Tina Brown on the future of Britain's royals

[@Maddie9185]

I gotta give it to Queen Elizabeth, she is one tough lady.

[@blackqueen164]

Tough from sitting on her bum for 70+ years living off taxpayers dime? Seriously?

[@elainekoop4651]

And classy at the same time!

[@arnoldsanders6878]

Same lady that ran concentration camps in Kenya and was for Apartheid.

[@englishrose7342]

Stop lying.... U must be a H and M fan... they like telling lies aswell...🙄

[@arnoldsanders6878]

@@englishrose7342 = Damn the things are documented. Can't help that you people are brainwashed.

[@kitty6720]

The Queen isn't just the "CEO", she is the Chairman of the Board and CEO in one, if you will.

[@johnstarr2326]

Of course she is..what’s your point, Captain Obvious?!😅. That’s the game! (smh)

[@johnstarr2326]

@@wendygraham6863 This is a public platform which solicits feedback and exposes comments to critique and examination by all. If you have a personal problem with it, you are in the wrong place. Control your triggered emotions and vain pride. Different points of view are here to stay. Get over yourself. You are Not special. As some of the younger people would say, “you feel me” 😂😂😂

[@wendygraham6863]

@@johnstarr2326 oh pkease, really?

[@angelatester2471]

@@wendygraham6863 It's called distraction. The more focus can be made of matters outside of the US, the more what happens inside the US can be .......,,'ignored'? Watergate was a long time ago.

[@Romdormer]

@@angelatester2471 This true ...Prince Andrew has copped the price for Epsteingate and he's a minor player. Takes the focus off Clinton, Gates er al! So convenient!

[@annasamek5179]

I think the producers made a mistake there by saying that after William and Kate's children there will be Harry's turn to succession. That's very unlikely: rather there will be first George and George's children and grandchildren.

[@infantebenji]

exactly if George dont have children, Princess Charlotte children and Louis children will follow not Harry's children

[@patryan1375]

God forbid that the H and M pestilence get anywhere near the UK or the throne. Yuck yuck. We don't want that social climbing gold-digger walking the red carpet and searching for the cameras.

[@MyReptile123]

They are speaking in the present.The children have no children.

[@uwsgrrl2308]

I'm an American & admire & respect HM Queen Elizabeth.

[@jeanmyers1787]

But not the rest 🇬🇧

[@themaskedman221]

Is there anything more pathetic than an American fawning over a British queen.

[@bluemesa9529]

The Queen is the epitome of true feminism.... she’s worked tirelessly and spent her life serving the UK and the Commonwealth. All families have discourse.... and truly....when we know better ... we do better. But after 70 years of service.... she’s allowed to be human... she’s led with dignity... incredible strength and has my utmost respect.

[@vb1816]

Agree. Although the Diana years were hard to swallow, but unfortunately she was the architect of much of her own misery. Her emotional fragility was there for the world to see, including her young sons. If she ever used them as pawns, it’s no wonder Harry has himself sought an emotionally controlling woman. The Royal Family have listened to public sentiment in the intervening years and altered their approach, which has given William and Harry way more freedom than they might otherwise have had. Calling them ‘the firm’ is straight out of Diana’s playbook. The world has moved on. Harry needs to too… maybe he should find a reputable psychologist to help him… better look beyond better up, as qualified, bona fide coaches sign up to a code of ethics by which anyone with actual psychological issues must forwarded to a professional for mental health help. Coaches trying to tackle his issues could be harmful to both him and those whose lives he might impact.

[@MsJones3]

@@vb1816 gurl wat??? Half of the commonwealth lives below the poverty line the other half and hasn’t gotten any better for the other half in the 70 years this feminist has been on the thrown

[@ninjacat4929]

@@MsJones3 Well they are all self governing now and I guarantee things become much worse for their populations when they leave the commonwealth !

[@lekis5975]

@@MsJones3 A feminist who has never employed any woman in a position of power. *ALL her Private Secretaries and Assistant Private Secretaries since 1952 have been MEN.* She only employs women in lowly inconsequential positions. No wonder she stayed making the kind of decisions that neither a mother or grandmother or right thinking mother-in-law would make.

[@MsJones3]

@@ninjacat4929 u would think that after 70 years certain steps should’ve been taken to ensure a better future generations

[@michellewynn6554]

The queen’s father was king and emperor. Now, this is really just great for tourism. Not one country that is “ruled” by this family depends on them for anything in their everyday lives. They all have their own governing bodies, their own military, etc.

[@jeanmyers1787]

Yawn 🇬🇧

[@dantescave1]

France has more tourists, a language barrier, and no monarchy…

[@Loulou-sr3tk]

You are so right. Monarchy still only exist to boost tourism and sale trash papers. Majority of royals are commoners. France get rid of royals centuries ago and Paris is the most popular destination in the world: people continue to visit Versailles etc…

[@Hummingbirds2023]

Queen Elizabeth is dedicated to her position without compromise. I can see she is suffering the loss of her life partner, she has become very frail.

[@johnstarr2326]

The woman is 96yrs old! Get it.

[@ddl639]

The Monarchy has to remain neutral and 'of service' as it represents all of the British people. You can't mix that with Royals being paid to promote their own 'brand' and being paid by USA interests.

[@madwisdom4929]

Isn't the Queen marketing a line of dish soap? Isn't Charles marketing Honors for Citizenship? Isn't Andrew still sleeping with 60+ Teddy Bears? Isn't the British gov. increasing more food banks for their hungry and cold subjects. Isn't the Royals a strain on the economy? etc. Is Charles protecting the Queen from Elder Abuse or is your future Mistress Queen Camilla tired of waiting for her crown? Your hate of Prince Harry is a distraction from realities at home.

[@darlene6531]

The Queen was wise in refusing the half in desire of Harry. Before they married the Queen gave them the option of being non working royals which they declined.

[@lisa408t]

H&M seem to have WAY over played their hand!

[@johnstarr2326]

@@lisa408t Harry and Meghan are Not working Royals. They do Not represent the Crown.

[@johnstarr2326]

The Monarchy has to go! They do Not truly represent the British People in the modern era. They represent their own personal interests under the facade of public service. It’s a brilliant gig!😂😂

[@christineoneill9307]

Believe statistically speaking the crown brings in massively more money than it costs!

[@PutinsMommyNeverHuggedHim]

Exactly. It was a little jarring to suddenly get flashed with those “statistics” out of nowhere, after such a poignant interview. Network executives can’t even read the room anymore

[@mrscitrine3592]

@@michaelsinclair9010 nah.

