This $500 Cinema Camera is INSANE!

This 10-year-old Canon C100 Cinema Camera has a 4K super 35mm sensor, XLR Audio inputs, AF, and built in ND filters! Get 10% Off of Cinematch & Film convert using code "NATE10"
Cinematch → www.cinematch....
Film Convert → geni.us/OInD
Canon C100 → geni.us/JlACMV
Canon C100 mark ii → geni.us/QeKNYoe
Shot with this lens → geni.us/js6SB3
🎬 Get 10% Off of Cinematch & Film Convert using code "NATE10"
Film Convert → geni.us/JlbFh
Cinematch → geni.us/mDklAx
🎶 Music & Sound FX from Epidemic Sound → geni.us/esnate...
🎞️ Sign up for FREE to The Dailies newsletter to keep current with the latest filmmaking news! geni.us/jdA5wb
🎥 MY FILM KIT → kit.co/natesfi...
Main Camera → geni.us/NL1X
BUDGET Camera → geni.us/vu1A
Gimbal Camera → geni.us/VUA9
Main Lens → geni.us/C3d74D
Best BUDGET Zoom Lens → geni.us/cadBQ
Best Shotgun Mic → geni.us/7U8Mkc3
Best Wireless Mic → geni.us/r57ou
Rode Handheld Mic → geni.us/VfCRbF3
XLR Adapter for Camera → geni.us/Pfs08NA
XLR Cable → geni.us/J37cg
ND Filter → geni.us/LeBA3Ps
Magic Filter → geni.us/XNCSKc
SD Cards → amzn.to/3vfFLXO
Amazon links are affiliated, purchasing through these links continues to support the channel.
✔️ Subscribe for more film tutorials / @natesfilmtutorials
► SOCIAL
Instagram / nathan_swehla
Email [e-mail]
Hi, my name is Nathan, I’m a filmmaker sharing what I learn in concise videos. Subscribe for my film tutorials, gear reviews, short films and behind the scenes content, every week on KZbin.

[@RickMunday]

The C100 is definitely one the most film-like digital cameras out there. I was stunned the first time I rented one years ago. No film look filters needed in edit. Now you've got me thinking I should buy a couple more.

[@AxelAxe]

They would be great specially for podcasts. Although the color is a bit off in the green tints

[@scottlong7168]

COULD USE ONE AT 600 ,WOW

[@LeeThomaslightingcameraman]

@@AxelAxeI was always battling the green tint in C log. The lack of 10 bit made log a bit useless too. The C200 is probably the best version of this era of camera.

[@AxelAxe]

@@LeeThomaslightingcameraman yes we still use a full set of 6 C200 for the podcast I produce. There is a lot of green in the shadows but we do our best. Now Sony has done a lot better with their FX line so I’m moving to that next year

[@marjankrebelj4007]

Does the mkII have the same "filmic" quality?

[@huntervalleyartsartists9313]

I have 3 C100mkii's, all bought second hand, and use them for artist interviews, coverage of art events, coverage of music events (opera, big band, orchestra, soloists and more)...I love the ease of use, reliability, battery life, XLR inputs with good pre-amps and picture quality...file sizes are low for the quality of image produced which makes it good for longer event shooting

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

100% Agreed!

[@Sutterjack]

I own 2 of them and doubt I'll sell them even when I upgrade to 4K - great for long events and a safety or B cam

[@huemanzu]

where did you buy them?

[@pilsplease7561]

@@Sutterjack yeah

[@snapshotmediagroupuganda9105]

Hi, I'm Francis Onyango from Kampala Uganda. I earn a living through video & photography. How much can you sell to me those cameras.

[@ChrisJS1987]

I remember wanting this so bad when it was new but I couldn't afford it. Many years later I'm considering picking it up just to have a play with it and satisfy the curiosity that is still buzzing in my mind.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

It is fun to shoot with!

[@ritmicdance]

Покупай с200. Она вообще супер!

