Tips for Best Riflescope Buy

Subscribe to my channel: bit.ly/RonSpomerOutdoorsSubscribe
Links:
Website: ronspomeroutdoors.com/
Facebook: / ronspomeroutdoors
Instagram: / ronspomer
Who is Ron Spomer
For 44 years I’ve had the good fortune to photograph and write about my passion - the outdoor life. Wild creatures and wild places have always stirred me - from the first flushing pheasant that frightened me out of my socks in grandpa’s cornfield to the last whitetail that dismissed me with a wag of its tail. In my attempts to connect with this natural wonder, to become an integral part of our ecosystem and capture a bit of its mystery, I’ve photographed, hiked, hunted, birded, and fished across much of this planet. I've seen the beauty that everyone should see, survived adventures that everyone should experience. I may not have climbed the highest mountains, canoed the wildest rivers, caught the largest fish or shot the biggest bucks, but I’ve tried. Perhaps you have, too. And that’s the essential thing. Being out there, an active participant in our outdoor world.
All loading, handloading, gunsmithing, shooting and associated activities and demonstrations depicted in our videos are conducted by trained, certified, professional gun handlers, instructors, and shooters for instructional and entertainment purposes only with emphasis on safety and responsible gun handling. Always check at least 3 industry handloading manuals for handloading data, 2 or 3 online ballistic calculators for ballistic data. Do not attempt to duplicate, mimic, or replicate anything you see in our videos. Firearms, ammunition, and constituent parts can be extremely dangerous if not used safely.
Produced by: @red11media
Disclaimer
All loading, handloading, gunsmithing, shooting and associated activities and demonstrations depicted in our videos are conducted by trained, certified, professional gun handlers, instructors, and shooters for instructional and entertainment purposes only with emphasis on safety and responsible gun handling. Always check at least 3 industry handloading manuals for handloading data, 2 or 3 online ballistic calculators for ballistic data. Do not modify any cartridge or firearm beyond what the manufacturer recommends. Do not attempt to duplicate, mimic, or replicate anything you see in our videos. Firearms, ammunition, and constituent parts can be extremely dangerous if not used safely.

[@300_WM]

One trick I use when I’m shopping for scopes is to send my wife off somewhere in the store and then make sure she notices me checking her out through the scope. She’ll feel special enough for a bit and will ignore that I went $500 over budget.

[@slick-px4pq]

I tried that one time but all I could see was a goldfish

[@phild9813]

Huh. Funny. All I saw was the middle finger.

[@rahulbannerjee4845]

Excellent i would apply too

[@randallrobinson3448]

I can't send mine off she wants one too

[@1joshjosh1]

👍👍👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣

[@teddahrable]

I've had a Bushnell Banner on a .30-06 since 1998. I shoot, at least, 3 animals a year and sometimes as many as 6 and I shoot about 100 rounds a year through that rifle to get ready for hunting season. I have had zero issues with that scope moving around. A long time ago (1981), I went to school for TV, Stereo, and VCR repair and I was told by my instructor that when it came to quality of equipment, price didn't matter, "you didn't have to buy the most expensive Hi-Fi if your ear couldn't tell the difference between that and a JVC Hi-Fi set unless you just want to show off". Same with TVs today. If you can't see the difference between HD and 4K, why spend the extra money? Same with firearms and scopes IMHO. If I can shoot sub-MOA with a Mossberg 100ATR and a Bushnell "Dawn to Dusk" scope, what is a $6,000.00 rifle and a $4,000.00 scope gonna do better? Will it drag the animal out of the woods and load the it on the truck? Because that's what it'd have to do for me to spend that much on it.

[@Lateralus1007]

Some Ppl make $10,000 in a week Some in a month Guess it depends what your budget is

[@user-zx5yd4cf3y]

Its not only about budget. What i noticed here in hunting over Europe is that old money guys tends to act very practical and dont care about most expensive and most modern. I cant speak about NA but in Europe, ppl act the less money they have they spend on expensive equipment that does not make any difference.

