Time Dilation - Einstein's Theory Of Relativity Explained!

Time dilation and Einstein’s theory of relativity go hand in hand. Albert Einstein is the most popular physicist, as he formulated the theory of relativity, which gave the Energy mass equivalence formula and is directly related to time dilation. But what is time dilation? Time dilation and space time are interrelated. Einstein made one of the most important contributions to physics and had the concept of space time explained. A simple explanation of space time is that it is a mathematical model that fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional continuum. But it is very important to understand that the general theory of relativity and the special theory of relativity are different. In this short animated video, we give a simple explanation of time dilation and Einstein’s theory of relativity and also explain how time slows down in a moving vehicle!
#science #animation #timedilation #TheoryofRelativity
References:
faraday.physics.utoronto.ca/P...
newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einstein...
web.pa.msu.edu/courses/2000fa...
www.physics.nyu.edu/~ts2/Anima...
Original Article Link: www.scienceabc.com/nature/uni...
If you wish to buy/license this video, please write to us at [e-mail].
Voice Over Artist: John Staughton ( www.fiverr.com/jswildwood )
SUBSCRIBE to get more such science videos!
/ @scienceabc
Follow us on Twitter!
/ abc_science
Follow us on Facebook!
/ sciabc
Follow our Website!
www.scienceabc.com

[@intergxntlcare]

Einstein discovered this theory in his mind without the internet. I have the internet at my hands, I've watched this video twice and am still struggling.

[@ikmalaxl5286]

U must be religious

[@d-train115]

Ikmal Axl shut up

[@ikmalaxl5286]

@@d-train115 shut up

[@captainobvious.29yearsago70]

Hey, hey guys, relax, your _both_ assholes

[@wair138]

@@captainobvious.29yearsago70 You're

[@exakdev2631]

time dilatation can be observed when your wife says she needs 5 minutes to get dressed. On your watch it passed 45 minutes, but for her it's still 5 minutes.

[@sanchaykhatri7383]

Someone Give Nobel To This Man

[@AverageD0Rk]

Lmaooo nice

[@sagarpatil6086]

Lol dude😂

[@zeyy84]

Time dilation in a nutshell

[@Sa_tycker_jag]

And the funny is when she is done, she gets angry when you need 1 minute to get your shoes

[@datboitrump5070]

For those who don’t understand why moving really fast makes you slow down time: Light must remain constant, let’s imagine you’re practising for a race with a photon who travels at -300,000 kilometers a second. You’ve trained really hard and you think you might be able to get close to the photon after getting a new personal best of 299,999 kilometres per second. You and the photon line up for your big race, everyone’s watching! You run your hardest and reach 299,000 km/s, but wait, the photon should only be travelling 1,000km/s faster than you since that’s the difference in your speeds. But instead, the photon is still travelling 300,000 km/s away from you. How can this be? Does that mean the photon is travelling faster than the speed of light? I cant tell you why the speed of light must remain constant, just the way it is. But how does it seem to travel as fast as you at 299,000km/s plus an additional 300,000km/s, that’s faster than light speed, which is impossible! What actually happens is the time you experience is slowed down enough so that relative to the photon, you’re actually stationary and it’s just zooming past you as if nothing is happening at all. This is because light doesn’t experience time, from the perspective of a photon the universe has started and ended in an instant. If we were ever able to travel at the speed of light even for a nanosecond, then the extreme time dilation would zap us into the end of the universe, literally instantaneously. This is what annoys me so much about people wanting to travel faster than light, like yeah, great idea, you’ll certainly find out if there’s a God if you do.

[@stewiesaidthat]

Nothing can travel at the speed of light except light. As you accelerate in space, you lose mass. By the time you get to SOL, there is no mass left to push against. You can delay the mass to energy conversion process by cooling the atoms being accelerated (atomic clock, for example). At some point, though, the accelerative forces cancel out the cooling forces, and mass destruction begins. A photon doesn't experience time because it has no mass to accelerate. It does, however, experience space and collects information along the way that is imparted into the detector at journeys end. Time within the Space frame is just information. No atoms actually exist outside of the present.

[@nineonine9082]

Great comment, I think it helped me understand, but a question if you do get this, does that then mean that light has infinite speed, but because of the fact that we can only measure light because of time, that time itself it the limiting factor in it's measurement? Gonna break my brain, so for example say you have a vision of 100km, at one end you see 100km, straight infront of you, but if you move 150km in, you will now see 100km to your left and to your right, this is of course assuming a 2d universe or whatever, by moving in we are changing out measurement position, so we can see more, but the rule has not changed.

[@stewiesaidthat]

@nineonine9082 light has a propagation rate. It's speed is based on the permittivity of space. Permittivity is electrical energy. To have infinite speed, you would need infinite energy. You are at the center of your visible universe. Since the permittivity of space is essentially uniform, excluding black holes and such, your visible universe is a uniform circle around you. Stationary objects drop in and out of your circle as you move about in space.

[@xaviermax4788]

I dont get really get this.. on what basis do you say that the photon will travel 300000km/s away from you even when you are travelling at 299000km/s.. pls bare with me here ive just been introduced to all this

[@stewiesaidthat]

@@xaviermax4788 the speed of light is ruled by the permittivity of the space in which it travels. Permittivity is electrical energy. Speed is how fast a wave can be propagated. The length of the wave determines the distance the photon has to travel in order to propagate a new photon. When you move away from the propagating source, the photon has a longer distance to travel. When you move towards the source, the photon has less distance. Time-dilation is the effect of your speed by Y and the photons speed being X with respect to the motion of travel. If one person is standing still, throwing balls at a target moving away, the ball takes longer to reach its target. For some unknown reason, maybe it's because the target is a counter, this fundamental aspect of physics has become known as time-dilation. If you move a block further away from work, is that called time-dilation because it takes no longer to get to work. How about moving away from a broadcast radio station? When dealing with the speed of light, you are dealing with the time-dilation of information. Your actual time is still progressing at 1 second per second. Since the laws of physics are equally valid in all frames of reference, acceleration in space (change in spatial coordinates) also causes and acceleration in time event. How much acceleration is determined by the mitigating factors. The cesium-133 atom of the atomic clock is chilled to absolute zero to prevent it from being accelerated in time when a force is applied. This makes the clock an instrument for measuring acceleration in the Space frame. Acceleration in the Time frame will vary based on the force being applied to that frame of reference and how the mass of that frame reacts. The denser the mass is, the more force is required to accelerate it in time, time being converted back to and from radiant energy. E=mc. Atomic energy is converted to radiant with acceleration. F=ma primarily deals with acceleration in space. E=mc, acceleration in time -> change in the structure of the mass. Mass can be radiant energy (electromagnetic waves), Atomic energy (animal, mineral, vegetable) or information (body of knowledge knowledge). Electromagnetic waves are force carriers. What do they carry? Information. F=ma. Force equals Acceleration The fundamental law of the universe. If you understand that, then you understand the universe.

[@debiddo]

I had struggled with this for years, despite being a physicist and engineer. The problem is that the thought experiments on this topic are fallible in many ways, if taken too literally. [For example, what if the clock tower was on a train moving away at the speed of light from a stationary observer, or if the observer was on a train that started on an approach to the clock tower, then continued past at the speed of light?] For me it took a completely different perspective to understand it, building it up in stages: 1) If every particle in the universe was static with respect to each other, there would be no interactions, and it would seem time had stood still, because nothing is changing. For time to become apparent, particles need to move and interact with each other, energy has to flow. 2) The speed of light is a universal constant. Do not consider light as an object, like a ball moving through space. It is a limit on how fast events in one region of space can cause events in other regions of space ("causality"). 3) If you were travelling at the speed of light, the atoms and particles that make up your body would not be able to move in the direction of travel (relative to the centre of your body), since they would have to travel faster than the speed of light (violating causality...the outermost molecules of your body would arrive at your destination slightly before you should be able to arrive!). Hence all the particles in your body would actually be static relative to each other, and therefore you wouldn't be ageing. Furthermore, you wouldn't be able to have a conscious appreciation that your ageing had ceased, since even "thinking" would require movement and interaction between the particles in your brain. 4) Since any object's perception of time is relative to the "relative interactions" of the matter it is made from, it cannot perceive the difference between a tick (at zero speed) or a tick (at near the speed of light....a "tick" is a "tick" according to the object observing or recording its own time. Due to the principles of a universal speed of light and causality, moving through space will necessarily slow the mechanism of the moving clock, and by an equal amount, the mechanism by which the moving observer is able to observe the clock. A clock moving through space actually does tick slower than a clock not moving through space. [A profound thought regarding point (2): If the speed of light is measured by causality, and causality infers change, and change infers the passing of time....if time didn't exist, would there be a speed of light? Would there be light?] In the context of this perspective I can go back to the original thought experiments and understand which aspects of them are useful in deriving the maths. These are all my own thoughts. I don't know if any professor of physics would validate them. But where the original thought experiments left me feeling dissatisfied, this new perspective helped me.

