UniFi Network 9.0: A Game Changer!

[@justinrutledge1221]

I think Ubiquiti is on fire right now! I think they have dug their heals in and are showing they really serious about breaking into the more "enterprise" market. I am absolutely on board at this point.

[@CanadaHasFallen]

Their stock price tells the story

[@threepe0]

Yeah if they could only get on top of their years-old bug reports, abysmal support and documentation (partly because they keep “improving” things with buggy features) and overall poor price to performance… let’s not even talk about the linux cloud key distro not being maintained or them pushing customers on cloud features they don’t need or want… ubiquiti is garbage, let’s be real.

[@ThePirateGod]

I feel like supply shortages caused by covid hurt them especially when more and more people where bored building out higher end home networks. As well as businesses upgrading networks to help work from home setups. I think now that Ubiquiti seems to have solved most of their supply issues. They are doubling down on new hardware and the software is also taking a huge step forward.

[@stultuses]

They will leave their home customer base behind

[@ThePirateGod]

@@stultuses I doubt it they were never a home customer product. But I see there small business gear still being used for higher end home setups for a long time. and they will always have the ones like me that have $3000+ setups at home because we want better professional consumer products than anyone else. Hell the setup I just set up on my family farm was about $15,000 so far with cameras. they thought it was too much and after telling them for years they wish they said yes sooner.

[@cejay67]

This has been such an interesting few years. We are a mid sized MSP in Australia. We’ve been using UniFi for close to when they launched in Australia. To see their progression has been quite the experience. Not having visibility to their roadmap has led to plenty of head scratching, but it all seems to be coming to fruition now. As for a subscription, we have a new client with a SonicWall subscription for an EOL product. The yearly fee is more than a fully decked out UDM SE x 2. Our Meraki clients have devices that will brick after the subscription ends. I see no issue with optional subscription fees for advanced features. And as an MSP with clients who use laptops, then protection and filtering is done on the endpoint and whilst we may use basic filters at the perimeter, the days when all our risks could be contained inside that perimeter are long gone.

[@Hephaestus93]

look in to Cloudflare service called FireWall as a Service for FWaaS. I work for an MSP here in California and we dont deploy SonicWall or Meraki any longer as the total cost of ownership is just crazy expensive now. We use EdgeRouters or UDM's and use Cloudflare to filter everything at the WAN. The on-prem firewall does almost nothing as far as filtering and honestly the ease and repeatability of deployment and ability to remotely manage the firewall too. Game changer for us.

[@mcury85]

Zone based firewall is nice.. Starting to lean towards unifi from pfsense. Where I live, unifi devices are much cheaper than a netgate appliance.

[@ColeBlack2]

Same! Lots of my business clients are running pfsense but I’ve put in quite a few UDM SEs and been loving the hardware and I think this 9.0 just sealed the deal on the software. Just bought a UDM Pro Max and the brand new 24 HD switch to “upgrade” my Netgate 6100 at my house.

[@chrisrobinson3771]

Can we get a video on how to create rules for our IoT network? I’d like to have rules that would let my default network have access to my IoT but not vice versa.

[@MisterFastbucks]

Crosstalk has a whole series of videos on that.

[@chrisrobinson3771]

@ I know but it’s 3 years old and not with the new Zone based firewall rules.

[@jochenhartmann5089]

@@chrisrobinson3771 Agree!

[@jochenhartmann5089]

How to set up a typical home network. Main / IOT / Guest,... It would be interesting to see how to set up the rules for accessing Apple TV within the IoT network. But still, keep it separate from the rest.

[@Ck87JF]

4:20 - if you go here and pause, you'll see the image of the zone-based rule grid. Along the Y-axis (up & down) you have the source zone; left to right provides destination zones. So you'd do something like this: 1. Find IoT in the source and follow that across to your other zones (like default or trusted) 2. Click the button intersecting those and add a block rule. 3. Find Trusted in the source and IoT in destination, click the button, and add an allow rule. This is super generic, but that's the idea behind this interface.

