2010 Ford Ranger 4.0L V6 Automatic - POV Driving Impressions

Order a FIXD Bluetooth OBD-2 reader for only $20 (normally $60) with our affiliate link: bit.ly/3f5M4VI
2010 Ford Ranger XLT 4.0L V6 Automatic 4-Door Super Cab
MPG: 16 city / 21 highway
Engine: 4.0 L V6
Horsepower: 207 hp @ 5,250 rpm
Transmission: 5-speed automatic
Curb weight: 3,210 lbs
Dimensions: 204″ L x 69-71″ W x 66-68″ H
126" Wheelbase
TheTopher on Instagram: / thetopher2
The audio in this video was recorded with in-ear binaural microphones, headphones are highly recommended!
Here's the equipment I use (with affiliate links):
-GoPro Hero 11 Black amzn.to/3CWWeRQ
-Binaural Audio - Roland CS-10EM Microphones amzn.to/2qKRbwA
-Connected to & powered by the Zoom H2n recorder amzn.to/2pQqVkq
-Don't forget the Hat Clip mount for that perfect POV angle: amzn.to/2GW7nmd
-The best place to get tires: bit.ly/2JyRg3j
Need a Bluetooth OBD-2 reader? Order FIXD for only $20 with my affiliate link (normally $60)! bit.ly/3eDN8gN
Off The Record makes it easy and affordable to fight your traffic tickets. Sign up with the code "TheTopher" for 10% off your first ticket whether you need it now or later: fight.offtherecord.com/TheTopher
Sound system test track playlist: open.spotify.com/playlist/3D9...
You can help support the channel by whitelisting TheTopher on your browser's AdBlock or becoming a patron: / thetopher
Facebook: / thetopheryoutube
I'm also the producer for the Winding Road KZbin Channel:
/ windingroadmagazine
Thanks for watching!

[@spicytuna62]

Mini trucks weren't a fad. They were inexpensive, fuel-efficient, and were often the right tool for the job. Most people never need a truck bigger than this.

[@McSquirts]

true but I looked at 3 rangers before determining these trucks aren't worth a dollar. They are terrible trucks.

[@JamesThomas-kx5sj]

​@@McSquirtsThat's a wildly unpopular opinion in the truck world

[@MasonLaw-ih6hd]

@@McSquirts500 bucks drove me around problem free for 5 years. Put 100,000 miles on a falling apart truck I took a chance on. Was great

[@McSquirts]

@@austinta4017 I mean they were just all beat up and I got sick of looking for a truck. They were all messed up, one didn't start, one had rust, and the last one looked like it was used in gone in 60 seconds, totally ravaged. They really do feel cheap though. compared to a chevy or even a toyota I think they feel better than ford

[@McSquirts]

@@austinta4017 I really wish I could get a nice new normal not unibody truck for $20k I guess I’m asking for way too much lmao. This country’s auto regulations are insane. That’s why ford has to make a unibody now. So lame

[@saucyp123]

So wild that this and the Maverick are only about 10 years apart, feels like 100

[@turkeyswissandcheddaronwho8203]

Like 20

[@pr1mefire]

well it's actually closer to 100 than 10 considering this ranger wasn't too different from the ones in the 90's, so it's kinda like a 30 year engineering difference.

[@nah3193]

They used that 4.0l V6 for wayyyy too long

[@robertblack6630]

@nah you do realize there the 1990's overhead valve 4.0 and 2000's overhead cam 4.0. So not exactly the same engines 60 hp difference and better mpg with overhead cam. One of best engines Ford built

[@mitch9521]

This is more of a truck than that 3 foot bed SUV thing ever will be.

[@michaelduffek2866]

PLEASEEEEEEEE WE NEED MORE REGULAR VEHICLES LIKE THIS I had a 2006 2.3L Ranger and I LOVED it!

[@DJWhitetailfluff]

I have a 99 Ranger 3.0v6 auto with jump cab and step side bed. It's got about 230,000 miles on it and it keeps on trucking. : )

[@TheyLuvJokester]

Me too, but ours is a 2008 version.

[@nickysarcade2174]

i got the 3.0 v6 2001 ranger edge, its been through a rough time with the old owner but now its gonna get loved

[@DJWhitetailfluff]

@@nickysarcade2174 YaY!

[@chrisg9383]

I agree!