[@ayesha1929]

I am going to pretend i understood that

[@death2denemy]

@@ayesha1929 lol.. I can relate very much to your pain..😅

[@thewindgamer2607]

.

[@bryllejustinreforma9878]

Ur smart i like you

[@kt420ish]

My question to someone who understands time dilation and speed of light is...photons move at a constant speed, no matter how fast the observer is traveling. Light still travels at 186,000 miles per second. So what if I'm moving at the speed of light, and I shoot a photon from a flashlight. Are me and the photon traveling at the same speed side by side. Or does the photon shoot off at the speed of light? Well it can't because then it would be going twice the speed of light to someone stationary. So I assume if I emit a photon while I'm traveling at light speed, then the photon would look stationary to me

[@Minimanemohahaha]

Time dilatation is when the alarm rings 7am, u wake up and blink your eyes for half second, and its already 730am

[@MrJoeyplatinum]

Will it all remain the same??

[@mustafaalio6385]

You mean 7:30 p.m

[@michaelsteiner5265]

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

[@noryydamac7766]

Ron Ng lmao😂😂😂😂

[@junnaviracaza4244]

True hahaha

[@brhilb1882]

Anyone else not here from school and just interested in spacetime??? Edit: thank you guys so much for 5k!!

[@Ivessssssss]

Meee i'm very much curious about time dilation

[@noahhecker6672]

Both

[@shego4617]

i randomly got curious about it and looked it up

[@robertochoa2378]

I'm just high asfuck

[@samuelcid1726]

Same

[@STREETFOODJOURNEY5]

now i know why i am not smart at school way back then, even now i still dun understand after watching this video 😂

[@youyoutwotwo]

This wasn't a very good video, so don't blame yourself. You need something a bit more complete and better organized. This video is just giving some thumb nail sketches of the basic points.

[@keimoji]

It basically means the faster you move in space the time goes slower (in your perspective) but outside the slower they move in space the faster time goes for you. So like there's twin babies, the baby #1 is on earth and the baby #2 is in space, the baby is travelling in 99.9% light speed and they reached their destination and he still a baby, but the baby on earth is now a full grown man

[@Shvetsario]

@@keimoji I get the speed relativity but how does that affect aging or time? Like if there's 2 people, one on Earth or in a certain point in space. Person 2 wants to travel to another point, and it is exactly 1 light year away from person 1. So it takes 1 year to get there at the speed of light. Then person 2 goes back to person 1, so another light year. That's 2 years that should have passed, for both. Yes, person 2 will see that everything is slower, but that's only relative. Ageing and metabolism wouldn't change, so I don't get how 2 would have aged slower.

[@theintegratedguy9528]

The fact that Einstein thought about this experiment and could accurately predict it’s result without even knowing what would happen is astounding If he was alive now,he could probably accurately predict what is inside a black hole and what would happen to human in it😢

[@swamhtet1070]

Cop: “Do you know how fast you’re going?” Einstein: “Speed is relative officer”

[@askingwhyisfree7436]

but you have speedometer.

[@penus7639]

Asking Why is Free you mean time compressor?

[@SCP3017-1]

Cop: ok you're free to go *starts running in opposite direction* God: you're fast af bois, you both have no idea... how fast you really are

[@adityavishwajitsingh1052]

Heisenberg: I don't know my current speed but i know currently where I am

[@laurasanchez7105]

"If you were behind me, I was going exactly 0 mph"

[@user-zz5dv8tq1d]

Einstein travelled home by a tram That's all i understood

[@wibaswibas92]

ha ha ha

[@softdrink-0]

I only understood the bowling ball and the marble

[@Shadoefax760]

Lol I understood the video was about Einstein and nothing more

[@shivamgarg5655]

booyeah.

[@basicallyv9873]

Hahaha!!!

[@brekerickson9664]

A long long time ago, I remember being told in the 5th grade of the 3 dimensions and then hearing my teacher say "some people even say there is a 4th dimension". On the way home I told my dad, "If the first dimension is height. Then length, then width....then the 4th dimension has to be when that object exsisted.". So I like to tell myself I theorized space-time as a child. (I mean, not really but close enough lol)

[@ceylongamersleague9733]

That is nice. when he traveled away from the clock tower at the speed of light the clock stopped. Then you must realize that is cus of the light waves emitted from the clock would not reach him cus he is also traveling at the same speed. so he will only see a snapshot. then how he can tell that flow of his time slowed down by that experiment according to this video?

[@ronycb7168]

@@ceylongamersleague9733 Its all a matter of different frames (of reference), to someone inside a bus, he isn't moving so he he sees himself at x=0 (the orgin) always. So to him time is/appears slowed down but to the res of the world, time passes at its normal rate. Also he observes things outside of his stationary frame, ie not stationary wrt to him/his fram, to be of shorter lengths than the world around him, starionary to everyone else and where he seems to be moving at relativistic speeds x approaching c the universal speed limit, 299 792 458m/s

[@Sophistigrace]

I feel like giving you a hug. Not many children have this authentic zest for science. Children are so special they should be exposed to more science in their lives, they’re little geniuses and they don’t even know it.

[@arishemthejudge6780]

Because it was theorized that speed of light always remains constant, even in a relative frame. If you travelled at say 50% the speed of light and cast a beam in front of you, light would still appear to go at 3×10⁸ ms in front of you. This is what was contradicting Newton's laws of motion.

[@RAWRCoding]

If you were to travel towards an observer/object, the time dilation effect would be the same as if you were moving away from the observer. In other words, the time dilation effect is symmetrical, and it does not matter whether you are moving towards or away from the observer. The only thing that matters is the relative velocity and gravitational potential between the two objects. For example, if you were on a rocket ship traveling towards an observer at a high speed, the time dilation effect would be the same as if you were on a rocket ship moving away from the observer at the same speed. In both cases, time would appear to pass more slowly for you compared to the observer, due to the difference in relative velocity and gravitational potential.

[@maximegr3992]

The first equation for velocity in relative intertial frames were actually not discovered by Einstein but by Galileo. Loved the video very clear !

[@johndurrer7869]

Well to be fair God was first

[@wrpg9955]

​@@johndurrer7869lunatic

[@adebesinjacob8311]

​@@johndurrer7869 lol

[@naveedahmad6728]

Einstein: Want to hear a joke? Me: Of course Einstein: Time Me: I don't get it Einstein: Exactly.

[@johnarthurflores3098]

Naveed Ahmad thats why time doesnt exist

[@JuanLopez-he2nc]

I don’t get it ❔

[@spiderjerusalem4009]

Time = joke

[@ieiri7766]

@@johnarthurflores3098 time exists but at the same time doesn't, people just needed to come up with what to call the progression that's happening in space also feel free to whoosh me

[@natanyakharat536]

002 wait since when does time not exist? 😅😅

[@proudtobebrown6475]

Let's just acknowledge how all of his theories were "imagined" before he proved them

[@soundsofcompany3280]

Really fascinating. One thing I personally find interesting is the discussion of time relativity in the Quran, which was revealed about 1400 years ago. It discusses, for example, how time is experienced differently in the different ‘skies’ or ‘dimensions’ of the universe. It’s mentioned that there are 7 such ‘skies’ or ‘dimensions’ (in fact - we’re told the observable stars belong to only the first sky/dimension). For example, one verse translates roughly to: “He arranges [each] matter from the heaven to the earth; then it will ascend to Him in a Day, the extent of which is a thousand years of those which you count.” [32:5] I find it very interesting, especially given it was revealed about 1400 years ago :) If you’re interested in learning more don’t hesitate to ask.