[@ETMMediaGroup]

Shot my indie feature on this with an Anamorphic Lens. Not an ARRI or Red, but it definitely has a cinema feel to it. The ND filter is a game changer. For those on a budget, get this camera. Hell, if you have to shoot on your phone, get it done. Hollywood is not coming and knocking on your door. Thanks for the review.

[@IndieVisualUK]

Where can I watch your feature film? Would love to see it! Especially to see how the camera with the anamorphic lens looks. I'm trying to decide whether to get this camera!

[@AllthatSam]

Still stporting a C100 MK I as my B camera. It's amazing how well it holds up next to me C70, especially when there's enough light... One thing you did not mention is the amazing built-in microphones in the top handle. The built in stereo condensor mics are some of the best anyone has ever put inside of a camera...

[@FloatingOnAZephyr]

It's a wonderful camera. The mark 2 has the *much* better EVF (which is amazing in bright sun), the AF as standard (it was an add-on for the C100), and the screen is a full flip-out. It's also hardly any more expensive. On that screen, it's OLED. If it had 10-bit 4K, I'd never replace it. I love this thing. Next to the very latest 4K 10bit cameras coming out, its image holds up but is definitely outshined. Personally, I think 4K is a massively over-hyped advent, but when you combine its resolution with 10-bit, you get such smooth gradients that it really does take the image up a level.

[@langdons2848]

Pretty much why I went for the C200. 4K and RAW recording. I love the images I get from that camera, especially the skin tones. That's not to take away anything from the C100 though. It's a great camera.

[@midnightsnack1306]

I own one. Used it for long form events. Love the image it produces. The preamps of the C100 is also really good.

[@305kubrick]

Throughout my years of professional work, the C100mk II ranks in my top 2 favorite digital cameras of all time. Still a solid choice in 2023 for 1080p capture and delivery.

[@lb7144]

Preach 👍🏾

[@gurugamer8632]

Why not 4k?

[@305kubrick]

@@gurugamer8632 Because the C100 MK II does not shoot in 4k. It has a 4k sensor that down rez's the footage in camera. So basically, the 1080p footage you capture is actually down razzed 4k which gives you great crisp images.

[@gurugamer8632]

@@305kubrick iPhone Better then

[@305kubrick]

@@gurugamer8632 iPhone is great in many regards, but sometimes you just need a proper camera with professional built in features for certain jobs.

[@michaelbeckerman7532]

Great video! I remember the day the C100 was released to market and how big of a deal that actually was at the time. I think today we now look at the Sony FX3 in somewhat of a similar light.

[@georgesealy4706]

I have used the C100 for many projects including broadcast TV commercials. It is a true cinema camera, not a hybrid. People want 4K or DCI, but you can achieve amazing results in 1080p using a high-quality, fast lens and shooting log. I personally like the Zeiss Milvus lenses with apertures at T1.4, but you get the idea. And let us remember that broadcast TV is still not 4K.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Agreed!

[@ChrisParayno]

The mk1 was my introduction to a cinema camera. This was great!

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Appreciate the kind words Chris!

[@lunarvue]

I have one and 3 C100MKIIs. They all still get used regularly and still make us money. Anyone sleeping on these is missing out. Handily the best camera for the coin now and still relevant.

[@whistlingdavetaviner3663]

Hi -- I love the image quality of the C100. Can you get this same look from the C100 Mk2? There are those who say that the Mk2's image quality is a bit more video-like compared to the more 'filmic' look of the Mk1.

[@lunarvue]

@@whistlingdavetaviner3663 We still have a C100MK1 as well. It never gets used these days, but no...the Mark1 has no aesthetic advantage over the Mark2. In fact, for some reason I think our MK1 has a warmer flatter color look at any setting than the MK2s we have. Not sure why, it might just be ours, but I find the MK2 is just a better overall camera and on the used market, likely around the same price as a MK1. If you are looking to pick up one of these cinema cams, its worth it to hold out for MK2.

[@bosskaloi]

Where did you get it?