[@StayCovert]

ASMR of old simple cars has been my thing recently. I want 15 minutes of all the shimmy’s and rattles exclusively

[@tyson8254]

you would absolutely love a no commentary pov driving video of my base model pontiac vibe

[@ronny-drz]

Had a 2007 Ranger 4-litre 200 hp V6 auto trans, 4x4, even had package with cruise, pwr windows & locks. It climbed off road like a mountain goat, zipped through snow covered roads in 4x4, with tons of torque - only problems, tie rod recall & horrific gas mileage, 12-14 mpg, but always started, easy towing, very reliable. Lots of folks liked the 2wd 2.3 litre 4 cyl with manual for mileage.

[@thecrew1756]

*2.3 L

[@Rowdie999]

I had that 2.3l in a mazda6 (if its the same engine, I think so) and was soooo reliable. I actually tried to blow it before I sent it to scrap( because of scrap). I couldnt do it, even with it having next to no oil and hitting rev limiter while it was cold in winter.

[@brandonforte148]

Couldn’t agree more! I have a 2002 with the 4.0 auto 4x4 thing is amazing in the snow but man the gas mileage is horrific

[@colbybailey2152]

I daily drive the 1993 with 2.3 manual and get around 23 mpg

[@ricochetey]

​@Rowdie999 Sounds like the 2.3 came a long ways my Dad had the 2.3 in a Pinto and Ranger it lasted less the 70k miles before it popped. He bought both brand new

[@robertfrippers]

Crazy timing! Just got back from a 2 week roadtrip in my buddy's 2008 Ranger 4.0 V6. Had to sit bitch the entire time getting squished for 7000km.

[@zauuury]

So the company i work at right now has a work truck for the mechanics to get around and its a 2006 ford ranger with manual transmission and its a RWD, let me tell you that package is quite the treat. It just wants to have fun without even trying lmao, its all badged out with the company name in red too that truck is iconic man.

[@VARITHMS]

I had a 94 with a 2.3L man. transmission. Had a blazing 98hp. I put 280,000 miles on it.

[@jbandt]

I enjoy the reviews on the 10-20 yr old vehicles. The stuff the most people can afford. LOL!

[@BB-ed4om]

These rangers are arguably better than any remotely affordable modern truck so it’s a win anyway.

[@BB-ed4om]

And they look great!

[@ronsmith4325]

It's crazy how archaic the interior looks when compared to what's available now. Things sure have changed.

[@firefly9838]

It's better than the new stuff

[@pofrof4910]

@@firefly9838 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@bruh-fn5dh]

@@firefly9838 my 03 Lexus looks more modern than this. Maybe bcz this is a truck ? Idk

[@TruckerGuy135]

That ranger has the same dash as the 1996 explorer.

[@Evan2]

@@firefly9838 Yeah, gonna have to disagree with you on that one

[@evandickson19]

My first vehicle was a 2000 Ranger in the same cab/bed configuration. Had the previous overhead valve 4 litre V6 and was only 2WD. This video actually made me miss that little truck. Core memory.

[@jish8681]

My dad had one of these for like 6 months. I drove around with all my friends in the back sideways seats it was a blast. Quite the silly vehicle

[@clover7359]

It has a "5" speed automatic, but it's more like a 4.5 speed. Gears, 1, 2, and 3 are all very close together, so 2nd is normally skipped unless you're wide open.

[@zauuury]

Bahahahhaa

[@bendino9016]

probably a 3.55 or 3.73 rear end. the 4.0 was a gas guzzler and first gear is like for mountain climbing lol. i still want this truck tho.

[@Bwillev]

You sort of noticed that around the 11 minute mark.

[@cesarpalmos8235]

No its a true 5 speed automatic, I had one and it was not acting like this at all, I believe the trans was slipping.

[@ddg2256]

If I remember correctly, the 5AT is geared the same as the old 4 speed for 1 and 3-5, and they basically inserted a new second gear between 1st and what is now 3rd. 2nd is very close to 1st and 3rd. When these eventually start failing, it almost sounds like a CVT up until 35 mph.

[@Micg51]

I used to own a 2007 Ranger with the 5 speed manual. Loved that truck, the size was perfect. I rented a new Frontier, that is already too big. You can easily park Ranger's of this era on city streets or tight parking lots, they are great. Just an honest truck.

[@newman8r45]

I'm so happy I managed to get a previous model frontier pro4x in 2018. I can't see how anyone can justify buying a new small pickup these days. They're way too expensive.