[@kashka6488]

he is the all time genius

[@enjie3061]

@@soundsofcompany3280 hey, may I know where are you from?

[@soundsofcompany3280]

@@enjie3061 Canada :)

[@enjie3061]

@@soundsofcompany3280 I see. Are you Muslim?

[@jesusbermudez6775]

Thanks, gradually after watching these extremely useful videos a few times, I am beginning to understand these concepts of time dilation and Einstein's theory of relativity.

[@HappyKawinnnn]

Why I still don’t understand 😢

[@jesusbermudez6775]

@@HappyKawinnnn I never said I understood completely, I only said I am beginning to understand. So we are in the same boat.

[@HappyKawinnnn]

@@jesusbermudez6775 ahhh thanks bro. appreciated! 😂

[@ryaneverett8375]

It takes such an incredible imagination and fantastic ideas to derive this. To take such leaps and bounds in thought. I would love to have his brain for a day and just experience his perception, etc.

[@justsaying1460]

Teacher: why are you late Student: i'm not late, its time dillation

[@elanavotale663]

LOL.

[@geethanjalibalaji5232]

Best joke .

[@strictly4passion]

"Okey get in"🤦

[@Smokin4CHRIST]

Ha ha then watch teachers pupils (eyes) dilate

[@anassattik2987]

You mad my day lolll

[@katrina5683]

I’m going to need this dumbed down even more

[@internetsummoner]

Katrina D haha same !!

[@hhhector90]

lmao

[@jacobh869]

Same here

[@YusafAnimations]

Well dang

[@severus8443]

What I understood is that the faster you move the slower time is for you, the more sever the gravity of a planet the slower time is, that’s it for me 😂

[@cali_shubh]

you explained really nicely i had to watch many videos to understaand time dilation but this is the best one

[@nilotpolbarman3162]

The animation is so good . Good work man 💓

[@chanasiegel2706]

Me falling out of an airplane: AHHHHHHHHHHH! Einstein: Notice how his photon clock is creating a triangular shape due to the stretching the duration of a second.

[@ni2554]

Omd i can imagine lmao

[@xianthegaian4060]

Report Card:. E

[@ShadyRonin]

I was wondering if anyone else thought this video was absurd hahaha

[@kandicescalf]

lol I just cackled

[@therealharshil3437]

funny guy LMAO

[@atharva302]

" Teachers who make physics boring are not teachers , they are criminals " - Sir Walter lewin

[@manyadas4624]

Wish my physics teacher knew this one.....I would never let anyone bail her

[@mindhealer7723]

I love him.. Sir Walter

[@mitchbrown9771]

Walter white

[@ahpstudiostamil]

Time dilation has no significance for time travel in physical plane. It actually indicates the depth of space-time while observation made on speed of light is a projection at the surface. And time dilation said to be due to gravitation is also not true, it indicates the difference in levels of crests and troughs along the surface of space-time. Have published "New study of Gravitation and Fundamental theory of Singularity" [Volme 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - ARC JOURNALS - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. Series of papers (totally - 9 nos.) on ""Theory of Singularity" - The new study hope to serve one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics... 1) New representation of Gravitation 2) Structure of black holes 3) Finite structure of space-time. 4) Real dimensions of space-time 5) Singularity 6) Source of dark energy...etc FYI, thanks.

[@user-ur8ed2vl7b]

And Einstein was their leader.

[@ammonlu8566]

Amazing stuff; the moment I learnt the speed of light is not about light, but causality, I started to understand causality probably dictates all the experience of space and time we have; and it makes sense (causality is so fundamental; like something needs to actually happen before you see it happens, there’s no way around it); I would even think causality would REQUIRE the universe to exist and exist in the exact way we see; hope some great minds can resolve this

[@draco-vf7re]

can you explain it briefly?

[@vicentetrompieri]

Einstein’s Relativity Theory briefly explained. In nature there’s no instantaneous interactions, therefore must have exist some velocity limit, which is the speed of light, which is invariant to the the different inertial frames of reference, that’s the key, hence the dilatation of time and contraction of space observed by those observers in those different inertial frames of reference one in relation to the other using the speed of light as a measurement’s instrument. Q. E. D.

[@martincornel6590]

"Your head is slightly older than your feet" Me: Because my head came out first! Duh!

[@riezzelable]

Unless you're breech

[@chinline1289]

People born feet first: _sad noises_

[@snehank3965]

damnnnnn

[@markfoster1520]

No; your feet are closer to the center of the earth! Mine...about 5 ft 4in closer. 'Course....if you lay down a lot.....

[@garfieldsmith332]

"I am as old as my gums, and a bit older than my teeth". Kris Kringle - Miracle On 34th Street.

[@lukhmanthufile]

Imagine the things Einstein would've discovered if he was alive today

[@MrLoowiz]

A mind like Einstein's or literally the over 141 years old Einstein?

[@junii741]

I think he did well even in his own time .. who knows what he would have done today

[@lutfiramly4168]

he will still be experimenting in his thought

[@paoloapacible6664]

hot tub time machine yeehaw

[@rishabhsharma3213]

Lukhman Thufile he’d making tik tok

[@longducktoe8720]

this video is insane it answered lots of questions I ask myself.

[@breveennkukan3603]

I finally understand why this is so revolutionary. Great explanation and animation. Depending on your frame of reference, reality is different. Reality is so much more multifaceted than I can have ever thought. What other new discoveries await us?

[@Scienceabc]

Glad you enjoyed it 🙂

[@ilyha6284]

THEORY OF RELATIVITY VERY EASILY EXPLAINED Light Travels at a specific speed. When he watched the clock tower, the light that entered his eyes allowed him to watch the clock so if he travelled at the same speed of light, the light would never catch up to him so he would see the same position in the clock. Credits: Wiktor Kasz (This is a copied comment)

[@ilgimdehaaydn8154]

ILYHA Oh wow, thank you for sharing this cuz i didn't understand it 😂

[@ilyha6284]

@@ilgimdehaaydn8154 dw I can feel the frustration

[@viayamayabohang1777]

Well that was so much simplified. Thank you

[@hybmnzz2658]

Even if special relativity did not exist this would be true. This is just the neurological effect. Special relativity is different.

[@AydinGokce9000]

You misunderstand

[@robj7481]

It has always blown my mind thinking that “time” isn’t an abstract concept, but an actual real physical thing that can be influenced by motion and gravity.

[@mcsmash4905]

all i know is that for me time litteraly never flew , until 2020 but then again slept thru the entire year so i can explain it away

[@josephsharp9939]

That’s the kicker. Once you realize that space and time are things, a lot changes.

[@brontehauptmann4217]

@@josephsharp9939 yes you lose your connection to reality and you'll believe anything at that point, except the Bible.

[@josephsharp9939]

You’re right, because an invisible sky daddy who loves you but will burn you forever if you don’t love him back makes a lot more sense than general relativity.

[@josephsharp9939]

Or if I allowed relativity to shape my metaphysical understanding j could be lead to believe that the human race descended from the incestuous union of eight people after they got off the ark.

[@spadebraithwaite1762]

I was a science teacher in Middle Schools. I'm glad that I half-way understood the theory of relativity before I watched this, because it didn't become any clearer from watching it.

[@GfoxSim]

This is so true and relatable. If you move faster through space, time slows down for you. If you move slowly, time goes faster. The proof is when I am late for work, time goes annoyingly faster for me.

[@n1c98]

This channel is perfect. No music in the background, so I can perfectly listen without distractions. In the description is all authoritative academic sources.

[@ConfectionerCat]

AND IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIAA-IIIII

[@MrJollyBear]

@siddharthsriram2685Earth’s gravity is so tiny that it doesn’t affect time that much… relative to other celestial bodies.

