853]

in 2078 ​@@wyattb3138

[@mikekannely2286]

Turns out that defying gravity, which has held both dinosaurs and modern people to the ground, is the most lucrative business currently.

[@PokeAmp]

the fact it didnt go boom, i count it as success

[@KirkSlinkard]

3:50 I just ran the numbers, and according to "The Star Trek Bible" published in the 60s warp 9 is about the same as 135,594,000 miles per second. Quite an accomplishment.

[@carloheinz6465]

Has anyone ever consider the advantages of super cold astronomical bodies and cooling needs for quantum computers? Would it not be feasible to equip a lander with equipment that need such low temperatures to run?

[@NightsOfTheRounds]

I think NASA and Boeing have problems that are greater than SpaceX alone 😂

[@corporealexistence9467]

Where are the micro vacuum tubes the DOD has been working for years? This would help with radiation issues found in space, let alone here on Earth.

[@passiondiverone2752]

Please excuse me, but what happened to the original announcer of the Space Race ? Your voice sounds similar to him .... maybe you're his sibling or cousin ? Thank you and keep up the great videos🎉

[@ComicGladiator]

So are you saying it's a bad Dragon, and they're having trouble fitting everything into a tight window?

[@digitalnomad9985]

Just a propulsion stage, not a cargo or passenger vehicle for the ISS, which is what Dragon series is. Second stage booster that gets discarded every time. In the case of an ISS run, it's the stage that goes between the first stage and the Dragon.

[@drfirechief8958]

Considering that the Falcon 9 is a proven, non-experimental system and this and several of the next flights are unmanned, Falcon should be cleared very rapidly. The un-manned flights can be a win, win for the program. It retests the Falcon after the fix is completed and all the scheduled missions will still occur. I have confidence in a rapid release to fly by NASA.

[@billotto602]

It's grounded because Boeing can't afford to have SpaceX rescue those astronauts stranded on the ISS ! Boeing is in choots with the FAA.

[@mikeandema6925]

Did you notice the ice blast away at a 90° angle when it met the thrusters?

[@ruthlemler2726]

I was so spoiled. Musk always says space is not easy. I didn’t believe it. Now my bottom lip sticks out and I pout a lot. Poor me poor me poor me. Never mind the millions SpaceX lost when this happened. I have no falcon 9 to watch. Woe is me😢

[@TiberiusMaximus]

so happy he's moving Space X and X to Texas

[@wyattnoise]

Oh no! Now how will NASA ask SpaceX to save the astronauts that don't need saved?

[@danbradley6696]

You could always use glass tubes instead of transistors ! LOL :)

[@KwadDamyj]

Never thought I'd ever see an Apollo 13-type scenario in my lifetime. Crazy.

[@_starfiend]

And as yet you still haven't.

[@cornerpage6634]

I'm not sure you have a solid understanding of Apollo 13.

[@KwadDamyj]

@@cornerpage6634 I meant in the sense that we're encountering an issue getting astronauts back to Earth due to the Boeing foulups, not that it's a 1-to-1 comparison.

[@_starfiend]

@@KwadDamyj Not really. The tests Boeing are doing are on that part of the system that will never reach Earth, so can only be done in space.

[@Philly_Willy]

@@KwadDamyj To be fair to Boeing, the Capsule is fine, it's just the service module with issues; it being docked to the station is the only time engineers can gather data from faults and is the only time they can gather information; the service module will burn up during reentry.

[@gabrielglouw3589]

Thing about SpaceX when they run into a problem like this, you can bet it’s going to get fixed ASAP. And the fix isn’t going to take years to implement or cost billions of dollars because it’s over engineered.

[@mikegardner107]

At 1:20 NOT a water landing! It landed on a droneship!

[@TheMarpalm]

Exactly

[@merkridge8780]

0:18 While you’re scaring everyone here into believing it’s doom n gloom for SpaceX, postings on X said they’ve rectified the problem and are waiting for approval to launch another Falcon 9. Ooops.

[@BrianBull]

F9 will receive approval from the FAA any day now! Everything is fine.

[@KillerBreeze420]

Wasn't it only the 2nd stage they went bad? Nothing to fix if i was the 2nd stage since they are always new rockets strange.

