Submitting my resume as Air crash investigator - "Watched thousands of hours of Air Crash Investigation"
@Getyourheadoutyourass4 жыл бұрын
LMAO... Professional with those hours
@laplebita5104 жыл бұрын
😂 me lmao
@holdencross59044 жыл бұрын
Funnily enough you need to get a degree in understanding of aircraft engineering.
@willyates91764 жыл бұрын
I’ll be your assistant. Watched many at least twice over. I can tell the investigators before they even think about the problem.
@tdickensheets4 жыл бұрын
Survivors 0
@napspones4 жыл бұрын
When you can't financially afford to become a pilot and you watched all the airplane crash documentary investigation. Anyone? ☺
@YourManJam4 жыл бұрын
Yes 😂
@niki184 жыл бұрын
its me...
@napspones4 жыл бұрын
@ like millions 😅
@theworldultimatenetwork23064 жыл бұрын
It's so true
@theworldultimatenetwork23064 жыл бұрын
@ 250,000 usd
@bryanrussell66793 жыл бұрын
One of the problems I see in the simulations of air crashes is the pilots flying the simulation are expecting something to go wrong. That anticipation makes them react quicker than what happens in real life. A good example of this was Captain Sully's flight that he landed in the Hudson River. All the simulations they ran showed the pilots being able to make it to a runway because they knew what was going to happen before it happened. There was also an incorrect assumption that at least one engine was still providing thrust, but they ran the simulations with dual engine flame outs too.
@zyh65663 жыл бұрын
Exactly 💯
@Sipods3 жыл бұрын
The benefit of hindsight is a wonderful thing but not the luxury pilots have in a real situation as you say.
@canineatnight60263 жыл бұрын
I felt like that floght water landing is over complimented
@cancerian1372 жыл бұрын
@@canineatnight6026 you don’t understand😄do you? That landing was a feat of a masterful flying, basically in a situation where everything went wrong, they did everything right. Yes, there was some luck involved, for example that they were at a sufficient height to make it over a bridge, but if anyone ever deserved a bit of luck…. It was them. You can’t over compliment none of this.
@mhdibm75152 жыл бұрын
The thing with the simulation vs reality in the hudson landing was , in the simulation they knew they had to convert back to the airport as soon as the engines stopped , in real life and with no prior training to such a very specific case who knows what others might have done , the guy saved the passenger and did a hell of a job up there and that what matters
@soulaymab.y60774 жыл бұрын
It's beautiful when different nations put hand in hand to help each other
@boboutelama57484 жыл бұрын
They don't. They just want to find their own citizens and protect their benefits. USA has financial benefits to blame every error possible on Airbus, and french have their own benefits to protect their industry.
@tritonlandscaping15054 жыл бұрын
@@boboutelama5748 And all nations get an excuse to flex their naval muscle, get some real life exercise, and project their power.
@liamward46184 жыл бұрын
It's almost always done because they're either owners of the airlines/planes involved or because they have some sort of link to those aircrafts/pilots.
@ivobudinovic70573 жыл бұрын
Yes it is...but there are still 15th century minded Countries who are trying to Take Foreign Territories like Albania and Mean Killer of Innocent People organizations like NATO....USA And EU until they exist there won't be Peace in The World,neither Humanity
@subatomic103 жыл бұрын
I was surprised Russia was involved
@sooph1e3 жыл бұрын
26:20 "The computer literally said "I can't function, Im confused" and it shut down." The computer is a whole mood.
@tazman86973 жыл бұрын
Probably a woman.
@justisaiah65413 жыл бұрын
@@tazman8697 bro what?
@DNTMEE3 жыл бұрын
@@tazman8697 Can't be a woman. Female maybe. Still, a female would first remind the pilot of all his faults and the "bad" things he has done. THEN it would shut down, sulking and waiting for him to say he's sorry and it's all his fault. When the pilot asks what the problem is, the computer would respond with "You know darn good and well what the problem is." At which point all the guys in the cockpit would roll their eyes and shake their heads knowing this will not end well.
@XSRKRXSRKRXSZKZXSZKZ3 жыл бұрын
NOT CHEERFUL NIHILISM
@kunglao33813 жыл бұрын
@@justisaiah6541 let him be
@ezragonzalez89364 жыл бұрын
Every airport is one of the world's busiest! 😆
@identitysecret18394 жыл бұрын
And every crash is one of the deadliest in aviation history
@danielleiapalucci16934 жыл бұрын
Identity Secret so true😂
@MatiKosa4 жыл бұрын
I laughed so hard :D
@Bokgat4 жыл бұрын
And every pilot is experienced
@2008cjam4 жыл бұрын
And every plane is one of the most advanced
@Jwww.2 жыл бұрын
as someone who fears turbulence, i cannot even begin to imagine the turbulence during that crash! horrific
@timwoodruff79843 жыл бұрын
Who else has bing-watched all these mayday documentaries during the lock down and is now freaked out about soon starting to fly again?!
@EssexAggiegrad20113 жыл бұрын
This isn't Mayday
@ezaahm5173 жыл бұрын
Xanax is the ultimate solution. Lol
@penyarol833 жыл бұрын
Starting to fly again, what you talking about. I’m staying put.
@zennabella16763 жыл бұрын
I STOPPED GETTING ON PLANES A LONG TIME AGO BECAUSE I HAVE HAD DREAMS OF PLANES COMING DOWN NEAR ME. THEY ARE REOCCURING DREAMS AND IVE HAD THEM SINCE I WAS A CHILD. I DID GET ON PLANES AS A YOUNGER ADULT BUT I BECAME SCARED OF THEM WHEN I WAS MIDDLE AGED. NOW IM OLD IM STILL SCARED OF GETTING ON ONE AND I SIMPLY WONT DO IT. BUT I DO SOMETIMES WATCH THESE AIR CRASH SHOWS. THAT ONLY MAKES ME EVEN SCARDER.