[@sammyd7857]

@siddharthsriram2685 time is the same where ever you are and how ever fast you are travelling, unless there are electromagnetic fields that might affect an electric clock and thus time might slow down or speed up

[@mogusmonroe9431]

Can someone suggest another video that is even more simplified than this? Like really simplified. Kind of like a coloring book version.

[@wizardboy2406]

ikr i need one

[@SuperMrBentley]

Read Space time continuum for dummies xD

[@themagicman6965]

Forget it. I watched several videos over and over again and talked to physicists, the time dellation will not be understood by my brain.

[@yapyyapo]

it's not for yer every day Damien, sorry.

[@jakemellin6857]

@@SuperMrBentley Zoltan!

[@codbuild101]

Who else finds this completely fascinating? I have never learned about time dilation in school. It makes it so interesting.

[@stewiesaidthat]

Special Relativity/Time-dilation isn't taught in school because it's science fiction.

[@aviationdylan3353]

Yes it’s amazing especially after watching interstellar

[@jesusbermudez6775]

I have seen this video quite a few times and I am beginning to understand these concepts. I am not fully there yet. Thank you for the video.

[@phlexwoo3122]

"7 years per hour here, let's make it count!' gets crushed by waves.

[@bibfortunatv9303]

“Case and tars drive off” Have gay robot Botsex

[@1989nirankarsingh]

@@bibfortunatv9303 ...and repopulate earth

[@jaredchampagne2752]

Hahaha that is awesome!

[@moexilla]

No time for caution.

[@esshyy]

Wait you talkin about the movie Interstellar??

[@blu9168]

police: *you are speeding* me: *no, I'm at rest w.r.t myself*

[@jimitSoni]

Your velocity shouldn't be measured wrt yourself. It might be wrt your clothes... if you're wearing any

[@jondahldavis2862]

There was a guy who told the judge that he was mislead when he went through the red stoplight. His speed caused the yellow light to look green due to Doppler shift. The judge dropped the red light violation and fined him for speeding.

[@nigels9077]

wrt my car

[@ashwin3387]

That's preposterous

[@lly_09]

You've no case against this dude, cop..

[@howtocookazombie]

7:20 Very nice animation! It shows nicely why the speed needs more time to bounce between the two borders despite moving at the same speed at for the other two observers - because it need a longer way. But I wish this animation would also explain why time runs also slower for the man on the hill and the man in the UFO from the perspective of the falling man. Because if we switch to the perspective of the falling / moving man, then from his perspective his own light bounce runs at a normal time, but if he looks at the man on the hill or the man in the UFO, then they also seem to movie slower (or their light bounce devices in this case). I always though that from the perspective of someone who is moving faster, everything from his point of view and "outside" of his sphere (like the two other people) would actually move faster and not slower too, since this would be the logical consequence. But apperently I'm wrong as I learned. I still try to understand why. It also kinda contradicts what is sometimes said by other sources or movies, like Interstellar. When they were on this water planet, from their point of view their own time ran at a normal speed but the rest of the universe (including Earth and humans) ran faster through time. But from the point of view of the rest of the universe, everything ran slower on the planet. Everybody says something contradicting. What's correct now? If I move in my spaceship close to the speed of light through the space and I watch outside the window of my spaceship to planet Earth, would I see everybody else moving like in a timelapse very fast or would they move slower like in a slowmotion from my point of view?

[@silverrahul]

In ship's frame, earthlings would be moving slower.

[@jesusbermudez6775]

This is quite a good video on this topic. So far I have understood that there is a contradiction in Newton's laws of motions that state that the speed of objects is relative and that the speed of light is an exception to this because the speed of light is constant regardless of where are observing it from. So Einstein came up with a solution to this. I will see this video again a few more times for me to finally understand this.

[@derekliu7157]

Einstein ponders the truths of the universe in his free time. I think about what I'm having for lunch during mine.

[@user-vo8lm4le9o]

True😂😂mee too.

[@vegardpig8634]

He’s dead though

[@constracted7331]

@tommy cane115 Actually it has already been proved by the equation of gravity that scientists use to calculate the force of gravity: Rμν=-1/2Rgμν=8πGTμν

[@narendrasinghrawat3897]

I'm about my dinner

[@jonathanrobertson3406]

I feel like there is a Chuck Norris joke in there somewhere. ;P

[@muhammadseleem9418]

-Narrator: meters... kilometers -Americans have left the chat

[@stephenpaulpower694]

? 670

[@dailychallenger3206]

😂😂

[@zachstine6373]

A meter is about 3.2 feet so that means a kilometer is about 3,200 feet. Not that hard to understand

[@mexicadan]

😂

[@gobimurugesan2411]

@@zachstine6373 3 point 28

[@kaa478]

"Your head is slighlty older than your feet" left me dumbfounded

[@meharbob]

Each time I re-watch it, I learn something new

[@zixenop8372]

Science is interesting.

[@Lovewilayah]

Ok

[@justlikeyou3989]

Bar ......😁❤️👍👍

[@Chase_baker_1996]

And fun

[@TheChadManry]

Verily so!

[@swastikasinha.2004]

Sure it is.

[@gru271]

Maybe someday I'll be able to understand the whole of this video

[@TheAcurapassion]

The theory it self makes no sense, it's not logical.

[@jomarve275]

If you can think it, you can do it

[@diphenhydramine6072]

@@TheAcurapassion Don't say that till you study it. Personally it makes a lot of sense to me because I've been studying it for a while.

[@diphenhydramine6072]

@@TheAcurapassion it's like you're a whale listening to a tiger explain the jungle. Say the jungle is illogical once you go there.

[@omereren7382]

@@diphenhydramine6072 Then please answer this question. I understand that for a person who is travelling at the speed of light away from the clock, it would seem that the clock is not moving. But let's assume that the same person travels to a fixed point and then starts to return to the clock at the same speed. Then the clock would move at twice its normal speed. Does this mean for that person time moves twice as fast too?

[@professormikeoxlong]

The thought experiment you mention in the beginning could also be explained like this - since he's moving at the speed of light, the light that repelled from the clock to his eyes is traveling at the same speed as he is

[@jseb4025]

Thank you for this. I was already confused. Why? Why does the clock appear to freeze? You answered that perfectly. Silly of the video to assume that would be understood with no prior education on physics.

[@REYDilaty]

Majesty:: Time. ??? Old watches time. 1800 Old watches 30minets =1900 New watches 60Minets .. if you have old watches time. Let it show you. Old watches work exactly 30minets = 60 minets new watches .Are we Ocupaited from Aliens 👽??? And we didn’t know!!😮 😂 !!

[@Aserve1st]

Gotta love Physics. It’s fascinating once u understand it.

[@entity5279]

what makes physics even more fascinating is that we ourselves probably dont understand even the pinpoint of what it really is. it's caused me to think, what if aliens have much more advanced tech such as being able to move and stop at incredible speeds without inertia affecting them because they have a much better understanding of the laws of physics than we do? what if inertia is a law of physics we can somehow completely ignore?

[@zx3215]

@@entity5279 not a good idea to ignore some laws of physics. Watcha gonna do when the physics cops come for you?

[@misheo9552]

@@entity5279 my thought exactly, we really dont know everything. But i do believe humans will evolve and become those “aliens” someday

[@cicciobalthasar9154]

I don't get it 😭

[@josoffat7649]

That's a bold statement. I suggest God is the only one that fully understands physics 😁The more I understand, the more I started to see the infinite power of God. Strange how I found faith through science.

[@alafianantik5697]

Me: Watching this video My brain cells: Am I a joke to you?

[@Scienceabc]

Nice one, my good sir!