[@nightdonutstudio]

They do not need to add a lot to it. They can even keep the same sensor (oh well maybe the sensor is too old). 4k up to 60p and 422 10bit or even 60p for 420 10bit. clog3. improved autofocus system. Updated menu, etc. And sell for $2999. I think a lot of people would buy it.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

I agree!

[@Mediahalo]

i still have my mk1, but haven't powered it on in years. not sure why i hang onto it, but it gave me a heck of a lot of mileage when it was my main cam

[@martinryter]

Thanks! Refreshing professionalism, so rare on KZbin.❤

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Appreciate it Martin!

[@joelsmolenaers1783]

I’ve always told myself when I can I’ll buy one just for fun filming. Really enjoyed this , thanks mate!

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

It is such a fun camera! Thanks Joel! What do you shoot on currently?

[@tobiaslofi]

Been trying to save up to buy a C100 since it came out...... I know it is great! (now I would like the C100 m2 for better autofocus), but I'm not primarily working freelance with own cameras anymore so there's no need. Plus here in Norway the only c100 m2 I saw for sale used was still $2500 .... you got lucky at $500

[@doctorcosta]

Make a video on budget 4k cinema camera

[@FilmSpook]

Thanks Nate! Awesome footage. An instant subscriber, here. Best Wishes 🙏🏾

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Much appreciated! Let me know what you want to see more of

[@choppergirl]

I don't do any color correcting at all, so a camera has to get it dead right, right off the SD card. There won't be any color correcting in post. I don't have time for that, and I don't know how, and I don't want to know how... so yeah, kind of a big deal that a camera should get it's exsposure and colors right without any further machinations with it.

[@nycyabber7103]

Honestly, when it comes to the price of lenses, I find the cost of the actual camera unit kind of irrelevant.

[@alessandroaimonetto8026]

Still have my old c100mkii and it rocks!

[@BryanEnsign]

I was debating on getting one of these vs BMPC 4K. Picked up the black magic instead but still love to look at what canon is doing and see what else is out there. Great video!

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Great choice!

[@matuszewskistudio]

i miss this camera, it was a joy to film with it. however, lack of any kind of slowmotion is a bummer

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

It is… I guess the mark ii addresses that.

[@MuleResonatorGuitars]

@@NatesFilmTutorials Isnt this camera the mark ii? Which version has slow motion?

[@RemyRAD]

I might be a retired network TV engineer Pro. Who was there for the birth of, High Definition Video. Back in the late 1980s. Remember the 1980s? When I went to the first High Definition Video Symposium, convention in, was it Switzerland or Germany? I forget? But I was there. Before we had any, high definition video standards. And considering, we got one of the first High Definition, video camera lenses. At NBC-TV where I worked. The lens itself, was $250,000. And was actually, chained. To the camera pedestal. With a most unique and unbreakable chain. Because the lens alone was, $250,000. That is not a typo. That was one quarter of $1 million just for the lens. Of course by, 2004. I had acquired my first, HDV, high resolution, consumer video camcorder. I think I picked up for, $300 in an open box sale. So considering that first cheap consumer camcorder with HDV was around $600 list price. What you got there for $500. Is, an absolute, mind blower! I have no personal problems that it's, 10 years old. In fact. In many ways. That might provide for a better picture. Then a more state-of-the-art version. It'll be softer looking. A little smoother perhaps? Maybe not quite as crisp? WHO CARES!?!? As it's nothing but a larger palette of colors, for you to use. Or so to speak. It shot plenty of feature movies. Nobody complained. Nobody knew. That it wasn't actual film still. And that's really all that matters. It wasn't necessarily designed for, fast action sports coverage? It was designed for, Cinematic, use. And may not have stood up under the rigors of, network television sports coverage? It was one of the first. Of these new cinematic, video cameras. And Canon does not make crappy stuff. They make great stuff. They always have. And now they have found their new calling. With these devices. In competition with Sony and everyone else. No one should stick their nose up at this unit. It is still quite viable. And now for a simply ridiculous bargain! Oh my God! Of course lenses will still cost Ya. But they are some of the best, of the best, in the industry, today. If you could afford them. And so I have not been looking for such devices, myself. As I must be stupid? Last thing I got was 4 Canon XL-1's. And 2 digital video switchers. For my, rock 'n' roll band video productions. As those, Standard Resolution, digital video camcorders. Back in the 1990s. Could actually deliver a widescreen, 30 frame per second progressive, 1.23:1 aspect ratio. That's, Panavision style, Aspect ratio. And with that. It yielded a picture of nearly 1000 lines of resolution. On a Standard Resolution Camcorder. It was record-breaking! Using a, anamorphic, digital vertical squeeze. To the picture. And virtually yielded a high-resolution video. Before we ever had high-resolution video. For the consumers. And the professionals working with no budget. So this is an incredible find! Oh my God! Who would have ever thunk? One of these $8000 beauties for $500?! Oh my Lord! SOLD! Well this is truly a wonderful video you have posted here, sir! Thank you! Thank you. RemyRAD

