They FINALLY Fixed 'Star Wars Jedi: Survivor'...

👾 My Discord Server: / discord
🔴 Live Channel: / @lukestephenslive
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor is a 2023 action-adventure game developed by Respawn Entertainment and published by Electronic Arts. It is the sequel to Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order (2019), taking place five years after the previous game and continues the adventure of young Jedi Knight, Cal Kestis, as he and his friends continue in their struggle to survive the tyranny of the Galactic Empire. The game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on April 28, 2023, and versions for PlayStation 4 and Xbox One are in development. The game received generally favorable reviews from critics.
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor retains many of the gameplay mechanics from its predecessor and introduces new elements. In lightsaber combat, Cal Kestis has access to five different stances, each with unique features. He can use the single blade and double blade stances from the previous game, Fallen Order, and the special dual-wield blade attack is expanded into its own stance. The dual-wield stance was originally intended to be a playable stance in Fallen Order, but it was only included as a special attack due to time constraints. A new stance has also been added that uses a Kylo Ren-style crossguard lightsaber, which requires players to pay attention to timing windows to use effectively, particularly when blocking and parrying enemy attacks. The second new stance is the blaster stance which allows the player to use a lightsaber and blaster combo allowing for both close and ranged attacks. These different stances are designed to be used to combat specific types of enemies which Asmussen says will make the player "figure out what the best weapon of choice is". A new Force stasis ability, similar to the one used by Kylo Ren in The Force Awakens, allows the player to freeze enemies and blaster bolts in mid-air. Player cosmetic customization options have been greatly expanded in Survivor over the limited options available in Fallen Order. Survivor allows the player to customize Cal's entire outfit, along with his hairstyle and facial hair. A white blade is a new color option in lightsaber customization.
The level design of Jedi: Survivor features larger, more expansive maps populated with more non-player characters compared to Fallen Order. Lead level designer Martin Badowsky said that Respawn wanted Koboh to feature a dense central area with more open outskirts areas as the player explores outwards. In addition, the Mantis landing pads have been moved to more central locations on planets to provide easier access to the various regions. The planet Koboh has been described as a "home away from home" that the player will revisit throughout the game, and with each revisit, new pathways will open up. Design director Jeff Magers said that "By exploring the worlds, players will both make Cal more their own through customization" and many of the optional areas contain skills, upgrades and perks that will make Cal "more powerful and equipped to take on the challenges ahead". By comparison, revisiting planets like Bogano in Fallen Order was done primarily in service of progressing the plot rather than for encouraging exploration. Exploration is made easier in Survivor with the addition of fast travel at meditation points where the player can be quickly transported to another meditation point on the planet that they have already discovered. However, Respawn wanted to ensure that using fast travel was not necessary to ordinarily traverse the environment or to complete the story. Fast travel was absent in Fallen Order and was a much-requested feature. Scattered throughout Koboh are seven High Republic-era Jedi Chambers for the player to discover. Jedi Meditation Chambers feature puzzles and challenges for the player to complete and provide rewards such as perks or skill points for the player to upgrade their abilities. Jedi Chambers become available once the player has rescued Zee from the Chamber of Duality.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#gaming #starwars #ps5

[@LukeStephensTV]

Join me on stream or you're a sith sympathizer: 🔴 Live Channel: youtube.com/@lukestephenslive

[@artursobkow2680]

About the FG - I might be wrong but maybe you need Fullscreen not Window Mode

[@slipstream7324]

thanks Luke. i was waiting for either; ray tracing disabled in performance mode or the ps4 version to play on ps5.

[@Shubham-hk6yf]

"fsr is way way worse than DLSS" Nope it's not as good as DLSS but it isn't that bad. Maybe you are talking about this game because you didn't said "in this game" idk

[@feetyeet8538]

Jesus is the only way to heaven Being a good person won’t get you there. “Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” ‭‭John‬ ‭14‬:‭6‬ ‭ESV Repent from your sin(disobedience to God) and turn to God and follow Him so that you will be saved “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” ‭‭1 John‬ ‭1‬:‭9‬ ‭ESV‬‬ “No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.” ‭‭Luke‬ ‭13‬:‭3‬ ‭ESV;

[@slipstream7324]

@@feetyeet8538 I'm with you man but i think Luke is an occultist. Or at the very least has freemasonry or a daughter of the eastern star in his family line.

[@tonydeluna8095]

I actually liked Jedi Survivor. I thought it was a huge improvement over its predecessor

[@94tegLSatMSC]

I'm pretty sure everyone agrees, it was just rough as hell when it launched

[@sandro-of9fq]

No one said it's bad. It was just one of the most broken games ever.

[@raven12333]

@@94tegLSatMSC Depends, gameplaywise it's true it is better especially now that it's stable, but for me personally story is a big letdown, characters are idiots, the high republic is terrible on it's own and doesn't help this game as a background. Maybe there is a bit too much collectibles this time around. Those are my personal gripes with the game. I replayed it after the patch and it's stable on ps5 but texture and model loading is still bad. You enter a bar and it takes a bit of time for geometry and textures to go into high details from low poly mode.

