TIGER 1 VS 4 M4s CHALLENGE!!! - Can Tiger Win? | WOT BLITZ

Muffin Merch! (Stuff I’d Totally Wear) - teespring.com/...
Become a Patron to help support the channel:
/ blitzwithmuffin
or
www.paypal.com...
Discord: / discord

[@marleymariquit5789]

You should've added 1 Fury and the rest are shermans

[@josephstalin9712]

Hehe, I understood the reference

[@beenthere.donethat]

Then the sherman's have to mix up their modules, just like the movie

[@darren_khy]

Hehe

[@yaboianz]

YESSSSSS

[@jessecampos833]

In the movies they were easy eights not Sherman’s but the easy eights had Sherman guns

[@thebatfilms5792]

It would also be cool playing like this in the realistic mode

[@codeplaysgames7681]

Give me Tiger 1 and put me against 7 Shermans in Realistic. I can win easily. Even put my gainst tier 6 Shermans with the better gun.

[@dertama1671]

M6A2E1 its OP in realistic mode

[@thebatfilms5792]

@Santiago Mariscal Maybe

[@leowcheewai8053]

War thunder :>

[@UrBoyBipolar]

Ever heard of War Thunder lol

[@professormanhattan7254]

Dude, you could have handled the Shermans, you just needed to use cover and not drive with your rear facing three of them. Reposition so that you are always facing forward, unlike British tanks, German tanks have a reverse gear ;)

[@yuvrajshah1158]

And French tanks only have reverse gears!

[@kecsek3496]

@@yuvrajshah1158 NICE

[@CharyllGabrielCAclao]

why forward?? i mean sure 75 mm cant pen that but what about 76 mm you can angle your hull for better armour performance

[@NoovGuyMC]

@@CharyllGabrielCAclao they can't angle when we keep spamming the tracks

[@humanhuman5024]

@@NoovGuyMC it does not matter this is not warthunder so the tiger has super good front armor that can take the 76mm so you need to flank this guy was not play good because he was constantly showing sides, rushing in when he did not mean to, and did not take out one by one and instead trued to get them all down the low health and then finish them off

[@fritzvongerbel8999]

Historically you would want to be as far away from them as possible. Distance is your bestfriend

[@CHNO-de5wt]

True because at a further distance the 75mm cannon couldn't pen the tiger 1 but up close it can.

[@CharyllGabrielCAclao]

@@CHNO-de5wt well not really 76mm can though

[@youlaughyouphill842]

@@CharyllGabrielCAclao well yes really, he said 75 not 76

[@Delta-ro3kx]

So if anyone is wondering about how it was in history, here we go (I am doing this from memory so dont roast me lol): Needless to say that tanks have neither Hitpoints nor Dpm, thus the Tiger would lose two of its main strengths in Blitz. The armor was 100mm as opposed to about 150mm in Blitz. Surprising to most will be the fact that the Sherman's armor almost matched the Tiger's armor at around 90mm effective, as the Sherman had sloped armor. Despite the Tiger being surprisingly mobile for its weight, it wouldnt compare to its Blitz representation. The Sherman's mobility was vastly superior as it was a medium tank, duh. In history, the battle would have taken place at way greater distances, giving the Tiger a great advantage as its penetration overmatched the penetration of a Sherman by a factor of almost two (Its hard to find proper data on this). This would apply to Shermans equipped with the 75mm gun M3 (which all of the ones in the video are). In 1943, however, a new gun was fitted into the M4. The 76mm Gun M1A2 gave the Sherman significantly better AT performance and was able to take on a Tiger, although the Tiger remained superior. At that point, Allied platoons were organized so each platoon had at least one "Easy Eight", Sherman Firefly, M10 Wolverine or M18 Hellcat to counter Tiger's or even Panthers in the unlikely event of an encounter. Assuming the Shermans managed to get into close conbat like in the video, it is likely they would win. Their superior numbers and maneuverability would enable one of them to take the Tiger out with a sideshot, even if none of them had a 76mm gun or better. However, getting into that situation would be the problem in the first place. It would probably only be possible in an urban battlefield. In a realistic scenario, it is likely that the Shermans would call for artillery or air support upon spotting the Tiger. Encountering these vehicles was rare anyway because of their low numbers and their mechanical unreliability, and the American forces had absolute numerical and air superiority. The M4 Sherman was not intended to fight the Tiger, and mostly didnt. Out of the entire manual of the Sherman only very few pages were dedicated to tank to tank combat: for a reason. The reason why tank crews insisted on keeping the 75mm despite increasing numbers of Heavily armored tanks and the introduction of the 76mm was the fact that the old gun was multi-purpose. It did the job way better for Anti-Infantry and against enemy positions like MG nests, which was the things the Sherman had to do most of the time. The M4 was fairly superior to contemporary mediums at its introduction, was insanely reliable and easy to repair, easy to transport (imagine having to ship a Tiger over the Atlantic, most trains, bridges and cranes wouldnt make it) and remained an absolute match winner and is my favourite tank lol. The Tiger, hugely overhyped by fans, and unfairly looked down on by critics, was intended as breakthrough vehicle and filled that role perfectly. Its weaknesses were acceptable for the role it was supposed to play (a breakthrough vehicle needs to last only as long as the breakthrough does, before it can go onto maintenance, thus reliability is almost irrelevant as a breakthrough didnt last that long). Only if used as heavy tank in defense and constantly in use, it would fail as it kind of did in the war. Both tanks were great as long as used correctly. Bruh why did you bother reading lmao