[@lc1777]

@@Scienceabc special relativity is easy to understand but general relativity is hell difficult for a 8th grade student like me

[@minimatt4921]

@@lc1777 same bro

[@kellypierce4762]

My brain cells said " jello" 😭😭😭

[@Rock_Girl_Daze]

🤣

[@arundeeplotus4539]

at 1:13 when Einstein is watching the clock by moving with a speed of light, the time at the clock is actually changing there, but the old light ray is still moving into space taking long way if he travels with speed of light. so the time in the clock tower and the time (in einstein's watch) would be same at any give movement. But if any one calls by phone and say the time, the phone signal would take the time which light takes. so, even then he would not be conveying the exact time. but if (just imagine) one can make phone call which gives information instataneously with infinite speed (which is not practically possible), then the exact time can be conveyed to einstein by phone. then there will be no dilaltion. the time dilation is felt because of speed of light. also at 4:00, the man on the train going at the speed of light, it is told that the time is slowed down for him. if there is a blind man on train, does it mean that there is no lightning strike for him? it's not for Einstein or for man on the train, the happened event is at exactly same time. it's not that time is slowed down for him, light ray is quick on him. at 7:12, for the man on the hill, the photon clock (on the man falling from a height) will actually look moving slightly fast to complete the strike in 1 second. it won't slow down for any one. the example is like watching the Television and moving to the corner and expect to stay away from the gaze of the anchor (which is not possible). time dilation concept is not convincing. I feel it's light dilation..!

[@aiueokaya]

I've watched this many times yet still my mind can't wrap around the idea of slowing time.

[@Kaymen1980]

Is there a children’s version of this that I can watch 😂

[@tonmoydeka7319]

Hoho hahah

[@cheesywiz9443]

this is the children's version .... you don't want to see the technical explanation xD

[@Kaymen1980]

Cheesy wiz I’m just gonna give up and get into creationism.. All this thinking hurts my brain movie 😞

[@a_random_person5651]

J Ovesen takes time man. Takes time

[@mymail4967]

assume that youre driving a car which is going at 40kmpr to you it will feel the same as taking a walk opposed to a person who is just crossing the road

[@mistersaur]

Conclusion... Your head is slightly older than your feet.

[@ullthuparanjal5318]

No . These are due to the mistake in thinking.,..

[@lordgainz5192]

@@ullthuparanjal5318 I'm guessing you never heard a joke before huh?

[@dr.drakon3928]

🤣🤣

[@Ray2311us]

Quote of the century

[@xplane11fan93]

@binumon b it's a joke!!

[@DharmendraKumar-me2my]

Thanks for explaining.I was also thinking about time dilation before I watched this video

[@niallhamblin]

Subject: Elimination of leap years, days, and seconds under base-375 numerical system :) Would a year with 4140 days eliminate leap years, leap seconds and leap days in a base-375 system? If so what would it look like? If not how would the leap days apply? ChatGPT A year with 4,140 days in a base-375 calendar system would indeed eliminate the need for leap years, leap seconds, and leap days, as it's a multiple of 375 (375 x 11 = 4,125). This makes the calendar very regular, with each year consisting of 11 months of 375 "days" each. In this scenario, there would be no need for leap years or leap seconds because the calendar's year length is a multiple of the base unit (375) and doesn't deviate from it. So, in your base-375 calendar system with 4,140-day years: Each regular year consists of 4,140 "days." There are no leap years, leap seconds, or leap days necessary because the year length is an integral multiple of the base unit. This approach would create a calendar system that eliminates the complexities of leap years, leap seconds, and leap days, making it very regular and easy to work with. It would be a simple and consistent way to measure time in a base-375 system.

[@DJAtom]

I don’t know why i keep watching these science videos, but i must admit they are fascinating!

[@welmoedkuit9032]

probably because you find them fascinating

[@user-yt2jc6yq2b]

I know! Than I can be smarter than kids lol

[@jeetendrasingh2770]

Because truth is stranger than fiction

[@ullthuparanjal5318]

When u come to the truth....u r enjoying this wonderful world

[@elanavotale663]

I wonder too. But then I am happy I learned one ore thing today.

[@god3597]

Traffic police officer - you were over speeding . Me - but speed is relative.

[@AndT101]

Velocity not speed. Speed is a scalar quantity and does not have a direction.

[@codmlover6008]

And you go to jail

[@abcdwxyz3819]

@@AndT101 speed is also relative...it depends on which frame of reference you are concerned about...i m stationery wrt my surroundings but i m moving wrt to the sun and other planets in the solar system :/

[@kirkleblanc]

Hydro Codone traveling at any speed, go around the world, your velocity is "0" (zero)

[@god3597]

@@AndT101 velocity is also relative

[@neillibertine3044]

Basic tenets of natural philosophy are; 1. Law of entropy is fundamental law and it is unification of gravotational force, electric force, black-body radiation law, divergence law, law of motion, structure of fundamental elements. 2. General theory of relativity and Quantum mechanics are description of phenomenon without entropy or no loss or perpetual motion. They are same and there is no need of reconcilation of these theories. 3. Phenomenon are in classical domain, general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are ideal case and thus not observable. Theory of relativity needs many assumptions which are contradictory or unprovable thus false theory. 4. There are no two types of charge like two types of matter which arises when one solve Laplace's equation, field without source but that lacks time component. In nature only force without energy loss is magnetic force. There is electric force but it like thermodynamic pressure eventually die out. 5. Entropy is decaying of force or ceasing motion. Only way to counter entropy is cyclic or periodic motion that negate volume expansion and restore system but introduce temporal component, frequency. More the frequency more the entropy. 6. Without force there is no continue motion, mechanical force is due to heat and electric due to charge. Conservation of energy is not correct but equality of power as it is product of force applied and rate. Both force and rate can increase entropy but in cyclic only rate.

[@maelle_mtz8236]

a very nice video very helping for me

[@mrmd5922]

I agree

[@maelle_mtz8236]

@@mrmd5922 coooool

[@abdulbasit_64]

"Infact your head is slightly older than your feet" * Me who lies in the bed all day *: 👀

[@MrWizzleTeets]

So are us midgets older or younger than normies?

[@robj7481]

In your case, your head is older than your butt.

[@xianthegaian4060]

Don't sweat it, the whole earth is off its axis supposedly anyway

[@BrandydocMeriabuck]

So your arse is older than your nose?

[@zeirro1570]

Never seen my feet I only know my blankets and my tv

[@tommelli5428]

Is it just me, or did it take 3 hours to watch this 8 minute Video ???

[@Ragebh]

That's the theory of relativity acting 😂😂😂

[@tonycrofts4640]

IT is all relative, who watched it with you? Was it a relative?

[@lin856]

Puff puff pass

[@HLanka]

I'm watching it for 2 days, but yet I didn't get it

[@AhsanAli-np1rb]

you must be moving slower relative to your clock.

[@jbhamm02]

Oh my god that thought experiment regarding Einstein and the clock literally blew my mind. It was like a light bult went off in my head. Wow.

[@whirledpeas3477]

What is a light bult ?

[@jbhamm02]

@@whirledpeas3477 LMAO. Uh I think it's a cross between a light bulb and lightning bolt. Yeah, that's it.

[@rachelcushingweddingvideog6]

Amazing! Finally a video that explains it so I understand! ⭐️

[@Scienceabc]

Glad it was helpful!

[@themagicpotato7997]

everybody gangster till people start moving at the speed of light

[@TheLuxentertainment]

Actually one big flaw about this video is the sentence "The faster you move through space the slower you move through time" and this really confuses most people here cause they get a wrong idea of the concept. Your own time still runs the same for yourself. Only if you compare your own watch to the clock tower you can see the difference and realize that time in your own referential passed slower than the time in the other referential, thus the word "Relativity" cause it's all relative to where you are and how fast you are. So the sentence is not really wrong but it visualizes a wrong idea.

[@jackfrost7943]

the senseful comment i seen so far

[@margor9000]

Referential?

[@speedracer7684]

How can time slow down just by u going fast it remains the same it’s just that u cover more distance

[@aaroncurtis8545]

@@speedracer7684 well, that's what the video is about.

[@michiuno2238]

And who is to say I am moving faster than the clock tower?? The clocktower is moving away from me just as fast as I am moving away from it. Relativity right? I'm only moving away from the clocktower if the frame of reference is the earth surface, but earth and the solar system and the galaxy are moving too. So what if I am compensating some of that movement by moving away from the clocktower? I would be moving slower than the clocktower, so now the clocktower's time should move slower. Who is to say what object moves with what absolute speed when all speed is relative? The explanation is illogical and is not thought through to the end.

