Three scary asteroids that you haven't heard of, and NASA isn't talking about!

NASA insists that asteroids present no threat to Earth for at least a hundred years. But this just isn't true.
Here's three dangerous asteroids that could really ruin your day!
#space #nasa #esa
Please support my channel!
DISCORD MEMBERSHIP, EXCLUSIVE CONTENT AND EARLY RELEASES PLUS 15% OFF MERCH!
/ angryastronaut
www.paypal.com/paypalme/Angry...
Follow me on twitter:
/ astro_angry

[@hakology]

nasa isnt talking about a lot of stuff they should be.

[@FMDD168]

Like Alien UFOs.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@FMDD168 But the only source you can find out about any of this stuff is NASA, ESA, the International Astronomical Union. They ALL talk about these asteroids and they're all in agreement. They don't say these three asteroids are "scary." What is the purpose of trying to destroy the credibility of the only sources of information. If you succeed you won't have anything to talk about.

[@Codysdab]

Why are they not talking about brine shrimp? I need to know!

[@craigmackay4909]

Never A Straight Answer.

[@WillofNewZealand]

Nasa giving a million dollars to beehex, who does not own the 3d print pizza license? Not Nasa nor beehex. tek designers and thing owners perfer not to assist pirates. Time is moving forward with them in breach each day. For us here nasa needs to rebuild its reputation. Each day history records the progress or lack of it. Public records also show everyone who is respecting us, the rules, laws, honorable. Our opinions are nasa needs our help to get its reputation back on track. Then help me sort this. Each day or week it's ignored is another week of no support from those who think integrity honesty honor the law is worth upholding. I'm going to stay on this because the future could be better if I give a dam to try. Are we leaving nasa and stopping tek flow if possible because they are not worthy of our support, so we can take what we can to anyone else? Or perfer nasa on track? I could vote leave this issue and silently drop support and offer tek to others exclusively. Leaving history to record the events. Or say hay man do it right now and it's small, time don't add less scale in this case does it. I say, so I've said. Where are you at on this Mr Angry? Public? Should I quietly go away and the results shall grow, and others get support not nasa, any tek and breach clauses can be added easy enough? Or I should stay and get this sorted, also by public wanting nasas reputation and cudos of having stepped up all heroic like? My opinions. What say you?

[@Violence0vAction]

DART on Standby 24/7 - yes - should be prioritized by govs globally

[@kylegoldston]

We need a " capture and study " plan in place. A Sail Loft could probably make a 100 meter net out of advanced materials to decelerate and capture smaller objects in a high or elliptical orbit. We might get lucky.

[@SuperVictoralex]

I watch other channels for the whimsical part of my brains entertainment but I watch Angry for the concise, well researched and factual information my brain needs. My brain thanks you and Stay Angry.

[@TheAngryAstronaut]

Thanks so much for your kind words! It means a lot to me. :)

[@user-kl5rs1yk3k]

Good piece, thank you!

[@mikehipperson]

Why didn't you center the blast zone on Milton Keynes? It would do £15 worth of damage and destroy some concrete cows!

[@peterlyall6789]

lol 🐄🐄🤣🤣

[@VainerCactus0]

Come on, it's gotta be at least £20 with inflation!

[@dontclickthechannel7949]

It would be nice to have our taxes be put towards items such as asteroids and have legitimate representation. Unfortunately, its being illegally put in the pockets of war mongers and the vast corrupt network of psychopaths.

[@karkatshipper8383]

Very well said.

[@BoycottChinaa]

Lockheed likely has a deflection plan in place and price tag already determined

[@playedout148]

Trump has promised to "rebuild the military" supports a one state solution and is in favor of Russia attacking other countries. Things will never change.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Without a capable defense, there IS NO economy. There is no science. There is no freedom. The aggressors set the rules of engagement. Our only choice is to make it clear if they use that aggression against us it is the last aggression they will ever make. Anything else is surrender of those things you think need ALL of our money. You are hopelessly naïve. That's okay. We need to be reminded of other priorities than defense.

[@barthennin6088]

Space based solar energy!!...can;t wait!!

[@antonnym214]

Thank you for reporting on this! It should be mainstream news, because there are more that we do NOT know about. Well done on your recent trip to the Colorado conference and this new one!

[@johndoepker7126]

I absolutely love Jordan's stories... and his style of reporting.....its....just.....so right to the point !!!