[@slipknottin]

I think if I was making the choice today I’d go with the unifi rather than the pfsense route I went a couple years ago. Not that I’ve had any issues at all with my pfsense setup, but I like the simplicity with being in the unifi ecosystem and having all my devices in one home.

[@jjann54321]

Agreed. Having, worked with pfSense and UniFi I can say that UniFi feels much more "Apple/iOS" in that with little bit of effort it always "just works" whereas pfSense feels more like Linux in that it can do anything, and possibly better, however it is less "consumer/user friendly" and requires much more effort to configure and maintain. If you're going for user dashboard/interface aesthetics, pfSense pales in comparison. IMO edit: you're not your

[@wjjohns04able]

Yeah me to. Used pfsense for awhile and switched over. It’s simple, don’t have to mess with it too much and it’s got camera system and everything baked in.

[@chefdeit]

It's very interesting to me that people are happy to introduce a vendor cloud dependency to their network where they had none before.

[@slipknottin]

@ what vendor cloud dependency?

[@Ck87JF]

​@@slipknottinI think there was a period in which Ubiquiti tried to force new users to sign up for cloud management as a parallel to local access. People threw a fit because they didn't want their stuff in the cloud and Ubiquiti retracted the requirement.

[@Obtuse94]

For us plebs that are non-IT business / non Enterprise admins, a 2025/9.0 Unifi firewall/security setup, including VLANs, IoT - Home Assistant, maybe even AP/hardware ideas/suggestions (knowing that every deployment is different) would be a killer video or series. Unifi's new zone based firewalls and also the moves they are making with 3rd party camera support in Protect have really made me glad it is where I decided to put my money for my home networks. Also, on the proofpoint thing - I actually like seeing these value added (even for a cost) features being added. Even if I (don't think) proofpoint is needed for my soho network.

[@illeatmyhat]

I think the average residential user would be perfectly served by a unifi dream machine pro, no VLANs, a POE switch, a bunch of cameras, and as many APs as they can afford

[@chefdeit]

@@illeatmyhat would you defined what you mean by "perfectly served"? Because the average residential user is currently being taken advantage of in the areas of: - egregious copying of their private, personal data by major corporations and re-sold to data brokers to each other & anyone else who'll pay; - exposure via common smart devices (wi-fi bulbs, smart light switches, cameras etc), whose weak CPUs only handle inadequate security protocols, and which often come with baked in, immutable vendor back-doors.

[@Obtuse94]

Thank you@@chefdeit this is where my concern and need for better security at home stems from!

[@WesleySmith-q9c]

I love they added proofpoint. I just see it like a plugin/addon you can pay for. You don't lose the security they offer for free built-in. I'm not sure why people get upset.

[@Obtuse94]

100% this.

[@rayjaymor8754]

People absolutely love to whinge and sook.

[@jcnash02]

Because people want everything for free. Many UniFi users do not understand how things work and the facts that these feeds come from people doing this research, threat hunting, etc. Someone needs to pay those salaries.

[@GStreetEntertainment]

It's just amazing to see the progress they made with their software. I remember when they first launched UniFi OS and ppl went crazy about all the missing features, UI changes, etc. and now we see great improvements with each update.

[@MrSunDevil23]

I am Cisco CCIE, CISSP, Meraki, HPE, ITiL, HIPAA and PCI certified engineer for almost 30 years. I go back to the PIX days for firewalls and then it was definitely a different story. Today, I hope to see more home users start using small UniFi devices for edge security now that they have made it easier for home users with this update. Big box store firewalls are great but no one ever really spend time to set them up correctly and therefore bots become prolific. Segmenting IoT devices, guest network, etc. is easy to do and yet overlooked so much it makes me sad.

[@DPCTechnology]

Im super impressed with the development over the last 18-24 months. It has been really impressive.

