Thunderbird Fighter Pilot Reacts to SU-57 Airshow CLOSE-UP FOOTAGE

[@hassan_ksu]

It's incredible to see a Western pilot appreciating not just the skill of the Russian test pilot but also the engineering behind the Su-57, a true testament to the respect that transcends borders in the aviation community.

[@briancrawford69]

I'm sure it's overrated like almost all Russian and Chinese stuff

[@hassan_ksu]

@@briancrawford69 if you believe so. I don't care about politics but that SU-57 looks so good.

[@Volkodav-1]

Это редкий случай, а то часто американские специалисты предпочитают предвзято всё оценивать, часто с наклоном хвалить всё свое американское, даже если на деле чужое превосходит свое))

[@unotoli]

True professionals (aviators and military) respect each other In case you have not seen this - kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4DTqYOboM6LjZo

[@hassan_ksu]

@@unotoli I have not, watching now. Thanks

[@TJ_Loves2fish]

Incredible performance by pilot and aircraft.

[@allenlindsey1175]

In 91 i used to guard the flightline in kef ice for the 57th FIS. Many a time i seen 5 f16s roll out on the run way and take off with afterburner wide open. This SU57 took off faster and without afterburner straight UP!! What a Machine

[@gp33music41]

This video doesn't even show the full takeoff

[@briancrawford69]

It's also extremely light in air show configuration. F16s will do the same thing when not loaded up with weapons and full gas

[@juliap.5375]

@briancrawford69 It is full of fuel, do you think holding vertical position in skies like rocket and not moving is cheap thing? It burning fuel in incomparable amounts more than during regular flight. Also you can see all the same videos with weapons from military test sites. No difference.

[@vasilijevukadinovic6843]

​@@briancrawford69this is true but starting in a month all future planes su57m will have new engines. 20% more trust and they are lighter

[@alexs.4340]

@@juliap.5375 No it's not full of fuel, my two cents. I've seen other Su57 takeoff in full reheat and it required more than 10 seconds to lift off

[@DJEDzTV]

Test pilot is Sergey Bogdan, 62 years old and his surname literally translates to "Godgiven". Peace to all American aviators comrades.

[@FeralRabbit]

Sergey is a beast!!!

[@sas911sas]

...and he is a test (not show) pilot. He can fly any Su fighter in a similar way (like su-35 in France air show). He have a few interviews online and give a really good explanation of the concept of a fighter jet. To be a pilot like this, I guest, you have to have a great knowledge of aerodynamic, general physics and knowledge of rackets capability.....and maybe a ton other things. Great pilot and look like a nice person.

[@robertliddiard9822]

At around 5:00 minutes there is a few seconds where you can really see what the nozzles are doing. They move very fast so you have to watch closely but they are indeed moving in three directions. Awesome.

[@societyreborn33]

Good catch I definitely saw those adjusting

[@danielprada6153]

Su 57 is a beautiful plane

[@neutchain7838]

Not really a fan it's kinda flattened. I think the best looking Russian plane is the MIG29A. It doesn't have that bump on her back that later models had and it also lacks that weird looking thing between the engines. The 57 is not an ugly plane by any means but I wouldn't call it pretty. Beauty is ofc subjective. Russians build nice looking planes though. ( and some really ugly ones lol)

[@markdeckard7651]

Its a plane that bombs innocent civilians in Ukraine. WTF are you talking about?

[@cryonic.]

i just cant get enough of watching this jet perform at air shows

[@cyrusjimenez159]

I love the way you look at the picture of the plane from a real combat perspective.

[@giggling_boatswain]

I watched a lot of negative videos about this flight, but no one answered me what exactly they don't like. The task for designing an aircraft is given based on the doctrine (defensive, offensive. Russia has defensive). Many of the specified characteristics follow from this. Then, different countries have different philosophies, different ideas about what a modern air battle is. The US decided that the key to victory is stealth. The Russians agree with this in part, since they have good radars that can see a stealth aircraft. For the Russians, maneuverable air combat is part of their philosophy about modern air combat. Stealth implies sacrificing important flight characteristics for the sake of stealth. The Russians do not want to sacrifice them, so stealth technologies are used here without fanaticism, mainly from the front hemisphere, while maintaining all the important flight characteristics.