[@tunicolage]

Main problem with Dragon being grounded is not being able to rescue Starliner crew

[@TimothyLipinski]

Great Comment ! With the SpaceX Falcon 9 Crew Dragon being grounded then you have the Boeing Starliner to rescue the Crew from the ISS ! You would not have both Launch providers to LEO to both have a problem at the same time ! The Boeing Capsule can rescue the SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule and the SpaceX Crew Dragon can rescue the Boeing Starliner Capsule ! Also soon the SNC sierra Space Crew Dream Chaser will be flying soon ! tjl

[@mkgtomer207]

@@TimothyLipinskiBoeing can’t even rescue the crew it has up there lol

[@Philly_Willy]

@@TimothyLipinski Crew Dragon isn't grounded; the Capsule and service module is fine, unlike Boeing. Only the falcon 9 rocket itself is grounded. I do agree that redundancy for launch providers is a great thing, and hope Boeing can make a better service module next time.

[@mattskov2917]

They would not hesitate to launch dragon on a falcon 9 to rescue the ISS astronauts if they needed it. Common sense. Also, starliner is capable of returning the astronauts.

[@BraskHouseConcerts]

Who made the transistors?

[@chriscur79]

It seems like this channel does not like space x much. I have been noticing more and more of that . One problem and this video portrays ot as an absolute collapse of NaSA and space x

[@chriscur79]

@@paulhiggins6024 yeah. It really is. And I like this channel . But I will not support them if they continue to beat down the SpaceX team every chance they get. It doesn't make sense. They must not like Elon . I was going to renew my subscription but I will wait. Spaceflight now at least has some neutrality.

[@itheuserfirst3186]

@@chriscur79 Does anyone like Elon?

[@chriscur79]

@@itheuserfirst3186 I for one do. He has great ideas and he tries to better our lives. And he knows how to make money. Nothing wrong with that. In my eyes anyway

[@itheuserfirst3186]

@@chriscur79 Gullible at best. The dude is a self-serving creep. Investigate. Don't be the fanboy casualty.

[@gregwaters944]

Nasa has certainly painted themselves into a corner, maybe they should beg FAA to let the Falcon 9 fly again.

[@magnetospin]

Hmmm, this is the second video where the voice is different. Is this going to be perm?

[@redneckcoder]

Must have changed AI voice models.

[@tanzanos]

SpaceX is doing just fine.

[@marcwolf60]

Sadly the most reliable ship can still have a one off fault in a production run.

[@IblameBlame]

How can a geomagnetic storm make low Earth orbit satellites crash? If anything, it could knock out their ion thrusters, making them unable to counteract atmospheric drag, causing them to crash after a few months or so.

[@catprog]

It heat the atmosphere causing it to expand and enter the satellite's orbit.

[@IblameBlame]

@@catprog oh yeah. I had forgotten about that. But the process still takes a while to make their orbit decay. The way it was formulated made it sound like they crashed during the storm.

[@brj_han]

I find it interesting that i haven't seen a single mention of the Moon Landing on it's anniversary...

[@blainetoms]

if this voice is another AI it’s at least a lot better than the last - i miss the og narrator though.

[@psu2dcu]

The title is overly dramatic. 1 failure in 364 launches or a 99.72% success rate is the most reliable craft in history (and even that does not consider that the main booster returned safely).

[@XCX237]

The FAA is the same green light to launch star leaker. They knew that starleaker was defective and let it happen. How dare they question falcon 9.😡

[@_starfiend]

Totally different fault so it's perfectly reasonable to check. Checking when something like this happens is very much a necessity.

[@GiannisRigas]

You started your video with a failure of the rocket... dude the upper stage ONLY had a small issue (did finish the mission). There was only a leak in the upper stage. How is the whole rocket had a problem. You need to report the facts not what you feel.

[@gregtroublemaker1862]

It's been up there so long that I almost forgot about the Boeing starliner. What an embarrassment for all involved, especially NASA.

[@guillaumechevalier3368]

Thank you for your appreciation for the new European rocket! Long live Ariane 6!

[@jeffmcdonald101]

Nobody says "two point seven thousand dollars". It's "two thousand seven hundred dollars", or "twenty-seven hundred dollars". Just a heads up. It sounds very strange. No Native English speaker would ever say this.