[@mvp_kryptonite]

I echo this, I recall not even too long ago there were grumblings about UniFi should focus on software but from my perspective, they have increased their output in terms of software and hardware. I welcome the odd sales they started about a year ago too. Great job (along with you guys posting the content too)

[@tp3960]

$500 is pennies for a large org, this is lovely.

[@wildmanjeff42]

I love Ubiquiti products, and I have never really understood firewall rules, I can do really basic things with Lawrence Systems videos :) but I am already leaning on getting a UNVR Pro as well. Thanks for the video !

[@ronaldvargo4113]

Just got done setting up a Dream Router in a home office for a friend and did the legacy rules mode then on Monday big update and now this option. So far, I am liking what I am seeing in the version 9 network It was really easy to leverage the zones since we VLANd the office, home, IoT, camera, and Guest networks. It fit really well into how UI modeled their implementation.

[@thbe51]

In addition to this it is now very easy to import ssl-certificates like Let's Encrypt......

[@DavidC-rt3or]

With the api's looking to see more endpoints added and then be able to do integrations from automation to do things like enable/disable lockdown mode or toggling poe/ports on/off etc

[@onnobakker9173]

Any opinions on the value of the proofpoint offer?

[@AffTalk]

I feel strongly now that my decision to convert over to all UniFi for my network gear was the best decision I made. I feel even better about my decision because I opted for the Dream Machine Pro Max so I don’t miss out on any of the new features. Keep the improvement coming UniFi.

[@joshstewart2131]

For a home user, how do the existing ‘Active Detections’ that have been there in Unifi for a long while compare to Proofpoint?

[@buhizkewl7105]

Is it time for an updated “pfsense vs unifi” video, yet?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

Yes

[@buhizkewl7105]

@ Fantastic!

[@Ck87JF]

Dude I literally JUST bought a new Netgate router last week because my old one (SG-4860) died. It would be interesting to see where Unifi routing and firewall stuff is, but I can probably wait till my next device to switch. 😅

[@Saturn2888]

I literally just posted on the UI Forums about finding an easier way to debug and verify firewall rules because I wanna VLAN all my devices, but I want each brand of device to have a separate VLAN. This is a solution to that problem FINALLY!

[@NTVN-Alex]

Hey Tom, I was wondering how you would compare the current version of Unifi router/firewall against pfsense? As a Unifi network owner but also pfsense router owner I would be highly interested in that. For instance, in pfsense, I have 2 WAN connections and some policies around what client goes out over which WAN line as well as a general failover pool. Would that work with Unifi? Also, I have a subnet of public IPs assigned for hosting a couple of services. How's that looking in Unifi? And more :)

[@Hossimo]

The zone based firewalls are awesome. I have a number of pfsense boxes and I'm almost ready to switch.

[@Jonny_O]

It’s not often that you see a company get their ducks in a row like this in an area they previously left their customer base wanting more. (Fortinet, are you listening?!) Ubiquiti should be commended for their efforts.

[@ashuggtube]

Thank you, Tom! Great video.

[@talbech]

They are definitely moving in the right direction. Am I ready to replace Juniper and OPNsense setups at customers? Not just yet.

[@JetBlackRage]

Keen for that firewall video, used your rules to help lock my IoT away from my guest and home devices, so eager to see what the next version looks like with 9.0

[@CutePetandDogs]

Switched to all unifi a while ago, couldnt be happier

[@karlsenpal]

Using UniFi on my UDM SE in my home lab, and so far, it looks pretty promising! One thing I wish for, though, is the ability to delete default rules. For example, I have to add a block rule above the default allow rule in some cases. It works, but instead of showing 'BLOCK ALL,' it just says 'View Policies (2),' which isn't as clear. Hoping they improve this!

[@chrisjones1075]

I bought a UDM-SE in December and have yet to install it, and this update just validates every reason I went with Ubiquity in the firsts place.