[@Webrisernl]

Is it worth buying it even if I have a canon r6 with also great video?

[@stevebarnesmedia]

What about transiting to Davinci Wide Gamut?

[@Cinemavigilante]

Is this better for filmmaking then the Black Magic cinema pocket camera?

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

It depends on your use case. The Black magic does have better image quality, but I'd say the C100 is more versatile.

[@MyFriendlyPup]

This is $500 now i remember when this was the must have camera.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Crazy right? So many capable cameras today! I remember when the 5d mark iii was the camera to get haha

[@jacksonjackson9474]

No. The C100 is definitely not going for $500 anywhere else. This was just an INDIVIDUAL deal of the year.

[@RavinderSingh-ft5dw]

Superb analysis dear

[@crissivv]

Hi! What lense do you recommend for don't time filmmakers on this camera?? Thanks for your videos!!!

[@lumenography6790]

Isn’t this cinematch plugin the same thing as the cst? 4:52

[@cinemusicberlin]

This is not a cinema camera, but more for quick shoots and broadcast purposes.

[@Mr007jamster]

Did you take inspiration from DSLR Video Shooter for the thumbnail? :)

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

I straight up copied him lol

[@nullislandlife]

All true a great camera. But, can you get batteries for it?

[@dpc4548]

Ternal nds are a real concern with pl lenses. I'd avoid any cinema camera with them.

[@robertw1871]

Killing that poor Sony, the more modern camera just looks over processed with too much saturation…. Higher resolution isn’t everything….

[@ddespair]

Could you use magic lantern with this camera? I used to use it all the time on my 5d markiii.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Unfortunately magic lantern is not available on the cinema line. It would be amazing if it did!

[@stevegreen9474]

@@NatesFilmTutorials from what I recall the Magic Lantern devs were warned off by Canon TBH I don't know whether you would get much out of it being Magic Lanterned - it already has the shooting assist features - possibly better codecs? It would be interesting to see if it could actually record 4K, even if it were short bursts... It's a bit weird that it can technically shoot 60fps slow motion by shooting 60i, but doesn't have it as a a direct option, or that the codec itself is progressive in an interlaced wrapper Great camera though, and using the external recorder helps

[@HOODCLASSICTELEVISION]

I just checked and this camera is online going for $2k. I’ll just buy another BMPCC 6k rather than a decade old camera.

[@afronomenonstudio]

Does this camera provide a clean hdmi? I would like to use it to shoot on a video switch for a sporting events

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

It does!

[@라랄라-t9s]

Hi. Nice video. I'm planning to purchase this camera but don't know where to buy it. I have gone through those links you posted but found only used ones/damaged ones being available.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Canon no longer makes them so you will have to look on the used market. Keep your eye on for one in good condition!

[@cristianbalate]

Thanks mate, great info :)

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Appreciate it!

[@muratcamofficial]

800-1000 euro is the minimum 2nd hand prijs in Holland.

[@Jay-wr1wh]

C100's picture is much more "filmic" than the Sony.

[@puntura]

Yes I also got that camera in $20.

[@eolaleye]

is there a Nikon equivalent?

[@Jonathan.Gearhart]

Could you attach this to a Ronin gimbal?