[@94tegLSatMSC]

@@raven12333 I really enjoyed the story personally, and I think the majority did as well 🤷

[@raven12333]

@@94tegLSatMSC Like i said it's a personal preference but you can't say Last boss's decision make any logical sense it was just dumb like really dumb.

[@The_GlitchWitch]

I really, really enjoyed Survivor. I felt like it was a perfect sequel, expanding on both the story and gameplay presented in the first game. It’s such a shame that the launch was so terribly botched because I feel like it could have been considered for GOTY. Granted, objectively speaking, I don’t think it would win over TOTK or BG3 even if it ran perfectly, but it would have at least deserved to be a contender. At this point any fixes are coming too late for it to be a part of that discussion. All the same, I’m looking forward to playing NG+ with the improvements.

[@PaddyLonglegs]

Totally agree

[@majormattjohnson]

Completely agree it's my personal game of the year. Now that starfield is out I can confidently say that.

[@EfecanYSL]

they lost me with that vader fight scene. this trend of vader getting slapped by just about any jedi in the new disney canon is bullshit. disrespect to the character is insane. after how well he was done in the first game, his scene in the sequel was downright horrendous. they could pull off the biggest achievement in mankind's history and i still wouldnt vote survivor for GOTY after that. it just ruins the star wars immersion for me. Vader is the 2nd strongest sith in history according to their own lore.. anyone who beats him means they are emperor-level which is insane. legends vader is weaker than canon vader and he was eating jedi masters of cere's level with a sneeze. vader just after a few years in the suit beat a jedi council master and somehow a jedi who's been off-grid with the force for a decade suddenly equals him ? yeah nah.

[@alexanerose4820]

@@EfecanYSL To be fair, Vader clapped her hard in the first game so she had to get some revenge in this one. In the end though, Vader was both stronger and smarter which got her killed as it should be

[@plustico2846]

What's TOTK?

[@Willpowaa]

I loved Jedi Survivor. Even with the technical issues, it was one of my favorite games I’ve played in a long time. My personal game of the year

[@returnofthedjed11]

What do you love so much about it?

[@komix1873]

​@@returnofthedjed11same 4 me tbh...combat, exploring, jump and run Puzzles, cutscenes are good...really like that

[@SPACE-98]

Same

[@robnavarro9405]

Same, I think people over exaggerated the issues. It was definitely playable. There’s no doubt that it had issues; but people were saying it’s not playable comfortably at launch. Definitely my personal game of the year. Koboh was the biggest dip IMO

[@superjose2108]

Same

[@BennyLlama]

Yes they did. It obly took 4 months. I was able to play for 3 straight hours at good, stable, framerates. It will still be my last EA game as I don't pay full price to be a beta tester

[@AsharadDracul]

What's your special and could you tell me how much of bonus frame did you get??

[@BennyLlama]

@asharad6059 I assume you mean specs lol. I'm running a Ryzen 7 5800x3d, RTX 4070ti, 64GB DDR4 ram at 2k with raytracing enabled and I'm getting 60ish fps without DLSS and around 100 with DLSS on quality

[@BennyLlama]

@when_did_handles_come_back It would probably run fine on medium w/out raytracing. I have access to a 3060 powered laptop PC as well. I'll install and test it tonight and let you know how it runs. I'm a bit curious now myself

[@strawhatpandashp5816]

@@BennyLlamayup lmk I got a 3060 and was looking to get this after Starfield

[@Deadpool-ts3tq]

​@@Entropic_Meat_MachineIt does run I played it at launch on RTX 3060 laptop, depending on location and planet, I was getting 30-50 FPS with FSR activated Tbh I dont fully remember the rest of settings I played with, but I believe it was medium with some settings on high and 1200p

[@ewjiml]

Luke I hate to break it to you but Digital Foundry completely disapproves your theory on how great the performance is for Survivor. The frames might be higher but the frame stuttering and shader compilation issues have not been fixed. At all.

[@VelcroSnake93]

Yeah, seems like it's still not great, especially since Luke seems to base it being fixed on needing to use upscalers. If the game was fixed you should be able to run it decently without needing to rely on upscalers. That said, Luke doesn't seem to be the most knowledgeable in terms of the tech in games (at least based on some comments in this video), and for him if it looks better than it was it must be better. I mean, he's running a 4090 and only getting in the 60's with upscaling turned off, that ain't good Luke.

[@RrylOfficial]

yes i agree, this guy is rocking a 4090 and calling it fixed, im using 4080 super and im not happy with the optimization of it.