[@aerius30]

Exactly! The US made stealth a priority since they had to deal with tons of powerful & sophisticated ground based radars & air defence systems on the Russian side, they need as much stealth as possible to successfully penetrate deep into Russian air space and accomplish their missions. The Russians chose a different path for several reasons: NATO doesn't have nearly as many ground based radars & AD systems so there's more gaps to slip through, and more importantly, their job is to defend against NATO fighters while mostly staying within range of their own AD systems. They're not trying to sneak a jet into Poland to launch missiles at Germany, their main job is staying somewhere near their own AD systems to defend them from enemy planes. So while the F-22 and Su-57 are both 5th gen stealth fighters, they're not made to do the same thing. Comparing them against each other without going into and understanding all the systems & doctrines behind them leaves you with a very incomplete picture. Hopefully, we never have to find out who has the better system & doctrine for real.

[@vasyltkachov4100]

The answer is simple It was built in Russia by Russians and its a shame right now as no matter how good something is with Russophobia these days it's all automatically gets dismissed as garbage Shame it is what it is these days

[@aerofoca]

Love this! Im glad the Russians still put a lot stock into maneverability, not just stealth and BVR engagements as important as they are. Thanks again for an unbiased appraisal from a pilots POV. As an Aerospace engineer i love the synchronized dancing of the controls to get that amazing performance

[@MaxAfterburnerusa]

Thanks for watching the video!

[@cyh4031]

​@MaxAfterburnerusa I just recently purchased a nice gaming computer and x-plane 12. Can you help me figure out how to record and upload my x-plane adventures to KZbin? I have used the x-plane record feature, but can never find the saved files to edit. I managed a stabilized carrier landing in my f-14 tomcat yesterday, so I am hoping my skills after being away from x-plane for about 7 years after the loss of a mother board on my last computer. Thanks in advance!

[@Пень1Бук1]

Yes, the Su-57 has more opportunities to create invisibility. Its invisibility lies in electronic warfare, not in geometry and expensive coating, which is ineffective because the F-22 or F-35 lose maneuverability or payload because of this. There is even information that the Su-57 is capable of creating illusions for radars, cloning itself, or simply changing coordinates in space.

[@kborak]

Its also not the su-57. Some engineer you are, if you can't tell the T-50 from the su-57.

[@kborak]

@@Пень1Бук1 Right, just like Russia didn't kill a bunch of cosmonauts before Yuri.

[@atmospherestar7425]

Thanks for the video! I enjoyed it! This was a fairly objective commentary on the Su-57. You don't often see this among USA bloggers.

[@КонстантинГоломозов]

Amazing charisma and a great moustache(hope you don't have too much trouble looking after it) From the bottom of my heart I wish your channel to grow and achieve more popularity after the New Year. With respect from Russia.

[@itsjustdonkey777]

You can literally see the thrust vectoring in action! Kudo's to that pilot and the designers of the aircraft for an incredible show performance!

[@Jedbullet29]

That flat planing with thrust vectoring! Wow, what a pilot and a machine.

[@amunra5330]

Thank you for this unbiased analysis 🙏

[@korana6308]

I think you would be interested in watching a movie about it that Russia had recently released. I found it absolutely fascinating and exciting to watch. One of the highlights that I remember, is that there was an interview with Bogdan that said that he had experienced strobing like effect during those prolonged 9Gs maneuvers at that airshow. As if the image inside his brain refreshes like once per second during it(normal people/ untrained pilots would pass out long before that point)... Mad respect for that guy.

[@Dare2Blink]

please share the link to this video

[@korana6308]

​@@Dare2Blink no links allowed on yt. But it's called: " Su-57. Су-57. Властелины неба Документальный фильм к 85-летию ОКБ Сухого и ОКБ МиГ.15 декабря 2024 " You can watch it with English subtitles (auto generated). At around 2 minute 40 seconds mark into the video he says that " at an extremely low altitude 9Gs maneuvers which lasts for around 20 seconds" he had experienced that. He is 62 yo btw. They talk about the Su57 in general in that movie, it's characteristics and a new flat nozzle etc. edit: I found a better version in English dub called "Lords of the Sky Documentary on Sukhoi and the MiG Design Bureau - English translation" here on yt.

