THIS MOD MAKES YOU A COOKIE!!

WATCH THE STREAM: / frostprime
The Cookie: steamcommunity...
Sub to the VOD channel: tinyurl.com/3c...
JOIN THE DISCORD: / discord
FOLLOW ON TWITTER: / thefrostprime
JOIN THE REDDIT: / thefrostprime
My editor: / beardbox
#STS #roguelike #frostprime

[@rngsmiles3979]

I appreciate the calling to attention and clearing up any misunderstandings right at the start of the video. Mad respect for keepin it real.

[@bryceschneider4872]

I teach a class at my University about AI in media and I will say that when contained to personal projects or non-profitable works like this, we find that AI art is mostly acceptable. There is very little correlation between these types of fun projects and any sort of negative impact on real artists. To put it another way, this creator would not have commissioned an artist to make this art if AI was not an option, so nobody lost work or commissions. Personally, I think the goofy paint art is more charming than AI art, but I don't mind that this is the route the author took.

[@Necroes]

Personally? I really don't see a good distinction between AI art and any other digital tool for art creation. Both enable a given individual to create their vision while bypassing 'traditional' methods. If anything, AI art programs are just the next logical step in the process. No modern artist is truly original, after all, as all of them take inspiration from somewhere. If anything, this just puts the power of creation into the hands of anyone who cares to want it, while cutting down on the many strenuous hours it would otherwise take to master the craft; The literal intention of all technological innovation from day one. Modern artists complaining about AI generated art is really no different from older generations of artists complaining that digital art isn't "real art."

[@bryceschneider4872]

@@Necroes That's a pretty common and valid stance to have. AI is distinct in that it is being adopted so rapidly that artists don't have as much time to adapt as previous generations. It also is far more threatening to their livelihood than previous advancements. Creatives make up a sizeable amount of the population and there really wouldn't be enough jobs around for them all to take if they lose their livelihoods. Just some things to consider.

[@Thanatos6669]

@@Necroes except ai art straight up commits plagiarism

[@sherrypopper9614]

@@Necroes Idk man. To me, AI art feels more like an act of tracing someone's work rather than being inspired by it.

[@Necroes]

@@bryceschneider4872 Counter-Point: We Also live in a time where our capacity to respond to a rapidly changing environment is greater than ever. Instead of repeating the sins of the past generations and trying to shame people into not using a new tool because people are having a hard time adapting to the way it changes the market, maybe modern artists should learn from the past; Accept that this new tool exists, that it's not going to just magically go away, and focus efforts on coming up with ways to either work with it or work around it. I'll even toss out an idea to start; Work with AI software designers to create AI software that produces artwork in layers in a manner in which artists could interact with them like they were their own art. That way, artists can use AI art as a basis for their own original work, bypassing a lot of the busy work of doing mock-up drawings and major color/texture applications so they can focus more on the fine detail work.

[@danielhavoc889]

I feel like this is exactly what AI art was made and should be used for. One guy who probably can't draw, and probably doesn't have the money to hire an artist, making a goofy mod for zero profit. This is the situation I see AI art as a zero downside option, only improving what the community can produce.

[@murdockcain1894]

To complain about AI art in a free mod, you first need to complain about the 99% of other mods that have just straight up stolen art. Otherwise, you're just a hypocrite.

[@AvangionQ]

Frost, the mod creator did a whole bunch of fixes after watching your playthrough ... please run this back again on ascension 1 💚

[@LuisAlvarez-mm5oh]

to be fair, goofy and half baked /lmao/ drawings give more charm to mods than "complex" art

[@cany0udance]

Is that entirely true? There’s a character mod called The Constrictor that released a year ago which features exclusively hand-drawn art. To this day, the mod only has 660 subscribers, and I honestly feel it’s because people look at the screenshots and determine the art isn’t “good” enough. The mod almost certainly would have done better stats-wise if the art was AI generated.

[@TheLethargicWeirdo985]

@@cany0udance Mods like the rodent and anything Vex makes have ms paint artstyles that are similar but have very large subscriber counts. The rodent has 6081 current subscribers. I don't think that's the problem imo but maybe I'm wrong

[@cany0udance]

@@TheLethargicWeirdo985Not trying to be disrespectful towards the creator of The Constrictor (they also made the Paper Mario redraw mod which is pretty good) but there’s a big difference in the art quality between The Constructor and something like The Adventurer. I believe there is a certain “quality” threshold for hand-drawn art where, at some point, your mod will do better if you just use AI for it. The blanket statement of “hand drawn is more charming than AI” is only sometimes true, is my point.

