Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacerace.news/subscribe
@winkekatze55932 ай бұрын
It's not Nasa that developed this, but Sierraspace. So it's not Nasas habitat.
@PiDsPagePrototypes2 ай бұрын
SpaceX won't land off the Australian coast for Recovery. They'll do the burn sooner and land at Diego Garcia, a US base. They could do a landing at a tower, or park a barge in the lagoon.
@shazmosushi2 ай бұрын
your map of the US at 4:55 goes well into Canada, at least on the west coast
@bazoo5132 ай бұрын
Naughty, naughty title! 😂 This is a spectacular result.
@ValidatingUsername2 ай бұрын
The size of a house!
@JAmonOfficial2 ай бұрын
True 😁
@dougaltolan30172 ай бұрын
Yup, but I'll forgive them.
@laurids_dk78132 ай бұрын
We're gonna find life on MARS before GTA VI
@williamcase4262 ай бұрын
i hope so
@On-down-the-road2 ай бұрын
I think we will find that humans are already multi planetary! I believe humans ruined Mars and moved to Earth. That explains everything from pyramids and lots of other thing's that don't make any sense otherwise. I think Genius people are too smart to have common sense. It's life, not science.
@nightlightabcd2 ай бұрын
I seriously doubt it.
@curtisgauthier92052 ай бұрын
id be pleased
@BringSomePros2 ай бұрын
Idk man they say it every time but that is false lol
@SebastianWellsTL2 ай бұрын
Congratulations on 300k subscribers! I love your channel!
@TheSpaceRaceYT2 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@juzeus92 ай бұрын
*MMOD? - massive multiplayer orbital dormitory.* *what's your superhero name? - atomic oxygen.*
@Paul_C2 ай бұрын
Reminds me of the problem with an airplane: you do not incorporate square holes. The British had a nice plane, it didn't survive...
@Relkond2 ай бұрын
if memory serves, It survived to, was it, within 1000 pressure cycles of the estimated failure point? They just hadn't bothered to do that math until after an aircraft vanished in the middle of a radio transmission.
@nightlightabcd2 ай бұрын
@@Relkond The square windows cracked at the corners!
@malcolmstreet12 ай бұрын
It was the Comet. Square windows had been fine on pressurised piston engined airliners, but the higher altitudes and higher speeds of a jet meant the pressure cycles were larger and more frequent.
@geesehoward7002 ай бұрын
I don't think we even need inflating stations anymore now we have very large diameter rockets coming online. A modified starship would be more than wide enough for a station
@jokerace82272 ай бұрын
There was a similar type of sharp corner flaw in the design of the Titanic's hull that contributed to the ship breaking apart easier.
@rb80492 ай бұрын
What matters is not burst pressure but chance of bursting after UV exposure and atomic oxygen and micro meteoroids all in combination.
@chrishudson69682 ай бұрын
As an Australian. It would be incredible to see a spacex launch from my country. I hope this goes ahead.
@malcolmstreet12 ай бұрын
Don't forget back in the '60s Woomera was the biggest space and missile test site outside the two superpowers. Two satellites were launched from there and one (Propero) is still in orbit.
@chrishudson69682 ай бұрын
@@malcolmstreet1 That's an amazing fact. I'm really keen to see a rocket launch or landing. If I don't have to leave Australia for it, that would be awesome!
@Ac_a2 ай бұрын
It’d be More Likely the U.S. turning Australia into another Ukraine via another of it’s Proxy Wars.
@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt2 ай бұрын
Come to nz. Normal event . Lol.
@robot3362 ай бұрын
Australia does not exist , it's all big conspiracy maaaate 😃😃🍻🍻
@caseyodonnell552 ай бұрын
weve been weeving baskets for 1000s of years and now were weeving balloons for space.....
@ghost3072 ай бұрын
Why risk a window failure when you can just mount cameras outside and video screen inside?
@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze2 ай бұрын
Good point
@carter_schulz2 ай бұрын
I guess bc windows are nicer and if it's possible to make a window without it weakening the structural integrity, might as well do it
@jamesvertrees58572 ай бұрын
The article also said the test was to check if the mounting plate for a robotic arm would hold.
@olivier-pierredebelmont.36302 ай бұрын
And for the look,just paint windows in 3d! 😅
@geehammer15112 ай бұрын
Yeah it wasn't just to see if a window can be there but other things that could be useful.