[@MrMick560]

just wondering what its like in low light ?

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Right here! 7:42

[@MrMick560]

@@NatesFilmTutorials Many thanks, don't know how I missed that, I watched all the way through.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

All good!

How I know it's only a full hd camera, with a fhd sensor.

[@cinemapure.e]

What's the advantage of Cinematch over Colour Space Transform to match Arri's colour space? Is it just less nodes? Also, wouldn't pushing 8 bit footage to a flatter profile than intended and converting to Rec 709 introduce images artifacts? I used a C100 for my first documentary and I don't remember it having this much lattitude.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Great question! Color space transform tool essential converts it to the same color space. Where Cinematch differs is that they test and compare the different sensors. You can see the difference around 5:13 where I select color space transform and sensor match. You still have to nail your exposure or overexpose and bring back down, otherwise you will get artifacts. If you are careful with how you shoot and color grade you can get some great looks out of it!

[@Mo-sk7xo]

Cameras don't get dated lenses get better

[@gooddoor699]

great video nate hot me to pick one up!

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Ooh nice! Enjoy it!

[@Owlbot]

Instead of Clog1/Cinematch, give OWLCOLOR a try ;)

[@DarinCates]

STOP THINKING ANYONE WILL EVER FIND ONE OF THESE FOR $500

[@Concreteowl]

You can get a Mk1 for $300 without lenses but the lenses will set you back and the batteries will be dying a slow death.

[@2chrispy2handle]

Maybe an eBay search before you make your whiny sad little comment

[@JJohnson313]

I got one today for $460 from MPB

[@emmanuelfelarca7017]

I got one for $240

[@sergiomaldonado7169]

Im getting one today for $450

[@ColorfieldMedia]

Just sold 3 of them. They were my workhorses for years and built my business. Only upgraded for 4K and 6K cameras with 4:2:2. and higher bitrates. They were such amazing cameras. Great video

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Nice! Thanks for sharing! Black magics are a great in of themselves

[@pilsplease7561]

Honestly I would never go higher than 4k maybe 6k only to shoot better 4k but I wouldnt want anything higher due to workload and terrible file sizes.

[@knicement]

Nice, what new cameras did you decide to go with?

[@ColorfieldMedia]

@@knicement went with a Blackmagic 6K and 4K (just sold the 4K), 2 GH5S cams and just grabbed a Lumix S5 IIX also.

[@knicement]

@@ColorfieldMedia thank you

[@Sutterjack]

Great video - I'm part of the C100 M2 cult and I still shoot with it - small, gradable files, insane battery life, decent autofocus, dual card slots, decent EVF, built in XLR audio, NDs!!! If they had made the C100 M3 4.2.2 10 bit 4K they would have sold a million of them. You nailed it on the exposure comment - the C100 codec is unforgiving on underexposure - especially in the shadows. I agree shoot native 850 ISO whenever possible, but I feel it's decent up to 10,000 ISO, Also I personally prefer to shoot wideDR because I honestly feel this early CLOG sucks - Canon has come a long way since. Thanks for the grading tips! The camera is still great for long events, presentations, concerts etc. Hard not to love this ancient, reliable workhorse.

[@georgesealy4706]

I capture the log output on Atomos with ProRes HQ.

[@JohnSobasky-g9f]

Hard to believe they thought not giving it RAW was a good idea. How in the world do you have a cinema camera that doesn’t shoot raw?

[@Sutterjack]

@@JohnSobasky-g9f You're asking a lot from a camera that came out in August 2012 - the biggest question I ask is why would you give a camera a 4K sensor and not have it able to shoot in 4k? Makes zero sense to me.

[@CO8848_2]

8 bit 1080p used, the dynamic range looks like crap, and it probably logged 3 actual years of recording time, with batteries that's almost certainly completely shot. NO THANK YOU.

[@alexshotthese]

You can buy those batteries brand new still thanks to the Komodo using them so Canon has continued to make them. The hours on the camera doesn't degrade the image. If it was taken care of then it'll still operate just fine. It's like a 10-11 year old camera...of course it's going to have only 8bit, but canon's 8bit is surprisingly robust.

