4:00 "...cargo capacity of the airship is remarkable...132 pounds!" That IS remarkable. Remarkably small!
@LawpickingLocksmithАй бұрын
If you replace the fat engineer with the lightest sinair hostess it will be more...
@WOLFCGLABАй бұрын
You are right. They should have said more accurately, "Carrying capacity 60 tons."
@DLWELDАй бұрын
I had to listen to it twice!
@Construimus_BatuimusАй бұрын
All you had to do was Google it. Capacity = 60 tonne, 1 tonne = 1 kg, 1 kg = 2200 pounds, 60 x 2200 = 132,000 pounds.
@RB-qg1qxАй бұрын
I was about to post the same thing, it irritates me when these 'innovative' type videos get the facts so ridiculously wrong.
@i12cu22 ай бұрын
You can improve the quality of your videos by specifying not only the US units (such as feet and miles), but also the units used in the rest of the world. Not all of your subscribers live in America. Best regards from Germany.
@QreurАй бұрын
Actually it should read: "Not all of your subscribers live in the 18th century"......
@stratometalАй бұрын
We love our freedom units. Get over it! Also thank pirates for the US not going metric. Its easy to convert using the power of your phone! Seeing as the more sensitive people are us Americans, whom complain far more than the rest of the world about inane things, I can see why they go with the old timey human centric freedom units, instead of the cold inhuman commie metric system(joke). That aside the video could include the units in both systems as text on the screen, easy edit, but I bet this content is AI generated.
@QreurАй бұрын
@@stratometal Aye I guess you have the right to stick to the demands of your old British Colonial Empire... but don't call it freedom. Pure gullibility.
@stratometalАй бұрын
@@Qreur 🤣🤣 The UK will soon be part of the great American Empire, so its all good! Lol, that will be a funny thing! They are called Freedom units because its what was used to dispense freedom and liberate Europe from the Nazis. What is even funnier, in the US Imperial units are officially defined using the metric system, ie a foot is defined in centimeters instead of inches.
@1crazypjАй бұрын
@@stratometal Personally, I don't care about majority of units used except for pressures (WTF is a kpa?) and temperature. Volume in litres is OK as it is very easy to swap back to imperial or US gallons (and what's up with cubic inches in America? that has never made sense?) Centigrade scale is way too limiting only going from 'ice' at zero to boiling water at one hundred. It's completely logical but tenths or hundredths of a degree is very inconvenient I didn't like it in 1970's and don't like it today. In my experience (after living in America 26 years) Americans are not very sensitive but are mostly belligerent and money grabbing while pretending to be 'god fearing' it's why crime is so prevalent at all levels of society (particularly in politics)
@DLWELDАй бұрын
Shows a steam train and talks about internal combustion engines LOL
@me1assassinАй бұрын
This is so full of mistakes, I had to cut it off in less than 4 min's. I'm out.
@ClausKiepАй бұрын
Airships are and always will be very vulnerable to wind conditions, not only underway but specially in ground handling - loading, unloading and parking.
@willdatsunАй бұрын
'140 kilowatts is enough to power a home' OH.. YOU THINK?!
@mal2kscАй бұрын
Orbis drive: "Let's reduce vehicle weight a tiny bit, but double or triple the unsprung weight. Brilliant!"
@joshrawlings2621Ай бұрын
The "Red Bull" drone... A lad & his dad design... Congratulations Guy's... Home made, design, built & Marketing. ✨🏆✨
@polskakielbasa48912 ай бұрын
flying whale "132lbs per flight" has to be a mistake
@cadude1452 ай бұрын
Yea, I loved it. It's remarkable maybe a 15 year old at best. 😂
@mach1553Ай бұрын
Tons maybe 🤔
@Construimus_BatuimusАй бұрын
@@mach1553 *_Metric ton_* = 1000 kilograms, 1kg = 2200 pounds, x 60 = 132,000 pounds. Google: "cargo capacity of a flying whale."
@outsider7658Ай бұрын
I am only a stupid Engineer, but en light me: Where, does a steam locomotive, have a "Internal combustion engine"?? You should get the facts right, before, making a video! Take a look at those comments below also. There will not be, a "next time", for me.
@johncherian3942Ай бұрын
To "elighten" you......Strictly speaking, heat is provided to the pressure boiler through the combustion of some fuel eg coal! Then you have the steam cylinder and pistons, seals etc. Can the above magic work for the esteemed engineer?