[@hosh1313]

1:06 Einstein said that the faster you "move through space" the slower you move through time. All this from the same person that said there is no absolute frame of reference! Any time kept in an inertial frame of reference, with gravitation effects factored in, is a valid time keeper for the entire universe and every single frame of reference in it!

[@thelindayz2087]

Big typo in the subtitles at 2:37, it's speed of light not speed of life. Thank you for correcting it :)

[@cubehipster7160]

Nerd

[@GGMatt]

The one part of this that will never click in my brain is the concept of aging differently based on what speed you are travelling, I've never seen that part of the law explained in a way that makes any logical sense at all.. I understand relativity, I understand that the faster you travel away from something (say, Earth for example) then the slower in time it appears to move, up until you travel at light speed where everything you observe back on earth shall appear to stop in time - I get that no problem. What I don't understand is that surely the moment you travel back towards earth at the speed of light, then wouldn't you just observe everything on earth moving much faster now, therefore technically "undoing" the slowed/stopped time that you previously observed..? How is time dilation anything more than a mere observation, how can it possibly be an absolute change in time if you end up travelling back to where you began your journey? I want to make sense of this and have tried for years but I've never seen or heard an explanation that does it justice.

[@Cucumber-ej1pm]

same

[@laryodaily]

commenting here so I get a notification in case someone posts an answer

[@serdareker7161]

I think it is because you somehow get closer the speed of an unit of time thus,time goes by soo slowly , and space is becoming meaningles compared to people on earth,while everything about space is still same on earth and going on its own pace .For the person on earth to perceive things about space ,there needs to pass more units of time.I hope i could explain what i understood.:)

[@rjoldon6536]

Maybe because light experiences no time, therefore if you are a massless particle going through the universe at the speed of light, you would have to be light. It’s un achievable to weigh and travel that fast otherwise light would be able to go faster then it already does if that makes sense. I’m no expert

[@mohdwaseem7048]

Yes, that makes me frustrated also!

[@airforcetone]

my head is same age as my feet cos I'm always lying down

[@MrSavindrasingh]

If you are laying down on your back then your dick is older than your butt 😂

[@Demitchii]

i can’t 😂

[@dontsubscribeme9547]

Do you all buy this nonsense??

[@airforcetone]

guli yano the theory of relativity? Yeah its a pretty big deal

[@zireael8760]

@@dontsubscribeme9547 just because you don't have the mental capacity to understand it doesn't make the complex theory nonsense

[@neillibertine3044]

Interpretation of solution of schrodinger's equation to a box is similar to cavity resonator for energy and matter interaction. For simplicity assume one dimensional case, particle in a box is equivalent to photon or modes in cavity. Take case of lowest energy having base frequency, higher energy level or states are integral multiple of base or ground energy, harmonic oscillator. Now big question is does a system having fixed dimension and elements like particles could have multiple states possible. Or can system interact with surrounding and goes to lower or higher stable states, where system support standing wave modes or resonance. Resonance is system supporting particular frequency and that depends upon two variables, potential and kinetic. Increasing one is increasing other and this means changing dimension or elements of system. Solution of schrodinger's equation for first state gives one bell shaped probability distribution function which is maximum at centre and sharply decreasing away from centre. It means particle is more probable to found at centre which is obvious as force from both end is equal. Now what is meaning of next state which have two nodes like function which is minimum at centre. First, it is impossible for particle or wave to have another resonant frequency when potential or energy of system is same. Second in a given dimension having same elements, energy remain same. So meaning of second state of a given box should interpreted as a box having two particles having equal ground energy and dimension of a box virtually halved, what does physically mean is not known. This satisfy probability function of position that why it is not find at centre because it become virtual boundary. It is not possible for single particle to double its energy what so ever. Another thing is that by halving dimension increases energy according to quantum mechanics by increasing modes, thus smaller particles in smaller dimension have high energy per mode density or simply high energy. But this is not correct according to basic physical laws or classical mechanics because larger dimensions or bigger particles have more energy and by no way density increases at smaller level, while entropy of smaller is more.

[@zakirhussain-js9ku]

Acceleration decelerates time & deceleration accelerates time. Time is zero at maximum speed & maximum at zero speed. Mass can only accelerate, it slows time. Force can both accelerate & decelerate, it slows & speeds up time respectively. Mass & force are essential to change time speed.

[@meekmeads]

Still doesn't explain why half an hour break is faster than half an hour work!

[@mlgamings6110]

Haha.

[@wbariqProductions]

Working requires movement, therefore time feels slow for the most part. But taking a break doesn't require you to move most of the times, therefore time feels quick.

[@kittymcpaws4862]

yes it doesn't because this is bullshit after all. Time is a perception. What's slowing down or going faster is not time but how you perceive it, the more you are aware the slower it goes, the less you are aware the faster it goes. Time is constant, no past or future exist, there is only now, we are the ones conceptualizing those things in our head. One thing i don't like about this is that they assume that if you move at the speed of light you are fully conscious of all the information you pass through, but in reality you won't see shit.

[@deanasaurs]

It’s relative

[@meekmeads]

@@deanasaurs It's even slower when my relatives are in town -_-'

[@mingyuanjing1886]

"The faster you move in space, the slower you move in time."

[@akimmel6941]

That's not what relativity states. Relativity states that - as one accelerates, time changes. Velocity has nothing to do with it.

[@alexpandorf2267]

This exaggerates it its more of the faster you move the more time you save

[@theboiyoulove5124]

the thing is motion is relative, so the statement should be the faster you move w.r.t an object the slower time is for you w.r.t that object

[@ParallelSync]

That's one way to look like you've aged faster through the future

[@outgrown3094]

@@theboiyoulove5124 bro wrt is with respect to. Why r u writing to again lol

[@mahamkhan6592]

Einstein observed "dilation in time with respect to speed" the faster you travel the slower the clock move. That is simply because then you travel in fractions of second. Its not dilation of time, time is universal whether you travel with speed of light or lie still. For example If I travel with speed of light whether on earth, space or jupiter, fractions of second becomes valuable for me at the same time, fractions of second seems void to you at rest state. Time is "infinite", the faster you travel, the more you travel into time, (only when you take "second" as standard unit of time)

[@vickyinsanity]

Time dilation is a relativity concept. And that’s it. It does not slow down. Even when you travel at the speed of a photon, you only observe the images created by the photons hitting an object. It only appears stationary, but it isn’t. Similarly time appears to slow down, but doesn’t.

[@theotherthrone]

My mind was blown multiple times. I need to spend more of my free time contemplating the truths of the universe.

[@crisxian_g]

For those who didn’t understand shit The faster something moves, the slower time moves, because you’re moving fast enough that you don’t perceive time as everyone else perceives it

[@staneze3972]

the slower it seems to move. the clock and devices we use to measure time are not time themselves. the clock has no effect of the actual passage of things from potential to actual. if you move the clock back 1 hr, nothing happens to the universe, time is still constant. time just is

[@Abodd93]

This is why fat people die earlier. Joggers spend time running so time seems to slow down for them compared to the fat slob sitting in his sofa. And all this time we thought it was the fat that was dangerous.

[@lucifer-mp8fc]

@@staneze3972 So what you mean is time doesnt actually freeze or slow if you move at the speed of light in space, time is constant and its moving at its normal speed, so its a perception thing, when you move at the speed of light new light doesnt enter your eyes for your brain to show the present time on the clock so youre basically seeing the clock freeze, but for someone thats near the clock the clock isnt frozen? But Im curious to know what will happen if the person moving at the speed of light suddenly haults? Will he be living in the past and everyone else on earth in the future?

[@staneze3972]

@@lucifer-mp8fc no he won’t be living in the past or the future . You said it beautifully , light wasn’t reaching his eye because he was moving at the same speed as light . He only becomes aware of what was unable to reach his eye. He’s no different than someone that was asleep and wakes to see all that has changed . See, when people say arrive at the past or future what they also miss is this . Time, space and matter are 3 things that MUST happen at the same Instant. If one lacks then it makes no sense , if no space, where will you put the matter and if no time , when did we become aware of it ? Saying someone arrived at the past, he or she must see what they’ve experienced before and for arriving at the future , there is no such thing as “the future.” Our current choices shape whatever happens later in life.