[@robertlucas8104]

Lots of great Ford fleet trucks, I personally loved the f150 with the 5L v8, the f250 with the 6.2 or 6.7 powerstroke, but the rangers were no nonsense. The older ones (2004-2010) are still running around today as fleet trucks, some with as much as 280k miles on the original power train.

[@zauuury]

Easily man those trucks were meant to haul, especially if you got a diesel truck

[@alb12345672]

5L V8 fits perfectly in any ranger. These rangers are 95-01 Explorers, and that engine was an option. All you need is the computer/5.0L/4R70W. You can even squeeze in the F150 xfer case with a bit of work. If it is different length than an Explorer, the driveshaft may need work.

[@ricochetey]

​​@@alb12345672A 5.0 5 speed from a Explorer would be a great swap

[@porkchopsandwiches192]

One of the best reviews I’ve seen on this channel!😊

[@fullcxwling]

One of my dream trucks tbh I absolutely adore older rangers

[@Turtisland]

This truck will never die. People STILL make videos of it.

[@mojorisin7317]

Awesome review and easy to watch. You're well articulate and knowledgeable and have a soothing voice. I appreciate your passion and enthusiasm in what your doing. You would definitely make a great journalist with Consumer Reports or Car and Driver. The Ranger is a great no thrills old school small truck. Very reliable if maintained and not expensive to buy or fix if needed and easy to work on. Definitely a breath of fresh air considering the now modern complicated and often unreliable small trucks. Ford has always been the leader in truck designs and dependability. The reason the F-150 is the best selling truck in the US and why trucks like this Ranger sold well too and are still on the roads today with over 200k miles. ✌🏽🇺🇲

[@Nikkk6969]

Went outside this morning to start up my old reliable 2001 4.0 in -27 Fahrenheit weather. Fired right while lots of other peoples newer vehicles couldn’t

[@powershift1365]

I've had three of these Rangers, the first being a 2000 Supercab/extended cab with a stepside bed, equipped with the OHV version of this engine (last year before the SOHC version that debuted for the Ranger in 2001), four speed auto and the 4x4 Off Road package with 4.10 gears. Don't remember too much from it tbh, that was back in ~2010 when I was still in high school. We did put a Gibson dual exhaust on it but that was about the only mods we did for it. About a year or two later after shuffling between cars and wanting another Ranger, I had another 2000 4x4 Off Road truck, this time with a straight bed and I believe despite it being a Supercab, no rear doors. It had the same transmission but with the 3.0 Vulcan engine mated to it. With 33" tires, it was certainly made more gutless than it would've been at stock height/tire size but I enjoyed it. My third Ranger was a 2006 Supercab, FX4 edition with the same powertrain that this one has. That had maybe 160k when I took ownership and when I passed it off to my brother it was around 220k miles. He still has the truck and the miles are still going up. As others have said regarding the fuel mileage, it was a little thirsty, especially with the 4.10 gears it had but never left me on the side of the road. With the SOHC version of the 4.0 engine, it had faults. One that mine suffered from was the thermostat housing is made of plastic and the plastic can crack and lead to coolant leakage. Also on the earlier years of the engine, about pre-2002, the timing chain guides/cassettes can fail and allow slack in the chain, leading to the chance of jumping cam timing and PTV interference. The guides were improved from 2002 onward but still was a chance of failure IIRC. I think the early versions of the engine that was used in the Explorers had intake manifold issues, until they redesigned the intake. I have a econobox car now for fuel economy but I still always loved the Rangers. I'm sure I'll get another one soon enough for a backup truck or runaround.

[@Evan_Moore61]

It’s really funny to read how many of us had a 2000 as our first. Mine was also a 2000 with the 4.0 and the 4x4 Off Road package. It wasn’t a stepside though. The timing chain guides did get better, but they still had a high failure rate. My 2005 had that issue at 185k miles. I’ve owned four Rangers, all 4x4 extended cabs with a 4.0.

[@jacobbenns6090]

My dad had a 1999 ford ranger 2.3 2wd auto that he got with 21,000 miles, and it was reliable as hell until he rolled it on his way to work at 389,000 miles about 16 years later, I grew up in the passenger seat of that old truck

[@thrivingepicnezz7025]

Love my 07 4x4 xlt with the 4.0l auto. I've had to do a lot of things to it. But it's never left me stranded. Had my timing done at only 100k miles due to bad previous owners not changing oil. Now she sits at 168k miles. Been a beast of a truck!