@jessebrook16883 жыл бұрын
Some of these are fairly well-researched and feel authoritative, while others do a skim of the documents and call it a day. They're a mixed bag, quality-wise. I have no fear of flying, as my country's airlines are some of the safest in the world. I would be more worried about spending up to 15 hours in an enclosed environment with someone whose desparation to get to a place overruled their illness. Statistically, flying is safer than driving. Realistically, some risks have to be taken. Personally, I'll be waiting until vaccination rates are over 85% before I feel comfortable sitting in the discomfort of an airline seat once more.
@sarathguttikonda40653 жыл бұрын
I am a air crash investigator with years of expertise in watching Air craft crashes under my belt
@leixx_17 Жыл бұрын
My heart aches while watching these disasters unfold. That sinking feeling when a captain realizes he has no control over his ac. He may know what to do to recover but the plane just won’t cooperate. 🥺🥺
@daniellesymons15694 жыл бұрын
Everyone has a different gift in life and pilots have to have a certain gift to be successful pilots. All admiration goes to them. And the pilots who saved lives and the ones who did their best but were unsuccessful. All respect to you.
@oceaneo46034 жыл бұрын
I kind of disagree with that. It is for sure an honorable job but they're not policeman or firefighter. Just like the passengers, their asses are on the plane too.
@sumukhverma14053 жыл бұрын
@@oceaneo4603 but the lives of the other people are in the pilot's hand dont forget that u would not want to be enemy with someone who is going to keep you hanging in air for the next 14 hour flight
@hmms52563 жыл бұрын
I remember one pilot interviewed said he thought the simulator made a mistake & stopped mid-emergency to ask what was going on and got ripped a new one by the instructor. Even in the simulations they have to treat it real because they're not going to have help when it does happen.
@martak9912 жыл бұрын
Océaneo 460 just like pilots, police and firefighters asses are also on the same vehicle if you will. I’m not about to go into a burning house whereas a FF will; thus putting him/herself in the same danger as the passenger/victims.
@christerry17732 жыл бұрын
@@martak991 little bit different. A vehicle can stop, and firefighter can escape in most Cases. Neither are an option when in the air
@rebelruth95824 жыл бұрын
The narrator has a lovely voice.
@anisguendouli63924 жыл бұрын
yes, you feel emotions while he is talking
@jeremycoe72554 жыл бұрын
@@anisguendouli6392 ooooi88iiiiiioii8878
@christinakaur87664 жыл бұрын
It's like butta 💙
@PolakInHolland4 жыл бұрын
Can't pronounce Antarctica to save his life though. So annoying.
@Sciffyan4 жыл бұрын
@Mapz Hmar Zate and Americans are talking like they have their mouths full of mashed potatoes haha
@renzo42964 жыл бұрын
I could only imagine how terrifying this would be, the ultimate ending. So scary.
@jamesdunning86503 жыл бұрын
It's remarkable how reliable planes are. Outside these few accidents.
@JimMork Жыл бұрын
"Few accidents"? That can't be referring to Indonesia. They had like six serious ones.
@HuyNguyen-ll9gz Жыл бұрын
@@JimMorkYou do know how rare airplane crashes are right?
@tylerrobertson47203 жыл бұрын
To everyone freaking out about the man intentionally stalling his plane, every student is taught stalls regular, it by no means is an uncommon thing to do
@cloedyy2 жыл бұрын
Pilots needs to flying more manual again than most of time the auto pilots does it. Stalling is most errors of pilots, they pull back the joystick and put the nose even more up and make the stall even worster, it's nose down, joystick forward and full speed and out of the stall but problem pilots just trained most in tranining and they know it's just a simulator and safe but in real flight, they do the oppsite than they should and that's why if pilots starting more flying manual the plane, they get used to it more and the more feel of the plane they are in
@HellcatMad2 жыл бұрын
and upset recovery. they may not have a lot of hours on recovery but I believe now they all have some training in upset recovery
@ripnob2 жыл бұрын
@@cloedyy Instead of making the flight more dangerous due to a pilot’s fatigue while flying manual most of the time, how about we train pilots to deal with stalling?
@petermuller58002 жыл бұрын
@@cloedyy The problem in the Air Asia crash was, the first officer was not prepared to fly the plane in "Direct Law" (all computers turned off). The captain just reset the vital Flight Computers in mid-flight, which is an insane thing to do. Normally, you only do this on the ground. The first officer was totally caught by surprise, while the captain was in the back of the cockpit, away from his seat. The aircraft stalled in a matter of seconds, since they were in a thunderstorm, plus there was miscommunication regarding the sidestick ("pull down" instead of "push down"). In short: Totally insane, resetting the Flight Computers in mid-flight in the middle of a tropical thunderstorm. The underlying cause, however, was bad maintenance of the aircraft. An electronic component was faulty for months, causing 23 error messages. 4 error messages alone on the fatal flight. The captain never would have tried this crazy stunt, would the aircraft have been properly maintained. Shame on Air Asia Indonesia for sending a faulty plane into the sky. 162 people died because of negligence.
@I_SuperHiro_I Жыл бұрын
@@petermuller5800 it’s Alternate Law
@boredgrass2 жыл бұрын
That all also provides an ADDITIONAL reason to appreciate the immense responsibility flight crews take on every flight AND to show that to them next flight!
@ailleananaithnid2566 Жыл бұрын
I have seen that video of the freight plane stalling multiple times; it never ceases to have an effect on me. Knowing that those people only have seconds is so sad.
@samuelc.4914 жыл бұрын
"for reasons unknown the plane began to climb-" dude the pilot probably freaked out and wanted to get above the storm
@robertgary35613 жыл бұрын
Or they hit an updraft. I've been in some where I've had to bury the nose to the ground to prevent a climb. TS's can have insane levels of updrafts.
@docskin4 жыл бұрын
The final Indonesia NTSC report stated that "a non-critical malfunction in the rudder control system prompted the captain to perform a non-standard reset of the on-board flight control computers. Control of the aircraft was subsequently lost, resulting in a stall and uncontrolled descent into the sea. Miscommunication between the two pilots was cited as a contributing factor." It further states the the weather was NOT a contributing factor in this accident. So nothing like the "conclusions" of this episode. This is why we wait for final reports before dramatising things we don't know about.