[@visualdog]

It costs about one pound per person in the UK to maintain the monarchy. What a bargain!!! They stretch that money to entertain all the world's dignitaries throughout the year. They promote charities, acknowledge individual accomplishments, promote UK industry and endeavors. Monarchy's throughout the world unify their countries making them strong and successful. Much to be admired!!!

[@yvettetorres7829]

Is that pound daily, weekly, monthly, yearly. Put it context for us.

[@englishrose7342]

Yearly..

[@angelatester2471]

How much does it cost to run the president, the retired presidents pensions, the campaign trails?

[@Silvercloud-cg7gs]

@@yvettetorres7829 yearly.

[@pamelameadows9717]

I am so glad to finally hear somebody stick up with them I am so sick of the British people talking about being taxpayers and paying for the Royal Family's luxuries. Did they forget that they are extremely wealthy and use their own money for vacations? I am so sick of the British people whining about where their tax dollars are going to link meanwhile they don't realize some might be going to their free healthcare and other things. I only know this because you're not the first person I've come across saying how much of individual tax dollars actually go to the royal family. It's like here in America I am so sick of people getting pulled over by police officers and say and I pay your salary. They're always talking about how their tax dollars pay somebody salary that they're dealing with.

[@jayceewriter7826]

Love the Queen 👑❤️

[@jayceewriter7826]

@@johnstarr2326 leave the planet

[@elisabethpitt6103]

Just as the Queen is a working great-grandmother, so am I but I'm only 84yrs, there must be others doing the same.

[@Smartychase]

Well done mam 👏

[@henrimatisse7481]

And how much wealth does the Queen command? All of it: jewels, property, money. I'll bet it's undiscoverable

[@Lagerfanny-g7e]

The Queen should have all the wealth as she is the most important human being on earth 🌍

[@lewstone5430]

Hong Kong . . . good dog!

[@cherylthomas1268]

Incalculable

[@johnstarr2326]

@@lewstone5430 😂😂👍

[@johnstarr2326]

It is reported that, the Queen’s personal wealth is worth $500M. The Monarchy and it’s properties etc is worth a total of $88B

[@LDNRABIN]

Highly recommend her book The Palace Papers. Riveting.

[@marywhitmore3185]

I don’t recommend it if she is backing up smegs she needs shut done

[@jennifermaharaj3551]

Scandals come and scandals go,the British love their Royal family and the family will survive,the hiccups and aberration are just that,the pomp and pageantry are like no other and will continue to relevant to the British way of life.God save the Queen.

[@doloreswilliams6826]

Will you stop using Megxit. It was coined by a racist in Britain. That's why they like using it.

[@tomandaj1]

I love at the end they say that the royal family cost British citizens 96,000,000 a year. There are 68,207,11 million British citizens as of 2021. That comes out to about 1.41 per person.

[@ge2623]

But they're better than us. God said so.

[@rosg1746]

That calculation is false. Read Norman Baker’s book on royal finances.

[@ge2623]

@@rosg1746 "Royal Finances" I don't rob people, It's my "Finances"

[@Kexgoija]

At least we get a parade for our contributions.

[@Kexgoija]

@@ge2623 Yea, God!!!! Marry your Cousins. Bluer blood!!

[@yvonnemurray5537]

Never ever in my world travels have I ever been more moved than my trip to London. I just felt such a connection wherever I went in England. Also never felt more proud of my American ancestors for fighting to be a free nation. Still doesn’t keep me from feeling a connection to England and the Royals.

[@mrjgray5098]

hello there, how are you doing.

[@basilmarasco1975]

Your American ancestors fought to be a nation in which only male property owners could vote and slavery was allowed. As a woman, you could not have voted, until about 100 years ago.

[@pamelameadows9717]

I don't think the British people have realized yet that a lot of Americans still identify with their ancestors being British Irish and Scottish. Most of us secretly love the queen and are interested in the royal family. Especially anyone who traces their roots. I am 97% Irish 3% British.

[@basilmarasco1975]

@@pamelameadows9717 By "British", you mean English, or Anglo-Saxon, correct?

[@themaskedman221]

@@basilmarasco1975 "British" is a political term that refers to the English, Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish people (in the 19th Century it included all Irish people). It doesn't just refer to the English, while "Anglo-Saxons" were a Medieval tribe and not an accurate way to describe modern English people.

[@joshuakampamba9061]

Long live the Queen!!!🇬🇧🇬🇧🇿🇲🇿🇲

[@tinak6484]

Yes the royal family cost a lot but they bring in much, much more to the UK because they are the reason everyone wants to visit the UK. They are the main tourist draw into London and I heard they bring in over 2 billion in tourism revenue each year. So they are bringing in 20 times as much as they are being paid. Also, the royals pay taxes on their income

[@aprilwearsgucci]

Really?

[@seeyouanon2931]

I think some people forget that all those that work, will only pay £1.30 each and only once a year, and only 15% of that goes towards the queens staff, public duties, upkeep and security etc. The other 75% goes to the government. I also think many forget that the queen and prince Charles and other royals pay taxes on all their private income and private properties the same as all of us, which have nothing to do with the public. Also I think many forget that the royals have jobs outside of royal duties. And they inherited or have stocks or businesses etc.

[@tinak6484]

@@aprilwearsgucci truly. You can google how much money they earn and how much they make for the uk

[@tinak6484]

@@seeyouanon2931 exactly! So will people then decide to get rid of such hardworking, charity driven people like the royals who make the country so much money , when it only costs them about $2 a year.

[@jean12fication]

My trip to the uk had nothing to do with the monarchy. I'm into world history and Bible truth, that is why I visited Greece and other European countries. I also wanted to see the countries that colonized so many black countries and made them think they were during them a favor.

[@jolyfrye1871]

I think I am one of the few Americans, who think the monarchy is quite COOL . . . . 👑

[@SandyWolf-]

I do too!😁🇱🇷👍

[@hazelluke1576]

What is cool about being subservient to a bunch of dysfunctional people who is there through accident of birth Liars Cheaters Adulterers Peado's

[@melissa2688]

@@SandyWolf- include me too! I've been a fan of the RF since I read about HM and her Silver Jubilee as a girl. She is an amazing woman who had amazing parents as well. Take care 🙂

[@amarbaha]

When your ancestors lived in four countries colonized by the British and everytime you see them you see oppression you would change your mind. The palaces they live in were build by slaves, they still are figureheads of dozens of countries around the world, they traded in slaves and reaped the benefit of slavery. Ironically not just Africans, but Indians, South Americans etc.