[@relevant1683]

I got a 2004 Ranger XLT a couple years ago. Had 83k miles, almost no rust, 4x4, 4L V6, automatic, for about $6500.

[@boeing_RBLX]

this brings back so many good memories, and the crash of 22..... BUT SO MANY GOOD MEMORIES! i now have a ram half ton

[@Dragunov302]

I love the “clunky” notches when changing gear with the column. It feels not smooth but “solid”

[@04dram04]

I miss these body on frame micro trucks. Seems like they will never come back

[@Mike28625]

I've got my father's red, 2001 4l v-6 stepside. I have to keep up on something new every few years but it's still running like a champ. Nice review!

[@jeepluv76]

I had a 1998 Ford Explorer XLT with the 4.0 SOHC 5-speed auto. It was a good vehicle sold it back in 2015 with 167K still ran great.

[@JimmyCasket02]

I had a 2004 ranger and everything was identical to this one it was a great little truck 240k miles ran like a top original engine and trans and I beat the hell out of it especially in the winter that thing was a blast to slide around in the snow I miss it dearly

[@paulguy2545]

Nice to see an American Car with the typical Steering Column-Shifter for a change! I've only seen that in the Ford Mercury, Late-90's/00's Chevy Impala cars you guys have over there. We've never had column-mounted shifters in our European cars.

[@benjammin8510]

I like them too, sadly alot of full size trucks are moving to console shifters (i.e. all f150s except the base model)

[@seanwhitlock_]

I love these Rangers. A lot of my family and friends had these, so I rode in them quite a bit growing up. My uncle almost sold me his when I was 16. Ended up not getting it, but I did get to drive it around. It was a '94, I believe. 2.3/5 Speed. 2WD. Crazy thing is, most of that interior is unchanged from the 1993 redesign. I could be wrong, but the door panels look identical, which is insane. lol Cool trucks, though. 😎

[@hunterpaksi1207]

Nice video! Man, seeing those rear seats brought back some memories. My Grandma had a ranger at one point a long time ago, used to ride in the back often. Completely forgot that those seats face inwards to each other lol.

[@mattcullen3063]

Honestly, one of my dream trucks I may want to get in the future. You get a small extension, V6, a 4WD switch, nice interior, good bed in the back etc. Seems like a cool small pickup for off road or driving in general. One of my dream pickups. It would the job done.

[@infinitoknight6577]

Another good video!! This made me feel better after today 😅

[@thegreattraverse7818]

Just an epic truck. I used to have an s10 and I miss it every day.

[@kylechellino2579]

This truck has got to go on the Winding Road Channel!

[@Norsea_]

I had the same motor in my 4th gen Explorer. I miss that thing so bad. This brought back some memories for sure.

[@Yowzoe]

⁠ 👏 great ride-along! Just picked up an ‘11 Sport 4.0 2wd auto with 102k for $9200, a rust-free cream puff in red on craigslist replacing my ‘93 Ranger with 225k. I got a PPI and it passed with only minor concerns. Love everything about it. New shocks made a hell of a lot of difference in the ride quality. The 207 HP engine supplies so much torque that inspires confidence in such a light vehicle, and though I drive gently most of the time it’s good knowing that it’s there to use. Mileage is not great, but driving mostly gently helps. I absolutely don’t miss all the complicated crap in the new crop of trucks, or their size. My only complaint is that I can’t figure out how to get rid of the *chimes* , the many nanny chimes. I'm not sure it's possible, but I hear that some techs have the codes to achieve this. Next little projects will be to secure my catalytic converter with a strap, find the best viper alarm system, and install a dash cam and a tailgate lock. Only then will I even consider driving to and parking in the big city. I’m also looking for the right OBD2 scanner (around $100 tops) to use with FORScan *with iOS/Mac* - if anyone has a solid recommendation to offer, I sure would appreciate it.

[@Dumontjon]

I have a 2011 4x4 with 4.10 gears and a manual transmission. It’s a really fun truck to drive.

[@xUltimatexInstinctx]

More cars around this era pleaseeeeeee! :)

[@mitch9521]

I had a 2011 4.0 automatic 2WD, good truck. I'd buy a manual one though if I were to buy another.

