Three to tango resolves Riemann Hypothesis

[@aplusscience3834]

When someone makes highschool math errors and claim to have solved Riemann Hypothesis, you are so naivey arrogant, which are not the characteristic of a true subscriber to academia.

[@rhsolved]

I don't know who made me infamous arrogant, but I know I was not arrogant even to the slightest extent to my commentators. I just defended my work, when the queries started going beyond my reach I said please self help. True character of a math academic should be inspecting this work, and come out with new theorems, as all my work is numbers driven I have nothing to change.

[@RSLT]

1:26:53 What is the justification for this? To me, all you showed was a numeric counterexample that you claim is wrong. If anyone claims zeta(-1) = 1/2, that means they believe the zeta function is not defined correctly and that the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong. This is the definition of a numeric counterexample. The accepted value is zeta(-1) = -1/12, so if your function shows zeta(-1) = 1/2, that means there's a contradiction and it proves the claim is not correct. For example, if I say g(x) = x^2 + 1 is equal to f(x) = x^3 - 1, anyone can say my claim is false because g(0) = 1 and f(0) = -1. That's how we show something is wrong in mathematics. Go back and remove obvious contradiction.

[@rhsolved]

Will that not be too quick to declare, rather carry the multivalued stigma for some time it's not unified.

[@RSLT]

​@@rhsolved NO

[@heheheuseless3635]

@@rhsolved what the hell does this even mean? are u insane?

[@randyzeitman1354]

Seems the world would be celebrating that ... five years ago.

[@rhsolved]

That did not happen bcoz I didn't published my anti RSA algorithm which will collapse the internet security system.

[@youtubepooppismo5284]

​@@rhsolved we all believe that

[@rhsolved]

Don't say you didn't believe me, other wise I have to work on RSA algorithm to make you non believers believe me.

[@heheheuseless3635]

​@@rhsolvedPublish it please none of us will steal it, if its so groundbreaking let everyone see it

[@rhsolved]

What if someone of you are professional hackers and use that in money making and FBI/CIA catches me for leaking it.

[@heheheuseless3635]

Do you really believe what u do in the paper is correct and everyone giving the corrections in the comments are wrong?

[@rhsolved]

Those corrections don't lead to RH, RH can't be false, I have proven, it's time to work on the problem area and bring some new theorems.

[@heheheuseless3635]

@@rhsolved Those corrections lead to saying ur proof is wrong because of the mistakes. Get rid of ur ego and listen to more educated critisism and mybe ull get rid of ur highschool level mistakes