[@trystanschell1947]

@@RrylOfficial I have a 2060 and didnt even have issues on launch. I didnt even know people were complaining about it until now

[@Wonderbrut]

@@trystanschell1947oh come on bruh you look up any piece of media on this game a year ago when it dropped and that’s all anyone was talking about

[@jeremy9474]

This series really needs a high budget TV show or movie. The story is 10x better than anything Disney has ever done

[@voratittchunharuckchot9711]

Agreed, the story give me Star Wars vibes unlike many series from Disney And apart from being a good actor, I think Cameron Monaghan also has some skill with the lightsaber (that is one reason he pass the audition for Cal) Maybe not to the level of prequel actors like Hayden and other, but his skill should be better than what we got in the recent Disney Star Wars

[@drakethesnek6429]

If that were to happen, Disney would be the ones to make and ruin it.

[@RecluseBootsy]

I felt like Kal was the perfect person to introduce to Grogu at the end of Mando S1. They ride Luke and Vader's dick way too hard to sell a side series or post credit scene, the hype/surprise would cut way deeper if they threw out Starkiller or Kal out there to tease a live series/adaption.

[@CrooKdLetterJ]

Liked the first game but it kinda has no replay value dont know if the swcond is diffrent but for a one and done game you might hit up again once in awhile i cant spend 80 bucks on it

[@jeremy9474]

@@CrooKdLetterJ Survivor is a lot better than Fallen Order IMO and I got the platinum trophy in the game so there isn’t much else for me to do but replay it again when I feel it’s been long enough. Yeah, replayability is an issue with most story based games but the story is very good. I’d pick it up if you see it on sale

[@roulettxxl9941]

It's embarrasing that it took 4 months to fix the performance issues. Fixing bugs, overall polish of course can take even more than that, understandably so. But the fact that the performance only got to a playable level after so long is unacceptable

[@teamtx1578]

For some reason, ever since the update, I've been getting broken character animations and audio bugs. I don't know if it's just me but the game seems even more broken than before.

[@komix1873]

​@@teamtx1578true same 4 me🫤

[@JP-bd5kq]

i saw this happening and waited for it to get on sale… been doing it for all “new” releases. nothing is being released finished other than like zelda and spiderman bc the years they put into it actually seem to go into development

[@NVRDYING]

@@Imran51408sfr could’ve just dropped now

[@RecluseBootsy]

At least they fixed it, look at Raven/InfinityWard/Treyarch and MW2. It's almost been a year and your game kicks you in the pre-game lobby, you load in without the weapons you just picked, there's visual tearing, frame rate drops, clipping issues, latency discrepencies, bots literally spawn 6ft off the ground on top of you, they blatantly use fog and dark areas to hide the bugs instead of fixing them, and the costumes you pay $25 for don't even load in half the time and other folks see the default skin. 😂

[@itsjusteddie7384]

I recently got the game for my birthday on PS5 and have been playing though it. I’ve had very minimal issues. There’s a crashing issue with the large elevators that go a large distance. Some pop-in and texture issues when moving between areas too quickly. But that’s it. Been having a blast. Edit: game had an update, elevator crashing is fixed!

[@legoforbeginners6950]

Same. I had one crash while traveling in hyperspace and some texture issues. Other than that, not much and I got it two weeks after launch. -xbox player Actually bounties were broken for like two months. I could talk to caj but not get them.

[@Jok3rSmilee]

How's the fps and resolution on ps5?

[@Left4Coragem]

I like these videos because now I can add the game to my wishlist and wait for a sale. Remember people, if you keep buying broken games at launch, the publisher has no reason to go back and fix it. This is the exception.

[@bosneb]

I bought Jedi Stuttervivor at launch because I wanted to reward EA for continuing to support SP games, and Fallen Order was good so they had my good will. Boy was that a mistake. Took em long enough to fix it, was beginning to think they never would.

[@timotheus34]

Patient gamers really have it so much better.

[@qlasalle]

It's not an exception because there is no common pattern. Most games have patches after launch actually.

[@TRONiX404]

Just got it on G2A for 44% off :)

[@urgandma]

@@bosneb I refunded after dropping everything to low and still having a choppy frame rate, now I wait until $20 or less.

[@marinebymistake]

on pc they didn't it's still stuttering everywhere no matter your rig

[@viniciuseduardobomfim]

Pretty sure Digital Foundry posted a very in-depth, updated analysis and they still rank Jedi Survivor as the worst PC Port of 2023. From the perspective of both a top of the line PC to one that's entry level.

[@r3dp9]

The last time I read The Prince by Machievelli, my impression is that it was the sort of book that an attentive person would see as good, but could be easily twisted into something evil. That was kinda the whole point of the book: how easy it is to confuse evil for practical and practical for evil. Evil and practical can LOOK similar, but they are not the same, as one has foresight and the other is self destructive in the long run.

[@austinmc12]

What the hell are you talking about 😭

[@FreakazoidRobots]

I'd say that it was practical advice that didn't even discuss morality. Like any tool, it could be used for good or evil.

[@knightmare1267]

​@FreakazoidRobots I'd venture to say that it was particularly prone to misinterpretation because it didn't discuss morality. And the ultra practical, realist advice it presented is too often connotated with evil or atleast coldness in our modern society.

[@andrewp8284]

@@austinmc12he references Machiavelli/The Prince in the video.