[@rexroscoeroggaschjr7530]

Meanwhile the stranded astronauts are trying to decide who gets eaten first

[@shanent5793]

5:25 who's the fourth NASA astronaut?

[@justasindriliunas4600]

he made a mistake, there should be 3 astronauts and Aleksandr Vladimirovich Gorbunov he is a Russian cosmonaut.

[@removechan10298]

Well, spacex sure do have egg on their face that they couldn't circularize that ... OVULAR orbit... ... c'mon man...

[@uuzd4s]

Somebody in SpaceX's oxygen line installation dept got some Splainin to do ! 🤔

[@troyupshaw7227]

what are the odds? Someone threw a wrench in the falcon..... someone didn't want the dragon to rescue the piece of just attached to the ISS.

[@LelandReview]

NASA don't care. They have a JPL parking lot full of luxury sports cars either way...

[@PDVism]

How do you mean successful maiden flight for the ESA rocket. Surely it was an utter and complete failure. Where were the botched launches, the explosions, the inability to reach orbit, the failure to adhere to it's flight plan, etc? You know, all the halmarks of SpaceX Starship launches that are deemed successes? :)

[@Graeme_Lastname]

I'd love to know how much and what type of crap these launches put into my air supply.

[@James-bc7sk]

Couldn't come at a worse time? How do you figure?

[@kaguya6900]

I keep mistaking "crewed mission" for "crude mission," and I can't help but wonder what a crude space mission would look like. Dirty jokes from the ISS?

[@gabrielleyba2842]

5:23 Aleksandr Vladimirovich Gorbunov is a Russian cosmonaut - wikipedia

[@belyndasonger7574]

Im surprised no one said "Look at the mouse! This has to be fake!" SMH.

[@VL-inquisitor]

Maybe, CNSA can be called for the rescue?

[@asdfadfafsdfa]

Boeing had a problem.. GROUND EVERYONE SO THE PRIVATE SECTOR CANT KEEP GETTING AHEAD lol

[@itheuserfirst3186]

What does Boeing have to do with this? You fanboy freaks are a piece of work.

[@mattbarbour8192]

Atlas 5 has a higher success rate than any rockets mentioned in this video. They are still around. Nationalize one of them for this emergency! Further, SpaceX will be launching an empty Ship to pick them up. If it fails no one will die. It will be about de-orbiting back to Earth. It has shown no problems with that as of yet.

[@f1s2hg3]

I HAVE ONE QUESTION WHY ARE WE NOT WALKING ABOUT ON THE MOON? 🌙

[@ryzlot]

Second stage is a single-engine vehicle. I remember my pilot anxieties flying a single - especially over water multi is much better for the worry factor JR

[@qa1e2r4]

Crewed mission pushing the limits of dragon and falcon 9?.... Am i the only one getting a red flag feeling?

[@milleniumsolo7335]

Pff 325 flights without problems. Look the Murphy Law ,

[@livinglandmine4374]

This is very fascinating stuff

[@davidredfern836]

Another obstacle to slow space x down. With three hundred successful missions under their belt i think they know what they are doing , unlike Boeing and nasa 🧐

[@dancarlile915]

I trust space x over boeing

[@user-mp3eq6ir5b]

@08:40 - When building electronic assemblies, why not build several identical circuits to cover the imperfections that appear during testing? Considering that these components are made from incredibly small photo resist and plating techniques and that there is no such thing as a single "transistor" as during the 1960's. Just an amateur comment, I have no idea how to protect against the ultra-high magnetic radiation encountered in the Jovian Sphere of Influence.

[@rh906]

Societal requirement to say "Suck it Musk!". There, now leave me alone.

[@handyman75657]

I would bet that if they move to a small willing country their lives would get much better? Portugal? Spain? They might actually pay them to move to their country? Just never know now do we? I wonder what England feels? Scotland? Ireland? The choices are endless?

[@Rexil9]

On reddit now probably: Elon musk makes exploding rockets, why bother.

[@itheuserfirst3186]

Elon doesn't make shit.

[@thedoctor.a.s1401]

1:30 this shit looks like the eye of sauron

[@JoeCosentino]

I guess Elon doesn’t want to rescue the the starliner

[@donaldmarwitz2046]

Perhaps they need to stop using them at 60 flights, everything has a life limit. So set your prices based of on that, they do it with jets , so why not rockets.