@outsider7658Ай бұрын
@@johncherian3942 👍. Yes, but still not a "internal combustion engine", by definition.
@johncherian394229 күн бұрын
@outsider7658 who's definition? The coal is burning inside a combustion chamber inside the engine 🤔...
@outsider765828 күн бұрын
@@johncherian3942 Sorry Buddy, but I am a steam Engineer, also, with experience/education of, how to use a steam turbine and boiler. The "fuel", either coal or diesel, or anything, is burning inside the BOILER", not the actual "power unit". In this case, the steam operating part of a engine. The power, is created with the power of expanding steam, not "a exploding fuel", meaning a ICE! Referred here. I am sorry, if I hurt Your feelings, but right got to be right. Take this as a joke, not a insult. Have a Nice Day, You too. 😀🤣
@johncherian394228 күн бұрын
@outsider7658 yes, I was pushing the envelope of the description. 😉
@nathanmoses1953Ай бұрын
They finally solved dancing robot dogs. Adding a dog costume was another bit o' genius!!
@neblina5Ай бұрын
Memories, sweet memories, rediscovering yourselves is always fun, can anyone remember that everything you invent, your kind has already had before, it's a repressed memory, kudos, now make it possible to leave this place before it's too late.❤
@PerpetualMan22Ай бұрын
Hollow tiles make people fall down ...
@skogsjarvenab7958Ай бұрын
Excellent, now you can go nowhere by moving. Fantastic.
@SpiderF27Ай бұрын
All those solar panels for just a private home? That's the biggest bullcrap i came across in a long time....
@yankee2yankee216Ай бұрын
That last one, the wheel that changes shape as it rolls, seems like “reinventing the wheel!” That and replacing the simplest machine in the world, which works great, with an extremely complex alternative! That alternative is guaranteed to be MUCH more expensive to make, and much less reliable than the original design…
@astounded45462 ай бұрын
The airship can only hold 132 pounds of cargo?!
@jenniferjohnson93022 ай бұрын
i was like huh? 🤣
@seanmalloy7249Ай бұрын
Teeny tiny wind turbine blades...
@yankee2yankee216Ай бұрын
That huge, expandable solar array can power a single private home? Wow! That’s not very good…
@stevehayward1854Ай бұрын
The Orbis wheel is too late, EV's have made it simpler by not needing a transmission, they have just got a motor connected to the wheel. Braking is mainly carried out by regenerative braking, brake pads and discs last for multiple 100,000 miles
@eddybowe2953Ай бұрын
That train in china is a bus.
@grantsoliman8231Ай бұрын
“Light weight wheels reduce un-sprung mass” except there’s a motor attached to it that weighs as much as for wheels 🤦♂️
@alimeteozcanАй бұрын
It is very sad that so much unnecessary money has been spent on vehicles made for luxury and extravagance and weapons in the name of innovation, while the world is facing so many critical issues.😢
@gargoylebАй бұрын
11:49 You're going to have problems with the hydraulic lines. You're changing the way the lines were designed to be used. That many more rapid adjustments to the flaps are going to put more stress on them.
@Outlaw_Traffic_StopsАй бұрын
Boycott Disney
@DennisRichardHАй бұрын
132 pounds of cargo wow that's amazing!
@StephenTiniusАй бұрын
14:40 - Orbis Ring Drive - Interesting concept with potential. I would be concerned about the vulnerability of the relatively very expensive components being subject to vibration, shock, impact and damage inside the wheel rim. Hit the curb sharply and suddenly you're driving on three "cylinders". And wait for the bill!!
@dougaltolan3017Ай бұрын
Transmission gears (ring gear) exposed to road dirt... I'd give it 10 miles.
@mal2kscАй бұрын
Shaving off a small amount of total vehicle weight, but increasing the unsprung weight by a much greater proportion, just doesn't sound like an optimal trade to me. That's aside from the vagaries of gearing being that much closer to the road itself, and being shaken to pieces because it's all below the springs.
@theclearsounds3911Ай бұрын
@@dougaltolan3017 Yeah, road dirt. Also snow, ice, and the all-time worst enemy, road salt in the winter.
@NICEFINENEWROBOTАй бұрын
Pipedreams and clickbait and some useless information, supposed to fire my imagination...
@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xtАй бұрын
The editors/narrators of this video need to get their facts correct. Garbage In -- Garbage Out.
