I still dont think I would get it over the Tamron 35-150. That lens still runs the zoom world. you get way more and as a photographer, its the best right now of all zoom lenses
@Giovanni-Giorgio2 ай бұрын
24-70mm may be boring, but i find myself using it all the time. I must admit, this 28-105 f2.8 has my attention.
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
Might be worth renting!
@aefilmsweddings2 ай бұрын
Right there with you. I've got the Tamron 28-75mm and it basically lives on my camera full time, but I do find myself wanting more reach in some scenarios. Typically I just switch to APS-C mode to let the crop factor cheat it, but removing a step would be nice!
@Chris-B.Ай бұрын
I recently purchased the 24-70mm Art II, and as much as the 105 reach is tempting, I do love my wide 24. I am unsure what to do.
@iambrandonscales2 ай бұрын
Since I’ve owned the Sigma 28-45mm f/1.8, I’ve definitely noticed the difference between 24mm and 28mm. However, this new lens is still a solid choice, especially at the price point! Great review 👍
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
Thanks Brandon!
@kernzillaАй бұрын
the 28mm factor you mention here is pretty real. for events, 24mm gets the job done most of the time, but have found since switching to the 28-70, i really need to stay conscious of my position when putting group shots together. (muscle memory is very real in regards to focal lengths!) Overall it's usually not a deal-breaker, but something you def have to acclimate to. nice review here!
@anirbanmukherjee15162 ай бұрын
That 4mm in the wide end, is super important for me. But i must say sigma did a great job on this lens. Maybe i will try it out some day, but a 24 - 70 mm f2.8 will always be my favourite.
@ss_photostudiorcf87352 ай бұрын
Ryt bro
@billem162 ай бұрын
I love my sigma art 24-70 for weddings but I always wish I could zoom tighter during ceremony vows and such. So I may need this. Also the declicked aperture ring would be an awesome feature too. I don’t think I’ll miss the 4mm on the wide end. But all this to say, I doubt I swap my 24-70s for these for a year or so
@DigiDriftZone2 ай бұрын
Amazing lens but losing the 4mm on the wide end hurts, 28 is just a tad too tight in too many situations. Personally I'd rather a 16-35 and 70-200, and just have a gap from 36-70 - as you say these focal lengths look quite plain/boring.
@MrIowahawks773 күн бұрын
Is this a prime lens ?
@DangAlvinFilms2 ай бұрын
Awesome video, thanks Matt!
@wolveswithtea2 ай бұрын
You call it the 24-105 at 1:109 btw! I use the Tamron 35-150 on my main cam and need something similar for my B cam for ceremonies & speeches so this has my attention rn
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
😂 oops
@BensonIbe2 ай бұрын
the only reason I will want to get the 24-105mm f2.8 is about the internal zoom (for gimbal use)
@sambrandner2 ай бұрын
If all the passengers in a train car walk to one side of the car, does the weight distribution change?
@g_lantos2 ай бұрын
Just wait until Tamron comes out with the 28-180 f2.8 🤫
@wolveswithtea21 күн бұрын
I've seen another review saying it doesn't focus when zooming. Can you do a test to confirm this or not? Maybe a short? 👀 It's the ONE thing stopping me from pre-ordering. If I can't do a slow zoom out for aisle shots whilst keeping the couple in focus, its a no for me
@wolveswithtea21 күн бұрын
Review was by Jared Polin for reference at 4:40 into his video review
@g_lantos2 ай бұрын
Also I don't think so it beats the Tamron 35-150 f2.8 in usability. Yes its 990g compare to 1150g which is lighter, but with this Sigma 28-105 you still need a 16-35 or 14-24 lens and also a 70-200 if you wanna have a good range. On the other hand with the Tamron 35-150 you only need a 16-35 and lets not forget with that lens you also get a 35 f2 prime for video work or some environmental portraits.
@LaurenceLee2 ай бұрын
Exactly what I'm thinking.