[@CO8848_2]

@@alexshottheseWhile it may not have been "degraded", it certainly needs an upgrade. The images in this video look like crap.

[@HonJazzz]

At the end of the day I want to make money and now blow it on expensive gear / hard drives. This camera is a workhorse and if you’re delivering to the web, there are no real compromises.

[@Cinnovations]

My first ever camera back in 2016! Went onto 10bit and 16 bit 4k/6k as the times have changed but this camera is a beast for its time and still relevant for many things. image considering its specs is great.

[@316OceanDaylight]

Damn how much did u pay for it back then?

[@Cinnovations]

@@316OceanDaylight$2.5k… it was $8k (!!!) when released in 2012.

[@Cinnovations]

@@316OceanDaylight $2500 in 2016. It was $8k (!!!) when it came out in 2012.

[@NigelBarros]

It's gnarly how good it can still look! makes me want the MKII now

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Yes sir! Not only that, but it’s so fun to shoot with!

[@alexshotthese]

I used to own the MKII and recently in the past year picked up another one and it has been so fun shooting on it. The image still holds up and, honestly, if you export in 4K and no one is the wiser.

[@vulcan4d]

It is more like $800, or $1000 for a good one.

[@WayneRobsonArtist]

I run both a MK1 and MK2 C100's with a Canon E 24-105 F4 L IS and Canon EFS 17-55 F2.8 (along with my GH5 as a 'floating camera') and they are still absolute beasts! The picture out of them in LOG is very, very gradeable and has a nice creamy quality to it. Plus if you upscale to 4K using Topoaz Video Ai its insane.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Love it! I have yet to try Topaz but have been playing around with Resolves Super Scale feature, it some shots it look terrific. Couldn’t tell it wasn’t 4K. Thanks for sharing!

[@whistlingdavetaviner3663]

Hi -- I love the image quality of the C100. Can you get this same look from the C100 Mk2? There are those who say that the Mk2's image quality is a bit more video-like compared to the more 'filmic' look of the Mk1.

[@WayneRobsonArtist]

@@whistlingdavetaviner3663 Yeah I have both the Mk1 and Mk2...I prefer the Mk2 (even though the footage matches perfectly) as its codec is a bit more optimized and someo fhte added small features make life a wee bit easier. I hope that helps.

[@JonathanRados]

My previous camera was the C100 mkI and it was so amazing. I filmed a 52min documentary with it and it was the most pratical camera I've got. The quality is amazing and the super 35mm is very nice for cinema lovers ! Damn, I miss it...

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Come on Canon, give us a C100 iii!

[@TCJOHNSTONE]

@@NatesFilmTutorials That would be amazing. C70?

[@loudmotion5639]

@@TCJOHNSTONE exactly

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

I suppose the c70 serves that purpose, however I’m not a fan of that formfactor

[@JonathanRados]

@@NatesFilmTutorials I think the C70 is still an hybrid. Specs are very nice but the praticality not.

[@h3xnightmare791]

When I worked on set of a popular tv show in my region, this was the camera that they had on A and B. Fantastic especially for how versatile it is

[@tessamoonproductions8743]

The Pentax k1000 is a modern mirrorless camera? So tired of so much stock footage that is irrelevant and meaningless is videos whose information could be conveyed in 90% less time.

[@johnnguyen-xt9nd]

Dude, I watched your video this morning and just picked up one this afternoon. It came with a canon 18-135mm f3.5-5.6. Man I stocked!

[@sirdudel]

Hmmm, the title is a bit of click-baiting. Why? Indeed - cool camera - but you will never ever get it for 500💲 here in Europe.

[@Alterinc]

Video "500$" amazon 1599$ nice try

[@vladimirtalijan]

I'm still using Mark II after almost 10 years with my C70 as a main camera. It's incredibly easy to match them, which is almost impossible with any mirrorless, the image is too digital on all mirrorless cameras, no mater how good or expensive they are.