@timgray5763Ай бұрын
The blimp could replace the Ice Road truckie service, when its able to lift more then just the pilot !
@Construimus_BatuimusАй бұрын
1 flying whale carries about as much as 2 ice road trucks. The closed captioner left off a comma and 3 zeros. 132,000 pounds.
@stefanweilhartner4415Ай бұрын
the hydrogen train is doomed to fail
@ismoleppanenАй бұрын
The Chinese 'super tram' is just a glorified bus.
@nathanmoses1953Ай бұрын
That woman had to lean in four feet in order to put her groceries far enough into the trunk that it would be able to close. Next stop is the hospital for back pain issues.
@astounded45462 ай бұрын
If the fence panels are vertical, won’t that interfere with farming since they will cast a shadow in morning and afternoon and the plants won’t get enough sun?
@kat7rm2 ай бұрын
Orientation east to west.
@astounded45462 ай бұрын
@@kat7rm Exactly. Isn’t the sun shining from the east in the morning and from the west in the afternoon? Good for the solar, but creates shade on the land.
@seanmalloy7249Ай бұрын
@@kat7rm If they're aligned east to west, the efficiency of the panels depends on the latitude of the installation, making them more efficient at high latitudes, but less efficient at low latitudes. Aligning them north to south increases the shadowing effect on the plants between them, but it also means that the panels will provide more energy during the early morning and late afternoon periods, where conventionally sited panels' production drops off. Just like everything else, it's a tradeoff.
@briannebeker2119Ай бұрын
Also the fields needs to get plowed every season and that could undermine the foundations of the solar fence.
@danpatratzel972Ай бұрын
the sun best penetration is beetwin 10 in the morning and 14 afternoon, and I think those vertical PV don't get much sun and will produce a small quantity of electricity.
@JoeyBlogs007Ай бұрын
11:49 Is interesting. Functions a bit like a crude bird's wing, rapidly reacting to the wind and turbulence.
@JoeyBlogs007Ай бұрын
Problem is of course it could produce more wear and tare on flaps and ailerons and the actuators that control them.
@NoferTrunionsАй бұрын
After about 5 minutes, the music is distracting/annoying.
@AtomicHermitАй бұрын
If "Hydrogen" is an alleged answer, somebody almost certainly asked the wrong question.
@josephohara7407Ай бұрын
That transformer wheel looks like a real smooth ride
@QreurАй бұрын
06:35: You call that an INternal combustion engine? It's an EXternal combustion one, that one....
@augenbutter27 күн бұрын
If the flying whale drops its 1500 passengers, then it'll still have room for 10 crew and 131 tonnes of cargo. A wind turbine blade weighs 16 + tons.
@mach1553Ай бұрын
Orbis Ring Drive - This looks interesting, but hitting a curb or deep pothole may destroy the mechanism.
@kurtu5Ай бұрын
Blocking this channel
@nathanmoses1953Ай бұрын
Except...nobody is going to let you fish by their wave generator.
@roberthoopleАй бұрын
Say NO to flying cars!
@wickedcabinboyАй бұрын
Entertaining fantasies. Some interesting ideas. Nothing really new though.
@PatibokeАй бұрын
Blimps are great for transporting huge loads (in tons, not pounds), except for one problem: when they deliver the payload you have to attach something equally heavy to the blimp, or it will shoot off into the stratosphere, so to speak. This is a really big problem that caused several manifacturers to abandon the idea alltogether. Flying cars are a bad idea. They can't be good cars and good planes at the same time and even if they could, the world is not ready for such a huge energy consumption for every driver/pilot.
@seanmalloy7249Ай бұрын
The alternative to adding more ballast when you offload cargo is to pump down the lift gas into storage tanks, which doesn't require loading and unloading ballast as the vessel's load changes. Alternatively, you can have pressure cells that are inflated to compress the lift gas cells, making their contents denser and reducing their lift capacity.
@mal2kscАй бұрын
If flying cars were a great idea, someone would have figured out how to make a helicopter that can taxi on the ground because that basically would be a flying car -- just highly optimized for the "flying" part.
@seanmalloy7249Ай бұрын
@@mal2ksc People are crazy enough in two dimensions; I don't want to _think_ about what, say, LA traffic would look like in three dimensions. There would need to be a *lot* more overriding traffic control before I'd be even vaguely comfortable with flying cars being generally available. Think the sort of regimentation you saw with aircars on Coruscant in the Star Wars movies, or in the Fifth Element. And even then it was possible for people to be idiots.