[@LuisAlvarez-mm5oh]

@@cany0udance i dont know, that one last comment is a stretch for me

[@birthdayzrock1426]

you want half-baked cookies?

[@johnvuchetich142]

I think with AI art the important thing here is that the creator was able to make something they were comfortable with sharing, it could be that making art by had is something that holds up the creation process or something they are not willing to do/ pay to have done. in that regard, the AI allowed for this mod to be public. That being said for larger projects AI cutting out real artists where commissions would have been a possibility is definitely a problem

[@jamesboyack9736]

This is the take I agree with most so thank you for sharing. Because that this is a MOD and not a full game I think the AI is fully justified... and I mean the cards look good too

[@wolfikins2777]

I disagree only because you lose the charm like what Vex did. Like objectively vex doesnt have “good” art but it has their charm to it, i assure you any Vex mod is more memorable than the kinda generic bland corporate look of the AI cookie

[@IamPlate]

i was gonna say the exact same thing actually, i totally agree

[@keldoe1351]

@@wolfikins2777I agree. I much prefer when mods have crappy MS paint art or even just reskins of vanilla card as opposed to using AI art

[@Mr.Fleckstone]

AI Generated content for mods, free to play games or friendly gaming nights? Hell yeah! Disney using it for official commercials and images? NUH UH

[@sandrarohrbach1487]

As "an artist" (whatever that means, you can decide for yourself), i have a pretty strong stance when it comes to AI Art. In my opinion it is very dangerous and there definetly is an ethical question behind it. However, even as someone that is very against AI Art, this is the exact circumstance where i like it being applied. It enables modders to create the best product possible. If you can programm etc, but cant draw, AI Art allows you to still get on a visual level you would like. And its not possible for most people to comission this many card arts. And its not like we dont use tools for other things, outside of art. So aslong the art itself isnt the sellingpoint of the mod, i dont think theres anything wrong with it.

[@simonnikonov2577]

Honestly, the fact that we even need psa in the beggining is kinda weird. Autor of mod did a good job in what counts - making a full package with proper balance, mechanics a flavour. And they used AI exactly for what it is meant to be used for - to do overwhelming amount of work, author isn't good with. Why could someone have a problem with this, is beyond me

[@cany0udance]

AI is a very hot topic not only in general, but especially in the STS modding community. It’s good that Frost is being responsible by being upfront about it.

[@5TailedArtist]

Because AI art steals from actual artists by compiling their art into a "learning program" without their permission. That's why it's bad. Shitty MS paint drawings or, lord help people, commissioning actual artists is better than AI every single time.

[@simonnikonov2577]

@@5TailedArtist I went to gamejams and was in modding communities. What is often called "shitty MSPaint" isn't shitty at all most of the time. Really badly drawn things don't even see the light of the day. Besides, if we look at some popular mods, like "Animator", they haven't exactly asked for premission to use assets either, but somehow, it is more acceptable (because it is non commercial derrivative work, that's why both of this should be equally ok)

[@cany0udance]

@@5TailedArtist”AI steals from actual artists” is a twisted take on “extracts pattern data based on publicly available material”. Also, not everyone has even remotely decent art/photoshop skills or the money to commission an artist.

[@Hiiyapow]

@@5TailedArtist So you think this modder should have commissioned 70+ separate pieces of art? Do you have any idea how much that would cost?

[@tylerslittlecafe1288]

I think AI art is fine for something like this: like you said, its not like someone would have commissioned that much art for a goofy mod, so it isn't taking business away from artists. In fact, I think this is the *ideal* use for AI art: unmonetized, personal projects and stuff like that.

[@BlazingDarkness]

Exactly. The only thing it does in this instance is add some extra layer of quality to the goofy fun that otherwise would've probably been very poorly drawn.

[@AliceIsSleepy]

Honestly, i dont mind the AI art at all, even more so because this is just a silly mod. If it wasnt ai art, it'd either be art they found on the internet randomly or paint art, considering the modder isnt good at drawing. If at no point an artist would ever have been paid for this, why would we give a shit if the modder decided to, instead of going on paint, make it a different way?