@akmurf74292 ай бұрын
Good idea! Like setting your tent up, in outer space. Lightweight and easy to transport. You can haul the equipment and supplies in subsequent missions. Build the house and then furnish it.
@sonicsupersam77932 ай бұрын
thought this was a re upload until i read the last part of the title hahaha
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
me too
@lizmramsey68522 ай бұрын
I loved the picture of the robot driving on mars!! So adorable
@davebooth56082 ай бұрын
I can’t believe a cord of wood just fell on my feet
@superintendent11522 ай бұрын
u good homie?
@davebooth56082 ай бұрын
@@superintendent1152 no, but I’m fine. Just won’t be using my gyroscopic lucky mood watch for a week or a day. Thanks for asking yo!
@robmsmithdumbhandle2 ай бұрын
Good video. Very informative. Thanks, SR!
@Relkond2 ай бұрын
They made the patch....square? The mad lads!
@dougaltolan30172 ай бұрын
The bit you see is square.. The bit you don't see is???
@randyblake20062 ай бұрын
This photo at 10:15 looks similar to melted metal caused by welding. The flecks of green material look welded into place. The entire reddish area may have been melted at the same time. It would have been a gigantic kind of welding arc reaching between planets. Man, what a show that must have been!
@KRANYEN2 ай бұрын
Seeing all of this only increases my admiration for Subnautica.
@spaceted39772 ай бұрын
Yes, it's made of indestructible polythene, specially designed to land on the Moon, and the Sun (At Night).
@okirooju37878 сағат бұрын
Maybe Starship can't be the long-term, permanent space station solution most people expect, but what if it fills the niche of a sort of temporary, short-term space station for limited to large crew capacity? Here's what I mean: 1) Have 'Space Station' variant starships that can be launched to orbit with astronauts and everything they'll need for their mission. 2) Launch the space station into orbit and let it remain there (days, weeks, months) for as long as the mission requires. 3) Deorbit and land it at the end of the mission with the astronauts, and do necessary refurbishments or feature additions. *You could have a docking adaptor/interface for emergency/ad-hoc crew and supplies ingress/egress. This provides a unique, reusable space station solution for special use cases. This is especially a good solution for space tourism. You'd have no need for crew transfer between spacecraft AND station as the spacecraft IS the station. EDIT: You could then have hundreds of Starship Space Stations up there with thousands of astronauts (on different missions) or even tourists. Again, just land the starships whenever they complete their missions
@olivier-pierredebelmont.36302 ай бұрын
Nice, cool, and clean report.thank you!😊
@parkerrabineau12322 ай бұрын
They should land the ship on a drone ship and tow it back so you can get hands on and a visual of what is left after re-entry because things can be missed based on computer data
@OldMan8542 ай бұрын
Let’s hurry up and get those space bugs back here. 😂😂😂
@Leo-x3c2 ай бұрын
I knew bob Bigalow he used to explain his research with me there is no such thing as bad publicity just brings world wide knowledge to your organization
@lizmramsey68522 ай бұрын
Nite hope to have lunch sometime soon!!
@miker32982 ай бұрын
Impressive, saves bringing the astronauts back.
@DrunkenDemon2 ай бұрын
This is so cool to see.
@bluesteel83762 ай бұрын
Since when did NASA decide to use Sierra Space to make a space station? Last I heard NASA is building a lunar space station that does not use these inflatables and has no plans for a LEO space station. The only station I have heard of using these inflatables is a private station being made by Sierra Space and Blue Origin.
@TheSpaceRaceYT2 ай бұрын
NASA has already invested 172$ million into Orbital Reef so that they can use it after the ISS is gone
@bluesteel83762 ай бұрын
@@TheSpaceRaceYT Oh, interesting I did not realise that.
@WilliamBusuttil2 ай бұрын
Please make a vid about this news, thanks.@@TheSpaceRaceYT
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman2 ай бұрын
Great video...👍
@tomsanders55842 ай бұрын
Looks like Sierra Space is doing a bit more testing than the goofballs at OceanGate.
@gottfriedheumesser19942 ай бұрын
The old story: If scientists say, there is a hint that something could be done, journalists sell it as a fact.