[@unbroken1010]

Use a vintage lenes

[@GrabTheSnacks]

best advice using it?

Imagine a black magic pocket in this form factor😅

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

That'd be too smart! 🤣

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Question: What was your first camera? 🎥 Get 10% Off of Cinematch using code "NATE10" www.cinematch.com/purchase/?promoCode=NATE10

[@villageincity99]

lie about the price ..

[@wowmedialtd]

I had a C100 mark1 when they first came out and it was revolutionary compared to the Sony EX3 I was using - when I needed 4K for a project I bought a Sony F7 but hated using it compared to the C100 (better quality but felt like a backward setep) - so bought a C200 as soon as it was released - I'm still getting lovely pictures from it now and although I have a couple of 6K BMPC, URSAs and a LUMIX S5II - it's still my 'go to' run and gun camera - modular but solid as they come, long battery, built in ND, beautiful picture even though it's 8bit apart from the RAW (which seems to make no real difference), great in low light and useable built in viewfinder. Out of all my cameras, when I fly and need something totally reliable, it's the camera I take. I think that the new pricing makes it a bargain. I still have my C100 and used it for an event - picture-wise it totally held up against the C200 and Blackmagics.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Love to hear! Thanks for sharing!

[@grimcity]

As a skateboarder/skate filmer, that top handle looks great. Along with a proper fisheye, it'd be reminiscent of the old classic Sony VX (in utility as opposed to form).

[@marlonstevenson2495]

Love this, but where are you finding this for $500??

[@arri1254]

Where can I find this camera for $500?

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Ebay and Mpb.com can be found for that price. Check the links in the description

[@SBN3vids]

There's like this archeologist wave of camera KZbin that doesn't realize how shitty and overpriced the C100 was

[@stuCameraman1]

😖😖... Canon say its a cinema camera BUT it's not on paper! It's not even up to Broadcast spec 422 at 50mbps (2015) if you was to project Canon c100 footage onto a 'Cinema Screen' you would notice color banding and machroblocking on fast moving footage with fine detail from the 8Bit codec. It has professional in puts and out puts and I see the camera as a work horse tool for weddings, corporate events, budget film making ect... But as a cinema camera.... Theres nothing in the specs that gives it that stamp. And yes Canon has done this before when I bought my 1st canon DSLR 500d I think... was advertised as full HD video but didn't say the frame rate was only 15fps witch is unusable! So I had to shoot everything in 720p. Canons smaller chip camcorders at the time were at full HD and captured to 422 colour to Mpeg2HD I think at 50mbps+ so good for broadcast and low budget films. And I'm not a Canon hater my first camcorders in the 1990s were canovision e90 and a Canon XM1... But then the Sony PDX10 was offering a true 16x9 for the same price. The cheapest cinema camera I can see on the market right now is probably the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera HD as it captures to prores422 at 220mbps or 10bit raw, it's not great on the iso range (you just need faster lenses and a speed booster) only a few inputs and out puts... But on paper it's broadcast spec and raw makes it a cinema camera.

[@DulceCreativeStudios]

You say it has a 4K sensor but only records in 1080? Deal breaker for me.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Understandable, for 1080 it has a great image, but if you need 4K obviously this isn’t the camera for you

[@oospagheti]

the c100 still waaay too expensive in brasil, arround $2500

[@132medianetwork]

Indeed, our world is not balanced. Imagine $500, same product and is sold in my continent around $3500...

[@ChacalProductions]

They offered me a C100 Mark I for a really good price and comes with a hard box and 2 lenses. I have been using Canon 5D and Black Magic, I'm really nervous about thr C100 , some Poeple say it's to old, some say it's all good ... For $1,000 Camera and 2 lenses, I just do Live performances and Music videos. What should I do?

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Hi there! The C100 does have limitations, no 60p, limited bit rate, so you do have to be careful when color grading. I think the C100 is totally worth it if you need an extra angle for performances and documentary work. Ultimately you will have to decide this for yourself. Hope this helps!