@natashajenkins-xh2xd7 ай бұрын
resetting the FCC in the middle of a thunderstorm would result in defective start parameters for the computer, due to the abnormal weather conditions.The FCC would then have no idea what "normal" was. At that point the plane becomes flyable by hand only, and since its pitch black outside, with wild random winds, the pilots would literally have no idea where the ground was and what constituted flat, straight and level.
@rahulsuryawanshi5950 Жыл бұрын
I have seen thousands of such documentary and its my all time favourite program . but the bad result of wathing all these ....I cant fly now . I cant even imagine m in plane . I have gained much much knowledge about planes and terminology related to it . I wish I would have been the part of NTSB 😊
@sre331l4 жыл бұрын
Re reading my earlier comments, there is one difference from the good old days. Analogue instruments. You see the Altimeter spinning round as you fall. Two pilots were frozen pulling the nose up, according to the black box. Expecting the computer to interpret their instruction to climb. Fly by cable planes, you control the axis. Nose down, means nose down. Fly by wire stick forward means descend.
@bascal1334 жыл бұрын
This was very informative, I liked how they illustrated some complicated flying principles
@josephbyrnside70514 жыл бұрын
The narration of a documentary matters.The narrator has the documentary literally in his or her hands.You will either catch the documentary or you will turn it off.I enjoyed the program.Thank you.
@robertgary35613 жыл бұрын
OMG! Don't make it like its some big deal to stall his small plane. Literally every time you fly with an instructor you do stalls. When I was teaching I"d sit with students demonstrating stalls more than a dozen times per day. Its a very normal training maneuver and is required on every checkride.
@mapples0073 жыл бұрын
Just reading this gives me anxiety. That would be my last lesson. Nope nope nope.
@equarg3 жыл бұрын
I hope with the inspection, removal, painting, and reinstalling on a helicopter once. When done, we all piled in, took up, and tested the helicopters auto rotation a few times. As a girl, I think I was the only person (besides the pilot) who did not freak out the first time The pilot even noticed that, I actually had fun every time he did that. He expected me to scream, and I just smiled the entire time. One fellow mechanic did scream a little the first time….and he was a “tough” guy. 🙄😒 Boys……….. I was always the one to get the snakes, spiders, and other critters that came into the hanger. Auto rotation…when the engine that spins the rotors turns off and only momentum and the force of the descending helicopter turns the top blades. We were leas then a few hundred feet off the ground so death was super unlikely. Just a “hard landing” and at worst a broken bone. As a slightly autistic female I actually enjoy turbulence and jolts. Wwwwweeeee!
@SonictheHedgehog768MilesPrower2 жыл бұрын
@Viki M lol facts too much pride that’s what happened to people who had too much pride and crashed plenty of flights yes yes I’ve been trained I never screamed the first time I’m a boy but I reacted 😮nose down full engine power, don’t hit the angle too hard or it will district aerodynamics or if we bank so hard that the gpws (ground proximity warning system) won’t read the stall that kids, we call a TOGA stall a over banking stall
@SonictheHedgehog768MilesPrower2 жыл бұрын
I have known about this since I was 10 years old so yeah I wasn’t scared at all and knew how to react infact I knew so much that this girl who wanted to become a pilot I knew much more than her at only 10 years old I knew about rudders ailerons stalk TOGA stall bank angle 45. 50 degrees bank and I already know about sink rate warnings like that pull up terrain terrain don’t sink I know those warnings and I was 10 years old the pilot was surprised I knew already😎I did not even need a test lol but when it’s time to react I react I get away that pride that you have too much and react thank you😃 oh and vertical stabilizers hehe😅 and anti icing and heating and knew how to react Incase of a engine fire ok let’s do this let’s say your in a stall and you have an engine fire you don’t put too much power put the maximum you can not the max because then you will explode the engine it won’t work anymore so put the nose down not too much force, gently. And boom! You have recovered but in a TOGA stall ehhhh not sure bout that ok you do this pull up this type of stall requires pulling up ngl but pull up gently and then your good and that was how much 10 year old me knew thank you
@catatanbethari12264 жыл бұрын
Today... One of Indonesian Aircraft, Sriwijaya Air with Flight Number SJ182 crashed in Kepulauan Seribu... Innalilahi wa inna ilaihi Raji'un... May God have mercy to them...
@stevegeorge76884 жыл бұрын
Semoga semua jenazahnya segera di temukan, amiin...
@ozymandias44794 жыл бұрын
Ah ada org indo juga ntn ginian , tumbe
@catatanbethari12264 жыл бұрын
@@ozymandias4479 Aslinya sering nonton cuman jarang komen aja... 😂
@WhatALoadOfTosca4 жыл бұрын
Why do they make these programmes without knowing what happened? Why couldn't they wait until final reports are released. 40 minutes of speculation...
@aaronparker1114 жыл бұрын
That’s the point...