@noneofyourbeeswax012 ай бұрын
It seems curious that the inflatable space has a square blank plate, suggesting they're going to have square windows. It's long been known the circular windows or portholes are far less susceptible to sudden catastrophic failure so it seems a strange choice to make.
@teresashinkansen94022 ай бұрын
They are not using a 50 cal. They are using light gas guns (LGG) which accelerate projectiles to speeds of 7.6 km/s or more, that's 9 times faster than the muzzle velocity of a 50 BMG which means that a projectile from a LGG has 81 times more energy than a 50 BMG per weight basis and more importantly the terminal ballistics are very different at those speeds even plasma and ionization become a thing.
@oatlord2 ай бұрын
What about shooting it when under pressure?
@spikedpsycho23832 ай бұрын
For starters it was Meant to explode. They are testing inflatable modules hence they filled with air at presures Far beyond manufactured design limits.
@Blindbrick22 ай бұрын
5:50 Looks like a sci-fi prediction of the 1970s. Don't hold your breath.
@spikedpsycho23832 ай бұрын
For record it cost 100 Billion to build the ISS with 10 modules. This single module holds as much internal volume as Half the station......
@abzd98282 ай бұрын
I just wish space travel wasn't fraught with so much peril. There's a vast cosmos out there to explore and we're stuck here on this tiny little grain of sand.
@jlschump2 ай бұрын
did they do the test in a vacuum? I'm curious if that 14psi atmospheric pressure on the outside of the chamber would help and influence the test in a way that when in space it would be weaker than expected? Could be a non issue, just curious.
@lizmramsey68522 ай бұрын
This is amazing
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
Good informative video.
@jcoop36602 ай бұрын
Balloon space house scary! 🥺
@Exaldear2 ай бұрын
Of note is that both times it didn't rupture at the plate either.
@rippingbag2 ай бұрын
Same Biglow Aerospace didn't survive. They would be the ones doing this.
@williamcase4262 ай бұрын
no one can survive space
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
@@williamcase426 Not even Cheech and Chong? Space Coke!
@williamcase4262 ай бұрын
@@k.sullivan6303 no one
@raymie282792 ай бұрын
That 50call rifle looked more like an air cannon just saying
@rockets4kids2 ай бұрын
May the power of Vectran bring prosperity to your house!
@danielt.8573Ай бұрын
I keep wondering if these "balloons" could be used to establish underwater colonies as well?
@sushicraves2 ай бұрын
How will it's the habitat? Hold up under pressure from the inside, making it a very type on and be hit by a rock on your outside
@ahmetmutlu3482 ай бұрын
i think they has to add multiple pressure layer for reliability and ability to fix one layer if ie inner layer damaged and there is space vetween outer and inner pressure layers it can be fixed withing by using outer barrier as shield while inner layer is daaged... ie layers with service space layer and can be kept reliable by using a bridge pressure layer ... so that the stress will be minimal as pressure difference will be lower compared to one pressure layer editions..
@steveg24062 ай бұрын
Micrometeor and space debris damage to ISS have done more damage over the years than was expected and is why planned deorbital demolition. Any inflatable module will have a short lifespan, not permanent.
@werdna19692 ай бұрын
My bicycle's tires are rated for 200 psi, but perhaps that is not a fair or valid comparison.
@gregorymorales12 ай бұрын
If I had the ability to reclaim a SpaceX rocket/any rocket components from the ocean, what rules if any would prevent or limit me doing so?
@Papershields0012 ай бұрын
I’m confused why spacex is even messing around with Australia. Just land the rocket near Hawaii
@philrabe9102 ай бұрын
5:40 ...And you know just how he'd do it: One (or two) giant cargo ships loaded with 90% of the components, tanks, towers, sections of high bay(s), all that plumbing, pre assembled into units, and most of the launch facility including prefabricated concrete panels, etc.. And then a month or two preparing a site, then a month or two to assemble Starbase South... We already know he loves doing outrageous tech bro stunts in Australia! It could also be the sort of thing where he just buys SpaceX a retired cargo container ship and refit it to carry all the oddball chunks and bits (the awkward children of Starbase). Might as well put a Starship assembly line on an additional ship and send that down under too. 😎
@montanausa3292 ай бұрын
Was the balloon contractor wham-o? Just asking if they were the low bidder or Boeing again
@Baronstone2 ай бұрын
As the saying goes, you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet. So, I don't care if it explodes 100 times while they perfect the design. I would rather see that happen in testing on the ground rather than as it deploys in SPACE!