[@caelidhg6261]

? It's funny. I have family in Canada.. y 80+ year old cousin grew up during WW2 and is very loyal to the Royal family and indeed they did stay by and cared about the "common people" when they were getting blitzed. There is that. I think that from that aspect QE has been careful to navigate that ship but at the same time her SISTER got sidelined hard... It will be interesting as Charles talks about downsizing the royal family.. which is probably a GOOD thing. But ironic that US Citizens are devoted to a Monarchy... they are historical celebrities but I don't give them any power over myself,... that notion is antiquated

[@lynnsmithershubbard1896]

I thought it would be Queen Consort. And the firm is not the royal family...it's the suits who do their advising, etc.

[@RaymondHng]

Yes, Camilla will be queen consort. And Catherine may one day be queen consort as well. Camilla will be officially styled and titled as _Her Majesty The Queen_ as a courtesy title to her husband, _His Majesty The King_ .

[@patryan1375]

Maybe they listen to the advisors which is more than can be said about trump's WH.

[@jangoslin8258]

In all The Monarchy has brought in Billions of pounds in revenue to the british economy, In 2017 alone the Monarchy generated £1.766 billion to the UK economy, The Monarchy pays in far more than they recieve, And if they go , Let the people know it will be them through sky high taxation who will have to foot the bill for the deficit left behind ,

[@johnstarr2326]

Your Economics is flawed. Read Milton Friedman, American Economist. It may add some clarity.

[@ByddinRhyddidCymru]

Bootlicker

[@MTknitter22]

@jan goslin, I don’t like to disappoint but those stats are not as true as they used to be. PARIS generates more income from touristry now than London. It has hurt that many tourists call it londonistan. The actual stats about the good they do or don’t do - we will NEVER see the real figures. Andrew and Fergie, for instance, have shacked up for years at the very large and luxurious Royal Lodge. WE pay for all the servants, gardeners, cooks and maids. Funny how nobody says a word. It takes millions and an army of employees in upkeep to put on the show of the RF. UK has drastically changed in demographics. There is well-founded concern about the Queen’s exit.

[@MTknitter22]

@@johnstarr2326 You must remember we Brits have been told the Monarchy pays for itself for so long that we believe it. “Royal” journalists and press make money & gain access by puffing the family so not much truth - but much gossip comes out of them.

[@yvettetorres7829]

Your monarchy spends far more than it brings in. Your population just hasn't figured it out yet. You're programmed to bow down to the royals as if they're better or more valuable as human beings than anyone else.

[@MrRexvogans]

If Tina Brown really believes that Camilla is now beloved, then I wonder about the accuracy of this book.

[@ninjacat4929]

I believe that with the exception of Andrew all the Royals are appreciated much more when compared to Harry and wife !

[@user-qy9ov2fo2j]

She is paid to say that

[@michaelmulvey6753]

@@ninjacat4929 and why is that? Because they didn’t want to be freeloaders and to make their own way in the world, free from the scrutiny of the tabloids? What’s better? Being a “working royal” and essentially cutting ribbons to open supermarkets? I think William and Kate got a taste of the future in their trip to Central America.

[@ninjacat4929]

How to get a load of money for rubbishing your family , nice work by the dirty duo !

[@sheilaghbrosky4150]

Who is Tina Brown? Where did she come from?

[@davidbarahona5550]

I didn’t think about it like that, William is definitely hurt, Really the only people you have left after your parents is your siblings.

[@TWROC96]

Fortunately, William has a fantastic partner/wife who understands the meaning of duty, service and loyalty to Queen and country. Thank God he was born first.

[@natasharobinson6572]

@@TWROC96 when your queen dies, will the loyalty apply to king Charles

[@lindaiorkyaa3762]

@@TWROC96 As good as Kate seem, she can't play the role of a brother to William, only harry can. There's alot between the brothers that kate can't fill. It will trouble William for life if they don't reconcile

[@AB2B]

@@lindaiorkyaa3762 Reconciling with a brother who has behaved as H has is a double edged sword. You have to decide if reconciling is worth the slicing you will probably receive. When there is also a chance your family will be damaged by that sword again, as well, then you have to choose carefully. Keeping a destructive person out of your life may be heartbreaking, but sometimes you don't have a choice but to walk away.

[@patriciawhitehead4313]

@@lindaiorkyaa3762 Oh come on. Most of us have siblings that we rarely see, because they live in another state or country. We seem to get on just fine.

[@LocustIvy]

Without the RF the UK has no drawing cards.

[@Essemm52]

Then you need to brush up on your history.

[@Silvercloud-cg7gs]

I agree the British Queen is the most famous in the world.

[@r.stevens6205]

Let’s try an experiment and see

[@danbev8542]

I love visiting the U.K. and don’t give a fig for the Monarchy.

[@mrscitrine3592]

@@danbev8542 yeah sure. You probably go to every thing that is there because there is a British monarchy

[@josephinebcmpatrick9207]

Do not inflict your inappropriate words on British Royal Family. They are not CEO's. The Firm means The Royal Family.

[@josephinebcmpatrick9207]

@@michaelsinclair9010 You have misinterpreted my comment. The British Royal Family were Born into their Royalty. They do a lot for different Charities & bring a lot of joy to people's lives. They bring a lot of Revenue to Great Britain. They inspire people of Great Britain to be Patriotic. They do a lot in life, they would perhaps rather not have to do, they realise they have been Called to a life of Service.

[@syreetathibodeaux6114]

Wait… to the woman he was closest too…. She was his mistress! I’m so confused.

[@josieadams3107]

Exactly I wish Queenie would skip Chuckie and hand the ball to William.

[@ninjacat4929]

Yes that's why he ended up marrying her for her calmness and lack of paranoia .He couldn't cope with Diana's stunts !

[@lorrainedsouza443]

@@ninjacat4929 He married Diana to present parents and country with a beautiful lady who wd produce heirs to the throne! Heirs and spares!!

[@josieadams3107]

I feel as if somebody had sat Diana down, and said listen we need you to be a baby maker. But she came from an age where the Cinderella complex was part of her life. She was expecting prince charming and she got Jeffrey Epstein. If her mother or one of her sisters had just told her what her role was going to be, she would have probably found her own lover and led her own life.

[@ninjacat4929]

Charles was sold a bad deal every bit as much as Diana was .She sold herself as loving country pursuits and similar interests as Charles when in fact the opposite proved to be true . She was also very paranoid , needing constant attention and given to erratic behaviour which Charles had no idea how to deal with !

[@rudygong7477]

Disney have the make-believe, the UK have the royal family. The amount taxpayers contributed last year was less than the 98 million. The Queen's revenue, quite considerable, is turned over to treasury, then the working royals get back their expenses from the treasury, including, I believe, the expense of greeting foreign diplomats and government officials. Which are part of the duties of the monarch as Head of State. I always wondered why this give me and then I'll give you back. Is confusing and often use to confuse taxpayers as to how much the royals management makes vs how much truly comes out of the taxpayers pockets. Did I miss something?