[@Ssquire11]

Its better but FAR from fixed. The stuttering is still bad and that is unacceptable. Its like trying to watch a movie with a scratched disk. I don't know if this game will EVER be fixed.

[@williammoore1030]

Just finished it recently and I think it is pretty good. The traversal and exploration was improved from the first for sure.

[@pcgamingftw5694]

It isn't fixed, there are many videos out there showing huge traversal stutter, even on high-end machines. It just depends on the area you are in. Also, you can't say "it's fixed" just because it runs barely okay on a 4k dollar machine. 99.9% of people are not running specs even close to this...

[@bosneb]

Hmm really? I was testing in the area that makes my machine stutter the most (the town on Koboh) and it seemed actually quite polished finally (with ray tracing off). I assumed traversal stutter was what was causing that area to run so poorly, so I thought it might be fixed. I wouldn't be surprised to see traversal stutter linger tho, they never fixed that in Fallen Order.

[@melcorchancla9431]

Yeah it still stutters

[@noturmum7967]

Runs great for me!

[@aaxel_dz]

Yeah he shouldn’t speak when it comes to pc gaming. It looks like he knows nothing

[@Ashbrash1998]

It might depend on other variables for some people.

[@sonnyankau9239]

this dude must've got a crazy check to make this joke of a video because this game is still an absolute disaster on pc

[@i-king89]

TRUE

[@elomellow1623]

It has really gotten pathetic how they keep releasing broken products, and we consumers end up praising them for fixing them after some of us have spent money. We really get treated like trash as gamers.

[@FlamespeedyAMV]

And people pay even MORE money than before

[@_You_Are_Not_Him_]

But daddy respawn made it better 🥺

[@steveo0127]

I feel you I got burnt by EA it will be the last time I a game from them

[@Stardestroy]

How about not buying it until people praise it?

[@elomellow1623]

@@Stardestroy Why is it OK for it to come out broken in the first place?

[@spyder5876]

I'm playing it for the first time, oh MAN is it not fixed.

[@daarkrid3r]

Yeah, they fixed it good. Still having annoying stuterring on Koboh, still having frame pacing issues. And i'm not the only one, steam forums are full of people complaining.

[@ompatel5570]

If the game launched now instead of before, it could've been a game of the year contender

[@jonmichaelbarnett2051]

I started playing survivor around the time it was a little more stable on ps5, so this is really good to hear. Might have to jump back into it eventually.

[@artofchang]

Nah. I don't think we should give devs (or should I say the publishers) slack for not getting your game to 60fps. We've had 2 gens with sub 60fps. That's almost 20 years now. 60fps should be the standard. PS5 and Xbox Series are more than capable of getting games at at least 1080p 60fps. We should be expecting that from all devs by now. Again, I really don't blame the devs. They're just doing the best they can. In a perfect world, all devs would be given the time to get their games running at a minimum 60fps and 4k. It's on the publishers and higher ups cuz all they care about is meeting or surpassing their quarterly earnings.

[@andrewhadjimichael9616]

No the game is not 'fixed'. It still judders and I have experienced 2 crashes so far. A little unreal engine 4 crash diagnostics box pops up after every crash. Only twice so far and I'm probably over half way through. But the jank and judder is still present. 5800x3d, rtx 4080, 32GB ram.

[@bulldawgslays3724]

Game was absolutely amazing. A 9/10 for me even before fixes.

[@dmen0563]

You're the reason these companies are ok releasing unfinished garbage

[@crabulonsix9162]

ah, now we know who to thank when the next Star Wars Jedi game launches with 20 fps on every console and gpu/cpu set imaginable. Again.

[@thatredhead3613]

Don't listen to these guys. I'm glad you enjoyed it. I love the game too

[@1twin]

Listen to these guys

[@adrian09166]

I'm still going to wait for a year worth of patches and fixes so I can play the best version of this game that I can but this is a great improvement!

[@cookdislander4372]

Same

[@teeman7137]

Pretty sure it will be on gamepass someday

[@ronthorn3]

Games running flawless right now, so you’re waiting for nothing.

[@jakealcock5905]

I bought and played this game for around 100 hours at launch for the series x and didn’t come into 1 bug the ENTIRE play through and that’s not an exaggeration.

[@shagger69]

Ahh yes, the DLSS = Optimization patch

[@tenorenstrom]

I played it this summer. It was working flawlessly then. Played it on my laptop. The worst of the launch problems must've been fixed then already.

[@Ajax_97]

Still get this ON SALE. Make them lose money when they do this. Money thing is the ONLY thing that speaks to businesses.

[@doc.schiwago2949]

On PC: No, they did NOT fix it on Console: Just removed RT to get a "performance mode" Also: Do NOT use a 4090 to check game performance(s) after a patch

[@viniciuseduardobomfim]

Digital Foundry also checked with a 4090 and their verdict is that Jedi Survivor remains 2023's worst PC port.