[@charlessexton1719]

I agree

[@bisleyblackhawk1288]

@@charlessexton1719the Leupold Freedom series are way past their price point plus their lifetime warranty and customer service (I’ve never had to use it😊) is said to be fantastic…Vortex warranty and customer service is also great (I’ve had to use it over the years…but they totally and quickly took care of my issues)…I recommend both 👍👍👍

[@reedehinger2636]

This dude gives me 1880's circus salesman vibes with the flat brimmed straw hats and red/white pinstripe shirts and suspenders.

[@39MercFlathead]

In 1967 I bought my first big game rifle for my 21st birthday from Clark Brothers in Warrenton, Virginia. I was going to graduate from the University of Virginia and the world was my oyster, so I wanted a rifle to hunt everything and everywhere. They sold me a Remington 700 BDL in .30-06 with a 2x-7x Leupold Vari-X II using a Redfield Jr. mount. What fantastic advice for a novice big game hunter with only years of Jack O'Connor articles for experience. I still have that scope today on a 1978 Ruger in .30-06 and I have taken 30 elk and I don't recall how many deer with it. I thought I wanted a Redfield scope at the time, but they convinced that that Leupold was as good and cost $5 less, which was actually serious cash for a college student in those days. There are lots of good scopes out today, but I have stayed with Leupold for the past 54 years on my big game rifles and have never been sorry.

[@tosainu1]

Clark Brothers is still in business, great gunstore

[@edwardabrams4972]

60 years o some of my guns and still going strong! Only name in scopes I use on hundreds of rifles I have owned through collecting and hunting

[@noahhorinek]

Jokes on you, Ron. I always wanted a goldfish

[@ethimself5064]

🤣🤣

[@erikbogerman2048]

I think a goldfish/optics device combo would sell like gang busters to be honest.

[@ethimself5064]

@@erikbogerman2048 🤣🤣👍

[@jeanmorin3247]

I would not mind if it was solid gold, especially if it's heavier than two ounces...

[@GARDENER42]

I have several Leupold VX-III scopes, a VX2 rimfire, an FXII, a couple of Zeiss & a Schmidt & Bender PMII. All have been 100% reliable, capable of "shooting the box" & have good to superb optical properties. I'd far rather "buy once, cry once" than maybe save a few hundred £ & have a scope let me down at a critical moment.

[@darionvacher9841]

I just bought a Steiner m7xi, it's not quite a Schmift and Bender PMll but I will say the tracking is superb and the optical quality is fantastic. That said I agree with the buy once cry once way of thinking

[@chrisdaniel1339]

I have owned a couple of Leupold VX-III and they are very nice, no issues whatsoever.

[@johncox2865]

Wow! I’ve never heard half that much about scopes! Thanks Ron!

[@brianquigley7336]

Like your vids Ron. You get straight to the point, no time wasted. Lots of info.

[@imwatchingyounow2]

So much information, thank you. Much love.

[@johnkaraphillis754]

Thanks for important tips and information regarding optics. Just as shooters/hunters are loyal to a particular cartridge and rifle, optics are also included. I know it’s true for myself. It’s great there are a wide range of quality optics available as price comes into play for most. Continue to eagerly await your videos. Thanks again!

[@rahulbannerjee4845]

Very useful advice THANK YOU RON

[@richardlucas2155]

Ron thanks for the great information on scopes I,learned my lesson years ago when I missed a deer with the cheap scope I had on it also think of the money you save on ammo because it won’t get off track as often once you set it in

[@blackpowder4016]

I've been using a Redfield 2x7x32 scope on my 30-06 for 50 years. It's never failed me. It was top of the line in its day. Now I see scopes selling for more than the rifles they're mounted on.

[@tomcurran8470]

Old USA made Weavers are still good and you can find them on eBay.

[@russellking9762]

i can vouch for that...i've had a Redfield Wideview Accutrac 3x9 on my Weatherby Mark v 7mm both built in 1971...never wandered off zero ever

[@kurtreinhardt6789]

Thanks for the info on scopes- didn't really know what to look for before watching your video

[@retirednavy8720]

Hard to go wrong with a Leupold. In more than 40 years of shooting and hunting I have never seen one fail and they have done everything I have asked them to. Nikon was also good but they no longer make scopes. I keep a Nikon 4x on hand to test rifles and loads. Unless you get over 200 yards 4x is all you need for hunting. Even on my variables I rarely take them off 4x. Optics like scopes are things many make more difficult than they need to be.