[@clivebrincat88]

the c100 was world's apart from being described as insane in it's release date...claiming it'a insane in 2023 is beyond wild.

[@barlux88]

You could even say it’s….insane

[@worldmikel]

$500 camera? Where?

[@richardactor]

Just bought one with the dual pixel autofocus upgrade. 244 hours. $659 USD. I'm so psyched!

[@cjsvinyl]

$500.00 camera, that's funny. For parts maybe.

[@Eyepatchfilms]

They scale very well to 4k with Topaz Ai, also somewhat compensates for the low bitrate

[@benmcnights1763]

Any examples you can link

[@phylumofthefree]

I used that camera mid 2000s, loved it. I think when people say they like the 'canon colors' they are talking about the c100.

[@Gleebi]

genuinely dont understand why they dont bring out a mkiii with the same form factor as the mkii with 10 or 12bit hd 444.

[@NatesFilmTutorials]

Because that would be too logical for Canon.

[@christoroppolo8742]

We’re are you finding these ? Did that include a lens ? How well does it perform in low light? ✌️👽

[@livingtinyinsouthernafrica935]

Where does one get one for $500? Used prices are 3 to 5 times higher than that from Amazon & B&H.

[@egliseevangeliquedelasaint6395]

but you didn't buy this for $500 dollars...not at Amanson....the Canon c100 is under $2,239.95

[@barefootuptomysoul]

My camera is a Canon C100 Mk i with Atomos Ninja V monitor recorder and the lens is a Proscar Anamorphic on a Nikon 50mm or 28mm prime lens. You are right about it being INSANE but today there are medications with very little side effects to take care of that. Okay, going to watch your video now after having commented first to your title.

[@vladbox1]

I shot over 70 TV spots last two years, I would say that 35 were shot with the Canon C100 (with an atomos ninja v) cinema lenses, etc. I know that in two or three instances the footage was bumped to 4K, ALL CLIENTS and AGENCIES were very happy. If you have one KEEP IT, this camera will be like the ARRI SR 16mm, a legend.

[@unbroken1010]

Wow, You sound Rich 💰

[@myblacklab7]

Interesting that you use such expensive lenses with such a cheap camera. May I ask why you don't use a more modern camera?

[@Mims.Entertainment]

"INSANE?" Definition: In a state of mind which prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill. Canon, Sony and others are creating wonderful new cameras that surpass the need for film stock or Arri, Mitchell or Panaflex film cameras that would make it impossible for young or new filmmakers to be able to learn and experience their craft. Now anyone can take their ideas with not much more than a good camera like the one mentioned in this video, a sound package and minor lighting and computer editing and some hard work and rival anything coming out of Dead Hollywood. So why not leave the incorrect slang 'insane' comments to the uneducated street crowd, and move into speaking like a pro and being a pro. You water down your credibility before anyone has even clicked on your video. Just my opinion, with over 30 years in the film industry.

[@SeguraCine]

la Canon se utiliza en mas en rodaje que la sony y una cosa LAS CARAS DE LAS PERSONAS que graba CANON son las mejores del planeta,, no te coman el coco con sony, solo buscas visitas, lo se..no te metas en berengenales.. las sony solo es presencia y mil menus para nada,,,

[@alfredogentili3731]

Could I have a feedback about the usage on portrait and live? Actually social media like Instagram are (unfortunately?) on portrait! I would also use it on IG live broadcast. Thanks for your opinion :)

[@dzpv]

“Even today, you’ll have trouble finding a camera that is this capable”. What are you smoking? You sound very out of touch with the current market. The C100 is a dated 50mbps piece of tat, even low low end projects don’t warrant this - it’s barely worth using as a doorstop!

[@Wazhadnin-wj5te]

I think the pricing that Canon did back then is why I left them. They just completely went out of control and priced themselves out of the market. I'm glad they are making things a little more affordable now but only because Sony, Fuji, Panasonic and other brands caught up. Otherwise, they would be running a muck.

[@drone_33]

This $500 dollar camera is sold at min. $3000. Not sure what the point of this video was, other than a 10 year belated review?