[@vadimzubovich8173]

@@Dare2Blink kzbin.info/www/bejne/kHmcap2io89jpLc&pp=ygUjU3UgNTcg0LLQu9Cw0YHRgtC10LvQuNC90Ysg0L3QtdCx0LA%3D But be informed that the subtitles are awful, there are multiple dumb literal translations that often completely change the meaning

[@mikes989]

@@vadimzubovich8173 the autosubtitles are a little better. but if you know a about some topics, you can "fix" the errors

[@pollylewis9611]

Thank you so much for showing and explaining how this beast can maneuver in the air kudos to the pilot wow. Awesome video!

[@Issaviiibe]

At 5:13 my man had to kinda apologize for being excited at a Russian jet 😂

[@tansinsami6253]

You need extremely talented pilots to use this beautiful specimen....just amazing

[@barrys1342]

Greetings from Cape Town South Africa 🇿🇦

[@JNo-sk5mz]

Su-57 and pilot are beasts. Props from USA to all involved

[@whitefox86]

It's good that you were given the opportunity to talk about this wonderful fighter

[@RaySarv]

Obviously everything is perfect on the design since it’s capable of pulling maneuvers that no fighter jet can duplicate, except one jet that comes pretty close to it. SU35s

[@briancrawford69]

Because other air forces don't think the same moves are needed. The cobra for instance serves little to no combat effectiveness. Just look neat at air shows

[@-Zevin-]

I love how positive you are, not letting national pride or bias color your view here. Also to the people who are inevitably going to accuse me of being pro Russian or something because of the Z profile. The Z is for my name, it has nothing to do with Russia...

[@MaxAfterburnerusa]

thanks, I just analyze jets from a pure pilots perspective

[@senti2175]

Anyone who downplays such a display only discredits himself no matter how nationalistic they are.

[@bluikkso]

@@MaxAfterburnerusa Objectivity seems to be in short supply these days, thanks

[@parmarealty2338]

у тебя еще есть V в твоем имени!!! Да ты точно русский!... Хотя бы по прабабушке)))

[@TheEddie458]

5:04 wow, look at the thrust nozzles moving along with the control surfaces (I know he's not applying thrust at that moment, but is a nice catch)

[@joshscott3271]

Wow, great seeing that from your perspective, really quite amazing. All the best wishes and Merry Christmas, and a happy new year when it arrives...

[@mohammadbabar61]

Su 57 is my fav jet

[@ifell3]

Appreciate this, its not until the close up I noticed how much the control surfaces are, well.... Controlled. Definitely my favourite plane, sexy as.

[@winnerwinnerchickendinner8809]

Not only performance but the skills of the pilot is amazing

[@reginaldlagrone5082]

Nice video, even though you are an America pilot you remained objective because the SU-57 is an outstanding aircraft.

[@brandonhord8949]

Hey man would love to see your reaction and analysis of the US Navy friendly fire incident on the F-18s that just happened.

[@OrbvsTomarvm]

thanks for this video. your expertise is much appreciated 👍🏻

[@shaheedmullajee8963]

Appreciate your unbiased assessment of this gorgeous Russian ballerina's performance. As an aviator you're clearly in love and can't wait to waltz with her. Great review man. ♥️♥️😊👏👏

[@EbizzerHH]

Insane manouverability... 360 thrust vectoring is way superiour to the 2-way thrust vectoring of the F-22! OFC I am sure with all avionics and systems the F-22 is superiour, but in close quarter dogfights... damn, this thing looks unstoppable!

[@davidhapka5410]

3D 360° thrust vectoring conventional nozzles will light up an F-22 radar like a Christmas tree.

[@michaeld1170]

@@davidhapka5410F-22 still has more power, so in a high speed fight at high G it will eat the Su-57

[@m.g7809]

@@davidhapka5410 Not if it's coming head-on.

[@flyingdutchman2195]

It is an amazing 4.5 Gen fighter but the fact that it was designed and built 20 years after the raptor which is an actual stealth jet and would kill this thing from BVR is kinda embarrassing honestly​@@m.g7809

[@Ignacio-d1j]

The su57 have superior avionics over the f22

[@jamesburrell677]

I've never enjoyed an airshow so much. It was great to listen to someone so knowledgeable explain what I was seeing. The felon is a bad boy and there is no point in not giving it credit.

[@yuanfurbax]

Love the T-50/T-52, Su-57S/Su-57SM. it sadly gets alot of hate bc it's Russian, not f22lvl stealth, low quantity but the aircraft for shows is probably the best imo

[@juliap.5375]

It is just commercial propaganda :) This propaganda even never mentions that Stealth came to US from Russia.