[@fishfresh4538]

I want a mod for frost now that has very vague descriptions just to piss him off

[@Eidenhoek]

Does damage. *Upgrade* Does more damage.

[@fishfresh4538]

I love it

[@Eidenhoek]

@@fishfresh4538 *to the player*

[@xeroddqkrlord874]

I mean, this is like what ai art is good for. Letting developers who code and dont do art, add nice art to their projects. It is not like this Modder would have gone to an artist to get art if ai didnt exist. We would have gotten ms paint doodles. It just enhances the game and its perfectly fine

[@gogile7427]

Watched this drunk and depressed af, made me laugh thanks bro.

[@nscottrune]

Hope things get better for you soon, man

[@allisterblossfeld9329]

I love how almost all the comments are about ai generated art and not about the mod itself. Seems like a fun mod, although super broken. Sometimes playing a broken character is fun, even if it is easy.

[@jmaxmage]

I feel this is a sentiment shared by a lot of the commenters, but AI art that is not for profit seems significantly less exploitative especially for projects that would typically not commission artists. The benefit of AI art is widely available functional images and the negatives, from an artist standpoint, is lost revenue and stolen property. This, while there may be stolen property depending on what the AI was fed, is not list revenue and is using AI for functional but not inspired art.

[@officiallyaninja]

Some people are saying "just make ma paint art it's mor charming" are seriously underestimating how much work art takes, even vexes art would take an order of magnitude more time than using AI. Dont undervalue the work amateur artists are doing by calling it bad and pretending you're complimenting them by saying its "charming"

[@Corundrom]

Day 254 of asking Frost for a run of The Evolution

[@Jojoponz]

i do love the use of ai art here because you can tell the art that the modder actually made, and you can tell that having the ai images helped him get the mod sooner while he makes the rest of the art, besides its not like he profits from this

[@Hiiyapow]

Being anti AI art is cringe. Don't get me wrong, I can get not enjoying AI art (as in, it's just not for you), but there's no real arguments presented against it other than "but what if it's used in a way which is illegal for profit" which is an argument that can be applied to literally anything in the universe. You mention it yourself- this person would have literally had to commission like 75 pieces of art or learn how to draw just for a project they wanted to do. It seems insane to me that people seem to think it's reasonable to essentially remove a form of automation to "keep artists jobs" or whatever. Might as well go back to pre-agriculture with that kind of thinking.

[@Lactosecow]

imo, silly free mods are the perfect place for ai art. no one's gonna commission a bunch of cards for this, so no one's losing money.

[@keldoe1351]

I’m so messed up and evil that this is just a balanced character to me

[@Away4Ever]

Nothing wrong with A.I. art at all.

[@pokemonnnerd]

There are quality mods to this game that literally use art from various anime or actual IPs(LEAGUE OF LEGENDS for example) that are great gameplay wise but "steal" art from artists/larger companies. AI generated art for mods that are FREE TO DOWNLOAD are absolutely fine.

[@8n177]

the ethics of using ai for the mod art here are better than what you typically see, considering the mod author is ostensibly not making any money off of it. that said, the art would’ve been much more charming if it was just a shitty first draft ms paint drawing of a cookie for all the cards.

[@animatheo5779]

That's what I feel with cartoony ai art, ms paint would be more charming

[@blightspreadergames1110]

I feel like AI art used for commercial gain and/or used without clear sources listed is pretty bad. However, for a small, fun, FREE mod, I think it's a great use of the resource. The amount of people that dislike AI art, and feel the need to megaphone it is a little disheartening when a lot of people don't have the resources available to make polished, aesthetically pleasing art.

[@BossofSuperStars]

Short of it. Its for a FREE mod. I think it would be silly to pay someone for that quality of art. The discussion is entirely separate if it was something you had to pay for.

[@maxmanchik]

I'm not against AI art. After all, it's just like a second background to the game. It doesn't affect gameplay in any meaningful way besides making it look better

[@Frickenheck]

I mean I don’t really care about the ai art. Like obviously it doesn’t look as nice but it let this mod be created most likely quicker and easier than it would’ve been. Does it hurt anybody?

[@darkpheonix77]

You basically have a sand blaster of crumbs.

[@lordchunderbussiii]

The cookie was pregnant cause someone (pea)nutted inside. Also the fact that it was a peanut and not a milk man... Mr. Peanut better watch his step.