[@TurboJakebrakeKingpin169]

Nikon is vortex now so not all is lost.

[@ATFisGay]

I've seen top of the line leupolds fail

[@natewilson2848]

Another excellent made video Mr. Ron with great insight and educational.

[@DeerHunter308]

When I looked at the time you had, I was amazed that you packe all this information into it. Great Job.

[@wstepnout7215]

Great information. Last week we were sighting in 3 scoped rifles I have 2 brands of scopes. I agree with your comments on scope adjustments. I have a great scope from 30 years ago that moves EXACTLY 1/4 INCH per click @ 100 yards. I have another brand that clams to move 1/4"/100 but it has never been able to accomplished that. It's nice, it's accurate but not a target scope. Another great video, glad I found the channel.

[@eskimo1000]

I have a leupold, vortex, and nikon. Never had any problems with them 👍

[@johnnash5118]

You should’ve used “thingies” and “doohickies.” I love you man.😄 A couple years ago my local Sportsman’s was selling the discontinued Leupold 2-10x42mm Long Range with HD lenses for $399 regularly $799. These thingies were small, light and exceptionally clear, so I picked up 2 and I’m still happy for my fortune.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

I'll try to remember technical terms like thingamajigees next time!

[@devinb3397]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors Ron, which would you choose between Z5 and VX5HD . Based on optical quality alone? I’ve got a Z5 and looked through a buddies VX5 and I swear the Z5 is leaps and bounds ahead

[@andypanda4927]

Saw a Leupold 3X9 50mm (think it was 50mm, anyway) for $320. Beautiful clarity and wanted to grab, but . . . Leupold still have a good rep?

[@devinb3397]

@@andypanda4927 I have a VX3i 4.5-14 and I’m selling it, doesn’t come close to Swarovski quality. Can’t speak on the older models but apparently they were way better

[@johnshields9110]

@@devinb3397 The older Leupold's were very clear. I bought a 12X 42 with an adjustable AO in 1976 and put it on my 22 250. It's still very clear all the ways to the edges.

[@chrismorris308]

Great info & topic Ron...Thanks I learned alot!

[@scrider5493]

Essential info, thanks.

[@jimnaz5267]

as always informative, fair, and fun to watch

[@dannytravis7118]

Thank you for the video and explaining about what to look for. I don't know much about scopes and I just learned a lot

[@64samsky]

Very good video Ron, thank you!

[@rhubarbpie2027]

Great info as always, your videos are an "acid test" on checking my knowledge! I can't say I know something without the abililty to teach it with confidence, and you remind me that there is always more to learn and know.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

I discover new things each time I post a video and read these comments. We're all in this together and can/should learn from one another. I'm always thankful to viewers who provide more info or correct any of my mistakes.

[@stringbender7190]

This is a little older, but I just found it. I buy Vortex Scopes...nothing more, nothing less. They have never failed me. My brother did have one fail, he had it back from warranty in less than 2 weeks.

[@jerryjohnsonii4181]

I absolutely love all of my Vortex scopes !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Also my Bushnell scopes too.

[@unclefreedom213]

Got in my copy of P.O. Ackley's book Handbook for Shooters and Reloaders after you mentioned it in one of your last videos. I'm excited to start on it. I spent an hour last night looking through his load data in the back

[@mitchmitchell6873]

Thanks Ron for this very very good review on scope characteristics....I like watching all your videos and hearing your exhaustive comments. One thing to add to this, is probably the rubber seals and gas filling inside of scopes in order not to get foggy inside thus preventing blur vision. I am sure you would speak about it....- Michel from Canada

[@TTR210]

thats insanely informative, Ron! thanks a bunch!

[@davidedwards8940]

Love my Tract, Nightforce, Bushnell Elite Tactical

[@hujohnny7785]

Great product, easy to clean -worked out great !

[@CCW1911]

Very informative, I think many people buy more magnification than they need giving up quality in the bargain for the same price.

[@garrettforchrist2700]

Excellent advice about scopes, thank you Ron!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

My pleasure Garrett.