[@iannelli2448]

So happy to see this review! I just bought a used 2011 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 with the 4.0L V6. Southern-owned and manufactured, zero rust, 50k miles. Overpriced at $17.9k, but the competition to buy this truck was insane. I only drive 3k miles a year, so I expect this thing will treat my family well for a long time. So excited to get it shipped to my home in a few days!

[@iannelli2448]

@austinta4017 nah, according to the KBB value, it was actually a fair price - even a good price. I could probably sell it right now and make money on it. Plus, it has all of the creature comforts I personally want. I don't want a Maverick - I don't like them at all, plus all new "compact" trucks are too damn big. My Ranger is the perfect, compact size, and has an actual 6ft. bed unlike all the new shit made today. On top of that, this era of Rangers is known to go 250k+ miles. I only drive a few thousand miles per year, so this truck is going to last me a long ass time, and it'll pay for itself pretty damn soon. They're known to be very reliable, too. With a 4.0L V6 and 4x4, it is one of the last real, compact, reliable trucks ever made. I'd rather pay 17.9k for a classic like this than another 10k+ for some new bullshit.

[@iannelli2448]

@austinta4017 unfortunately, that's just how the market is right now, and it has been for a while. 15k would have been a bit more fair, but it is what it is. You know the saying, "They don't make 'em like they used to"? That's true in this case. In the couple weeks I've owned it, there have already been a handful of tradesmen that have flagged me down and asked if it was for sale, lol. These things go for $20k, especially in the condition mine is in. No rust and 50k miles? The thing is barely broken in. I get your point though. It shouldn't be this way. But I absolutely love the thing.

[@cruisingaltitude2976]

@@austinta4017uhmmmmm yeah. Any trucks past 2012 (with the exception of Toyota) are rolling piles of GARBAGE. I have many buddies with post-2012 trucks and they.are.nothing.BUT.ISSUES. I’d take a 2011 Ranger for 25K NO question. With proper maintenance they will outlive any newer truck by 100years guaranteed. Cheap plastic inflation B.S. on all the newer stuff. Ridiculous. Embarrassing. Mom’s got a 2008 Escalade NO AFM crap, it’s a tank.

[@cruisingaltitude2976]

@@iannelli2448any newer truck is a rolling pile of bolts 😂 folks are gonna save so much money on the new V8’s with cylinder deactivation for gas mileage, only to burn that money on a new engine when it blows up from cylinders turning on and off. Any newer V8 even V6 too is total JUNK. Cheap plastic b.s. these older trucks will go forever with proper maintenance. Not “ecobust” junk. I’m a Toyota guy all the way for this reason. YOUR RANGER you just bought is gonna run for a longgggg time man. Take care of her 💜

[@maroofr]

I love you!! Instead of "smoker" you said "cigarette enthusiast". Way to not put labels on people man!!!!

[@ngtflyer]

I just traded in my 2011 4.0L Ranger XLT 2WD truck a month ago. Failed emissions, needed a bunch of other work, was quoted outrageous numbers for the repairs so it was time. Everything is accurate. Kind of noisy on the highway, rattled a bit over bumps, but the brakes were very solid and responsive. Sounds like that truck needs the brakes bled and maybe a new set of pads/rotorts. Great reliable little trucks though and the 4.0L V6 makes a nice sound. I really liked it. Picked up a 2019 Nissan Frontier SV and I'm very happy. I will miss my old ranger though, simplicity, quirks and all.

[@iannelli2448]

I just bought a 2011 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 with the 4.0L V6. Paid a bit too much for it, but it's rust-free and only has 50k miles. I only drive like 3k miles a year. I figured it's the perfect "second vehicle" for my wife and I (no kids) as homeowners. Getting it shipped to my home soon. So excited.

[@antoniocoleman8380]

@@iannelli2448how much you pay?

[@mightsnipe]

I picked up a 2008 4.0L 4x4 Sport ranger for $2500 Cad about 18 months ago, rebuilt the bed, patched the cab floor (lifetime ontario rust), did various other miscellaneous repairs, now its my daily driver. I love it. So useful, so easy to work on, so easy to find parts. I can drive it up on ramps while INSIDE my regular sized garage because its so short. Used it the last 2 winters, just floats above the snow, never gotten stuck, and pull out other cars out of ditches regularily. Took it for a 6000km road trip this fall, not even a hint of any issues. I love this truck, I wish they still make them this size. Only thing that sucks is the fuel mileage haha

[@normalman23]

Hows gas mileage

[@matthewmoore661]

My favorite era of Ranger.