[@BrandonM10]

@@staneze3972 this is the comment I was looking for!

[@980Daisy4]

Informative! It was easy to understand. Very thank teacher!

[@michaellewis1209]

Einstein's system of equations has an explanation. We just need to be clear on terminology. You said that time dilation and space dilation are related. Can we agree that from a math perspective I can use the term dimention in place of space? If so, then what follows is both simple and elligant. The speed of ime is a constant. Just like speed of light is a constant. We've mesaured the speed of light, by collecting a series of identical measurements over a period of time. Stands to reason that we should be able to measure time by collecting a series of measurements instantaneously. I can only think of one kind of particle that would be distinguishable by a snapshot. That would be light. Time = Dimension Time / Dimension = 1 Change in Time = Change in Dimension Motion can only be detected by a change in time. Einstein's system of equations concludes that when we detect light, we are seeing a particle (or collection of particles) quantum leap. If quantum theory works on the smallest of scale, it stands to reason that it should work on the grandest of scale. Or not. Happy to be proven wrong.

[@renmerkom5576]

Guys I feel sorry to say that 😔 Time is just a concept , created by clock sellers to sell more clocks .

[@PavanSpace]

Lol

[@chanbee5159]

Ikr

[@sumitapaul1379]

Karl Marx

[@youknowwho9203]

That makes more sense 😅

[@samueleric4000]

It's probably the most useful concept ever😒

[@ambitiousmindsofgreatness]

Imagine if someone distracted Einstein while pondering the theory of relativity

[@syedfamily650]

Students bach jaate

[@subhendubhattacharya7473]

@@syedfamily650 Sahi hai yaar

[@therealharshil3437]

punch them

[@outgrown3094]

Probs would of been his wife as payback

[@anirudh2000]

@@syedfamily650 Also we will not have have gps and many more things that are possible. Galti Einstein ki nahi balki hamare schools aur colleges ke sath hai. Jo sab interesting topics ko boring bana dete hai

[@riya.m]

For making it easier to understand, consider yourself waiting for someone for an hour and on the other hand playing video games for an hour....time will be slower and faster respectively in the above cases. It's kinda cool how it's not just your mind which thinks this way but it also is a phenomena which has already been proved. It's crazy how lots of undiscovered phenomenas have already been experienced by our mind at some point.

[@JemRold]

What? That's not how it works. You play video games to waste time. While you're playing, people are doing something productive.

[@riya.m]

@@JemRold well, now that you are pointing it out, i feel like i gave a wrong example...sorry dude. Thanks for pointing it out Although I never thought someone would actually read this..😅🙃

[@bg.complexity..stewfeed.1532]

Here, we talking about the speed of time in which most scientists said is relative. Now let's try to break it dow to small pieces until we reach the whole thing. First we talk about time. It is the the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, or condition exists or continues. A nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which succeed one another from past through present to future. Since the video is talking about time is faster because of difference in gravity, hence supporting the Theory of relativity. The word "Faster" correlates with word "Speed" in which it is measured by the dimensions of distance divided by time. The SI unit of speed is the metre per second (m/s), but the most common unit of speed in everyday usage is the kilometre per hour (km/h) or, in the US and the UK, miles per hour (mph). Therefore, saying that time has it's own speed related to gravity. Is like saying time had travelled from point A to B and had a Velocity. The relation between velocity and time is a simple one during uniformly accelerated, straight-line motion. The longer the acceleration, the greater the change in velocity. Change in velocity is directly proportional to time when acceleration is constant. Therefore saying that time flows faster or slower related to gravity will contradict itself. What you are measuring on this video is the speed of the magnitude not the time itself. You are using atoms, in which gravity has a huge role on it's speed. All matters are affected by gravity. Gravity affects atoms the same way it affects all other matter. Every atom creates its own gravitational field which attracts all other matter in the universe. If you put a lot of atoms together, like in a planet or a star, all of the little gravitational fields add together, creating a much stronger pull. Time is not made of atoms. It's an irreversible force that pushes everything forward. Time is invincible, constant and the foundation of everything. You can refer to it as the source code of everything. Time is "Constant" it cannot be faster or slower since it is the foundation or the determining factor of "Speed". Time is like an infinite straight line that continues to move forward. You cannot bend, rewind or go beyond it. Time is the one that binds everything. It's the only thing in the Universe that cannot be changed. Time will continue no matter what. It is the very definition of Infinite. Time is constant. It can exist with or without gravity. I'm sorry to say this, I don't mean to disrespect sir Albert Einstein but the Theory of relativity cannot exist it is impossible for time to be relative gravity. Speed is the one related to Gravity but not time. Hope you all understand what I am proving here.

[@adityakadam830]

Nobody: Maxwell:enters with a magnet to represent electromagnetism

[@internetexplorer6824]

😂

[@internetexplorer6824]

Fleming joins him with the right hand

[@abhinavsrikarcheruku491]

Usain bolt is the youngest man on earth😂

[@mistuslordus]

Noice 😁

[@adityasehrawat7575]

@Nitesh Kuamar no the new born babies are

[@oberstabsfeldwebeldoge4115]

slowest aging*

[@adityasehrawat7575]

@@oberstabsfeldwebeldoge4115 no sir ur wrong

[@aaaaansh4907]

Not actually becuase he does not run forever

[@colinrickels201]

Right when we thought we understood it near the end, you just had to throw that curveball in there “your head is slightly older than your feet”. . Great vid

[@CrabPeople-Inc.]

But it really isn’t tho yes your feet complete a day faster than your head but time is still a constant

[@andrewbodor4891]

Equivalence of Mass Time Dilation AND Speed Time Dilation By Csaba A. Bodor; March 1, 2022 The twin paradox disappears if viewed in this context. In both the things that are in common are (1) the aether, and; (2) gravity. Baryonic matter, including electromagnetic waves, and the aether cannot mix. The aether is pushed aside by the matter BUT pushes back against the matter in the form of, what we call, gravity. The greater the mass, the greater the push. Even with this push there is a large amount of space between the components of the matter. The push, gravity, however, affects those components by pressing on them and slowing down all the properties of matter. Wave length, frequency, spin, speed of movement, everything. Including time. So, the greater the push back of the aether, the greater the time dilation or slower movement of time. Yes, time is a indirect component of baryonic matter. With speed dilation there are similarities and differences. The, as i said, aether resists change. Matter disrupts the aether's symmetry and the aether fights back with a push. The aether also dislikes matter when the matter pushes against it in the form of motion or speed. Moving matter is like something moving through air or water; both mediums resist the motion. The aether pushes back against the push of matter causing the same disruptions it does with baryonic matter. Everything is slowed down including time. Time dilation, again, comes into being. Gravity comes into being, as with when the mass disrupts the aether. Here it is speed that disrupts the aether and creates gravity, not mass. Time dilation, whether caused by mass or speed, is caused by the gravity created by the aether pressing on "stationary" mass or a moving mass. The time dilation is proportional to the amount and-or speed of the mass. Can speed time dilation and its associated gravity be created artificially? If an element or isotope if an element were to be massive enough AND it could be sped up enough, perhaps. How? Manufacturing such element into a disk that could spin at a high enough speed would not be practical; the centripetal forces and vibrations would probably tear the apparatus apart. What if a sufficiently large amount of such element, however, could be forced to vibrate at a very high frequency? The motion of the protons and neutrons moving and vibrating, even though in extremely small sub atomic distances, might get fast enough to affect the aether inside and outside that element to create the gravity needed to cause time dilation. The frequency would need to be very high. Perhaps such a setup could create speed induced artificial gravity. Bob Lazar, if you read this, hope it helps.

