This NEW Airbus is BIG PROBLEM for Boeing! Here's Why...

Рет қаралды 16,508

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 50

@cellevangiel5973 7 ай бұрын

Airbus is not the Boeing problem. Boeing is it's own problem so don't blame the competition. They were the first in the race, but stumbled over their own feet.

@georgeszurbach444 7 ай бұрын

Didn't realize Boeing was still considered an Airbus competitor.Which Boeing planes actually competes with the Airbus line up?

@user-yt198 7 ай бұрын

Airbus has much more experience in composite materials than Boeing. Way back in the beginning of '70s, Airbus was using composite materials in their aircraft, i.e. A300. Airbus was indeed reluctant to develop A350, because they are always terrible to read the market. For example: A380 was an engineering success, but a financial flop. Not the same company, but the same people developed an engineering marvel, Concorde, but it was a commercial failure as well. There are other examples like lack of an A350-800, but you get the point.

@FLIGAVIA 7 ай бұрын

thanks for your feedback!

@GThu1 7 ай бұрын

But they were spot on with the A300, A320, A320neo and I would count the A220 as well (and the A220-500 may be a positive suprise in the future). Boeing is just run after those aircrafts, especially after A300 and A320neo. So with these, I wouldn't say they are terrible. Boeing had lot of successes in their long history, but they had spectatular failures, like the 7007, 747SP, 7J7, the result of the missed 7J7: 737MAX, probably the 727 as well.

@user-yt198 7 ай бұрын

@@GThu1 I think you need some aviation history lesson. And that is not too far history. - A300 was struggling to sell at the beginning. 1974 Oil Crisis saved it. - In 2008 two engine manufacturers, CFM and P&W separately announced their revolutionary engines. The new engines would be 15-20% more fuel efficient than existing ones. A320 sales were behind 737 sales at that time. So you expect Airbus to adapt those engines immediately to catch Boeing, right? Wrong! Airbus waited TWO AND A HALF YEARS until the end of 2010 when Bombardier C Series (now A220) which was using the new P&W engine started to threaten their market share and only then A320Neo was born. - A220 was presented to Airbus in golden tray for just $1! And that is Canadian dollar! - A350 was developed only after customers declared that they would not buy the "new" aircraft based on A300/330/340 fuselage. So don't tell me Airbus is good in reading the market. Airbus is doing very well now, because Boeing has been even worse than Airbus in the last 25 years.

@GThu1 7 ай бұрын

@@user-yt198 @hakanevin8545 A300: My statment may still be true, even if an oil crisis made it successful. Success depends on external factors as well. Don't you think they were made the first twin-engine, wide-body aircraft with fuel-economy in mind? Boeing followed. Because of the crisis. The A320neo: they still adapted the engine 5 years before Boeing did. In contrast to Boeing, they did it by recognising it's importance and demand, not because a major airline threaten them. Also, they had far better fitting aircraft for it. Boeing forced to follow. A220: As far as I know, Boeing had opportunity, even before Airbus. Even for $1, it was a huge risk (the price wasn't a typo). Looking back from now, everything looks different of course. A350: I didn't mention this type, but the implementation is not much to do with determining the right demand. They did the right thing and built a new aircraft. Boeing followed, and was far slower. About the conclusion: yes your statement is true, but failong is the norm in this industry, so staying afloat is a feat actually. Airbus got the prize. Will Boeing follow?

@mmb811 7 ай бұрын

6:38 not to mention Boeing's ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM inherent issues of putting PROFIT$ OVER SAFETY, which seems not to be changing anytime soon

@terencereeder9830 7 ай бұрын

Make your mind up ,another video you were saying the A350 was virtually finished ?

@zEpiiCJeeDoxD 7 ай бұрын

great video! could you provide the source for saudia's potential deal to buy the Airbus A350s?

@FLIGAVIA 7 ай бұрын

sorry I can't post the link but you can find some from Reuters

@cellevangiel5973 7 ай бұрын

The carbon - aluminium body panels are a Fokker NL product who make them in size and shape. And that was developed for the A380 so they had the knowledge and technology.

@joshuafergusonrc7939 7 ай бұрын

It be worse for Boeing if or when Airbus develops A350 neo!

@nickolliver3021 7 ай бұрын

they wont get an a350neo

@user-yt198 7 ай бұрын

Not Neo, but probably it will be A350 Ultra, if RR can develop their UltraFan. We can also see an A350-2000 then.

@artrandy 7 ай бұрын

@@nickolliver3021 You must have heard that RR are upgrading all the Trents, it doesn't matter what its called......

@nickolliver3021 7 ай бұрын

@@artrandy they only have the ultra fan. Upgrading the trents doesn't mean there will be a neo of the a350

@artrandy 7 ай бұрын

@@nickolliver3021 As I said bro, it doesn't matter what its called. Im not going to argue over semantics......

@tomdavis8757 7 ай бұрын

Actually Boeings woes aren’t helping Airbus like people think. Most model Airbus planes have long backlogs and deliveries are years. People like to say airlines should just switch to Airbus from Boeing but it’s not that simple

@motialvim 7 ай бұрын

B 787 have a completely target market than A 350, as you showed the difference of maximum number of passengers.

@mmb811 7 ай бұрын

Great Informative video

@FLIGAVIA 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for your support!

@icare7151 7 ай бұрын

Very well stated and presented. Thank you for your great videos!

@FLIGAVIA 7 ай бұрын

thank you!

@thetransportdude7408 7 ай бұрын

u deserved my sub from this video

@FLIGAVIA 7 ай бұрын

Thanks so much for your support!

@goldmembership9063 7 ай бұрын

Qatar is one name that I hear always get mispronounced 😂

@eduardodaquiljr9637 7 ай бұрын

How many A350 1000 sold compare to 777?

@AlfCalson 7 ай бұрын

✈️

@jonathanchau5087 7 ай бұрын

I hope Boeing goes under and that the people on the line do regular American style work, basically not give a shit and do things half ass like I did when I worked a line. Remember Boeing workers you never got anything so do Homer Simpson style work

@nickolliver3021 7 ай бұрын

They will never go under

@jonathanchau5087 7 ай бұрын

Well I can help it make it worse and apply for a job on the line and do my typical has ass work

@raymondmifsud4690 7 ай бұрын

The only link i could find from rueters was that of October'22, always if I am correct. If so, i believe this article was supersided by Saudia/Riyadh air ordering the B787 Instead, again subject to my understanding, and could be very wrong. 10Q.