[@nexus1698]

It's getting 60fps, but it's still got some noticeable screen tearing on the ps5 in koboh I don't know about the other planet's, it still needs some more work but it's an awesome improvement

[@carston101]

"They saw what it was like before we fixed it..." Correction: "they saw what it was like before *it was finished.*"

[@liqslip]

Console games launching at 60 fps is really only novel recently. Tons of NES, SNES, Dreamcast, etc. games launched at 60. In my view this reversion to 30 fps was caused by marketing's increasing influence, ie prettier graphics are easier to sell than smoother framerates.

[@ShinjiIkari007]

Now I will buy it at discount 😂 People who preorder & play day one at full price are clowns

[@robemanchester2277]

I wouldnt say FSR "isn't even close" to DLSS, until you get to lower tiers. Call me an AMD fan boy all day but at least the game shipped with upscaling support for all GPUs over just Nvidia GPUs, even if the proprietary method is better. XeSS is probably the future of all 3 though, would have liked to have seen that supported

[@meowmeow2759]

I love XESS over fsr, I noticed better quality than what AMD is capable of

[@valentinvas6454]

We will have to see what FSR 3.0 is capable of. If they manage to refine it FSR could become the future. What pissed me off is that the game switched to 50% resolution scale if you turned off FSR so I had to change my resolution to 200% of my monitor to play the game at native 1440p. Yes I had to manually change my internal resolution to 5K LOL. Despite all of this Jedi Survivor is easily in my top 5 games this year, so far even top 3, but Alan Wake 2, Lies of P or Lords of the Fallen my push it lower.

[@zero2006xl]

Man, this is not fixed. You need the highest end CPUs to play this game without stuttering. Not mid range. Not mid high. The best CPUs.

[@coreyyoung6052]

had they just waited 4 months to release the game to begin with, we wouldnt even be talking about this. just postpone the fucking game

[@robertbeisert3315]

This is why I wait months or even years for new releases, as a rule. Not only do you get to catch them on discount, but someone's patched it to be runnable.

[@eurongreyjoy2]

This game is not fixed on PS5. It crashes unlike any other game, even after following all suggested fixes. It's absolutely horrendous and I'm going to have to refund on PS5 for the first time.

[@TheAkdzyn]

Why don't they just wait until it's ready before they launch. It's so frustrating to spend $70 on a broken product. There needs to be a transparent universal organisation that protects consumers from buying janky games by testing them to see if they meet requirements as advertised before they can sell them - especially AAA titles.

[@SoftActor]

I understand where you are coming from, but if they had waited hypothetically based on when they got all the kinks worked out, it possibly would have been released now or last month, which were high-traffic months for release. They are a business first that has to make a product, regardless if they take shortcuts.

[@TheAkdzyn]

@@SoftActor I suppose you've got a point. My opinion was founded on the basis that having a board like this would require them to factor in the time for submission, evaluation and approval. It's incredibly disappointing and disadvantageous to both the consumer and developers to have a game that fails to make it's ROI because it under delivered so spectacularly that it angered it's core fan base to the point of boycotting the title and subsequently closing the studio thatmade it. This practice has also enabled excessive spending on marketing budgets while the studio is understaffed because it is underfunded. If you compare games by quality you'll find that certain studios produce better products than others despite time frame and ambition. Some of the studios are producing incredibly entartaining titles with far less time and resources which means their screening process for the completeness of a product registers better indicators than others. Just thinking out loud here.

[@dubhouse6379]

this game is not yet fixed, i bought it and in open areas it is a stutter fest, frame time is all over the place it goes down to 27, 32, 35 even limiting frame rate, with dlss on and ray tracing off, lowering resolution, lowering visuals ingame, tweaking it on nvidia settings, does not make it better in certain open areas you still get low 30s i have an nvidia 3070 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H so it should run better, not fixed yet on pc don´t buy unless you are ok with stuttering 70 percent of the time.

[@Reykt21]

I wouldn't be surprised if DLSS has only been allowed to be implemented recently, given AMD's sudden "declaration" and change of mind that they were absolutely supporting devs wanting to implement DLSS even in their own sponsored games, when asked for Starfield repeatedly. Because data clearly shows that apart from some Sony exclusive ports (and if anyone has the leverage it would be them), a big majority of the titles sponsored by AMD were locked with FSR only. Even though we've seen with Starfield that a quick and dirty DLSS implementation was super easy to do for modders (got it on early access launch day so...) plus the fact that Unreal has a built-in DLSS plugin that takes a box to check (and Jedi Survivor is an Unreal game). Now this is patch 7 so yes it took them a while, maybe a small team, but they did a lot of work and outside of DLSS it just runs way smoother overall, the stutters are heavily reduced in quantity and intensity, and that was a big issue. Anyway this is an awesome game, especially if you like Star Wars, so definitely give it a try now if you can :)

[@cookie_of_nine]

DLSS3 only works in the Unreal plugin for unreal 5.2+, so respawn had to manually modify the engine to include it. Also, the DLSS plugin openly admits to breaking some effects, like depth of field, so the devs / porting team would have to recreate every effect that broke so that the game didn't look like trash when running with DLSS, and test the entire game to make sure they didn't miss anything. The people claiming that DLSS is a "checkbox" for Unreal don't know what they are talking about, sure it might be easy to enable, but there's hundreds of hours of testing, tweaks, and fixes that need to be made. DLSS 3 requires even more work as it requires updating the game logic to hook in Reflex, as that's needed to keep the latency added by DLSS3 to a managable level.