[@Sirebellum1337]

Man, Einstein deserves the reputation as one of the smartest men to live with a theory like this

[@RitikMaurya07]

Ever heard of Tesla

[@Sirebellum1337]

@@RitikMaurya07 that's my point exactly

[@msk871]

Simply I study while running. It gives me more time than my peers. Thats how I always stand first in my class. 😎

[@jadondamiano5821]

This is beyond science

[@muurrarium9460]

Since the ancient greeks debated while walking and even had their teachings and saga's etc. in a certain rythtms so you could memorize them easier when walking, great concept.

[@neillibertine3044]

This is to show difference between classical relativity having galilean transformation and theory of relativity or relativity having lorentz transformation. The wave equation is given by, c² d²/dr² = d²/dt², where c is speed of wave. Its possible solution is sinusoidal function, omitting amplitude and type of function here stating its phase function □ which determine value of wave function at given time and distance coordintaes is, □ = kr - wt Frame S is at rest and S' moving with speed v relative to S. Then solution of wave equation having phase as, □ = kr' - wt', for S'. As phase is constant for wave moving in frame, then for r'1, t'1 and r'2, t'2 phase difference is, □2-□1 = k(r'2-r'1) - w(t'2-t'1) = k◇r' - w◇t'=0 => ◇r'/◇t' = w/k = c' For wave in S' observed by S according to classical relativity, k◇r - w◇t = k(◇r' + v◇t') - k(c' + v)◇t' = 0, where w = kc' and r = r' + vt', t = t' So, ◇r/◇t = ◇r'/◇t' = w/k = c' = c Thus speed of wave in S' observed by S' and S is same according to galilean transformation. Now if phase of wave from moving source S' emitted wave and observed in S is given by, □ = kr - kct = kr - k(c' + v)t, where c = c' + v, according to galilean transformation and c' is speed of wave in S' or with respect to source and c is speed of wave in S or to observer at rest. Thus, w = w' + kv, where w' is frequency of wave emitted from source and w is frequency of wave observed by observer, this is doppler effect. So classical relativity inherently have doppler effect. Now according to theory of relativity having lorentz transformation, phase difference of wave in S' observed by S' is given by, □2 - □1 = k◇r' - w◇t' = 0 ==> ◇r'/◇t' = w/k = c' Phase difference of wave in S' observed by S is given by, k◇r - w◇t = k(◇r' + v◇t') - kc'(◇t' + v◇r'/c²) This shows that speed of wave is not same for both observers and in case of light it is, c = c' - v. For phase difference of wave emitting from moving source S' and observed in S at rest is, k◇r - kc'◇t ==> c = c' Thus wavefront of wave in relative measurement is spherical in classical relativity and elliptical as per theory of relativity. But wavefront of wave for moving source is spherical in theory of relativity and elliptical in classical relativity. Important thing is that due to spherical wavefront inspite of moving source, relative speed doesnt remain constant and heavenly bodies seems receeding. While wave front is elliptical in classical relativity so, speed of source is accounted. Also this is the reason why circular orbit seems elliptical.

[@neillibertine3044]

Speed of light is not invariant for relative motion between source and observer. The relation for relativistic speed of light, c' is given by, c' = c + v cos □ Where c is speed of light relative to source, v is relative speed between source and observer, □ is angle between c and v. According to theory of relativity, two distant events are simultaneous in one frame then other frame also. While from classical relativity two distant events are simultaneous in one frame is non-simultaneous in other.

[@RashmiSingh-zs8uu]

Forget discovering new things, my goal in life is to understand the physics already discovered

[@callmestern]

Same here,🤔 I honestly think there's something missing in this theory. There's something "odd" about it and I'm trying to understand how the math actually came about.

[@woepill]

@@callmestern It doesn't make sense at all, trust your gut. I suggest you to watch Bill Gaede(Physicist Professor of Rational Science), he touches on the definition of "exist" and separates the fine line between OBJECTS and CONCEPTS. Time is a concept, it does NOT exist, Time = comparison of two motions (Seconds, Minutes, Hour is a tick on your watch, the movement of one hand to the other)(Day is full spin of earth) (Year Is orbit around the sun) Concepts are just relations between 2 or more objects. For something to exist it must be an OBJECT, that which has shape and location. Time does not have shape and location, and math physicists treat a clock as the embodiment of time which is totally irrational. If we used an hourglass, which is a clock that works specifically through gravity, it would've showed that its the opposite of what Einstein said he predicted. Its not that the clock is faster out there in space, its quite the opposite it runs slower. And if you take that same clock, and you take it to sea level that clock will run faster because it's closer to gravity and the grains are gonna come out of the little glass container faster. So our clock proves general relativity wrong because it has the opposite effect of what they "predict" as its known. They call it a prediction, well here's a prediction, I'll say that my clock runs faster when its at sea level than out there in the middle of space. In fact if you take it further out not a single grain will fall and according to the lunatics of relativity, they would say that time had stopped because they decide everything by measurement. And now if not a single grain falls because there is no gravity out there they say well time has stopped. That's what they would conclude, that's their rationale, that's the way a mathematician thinks. He says oh it goes slower slower slower, and when it goes out there where there is no gravity they say oh it stopped altogether so now time is no longer flowing or it stopped altogether. 🤦

[@amonray1902]

Einstein loves to imagine. Take your time.

[@idoittinkeringprojects9893]

Dilation of time is real, though confusing. Dilation is detected in satellite systems over gps. However, detected is an anomaly over current belief, that time dilates proportionately at increasing speeds. The contention now is time does not only dilate but also expand. And heres my explaination. Time distortion is essentially due to the phenomenon of the doppler effect. That such is clearly observed over sound, the same rationale can be extended to light. In the doppler phenomenon, the pitch of the sound source is changed to higher or lower as it passes an observer . As like a fire engine, the sound of siren from afar progressively gets higher in pitch as it comes . After passing through, its siren sound gets lower in pitch as it goes . And, the firefighters on board do not hear any difference in siren sound. Such is because, sound waves within the fire engine remain unchanged Sound waves outside of the moving fire engine will distort. Coming Sound waves moving towards the observer compresss. Sound waves moving away expand . With a situation over light, imagine a rocket with a beam of light is approaching a space station , enroute to pass it. The doppler phenomenon will distort the beam of light towards higher frequency , then , after passing the space station , the beam will distort towards lower frequency . The astronaut in the space station will observe a blue shift on the beam of light when its coming towards. And a red shift when its going away. The astronaut in the rocket sees no difference. Then speed of light to all observation positions remain unchanged, while the distances between the rocket (light source) and space station (observer) changes from far to near then to far again. Such suggest time must have distorted to manifest the doppler phenomenon. c = d / t. That c is constant, it should mean when d is shortened, t will reduce proportionately. And certainly too, when d is lengthened, t will increase accordingly. This rationale confirms the distortion of time over movements of time frames relative to each other. However, the distortion is not only confined to dilation but should also include expansion. As the doppler effect exists in sound surroundings, it is suggested, time distortions do occur at such regular circumstances. The distortion of time is not too significant to cause much bother on earthy existence. Its significant over space and accountable when we need to compute consequences of space travel, time frames between planets, between star systems, galaxies etc.

[@u7007317]

3:26: Not clear. What do you mean "the light closer to the man on the train" ? It's all been glossed over.

[@independentvoter2448]

"Yes! Your head is slightly older than your feet" Argh, no wonder my feet takes me to the pub against the better judgment of my head!

[@samueleric4000]

I need to buy you one for this one😂😂

[@osamab814]

Who is acting like he understands but he actually not😂

[@l3gacy]

i mean its not that hard to understand. light is time.

[@23SquareHead]

How could you understand this if you cant even grasp English

[@theprotagonist702]

You told them i like farming

[@wk7049]

Right- it can't be understood- because it is illogical and untrue. It can, however, be memorized and repeated- by those who foolishly think they are smart.

[@wk7049]

@ANDMA Nobody can understand it- because it is a false theory. Only truth and logic can be understood.

[@josoffat7649]

I've experienced time dilation when I did way too many mushrooms. Time would speed up and then slow down a bit like an alternating current. It was really weird, to say the least.

[@alexyssaubrie1606]

That last line is gonna mess with me for a while