[@SamtheIrishexan]

You look sharp in this video!

[@gregsteele806]

I'd be more worried about an asteroid that survives long enough to make a water impact. The tidal damage from such a hit would dwarf any land based casualty figures.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

Only at first. A land impact will raise a lot of dust very high into the atmosphere. Creating a global winter for some years.

[@rock3786]

I would worry more about a nuke being launched than an asteroid hitting the way things are at the moment.

[@myyklmax]

Think of what happened to Hiroshima when the atomic bomb [Fat Man] exploded 600 meters above the town of Hiroshima. Over 300k persons died from the concussion blast, the firestorm, or from the radiation fallout. Image this happening somewhere else in the US, or in the world, without any early warning?

[@fkxfkx]

Bring it.

[@VideoconferencingUSA]

Nice job

[@venturefanatic9262]

Yeah I'm hoping I age out before the inevitable.

[@scottwilliams5642]

I will be driving on those expected days, harder to hit a moving object !

[@SamtheIrishexan]

These sound like good candidates for dart missions. Even if not planet killers the more we practice that method on the different rocks the better since we know little about whats inside them

[@2150dalek]

I agree with previous post. If we could cease the endless military industrial complex wars and focus our resources as a joint effort, then eliminating an asteroid strike would be such a noble effort.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Over 3.5 billion years all the objects in our solar system have settled into harmonic orbits guaranteeing a minimum of collisions between consequential objects. Now lets declare peace on our little rock and devote all our brainpower, finances and abilities into diverting these objects to some new orbital path. The consequences of that would be to undo 3.5 billion years of solar system evolution and replace it with defective ideas that we think are better. The result would be not just one, but many collisions of Earth and planet killer asteroids. We'd better stick with our wars. They're magnitudes less harmful.

[@ClumzorZ]

Are there any plans to land anything on Apophis?

[@alphazero6571]

i think there is

[@mrtomsaa]

You can't make videos like this and not mention what is calculated chance of these asteroids hiting Earth when they have the close pass by!

[@studleydewrite2942]

Very few sources mention the certainty of the earth being,as has happened before,pounded by the Taurid meteor stream - nothing can prevent it.

[@RockinRobbins13]

No, but NASA, who "isn't talking" about it has. According to NASA's Center for Near Earth Object studies website, odds are: Asteroid 2005 QK76 a 1/14,074 chance of collision. Asteroid 2008 JL3 1/12,000. Asteroid Asteroid 2022 PX1 1/312,500. None of those odds are worth a deceptive video. AA can't mention the odds because that would expose the fact that this video is ridiculous tomfoolery.

[@mrtomsaa]

@@studleydewrite2942 we go trough it every year, there are plenty sources about it.

[@SamtheIrishexan]

​@@studleydewrite2942100% and we are due for it again soon. Something causes ice ages and ends them rapidly on fairly regular schedules.

[@bmobert]

Not only are these objects and others like them a threat, but Omuamua showed us we need to pay attention to interstellar objects as well. The moment we could find interstellar strikes, we found out we'd already been hit... repeatedly. An interstellar strike has is far more energy: its going at interstellar speeds. To my mind, astroid protection is by far the beat arguement for an Orion-style spacecraft. A fleet of them, really, and an international crew to man them. I understand the arguements against an Earth Guard. But, frankly, we need one. And the process of creating and maintaining such an entitiy would dig us out of our.current economic hole, to boot.

[@belliott538]

Apophis may pass close enough to Earth for my Mother In-law to land her Broom upon it’s surface.

[@Yezpahr]

The Tsar Bomba fizzled. Most simulators don't have the option to use the expected maximum yield of that bomb. If it blew up with full power it would be up to 6x bigger than what that explosion was. It (theoretically) could have made a fireball so big that the created vacuum bubble would collapse on different locations creating multiple mushroom clouds or the equivalent of a witches circle for mushroom clouds.

[@jamesgibson3582]

Never heard of that one before!

[@PistonAvatarGuy]

Its yield was purposely reduced in order to protect the carrier aircraft.

[@Yezpahr]

@@PistonAvatarGuy Ah, that's a piece of the puzzle I never heard, but sounds very likely. Something worth noting is that I called it "fizzled", but that wasn't the original term I heard, although it was definitely the term I interpreted it as. The term I heard more closely resembles your description, "reduced" rather than "fizzled". I first heard of it in Dutch and later English renditions I basically kept interpreting as "fizzled"... Oops :P.