[@mrhankypie7901]

My opinion is I hope there is a green onion expansion, because green onions go on everything

[@Senorgato029]

I feel that using ai art for a purpose like this is fine, maybe put a disclaimer about it somewhere in the mod description or something but it’s better than no art imo

[@gamecavalier3230]

If I had to guess I'd think that "the next few cards played" would be the number of stacks of the buff you have. Still, "few" is definitely not the right word to explain anything in StS.

[@DoomGamer3000]

I CAUGHT A FROST VIDEO WITHIN THE FIRST 10 MINUTES LET'S GO

[@poir7025]

day 460 of asking frost to play chess cookie mod pgo

[@luk4aaaa]

I think that because it's used for apassion project and it's used to do something the creator otherwise cannot do (make good card art) AND the most important part, it's not for monetary gain, I think it's fine. Would be nice if the comissioned an artist ofc, but people don't have that kind of money nowadays.

[@Maalithian]

I have no issue with AI art and have used it myself for a couple of at home projects for myself. If no artist would have gotten paid for it, who cares.

[@Mrinsecure]

I feel like the ethics of AI basically come down to this: Acceptable: Using it for personal reasons, not intended for profit, clearly marked as AI generated. Unacceptable: Using it for business/official purposes, intended for profit, pretending it is actual art made by a real person. Here, I feel like the main issue is the mod creator did not clearly indicate they were using AI art as part of the cards. Otherwise, it's (mostly) harmless.

[@AvengingSyndrome]

Lol, this mod is the perfect example of what makes AI art great. They made a mod so much better with so much less effort. It's a fantastic tool for expressing yourself.

[@meowford7276]

Frost probably didn’t know but tomorrow December 4th is national cookie day in the USA

[@themaddollmaker]

Frost admitting he's a cookie explains why he always looking like a snack! I'll leave now

[@rafaellerescapone]

honestly i would've been very disappointed with frost if he didn't have that disclaimer at the start. considering it, though, i think he handled the issue really well.

[@joelmorrasca9810]

I think AI is totally acceptable here, it’s not for profit and it’s not trying to be passed off as human-made. It’s useful for little passion projects or things like this exactly! A mod made by a person with a vision but maybe little artistic talent or time. They need assistance somehow :) it’s a lot of drawings

[@Titian083]

I like how frost said no one is going to commission 72 drawings for a mod. But is still ridiculously upset that it’s AI art. What is there to be upset about? No one lost out on work, dude was making some goofy mod for a game, and he wasn’t selling it. It’s literally the perfect use for AI art. Hating on the mod creator for using AI art in this scenario is super cringe. Massive -2. I get hating on something without regards to the situation is one of your schticks but this was just dumb. You even pointed out why your objections to AI art didn’t apply here but continued doing it anyway

[@hydrabuster3981]

AI art is perfect for something like this, assuming the mod dev is a solo dev, they've already spent time making a free mod, if they can't draw well this allows them to have something that looks decent without paying someone to make art. I can't draw or 3d model worth a damn and that's what stopped me from pursuing making mods for skyrim/MC, because if I made mods they'd be mostly for me and free for anyone to download if they wanted to. AI vs paying an artist is like the piracy debate, Artists aren't losing money bc small creators are using AI, the creators were never going to commission an artist. To be clear I'm not saying that artists should do free work or lower their prices, Art is a skilled work that takes time, charge your worth and pay your artists please. But between a mod being never made or using AI art, I choose AI art.

[@iyetisnipe]

NO WAY! ANDREW HAS TYPE 1 TOO?! Good editor AND has same condition as me?! ANDREW JUST GOT EVEN COOLER!!!!

[@GizzakOlden]

tl;dr: The idea that bringing something you love to life is wrong because you're either too untalented, don't have the time to dedicate to refining a skill, or are too poor to have someone else make it real for you. That just does not sit well with me. Use for passion, not profit. I'm personally ok with AI art when it's used like this. People that essentially say "If you can't create it yourself, it doesn't deserve to exist" comes across more as gatekeeping expression rather than being protective of artists. If you went into someone's home and saw their desktop background was AI art would you be throwing a fit in their home for something they did for themselves to enjoy personally that no one would ever see? If a college student barely keeping himself fed and trying his hardest at his classes is using AI art to mod a game he loves and just has no artistic talent or time to learn the skill are you going to jump down his throat for bringing something he loves to life? There also seems to be a double standard. I'm willing to bet no one against AI art is going to conventions telling people selling art of characters from popular media that what they are profiting off other creator's IPs. If I pay someone to draw a character that doesn't belong to that artist in an art style of another kind of work of a different artist, for some reason that is fine because someone skillful is doing it. That said, selling AI art, distributing it widely for acclaim, or using it to avoid hiring staff that your company can absolutely afford. That's where the line lands for me. Artist should have those opportunities or at the very least consent to their art being used for that. Hire the artist, or license their library to use with AI if they're up for that. If you release a product for sale with visual assets, there is no excuse for not being able to name the individual who created or contributed to those creations.