[@colonalklink14]

The Su 57 featured at the airshow was not a frontline fighter. That was an early prototype hence the rough edges, rivet joints, and old engines.

[@gwillis9797]

Su-57 engine placement was taken from the SR-71's engine placement. They did a beautiful job making it effective and a beautiful 5th gen. The Su-57 and the F- 22 performs like it looks. The F- 15 looks aggressive and performs aggressive. F- 16 looks sleek and like a dart.

[@rc_hodophile]

Very nice explanation

[@EveryoneIsFightingSomeBattle]

I've always wondered just how many of these supposedly stealth aircraft really are truly stealth - fifth gen platforms? Fancy geometric surfaces of the airframe alone, stealth does not make. You have special coatings, onboard computer systems, etc., that together with the physical characteristics of the airframe are what comprises a stealth system. Ryan - the mustache is truly top-notch. It looks darn good.

[@kabzebrowski]

Prolly all of them are tbh. RAM, RAS, EW, RTM, composites everywhere... we're long past the time where simple RCS simulations using metallic fuselage and canopies will give us a reliable answer.

[@vangarus]

Tell this to the F-117 shot down in Serbia by Soviet era air defence system from the 70s

[@kabzebrowski]

@@vangarus F-117 isn't a 5th gen plane, my man.

[@vangarus]

@@kabzebrowski yeah but the stealth coating is not that different, I'm not talking about engines, electronics etc

[@kabzebrowski]

@@vangarus Well, how would you know the coating is not that different?

[@workwithme5076]

At 5:00 we can see that the leading edge flaps are indeed movable and not permanent :)

[@alistairfletcher6187]

I wish you get to fly one someday somehow, I really get pumped from your enthusiasm. I'm not a pilot, just a musician, but I really like you childish joy, I'm the same with my gear. Merry Christmas

[@strizhi6717]

Thank you for the excellent review and reminding all this is T-50 testbed.. as a Russian you're one of the good Yanks I enjoy watching :))))) I hope to see you sometime once MAKS opens up and beers on me!!! Hi from Moscow 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪

[@johnpaulbacon8320]

Nice vdieo. Maybe the SU-57 should be called the Ballerina.

[@wallynocker]

this guy is pro as F..... reacting instinctively to what he see's

[@AdminAccount-cr2tb]

If the USA and Russia had been collaborators instead of rivals after ww2 aerospace would probably be 100 years more advanced than it is today

[@juliap.5375]

Actually no. In that case it would be no reasons for such good aviation. Proof: 1990s. After dissolve of USSR, US stopped development of F-22, Russia canceled own projects Su-47 and MiG 1.44 (reborn as J-20 later, because MiG team went to China) while both already had flight prototypes and were ready for serial production. There are more examples.

[@Obsidian-Nebula]

Competition makes better products. Capitalist economy is the best proof of that

[@fiorenzobrambilla8482]

Penso che tra grandi piloti ci sia un rispetto che va oltre alla nazionalità. Bravo ❤

[@Homosapien-218]

What a beautiful machine

[@jonitralala2783]

6:32 dude really flexing with that move..

[@franklinpaul1723]

I have been watching for a few months now. But I subscribed today Christmas eve. Merry Christmas to you

[@rokasb9441]

Interesting how his engine nozzles angle to the right, especially the right one at 2:44 befote the sideways flip... Also looks like either the pilot or the flight computer had the front flaps down for the most of the flight, as for example after landing they're raised :)

[@TitanAceKomp]

People buy tickets to see this thing. So that SU 57 is contributing in economy 😂

[@Kaizerg]

And that's how Air Ballet was born.

[@devrajroy1148]

0:50 that is drag chute housing.

[@alejandrocasalegno1657]

The famous "Pugachev´s Cobra" was made with the original Su-27 Flanker in the 80´s.....Today, with thrust vectoring engines, is a average thing......

[@briancrawford69]

The Russians learned it from Sweden

[@evilbabai7083]

​@@briancrawford69first performed with Saab 35 Draken to be exact. Actually, a lot of planes can perform it... not many can stabilise after that though. And even on those which can maintain the full control after that, it's considered not very useful given how situational it is (and, funnily enough, one of the worst ways to use it is the most prominently depicted - evading bogey from the six).