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Wow, longest comment ever lol

[@Delta-ro3kx]

lol sorry bout that

[@ethdog1013]

Thank u this was very helpful I did not know sherman's did not battle the tigers and just stay back until artillery came in. Thank u this very helpful and I appreciate people like u.

[@abhinavmk6365]

I love detailed comments about tanks.

[@Delta-ro3kx]

oh I forgot I published an entire novel here, but glad some people liked it lol

[@ninaadagashe6343]

In the last game, he should have taken out the low hp Shermans first instead of shooting all of them, so there would be less guns shooting at him

[@afuerino75]

Try killing Godzilla: 7 tier VII vs Maus

[@spermchef2731]

Afuerino from my experience in boss rooms, a maus wont do sht against 7 tier sevens, a maus couldnt even beat a team of kv2s

[@afuerino75]

@@spermchef2731 I done it and it was a crazy thing.

[@scrublord3376]

Dab_531 agreed. This time they could be su 152’s and just load up the heat XD

[@Lada-cq2lr]

@@scrublord3376 or HE

[@beenthere.donethat]

@@scrublord3376 Heat still isn't enough

[@West_Coast_Mainline]

“Tiger one was beast” Then along comes the small pebble in the transmission The along came the 76mm Then along came the jumbo Then along came the firefly

[@randominternetguy88]

it was good at specific area. Not at everything. Much debated, the armor of the Tiger wasn't all too good. The gun though, hit like a truck. Of course every tank has it's bad areas.

[@_nik000]

Alternate title: How FURY should've ended.

[@roman8729]

You could also made a more late-war battle, with like 1 tiger 1, and (maybe) 1 tiger 2 VS the sherman firefly

[@illustrious-c87b28]

Fury

[@hanskrebs4298]

Nice profile pic. Wait is that azur lane

[@leowcheewai8053]

hans krebs wait...

[@hanskrebs4298]

@@leowcheewai8053 what

[@leowcheewai8053]

hans krebs nothing...

[@hanskrebs4298]

@@leowcheewai8053 did you did some research on something. Your so sus

[@Bread-gw6lz]

In the last game, he might have won if he didn't turn to face the not m4 tank. It would be much more effective to show his front armour to the majority of the tanks than to fully turn and show his back.

[@CharyllGabrielCAclao]

in wot or real life? the tiger has to angle to be almost invincible because the armour is placed like a box you manually had to angle it it can bounce most of shells if you angle it

[@Grandizer8989]

Fun fact: American Sherman’s only encountered Tiger 1s 3 times in WW2. The British and Canadians bore the brunt of Tigers in Africa and Normandy.

[@panzerv5]

6:09 oh cmon guys this fan wants to be recognized. Lets gib him some appreciation

[@kecsek3496]

"A Tiger is better than 10 Shermans... but the Americans always have 11." This is a german soldier saying from the war. :D

[@klaushauschen]

Fun fact: It actually requires 5 shermans to take out 1 tiger in real life.

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Dang!