[@scockman]

Another awesome video, Tom. Keep up the great work you are doing! I love the new direction Ubiquiti is going with this. Ran their network equipment for years paired with a pfSense router, then when pfSense did their "hiccup", I jumped ship and went to running TP-Link Omada. But now I am back and going all in on Unifi network. I have their Dream Machine Pro Max, USW Pro Aggregation, USW Pro 24 PoE (already had), etc. Just picked up the UNAS Pro to team up with my Proxmox cluster and other projects. Waiting for the 2U PDU to come back in stock and will get one of those to round out my 10U rack.

[@Ck87JF]

What hiccup happened with pfsense?

[@levifig]

Plus they added the Fortress Gateway, which is their first device that is considered for larger production environment.

[@ColbyPerry]

I've never used a Unifi firewall even though I've used the switching and WAPs for several years now. I may have a chance to deploy a Unifi firewall very soon though.

[@jjann54321]

Tom, love your shirt! It's up there with your old "Keep your crimp had strong" version. Haha

[@ChristopherNealBUSHIDO49ERS]

I feel that Ubiquiti is on a ROLL!!!! This is truly a game changer!

[@rqs.beratung-conseil]

Dear Tom Short, concise and very informative. Thank you very much. 👍

[@magnus33john]

Things are certainly improving and in the process becoming a more user friendly experience. I get the whole cybersecure option and have no issues with it. It would have been a good idea to add the option for one of the user supported ones that pfsense/opnsense can use but i get the reasons for not doing so at this point.

[@theangryintern]

Do you need a specific device to see the zone based firewall stuff? I'm on 9.0.108 but I'm not seeing that. I'm guess in my UDM Base is not supported?

[@lzcpg]

I still really want to see better IPv6 support (i.e create an IPv6 only VLAN, at least for the UDM Pro, it can only do IPv4 and dual stack at the moment), but the API and integration news is fantastic to hear.

[@FatherlyFox]

I'm honestly waiting for UI to implement support for 6in4 or similar tunnels natively instead of having to use telnetdoogie's boot script for the HE TunnelBroker service. Right now that setup is absolutely awful and causes my ipv6 tunnel to only have like 200kbps and is god awful to use since the ip stack preference usually does ipv6 first.

[@glendady8879]

The Zone Based Firewall feature is awesome, but after selecting it, I was not able to move my IoT network to the DMZ zone. Evidently since the network was imported at activation to the Internal zone, you are not allowed to move the network to a different zone. I ended up restoring from backup to the old firewall rules until this is resolved.

[@johnvanwinkle4351]

I just upgraded t 9.0 this morning, but coming from a PFSense background I find Ubiquiti's firewall rules a little more challenging to setup and configure. I am still working on understanding them for my home setup before implementing them for my networks. I think this is a nice feature and look forward to using it more. Thanks for another great video Tom!

[@evenacona]

I love the direction they are taking having 8 unifi sites that I manage. If you are doing a deep dive on the ZBF - I would love to see you cover the firewall implications of using the firewall with larger networks using L3 switches like the Agg pro and campus switches. This is where I think they still need to do some work as currently if you move a vlan to be routed by an L3 switch it disappears from the ZBF management interface. It doesn't even show up as an external zone nor can you add it to a zone to define policies. This forces you to route all the traffic up to your UDM / UXG / Etc as I have found that port forwards to vlans my switch route do not seem to work no matter how you try and define External Internal / External rules. The rest of it is absolutely amazing work, just a lot of opportunities for additional function. For instance simply give the ability to take a VLAN managed by unifi and routed by a switch to be put into a zone so you can easily create rule sets for when it transitions through the firewall internal zone on it's way to the WAN interface ;)

[@DonnieKluck]

Currently running pFsense for my firewall. With this new software update, would you lean or switch over to Unifi firewalls/gateway now or would you still stick with pFsense?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

Comes down to use case, not sure I can fully replace my pfsense yet.

[@stephenoreilly3696]

Enjoy your content! Thanks

[@jrtech3165]

Thank you Lawrence!! We use Sonicwall's due to the Site - to - Site VPN do you know if Mesh with Unifi is done in the same way?