[@barbarariener6360]

Mounted a fourteen dollar Bushnell scope on my Remington 700 in 222 cal. back in early 1980s.That scope is still on that rifle today and never has been touch. Always been careful and respectfully especially with my firearms. H.Riener

[@feetoorourke7152]

My brother has a $2000 nightforce and I have a $4000 zero comp. The nightforce is amazing in every way, but the crazy amount of detail you can resolve with super premium glass is outstanding.

[@mysweetshadow747]

The Bushnell Banner that came with my .22-250 is clear and really great for is price tag honestly. I get 1/2" groups @100 yds out of that rifle with one of the cheapest optics, nothing wrong with that!

[@tomassoyweyvon4902]

Ron, love your channel, awesome job on erasing the cobwebs associated with scope purchase, thanks so much

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

You are most welcomed, Tomas

[@arborist460]

I needed this info ron…I was and still am researching all the best scopes for my ddm5v3 ar-10..I slapped a 3x15 vortex pst on er for now…had the nightforce 2.5x20 but forgot to up my card limit and had to step down a few notches lol…the difference from a $800 scope to a $2000 one seemed pretty substantial especially clarity…and havin that much range.2.5x20 is perfect for me…thanks again I love your channel…matt in ky

[@timeverett7828]

Have bushell 6500 elite 2.5x16x50 scope... a little bit heavy but tough to beat all around. Covers almost every situation one could imagine.

[@robertmattern2078]

Swarovski and Zeiss are the class of the field. If not then go with Leupold.

[@thompsonjerry3412]

Eye box is quite different between scopes and is important for quick shots.

[@billygoat1708]

A few years ago I went to trade a rifle to a dealer at a gun show. It had a Bushnell scope. He wouldn't consider giving me anything extra for it. He told me that the only scopes that he pays extra for on trade are Nikon and Leupold. Since then they have been the only scopes I have purchased.

[@lancesundquist6359]

This is a great lesson for all folks owning scopes or just ready to by one. Mounting the scope is highly important, too. Rings and torque on the screws. Great video!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Lance.

[@curtisgore1611]

Very good on explaining everything!

[@alanmcmichael6714]

Well, I just learned more about optics than I have learned in the past 50 years. Thank you.

[@williamgaines9784]

One thing in your 'check the movement without shooting' segment: remember that if the right arrow is for point of aim, then the reticle may be moving the opposite direction when you dial right. That is why on "one shot zero" you move the reticle to the bullet hole, or center of a group, you've shot while keeping the gun still at original point of aim. If you use the "click" method, you would dial the scope the number clicks up/down and right/left from the hole to aiming point. I generally use the click method because I shoot off a single point rest and the gun is hand held otherwise. So if bullets are hitting 2 inches left and 3 inches low, I would dial the number of clicks up and right to bring the bullet path and sight picture together. All of your points are excellent as usual.

[@stephaniethomasson8812]

I have a Leupold VX-freedom 3-9x40 on a 6.5 creedmoor, that the turret springs were bad from the get-go…. But I didn’t know it, because I didn’t know you could do tests like the one Ron had mentioned. I’d put about 200 rounds through the rifle and groups were a mess. Sent it back to Leupold for $12 insured by USPS via their instruction. Said if they couldn’t fix it or I wasn’t happy they’d send a brand new one of equal value. They rebuilt the whole inside, and the thing works like a champ. Customer service was great. Bought a Leupold 4-14x44 with CDS this year for a 30-06 and have had no problems.

[@edwardabrams4972]

Hunting and collecting guns for about 60 years now and the only name on my guns is Leupold! When I buy a used gun with a scope on it I donate to someone who wants a free scope because I have missed some of the biggest game in my life by not having a Leupold scope on my gun!

[@markhansen8078]

My scope preferences are Leupold, Redfield (gone), Nikon, Bushnell... in that order. I am liking the 2-7 power scopes more lately, even 1-4 is ok too for some applications. Several of my scopes are 3-9x40mm. I rarely use 9X. My shooting distances are almost all 75 yards or less. Once in a while I will possibly have a shot 100-200 yards.