[@rudygong7477]

@@michaelsinclair9010 Go on. I didn't ask for no reason. Share your knowledge with us.😎

[@rudygong7477]

@@michaelsinclair9010 In other words you have no clue, but wanted to sound knowledgeable and informed, but it backfired and now you go for mysteriously childish.

[@rudygong7477]

I didn't ask you, therefore you didn't have to answer. The WhatEVer you wrote explains you attitude and your age.

[@tomsdotter3228]

I thought Harry asked to step back and have part-time duties but the family refused his request. They should have accommodated him!

[@cocoaorange1]

That is not how things are done. The Queen is stuck in her ways.

[@lnlywriter9618]

He can't just "pick and choose" what he wants to do. Either he is in or he is out. But the constant whining, crying and wimping around about privacy and how things are in the Monarchy to the press - namely Oprah - didn't help his cause. Don't have too much sympathy for him.

[@SorbusAucubaria]

@@lnlywriter9618 The thing is I don't see nothing wrong for Harry and Meghan to have some say in what sort of endevours they participate within the royal family and that the rest of the time they do their own things. That Harry would have become something like prince Andrew was unfair and even frankly old fashioned. It is unfair to demand that prince Harry and Meghan would just sit doing nothing and then go to some sort of things that the court deemed approriate. Now if that meant that they would not get the same funding as before then that would be approriate. But not to give them some say in what their lives are going to be like, is just cruel demand. Especially when they told for a long time that they were not happy and that things needed to change. I really can't see the harm that the royal family changed the rules and allowed for Harry and Meghan to live their lives, do business and documents and then sometimes represent queen. It likely would have been win win situation. They would only use the royal titles when representing the queen. What i find annoying that even if they cut all funding for Harry, even the security costs etc and removed his titles and royal patronaged , they still seem to expect that Harry would ask permisssion from the palace about what activities he participate. They chose to cut everything so stop complaining. From what I can tell Harry is glad he left RF, but I am sure there is sadness around how things went and because the relationships have fractured. I am pretty sure there is regret on the parts of the RF as well. They both could have handled things better.

[@ninjacat4929]

Sorry we can't have members of the RoyalFamily owned by the like of Netflix and compromising their selves for money , that way lies corruption and promotion of unsuitable subjects and blackmail ! Harry must have known that the Queen could never agree to it !

[@tomsdotter3228]

@@SorbusAucubaria Yes! Well said!

[@samik5755]

Sad thing is - the Queen doesn’t actually make the decisions, it’s the government who tell her what to do.

[@RaymondHng]

It's a constitutional monarchy. The constitution restricts what the monarch can or cannot do.

[@mdmiller1112]

So all this crap about what the QUEEN did to Harry and Meghan IS A LIE!! The garbage about the naming of Harry’s daughter can from THE FIRM, not Elizabeth! Tina Brown and this report are deceitful!! Charles is a self-confessed Tampon King and Camilla really nailed the Queen of tramps role!

[@davidj8658]

What a stupid comment. Of course she doesn’t, and shouldn’t. It’s a democracy not a dictatorship.

[@venetia6296]

Are you sure you understand who her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II is?

[@papillionbella]

QEII may not have decisional abilities within the government, she does confer w/ the PM and advises. The British monarchy tends to be more humanitarian these days then ruler.

[@steveconn]

William will make a fine monarch one day. Military service and concern for the common good.

[@basilmarasco1975]

@@somewheresilverlake Certain democratic republics aren't showing themselves in a becoming light anymore. The U.S. has allowed itself to be allies and trading partners of any country: monarchy, dictatorship, authoritarian state, whatever. So how bad, really, is a monarchy? The typical monarch doesn't have much power anymore anyway.

[@CatHarlem]

If you appreciate the Monarch now, you’re in for a rude awakening when Will becomes King. He’s only interested in the power. He doesn’t care about common good. He told us over a decade ago that he’s not doing half the stuff QE11/Prince Phillip, C&C are doing. He recently stated he was going to dismantle the Prince of Wales, he barely works for his foundation, except to take gov’t donated money and pretend the RF is making a donation. Don’t forget he just told us he was going to dismantle the Prince’s Trust (despite) how many people it helps.

[@johnstarr2326]

@@basilmarasco1975 It’s just business, and securing America’s interests. Don’t get it twisted!😅

[@jazzborah4090]

@@basilmarasco1975 u are right about the U.S on that one. But the U.K isn't any different on that one either so your argument doesn't really make any sense. While I do agree that constitutional monarchy makes for a stable government but there isn't any considerable change in the foreign policy of the U.K due to the existence of the royal family. Infact london in the recent few years have become the playing field of the rich Russian oligarchs and the oil rich sheikhs who are obviously associated with authoritarian regimes. They have become the owners of majority of London's poshest real estate and have become involved in shady business dealings with little intervention from the U.K government. Infact Prince Charle's aides were recently accused of having awarded a Saudi businessman with an honour after he was made to pay thousands of dollars to few of Prince Charle's patronages. And let's not get started on the shady dealings of Prince Andrew and the mind numbingly huge "Hollywood" business deals of the Sussexes. I do admire the Queen as a monarch and as a head of the state but your argument is just baseless if you look at the state of the monarchy today.

[@basilmarasco1975]

@@jazzborah4090 I say that democracy is in a bad and disreputable way and you say the same of monarchy. What is *your* idea of a legitimate and functional system?

[@DanandDonna1]

Not having it with Camilla.

[@Doobydoobydoo1974]

What is the piece of music at 5:23?

[@jbtpa895]

I do not understand why Harry was not treated as his cousins,Zara, Beatrice,Eugenie,Peter. They are part of the Royal family,show up to events when needed. The insult of being the"spare" has to be devastatingly hurtful. You can see the results of that dubious position in Andrew and his behavior,total entitlement without responsibility. That Harry wants a different path is admirable. That his family was unwilling to create a place for him was not.

[@caelidhg6261]

Exactly.. I mean I can honstly see how the Royal support system would be racist. There are a LOT of racists still floating around. They are NOT kind to outsiders and view her as a threat to THEIR Livliehoods... (and they do have livelihoods dependant upon the crown) . Who knows what the advisors to the queen are saying to the frail 96 year old woman.. they have to keep that image up. FOR THEMSELVES.. and that is always the way it has been with the Royal Family. Just listen to Diana's stories.

[@backyardjourneyswithamanda1553]

All children of male children of a monarch has titles. He also was the spare to the future King.

[@dizzykat9524]

Your comment shows how little you understand. Do some research into the status of Peter, Zara and the York sisters.