[@noahsteele5121]

I used to drive this route pretty much everyday and I gotta say I’m impressed you were not thrown around as much considering how bad those roads are lol. My f150 felt like a bucking bull some days

[@nathanmcdonald610]

Maybe the truck has worn out shocks or something. I used to own a 2003 Ford Ranger regular cab and it was incredibly rough riding compared to my 2011 F-150 FX4 Supercab I drive now.

[@kaydenehrhardt8062]

@@nathanmcdonald610 03 f150’s rode rough compared to 2011 f150’s too😎

[@nathanmcdonald610]

@@kaydenehrhardt8062 I've always found 1/2 ton trucks to ride better personally as they're not a full blow HD truck but they're larger and heavier "more stable" than a true compact like the old Rangers. My grandfather owned a 2000 and a 2003 F-150 back then and they both were a lot smoother than the Ranger I had.

[@nathanmcdonald610]

I had 2003 Ranger before I traded it in 2011 for a new F-150 5.0L. My Ranger was a great truck though, was a regular cab 5-Speed stick, the only downside was it had the gutless 3.0L V6 which, while reliable had the power of a small 4 cylinder coupled with the fuel economy of a big V6. Overall great truck though, having the standard transmission made it much more fun to drive than it had any right to be with that paltry 3.0L V6 powering it.

[@Evan_Moore61]

I always joke that the 3.0 has the fuel consumption of a V8 with the power of a 4 cylinder. It’s funny that someone thinks the same way.

[@TheyLuvJokester]

Yea these Rangers are pretty cool cars! We have a 2008 Ranger (RWD) and we got it for like $1500, and it even came with a manual!

[@tadinator1362]

I miss my '03 Ranger XLT Supercab. I had done some modifications to mine, and it really scooted. I can't say much about fuel mileage as I was really concerned about it as I am today with the price of gas. It wasn't fantastic on fuel with the 4.0L engine, but were well powered. I also had three other Rangers prior to that one. My '99 with the 3.0L flex fuel engine and a 5 speed was amazing. It was a different animal from the other 3.0L engine and sounded amazing and revved with ease -- not to mention, a beautiful sound. I easily got 28 mpg highway with it, and on my '01 with the 3.0L vulcan engine I managed 26 mpg. I also had one with the 2.5L four, it was rather unremarkable.

[@CTjacob13]

Same interior from 1995-2011. I miss my 1997 Ranger. 4.0L 5-Speed, regular cab, short bed.

[@BigBreakfast]

it's absolutely shocking how similar this is, on the inside especially, to my 1999 ranger xlt lol. the appeal is definitely obvious, it's just so freaky seeing all the elements i can pick out from my own truck's interior and even hearing the *beeeeeep* as you get out that mine also does...!

[@noyesyesno5345]

just traded my 08 fx4/sport 5 speed for a 2018 gti and god do i still miss that truck. unfortunately something in the clutch system on my truck was bunk and couldn't be fixed, either way definitely gonna pick another ranger up in the future.

[@DreamFireNostalgia]

curently driving and fixing up a 94 ranger. it in decent shape for PA and its what i got, been fun in the snow so far with now 4 wheel drive though XD

[@BrenSmith05]

i have a 2002 ford ranger, with the same motor, and the differences are absolutely insane..

[@deusvult6531]

I had a a 95 XLT V6. Loved it!

[@jyudat4433]

that ones optioned rly nicely tbh. a lot of these were 2wd base sport models here in canada

[@dipolararc4848]

So cool to see the same V6 from the early S197 mustang

[@freedomisntfree_44]

I miss my 02, same thing as this minus the face lift. Coldest a/c I’ve ever had in a vehicle period too…. Quick little truck that would go anywhere that’s for sure

[@compmanio36]

Love my 06 Ranger 4x4 with the 4.0. Will keep it on the road as long as I can considering how bad the new Fords are doing.

[@jackiecellchan]

Got a 09 xlt 4x4 with only 93k miles no rust for living in the Midwest only payed 9k and it has never let me down

[@aufgeschlossen5110]

love your vibe bro

[@alionus6783]

I daily a 2005 Ranger 3.0L V6 RWD Single cab, it's been pretty faithful except for a persistent misfire that i've been doctoring for years now. I love running around in it until I have to load up with my gf and anything in the cab and then it's cramped as hell, I'd have killed for an extended cab version of it but it was the only one in my price range at the time. She's gotten me through school and part of me wants to hold onto her but at the same time I kinda want a change. I have a '73 Maverick as my project vehicle but I'm currently just eyeing something more comfortable and spacious.