[@OGParzoval]

As a PaloAlto firewall lover who has used checkpoint, Cisco Forepower, and many others. This is welcome. Curious did they ditch the old IDP so it’s no longer there if you don’t subscribe?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

Nope, the free version is still there

[@joshhaas8121]

I updated my self hosted controller but zones were not presented… any ideas?

[@Traumatree]

When I segment a network I usually provide my client with a "security matrix" that is very much alike what Unifi is doing with Zones. But having that kind of 'matrix' directly on the firewall will be much easier to implement them and follow them afterward when a audit is done. I too am changing my mind about their firewall and might have to buy one to check that out.

[@matthewhicks6089]

The proofpoint service is not a deal breaker because the firewall still has updated ET threat data which is just as good honestly. The proof point exists so they can enter a business segment where the third party support is a pre-req by a businesses security design (offload liability). As long as we equally see continued development on their other product lines I feel they are moving in the right direction.

[@thomasedin764]

For me the threat intelligence feed is important and you need to have a constant update. People don't understand the cost it's to maintain and keep track of the threats out there in a timely fashion. I liked Pfsense before it was locked in and the world in a sense was easier when it comes to security. But now days i prefer a firewall which blocks most of the unwanted traffic as possible, before it enters the users hardware.

[@fairlightje]

Still missing the option for WireGuard site 2 site to third party :/

[@GpconnectInfohotspot]

the real issue with ubiquiti is still in 2025 the lack of a NAC solution and 802.1x implementation for their products to be considered serious

[@matthiasjooris1460]

the only thing holding me back is the lack of logging. there is just no easy way to troubleshoot firewall rules. no way of seeing what rule is being hit. what traffic is being blocked or passed. as soon as they implement that, i'm sold!

[@renovxperts]

Thanks Tom. Great overview as usual. What’s your take, do you think or see an all-UniFi setup now being a solid option for those that currently have UniFi network kit but with pfSense as FW?

[@samsampier7147]

Does look very nice. Was disappointed in changes to the installer for PFSENSE. I do not need or want a guided installer. The only limitation is still no virtual firewall, so still PFSENSE for that.

[@rpungello]

Really hope this new API can be used to control the outlets on UniFi PDUs. Would definitely be nice to be able to get that integrated into home automation platforms.

[@gregorydelapierre582]

FW is getting better, however 2 requirements I could not implement which would make my life easier: zone FW would be better at Site Manager level, so I can create rules between site A and site B without the need to maintain rulesets on both UDM. Also, I could not find a way to create/modify default security posture (allow all/block all) for existing and new zone. Duplicating rules would be nice too. To be clear, whilst I do miss my PFsense firewalls, network 9 is significantly reducing my frustration with FW rule management. Big step forward !

[@fl3shgordon]

Love their investment in software. It will bring in new customers for sure. Having used them at home for the last 5 years I'm thrilled. I sure hope they avoid the temptation to move to a subscription service for what they already offer. Right now, it's a great time to be a Ubiquiti customer and recommend them to others.

[@hammerforce1024]

Are there any similar interfaces / UI (extensions/addons) for PFsense?

[@VeniVV]

Ok, real question. Where do I get that shirt?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

lawrence.video/swag

[@brucedeleon9103]

UNifI, nice to know very good video .....

[@koga7349]

Is it possible to wire up a different threat signature platform besides CyberSecure? Or something open source and free?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

The free one is still there if you don't use the paid one.

[@adaster98]

I don't really understand this new interface. I upgraded my personal home setup just to give it a whirl, but I will not be migrating my client networks until I can get a grasp on this whole 'zones' situation. I'm a simple woman, I liked my basic firewall rules. They worked great.

