This is the SUPER-Takumar 28mm f/3.5. Chapter 27.

[@red_code]

Thanks to @Tonellacam for correcting me about the generation of this lens. Correcting, the first version doesn't have a product number, filter thread is 49mm, aperture is from f/3.5 to f/22. My lens, which is a second-generation, has the same number of glass elements as its predecessor, but with optical improvement.

[@seoulrydr]

Comparisons are always welcome - thanks for the video!

[@bramwb8515]

Thank you for the informative videos. Love the videos on the Takumars!

[@red_code]

Thanks for your comment.

[@PitNeex]

Indeed this lens looks very sharp and with quite controlled flaring

[@red_code]

I agree with you and I've noticed that Japanese lenses, even if they flare, you get nice flaring like the TOPCON RE AUTO-TOPCOR 2.5cm F3.5 (chek it out) like a "shower of rays".

[@PitNeex]

@@red_code I will check it out! Thanks !

[@pomphotothailand]

Good job ....Welcome to Chiang Mai Thailand.

[@red_code]

Thank you. I may say, Thailand is my first destination, and love you people. It's in my mind, to the end of this month, a trip to Koh-Samed paradise. See you next.

[@johan0234523]

Very nice! I have the later generation, the SMC Takumar 28/3.5 and I consider that an excellent lens.

[@Tele-fk4cu]

Great videos, thanks! My understanding of the red numbers were that these would indicate the best settings for hyperfocal filming.

[@red_code]

Glad it was helpful!

[@d30gaijin]

Great video! Thank you. I finally found my 28mm f/3.5 Super Takumar today after having misplaced it for the last year.🥺 Mine is the second version and is in like new condition in its original leather lens case with neck strap and the original Takumar lens hood in its original leather case attached to the lens case neck strap. Now to get out and use it. Interesting comparison to the Lydth 30/3.5. I have that lens too, except as an old Pentacon version and the new Version II from the modern Meyer Optik Gorlitz folks. I also have a later SMC Pentax-M 28mm f/2.8 in K mount. Guess I need to compare the two Pentax 28mm lenses. Something I have never done for some reason I cannot explain. Again, thank you for this video.

[@red_code]

This is very normal when you have a number of lenses in your shelter. If I wasn't entertained with this channel, I'm absolutely sure that certain lenses will be stored in the oblivion drawer. How many lenses do you use alternately? Most likely half a dozen and the same goes for those who have a wardrobe full of clothes😂. About comparing lenses, I do prefer to compare with different makers. And last, it's my pleasure you have enjoyed my video. Thank you.

[@d30gaijin]

@@red_code So very true. I need to do better. The lenses deserve better.🙃

[@MichaelRusso]

Your video sold me on buying one. Nice lens. I had to unscrew the rear element group out to clean but after that, very nice!

[@red_code]

Thank you for the comment. 🤩

[@RobertOBlivion]

Very informative, well researched and well constructed video. This was very helpful, thank you!

[@red_code]

Thanks for your comment and the pleasure it is mine.

[@MichaelRusso]

Older version and still a performer!

[@ohjajohh]

I recently got this one, it is the latest version(I think) with 43872 on the switch. I didn't try it out yet, but will do so this weekend

[@red_code]

Have fun with it.

[@d30gaijin]

My second version has 43871 on the switch.

[@Ranveer_Singh_Kahani]

Should i buy it tomorrow?

[@red_code]

Thanks for your comment. Just wait a few more days and a new chapter about the Minolta MC W ROKKOR 28mm f/3.5 will be published. I will include comparisons between the two lenses.

[@red_code]

I’m sorry to revoke my previous reply, that lens is gone as a birthday present 🎁. Is sharp and renders good color. Distortion is acceptable. If you are enjoying street photography, I say yes.

[@Ranveer_Singh_Kahani]

​@@red_code Thanks...today i got sigma 50mm 1.4 old model...HSM something

[@red_code]

@@Ranveer_Singh_Kahani have fun 😊

[@Tonellacam]

Interesting I thought the early first version of this lens goes to f22 , looks like you have the second version that goes to f16 , I didn’t realize that your version was also 58mm thread , I thought all the versions that weren’t the first were 49mm thread , I’m looking at a first version tonight so doing some research , it’s 58mm thread and goes to f22 that’s produced from 62-65 , I wonder if it’s not as good as the later versions

[@red_code]

Hello. Reviewing this video of mine, I need to apologise the wrong info. Indeed you are right. The first gen. of SUPER-Takumar don't have a product number, aperture goes until f/22, and filter diameter is 49mm. The second gen. the aperture is until f/16 with a 58mm thread. The central marking of the depth of field scale tricked me in to this as 1st gen. is a "lollipop" marking and the 2nd. gen. a diamond shape. I have my own questions marks. About your last sentence, the number of elements remained the same but arranged in a new improved optical design. Thanks for correcting me and much appreciated.

[@Tonellacam]

@ no worries I just learned it like an hour before watching your video but I did a seri it deep dive into what version I’m going to buy , I didn’t end up getting the f22 version , it was real banged up , but I didn’t end order a f16 version off eBay that looks like it’s in mint condition !!

[@red_code]

@@Tonellacam Hello and Happy New Year. Have fun.

[@Tonellacam]

@@red_code you too my friend !

[@Tonellacam]

Are these radioactive ?

[@red_code]

No, it isn't. Thanks for your comment.

[@ianhand5006]

I have a mint one with its original leather case and hood.

[@red_code]

Love your lens no matter its price or lens performance, it's a legacy.

[@d30gaijin]

Me too... same.