[@destroytheilluminati770]

I like nearly all of the Russian birds, they are definitely unique and in a class of their own and its not just the jets, the prop fighters are quite amazing as well, even the homely looking Polikarpov I-16 is quite a sight to see and hear

[@StayPuft80]

That is an incredible machine.

[@user_7132_Marushka]

Ok, I'll subscribe 😅 You're damn persuasive 😂😂😂

[@nikolaidvoriadkin6804]

Afterburner😂 what a Name 😂

[@magigooter2096]

Gobless the Russians' insistence on blue and white paint schemes. It looks so good.

[@konglee7284]

I wanted to hear that Howl Sound....!

[@ishido70]

Спасибо за непредвзятую оценку. 😊

[@Rek1emMScar]

Decide to Sub. Just because the Fairness to the Su-57. One thing that people don't talk too much about.. Its the Levcon on the Su-57. These thing are something else. To the point French has tested. How a 6gen stealth fighter with only Levcon as control surface would work.

[@pratiktandel5706]

His name is sergey bogdan a 62 yo legendary test pilot.

[@Thegargapitic1]

this is a beautiful aircraft!are they in use anywhere?

[@stufirewalker]

Hi, at 5 :25 you can see the nozzles vectoring ever so slightly

[@lightdafutao8696]

The T50 is actually a prototype, not a trainer

[@zvelekva]

Everyone commenting on how this guy is fair and balanced keep forgetting that when the odds are you might one day be facing off against these things (he is after all probably in the top 5% of US fighter pilots) there's no room for bravado and bs. That stuff is reserved for keyboard warriors (or perhaps much lesser pilots) who are never likely to find themselves looking an SU57 in the eye and having to survive the encounter. I'm gonna go out on a limb and hazard a guess that, considering he might very possibly get put in a situation where his life will depend on it, all he really wants to know is how he can beat this thing. And with that in mind I'm pretty sure he's acutely aware that no amount of chest puffing is in any way gonna bring him closer to ensuring that after the encounter he's the one who gets to hug his loved ones again...

[@zdaccess]

Хз как вы будете что то делать, если самолеты сбиваются за 100 км при обнаружении.

[@KonuralpBalcik]

Actually there were 2 more powerful engine options for the Su-57, but since it caused damage to the fuselage in high G turns, a less powerful engine was designed. Now it is equipped with a new afterburner and exhaust outlet.

[@KyleSchwanz]

Leading edge flaps are moving a lot in the vertical dance. They definitely function.

[@MaxAfterburnerusa]

Agreed!

[@jameswest4819]

Good to see someone that is obviously not a political psychological operator, describing a beautiful plane and its pilot's maneuvers.

[@lebethonii6683]

Respect

[@lomate1963]

Big up the wnker

[@minig4126]

So a stripped down “hot rodded” version of the plane got it. Cool to see the t-50 pic compared To the su-57

[@hiteshadhikari]

Not stripped down, more of a prototype

[@minig4126]

@ I was thinking no guns,ammo,missiles limited or no radar equipment the t-50 has to be significantly lighter then a “combat” ready load out imagine doing parkour with a 50lbs pack on.

[@mikes989]

Ha, yow looked for the video I told you!!! good!

[@JC130676]

Interesting video, here are some thoughts that occurred to me while watching: 1:57 Your remark makes wonder about the weight of this plane. If it's a demo only and thus a lot of equipment hasn't been installed, I think it's justified to wonder whether an actual production plane will have similar performance. After all, Russia has a history of being - ahem - "optimistic" about their hardware's performance. 2:17 It's my understanding that the exhausts aren't actually free to move in 3 dimensions, they're moving along only one axis which is almost but not quite vertical. So when the thrust is vectored up or down, it also introduces a horizontal component but it's not "real" 3D-vectoring like the X-31, F-18 HARV or F-16 MATV. 3:17 Won't having that many control surfaces moving also make it more difficult to manage the radar signature?

[@Andrew_Custodes]

I think - our pilots (Russian and American) can do a favor to each other - meet together only at the bar )))))

[@Beyonder1987]

If China and Russia built a fighter Jet together, they can build the best

[@19ij]

Всегда можно переехать в Россию, получить гражданство, пойти служить в ВВС и тогда уже полетать на СУ-57 ;-) Спасибо за объективный обзор. Мне доводилось видеть F-22 and F-35 at Sun&Fun in 2021/2023 respectively and you know what? Raptor can make some maneuvers but F-35.....