[@barbarossavr]

Fun fact: just a myth

[@klaushauschen]

@@barbarossavr yeah it was a myth yet its a fun fact

[@ThatOneMan830]

@@ThunderWithMuffin Actually, this is not true. Hell, if anything, the Sherman was a vastly superior tank to the Tiger I, being more reliable, easier to produce, a lot safer for the crew, low maintenance, easy to repair... The list goes on. The Tiger had a stronger gun, no question, and the armor could be angled well, which was actually encouraged (see: TigerFibel.) That aside, however, not only was it horribly complicated, but repairing it was actual hell due to how it was built. Then you add on that, until the very end of the war, their reliability was garbage, especially with the transmission. At said end of the war they were as reliable as the Panzer IV, which is good, but by then, as it was at the outset, Germany was toast. The number of kills pulled off by Tigers was also massively inflated. It doesn't help that, after WWII, the Soviets didn't speak much about what happened on the Eastern Front, so a lot of what we knew up until the 90s was written by German officers... Which led to the whitewashing of war crimes by the Wehrmacht, "Just following orders" being amplified, denial of the Holocaust being widely known, GeneralPlan Ost being buried, the Soviets using "muh Asiatic Hordes" of men to make the Germans run out of ammo, etc., etc. The memoirs, testimonies, etc. of German officers from the 40s-50s-60s is why we have not only Wehraboos, but a lot of proud Neo-Nazis and Holocaust Deniers. If you want to know more, I strongly recommend looking into books, such as those by Steven Zaloga, or asking folks like the Chieftian. There's even places on Reddit where you can ask, such as r/ShitWehraboosSay and r/BadHistory; people will be more than eager to disprove the "Invincible Tiger" myth. Thankfully, increased awareness of the cleansing bullshit pulled by the Germans after WWII has lead to the attitude towards the Sherman, Tiger, and even Panther changing, with the Sherman being seen as the good tank that it was, while the Tiger and Panther are seen as tanks that, while well armed and armored, were horrifically unreliable. I end on a verifiable fun fact of my own: During post-war tests of 2 captured Jagdpanthers and 2 captured Panthers, the French discovered that the Panther's reliability was an utter catastrophe. Quotations follow: “The original intention of testing the three types in the Panther series, i.e. Panther Tank, Jagd Panther and Panther A.R.V., had therefore, to be abandoned and efforts directed to obtaining such data as could be obtained from those vehicles which could be induced to run, using the remainder as a source of spare parts” And most damning of all: *“The truly weak spot of the Panther is its final drive, which is of too weak a design and has an average fatigue life of only 150 km.”* Quotations taken from French postwar testing, translated in the book, Panther & Its Variants (The Spielberger German Armor & Military Vehicles), written by Walter J. Spielbeger. Also this, written by the Chieftian and Mark Singer: worldoftanks.com/en/news/chieftain/chieftains-hatch-french-panthers/

[@zanediezeljuan8999]

@Mate Bruh the sherman easy8 can easily pen the tiger upfront

[@v1bubblegumpink672]

Heh, that's of the reasons why even the German Tigers couldn't stop the allies pushing from the west during the WW2. The Shermans weren't as good as the Tigers but there was much more of them... Overall, cool video sir ! :)

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Thank you!

[@dylanxie1325]

Fury w/ 3 other Sherman’s pls

[@herbertgearing1702]

Most of the outlandish sounding accounts of tiger 1s achieving massive kill counts are in favorable positions which allowed them to engage enemies at a range of a mile more or less where the numerous enemies would have to close the distance more than half way under deadly fire before their guns had a chance to penetrate the tiger. The other favorable positions were holding a bottleneck where only one or two enemy tanks could be in front of you at the same time. The tiger was capable of destroying most medium allied tanks starting at 2000 meters or 1.2 miles and could do so with chilling accuracy starting around 1500 meters. The early t34s and Shermans had to be around 500 meters before they had much hope of getting through the tiger's armor. Tiger 1s were not the indestructible monsters they are made out to be, but they performed very well considering their small numbers and the fact that they spent most of the war doing a job they were not designed to do. Both the tiger 1 and 2 were meant to be breakthrough tanks at the tip of the spear initiating an offensive operation. Unfortunately for them by the time they were available in any useful numbers Germany had lost the initiative and spent the rest of the war on the the defensive. The tigers much like most of the German military despised being on the defensive and being forced to react to the enemy rather than imposing your will, but I guess it shows that you don't have to like a job to be an overachiever.

[@MrPhoenixWT]

Can we do 2 tiger 2 vs 6 t 34 (Russian mediums ) this would be so sick

[@racelkatyusha403]

Russians bias of course will win

[@racelkatyusha403]

Also NOT tiger 2 Tiger 1

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Yeah friend me in the game and we’ll try it out!

[@MrPhoenixWT]

Blitz with Muffin Oh noice! My user name is Mr_Pheonix_YT

[@MrPhoenixWT]

Blitz with Muffin however I’m On EU server. I’m guessing your NA ?