@PatibokeАй бұрын
@@seanmalloy7249 I also think about the 5th Element whenever I hear about flying cars. 😉
@seanyounk1Ай бұрын
14:45 for the actual wheel in the title.
@mutantryeffАй бұрын
This channel needs to apply an s-filter or get a better microphone. The sound is harsh.
@gargoylebАй бұрын
That first one alone will completely change the theater going experience.
@jamesnobles1Ай бұрын
An average man weighs about 140 lbs so that airship is a waste of investment since it can only carry 132lbs. I am surprised you listed it, that is no innovation, that is a huge setback.
@TheoryintestingАй бұрын
@@jamesnobles1 I’m going to say not much has changed since the first one was made but it supposedly was just a guy smoking on a cigarette! Like an mechanic back then wast smart enough to know what would happen
@ChrisBigBad16 күн бұрын
The pelted robot reminds me a lot of Sprocket, the dog puppet of the Fraggles. :)
@eddiedegoede365Ай бұрын
Bmw is a joke They're still not capable of building a competitive EV, so they build another piece of junk and spend millions on chameleon paint jobs
@EdBowl4 күн бұрын
This video excellently highlights how much money is wasted on obviously ridiculous ideas.
@CyberKnightX21Ай бұрын
132 pounds! That's amazing!
@yankee2yankee216Ай бұрын
Wow! That airship has the ability to transport up to 132 lbs of cargo per flight? That’s AMAZING! I could transport about that much on my back, if I had to…
@mariano7699Ай бұрын
Paleolithic measurement unit😮
@johnking6252Ай бұрын
It's magic !
@aaronsmith593Ай бұрын
I feel the same way being in America, it's frustrating to see everyone in other countries online videos using the metric measurements, kilometers and Celsius. But if you're smart, you can do the math conversion. 😊
@bossdog1480Ай бұрын
When the X59 breaks up midair, that will make a bang.
@tortysoftАй бұрын
delighted by the technology, distressed by the military use
@gtpc7986Ай бұрын
I’d like to see a Nimbus style vehicle with Solap Terra technology to power it.
@Brandon-dg9luАй бұрын
I think railways can be reused or even upgraded as discussed in this video. For instance, in our part of the country having the ability to use the railway when there are blizzards or ice storms it would be helpful to use railway rather than drive on the roads
@ossiepadrino4513Ай бұрын
more science, less politics
@feedingravensАй бұрын
"Flying Whales" - that is just a rehash of the german "Cargoliftter" decades ago. A sensation, on the first glance a stroke of genius (avoids the ordeal of transporting oversized objects on the road) It got lots of attention and of governmental support. They built a giant hangar to be even able to build and house the 300-meter long airship. And suprise, surprise, when the hangar was built, the whole project was cancelled - and the hangar was redesignated into a tropical leisure park. Almost as if the whole was planned from the start to get the allowance and support for this park...
@gregmckenna3858Ай бұрын
The train cars were impressive
@mazinhashim47472 ай бұрын
Use sections please
@davidclark3304Ай бұрын
Sorry to post twice. But I gotta say--did he actually say "kilo Newtons" at 31:14?
@toddbellows5282Ай бұрын
pie in the sky
@ericn3221Ай бұрын
132 pounds per flight? Less than one adult. Sounds like an AI mistake.
@TheLotionInTheBasket23 күн бұрын
132 lb of cargo... 😂😂😂
@TheTruthPlease100Ай бұрын
Get ready to be amazed! You've seen nothing yet!
@BudKashАй бұрын
Maybe that should be 132 Tons per flight, or more likely 132,000lbs, which would be 66 Tons. With a blimp that size that number is within reason. Good idea, I don't know why their use has diminished to virtually zero considering their utility. I used to see the old GoodYear blimps cruising overhead where I grew up regularly, usually during festivals and near the local international airport. They had the old style scrolling display along the side panel. Probably regulated out of business. People became afraid of Hydrogen for this purpose after the Hindenburg disaster, but word has it now that it may have been sabotage. The buoyancy of H2 is significantly more than Helium, and we have no problem containing the extremely small molecules with modern polymer materials.
@splagyetsi3287Ай бұрын
Turn off the narration and just view the video.