[@marleneclough3173]

Sugar?

[@Holidaygal]

Princess Anne was the “spare” for the first 10 years of her life as she was born in 1950. Andrew was born in 1960. She seems to have a solid head on her shoulders and dedicated to the Queen and the commonwealth . Andrew was raised knowing Charles would be married and would have children. All Royals are well versed in how the succession works, Andrew was fully aware he would only be the “second in line after Charles” until Charles had children. William 1982 and Harry 1984 were born. Andrew knew by the age of 22 he was moving down the line… entered Britannia Royal Naval College (BRNC), Dartmouth, in 1979 to train as a naval officer, following in his father’s footsteps. Andrew completed the course at BRNC in 1980. He then underwent pilot training in both fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters and received his pilot’s wings in 1981. Andrew retired from the Navy in 2001 Harry was raised in the same manner as Andrew knowing William would marry and have children. Catherine started dating William over 20 years ago (2001) Harry knew when he was 17 his days as “spare” were ending. His schooling was done, he went into the Army just as his Uncle Andrew went into the Navy. It was expected Harry would have a career in the Army for 20+ years. We Haven’t heard George , Charlotte or Louis described as the “spares”. People should Stop with this “spare” business

[@donpeters9849]

No mention of Andrew? Who directed this, the Queen?

[@katherinbusby5294]

Excalty

[@lindabidwell6722]

Just slim things down and keep the rest. England needs them.

[@clovergirlbrinkerhof9739]

Charles will be slimming down...bye Harry, Megnut, Andrew and Fergie!

[@Lagerfanny-g7e]

Constitutional Monarchy is an excellent and stable form of governance.

[@themaskedman221]

lol..the UK is an oddity among civilized Western democracies

[@Lagerfanny-g7e]

@@themaskedman221 Why? The Netherlands, Norway, Denmark etc are are Constitutional Monarchies.

[@Addsy]

Loved that bit at the end! Our Fantastic Monarchy is cheap at half the price compared to most Presidencies including the one in Washington!🤣🤣 again! Do your research darlings🤣🤣🤣

[@journeysintothelight2133]

And they don't mention how much income they bring to the UK, through tourism and other various ways.

[@patriciaschuster1371]

Still beats ol' trumpty dumpty.

[@susannpatton2893]

@@patriciaschuster1371 right

[@johnstarr2326]

@@journeysintothelight2133 Other Countries bring in tourism dollars without a Monarchy. No Excuses!! They don’t love you..you foolll

[@journeysintothelight2133]

@@johnstarr2326 For my entire life (all 64 years) I've lived without a monarchy, I couldn't care less. But just for the sake of an argument, one loves to give their opinion. And so I did. I hear they cost each taxpayer less than 2 GBP per year, I don't find that so much. And where I live a huge percentage of the population work for or live from tourism. BUT this family is a huge advertisement for the country and I think they do well enough for the British to offer some gratitude in exchange. Of course, that's my opinion, and I don't really care if you agree or not.

[@abbypengelly1432]

i think people really need to get over the whole camilla thing, she isn't a bad woman and she has put up and stuck through all the hate she has received... she has proved herself and i think she will be a wonderful consort ❤

[@abbypengelly1432]

@@annesmith6582 you are deluded, diana broke up loads of marriages and SHE destroyed lives... dodi was engaged to be married when she took him, his poor fiance was heart broken , im sure all the wives and children of all the families she broke up were traumatised for YEARS TOO!! just because diana is dead, doesn't make her a saint, nor does it erase the bad things she did... also, harry is a nutcase just like his mother so it says alot about you if you think that behaviour is okay and charles and camila receive lots of people's admiration actually as they do lots of charity work and camila actually hadn't said a bad word about anyone so more people are starting to become fond of her so i think its time you get over it and move on .. p.s. you dont have to write comments like a letter,i know what the date is, this isn't an email

[@glen7318]

@@annesmith6582 So DId Diana destroy teh lives of the wives of the men she had affairs with? Are they undergoing lifelong suffering? Is she never ever ever to be forgiven because she had a few affairs?

[@catblue2857]

She is an adulterer with no morals, dignity nor honor.

[@Addsy]

Never been a fan of Tina Whatever her name is? I do think these American programmes ought to do they're research...but then its America afterall! Bless them they are so quaint!

[@natasharobinson6572]

We don't have a dog in the fight, read your tabloids if you want hate

[@lizhorton5333]

You can watch UK shows and get the real scoop on Royalty. You can’t expect America to know as much about the Monarchy, Nowadays there is KZbin and everything is available world wide. Watch GBNews UK. Look at the Thumbnails and find stuff on Harry and Meghan and you will learn a lot from real royal reporters. Not Hoda or Gayle or OPrah, who don’t have a clue about the Monarchy.

[@hdyu5419]

Great balanced interview!

[@blackqueen164]

LOL!

[@blackqueen164]

@Trinacria Nelcuore You know quite well, so why bother asking🤷🏾‍♀️

[@blackqueen164]

@Trinacria Nelcuore Well you gonna be one today fragile buttercup😅

[@danbev8542]

I’m amazed at all the people who think they know so much more than they do about these people! It’s so easy to judge.

[@joannam.8951]

…As you have just judged. Well done.

[@charlottesmail8376]

I'm sure it would be hard to calculate but I wonder how much money the Monarchy brings the public?

[@sinevins]

Queen Elizabeth is a true warrior! Do I like everything she has done, absolutely not! But she deserves respect as an amazing woman who has done so much for her country.

[@patryan1375]

DragonsWrath. Includung servicing and driving ambulances during the London blitz in WW2 while Philip was fighting in the Royal Navy for the six years of WW2.

[@sinevins]

@@patryan1375 wow didn't know that, mad respect for that

[@meganx6726]

Nobody - even the Queen - deserves respect...one has to EARN it.

[@sinevins]

@@meganx6726 That is the point though! She deserves it, because she has already done so much for her country, etc... so yeah I'd definitely say she's EARNED!! IT!!

[@meganx6726]

@@sinevins Everyone worked in the war effort. She's just as human as anyone else. While she spent most of her days at the ATS training facility...she returned to Windsor Castle each night rather than sleep at the camp with her fellow ATS members...in a nice cushy bed. Just saying...not 100% in there. Sure, she helped as a driver but so did everyone.

[@issae6535]

Harry and Meghan got what they wanted - freedom. They are doing quite well for themselves without the monarch.

[@frisco21]

Well, sort of. They achieved their independence despite several cringey missteps, including a clumsy attempt to monetize Harry's royal title. Bad move.

[@diane4488]

If you are happy, and doing ok, you don't go around telling deliberate, malicious lies about your family, on Oprah. And being the most loathed celebrities in modern history, doesn't exactly epitomise success, to me.