[@mnandeazy34]

At about the 4:50-4:55 mark, you can definitely see the leading edge flap moving and adjusting (Edit) Yup. Watched again to make sure i wasnt seein things lol that bad boy pushed downward HARD, as the aircraft continued its climb not moving around much

[@erikfleming9317]

You need to a video on the new 6th generation Chinese aircraft soon!

[@Diocilis]

The T50 did not originate from training. It is a derivative of the Russian word Triangular. Sukhoi has had an internal designation for developments since the 1950s. T-planes with triangular and trapezoidal wings, and C - planes with swept wings. That is, T10 is the factory designation of the Su-27 family. T8 is the factory designation of the Su-25. T6 is the factory designation of the Su-24. Where the first letter is the index, the next digit is the development number. However, if we are talking about the Su-24, then it should have been called C6, since the aircraft is equipped with a variable sweep wing, but it turned out that it was originally designed with a trapezoidal wing, which is why it was named T6.

[@lebethonii6683]

Beauty

[@braddbradd5671]

They have a new square flat nozzle now for the SU57 for mainly stealth so that with a new more powerful radar than the f35 and ceramic paint its getting closer to the F35.The Su57 was supposed to be a joint exercise with India but India pulled out because they wasn't happy with some issues with it .But now those issue seem to be ironed out India are back in it they have been offered for it to be 100% made in India and with full tech cheaper than the Rafale and i thin India can also sell them

[@othyvitswamba1111]

I want to see you in this jet. I am sure Vlad can ship one for you to test in the US.😂😂😂.

[@martinrezzy]

aaand 7:15 the front flaps come up...man i was sure these are static :)

[@707ststudioru7]

Су-57 это одноместный истребитель!

[@nakotaapache4674]

great review. humans could create nice and beauty tech

[@jamesleadley7872]

Those are actually the old engines as Saturn hasn't got the new ones working quite yet. It's part of the problem why other countries aren't buying yet. The entire plane being the wing and so many adjustable surfaces really allows the computer flight system to go where the pilot tells it to fast.

[@RexusOutfitters]

I hope the U.S. has an aircraft that generates similar enthusiasm for its performance!

[@MrShortStuff]

Nice smoke from the rear. What are your thoughts on the heat signature from the rear of this thing.

[@MaxAfterburnerusa]

Very unstealthy from the rear!

[@MrShortStuff]

@MaxAfterburnerusa that was more thought exactly. When I was deployed in Afghanistan I got to see alot of different people types of aircraft and drones but the back of this bad boy looks like it's asking for a nice stinger or manpad 😂

[@martinilopez1]

not final engines.. not final noozles

[@dannydandaniel8040]

Impressive machine! Might give the f22 a run for it's money in a close range dogfight. Think the f22 has more sophisticated stealth and radar, but that's just an assumption from the low tolerances I've seen on the su57

[@ruvimtrofimovich]

"Low tolerances" we've seen are on air show model.. They would not bring a combat production model to a public air show. Confidentiality is still a thing in military tech

[@paristo]

USA will not allow anyone to photograph F-22 avionics or even cockpit. Why you think that Russia would show Su-57 capabilities instead using these old T-50 prototypes that don't have final specs? Their serial production has started years back at accelerated rate, and now they have as well first export client buying Su-57's. We don't even know how much more or less (!) agile the serial production version is. As it can very well be 5-15% less than this, or better. We don't even know are these maneyvers in its limitations, or is there some play to push airframe even further in performance. As in every airshow analysts are there with stop watches and cameras, to later analyse everything. Do that on every public airshow to get the variation and changes in performance to find what could be limits, so that they can design patterns and tactics against it. The whole old "one circle Vs two circle" is basic, as you have lot of things you train for pilots to do and try to get upperhand. Lot of things based how pilots are trained, so there can be weakness they don't think, or that you can trick them to do etc. It is like chess, that evolves to poker and mixed with chicken.... Constantly played again and again with next maneuver like tic tac toe, until other does the fatal mistake and couldn't keep obvious tie situation.

[@kabzebrowski]

@@paristo The F-22 cockpit is not classified, we have pictures of it. The systems on the glasses are what's classified..

[@kpsig]

There is no “might”…

[@mikes989]

How come the previous video has 1.3 million views and this one only has 35 thousand?

[@MrDomingo55]

When it comes to aircraft pilot career, test pilots likely have the best job! They get to do things normal pilots would be dismissed for. It's a more dangerous job but this test pilot is 62 and still flying.