@SimonAmazingClarke2 ай бұрын
Life on earth found by Viking landers in the 70s. Both landers, same bacterial life signatures.
@ethanlamoureux53062 ай бұрын
You know, I can’t recall ever hearing why NASA is so interested in finding life on Mars or any other place other than earth. We’re spending a pile of money on this search, and the question is, why?
@ScuitarRectsАй бұрын
Because “scientists” need a job. After all of the training, there is no unemployment office job description box to check. Create something for them to do, if NASA doesn’t use all of the funds it receives then they will be defunded. That’s just how it is with agencies. They have to ask for more as if they’re on to something really really important. Good luck🌸
@andyspoo22 ай бұрын
Ok, great. But I have yet to see them fire something at it that would represent a tiny particle travelling at speed hitting the thing. Even a flake of paint travelling around the earth can cause serious damage to the space station, so what would be the effect of it hitting a highly pressured vessel?
@Notdave292 ай бұрын
Same as it would be for an aluminum one. A small one would just make a small hole, which they would notice from gradual loss of pressure, find the leak, and put a piece of tape over it temporarily. Get up into bigger pieces that weigh ounces and are measured in inches and could definitely be catastrophic. it’s also not a highly pressurized vessel, it’s about 15 psi.
@catprog2 ай бұрын
Such as at around 2:32?
@speedymccreedy87852 ай бұрын
SpaceX should build space facilities at Cape York in Australia, there ain't no FAA there.
@leatherindian2 ай бұрын
I wonder what the burst strength of metal space station modules is.
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
Olivine? Probably nice on Greek Salad.
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
Obviously Popeye was from Mars then.
@Contrarian-ol2bc2 ай бұрын
LOL Crunchy... your teeth would be what breaks though. Olivine is a mineral made of magnesium iron silicate with the chemical formula (Mg,Fe)2SiO4. It is a type of nesosilicate or orthosilicate. The primary component of the Earth's upper mantle,[9] it is a common mineral in Earth's subsurface, but weathers quickly on the surface. Olivine has many uses, such as the gemstone peridot (or chrysolite), as well as industrial applications like metalworking processes.
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
@@Contrarian-ol2bc I know this is a little off topic, but did you hear about all the wildfires in Greece last year?
@k.sullivan63032 ай бұрын
@@Contrarian-ol2bc I can't believe the Greeks didn't know you can't use water to put out a Greece fire! 🤣🤣🤣
@Contrarian-ol2bc2 ай бұрын
@@k.sullivan6303 I did not, where they anything like the Maui fires?
@thebobloblawshow88322 ай бұрын
They have known about ancient life on Mars for decades.
@lizmramsey68522 ай бұрын
Good morning
@BurgerMeisterGang2 ай бұрын
The balloon habitats are hopeful due to low cost for the high internal volume. I suppose a protective cube-like framework around the balloon can be covered with impact proof carbon fiber panels. Dr. Robert Murray Smith here on KZbin invented a high impact carbonfiber plastic-like material. This can protect the balloon from small meteorites , space debris, and possible accidental collisions, fender benders and-or rocket exhaust.
@billlyell83222 ай бұрын
Why would you put a window in this module when you can just glue a wireless camera to see outside. Yes a arm/robot mount is useful but why weaken the shell for a silly window?
@handyalley23502 ай бұрын
Nasa make good tshirts.
@FrancoisEustache-ed6gd2 ай бұрын
NASA is one of the PR sources for maintaining the myth that the US is the world's leader in R&D of new technology.
@seekerstan2 ай бұрын
With a starship @ 9m, why bother unless you plan to build a much larger than 9m station?
@TheSpaceRaceYT2 ай бұрын
They've got some future concepts that go up to 19 meters diameter inflated, using the 9 meter Starship fairing to launch
@Trinergy-Livewire2 ай бұрын
Space version of Titan 😮
@larryfromchicago65262 ай бұрын
Ecology of reefs off the coast of Australia may be problematic.
@olgamueckl99972 ай бұрын
How the shells are build. I just remember in an old scientific amer an article, which says one of the Most stable Material ist when ist knitted, i.e knitted Carbon faser
@Stevie-L-n8g2 ай бұрын
Unless they make them with Faux gravity, it's pointless. All future stations ships should have them in various sizes, or something like the craft in The Martian or Interstellar, so a waste of time, especially for long journeys.