[@Archeangelous]

Why do I always get teammates who think their Tiger I can yolo solo into the reds? 😑

[@imreallynoob8311]

Lol

[@shofi1467]

Because they think they have stronger armour then the tank they are using happens to me I used to playing maus and play with a kv2 and dies instantly

[@bilgitz1900]

German soldier: one German tank is better than ten American tanks, but they all ways seem to have 11. American soldier: A German tank would run out of ammo before Americans ran out of tanks.

[@collinwhite5799]

Dude love the video, just a thought....Dracs vs Smashers?? 2 of the most op tanks?? Just a thought idk how fair it would be for either side. 😂😂

[@collinwhite5799]

@Jason Cheng ya...

[@Mr_AntiSocial]

Yes, cos T6 DrAcUlA iS oVeRpOwErEd

[@collinwhite5799]

@@Mr_AntiSocial YeSsIR

[@scropia4613]

They kinda bad, they could of just shoot the track

[@tanukijota3777]

Your best chance would have been to set up an ambush mid map... and then your turret would have mattered more.

[@nightingale-d3e]

Correction: Tiger I (with stock engine and gun) vs 3 M4 Shermans (stock turret but the gun is impossible to access) & 1 Easy 8 (or the fury)

[@aluminiumknight4038]

Wow you did my suggestion! Cool! I wanted one firefly with them and to fight Normandy though lol

[@darren_khy]

I never knew tigers had such great mobility

[@berendnap596]

This was actually pretty realistic bc normally a collum of shermans would always be of at least 5 because that could for sure beat a tiger

[@ket451]

wrong, they always traveled in 5's, every vehicle did and had to. that's the minimum for an entire squad of vehicles. and even then, 5 Shermans wasn't exactly capable of destroying a Tiger I in combat depending on variant and range

[@berendnap596]

@@ket451 yeah oke but at least at the later part of the war where almost every german tank veteran was like yknow quite dead so the probability of the 5 shermans fucking up the tiger would be quite big yknow i mean if they come up against a rly experienced tank commander the chance of the tuger winning would be quite big at least if they dont come up against a firefly or against one with a 76mm gun so i think the chances of a sherman colum winning against one tiger are pretty big

[@ket451]

@@berendnap596 but would they meet a Tiger I? very unlikely even in Germany, they were expensive and used a lot of materials, as well as being unreliable. so they instead produced Panzer IV's and Jagdpanzer IV's as those worked well enough. gotta think about everything here bud

[@bliztanker3855]

Muffin: get over here! M4: I’m out

[@jbs1211]

it’d be more accurate with both teams having stock engine and tiger with the L/56 in realistic mode. But guess that’s pain

[@thomasshelbyasmrconnoiseur7046]

A tiger 1 once killed 22 t-34s in the eastern front

[@Jose-jj8jr]

Your a bloody legend!keep up the fun work! Really enjoying it!

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Thank you!

[@michaeltran2962]

You should do more of these challenges with lower engine and tracks with, probably, turrets and guns (depending on historical accuracies), no provisions and no consumables. It would make the ww2 related challenges a lot more fun and interesting.

[@Mountainkaiju004]

Fun fact in ww2 a tiger could knockout a single m4 with one shot if I recall correctly the tiger was an m4 worst enemy during the war

[@prvt.harumi6821]

Most tanks died in a single shot. Panthers and slugs were more feared

[@Mountainkaiju004]

@@prvt.harumi6821 I meant more in the since that if I remember the tiger could easily penetrate a m4

[@prvt.harumi6821]

@@Mountainkaiju004 eh

[@hansenm.k1686]

To make it fair, you should remove all the engine power options and traverse slowly

[@jayantbhagat593]

Hey mate I want u to make a video in which tiger 1 faces off against 4 m4 Sherman's and where m4 shermans rush towards the tiger and 1 Sherman could be Sherman firefly, same that happened in fury film .plz ;)

[@zarathos9949]

This is basically the part of Fury where the Shermans gets ambushed

[@pendulm69]

What about Tiger2 vs Jumbo Shermans

[@chow4101]

🤔🤔

[@Ivan79QM]

wt

[@Cristian88.]

