TITANIC Sinking Theories I Danijel My personal theory

[@Kodisstuff]

Wow. Science just said: "ye I'm out"

[@lorielical8071]

I like how you used your imagination

[@ss-united-states-my-beloved]

what did I just watch

[@ss-united-states-my-beloved]

physics are gone

[@PurpleStarLines2]

There weren't explosions!!!!!!!!!!!😂😂😂😅😅😅

[@ss-united-states-my-beloved]

not to be rude but this is the worst theory I have ever seen aside from the v-break

[@AceofAces777]

I assume the explosions are meant to replicate the sparks that Jack Thayer said came from the second funnel when it fell over as well as sparks during the breakup. The theory seems alright to me

[@PurpleStarLines2]

@@AceofAces777 it's a reasonable theory, but there is just one issue, the ship had an even keel just after the starboard wing began to flood.

[@ShellytheShell0]

Innacuracies: 1. Titanic's 2nd funnel couldnt catch on fire and collapse instantly. 2. It's the wrong angle, titanic hit the iceberg on the starboard (right) side. 3. the stern couldnt automatically turn and sink like that, science just went out the window. Total Inaccuracies: 3 or more. Vee: SHELLY WHAT-

[@randombelugaman]

Survives said she did list to port!

[@Kasubaz]

Sinking doesn’t need science it’s physics and it listed to port and the 2nd funnel did catch on fire

[@ShellytheShell0]

@@Kasubaz I think your talking about the titanic 2, and Titanic's 2nd funnel never caught on fire..

[@Kasubaz]

@@ShellytheShell0titanic 2?? 💀

[@InhertiaPink-t7n]

@@ShellytheShell0The Second Funnel did catch alight…