[@PistonAvatarGuy]

@@Yezpahr Ah, interesting. But, yes, the yield was intentionally limited.

[@BoycottChinaa]

Danku val

[@moontan91]

it has been decided years ago that the public would not be noticed if there was an asteroid on a collision course.

[@RockinRobbins13]

That's a ridiculous fabrication. Visit the CNEOS impact risk web page. Read about these and hundreds of other asteroids equally unlikely to strike Earth. Read that the odds of these three asteroids striking Earth are 1/12,000, 1/14,048 and 1/312,500. Read that it certainly wasn't _"decided years ago that the public would not be noticed if there was an asteroid on a collision course" and that you just told a complete untruth. Thanks for participating and allowing me the opportunity to reveal the truth. *Liars conceal. Truth tellers reveal.* I'm a truth teller. I invite you to join our clan.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

And it has been decided decades ago to constantly lower fundings of space exploration. That is why these non existent UFOs are hostile; they are undermining the decissions made by congress.

[@RockinRobbins13]

I call for evidence! Who decided it? When? What records indicate that any such decision was ever made? Why have you made such a delusionary and irresponsible statement?

[@megret1808]

You used NYC. Perfect choice

[@playedout148]

It's a great town. Houston would be a better choice.

[@banielsen]

What would happen if a "planet killer" size asteroid were to hit the moon? Could it affect the moon's orbit?

[@RockinRobbins13]

What if all the oxygen in our atmosphere suddenly changed to sodium? It's just as likely.

[@marimuthu14]

Wow

[@jonowack]

what would it take to capture them in orbit?

[@97BuckeyeGuy]

OMG! WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!! THE ANGRY ASTRONOMER HAS SPOKEN!!! Your Fear Porn is off the charts with this one, Jordan. Do better.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

Well NASA isn't actually who to expect to have an emergency rocket availlable at any time. That was over when they announced the SpaceShuttle program. That was the first deathblow to US human space flight, as no human should be send up there if there is no resque rocket on the next pad. SpaceX have never mentioned this issue. I only hope that they can send a resque Dragon within three hours, whenever needed. Apollo still had that feature. An instant DART mission is a task for SpaceForce, and not for NASA. They need to make a special DART contract between SpaceForce and SpaceX.

[@VRtechman]

HRC: Any sort of Catastrophic event is THE BEST way to nudge the public in the direction we want them to go! 🤨 Bug based food's = All out Cattle Forced Sterilisation = Not enough Resources They have a long list of proposals. 🥵

[@retireeelectronics2649]

2022 PX1 maybe rename it Gorzilla to get peoples attention.

[@JFJ12]

Angry wants me dead or what? I live in Antwerp, dammed 😳😱😤

[@greggweber9967]

Bigger than Czar Bomba means energy going out into space with satellites, although they must be close to be harmed. There's a temporary limit to how big an explosion can be. Beyond that point, the next effect will be seismic spreading destruction.

[@scottnorin6633]

Uhhh… the only asteroids NASA doesn’t want to talk about are those that landed on Earth and originated from Mars. 👾

[@johndoepker7126]

Wat we don't know.... won't hurt us.....until it does.......

[@kyles310]

What do we have to do to get one of these guys on the ballot?

[@RockinRobbins13]

One of the asteroids? They'd get MY vote!

[@lestercole1684]

As long as it's NYC; that's good for me.

[@quitequiet5281]

Thanks for the honesty!

[@97BuckeyeGuy]

"Honesty" 😂

[@executivesteps]

The guy is full of it. Maybe he should try getting a real day job.

[@markfinch2016]

Asteroid bumper cars

[@therange4033]

Don't look up!

[@volcommermaid12]

I don't understand why NATO would start a war if Antwerp got hit ?

[@EarlHare]

How about running some numbers on the likelihood of these asteroids absolutely nailing a city centre? With that perspective how much does it actually serve the public to constantly fearmonger about potential collisions when there is absolutely nothing any of them could do about it anyway. Better to track these objects, measure them ever more precisely, notify the authorities and keep coming up with and testing solutions for defending the Earth, precisely what NASA have been doing.