[@raven80wolfx2]

This is fake news. Nvidia has been caught pushing fake narrative to make them look good. Look it up that amd isn't locking fsr only to helping them with the game. Example starfield no driver pushed on nvidia and they push out anti amd narrative when they didn't put money into drivers for the game. They are too focus on ai with driver development.

[@Reykt21]

@@cookie_of_nine Really appreciate the insight, thank you. I still believe this could have been done earlier if they were authorized to, especially if you just tackle the Frame Gen / DLSS 3 part later down the road, because man the FSR 2 integration was not good let’s be real.

[@atavusable]

@@Reykt21 Your point of view is AMD is blocking Dev from adding DLSS. I don't know if this is ture or not. But from what I heard Nvidia doesn't give an a** about driver and potentially dev help now. So in my head canon I would think Nvidia is purposefully not giving help to studio that enter deals with AMD.

[@grady3251]

I've been awakened to the glory of 60+ fps but from my experience, it only takes about 10-15 minutes to get acclimated back to 30 fps even with first person and shooters. I still prefer performance modes on consoles, but I'm not going to avoid a game simply because it runs at 30.

[@awesome3139]

I wasn’t sold on 60 fps as a requirement until about a year ago, but it is now more important to me in a modern game than detailed graphics.

[@enzocrespin5806]

@@awesome3139 Same. I recently tried to play Bloodborne on PS plus, one of the few PS4 games that were never patched to run at 60fps. I turned it off after a minute, I couldn't bear the choppyness

[@Faceplay2]

I honestly ran into no issues playing Jedi survivor besides a few small glitches. And I got the game right when it came out.

[@cxngo8124]

Btw the performance mode on console is FSR 2. DLSS is nvidia exclusive and the consoles use an AMD gpu and cpu

[@darthrizzen9349]

Replying from the future (Jan 2024): PC version crashed within 40 minutes after a series of stutters and worrying instances of mean slowdown. Game finally died during a cutscene. PS5: don't go anywhere near a waterfall. Beyond that it kinda works. Yep... Needs more time in the oven. 🤣

[@typickoopakid]

I'm really glad this didn't end up like the Dead Space remake where they just stopped updating the game even though it still to this day has some pretty bad technical issues on PC.

[@Muhammad-Jacobs699]

Because the 'next gen' consoles were all advertised as 60-120 FPS consoles, bringing about a new era to gaming. That's what most people find a problem with.

[@T.O.Wallee]

After I found out about the news of latest patch, I went out immediately purchased the hard copy of the game. Enjoying it on PS5 now. There's some graphic glitches on water but is okay. Game is running 60fps locked. Day and night experience. I'm glad that I hold back during launch. The game is finally finished. Appreciate the developer puts time to fix this. Hopefully the next fix gonna be FF16

[@BVargas78]

Same with me, and FF16 does need some work. The level of details look good but performance mode frames are barely better than Quality modes at times. But i'm glad survivor is fixed. In fact, had it launched this way we'd be seeing a game of the year contended but because of the bad launch it's probably scuppered its chances of that.

[@mubarak6796]

FF16 is good the frame rate drops to 40 sometimes but its not that bad

[@BVargas78]

@@mubarak6796 The FF16 combat can be pretty smooth. But i hope performance frames in open areas can be improved a bit.

[@T.O.Wallee]

@@mubarak6796 maybe not sensitive for you but it is to me. I enjoy locked 60fps without dips

[@mubarak6796]

@@T.O.Wallee I understand if your pc gamer and used to high refresh rate and just got console, but if you are not and been playing on consoles your used to 30 fps, and yes I understand that a stady 30 is better then 60 to 40 dips but the game is way better now the last two weeks was me playing FF16 and the dips are mainly in cutscenes when icons fight in the open world fps dips are rare.

[@mauditebalvenie]

Yeah I've grown accustomed to playing games 6 months after launch since it usually takes that long for the devs to patch it up. Hell it took ubisoft over a year to patch a bug in wildlands that kept some missions from showing up.

[@kacperS07]

When i played through it on Xbox Series X I had no issues playing on performance mode. I guess I was lucky

[@Antagonist115]

I Don’t think people realize how crazy it is that they did this 4.5 months later, it’s not a live service game, they Literaly could have abandoned the performance because it sold like hotcakes, but no, they worked hard to improve it, hats off to them, and no I’m not excusing the shit performance at launch, i didn’t play the game until now because of the performance but hats off to them for fixing it

[@captainsnugleup]

Only things that suck about having the 6700xt is the upscaling software and I can't play uncharted 4 without a specific driver update

[@thatguyrightbehindyo]

This gives me a cyberpunk 2077 vibe. I’ve waited till all issues are fixed and I’m ready to jump into Jedi this winter. Can’t wait for 2077 to do it’s be update so I can jump into that with the dlc. Nothing like being patient

[@duckpwnd]

Cyberpunk 2077 will still never be what was shown in the trailers. From a gameplay perspective, Jedi Survivor delivers what was promised. No matter how smoothly 2077 runs, it's always going to be a stripper down and hollowed out version of what was promised; a lot of its problems are not fixable.