[@HerrDieGans]

Я русский и смотрю твой канал. Несмотря на то, что мы враги, ты стараешься максимально объективно относится к русским самолетам.

[@trumanhw]

Not all of us are your enemy. Many of us know the US Gov provoked this war, and we're both embarrassed and sorry for our Government's outrageous conduct. While our Ukraine project was worse, we've been doing this playbook since the 1990s, and is how we got many former Warsaw Bloc countries to "join" NATO. We used the very campaigns we call "interference" when others do it to us. Those politicians we couldn't bribe ... we pumped money into their competitor that was beyond what their opponent could compete with. We hijacked the judicial branch, and as we did with Yeltsin, ran campaigns to secure the presidency. Just as we're doing now in Hungary bc Orban isn't allowing mass migration. As we did against Milosevic in Serbia, across Arab countries in the "Arab Spring." And then, influenced media organizations to manufacture consent with an unwitting public. A public that wasn't familiar enough with our tactics to psychologically guard against our influence and insane amount of money pumped in. We did it in Ukraine in 2004 and finally the 2014 coup. We tried in Belarus _many times,_ and are engaged in outrageous malfeasance right now in Georgia. WE caused the Russo-Georgian war of 2008 ... yet, act like Russia was the aggressor. While the majority of Americans opposed to the Ukraine war do so on practical grounds like: "Ukraine isn't a democracy," and "We shouldn't be wasting the money," Russia has the moral high ground. Because the war isn't a byproduct of US policy, but the goal of it. As Olexiy Arestovich admitted in his 2019 interview. But the US Gov has tight control over social media and the "news" in the US, making it all but impossible to hear arguments against the "official narrative." Still, ~20% of us who are opposed actually understand what I've said, and [that] is a huge step in the right direction. To clarify (and contrary to what some may think) I'm a patriot who loves the principles upon which the US is founded. In fact, I served in the US Marine Corps. I'm not some DEI / BLM / Antifacrat nut. I'm just able to see things from both sides perspective. We would NEVER tolerate what we did in Ukraine being done to us. And we have no moral high ground to stand on; to include the mirotvorets list. 🤢🤮We tacitly allowed the assassination of Daria Dugina and possibly the ISIS attack. I am ashamed and sorry. And hope we one day have the clarity as a nation to apologize and ask forgiveness. Russia nothing but tried to support us ... with Putin being the first person to contact us after 9-11, and allowing us the use of their base from which to begin operations in Afghanistan. To our everlasting shame. 😢 УРААА ❤🇷🇺

[@Andy_Bram]

​@trumanhw Very well said, mate! It's always refreshing to see when somebody else gets it and understands everything in detail, as to what's gone on. The majority of people listen to, and parrot what the MSM or Western Politicians have said. Nothing worse than ignorant dumb people repeating the Western MSM narrative, while having the arrogance and confidence that they're well-informed. Lol, it drives me nuts. But, even worse are those who refuse to look at/accept true facts & evidence, and don't really care about the truth. Instead they just believe "We" westerners, are morally superior, no matter what. And everybody else is beneath them. I'm a 41 Yr-old Englishman, and the behaviour of my own Country & NATO has truly sickened me mate. I also match your sentiments with the whole DEI. / BLM. lunacy , too lol. Merry Christmas to you brother. God bless you and your family, and all the best (for all of us) in the New Year 🙏

[@Andy_Bram]

@HerrDieGans Merry Christmas, from England. I feel as though I have more incommon with Russia than I do my own Country. God bless you and the Russian people, my friend 🙏

[@jeremy112683]

hvae you seen the new thrust vectoring nozzles they are testing

[@paristo]

Those are so cool looking ones.

[@wendywes]

And the pilot is in his 60s 🎉

[@mattg9971]

"Skid Marks"...thats the callsign if you drag the tail

[@MaxAfterburnerusa]

hahaha perfect. SKID

[@paristo]

Can as well be "Tailpipe" or "Dragger" or something... But Russians don't use call signs. They use mission flight numbers of airframe. So you have "357" or "281" and like in use. The whole air defense network has the same numbers, so that people know who they are talking about.

[@zayugh]

You can probably dance your way through a gun fight then right 😂

[@1217Jlee]

I like that Su-57 it’s awesome plane… sexy too !!