They were noobs, they loss lots of shot and don't attack tougher, the don't use APCR and fire only on your reds part. In the reality 3 Shermans are enough

[@justacasualplayer3603]

Ok Kid 👦

[@dominicgorriceta6487]

Dominic Rendon Bruh its called facts, if those sherman players were actually veterans, the tiger would be dead

[@bluesky_cupy5158]

@@dominicgorriceta6487 Not to mention the fact that Tiger tanks suffered a lot of problems, these include the transmission breaking several times to random engine fires on the Tiger II's engine block

[@codeplaysgames7681]

Lets make clear something. Real tiger had a smaller gun. And it would be tier 6 not 7. Second if we make both tanks crewed by veterns tiger 1 would win. Its due to tiger superior firepower. A single tiger in a push can spot and fire from way further and still hit and knock out shermans. Niq the myth 5 sherman for 1 tiger isn't true. But its true tiger 1 has superior firepower and can easily take out a sherman platoon. Another fact is tiger 1 is a tank killing machine, shermans not. Both made for completey different roles. So don't be mad. Overall intial Tiger 1 Crew were extremely good. Tiger 1 was not an easy tank to run and you had to be extremly good to be in one.

[@codeplaysgames7681]

@@dominicgorriceta6487Wrong. I have studied Tiger 1.

[@dooogides9176]

Man as 7y old player Tiger is one of tanks if u get more professional the more fun in WOT blitz and WT Note best Sherman is Britain firefly (fast reload and high damage per shoot ) are really hard if they are 4 of them

[@Luvfiti18]

Ahhh hey muffun it actually M4A3E8 sherman tank and 3 m4 sherman i think

[@AndreiiWOTB]

Look how the times pasted i remembered muffin playing wotb now its warthunder,Congrats muffin subscriber since late 2021.

[@jacobrichards5141]

Do the challenge again, but for realism use stock gun on both tiger and sherman and not the top engine on the tiger

[@_aragornyesyes_7171]

Jacob Richards if this was realistic the tiger suspension would brake

[@jacobrichards5141]

@@_aragornyesyes_7171 yeah and the crew would panic and abandon it 😂

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Lol!

[@thepurpleantidote8709]

Jesus, shermans are like a swarm of angry bee's

[@no-life4438]

Wasn’t there a firefly sherman aswell?

[@scrublord3376]

Try 6 shermans but put in 1 firefly :)

[@siddiqueabu4064]

In war thunder even 8 Sherman's won't stand a match

[@condesdexterp.8409]

Bruh My Sherman Firefly can one shot kill that Tiger and even My Sherman Jumbo

[@videogamescausentviolence5717]

OMG! This is actually so fun! I subbed and hit the bell

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Nice!

[@jacobtrump2209]

Try the same challange only with t 34s (the Russian tier 5) I heard time and time again Russia would lose 5 t 34 for every tiger that got destroyed. Test that and see if it works in blitz

[@thebigfatcat8711]

Don’t forget that at one point, Americans were fighting Tiger II tanks with M4 Shermans... Tier 5 vs tier 8, no wonder they got wrecked haha

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Haha wow

[@ilikestukas902]

BFV that has unlimited repair kits: *Haha Hartmann and Müller go ficcs*

[@ZombieRush22579]

This is probably how the Americans felt battling a tiger

[@alexanderxu6809]

i think u should be the tiger 131 because that one really represents the actual tiger

[@vonmiller4-life610]

Congratulations, U Got One iron Cross Medal. XD

[@eagles5727]

T34s vs tiger

[@samphung3304]

This is literally fury in a nutshell

[@VKK-cr1uk]

I'm surprised that the Tiger even move without the transmission crapping itself

[@jocelynndotson7273]

It's WOT the engines don't break down but they can take damage from an enemy shell

[@innosong8747]

The Germans actually made this excuse: “Our tiger can stand up against 10 of your Shermans - but you always have 11!”

[@Png131]

For those who don't know Sherman tanks were made against to Japan Empire because the Allice powers needed fast and easily repairable tanks, so Sherman tanks were successful in their main mission and they sended to the western front cause of the price of it you know everyone can put a metal sheet that has the same thickness with the paper 📃

[@MrRtms24]

Come on muffin this is so unrealistic. You and I both know it would have taken at least 7 Sherman’s to beat you

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Haha of course!

[@danish3625]

This is like the movie FURY Edit:you should watch it if you haven't

[@cancracker]

One of the Shermans should be a Firefly to make it historically correct.

[@professormanhattan7254]

Also, I Think it would be interesting to have a normandy landing sort of game if you are interested. It would work something like this: Axis side: 1 Tiger 2 (Preferably savage) Ask if you need one :) 2 Panther (Normandy camo) 4 Panzerkampftagen IV (normandy camo) any type from tier 4 to 5 Allies: 1 T 32 american heavy tank 1 Pershing 1 T20 american medium 4 M4 Sherman (tier 5 variant) Up to you if you want use the idea. Let me know if you need any volunteers, cheers!