@frankfeng27012 ай бұрын
When it comes to zooms, Tamron is usually the market leader and Sigma is just a mediocre follower.
@PTSOPHOTOАй бұрын
debating wether to go for this or something wider than a 28 like a 16-35 f4 pz. I currently have a tamron 28-75 f2.8 gen1 and it's okay but I find the sharpness lacking in some instances, with odd color shifts.
@KeenonhangАй бұрын
I’ll stick with my Tamron 35-150 although this lens does look good.
@benjamin.kelley2 ай бұрын
Finally decided to get out of the Canon cripple ecosystem, sold all my Canon glass and bodies, and bought a Sony FX3 and Sigma 24-70 Art mark I since it was less expensive than the mark II. This might be the upgrade in a few months along with a 70-200.
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
This lens and a 70-200 would be great
@benwoodbridge2134Ай бұрын
Matt I filmed a whole wedding on a 70-200mm on my ronin rs4 Pro 2 weeks ago (yes my arms hurt at the end of it). But are you telling me with this my job will be easier in the future??😅😅
@michalbaranovic563418 күн бұрын
i wnat lock button for 35mm/50mm/70mm not only for travel.....
@XxGerberGamerxXАй бұрын
Sigma 24-70 f2.8 or sigma 28-105f2.8 for filmmaking using a gimbal ?
@СтасГрищук-ц7бАй бұрын
The same thought) i think i will buy 28-105. I have 20 mm and i dont like wide focal, 35 is my favourite.
@quiztasiarocks16 күн бұрын
Curious if ppl think 28mm isn’t wide enough
@deanisplemoniАй бұрын
That 4mm on the wide end is a MASSIVE difference, but.... that aperture is tasty.
@fellowcitizenАй бұрын
Thanks!
@pizzomedia7261Ай бұрын
The manual focus is an absolute dealbreaker. Sigma should fix this on e-mount.
@DanielEarl2 ай бұрын
I shoot with the sigma 28-70, so im fine with 28 on the wide end. 👍
@MaxKreiss2 ай бұрын
Hey „My Name is Matt Johnson“…where‘s your Iron 🤭 Great Review, thx an Greetings from Germany my friend 😎🖖🏼
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
Haha thanks Max! Ugh I know I had just grabbed the shirt out of the dryer and realized it was wrinkled about halfway through. Oh well, means more comments I guess
@MRG-Photos328 күн бұрын
Definitely the new 24-70 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
@JoeCopenhaver2 ай бұрын
How is it on a gimbal?
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
Definitely heavier than a prime, but still quite usable on my RS4 Pro. That gimbal handled the lens even zoomed in. :)
@YoSoyMagela2 ай бұрын
@@whoismatt and with the rs3 mini ?
@GoharioFTWАй бұрын
@@YoSoyMagela rs3 mini lmao
@cole4662Ай бұрын
@@whoismattDo you think the regular RS4 (non-pro) would have trouble with balancing it?
@Divergencemedia2 ай бұрын
This or the Tamron 35-150. 🤔
@Divergencemedia2 ай бұрын
I should comment after I finish the video. 😂
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
😂😜
@BillyKumoro-ct7gt27 күн бұрын
@@whoismattcan I use this lens in my canon R6 mark II with adapter ? The Sigma DG HSM type can fit perfectly with adapter but I am not sure with DG DN type, thank you !
@KadeemBooth2 ай бұрын
How is it a review at launch?
@whoismatt2 ай бұрын
Uhhh cause I had it before launch? 😜
@KadeemBooth2 ай бұрын
Overview at best. First impressions, anything.
@frankfeng27012 ай бұрын
When it comes to zooms, Sigma is just a bit behind Tamron.
@Unforsakenn2 ай бұрын
nice need this
@FlorinBlaga2 ай бұрын
You didn't tell us in the presentation if those who have Sony 24-105 f4 deserve to sell it and buy Sigma 28-105 f2.8!!!