@zeusk1014 жыл бұрын
They do know what happened. Watch the video. Or wikipedia :The report stated that the sequence of events that led to the crash started with a malfunction in two of the plane's rudder travel limiter units (RTLU).[139] A tiny soldered electrical connection in the plane's RTLU was found to be cracked, likely for over a year, causing it to intermittently send amber master caution warnings to the electronic centralised aircraft monitor (ECAM)-with the plane's maintenance records showing that the RTLU warning had been sent 23 times over the previous year, but was always solved (and never further investigated, which could have addressed the underlying electrical problem) by resetting the RTLU system.[140][141][142] On this flight, the RTLU issue sent an amber caution warning four different times, and the first three times that the ECAM system gave the warning "Auto Flight Rudder Travel Limiter System", the pilot in command followed the ECAM instructions, toggling the flight augmentation computer (FAC) 1 and 2 buttons on the cockpit's overhead panel to off and then on.[143] This procedure did clear the amber master caution warnings for each of those first three warnings.[144] Specifics in the report indicate that French First Officer Rémi Emmanuel Plesel was at the controls just before the stall warning sounded in the cockpit indicating that the jet had lost lift. Investigators also found that, just moments earlier-on the fourth occurrence of the RTLU warning during the flight-the Captain chose to ignore the procedure advised by the ECAM instructions, and, instead, left his seat and reset the circuit breaker of the entire FAC,[140][145] unintentionally disengaging multiple flight control systems, which would have to be turned on by the pilots after the circuit breakers are reset.[146] This circuit breaker is not on the list of circuit breakers that are allowed to be reset in flight,[37]:106[l] and disabling both FACs placed the aircraft in alternate law mode, disengaging the autopilot and stopping the automatic stall protection and bank angle protection.[147] The FAC is the part of the fly-by-wire system in A320 aircraft responsible for controlling flight surfaces including the rudder. Without the FAC's computerized flight augmentation, pilots would have to "rely on manual flying skills that are often stretched during a sudden airborne emergency".[148] When the crew was required to fly the Airbus A320 manually, there was an unexplained nine-second delay between the start of the roll and either pilot attempting to take control.[149] After nine seconds, the aircraft was banking at a 54° angle. The report did not specifically conclude that pilot error caused the crash[150] while detailing the chain of events leading to the loss of Flight 8501. However, one of the investigators, the NTSC's Nurcahyo Utomo, referred to an apparent miscommunication between the pilots (based on the recordings on the cockpit voice recorder) and said that the malfunction should not have led to a total loss of control had they followed the recommended procedure.[4]
@cdlgrainger4 жыл бұрын
@@zeusk101 It should be further noted that the captain had witnessed the resetting of the FAC's on the ground by an engineer, and decided to try the reset airborne. This is not an ECAM driven procedure.
@hamidrazavi8224 жыл бұрын
Thanks...as soon as i saw your comment, i left
@cdlgrainger4 жыл бұрын
@@hamidrazavi822 The same alarm sounded and the same ECAM memo displayed three more times at 06:09, 06:13, and 06:16 respectively, totaling four times all together. At 06:16, Flight 8501 was cleared to climb to FL 380 but received no response.
@snackgila4 жыл бұрын
I lived in west borneo and born in here. Was watching a lot of clouds all my life and i know, the weather will be so much crazy in here. It changed every 30 minutes during january and many thunderstorm and lighting strike with heavy windy suddenly happened. Not yet, the moon gravity in here so strong. During november , december , january , february, the hightide so unbelieveable strong. Caused a flood during moon calendars from 28 to 7 ( moon calendars ) When the plane crash near the borneo, i thought they have trouble with weather because culumnobiuos clouds are so high level formation during december and january february. But i read news, it was involved human error connection between pilot and airtraffic controlled. Now, this video explained something
@jeffarmstrong30174 жыл бұрын
Something about Indonesia and planes which scares me
@Sylinnilys4 жыл бұрын
Several modern accidents and a general perception of it being a backwater.
@sre331l4 жыл бұрын
A lot of European pilots fly there to get their hours up. Successful pilots there have flown into postage stamps on hillsides in turbo props. The issue isn’t the pilots, it’s the weather and the maintenance, companies have been known to cut corners, but that was true into e US, rogue uncertified spares elivator screws un lubricated at Air Alaska for example. US pilots in my view, rely too heavily on technology, as did the France pilot when his air speed indicators failed,and his copilot was holding the aeroplanes nose up, causing it to stay stalled, until it hit the deck. Someone criticised an air Egypt pilot for not disengaging the autopilot in a 737max, but it re-engaged unprompted and forced the nose down repeatedly. Boeing blamed pilot error, it happened again. The attitude against non US pilots by US media, caused more deaths. Patriotism kills people. Just ask your military how many people have died, sticking your noses where you have no business.
@peace570s4 жыл бұрын
You wrote what i always think.
@drknow19974 жыл бұрын
Aye that just cross my mind. I say I never going dem parts for shyte . Don’t trust them planes out deh
@geoffcrumblin75054 жыл бұрын
I recall Lion Air is banned from flying to several countries.
@lovedefeatsus4 жыл бұрын
Pilots should be doing 1 manual flight a month in order to not have their skills degraded over time.
@ondinehd68893 жыл бұрын
Yes, investigators keep repeating that, and reaching that conclusion after many air disasters. So, why is the industry not implementing this recommendation, which in many instances, might not only save lives, but save thousands of dollars to the industry??
@harold5623 жыл бұрын
Called money, profits, and greed. Some companies can't even afford to take planes off for regular maintenance at times. Every drop of fuel saved by the computer is a dollar saved. All hail going green.
@jenifyw23663 жыл бұрын
Or just more disaster. Because every manual flight might be a chance for human error
@l456tatertot33 жыл бұрын
Sairode The problem with you “green nuts” is you literally have no idea what you’re talking about, did you know that the insane “new green deal” calls for the END OF AIR TRAVEL? There is no other fuel source to fly planes other than fossil fuel. Try educating yourself.
@helwatywahab52363 жыл бұрын
This is realy air crash investivigation from nat geo?
@EnduringFoliage4 жыл бұрын
26:20 me too computer, me too.
@Free_Krazy4 жыл бұрын
It's been a while since I've seen one of these, thanks for the upload! Ever since I watched a marathon of MayDay literally the night I got off a plane as a kid I've loved the genre, and developed a fear of flying lol
@CaptainYokkiller2 жыл бұрын
While airline disasters like these are horrible tragedies it’s nice to see that in events like these all nations put differences aside to help look for survivors
@GamersComputer3 жыл бұрын
For anyone interested, the 'Aireon' technology for real-time airdata is still being deployed to this date with the latest, and largest so far, being deployed for Isavia ANS (covering 5.4 million square km of controlled air space). It is also deployed across Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata's oceanic airspace
@1pasupaty Жыл бұрын
And yet glitch in software lead to both boeing and airbus to loose control and stall over Java sea due to autopilot.
@noneanymous34654 жыл бұрын
Came hete after Sriwijaya video.. Again Indonesia? God I can't explain theur fear.. My deepest condolences 😭
@colinhenry19683 жыл бұрын
Greetings from Scotland, thank you for this it's a brilliant quality too
@valeriegriner56444 жыл бұрын
They finally nailed it..."too much technology in the cockpit!" It is NOT the same as "pilot error!"