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Love it!

[@dansmagicalcreations2162]

Blitz with Muffin you could stage WW2 battles like Kursk, Normandy, battle for Berlin( himmelsdorf) and others

[@danielcervantes7826]

Historically those 76mm guns would cut right through a tiger at that range

[@ArcticWolf00Alpha0]

I think you could have taken those Shermans easily, what you should have done is taken your tank and moved it to 1 position at a time, when you attacked the Shermans they were together, you should've used the cover to your advantage but you allowed yourself to be swarmed by rushing the Enemy. In short you pulled a Fury and closed the distance when you didnt need to.

[@vladstanciu334]

Fury time

[@duckduckplay908]

I love this vid. It gives me ideas what tanks I should use in blitz

[@m1a2abramsmainbattletank58]

In real life, the Tiger 1 is the most feared ww2 heavy tanks

[@announcerspeakerboxbfdi4966]

Normally the tiger would hide in a bush while the Sherman's go in a colloum

[@VAclarxDre]

My man laggin 😆

[@mrsquiddler]

this is the first muffin video i saw (when it came out)

[@blitzingtime8340]

Realistically who shot first usually won

[@Circle_Sphere]

It's fury the movie! Nice gentle man!

[@dkuiper]

extremely scaring to do! nice vids.

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

Thx!

[@mizukubay804]

Even if 1on5, we will need 2 Shermans Sacrifice...

[@abu1239]

this is the video i was really waiting for.

[@anyskywalker547]

Fury Is unreal 🤣

[@terryallen6722]

It’s the saying there was 387 tigers made but the Americans always had 5 more or something like that

[@federicoperini7854]

Next time do King Tiger vs fireflies

[@frieddicken3991]

Ayyy no plot armor

[@idiotwholikestanks539]

You should make the movie fury and T34

[@nightmarescars5106]

Tecnical tiger 131 and m4 sherman, firefly and m4e8

[@samanvith8149]

In WW2 it was actually 1 Tiger-1 Vs 92 shermans

[@user-no3id7li4h]

I don't care what you say. The tiger 1 is shit against it's own tier when you first get it because of the open maps. Along with the most commonly used upper tiered tank that can match up with the tiger 1 always penetrates. Even if i use my surroundings to my advantage

[@niceangrydad6554]

Who the hell told you they can load pramo at you wtf

[@tonystark3655]

Please do King tiger vs Sherman or maus vs Shermans

[@reginaldbetrayer6258]

Request: 4 Tiger 2 vs 8 Comets

[@hahapain.4521]

thinking of the tiger reminds me of the russian tank film "white tiger"

[@user-bu4yq9px5y]

That tiger looked so cursed XD. It was like a tiger p and a tog got stuffed into a blender or a compactor

[@hahapain.4521]

1040 p i think it's funny how the tigers gun the 8.8 cm was shooting like a 152mm

[@RPC_SCP_USS_CRM]

Well it seems this one related to fury wow nice epic battle

[@AJ15_realdrum]

Tiger P, tiger I, tiger 131 vs sherman E8, sherman E 2, firefly, M4 sherman, sherman V, M42E4

[@achillemissiroli2146]

Of course a tiger would lose vs x5 shermans, 'cause they rely in speed and destroying it by taking turns!

[@commandercakecat]

"5 Sherman's 1 Tiger"

[@jhajhadex9480]

It also says the it takes 5 Shermans to destroy 1 Tiger

[@tomfrommicrosoft2683]

Muffin! i had a really good idea for a battle! What if you tried like a battle of Stalingrad?

[@ThunderWithMuffin]

T_Playz _MC that’s be cool! What would the challenge look like with what tanks?

[@tomfrommicrosoft2683]

@@ThunderWithMuffin Maybe some T-34's And T-34-76's Along with some Pz IV's and some Tigers? Not really sure :)

[@Hyduwegorz]

That will be cool see panther vs t 34

[@erikaitsumi3113]

the problem is that you didn't focus to other low hp Tanks in the 1v5 match, Nice vid btw

[@vojnanaoruzanja9901]

The real Fury scene, not fake one

[@matheusarrudasantos2205]

It is not m4 sherman, it is the M4A3e8 sherman

[@thebatfilms5792]

Cool, funny that I commented this and like an hour after that the vid came out 😁

[@damnitschnell8908]

WW2 is just an uptiered matchmaking