[@Kexgoija]

How can you have Freedom when you are constantly working and aweing the Crowd?

[@semipenguin]

I imagine Charles can restore Harry’s titles once he becomes King. The cost of the monarchy is tiny compared to the money they generate. It would be wise to keep them around for centuries to come.

[@abbypengelly1432]

he can, but i don't think he will

[@savannah1923]

Hope he doesn’t

[@Himmiefan]

Harry still has his titles, even his HRH. He just doesn’t use them in his business dealings, unlike other members of the royal family.

[@lisa408t]

He should NOT allow Harry back into the fold

[@bricktam]

He doesn't even talk to his own son. Once he killed his mother and married his mistress, he wants nothing to do with him.

[@notnek202]

King Charles III, King William V, King George VII, the monarchy is in good hands.

[@johnstarr2326]

Why do you want a Monarchy?! They consider you ‘Commoners’....and your Sons and Daughters are Not worthy to be in any relationship with them.

[@LG-dj9qr]

Yuck

[@RaymondHng]

The monarch gets to choose which regnal name to use. There is a possibility that Charles might choose George as his regnal name to honor his grandfather George VI who was born Albert Frederick Arthur George and was formerly known as The Prince Albert, Duke of York. Thus, Charles Philip Arthur George might be George VII.

[@LG-dj9qr]

@@RaymondHng so what. What nonsense. The world is melting. That family stands for nothing of any importance.

[@RaymondHng]

@@LG-dj9qr I was replying to Kenton202, not to you.

[@texasgal07]

God Save the Queen!!!!!!!!!!!

[@natasharobinson6572]

You know that woman gone die

[@blackqueen164]

Betty is going to need it, her comeuppance will not be pretty, believe me.

[@Kexgoija]

Which One? Male or Female or Other?

[@luismanuel2612]

I like that final twist about how much the royal family cost to British taxpayers. As the British used to say there ain't no such thing as a free lunch... 🙂🥰

[@vickieandrew1010]

Please.. Nutmeg is but a fly in the ointment..albeit a poisonous one...but I think we'll be ok. Lol. 🇬🇧

[@blackqueen164]

Yet you keep stalking her every move, make it make sense deranger🤷🏾‍♀️

[@LG-dj9qr]

Yeah but why are they even still around? They serve no purpose. And yes I know all the words to God Save the Queen.

[@blackqueen164]

@@LG-dj9qr It’s hard speaking logic to sheeple peasants, it’s a sight to behold. Sad…

[@janicepolley7518]

Our beautiful queen Elizabeth the 2nd, has as should have done shows herself as a person who has alienated As

[@tishw4576]

The Royal family is a huge draw for the UK. Seeing them in person was very cool. They pay a lot of their own costs.

[@ge2623]

🤣

[@savannah1923]

True. 1.7 billion pound of profit to the government to be exact. More then pay for themselves

[@Kexgoija]

Especially Diana ....she outdrew each and every....and don't you forget it!

[@tristyevely3798]

They didn't talk about Prince Andrew. I don't blame them really

[@rorysroom9155]

I so related to Tina having her shoe hanging off her foot.

[@eduardoscoz4746]

God save the British Monarchy!

[@paulmackyou9098]

Charles isn't the bad guy in the Diana story. If he was allowed to marry who HE wanted then he, Camilla and Diana would have lived different lives

[@doriwilson6991]

Camilla was married at the time he met Diana. Camilla in a way picked his wife for him. This way she had access to Charles.

[@catblue2857]

You don’t have a clue. Camilla married the man she loved, Andrew Parker-Bowles. She dated Charles to make Andrew jealous because he was always unfaithful and dating Princess Anne.

[@IDGem100]

I do not love The Rottweiler.

[@janepowers6711]

Supposedly Prince William indicated that he will never be king - I think there is a strong possibility that the monarchy will be abolished during Charles’s reign. If that occurs, I feel that William & his family will have a more normal life - they seem to be a loving couple and happy family.

[@garethlock50]

He suggested he may not be Head of the Commonwealth. Simply because it has never been an hereditary position. Charles will be next Head of the Commonwealth because the other member states voted for it to be so, though The Queen did state that she would like it to be so.

[@Lagerfanny-g7e]

Absolute rubbish.

[@Holidaygal]

Where did you ever see or hear such a statement from William. Just fake news. Prince William has said he will be ready to be King after the Queen and his father have finished their days.

[@ME-gz8yi]

@Jane Powers -and if that is to be so it will be a sad loss to UK & its people. The RF is filthy rich. Many of the wealthiest in society prefer to be invisible. The RF *chooses* to make public appearances to endorse charities; initiatives; and social programs.. *who* will do that when its abolished? The rich? Celebrities, lol? Not sure why folks like brown, harry, me-gain, et al, are hellbent on screwing the poor. Likely so that people will donate to the poor through these wealthy celebrity foundations, many registered in Delaware where one can have a "non-profit" with no requirement to report financials and may use up to 95% as "administrative fees". Let's face it, among the greatest commodities is the poor.

[@Ionabrodie69]

Utter Rot..

[@LMays-cu2hp]

Thank you for sharing..

[@arnoldsanders6878]

It is so Fed up that all these people can write books about people they don't know and profit of of hate. But, let harry write a ook about his own life AND THE HYPOCRITES LOSE THER CROOKED MINDS !!!!

[@cynthiacopland8634]

Forgiveness, mercy & accommodation for Charles but none for Harry? What a bunch of rot!

[@annebalderston2520]

You forgot Andrew.

[@kelligray1848]

I like Camilla. Charles should have been with her from the start.

[@debradonato408]

Look How Long Queen Elizabeth II Has Been on The THROWN 70 Yrs

[@zeldasmith6154]

Throne.

[@carolwatanabe7576]

The company has enough of its own wealth to pay taxes and finance itself. The money spent by the British taxpayers could have been better spent on improving the lot of the poor. The monarchy might have existed for umpteen generations in England, but not from the same unbroken family line.

[@mrscitrine3592]

60 pennies per person per year is a drop in the bucket tax payers pay

[@Holidaygal]

It would take decades for the government determine what belongs to the BRF and what belongs to the country.

[@andresinsurriaga1082]

That was just what Judas said to Our Lord.

[@madwisdom4929]

@@mrscitrine3592 Their people are starving! The children are cold! 60 pennies per person would save the people.

[@mrscitrine3592]

@@madwisdom4929 you probably look closer. What the monarchy brings in from tourism, the brand, the crown estate which is an independent real estate business that manages properties throughout the United Kingdom from beef farms In the north of Scotland, to the mining in Dorset, the Windsor great park to name a few money from it goes back fo the treasury to benefit the nation’s finances including the need of citizens and tax payers. So to say the 60 pennies per person tax would be the only way to save the people’s needs is wrong.