[@RockinRobbins13]

NASA has run the odds of these three asteroids hitting Earth at all. For the first asteroid, the odds are 1/12,000. For the second on hitting the earth at all in all of its six future approaches it's 1/14,084. And for the last and ominously larger asteroid the odds of striking Earth at all are 1/312,500. I think you had best just not sleep until the danger has passed because this is SEVERE danger. /s Hey, let's run the silly collision simulation on an impact between Earth and Saturn. That's worth losing some sleep over. Or not.

[@mikeharrington5593]

Such asteroids could be perturbed on their orbit of the sun thus increasing the possibility of an Impact on Earth. Likewise such asteroids could also perturb other asteroids putting those on an orbit directed at Earth. Not likely, but certainly not impossible.

[@scottymoondogjakubin4766]

Thats just earth gaining weight to the tune of about 43 tons a day !

[@AngryManSki]

What happens if one hits an active volcano or fault line?

[@RockinRobbins13]

According to NASA's Center for Near Earth Object studies website, odds are: Asteroid 2005 QK76 a 1/14,074 chance of collision. Asteroid 2008 JL3 1/12,000. Asteroid Asteroid 2022 PX1 1/312,500. None of those odds are worth a deceptive video. AA can't mention the odds because that would expose the fact that this video is ridiculous tomfoolery.

[@laxplayer99]

due to the pole shift, the magnetic field is going to be extremely weak around 2040. Most likely will have bigger worries than a possible meteor then.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Magnet pole shift has happened many times before without dire consequences. None of the documented great extinction events have been associated with magnetic pole shifts.

[@CrimsonTemplar2]

I’m still aggravated about that report you covered that said space based solar power is infeasible.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

Never mind. ESA will do it. Its only a matter of time ....

[@craigmackay4909]

Apophis 2029 👌🏻

[@ericblanchard5873]

Just 1 person dead from an asteroid impact is unacceptable

[@DeanIllinger]

Ridiculous... are YOU going to pay for a trillion dollar planetary defense system to save the ONE LIFE ... when thousands die weekly in automobile accidents? Of course not ... like too many you want someone else to spend mountains of money, stolen by governments from future generations, just to make YOUR life infintesimally safer. Easier if we just take away your car keys.

[@RockinRobbins13]

We have no more choice not to accept death from asteroid than we have not to accept the 50,000 deaths from the flu each year. We accept much worse dangers than that because the alternative is death.

[@211212112]

What's to stop some rich genius from going all Moonraker, having a small satellite launched under false pretenses, then approaching Apophis, and gravity tractor'n that b*tch right into Cornwall?

[@megret1808]

Don’t Look Up

[@Mrbfgray]

Current condition of NYC would see an improvement with such an event.

[@GreyDeathVaccine]

That's dark.

[@NicholasNerios]

Definitely would be horrible to face any of these scenarios. But, on the bright side, the amount of dust these would blast into the atmosphere could potentially cool the planet a degree celcius hopefully more. The effects would last decades maybe even a few hundred years. So would it really be that bad a thing if we say... let it hit...?

[@bb5979]

Earth has no meaning without humanity

[@teatimetim]

It’s a good click bait video, but a lot of misinformation. For example NASA doesn’t say there no possibility of being hit by these asteroids. Rather the likelyhood is extremely low.

[@TheSouthernorycle]

I really don’t see it as click bait. Not given the outlandish clickbait you see nowadays. NASA is definitely down playing the likelihood of an impact. My brother works at NASA in Virginia and holds that same opinion. It’s easy to forget that he does these videos to be informative and entertaining and if you don’t keep that in mind then every decent title he could come up with will sound like click bait. That’s my 2 coppers worth anyway.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@TheSouthernorycle The odds: 2008 JL3 = 1/12,000. 2005 QK76 = 1/14,084. 2022 PX1 = 1/312,500. To make a video scaring people about any of these three asteroids striking Earth is strictly dishonest abuse of trust. You can randomly pick any three Apollo asteroids and have similar odds. AA is preying on our collective ignorance.