@stormyridgegirl52292 ай бұрын
The USA signed an OK to export our rockets to AU a year ago.
@thomassawyers85872 ай бұрын
Why can't we have a rotating space station like on 2001 a space Odyssey to create that artificial gravity
@SynthRockViking2 ай бұрын
On earth it needs a lot more pressure to stay inflated than in space
@jase42702 ай бұрын
I don't even see the point in having a space station
@battlebotts2 ай бұрын
By space they mean on a balloon in the sky
@bryancuthill33372 ай бұрын
Substituting cameras for windows seems to make windows irrelevant other than for issues related to someone’s egos
@SmokeTooMuch-e2s2 ай бұрын
Mr, Tagert I think they had to meny beans.
@lasarith22 ай бұрын
2:36 .50 calibre is 18-20 kilojoules of energy .
@malakiblunt2 ай бұрын
starship as a miltary point to point cargo rocket is such an absurd idea you could shoot one down with small arms fire , - ther presurised flying fuel tanks made of paper thin steel - and were could it even land ? or be refuled to take off again -
@mikehawes22 ай бұрын
Not a fan of inflatables in space. Reminds me of Oceangate. Go with stainless!
@aienthusiast6182 ай бұрын
how would you fit that in a rocket-
@juzeus92 ай бұрын
@@aienthusiast618 *disassembled*
@mikehawes22 ай бұрын
@@aienthusiast618 The upper stage of Starship could either carry it up as payload, or a modified Starship could actually be the station.
@aienthusiast6182 ай бұрын
@@mikehawes2 fair
@davidrobertson5700Ай бұрын
Anyone tested this on Kentucky ballistics range ? To test for micro meteorites ? Just think a grain of sand doing 10 miles a second is more than a 50 cal doing it's speed. Try it out and see how it goes please
@XCX2372 ай бұрын
I don't know about this thing. I know it tests well but can't help thinking they are missing something 🤔
@kjetilhvalstrand10092 ай бұрын
You can’t land rockets in reefs of the cost Australia, there protected areas.
@PiDsPagePrototypes2 ай бұрын
Title and opening script is troublesome, as mainstream media will see 'exploded' and assume failure. And this was no fialure in any way. Both "Test to Destruct" events have been massive successes, thanks to how far Sierra have exceeded the design specifications.
@lizmramsey68522 ай бұрын
Sweet dreams night!!
@MtnBoar2 ай бұрын
There is life where there is funding 😎
@vc73932 ай бұрын
Vectran is not just made for outer space.
@asanseil55532 ай бұрын
WTF am I doing here, waiting for the space hotel in 2027 that's now a "maybe" in 2030? lmao
@ScuitarRectsАй бұрын
Who needs all of that when you have ai and the internet lol
@jase42702 ай бұрын
Ocean gate vibes going on here
@WilliamBusuttil2 ай бұрын
2-08-2024. Please, tell me what happened to Biglow, are they now Searra.
@brunonikodemski24202 ай бұрын
This is misleading In that NASA is NOT shooting a 50-cal bullet at this structure, with equivalent mass and energy. The gas gun has an aperture which allows a small "particle" to free fly through the vacuum barrel at varying speeds and energies. We had such guns for hyper-velocity physics studies, and achieved speeds well in excess of 50,000 FPS for various material studies, and re-entry simulations. Our guns had 6+inch openings, and allowed larger objects to go through, which resulted in better modeling. However, this required a massive propulsion system, and as a result, most normal use systems use a smaller barrel opening, and shorter distances, so that don't need massive facilities like our range, which was a several hundred foot long building...
@robn022 ай бұрын
Bigolow built the original inflatable space module, wonder what happened to company..
@WatZ-In-Ur-Head2 ай бұрын
Windows... are not an essential design feature. Camera... Monitor... This is why we're doomed as a species.
@raymie282792 ай бұрын
I hope Australia doesn't let them do this because its not good for the delicate ecosystem
@On-down-the-road2 ай бұрын
So this habatat could fit inside starship, inflated?
@alglen92082 ай бұрын
Stockton Rush type 2.0
@doglegjake67882 ай бұрын
All of the Wall Street NASA investors got duped in to buying a huge septic tank With a helicopter jet engine on it 😂