[@basilmarasco1975]

Since the 9th century, yes. The first king of England was Egbert, who became king of *all* England in 829. Prior to that time, there were seven kingdoms in England, which became competitive and eventually fought each other until the kingdom of Wessex, with Egbert as its king, won out over the others.

[@yvonneplant9434]

Thank you for this history lesson!

[@lesleyowen7654]

And since the norman conquest our kings have been foreigners Their descendants have stolen the land from the English Imposed draconian taxes And enforced the class system

[@basilmarasco1975]

@@lesleyowen7654 But since the time of Henry IV (early 1400s), those kings and queens have been English-speaking, and since the time of George I (early 1700s), the ministers (who were not strictly foreigners) did more of the real work than did the monarch.

[@lesleyowen7654]

@@basilmarasco1975 William of orange was German and spoke no English As are his descendants Our class system supports a load of posh folk and excludes the native brits Including the Windsor’s Philip was Greek

[@basilmarasco1975]

@@lesleyowen7654 Philip was partly Danish, not necessarily Greek. And Queen Elizabeth II is all English and Scottish (which is considered "British") on her mother's side. Of course, she is mostly German on her father's side. The Germans didn't take the British throne; it was given to them by by British Parliament because they were Protestant, as opposed to James II, who was trying to restore Catholicism to Britain.

[@natasharobinson6572]

So Harry was supposed to be a clown for William his whole adult life....good move Harry... William needs to hire someone to clown him

[@TiMalice2009]

Exactly

[@Ionabrodie69]

A clown is a role perfectly suited to Harry.. fake smile painted on but a bitter twisted soul.. He is a nasty piece of work, and we’re WELL RID OF HIM ..🙄🇬🇧

[@saracarson8835]

What a pile of crock

[@johnstarr2326]

Truth😅

[@carolineaxelsson2055]

l must say Harry is the most non- attractive, non-charismatic person l have even seen! A complete turn-off! He can stay in Montecito.

[@zeldasmith6154]

Harry is fun and has a great outlook.

[@pamelameadows9717]

100-percent love Camila as Charles's wife and future Queen. She was actually the perfect wife for him.

[@pamelameadows9717]

@@annesmith6582 that's ridiculous years and years ago. And no I wouldn't have been happy with my husband cheating on me. I don't see the need of punishing somebody and wishing the worst on them for the rest of their life. You need to inform yourself of more of the whole situation and go back years. He wasn't allowed to choose the wife he wanted in the first place. You really do sound ridiculous as far as being traumatized he didn't bring Camilla pride in to take their mother's place anyway. I would hate someone like you to be on my jury

[@pamelameadows9717]

@@annesmith6582 by the way I'm 65 I have four daughters and I have six grandchildren. So you can play pretend with your imaginary children and grandchildren I've actually experience life

[@rosalynfayemartin4027]

Long live the Queen👏👏👏❤️❤️❤️

[@sandyslank1752]

“Allow your enemies their space to hate; They will destroy themselves in the process”. This was disappointing,

[@kimberlyramsey3737]

CBS Sundays should be better than Tina Brown’s pro-monarchy propaganda. Good on Harry for leaving.

[@ninjacat4929]

Thanks for taking the little sh** please keep him we don't like traitors!

[@pam0626]

Charles will be a fantastic King. Cerebral, introspective, a visionary.

[@tinak6484]

Love Charles! And Camilla😊

[@florenceobrien2822]

No way

[@virginiawomack7167]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@lizhorton5333]

I agree, Charles was organic and an environmentalist a long time ago. People used to make fun of him and thought he was nutty for shunning pesticides. He was also into sustainability and impact of man on the climate. He was ahead of his time and glad people are finally appreciating him. Harry should grow up and stop being a spoiled brat with his narc wife,

[@danbev8542]

And an Environmentalist.

[@Skarfp]

The day Camilla becomes Queen will be a sad day indeed.

[@patriciawhitehead4313]

It will be just fine . Camilla is a well educated, well dressed woman who will be a perfect consort to King Charles when the time comes. Poor Diana was nearly brainless and interested almost entirely in fashion and London parties. Charles should never have been forced to marry her by the two meddling grandmothers.

[@salmineo4132]

Avoided Andrew in this interview like the plague .... disappointed

[@salmineo4132]

Why is the public over the monarchy ??? Criminals run free in their midsts

[@cornishpasty4344]

Yep. Let's slag off Harry and Meaghan and ignore the actual criminal.

[@ОльгаВ-п7к]

It's time for the free peoples of Great Britain, Canada and Australia to throw off the yoke of this old dictator and proclaim a real republic!

[@christophersmith3005]

Why only GB, Canada, and Australia? There are 54 nations in the Commonwealth. Don't they all deserve true freedom?

[@catblue2857]

Dictator? You really are ignorant.

[@delorism]

Why doesn't any main stream media report on how bad Harry and Meghan truly are? I understand this is not what this article is about, but I get tired of all the "PUFF Pieces" about those 2! I for one, would love for NBC, ABC, CBS or FOX do something "REAL" about them!

[@layde1]

None so blind. It sickens me how MSM all crawl to these two. They are so undeserving.

[@audreykennedy8891]

The race-card...🙄😏

[@darlene6531]

It is strange. The British papers were very negative about his interview with Hoda, though her colleagues praised her and didn’t ask why she didn’t ask Harry what he meant about his concern that the right people were around the Queen.

[@natasharobinson6572]

The hate is left for you all to do, we don't have a dog in the fight 😛

[@davidj8658]

You really care about this ? Sad.

[@invernessfan3017]

Prince Harry is trying to make a life for himself. He can do that if he wants. I hope Prince Charles and Prince William are good Kings. The British Royal Family have houses in Scotland.

[@ceejayretired]

It's good that Harry is trying to make a new life for himself but it shouldn't be made by slagging off the rest of his family with lies and innuendo. It should be made honesty and with decent work ethics. Lies and deception only breeds contempt.

[@angelatester2471]

I think Mr Trump does as well. - have a place in Scotland.

[@mohomoho1]

I feel for them. NOT!

[@Kexgoija]

Is this the 19th century? Yes.

[@walterricks9965]

What purpose do these people serve?

[@zeldasmith6154]

Delusion. It's a big draw all over the world.

[@jimanderson5883]

Camilla should never be queen.

[@annebalderston2520]

Gigantic hat.

[@claudiajarvis3694]

Why?