[@jokerace8227]

With the unknowns about minor perturbations, as well as the Solar Wind having a minor, yet dynamic unpredictable effect on their orbits, can't be too sure about exactly where they will be in the future. (ツ) ☕☕(ツ)

[@RockinRobbins13]

Angry Astronaut: _"NASA isn't talking about!!!"_ International Business Times, April 18. Headline: *NASA Predicts Almost 30 Potential Earth Impacts For Approaching Asteroid* Part of the story, which you can look up, of course. None of what I say here is my opinion. _"Both the ESA and NASA noted that the asteroid’s first potential Earth impact might take place on May 1, 2027. The agencies stated that 2008 JL3’s chances of hitting Earth on this date are about one out of 12,000. According to the agencies, the asteroid could collide with Earth at a speed of over 31,000 miles per hour. However, since the asteroid is only around 98 feet wide, there’s a strong chance that it won’t reach the ground. Instead, the asteroid will most likely burn up in the atmosphere and explode mid-air."_ So the claim that NASA isn't talking about it is.......what? What is to be gained by deceiving visitors to your channel with claim after claim after claim that turn out to simply not be true? Every time I check out a research paper cited on Angry Astronaut, every time I reference the Near Earth Objects Study organization to backcheck your claims I find that you have not told the truth. And I give the evidence. Now I'm going to check out the other two. Any bets on whether they turn out the same way? There's actually a 1/12,000 chance that 2008 JL3 might impact Earth. That's not something to lose sleep over. I'll be back about the other two.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Let's visit the CNEOS (Center for Near Earth Object Studies) website Earth impact risk summary table calculating the odds of Earth impact for Asteroid 2005 QK76. The cumulative risk, that is the risk of collision from all of the six close encounters to come is 7.1e-5, that's .000071. That's a 1/14,084 chance that any of those approaches will strike Earth. We might as well worry about the Moon crashing into Earth and run the silly little graphical calculator on that. The conspiratorial mindset here, implying, no flat out stating that NASA is not telling you the truth is plain silly. It's wrong. It's dangerous. It's a disservice to the human race. The sky is not falling. What you are doing is seeking to destroy society's trust in the experts who keep us safe and enable us to understand the universe in which we live. We're two falsehoods out of three claims. On to the next asteroid: 2022 PX1. Any bets on what truth I'll find? I'll be back.

[@RockinRobbins13]

We are back at NASA's CNEOS website to see if NASA _"Isn't talking about!" Asteroid 2022 PX1. Of course the answer that you know by now is that not only is NASA talking about it, but they are the ONLY SOURCE OF INFORMATION. Get this. NASA tells you about this but you shouldn't trust NASA because.....reasons. Is that silly or what? So let's consult the impact risk summary table. This asteroid has only one approach close to Earth and it has a 3.23e-6, .00000323 chance, that's 1/309,598 chance of impact with Earth, functionally about the same odds as Saturn impacting Earth. Plug the mass of Saturn into the nifty collision simulator, will you? KABOOM! Wow, that's impressive. Please realize these asteroids have been flying around the Sun for at least the lifetime of Earth itself, 3.8 billion years, give or take a few hundred thousand years. The way things work in a stable system is objects tend to guide each other into harmonic orbits that guarantee no collision can take place. For instance, Pluto crosses the orbit of Neptune, but the 3/2 harmonic of their orbits mean they can never meet. The International Astronomical Union, the European Space Agency, NASA, the Center for Near Earth Object Studies. These are the real sources of information about the solar system. When Angry Astronaut makes a crazy claim, go there. Do a Perplexity.ai search of academic papers so you can satisfy yourself Angry Astronaut cited them wrongly. The truth is out there. It's easy to find. It isn't found on the Angry Astronaut KZbin channel and that makes me ANGRY ABOUT SPACE.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Placeholder for my deleted spiel on 2022 PX1. NASA DID talk about it and has the odds of any collision at more than 21 times less than either of the other two, on the range of 1/300,000+ of a collision on the one future pass. Again, Angry Astronaut told a falsehood and you fell for it. Evidence to follow after I rewrite the evidence.

[@RockinRobbins13]

Now let’s visit the CNEOS risk of collision page for asteroid 2022 PX1. No it isn’t the 1/12,000 chance of 2008 JL3. It isn’t the 1/14,084 chance of 2005 QK76, No, this one is MUCH less likely, The CNEOS NASA sentry website says that the odds of our third asteroid, 2022 PX1 striking Earth in the single close pass that it will be more than 22 times less likely than either of them at 3.2e-6, that’s .0000032 or a 1/312,500! That’s what all these crazy impact simulations are about! So the claim that NASA isn't talking about these asteroids is.......what? It simply isn’t a true claim. What is to be gained by deceiving visitors to your channel with claim after claim after claim that turn out to simply not be true? Every time I check out a research paper cited on Angry Astronaut, every time I reference the Near Earth Objects Study organization to back check your claims I find that you have not told the truth. And I show you how to confirm whether I tell the truth. Truth demands scrutiny to demonstrate that it can be trusted.