[@TriLaVo]

What do you think about the new firewall features? Im on a pfsense self build Firewall and more then happy with the performance and everything. But what buggs me was always the "you have to stick to our hardware" and so far I didnt like the hardware so much. I need 1G fiber on WAN and 10G dual on internal (Servers and Client network). is this now usable and good?

[@timramich]

Where can I hire someone to help me with networking stuff? I need to do VLAN routing stuff on a Brocade switch and I can't get it to work.

[@seidmadur]

So Zone-Based Firewalling is not available on the UXG-Pro.... because?

[@mattwork99]

The firmware hasn’t been released yet. If you’d like to test it, it is out in early access, but I’ve not tried it yet. Assuming it’ll be officially released shortly.

[@seidmadur]

@@mattwork99 Oh! Thanks :)

[@EthosAtheos]

They need a free tier for the active threat detection for non business users or offer anti-virus with it. Because at 100$ / year for a home router it is rather expensive. Without some sort of updating threat protection a firewall isn't going to cut it anymore. Even home users need more than a NAT with rules.

[@justinrutledge1221]

It comes with active threat detection and an active ruleset. The subscription simply ads more rules from other sources.

[@DJGeek]

I've already upgrade to 9.0 how to I upgrade the Firewall to the new standard

[@ps0111]

To migrate to Zone-Based Firewalls, navigate to Security > Traffic & Firewall Rules and click Upgrade. (From the Unifi Website)

[@20windfisch11]

Can it do CNAME for DNS yet? This has been marked as “Coming soon” for so long now.

[@jaybigboy34]

Are you going to do any videos on netgate no longer supporting 7100? Thank you.

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

it's reached EOL per their page

[@jaybigboy34]

@LAWRENCESYSTEMS yes I know. Just wondering why only that one and not any of the other models. Also there is a new update out.

[@chrislowe8085]

i love unifi my whole network is that from the USW Pro 24 to U6 LR to the flex mini and the U6 Extender for whole house WIFI, I'm liking v9 alot I host my own controller on unraid. I will say they have come leeps and bounds on new features some I have no need for but thats just me. Other people may need it. Super easy to admin, being an IT Admin for over 25 years I will say this is easier that cisco or any other system.

[@XciterD]

I'm hoping for a flow-based configuration UI similar to Node-RED eventually, it just makes so much sense for VLANs and networking in general to get a visual overview! I'm going to update now and check this out, looks good!

[@0M9H4X_Neckbeard]

Im on Unifi Network 9.0.108 but I don't have the new matrix policy view

[@justbkaz1]

I'm still waiting on Unifi to update the UXG-Max to 4.1.3 so I can try out the Zone Based Firewall.

[@MikeontheMandolin]

You were really hard to rationalize Ubiquiti breaking their promise.

[@OuchMySpleen]

Still no support for multiple WAN ip blocks? I would love to switch but that combined with their half baked DHCP server stuff makes it a non starter.

[@rookie28604]

If not having the threat feed doesn't break the firewall, I don't see why people are complaining.

[@franklynhamilton7558]

I would like to see features like an IP address being automatically blocked because it has made z number of failed attempts to get into the network and the blocked IP being communicated to all the other firewalls in your fabric

[@Darobe9926]

The new firewall in Network is nice. Though I am not gonna lie I would love for an integration now between pfsense and Ubiquiti. Let me setup my VLANs once and use pfsense to do that, setup my rules, etc but have UniFi import them so it’s seemless. If someone isn’t running pfsense on their own environment then UniFi firewall is finally ready for that now vs going “oh gee Scoob I hope that bad guy doesn’t come for us.” Pre Network 9 it was kind of a crap shoot. Now it’s better. Also I don’t super give a damn about their endpoint subscription. If the first year was included maybe but nah not really.

[@melbeckman4266]

LOL! Their Zones and Policy Matrix look like a clone of SonicWall!

[@alecfagan9753]

Just needs an OOB MGMT Port on their devices.