@GamersComputer3 жыл бұрын
It's too much techonlogy in conjunction with pilot error. As soon as the technology fails and the aircraft is in the hands of the pilot, they lack the necessary experience of flying the aircraft manually.
@papaboi99832 жыл бұрын
@@GamersComputer no most of these crashes happen at night bro...like fr u have no visual reference to the horizon there r situations where u loose full hydraulics yet pilot managed to land it just coz it was morning and there was a reference horizon
@LetztezBatallion2 жыл бұрын
@@papaboi9983 If a pilot needs a visual reference then it is pilot failure. Unless literally every single system aboard the plane fails pilots have artificial horizons in the cockpit indicating their attitude. It's the blue/brown screen they show at around 20:04. And airline pilots re trained to fly IFR, using the instruments, not visual or internal references exactly because those are utterly unreliable during flight.
@discoverwithlastbkenya21314 жыл бұрын
Great videos thanks for uploading. Kindly add more videos love from Kenya🇰🇪🇰🇪
@theworldultimatenetwork23064 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that. We added 5 full documentary today with HD quality. There is more to come. Subscribe to our KZbin channel to receive latest Videos Glad to have you in my KZbin community
@discoverwithlastbkenya21314 жыл бұрын
@@theworldultimatenetwork2306 count me in...😍
@theworldultimatenetwork23064 жыл бұрын
@@discoverwithlastbkenya2131 Welcome to your Channel
@theworldultimatenetwork23064 жыл бұрын
Did you see our Last videos
@discoverwithlastbkenya21314 жыл бұрын
@@theworldultimatenetwork2306 not yet you uploaded new one?🤔 I didn't get any notification please
@MrRedsjack3 жыл бұрын
Modern autopilots are very capable to recover from almost any stall, also planes have multiple sensors in case of a failure in one. Unfortunately too many times when one sensor has a problem rather than switching to the working sensor and keep the autopilot running pilots take over manual control while completely caught off guard. Planes needs an emergency "stall recovery button" like reactors have an emergency scramble button.
@Platanis20084 жыл бұрын
-Tower, change height to 99 planes. -Ok. -Tower, change height to 100th plane. -No, too crowded...
@collinsnider41793 жыл бұрын
"This may change the way you feel about flying" (me snickering)
@madden40003 жыл бұрын
I just put my hand on my face and was like really 😒🤣🤣🤣
@Drummondmbf1003 жыл бұрын
Not really lol I still will not fly...js☺️👋
@Sincerely.angelic4 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. I’m 13, definitely gonna be either a crash investigator or an Aviation expert. 💃🧍
@kalvin35584 жыл бұрын
Good luck!
@Sincerely.angelic4 жыл бұрын
@@kalvin3558 aaaa this made my day thank you
@GG-kn2se4 жыл бұрын
Doubt
@Sincerely.angelic4 жыл бұрын
@@martinnuman1097 Well that’s terrifying 😃
@aliceprecilla82713 жыл бұрын
Same here
@awadramy13 жыл бұрын
Did this man just fly a aircraft and stall it intentionally for the sake of the investigation? That's dedication hahah
@marv50783 жыл бұрын
Haha I was thinking the same thing
@jack.p3 жыл бұрын
It’s a normal maneuver, it’s taught to students after 5/10 hours flying so they know how to recover. If you know how to recover properly it’s completely safe.
@xiwei-huang3 жыл бұрын
I wonder what you mean by haha when it comes to a pilot 'intentionally' stalling a plane full of people like you said.
@awadramy13 жыл бұрын
@@xiwei-huang it wasn’t full of people when he intentionally stalled it but he did it for the investigation alone while flying.
@lindseymatthews8633 жыл бұрын
It was a simulator 🤦🏼♀️
@vinaychakraborty86353 жыл бұрын
Why was the course of the flight not changed when it was known that weather conditions are not conducive for flight? Its human error at many levels.
@miguelalonsodelcastillo2 жыл бұрын
sad, interesting and everthing, but i wanted to listen to the black box...
@susiearviso30323 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing as perfection in aviation. The crashes will continue to happen. Human beings are subject to error and failure. They make mistakes whether they are pilots or Maintenance. Humans get angry, they make mistakes. They get tired, they forget, they aren't perfect.
@elshan1153 жыл бұрын
Well said.
@josephamego15282 жыл бұрын
Isn't that why computer were put into the aircrafts systems. and still crashes happen.
I think it would help pilots if they had more 3D awareness training. The first example I give is a simple one. I have ridden a high performance recumbent amongst road bikes quite often. The sensations and performance capabilities of the bikes are very different. The recumbent can stop shorter, turn quicker and is faster down hill and on the flat. To ride with road bikes I have to be very careful not to make it unsafe for them. The most dangerous parameter is stopping distance and sensation. The road bike rider loads their hands and upper body, all very sensitive to load and trained to not exceed the maximum approximately 1/2G maximum braking force/-ve acceleration a racing bike can make. The recumbent applies force via my feet and bum mainly, both areas used to 1G loads separately so my sensation of a 0.3G deceleration is very low. I never caused a crash with uprights. I think pilot training should include 3D awareness training on a trampoline or similar device throughout their flying career. This should significantly improve situational awareness.
@Thegamerfailer4 жыл бұрын
40 minutes to explain the aircraft stalled and crashed.
@cdlgrainger4 жыл бұрын
The captain decided to reset to the FAC circuit breakers (CB), having previously seen this action being performed by a ground engineer, and believed that it was okay to perform this action in flight. However, resetting FAC CB's was actually prohibited in flight. This was the cause, and this was not covered in this so called documentary.
@kumarsatish98404 жыл бұрын
Good kzbin.info/www/bejne/hoSzmqWhl7Nnl68
@Sylinnilys4 жыл бұрын
@@cdlgrainger There were more things than that. There is a list of something like 6 direct causes, aside from things outside of pilot control or mistakes made on that regard. Then more speculation. Not fun. Mistakes were made.