[@rcar_5019]

i drive a 1999 4.0L ford ranger and its fun to see how not much changed between the years, except for how I wish mine didn't have crank windows..

[@331Grabber]

I have a 06 Ranger 4X4 with the SOHC 4.0 and a 5-Speed. Mine is an XL with the short cab. It weighs only 3400 lbs. Thing moves pretty good. Though have to store stuff in the bed box on long trips due to basically no room behind the seats.

[@thegirthquake8574]

I always find it amazing that Toyota can squeeze nearly 300 horsepower out of their lazy 4L V6, and Ford only got 200. Truly outstanding work.

[@nathanmcdonald610]

Well, to be fair the Ford 4.0L originated in 1990 and the Toyota GR 4.0L started production in 2002. In 1990 the auto industry was still trying figure out a lot of issues with emissions robbing power from engines, many of these issues had been worked out by 2002. In 1990 the closest engine Toyota had to compete with the Ford 4.0L was the 3.4L V6 used in the Toyota T-100 truck and that made 190hp, even scaling up the displacement to 4.0L it still wouldn't be anywhere close to 300hp. Today Ford has a 3.3L V6 as a base engine in the F-150 that makes 290hp, its not a Ford vs Toyota thing, it's a technology then vs technology now thing.

[@sarahmathias9463]

I bought a '98 Mercedes ML320 recently. 215 hp from a 3.2L V6, in '98.

[@firstlast---]

@@nathanmcdonald610 ....but if you scale the displacement from 3.4 to 4.0 it's still going to have more power than the ford..

[@nathanmcdonald610]

@@firstlast--- maybe so but not by nearly as much as the OP Insinuates.

[@firstlast---]

@@nathanmcdonald610 👍

[@a.kblur04]

I swear each time I see you upload, you get closer and closer to where I live lmao it's so funny

[@Shade_91]

Maaan those back seats used to make me so carsick when i was a little kid lol

[@Rockybalboa541]

My first truck as a teenager lol loved it

[@kylebernier5814]

Love you topher

[@brucesendsshi]

i have a 89 ranger with a 4 speed manual and the same with my 93 i love them to death

[@Samophlan]

I added a supercharger to my 4.0 Ranger. It's a lot of fun. I love driving.

[@DementedDistraction]

I have an '04 XLT with the FX4 package. It has lousy mpg, you feel every crack and pebble in the road (I call it the boneshaker), all the plastics are flexy, creaky, and squeaky, there's panel gaps everywhere, I'm convinced whoever designed the seats wasn't familiar with human anatomy, road noise infiltrates the cabin through every crevice, and even on dry roads the tail kicks out really easily. However, it's nimble for it's size, fits well in the city, shrugs off the harsh Denver winters in 4x4 mode, easily scampers up steep mountain roads, and in an age where all new cars are completely digitized and sterilized, it's nice to drive something so simple and so analog. There definitely is a market for these trucks now; my Ranger has 133,000 miles on it, but it's in good shape save for a large dent in the side of the bed from the previous owner, and I routinely have random people coming up to me at gas stations and grocery stores asking me if I'm interested in selling it.

[@compmanio36]

You flip the dimmer switch all the way up and past the click to turn on the cab light in a Ranger. Older models had this labeled around the dial itself.

[@ak2112]

Wow, incredible flashbacks to my old 98' 4.0 SOHC explorer that I drove for 14 years.

[@nathanmcdonald610]

Unless you did an engine swap, your 1998 was the less powerful OHV 4.0L. They didn't switch the 4.0L to OHC until the 2001 model year.

[@FordFan-nr2uu]

@@nathanmcdonald610 Ford made the 4.0 SOHC an option in the Explorers in 1997, mostly in the higher trims like the Limited and Eddie Bauer. For a few years the Explorer had 3 engine options; the 4.0 OHV, 4.0 SOHC, and 5.0 windsor V8.

[@GreyCrowe]

Finally! A truck that actually fits on a trail.