@TheoryintestingАй бұрын
Just watch this video and feel like I need a therapist to help me sort through the lofty fog like brain clutter that has surrounded my pineal gland and holding it hostage..! God it’s me again, get me out of this mess and I promise I wont get in this situation again, no I thought it was gonna be alright.. 😢
@LawpickingLocksmithАй бұрын
dreamers...
@ghanjahmanАй бұрын
Wavepiston 💯 I have a similar concept
@halicon7475Ай бұрын
flying whale has 60-tonne payload capacity not 132 pounds
@steverobbins427411 күн бұрын
You showed a steam engine and stated they are internal combustion engines. lol. They are external combustion engines as they are powered by steam pressure cause by a fire outside of the engine.
@duudsuufdАй бұрын
That Origami wheel at 32:39 , they can never go fast and certainly not follow curves at a certain speed. But maybe they can be useful on 'rovers' on other planets, where it is not always known if they will get in loose or rocky ground.
@viscache1Ай бұрын
Omg! NO ONE wants “essential oils” infused in their car! Like cars don’t stink bad enough after a while so we have to pump up the smells?
@Backinthegame.Ай бұрын
Concord only went supersonic over the Atlantic ocean, the fact is that the Americans didn't think of it themselves, so they banned it.
@briannebeker2119Ай бұрын
Add on top of that the fact the concord failed because of the costs.
@davidclark3304Ай бұрын
This makes me think of an old adage of mine--never invest in something featured in Popular Mechanics.
@josepeixoto3384Ай бұрын
dammm... where is da wheel.............. 1 more no like
@johnnisshansen6 күн бұрын
metric units are universal not only for americans. it is arrogant not to provide metric units.
@DrewBreezyWritersАй бұрын
This gives the same vibes as the old show BEYOND TOMORROW
@nathanmoses1953Ай бұрын
"Transfered full control of the helicopter to the Matix system (aka Skynet)."
@ShinobubuАй бұрын
this is not a tram it's a BUS...
@gyrogearloose1345Ай бұрын
At four minutes into the video - still no mention of "the innovative wheel" ? Bye bye . . .
@SnarlyWhiplashАй бұрын
I wonder what one of those robot dogs would do if it was attacked by a real dog??
@NiallRigbyHKАй бұрын
"this will help tackle the 55% increase in and turbulence occurring on most airliner routes due to global warming" Says who? This sounds like propaganda to me ... Other commenters have pointed out multiple issues with other information presented in this video.
@Starbuck.LaniakeaАй бұрын
Your use of mainstream talking points like ... global warming ... and similar is disappointing.
@garryrichardson4572Ай бұрын
The flying whales wouldn’t work in the Southern Hemisphere as it is normally too windy a lot of the time . I’m in Tasmania, I don’t know what it’s like in South Africa or Chile but here it’s windy 50% of the time. We recently had winds around the 110 kmph.
@nathanmoses1953Ай бұрын
So...an extra long hydrogen powered bus.
@willdatsunАй бұрын
Apteras aren't 3d printed! What are you on?!
@georgegouvas27Ай бұрын
great, hundreds of more people out of work
@stickyreturnАй бұрын
Too many inventions are killing machines.
@RPRosen-ki2fkАй бұрын
FOURTH STORY on the airship ... replayed it twice, then twice more with captions??? One more occurrence like that and I'm BAILING. edit - I made it to the high speed drone, and I think I was ... EXTREMELY OPENMINDED.
@michaeljames5936Ай бұрын
21:25 A This 40kW solar array, cam power a small construction site, or a domestic residence. 40kW! A domestic residence. On a sunny day, this would produce 200 to 400kWh. Which would suffice for 20 to 40 homes. Unless your typical residence has a heated swimming pool.
@mjb12141963Ай бұрын
That's what we need, an electric car with even more electrical drain on the batteries.
@seanmalloy7249Ай бұрын
There is insufficient information in the puff piece about it, but the use of the term "e-ink" suggests that the drain will be low -- with an e-ink display, once the display is set, it does not require power to retain the image, so it's only consuming power when you change it. I would want to see some details, however, on the stability of an e-ink display under the kind of shocks you can expect a car body to experience, and even with hard protective coatings, small amounts of damage to the display circuitry can render large portions of the car surface nonfunctional -- bodywork costs are going to be many times that of a conventional car.
@ommadammoАй бұрын
Skip to 23:38 for the clickbait title actual content. Content ends in under 30secs later.