[@MrJesus4132]

@@duckpwndLmao

[@kilgoretrout5086]

Good, this game has been in my wish-list while waiting for them to finally fix these issues.

[@jcsmiley1255]

I guess I got lucky on series x. I played the whole game in performance mode at launch, and didnt have any problems my entire playthrough.

[@TheJoshDixonShow]

Yeah I'm in the same boat. Didn't have any problems. I assume most of the issues were specific to PC optimization I guess? 🤷‍♂

[@Mereo110]

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why I'm a patient gamer.

[@pqfire0950]

I just got back on it and jesus DLSS is great and the game is so much smoother. Loving it

[@jedimindtrick75]

"The better part of half a year" ... When just saying 5 months is not enough 🤣🤣 Good video dude.

[@DdHenley307]

I really liked this game on ps5 but a glitch wouldn't let me use my scanner at one area so I couldnt finish the mission. After a dozen tries I moved on

[@jonq8714]

Fixed? I still has horrible frame drops, transition stutters and i had to stop playing altogether because 10 'unhandled access violations' crashed my game on the final boss. It's less broken, but it's still broken.

[@Crashed131963]

Patches fixed many games in the past . like Cyberpunk 2070, FF14, Mass Effect Andromeda ,No Man's Sky. All Jedi Survivor needed was Ray Tracing removed in Performance mode . Something nobody would notice anyways .

[@blazingcbolt9522]

Such a shame that I still can't get passed Bode's Quarters because they still won't fix their game breaking bugs.. Two play throughs and I literally cannot play the game, because I'm physically stuck in a room I can't get out of.

[@DarthQueefious]

I wonder whether we'll also see a 4 month wait for DLSS in Starfield [conspiratorial face emoji]

[@JLeeCN]

Did you ever figure out why FG didnt work? Kind of important detail...

[@Zecuto]

I love not buying games on launch, saves both money and nerves. Thank you gaming industry for this valuable teaching moment.

[@TheJokerCell]

10:24 Are you kidding me right now?!? Are we going to pat EA and Respawn in the back for doing the bare minimum and fixing their game 4 months after launch? We must stop giving giant companies praise for doing what should have never happened in the first place. EA is not some poor little studio that would close if sales weren't good and it definitely should not pretend their products are as well. So no, fixing the game 4 months after launch is not something to be praised, in the contrary we should shame them for taking so long

[@drakejohnson5386]

I play on PS5 and after the patch, the desert horses legs would bug out. It was all visual, but still very jarring

[@Flufferpup]

This shouldn't be celebrated. The game should have actually worked from day one. It's 2023, a playable and smooth 60fps is the bare minimum.

[@CountDracul13]

Been waiting so long to play this game on pc with 13900k and 4080. I would constantly be checking reviews. This is very awesome to see. Thank you EA, & Respawn. Bout time .

[@Overonator]

You can still see the sudden jarring level of detail changes and the shadows pop in.

[@maharaja101]

Patient gamers win again. I'll pick it up the next time I'll see it on sale

[@andreeamociran2360]

And story- related: you wait to get to the last planet the whole game… and then nothing happends. Or was it just me?

[@evanalvarez27]

I really wish the game shipped in this state, but at least I can do ng+ smoothly.

[@scovafd]

"being able to play at 60 is a novel concept" the fact that that's true for consoles in 2023 is pathetic and sad. It should have been made the standard years ago.

[@c.wubby.u861]

I am a 40-45 fps believer for consoles games, i wish that could be the standard because its a sweet spot for smooth enough framerate and its not too demanding,

[@dantealighieri4543]

The moral of the story with this is to never buy game on launch and wait for reviews to make sure the game is up to high standards not just in its content but also performance wise. Dead Space Remake still has traversal stuttering to this day and the last patch was in February.....

[@coatguy2990]

Uh huh. That explains why I refunded the game yesterday after trying to get it to recognize any of my 3 controllers for 90 minutes and the game didn’t. Shit port. Don’t buy on steam.

[@ralphengland8559]

30 fps is no longer acceptable. The notion that 60 fps is novel in gaming history is ridiculous. Running water is novel in human history. Would you accept buying a house that didn't have running water?

[@westywest4480]

My 1660 S be like "what chu talken bout Willis?"