[@travisaugustine7264]

I'm going to go with (and this is coming from a UDMSE owner)..."Come so far...but still have a long way to go". They need to get their IPv6 feature set to match their IPv4 feature set. For example, as of the last time I tried the early release (about a month ago), DPI still didn't work properly with IDing IPv6 traffic which makes block traffic rules effectively useless in a dual stack environment.

[@AZTrucker]

Considering that i have pfSense thanks to Tom, I'm assuming this is geared for people that don't have a firewall like pfSense and need one to setup. So this wouldn't be for me.

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

Correct

[@barhomt]

self hosted controller and this new firewall? I cant see it

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

No, the firewall is not on the self hosted contoller.

[@barhomt]

Why though what's the reason?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

@@barhomt Becease the UniFi EFG has a built in controller

[@px794]

I don't know how Unifi arrange their updaes but there's a degree of frustration that you cannot merely apt update, and that include all the necessary database updates and pre-requisities. Using third party scripts to handle this just feels clumsy, despite how much effort is clearly put into them. If they're going to push the management software, it should be easy to install and manage.

[@acrusso1]

I cant break up with pfsense mostly because of HAproxy and a little bit of pfblockerng.

[@gustavohg33]

Please, talk about the country restrictions, there is no way to see ALL selected countrys on the list, se need to click on edit and scrool to see what is selected or not, its a easy fix, but someone need to mencion that

[@RC-1290]

Next up: IPv6 as first class citizen?

[@yourpcmd]

I just don't want to see Ubiquiti take some of their built-in features that could be off-loaded to a 3rd party that will charge a subscription. This will eventually leave Ubiquiti with just making the equipment and once you purchase it, during setup you'll just pick and choose what you want, get the monthly subscription total, and pay before you finish the setup, all while paying Apple pricing for the equipment.

[@MeneM2Mateo]

Can I request some content with Mikrotik? ;-)

[@antoinechatelain550]

2024/25 is the year of Ubiquity opening the walled garden First ovnif The. Network Api And in the near future 3rd party phone to talk Great to see this. I really hope Talk will get this level of polish. It’s a great product but the software is lacking

[@WhatMACHI]

"Done school...districts" O_O

[@Gaijin101]

hell yea. this is a welcomed changed

[@YorkshireScooter]

Lots of unfinished features with unifi network i.e. when will they finish adding CNAME to there DNS server

[@CyberSecure]

i still think ubiquiti is not enterprise ready and only really good for small businesses and prosumers, i still have nightmares from the time they put cheap usb sticks as ROM memory for their "Enterprise" NVR's when gen 1 was released.

[@chaosfenix]

I think they are really pushing into enterprise and not just in the features they offer. I have appreciated the new features but they are steadily pushing up the prices of their products to a more enterprise level. The old U6 Enterprise is sold for about $280 where the new E7 is $500. The UDMs as well. The UDM Pro is $380 where the new Pro Max that adds another drive bay and a slightly faster processor is $600. Yes they have newer devices but they are either slower than the older gear and meant to be more entry level or they are pushing north of $1000.

[@griffincash661]

I think my only issue is I absolutely hate proofpoint. If somebody has a contact please let them know my email server is blocked and all I would like is a response acknowledging it.

[@RonLaws]

People complaining about The CyberSecure Subscription being as if Ubiquity Broke a sub-free promise is the same as saying they broke it because you have to pay monthly to your ISP for internet service. If the people crying foul over the former can't wrap their head around the sheer stupidity of that argument and see sense, then maybe those same people need to change career to something else. - My Hot Take.

[@TechySpeaking]

First

[@digitalballistics]

My take of Unifi firewalls is that they are second to PFSense and OPNSense. It isn't that I dislike them, I just feel they are inferior to other options.

[@knietiefimdispo2458]

So the GREAT NEW THING is zone view in the firewall ui. That‘s it?

[@LAWRENCESYSTEMS]

Zone FW, threat feeds and an API

[@knietiefimdispo2458]

... and threat feeds are wrong because they swapped source and destination in the activity messages.