@cdlgrainger4 жыл бұрын
@@Sylinnilys Agreed there was a recurrent theme in the tech log, and every time it was the usual tested found satis and returned to service. On that score I agree, HOWEVER ... the cause of the upset was the decision to reset the FCUs in flight having observed it being done on the ground, and THAT is dangerous. There is no FCOM reference to that action anywhere, and it is specifically prohibited by Airbus, so this was test flying with a full load of pax.
@yankeeswin42664 жыл бұрын
@@cdlgrainger what does that mean
@johndeer65433 жыл бұрын
"The plane descended 8,000 feet in half a minute and began to turn left. The airplane then ditched into the sea killing everyone on board. The crash was caused by a rudder failure. The pilots also misunderstood each other during the emergency, causing them to pitch the aircraft up even further, worsening the stall." ----------------- Nothing of this or any details about the reasons of the disaster are mentioned in this video. It is more a video about the earlier Air France crash and contains little information about the Air Asia crash.
@CougarCat21 Жыл бұрын
Yeah. This video is terrible. Never explain the REAL reason for the crash and it has nothing to do with the weather! The ECAM message came out 3 or 4 times and the captain reset the circuit breaker which turned the place to Alternate law. And the rest is history. (Burnt circuit board)
@DrummerJake-cm5ir4 жыл бұрын
I flew to see my mom in south Carolina, nice ,and clear, when it was time to fly back home, it was thunderstorming ,and it was also night time, I'll say i was terrified to say the least,especially because I'm scared of flying even in clear weather
@witheeeeeerx4 жыл бұрын
Nice to see you alive
@briangarcia79774 жыл бұрын
i feel pity for the lost souls...and it must be really hurting for the family member...may God Comforts be with them...
@hi-wt7lg4 жыл бұрын
i have seen birds stalling & recovering, sometimes stalling by air/ birds, sometimes itself to play with wind , recover and find right place to sit and reach there from that controlled predicted stall
@jesspavlichenko57453 жыл бұрын
Birds are simply amazing aviators
@jayd18773 жыл бұрын
I don’t understand how after all this time they still don’t have video recordings in an aircraft.
@Nawalexplores3 жыл бұрын
Good point
@johanna56883 жыл бұрын
They do. It's called a black box. Only they don't show the public.
@KyllingThyme3 жыл бұрын
@@johanna5688 Black boxes don't record video you utter mong.
@Se0ng3 жыл бұрын
Based on black box and the data in the plane, they construct the video
@이나나-u4d3 жыл бұрын
@@johanna5688 dude, black box only recording the voices inside the cockpit.
@scottmoseley51224 жыл бұрын
Waste of time. No conclusion and then unrelated breakaway topics covered ad nauseum.
@lalabullshit97444 жыл бұрын
A secret to NO ADS . A. Skip The Video To The End B. Hit Replay Boom , No Ads ! Your welcome
@pauldarlington55894 жыл бұрын
@@lalabullshit9744 I"m guessing that you don"t understand what ad nauseam means.
@azizmartin4 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Final investigation report made it clear, this is another human factor related accident , crm breakdown ,violating sop and some lack of skills escalated by Fly by wire system. I am an a320 pilot and a CRM instructor, I regret to say one more time after AF447 June2009 , It is human factor , again.
@grumpymrpug92824 жыл бұрын
@@pauldarlington5589 Ad nauseum is getting sick from too many KZbin ads 😁
@lucassteen40504 жыл бұрын
Just Watch theflightchannel, it shows what happened.
@alfin983 жыл бұрын
i remembered that plane crash, at that time i was 4th grade in primary school and just about to enter 5th grade, when i saw the news i begin to get interested in airplanes.
@bestbirdallround4 жыл бұрын
I was on a flight in the USA and it hit an air pocket literally felt like the plane was going to roll scary
@Severed894 жыл бұрын
Same thing happened to me I was flying from Boston to Africa and we hit a pocket and plane dropped rapidly. I was actually watching air disasters the night before boarding to. All you heard was everyone take a deep breath
@heyRolleen4 жыл бұрын
@@Severed89 oh hell no. stop the plane let me out. If that happened to me on a plane you wouldnt be able to pound a needle up my butt with a sledge hammer!
@gabrielchinzz33323 жыл бұрын
It's nothing,it's just a turbulence,you did be surprised Planes are designed to take on huge gust of winds
@bendavid8404 жыл бұрын
How amazing is it that in this video they were prototyping LIDAR and here I am sat watching this with one of those on the back of my phone.... mad
@harlequin75 Жыл бұрын
This is NOT Mayday.
@kevinmalone32102 жыл бұрын
The woman talking about Air France flight 447 was making it sound as if this flight got into more difficulty than what actually happened. The co-pilot messed up by putting the aircraft into a climb when it wasn't necessary. All he had to do was fly straight and level and they would've been OK. They weren't flying through severe turbulence, but through a storm that was not difficult to fly through.
@BrandonBurch4 жыл бұрын
Invisible turbulence?! See, that's why I am afraid of flying. When I drive, I don't have to worry about invisible vehicles.
@dude_whats_even_happening4 жыл бұрын
Air travel is the safest mode of transport still. The reason that the news talks so much about plane crashes is because they are so rare.Although I got your joke.Got a good chuckle out of it
@penyarol833 жыл бұрын
@@dude_whats_even_happening everyone always says that but it gives me no comfort. If something, anything happens in a plane it is a terrifying event. I would rather just not travel so much in general. Also I’d like to see the stats saying trains are more dangerous than planes.
@FatiFleur-jn7ky2 жыл бұрын
@@penyarol83 If it's deaths per billion miles flown then planes win. But if it's deaths per journey then trains are nearly 6 times safer.