[@amirsadeghzadeh1952]

The game is still broken what are you saying it's fixed 😂😂

[@F0n53ca]

The worst part for me is that people who payed full price had a worst version than the ones that will buy the game from now on for less, or for free with eaplay

[@jordick8427]

If only they didn't launch it like they did. 1st impressions mean everything to me, because it shows how much the company cares about their consumers. And with the messy launch EA and Respawn's higher ups showed that they don't care whether the game works or not, as long they can get our money. And it's because of that why I refuse to purchase the game at full price, because when the company doesn't care about their consumers then why should we purchase their products at full price (or at all).

[@anti_life_eq]

Imagine lying and calling this game fixed.

[@_Mattz1nho]

This guys locked his frame rate to 60fps to try and hide the stutters, that are still there.

[@phillipssteven45]

I honestly think the devs want this to get GOTY. With all the amazing games that have come out this year I hope it does, unlikely it’ll take a miracle, but fingers crossed.

[@simonrockstream]

its not fixed. it's a little better. nowhere near 'decent' still.

[@FlamespeedyAMV]

No modern AAA game can be fixed

[@_Mattz1nho]

@@FlamespeedyAMV I mean, you look at games like Resident Evil 4 and the way it released with really good performance on every platform. It doesn't need fixing so your logic is strange, There's plenty of games that have released over the years on PC that have really good performance and do not need follow up patches to fix their issues. That's the point. Also, this game still runs terrible.

[@CaptainRaylin]

I always ask myself: If they put in the work and houndreds of hours of ppl to make this game actually good anyway, why not do that before launch? They spent their recources for it one way or another. This way they just made people mad at launch. I'm assuming everyone would have gladly waited 6 more months for it to be like this at launch... But maybe that's just me and i'm missing something.

[@Chillantro]

They got paid earlier and I bet it was a situation where they go if no one buys it we don’t have to, but people bought it so they now have funds and an obligation.

[@teeman7137]

The main lead of these corporation is the marketing section

[@ethanwagner]

“I don’t wanna give them the Brett Farve clap” made me actually giggle out loud at work, never thought we would get sports crossovers on this channel but I’m all for it tbh!

[@QuietKnightt]

Thank you for making this Luke! I can’t wait to play this now!!

[@TheWhaleTerm]

Bloodborne is the GOAT game and it’s stuck at 30 frames lol

[@___David__]

I've been waiting for them to fix it. Good to know they did it. But by now... I think I can wait a few more months and let the game drop down to 30€. It's already at 60€ down from 80€ anyway.

[@killerapp7612]

Dead Space and Jedi 1 & 2 are some of the best intellectual properties EA owns and they are STILL broken. Management should have tools for stuttering, screen-tearing, and frame drops. Someone at the top of that company needs to be fired because they are one of the biggest publishers in the business and they can't fix these issues.

[@kenbenz_]

When those games were released at 30 fps that was peak for its time we’re in 2024 60 on next gen is bare minimum standard

[@JeremyDadHat]

I was enjoying the game despite its performance issues but became demoralized after my XP kept disappearing after I died. The second or third time I had to stop because it was too frustrating to lose progression due to a glitch.

[@cocoverde]

The best strategy nowadays to play games is simply wait.. wait a couple of months before investing your money on it. The game will be cheaper and with less problems as a whole.

[@AlwaysEwok]

Launched rough? Never had any issue playing it on console. A game being buggy because you can’t run it at 9383747 FPS while downloading all of p*rnhub at the same time is the single worst opinion in all of KZbin gaming and the people who use that as an excuse to make videos calling a solid game trash are the bottom of the barrel scourge of gaming fun

[@Xsetsu]

I am glad they fixed it, but I couldn't disagree more on the 30fps thoughts. While plenty of games have done it in the past that doesn't mean it is some standard past bare minimal. Most of the those older games especially going back to 360/PS3 feel like crap now at 30fps, and the 360/PS3 games that ran at 60fps have aged far better. Many PS2 games were 60fps, so it is not some new idea. SH2 and 3's cutscenes where 60fps on the PS2 and makes them the better version to play still to this day. Go back and play some of those games at 30fps; it doesn't feel good. With DLSS/FSR and VRR now no game should be shooting for 30 fps and as people upgrade their TVs and monitors to have VRR support the floor should be 40fps with VRR these days, since there is a huge value add to the gameplay.

[@ByTexify]

Tbh it kinda depends on how optimized a game is, i would rather play with a good stable 30 than inconsistent 60 with frame drops all over the place. Ofc stable 60 is best but not always possible for all games it seems

[@Xsetsu]

@@ByTexify Sure but 30fps has no tangible benefit where 40fps allows VRR, which does. And truth be told you aren't gaining that much fidelity at 30fps over 40fps. If you can make a stable 30, you can make a stable 40.

[@regionalflyer]

I will post this on every Jedi Survivor video I can find. This game is a scam! My computer specs are well over twice the RECOMMENDED hardware yet I can't run it. Why? It utilizes only 20-ish percent of my CPU and only slightly more of my GPU. It's completely unplayable!

[@NPOCrushader]

I honestly can not tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps most of the time... as long as the game run stable and consistent then I don't really mind. At least for these kinds of games