[@ms.fabolusmorgan4279]

The world is changing and all this pomp &ceremony made no longer be as important. My opinion🤷

[@salzach353thomas8]

Why doesnt the old lady retire?

[@dantescave1]

Tina is basically a literate, stylish tabloid writer and British as well! As Britain is a one-company town, all wealth and establishment society trickles down from the Royals… she needs to flatter them all in order to keep writing her books on the royals & being invited to the soirées, receptions, weddings, etc …She’s pretty pathetic

[@benjaminpadilla6536]

Totally agree 💯 👍

[@salvyv]

Have you actually read any of Brown’s work? She is frequently very cutting in her depictions of various members of the royal family and the aristocracy. She doesn’t really pull many punches and certainly doesn’t mindlessly flatter anyone. There are plenty of journalists who do, but she is not one. I’m not a super fan of Brown’s or anything, but I think your comment is very misinformed.

[@catblue2857]

Charles is silly to exclude his nieces as working royals. The Queen has 4 children and several cousins to assist her. Charles now only has 2 siblings and one son to assist him since Harry and Andrew are out of the picture. The Royals are in great demand for many ceremonial duties and, the more they are seen, the better. It would be wise to use the York girls and Edward’s children to assist him. However, Charles appears to have never maintained close relationships with his siblings. His position, which was not earned, has led him to believe he is special and better than his siblings. In reality, he is a wimp with low self-esteem who treated his wife abominably by violating his marriage vows and consorting with a mistress. His disgusting publicized phone call is a true picture of a man more common than any commoner in the kingdom. Hope the Queen lives many more years so his reign is as short as possible.

[@vivalasvegas2826]

In this day and age we still have kings and queens... just doesn't seem right

[@Lagerfanny-g7e]

Republics are well over 2000 years old.

[@lizhorton5333]

People have kings and queens because they want them. The Queen and Prince Philip were awesome. Name me someone else who is like that.

[@alexwells9948]

5:21 Home Cooked Meal delivery at Shef Next on Sunday Morning

[@Kexgoija]

McDonald's at Midnight.

[@boomerang8909]

The interviewee had her latest book reviewed in The Washington Post online, but the comment section is mostly pro-Megxit fans who think the author is a royal gossip racist.

[@aliceobrien8390]

To thease people keep negs and hasbeen n America ye can have tham with icing, nobody eals wants the two wingers so good luck to all ye over who think thay ever told a bit of truth from either mouth well that says it all

[@vb1816]

Could be the Sussex squad sugar bot network out in force. Nullifying free speech of anyone who sees through the relentless, race baiting pr narrative. The PR industry really needs to come under the spotlight, as they perpetuate falsehoods behind which high profile people hide. When those falsehoods lead to death threats and calls for the abolition of the monarchy, the industry has clearly over reached. Is there a PR governing body that regulates the bs that is churned out into their affiliated media partners? The world has a right to know what is truth and what is made up narrative.

[@anneallen3566]

I read those yesterday. None of them were Meghan and Harry fanatics. None of them were Tina Brown fanatics. At $35 a book, Brown will be making more money of Harry and Meghan than all the hateful KZbin channels and Piers combined. Browns best work was always gossip. Interesting how she even had crap to say about the Queen, but not one negative word about Camilla.

[@Ionabrodie69]

@@anneallen3566 OOH a sugar ..😂😂🇬🇧

[@natasharobinson6572]

@@darlene6531 if people want to respond they can respond sweetie 🤣...#sugarsnotwithstanding

[@biplobprasad7354]

God Save The Queen I visit Scotland Outlander any time happy 2022*

[@jaycristoval6155]

I don't see any reason to mention Harry at all in this piece..... the title of the video is "the future of the monarchy". Nothing to do with Harry......

[@sjstevens6375]

They said how much they cost the taxpayers but didn’t say how much revenue they generate for England in tourism.

[@mdmiller1112]

This report and Tina Brown is UNTRUTHFUL! 1. Prince Philip, Princess Diana and others refer to the courtiers as The Firm, as apposed to the family! 2. These petty and mean-spirited group keeps the Royal family under control by threatening them with bad press and smear campaign, like the one Tina Brown is writing to support now against Harry and Meghan! 3. Other members of the royal family HAVE worked as *part-time* royals!!*. The firm was especially cruel and harsh to Prince Harry because they feared his global appeal would overshadow the full time royals, especially lazy Kate (deemed so by the Queen) and William who have no genuine purpose of their own that the FIRM hasn’t made up to make them appear to be doing something! TELL THE TRUTH or Get people on here who will!!

[@livelife4222]

😂😂😂

[@tahiti1]

The British monarchy does NOT cost taxpayers $96Mln. They are funded throufh the Crown Estate which is a highly profitable entity, 25% funding the monarchy and remaining 75% TO taxpayes via UK Govnt.

[@sinevins]

Queen Camilla....really?..... what a disgrace. Just ridiculous!

[@gotwalk]

Geez....maybe the queen should collaborate. She had a royal mistep w/ charles & diana's relationship, her gap in addressing Diana's death to the public, andrew's relationship w/ epstein & in the long run, a problematic rift between William & Harry. Time for the queen to reconsider before her time is up.

[@glen7318]

Collaboratte wtih whom? What do you mean by collaborate?

[@sandbridgekid4121]

There's no halfway, unless your Prince Andrew.

[@delorism]

Prince Andrew is not 1/2 in-1/2/out. He does nothing for the FIRM. He did escort his mother to Prince Phillips memorial service. Afterall, that was his father as well as the Queens husband. There have been no charges brought against him. He settled that woman's lawsuit to not distract for the Queen's Jubilee. He didn't make the smartest choices when he was younger, but that young woman was of legal age. She could have left Epstein whenever she chose, but like Prince Harry, was in it for the "money". Now, she is a millionaire!

[@Kexgoija]

Andy takes after Roaming Daddy.

[@starleehays9975]

Definitely on their way out. Charles’ reign will be sad. Prince Phillip wasn’t allowed to have title of King so the Camilla should not have a queen title after all that she and Charles have done without consequence. Ugh!

[@glen7318]

nonsese. the husband of a queen is not ever King..

[@starleehays9975]

@@glen7318 So should it not be the same for the wife of a king?

[@glen7318]

@@starleehays9975 well it hasn't been for centuries. THe wife of the King is queen. If that changes then Kate will only be Princess Consort when WIliam is king

[@lesleymcshanemitchell9651]

The Queen Strong Faithfull and Loyal to her calling. however hard it became. The Family have takjen there duties Except One who shall be nameless but lives in the USA> He could do to take a leaf out of her Book. Never complain never explain.

[@LG-dj9qr]

BS.

[@lindagilstrap5293]

Tina can take up for Camilla but not Harry.