@LetztezBatallion2 жыл бұрын
@@penyarol83 In 2021, 893 people died in railway-related accidents in the US. Of that 893, 20% were trains crashing into either vehicles or people who were crossing the rails so only 714 people died on the trains themselves. By contrast, 134 people died in comercial flights during the same year (2021) WORLDWIDE. Since the above numbers of railroad deaths are for the US only, I searched for death statistics of flying in the US too. These are the results: "The lifetime odds of dying as an aircraft passenger in the United States were too small to calculate. The number of civil aviation deaths decreased from 452 in 2020 to 349 in 2021. All but one of the 349 deaths in 2021 were onboard fatalities. None of these deaths involved a commercial airline. Major airlines (scheduled service) experienced no onboard fatality and a fatal accident rate of 0.0 per 100,000 flight hours in 2021." TL;DR of the above text: 349 private pilots died while flying their planes, but no passanger plane/comercial airline had any fatalities. So in terms of pure, raw numbers flying beats every single other method of transportation out there. There is no one that comes even closer. But as Fati Fleur posted, the problem comes comes when you take a look at these statistics in terms of "how many died per instance of travel". Most of these 714 deaths aboard trains were "individual". Something happened and a person died while other passangers probably never learned of the fact that someone died at all. While on the other hand almost half (62) of the 134 deaths worldwide were from a single crash: Sriwijaya Air Flight 182. Put another way: You have more chances of traveling on a train where someone dies but nothing happens to you specifically, while your chances of traveling on a plane that has fatalities is far, far smaller, but your chances of dying on such a plane are far higher.
@penyarol832 жыл бұрын
@@LetztezBatallion yeah. No flying for me. I'm a primate, not a bird. Thanks.
@maybe27684 жыл бұрын
Every airport is one of the world's busiest airport.
@spacegoat_3d8014 жыл бұрын
Not Des Moines
@livininthevalley3 жыл бұрын
Was a strong updraft followed by a strong downdraft. Subsequent effect of the updraft created the stall, and the downdraft eliminated any ability to recover.
@EssexAggiegrad2011 Жыл бұрын
It wasn't weather related
@Suburp2124 жыл бұрын
Why Aren't the Pito tubes made more redundant, better heated, tighter watched by instruments etc?
@robertosucci11514 жыл бұрын
For the past 3 1/2 years everytime I search aircrash investigation this is there
@ScotsmaninUtah4 жыл бұрын
Despite the apparent theme of this video , which I though was supposed to be about air Asia 8501, severe weather was NOT a factor in its crashing, and neither was it for the air France disaster. In addition, both aircraft were of an Airbus design , and in both cases the FO and Capt entered opposte up and down flight inputs via their joystick controls, which effectively led to a stall and subsequent crash. Note: Boeing aircraft do not employ joysticks as input controls. What we have in the air Asia crash is a failure to operate and fly the aircraft correctly .
@docskin3 жыл бұрын
They're sidesticks, not "joysticks". Sever weather most definitely was a factor in AF443, causing the pitot tubes to freeze and give erroneous air data which triggered the whole sequence of events. I agree that it wasn't a factor in this one. I would further say that AF443 was due to a lack of basic airmanship. If there are two inputs on both sidesticks on Airbus aircraft you get a loud DUAL INPUT announcement but I'm not sure if this happened in AF443.
@patriciaramsey52943 жыл бұрын
You are soooo right! I was not impressed with this program. Its like listening to my old math teachers. The narrator put me to sleep.
@josephamego15282 жыл бұрын
Has anyone ever noticed that when the cause of a air crash is found out or given those incharge always say that we must make sure that this doesn't happen again, but it doesn't does it, there's always another one, then another one. Flying is reported as being safer than driving a car, the problem is planes are being made bigger so when they crash more people are killed.
@zorgius4 жыл бұрын
What? Where's the communications in the cockpit from the black box?
@sanskarsrivastava56994 жыл бұрын
Well the GPS for plane is now a reality and for normal people it's "flight radar 24" 👍
@florianmeier31864 жыл бұрын
No flightradar 24 is based on ADS-B not GPS. GPS data can be part of the information sent, but the sending is done via transponder radio, which is not directly related to GPS.
@JimMork Жыл бұрын
So reminiscent of how AF447 dropped into the Atlantic in 2009. That same equator and its storms. I simply would never take any flight like that. I'd drive north of equator or take water transport. Has to be some solution. But this is dredging up a memory from some time back. EU banned Indonesian airlines for years from its airspace. Too many needless cases of bad aviation. I AM remembering that correctly, true? These pilots do not seem dubious. But then there's what they did. Climbing that fast? Is that what good trainers tell pilots to do? In simulators, does that attitude ever work? Fighter planes can do a rocket imitation. But my lay understanding is that you can't stand a commercial airline on end.
@MegaGronis3 жыл бұрын
Go around thunderstorms . Never ever try to set down an aircraft in a thunderstorm.
@amanal-kabbani27453 жыл бұрын
Very valuable video..and it tells a lot of stories about aviation tragedies and the science behind them..
@priyalamlani80124 жыл бұрын
You should have released the information from black boxes too.
@ShamDiscTV5K Жыл бұрын
almost every airport is one of the busiest in the world
@katiaouafi73074 жыл бұрын
Great vidéo
@theworldultimatenetwork23064 жыл бұрын
thanks
@OulyHussain Жыл бұрын
This is the problem when you rely too much on technology
@langothebot63644 жыл бұрын
keep making great vids
@Stichting_NoFa-p3 жыл бұрын
1:17 Hottest place on earth? It's at most 30 degrees, doesn't come close to the 50 degrees in the middle east.
@pop5678eye3 жыл бұрын
Normally the procedure for stall recovery is to immediately push the nose forward (reduce angle of attack for both better airflow and be able to use the control surfaces) and increase engine power. This breaks down unfortunately when the angle of attack is so extremely high that you neither have enough relative flow to even use control surfaces to pitch the nose down nor are your engines powerful enough to compensate. (think an airliner attempting to climb vertically as the most extreme example) Ideally an airplane's aerodynamics can recover even from this on their own by spinning down enough for the nose down pitch... but it will only work if you have sufficient altitude for such recovery and the pilots don't try to override it. I'm not blaming pilots in most situations on this. Most of the time they have limited time to diagnose any crisis and recognize the correct input, no different than a surgeon doing their job on an operating table for an emergency patient.
@msmiami2123 жыл бұрын
How could a pilot try to override it? and why would they attempt to?
@christerry17732 жыл бұрын
I would argue there not that similar. A surgeon has a series of staff around him to Aid. Plus their on the ground and know their own lives are not on the line.