[@gumecindogarcia1070]

Great information. I have my Pop's old KMart Marlin glenfield, along with the original scope, it was probably a blue light special buy. The best thin crosshair i know of, dead accurate

[@davidtennyson4908]

Great comparisons. Without trashing any brands or manufacturing locations, you've given us more info than all the manufacturers ads on the web. Thanks!

[@wymple09]

My backyard is a cornfield. Every day a few minutes before sunset when the light starts to go, deer will cross the field for about a 10 minute slow crossing, usually 7-10 of them. The best look I've ever gotten at them was thru a Leupold.

[@Sabre22]

I inherited my late fathers Remington Model 721 (30/06) made in 1949 with a swift scope (4x32) he had on in 1979-80. I cdecided to use it for an elk hunt in an arera he always wanted to go elk hunting in. I had never fired the rifle I worked up a load for a 180 grain Nosler Partition that shot a .509 group off the bench at 100 yds and a group of less than 2 inches (if I remember correctly) at 300 yards. I did not get an elk But it was a great trip anyway.

[@garyr.4626]

What are you doing with it, and where are you doing it also matters. Weight is a big factor for me. Durability, weight, clarity, mechanics in that order. I hunt where 300 yards is on the top end of distances and a rare shot. Mostly though, shots are under 75 yards. Leupold VX3HD 1.5 x 5 Is what I settled on for my last purchase. Great picture, lightweight, great FOV, and generous eye box. Love it

[@mentorofarisia371]

love your wooden box idea.

[@laughingsaladfarm]

Thank you sir. Great help!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

You're welcome!

[@paparich19X]

Another piece of glass that is over looked is a good set of binoculars. For years I have used modest priced binos and thought that there wasn’t any reason to spend the extra money. As I’ve aged and my eyes have gotten worse I finally invested in a better set of glass. Just got a Leica Ultravid HD and could not be happier. My eyes don’t get as tired,everything is much clearer at distance and first light.

[@repetemyname842]

Scopes are one of those tools that once you find your flavor, its hard to change. Been using Burris for over 30 years now and couldnt be happier.

[@lawrencegeisewite6444]

I'm the same way with vortex

[@George_K1]

Excellent Video... very insightful and sensible

[@ironDsteele]

Great video Ron. I will say with the advancements in telescopic sights and manufacturing breakthroughs there's no excuse for a scope worth a couple hundred bucks to not dial accurately and consistently especially inside of 500 yards. If it doesn't I'd send it back and look at something else.

[@knobjob2839]

Good, comprehensive information. Nice video 👍

[@joemarchinski7798]

Redfield revolution 3x9x50 accu-range retical $220..on my 1992 Ruger m77rs 270 winchester...they are made in USA by Leupold on the same one as the mark 4..with Leupold glass... excellent scope...super clarity..contrast.. brightness and positive turret clicks...never lost zero

[@grizzley8888]

Thank you sir for sharing your knowledge

[@imkindofabigdeal4308]

Nice to see a TRACT scope in there. I really like mine - great glass, great mechanicals and the owners do a nice job supporting the product.

[@dirksteffens2390]

agreed, the only scopes I buy now.

[@tylarhaugan7908]

I have 2 favorites right now for my 300 winmag i use 10x swfa ss. And for my 18 inch 7mm08 I use 1 to 4 Leopold

[@mic982]

Ron is always entertaining to watch and I always learn something from him. He's a KZbin gem fora lot of us.

[@TerryLee04950]

I have a Marlin bolt action 243 win with a Sight mark 1-4x24 AR -223. It is not the most expensive set up but it has served me well for deer hunting and coyotes out to 250 yards.

[@glennanderson2790]

Good video Ron, one of the best points you made was to evaluate the scope in low light conditions, this is where a good quality scope shines !!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Absolutely

[@carlmontgomery1971]

love your work, its great bringing you down to earth sense of humour to the show. please keep it up and love the topics and content

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Much appreciated! Thanks.

[@rayzar6720]

Hi from Australia Ron. I subscribed to your channel 4 months ago. Sir you give such practical no nonsense information without all the BS, ie straight to the point. Thanks for speaking my language and a credit to you for sharing your wealth of information.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Many thanks, Rayzar!