[@soos808.]

Imagine getting time lord with this run

[@abyssshriek7631]

AI generated art for a silly modded character's cards is fine. Nobody is trying to take credit for their artwork via a STS mod. But also I like really bad Microsoft paint card art as well. Both are good

[@Le77eTouriste]

personaly, I don't care if it's AI generated art. It's f2p, why would he commissioned someone and pay it for smth he doesn't win money off? and wouldn't it be more fair to get someone to draw the arts of the cards and not pay him?

[@ThylineTheGay]

Meh, while compared to other shit people are using 'ai' for, it's not really harmful, just like why? I'm sure there are even places made for art requests if doing it yourself is something you're not comfortable with

[@coltonhodges2332]

The Art I feel is okay if it’s like one or two creators who arnt Great at Making Art like that but if it came down too showing skill or a Multi person team working on the mod I feel shouldn’t use “AI Generated” Art

[@jojo1isawesome]

😂 AI will replace most artists. That's just how it works. Not much you can do about it. I don't get why this debate needs to exist

[@perfectimperfections5354]

Have not watched the video yet, but I will be very disappointed if he does not scream “I’m crumbing” at least one time.

[@yumithehunter6292]

I’m gonna be honest with you…. I don’t fucking care if it’s ai, who else will make the art?

[@TheOrnitie]

Day 489 of coming from Twitch just to drop a like and a comment for my boy Andrew. Missed these funny mods

[@SaneGhoul]

Little disappointed he didn't end with "And that's how the cookie crumbles!"

[@Wither-xj5cp]

I could not give 2 shits about ai being used in this way, it kinda takes away part of the charm because the art is pretty good but its just a goofy mod and they didnt want to spend extra time making 75 drawings + relic art and other special card art

[@Grimm-A]

Unironically really apreacite the callout about it being ia, will watch the video but this instantly took me away for ever triying the mod, again, nice callout out

[@dylangrizzle]

AI art is fine in mods, not everyone has the time or money to commission an artist or do it themselves. Now AI art in a game that I pay for is inexcusable. Also AI art in ads is cringe too.

[@rickdaniel7341]

now that’s a twist ending

[@blackiscolor7732]

the arguments against/for ai art are completely invalid, if you dont agree dont support it, if you do agree do, simple easy .

[@benjaminzaugg1127]

seems like something AI art is made for. Cheap little art that looks better than random paint.exe pictures but don't cost an arm and a leg to create.

[@insomniacnerd5592]

Another character that would’ve gone absolutely stupid with shuriken.

[@Shadow.Darkraven]

I don't generally care about AI art unless the person using it was dishonest and lied about using it but at least this person was upfront about it

[@Shadow.Darkraven]

I don't generally care about AI art unless the person using it was dishonest and lied about using it but at least this person was upfront about it

[@andreazampollo6726]

Why argue about Ai generated pics while some mods copy paste some mtg artworks?

[@rngsmiles3979]

These kind of decks are my favorite, but when you got a deck that can play a thousand things a turn I just dread seeing what the act 3 boss is. If that is time eater I get sad.

[@QiyanuReeves_]

I've been there a lot of times, where you just need you set up your infinite and die to Time Eater because u either block or do your set up

[@o.l.g.gaetan544]

i think that despite everything this is probably going to be the future of mods.

[@Feraligatrfjhgujvgh]

Its a mod, it wasn't gonna commission art from any artist in the first place, so I say it gets a pass.

[@Thanatos6669]

considering steam's stance on ai art doubt this mod will be up for long

[@tomthecasual5337]

my opinion: AI art for personal use or free mods -> fine AI art for commecial use -> not fine

[@missingno_fgc]

I have some concerns about AI, but my concerns are moreso concerns with capitalism than with the technology itself. I don't think there's anything wrong with using it for a small personal project like this. I'd even go as far as to say people directing blanket anger at the technology are pointing it at the wrong place.