@Pain4yourmind Жыл бұрын
If your over 30 thousand feet and can’t recover a stall effectively regardless of weather conditions before hitting the ground then your not worthy of flying a plane. The pilots in this case were 100% at fault. You should be able to fly a plane from A to B without electronics or at least minimal electronics, GPS and altitude only for example. This should not have happened.
@AhmadFareez2 жыл бұрын
I remember that december 2014 is the date when massive flood happened in Malaysia. The weather was extremely cold.
@miguelsalami4 жыл бұрын
This plane was not authorized to climb to a higher altitude but the pilots did it anyway. Pilot error it seems is what brought this plane down. Had they stayed on coarse the stall would have been avoided. I Question ALOT of pilots poor judgement. Maybe too many of them are packing bottles aboard. An alcohol sensor in the cockpit would probably benefit everyone.
@seeb8057 Жыл бұрын
Can you imagine flying in darkness seeing lightning ever couple of seconds? You would be panicking
@IK7.3 жыл бұрын
Correct me If I am wrong, Was it the updraft or the pilots that took the plane at 38k altitude to, at the point It reached a complete stall?
@taufanyr43824 жыл бұрын
perhaps this also happen for recent Airplance crash SJ-182 (Sriwijaya Air : Jakarta - POntianak)
@dyworking4 жыл бұрын
Pilot didn't have experience to understand that loss of airspeed would accelerate faster at a higher altitude with the nose pitched up
@kurotsuki74273 жыл бұрын
Flying is still safer than my driving.
@eddiekhamphoumy948010 ай бұрын
Not really, they just saying that because they want you to travel more and make money of you. Nothing is safer.
@brunobatista40762 жыл бұрын
Unfortunate how they showed the National Air Cargo stall at the same moment the narrator said “for an unprepared pilot, a stall can be catastrophic.” It influences you to think that specific pilot was unprepared. That couldn’t be farther from the truth. Because of ground staff mistakes and improperly secured cargo, those poor souls didn’t have the slightest chance to fight for their lives: they were low, slow and battling a huge change of moment and CG in their aircraft, at their most vulnerable moment. May they rest in peace.
@unknownfromkashmir4 жыл бұрын
Damn, Indonesia has the like the most crashes in the 21st century.
@hi-wt7lg4 жыл бұрын
what u need is real time stall and corckscrew dive management, system should adapt thrust and reverse thrust along with wings to see if it can manage and control any kind of dive
@NicklePickle4264 жыл бұрын
Ok here's why Air Asia 8501 crashed: The idiot pilot got tired of a Master Caution warning going off. So he decided to do what he had seen the ground crew do to shut off the warning system, and that was to reset the circuit breakers. FYI- you can't do that mid-flight, only on the ground. It therefore cut off the autopilot and reset all of the systems. The pilots got confused and didn't know what was going on, and than it crashed.
@Journeyline321go2 жыл бұрын
By this investigation I decided roadways, railways and waterways are better than airways
@SauI_Goodman Жыл бұрын
Not true at all.
@sre331l4 жыл бұрын
All Pilots should learn to fly gliders first! You learn to trust your judgement, and use the instruments, not the other way around. You get one chance in a Glide, no go arounds.
@kenoliver89134 жыл бұрын
But in the dark or in clouds instruments are FAR more reliable than your judgement - that's why pilots are trained to depend on them in IFR. Gliders don't fly in IFR.
@blancaroca87864 жыл бұрын
@@kenoliver8913 IFR FAR KLM WTF ABC CNN .... IFR = in effing reality? In infra red ? in fog rain? Am I getting warm? AIGW?
@kenoliver89134 жыл бұрын
@@blancaroca8786 "Instrument Flight Rules"=fog or cloud. As against VFR="Visual Flight Rules". Any pilot will know what thjey mean.
@sre331l3 жыл бұрын
@@kenoliver8913 I'm not sure you got my meaning! If analogue gauges are spinning, they immediately alert you to the problem, seeing the numbers going up or down the LCD display is not as intuitive. I look at analogue gauges and trust them, peto tubes and computer interpretations are often at odds!
@shivsnayak11013 жыл бұрын
Perfectly described 🔎
@yassir82553 жыл бұрын
3:52 "it's literally that easy", well how about you try flying that plane ms.
@depressedupsetcrying28782 жыл бұрын
Every pilot is a real hero may Allah save all the pilots and may Allah safe all passengers amin
@johnames64304 жыл бұрын
26:20 it literally said that? 😂
@TimeMappedExplorations4 жыл бұрын
LOL
@perarheim12554 жыл бұрын
Emergency or not, It would still be rude to sign off without a word. And it didn't take much extra engineering to implement the feature. They just reused old bits from the "don't sink, I'm confused" and "one thousand - I quit" alerts.
@Arya-ov3ke4 жыл бұрын
@@perarheim1255 hahaah
@johnames64303 жыл бұрын
@@perarheim1255 she doesn't know what the word "literally" means
@hi-wt7lg4 жыл бұрын
howcud u rely on wreckage pattern near storm?
@daniellesymons15694 жыл бұрын
The satellite gps they said it was due for launch in 2018? It’s 2020. Anyone know if it’s in service now?
@koini114 жыл бұрын
Tracking in real time is now a reality. There are various systems available but afaik they all use various sources of information to track and alert if a flight deviates significantly from a flight plan. In fact it is now an ICAO required responsibility of an airline to do this. See GADSS.
@kj.0114 жыл бұрын
Same Question.
@I_SuperHiro_I2 жыл бұрын
Remember, when you get a wing stall, let the wing dip, turn into it, dive to gain speed, level out, live.
@penyarol833 жыл бұрын
“The shocking truth is, an Air Asia-type event could happen anywhere in the world today”
@ElishaBanda-rg3cd Жыл бұрын
An experienced pilot would never stall a plane.
@andysfaleshi28842 жыл бұрын
my mom almost got into the flight if it wasnt for her annoying boss not giving her a vacation TL;DR : your boss is not always bad
@peterolsen2692 жыл бұрын
" A lot of airplanes today are like computer games"... boy isn't that a mouthful. The point is that no one expects to hand fly an aircraft anymore.