[@DoubleSpurRanch]

Great video with useful info. Thanks for sharing! Your authenticity is my favorite part of the presentation. You actually seem to care, and your passion for sharing shows.

[@HikeHuntHaul]

After spending a good amount of 💰 on scopes; as well as trading back and forth. “Eye Relief” is a big feature many scopes don’t offer; unless you pay for it. Consumers get caught up on glass quality; when the feature that comes with already great glass quality is the need for “long eye relief”. I have to say I bought a Leupold last year over a similar Vortex model (since I already had a similar vortex model to the leupold model) for another 300 win mag rifle. The “eye relief” was HUGE. I found out what I was paying for in the Leupold. I’m sold on Leupold; a life long purchase and actual featured qualities. (Plus it’s much lighter that my Vortex brands). Great video! Keep em coming!

[@JS-uy8wc]

I too am looking for a scope for a 300 WBM. Do you mind sharing which specific model you selected?

[@HikeHuntHaul]

@@JS-uy8wc absolutely, for the money. I bought a Leupold VX-5. Expensive yes. But the eye relief on my weatherby mountain light rifle kicking 180 grain bullets makes it so I didn’t have to crowd the scope. Scope bite was a problem for my vortex. Plus the glass is excellent, adjustments superb, and Leupold backs it 100% for life. I’m actually budgeting to put one on my other 300 win mag Winchester model 70 because I liked it so much. I highly recommend that scope and brand. Plus, the scope I much lighter than other brands with the similar features. Eye relief was noticeable immediately.

[@JS-uy8wc]

@@HikeHuntHaul Thank you for sharing.

[@HikeHuntHaul]

@@JS-uy8wc Glad I could help. 😃👍🏻 Be safe and enjoy.

[@edwardabrams4972]

Leupold for the win! If you buy Vortex you will be using that lifetime warranty a lot and also at the expense of that once in a lifetime animal you missed out on!

[@AussieInCA11]

One point left out, make sure reticle and dials are the same measure, ie both MOA or both Mil. Many come with a few reticle choices so look into the purpose of each one and choose one that suits you best. As a general rule I'd recommend moa/mil over BDC style reticles. If you can, buy on sale, you can get some great deals. I had my scope 6 months before I found the rifle for it. Don't break the bank but get the best quality you can afford 👌. Ps. If it's a short range/woods gun go for a lower magnification, lighter scope. No need to be able to see the moon of you're shooting 100 yards.

[@ErikT3]

Good information. Maybe consider doing as video on scope choices for rimfire rifles

[@KretinD]

I've been a big fan of the primary arms glx. Especially the 4-16x50. The features, tracking and optical quality are unmatched at it's price point.

[@jtlanden9771]

I have a Primary Arms that has really impressed me as well.

[@damondiehl5637]

I second that. I have a Predator on my AR. Super simple reticle with the ACSS horse shoe, chevron and a simple post with marks for holdover out to 600 yards. A couple circles for range finding. I really don't need the traditional reticle lines, especially the vertical one. My dad's BAR has a Weaver scope that only has three posts, two horizontal and one vertical. They don't quite meet in the center. So, it is not precise enough for target shooting, but it is awesome for big game. Points very naturally. Between the two of us, we have killed dozens of deer with it.

[@daveknowles3055]

the last scope I purchased was for my CZ 457 22lr. They had 2 that fit my requirements at the shop and I spent quite a bit of time looking through them. I ended up with a 3-9 x40 as the clarity was a marked improvement over the 4-12X40. Two different brands but the lower magnification scope had superior optics as least in my opinion

[@jimmydelozier6177]

Man I love my 457! Wonder gun

[@chrisjones469]

This was awesome information! Thanks for making this.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

You're welcome, Chris.

[@1joshjosh1]

Ron Spomer kicks ass!!!!

[@armeddiver]

Thank y9u for this video. I learned a lot from it and you confirmed something that several others have said which is, you can get a really good reliable scope without giving up a house payment to do it. Of all the scopes I currently own I have only had one scope fail me and it failed twice and it was a $1,400.00 scope. So far my $250.00 to $700.00 scopes have all worked great with no failures.