[@KurooTheEditor]

I mean it’s a mod who cares if it’s ai generated we are here for funny sts gameplay

[@kalesandrancor]

Just to chime in with a completely random opinion but I love AI art in it's ability to make high quality artwork that fits whatever you're looking for accessible. I get that creating art is a talent, skill, and people want to be paid for their skills, but, technology, eventually will make all our talents useless, as it has across many things already. Nobody laments modern refrigerators removing the need for neighborhood milk and ice delivery men, people rejoiced at personal computers getting sophisticated enough for people to produce and share their own music, though that eliminated a lot of very specific technical jobs as well. Technology will keep progressing, the answer isn't to put arbitrary limits on it based on one's personal pet favorite skill that it might be integrating at the moment, it's figuring out a way to have universal basic income and housing, and protecting anyone that might not be able to make a living.

[@viktordyrby7804]

Hmm, one chip damage+ goes infinite by itself

[@Cantthinkofaname-dm2ko]

Literally saved by blood via at the end there

[@anthonyp3452]

Peglin poglin but with cookies?

[@KodyackCasual]

I find AI art completely acceptable when otherwise the project would not have purchased art; for example non-profit projects like this. The real issue is when they are used in licensed projects that are sold for money. That should rightfully have commissioned artists doing specific work as it's a commercial product.

[@dracospikex2678]

The way I see AI art is that in this scenario they just used the art to ENHANCE the experience because they simply COULD NOT make their own art of decent quality. Art is all about expression and them making the AI art for this goofy cookie mod and making sure the art fits the character I'd say makes it fine. Though I generally don't like AI art, that's just because people compare it to human made art, and act like it has the same value but when someone is just using it as a placeholder to enhance something they personally made I have no issue.

[@IamWerthy]

I don't see anything wrong with this sort of application of AI art. The mod creator's "art form" isn't creating cute images. It's curating a fun gameplay experience for someone. In my mind this application is the same thing as using an Amazon server to host a website that you might sell your knitted sweaters on. You don't have the means to host your own website. You have the means to knit. So you need a giant giga corporation, or in this case a massive algorithm (essentially the same thing), to do part of it for you so your talent can shine. Also poggy run.

[@Shepard--Tauren]

hi

[@shahrooz3310]

Others have already said but let's boost engagement. Yeah like that you mentioned it was AI art as it does matter to people. Personally I see AI art having a very particular place and this..yeah it one of them. If you're making a free mod for a game then I think AI art is fine - you're not selling anything or trying to make a profit. Context is important

[@Yourhatedquestion]

To throw my hat into the ring: The mod creator was open about it being AI art, won't make much (if any) money from the mod and "the product" isn't the art. It's hard to hate on the use of AI art in this case or find a really good reason against it, except being conceptual against it.

[@0_Body]

Did you feel crummy by the end of this?

[@ethanlarge3572]

Knead damage gets out of hand FAST.

[@meatfreshmeet2784]

I def think the art isn’t amazing to have AI, but I mean yea it’s a mod and it’s supposed to be fun right? I don’t know enough to really add to much 😅

[@deflonko]

peglin-poglin

[@tylordaniel5135]

Who cares if it’s AI art like really

[@MuteSpectre]

i feel like AI art is acceptable (although still not desirable) in this context just cause like. the alternative is mspaint or art taken from elsewhere

[@cocothecocobo1860]

I’m not a fan of ai art, but also it makes this type of thing so much more accessible so… idk it’s sts not an art museum, the creator didn’t claim it was anything else.

[@thereasonabletroll68]

I’m ok with it being AI art It’s not taking a job from an artist and it’s not selling anything so it’s only for fun

[@connorbozynski1006]

My thing is that since this person isn't making any money from the ai art, then its fine. Another banger video from Frost and Andrew

[@Eidenhoek]

*installs all the mods* *Prismatic shard*

[@valen_1892]

When an other Andrew intro where he eats a ia generated cookie and dies from it's sugarfull punch ?

[@chester1882]

I’m kinda more lenient towards AI if it’s for a single person’s mod for a game they really like

[@lancesmites346]

I just saw your Slay the Spire arm tattoo thats AMAZING. I love it!

[@Ingus-Bingus]

Dude, imagine ornamental fan