[@RockinRobbins13]

KZbin has gone mad deleting and then duplicating posts with wild abandon. This is absolutely madness.

[@phoboskittym8500]

We are hit often enough throughout history, more than once thought, much more.

[@MichaelWinter-ss6lx]

Thats recently called a _reset_ event. We are constantly finding traces of past civilizations, with capabilities beyond our understanding. A large enough impact would bring us back to StoneAge in a single day. How much traces of us would be recognizable after a few years already?

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx We have not found any _"past civilizations, with capabilities beyond our understanding."_ Not one. There isn't a shred of evidence anywhere that any ever existed. "Reset events" are a myth, nothing more. We have a bunch of weird people with delusions inventing new religions. The great daddy civilization(s) is one of the stinkiest. If you want myths, the Norse did it best. They did amazing stuff. Your lost civilization spiel is just lame.

[@raygall6353]

Two questions. Why are you angry? Are you really an astronaut?🖖

[@OliverGrumitt]

The chances of an asteroid strike on Earth in the near future are very low, but not impossible. Of course, modern humanity has already experienced one such strike, in 1908, when a small asteroid or comet hit Siberia, destroying hundreds of square miles of forest around the area of the impact. Since this happened in the remote Siberian wilderness, no one was killed or injured. But had it impacted only slightly earlier, it could have destroyed a city like St. Petersburg or London and the death toll would have been enormous, in the millions. But as mentioned, the chances of it happening again in the near future are very low, so it would be correct to say more money and effort should be put in to try to deal with more immediate threats, but that is not to say no money should be spent at all on an attempt to detect any potentially dangerous asteroids thst may be on a collision course, or will be on a collision course with Earth. It is probable, though, that if it survives long enough, humanity will one day experience a devastating asteroid impact. Such an impact is a question of when, not if, even if it a long time from now.

[@sheekaloca]

I just got the loan for my breast augmentation.

[@maxmccain8950]

NASA = never a straight answer.

[@RockinRobbins13]

And I suppose you can honestly show a single time in NASA's history where they've lied about any achievement, failure or astronomical fact? Just one. We'll wait.

[@mervstash3692]

You need professional help mate. Spending this much time every week making videos about bigfoot is not healthy.

[@Lappillainen]

What is he talkin about again? there is a document titled "NASA Predicts Almost 30 Potential Earth Impacts For Approaching Asteroid". Easily found 😂 This channel is now like some ancient alien shitshow?

[@executivesteps]

He’s desperate for viewers - trying everything. Maybe he should consider getting a real day job

[@92redferrari]

Oh dear more space evangelism! At least its not a colony on mars bigger than Antarctica! With the mars colony dripping in milk and honey.

[@Mrbfgray]

What the heck are you here for?

[@GrigoriZhukov]

​@Mrbfgray just another troll seeking attention.

[@mikeharrington5593]

Too much sci-fi has been written about Mars, romantically suggesting that human habitation would be possible there. Nah, it's a death zone for life as we know it, but just for fun you could send fantasy wannabe-invincibles there, like Musk, Bezos, Trump ..

[@RockinRobbins13]

Nothing wrong with space evangelism! But we'd better be careful not to introduce Earth germs to Mars and then discover we killed the only extraterrestrial life we ever found.

[@executivesteps]

So a micrometeoroid could hit an asteroid calculated to miss Earth by 30,000 km and deflect it so it hits NYC. So you’re trying to outdo the History Channel. Groveling for views is really embarrassing. Maybe you should put the sunglasses back on and find a new hobby?

[@aaaaa5272]

@Angry, you behave like FOX news. Inventing scenarions that are not relevant.

[@bmobert]

How is the awareness of the cataclysm of an asteroid strike on a city not relevant? This is one of the few mega-disasters we can actually do something about if we really try. And, remember, these are examples of smallish, solarsystem objects we know about. There are plenty of solarsystem objects of this size we don't know about. Further, Oumuama demonstrated it's not just solarsystem objects we have to worry about. And a smaller object traveling at interstellar speeds will do significantly greater damage, not to mention being far harder to detect in time. Impacts are a real threat. Worse, a really bad one is only a matter of time. So, no. You're just wrong. This is as relevant as WWIII.