[@thylacine1962]

excellent advice Ron. After very careful consideration, I too think the goldfish is an unnecessary extra.

[@danielcurtis1434]

Are you serious!!! I totally disagree!!! I would love to have a pet with my guns. I think he would be a nice addition (when he isn’t blocking my view). Honestly I think a family of guppies would be absolutely perfect!!! Now who makes a water tight scope???

[@thylacine1962]

@@danielcurtis1434 priceless bloody priceless. Just my luck i will buy a scope with a gold fish as advertised and discover i purchased a tiger shark instead.

[@nobodyhome8637]

Yeah but if you train the goldfish properly he can sight in ur elevation and windage for you

[@lcdurr9695]

Cost Extra?

[@TruthAboutHeaven]

Great video. Thanks!

[@40beretta1]

Thank you Ron. Very concise. I liked that you gave information; Not brand oriented

[@11ccom1]

Thanks Ron.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

You are very welcome

[@j.dalemorgan2975]

Great job Ron. Learned a lot.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@xli2117]

Wow! Very thorough Ron! Thank you😮

[@garyhammond.greatinfo.9225]

Like the flashlight trick, thanks for the tip.

[@masondick4851]

I’ve had great luck with my Bushnell elites. I now have some Nikon’s and a vortex and they’re all nice and work well too.

[@talisikid1618]

Nikon is gone.

[@Jakabre]

This is absolutely the most informative and engaging video I've seen on this subject. Thank you, sir!

[@guardianminifarm8005]

Who doesn't have a high regard and great appreciation for honest, common sense person with a pleasant approach? Yet is as hardy and tough as they come. Add years of hands on working experience and you have Ron Spomer. Got to love this guy. We need more like him.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks for those kind words of support, Minifarm.

[@ewetho]

I have 2 of the Meopta 2.5-15x44 in links and 5hey are fantastic

[@ericb.4358]

My (now discontinued) Bushnell Elite LRTS 4.5 - 18 x 44 has an illuminated G3 small "Xmas tree" reticle and thus I don't need to dial except to sight it in. The quality is Very high for the under $1,000. price I paid. But also look a SIG Sierra 6 scopes. WOW, the tech! This scope sits on my 6.5 PRC Browning X-Bolt Pro in Talley rings for longer range hunting here in Nevada.

[@raywhitehead730]

I follow what the experts use. There is a guy who reports on what competitors use in competition shooting. In recent years, Vortex and Night Force are heavily favored. I have both. I also did a lot of research independently.

[@sundowngates2087]

A few yrs ago I bought a Nikon for the "No Fault" warranty. It turned out to be a great scope. So i bought 3 more for different rifles. There still great scopes, but i don't any warranties anymore.

[@raymondlowry8564]

Outstanding presentation! I have spent most of my adult like (I’ll be 70 next year) working either in gun stores or in the sales field for many of the companies in the hunting/firearms business. Among the optics companies were Burris (when Don was still alive), Redfield, Weaver, Steiner, and Zeiss. Your information should be viewed by everyone BEFORE purchasing any scope. You have covered much more than the basics, you have provided supremely valuable information (including looking through the scope as it is getting dark, not at high noon)! In any case, my sincere compliments on a job well done. I have also subscribed to your channel.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Raymond. And happy birthday.

[@davejensen8882]

I really like this channel. A lot of good info on it.

[@brianjaynes1030]

Vortex - the best customer service and warranty that you WILL need!

[@SuperMatt1235]

Direct to consumer scope companies are really good products and the price is awesome for excellent quality.

[@noep99]

Thank you sir

[@normansouthtx152]

A one piece tub and etched radical are high on my list. I tend to use lower powered scopes 2 x 7 as I like a wide field of view for shooting a moving target. My rule on price is to be willing to spend as much as the price of the rifle if necessary to cover all requirements possible. I also re-use scopes that are keepers before shopping for a new one when possible...

[@bobgyetvai9444]

Im sick of useless high power scopes !!! No FOV , too much magnification , poor low light preformance , WEAK INTERNALS , etc .

[@robertezell1916]

It is a lot of good glass now for what you pay for it. A butt load of good scopes and binoculars and spotting scopes as well. Thanks for another good video!