[@COBHC8890]

I would take this truck over anything that's currently out today!!!! There's just something about older, simple vehicles that make me smile!!!! No bs, no overly complicated tech. Just drive, and enjoy a CD.

[@namemcnamerton4249]

Ford Ranger Engine: 4.0L v6 Transmission: 4 speed automatic 0-60: at some point Fuel economy: No Fun: 10/10 would drive like lunatic again.

[@jeremytroxel3046]

Love my 06 Ranger FX4!

[@mistah_nahamsha]

My friend has one of these. Awesome vehicle!

[@natsunakusunagi9214]

i love my girlfriend’s 2001 Ford Ranger 4.0L 4X4 XLT !! its awesome. my RSX type S and her Ranger make a great combo 😄

[@tywebb355]

I have that exact truck except I have the 2 wheel drive version. It's been very good to me. The 4.0 gets knocked for it's fuel mileage, but it does better than my old 3.9 Dakota did ......

[@tfriesen7872]

Unfortunately with the 2010/11 models the traction control can't really be turned off. It turns back on automatically around 10-15 mph from what I've been told.

[@ZachSadler-bp4wi]

The current gen Ranger was designed by Ford Australia and it's counterpart or cousin the Mazda BT-50 isn't sold in North American or Japanese markets.

[@SteezyDonJuan]

Luv my Ranger!

[@Freddy_Confetti]

Those trucks have awesome transmissions

[@sphlem]

my first truck was a 04 with a v6 4L 4x4, I miss it so much but let go at 270xxxkm when headgasket let go

[@blacksungod101]

I have a 1994 1st gen Explorer with the 4.0 it’s engine is amazing the transmission needs work buts she’s reliable asf

[@mikel2887]

@thetopher or sub topher. I have a 2004 2.3 5 speed here in milwaukee with 31,000 original miles. The whole truck is almost all original except for tires. No rust. I store it winters and it's a 2nd vehicle for me. If you want to drive it next time you make it out to elkhart lake or milwaukee area, let me know.

[@Brandon_-wd6op]

I had a 07 Ranger fire truck red extended cab 4.0 V6. It was a nice little truck but it came with the typical baggage a ford is associated with. Got rid of the thing a little over a year of owning it. I do have good memories with it though.

[@cesarpalmos8235]

What are you talking about?

[@nicocontreras2838]

I own a 2010 Ranger but the versions that came to my country in those years had an International 3.0 engine with around 160 horsepower and we didn't get the interior updates nor bigger engine options or automatic transmissions, instead we got a face lift and wider fenders wich they actually look great in my opinion but still, underneath it's the same truck that came out in 1998 i think. I'm in love with my truck don't get me wrong, it's my first car in fact, but it would have been nice to get some of the upgrades you got in the USA before the new version of the ranger came out

[@fexploder3281]

That is a pristine little pickup truck right there, I'd love to get something like that some day with a 2.3 4 cylinder 2WD or even better a 4.0 V6 4WD and a manual transmission. I don't know if I would trust the 3.0L engine though since it does not make much power for its size and it may have had cylinder head issues around the 2010 model year or so.

[@Deaftractor]

Nice black truck. Cool. I still have blue ranger 2011 truck. Near 160, miles. It has been replace clutch last year, also replaced gasket valve cover been oil leaking into spark plug tube. I still love this truck perfect budget for me and today vehicles hard to get budget new vehicles. This American all about money. That black ranger with v6 gas tank is 16 gallon should has 20 gallon to fit travel up to 400 miles but 16 gallon only up to about 340 miles. My truck is 2.3 4’cycle fit 16 gallon. No longer make end 2011. New rangers are not for my budget.

[@scottbrawley407]

2010 Ford Ranger XLT 4.0L V6 SuperCab 4X4!

[@livingsimple7005]

I love my ranger 189k miles still strong

[@adammoss2929]

i drive this car. i even have the exact same tire pressure sensor light on at all times!

[@bobg4657]

Michigan roads suck. $15K price for a 13 yr old ranger with 76,000 miles sucks too, but that seems to be the market. Good video.

[@zauuury]

Market is crazy nowadays, pretty good condition and not many around for sale probably, pretty low miles for a “transport” truck

[@sarachilders3973]

my son drives a manual 2009 ranger supercab its really nice

[@gradyluyt6998]

There’s a lot of cars from 2000-2010 that still feel modern and relevant against todays vehicles (as far as the interior). This one isn’t one of them.