Softube Console 1 Channel Mk III 🫶🏽 Top 10 Features

[@ToddUrban]

Even more info on the new release: Softube Console 1 Mixing System Mk III 🎧 Channel and Fader Workflow Tips kzbin.info/www/bejne/i6i4q5mln52DpMU

[@DoitYHWH]

Thank you for making this overview of the Core Mixing Suite, there is very little demonstration of this Console 1 plug-in on the inter-webs.

[@ToddUrban]

Glad it helped! 😃

[@mixedbymatty]

Great Video Todd! Love that there is a working plugin now when you don't have Console 1 with you. Also the way track selectors work now is huge!

[@ToddUrban]

Thanks for watching Matty! 🙏🏻 Yeah, the track selector colors are super premium looking. It’s a small thing but makes the entire workflow feel so much faster!

[@spookyomansions1]

Absolutely superb video, much more in depth than the normal influencer type vidoes on KZbin. Thank you so much.

[@ToddUrban]

I appreciate your kind words and for watching! 📺 😃

[@spookyomansions1]

@ToddUrban So informative, seriously! I've just ordered one.

[@reiamusicgroup]

Great video thanks! I’m still using Console 1 & Fader. Love the recent upgrade.

[@ToddUrban]

Great to hear! The new Mk III has a new feel and some obvious new features. But the original units are still great and still getting updated! 😃

[@DanielFowlerSr]

This is a Very Nice Presentation of the Console One. I am a very New User to the unit. I love all that you are instructing me in this Video, and I will reference it often. I have 2 units on different systems, you make me feel great about this purchase. Thank you, good friend.

[@ToddUrban]

Glad to hear this was helpful. Also make sure to check out the Softube walkthrough, which takes a slightly different angle. I appreciate you watching and supporting the channel.

[@DanielFowlerSr]

@@ToddUrban I Definitely will! I have this video on a loop all morning. Love it and what you are saying. Having Compress 1 and 2 allows for both to have a single signal, wow, this is very Impressive. Thank you so much, Todd.

[@RolfSchild]

Thank you so much for this presentation. Well done. Most likely I will buy that thing.

[@ToddUrban]

It’s a massive time saver and just feels great compared to plugins and a mouse

[@DomSigalas]

Nice one Todd! Looks awesome!

[@ToddUrban]

Thanks for watching Dom! 🙏🏻

[@nextofsearch]

Excellent video. You are a so talented video creator, who explains complicated topics in a very concise and easy way. Thank you!

[@ToddUrban]

Thank you for the kind words. 😀

[@orphic-trench]

I have the mkii and this looks like a truly amazing upgrade.

[@ToddUrban]

I’m a big fan of the feel and the improved workflow. Everything just feels faster for me based on the way I work.

[@michaelbrodie931]

You have just cost me nearly £900, and I love it.

[@ToddUrban]

It is great! Just the feel of the new potentiometers alone makes it worth it.

[@peterpeper4837]

That's all very nice but i can not stop staring at the Neve 5060 Centerpiece

[@ToddUrban]

Ha. Yeah, I love that one too. I have a separate video on it. That is a never sell item for me!

[@reiamusicgroup]

😂

[@jk-xe5em]

@@ToddUrbannot even gonna ask how much it cost lol

[@thePunkRockMix]

Nice Idea with the panner and also the simulation of summing ITB. Over all C1 III rocks!

[@ToddUrban]

Yeah, whether in the box or working hybrid, it speeds up my workflow! 😃

[@favourhenshaw197]

Brilliant video Todd! You’re the best! Looking forward to getting my unit on launch day 🥳🥳

[@ToddUrban]

Thank you! Once you get it, leave a comment as to what you think. There are so many new features, but only so many that can be put into a 10-15 minute video at once!

[@aceedmond8053]

Love my MKII but I just might have to upgrade... I think I'll wait until the fall when ST releases the new Fader unit to go with it.

[@ToddUrban]

Yeah, you can wait if you want them both to match. But the good news is you can mix and match generations, so you don’t need to wait if you want to use the older Fader unit with the new Channel! 😃

[@aceedmond8053]

Thanks Todd, answered my question. Amazing product. @@ToddUrban

[@ToddUrban]

@@aceedmond8053 and to answer your other questions, yes you can start a mix on one unit and go to the other generation and back since the settings are stored in the plug-in and not the hardware.

[@aceedmond8053]

Excellent !!! @@ToddUrban

[@MONTIQUEWILLIS]

Great video! Can’t wait to get one in my space 🎉 day 1 fan

[@ToddUrban]

Yes sir! Can’t wait to see your setup with it! 📸

[@thecoastCoverband]

I love the mkIII is there any news of the mkIII Fader?

[@ToddUrban]

The only word as of right now is that Softube worked to get Channel out first, but properly developed. We know Fader is coming, but there isn't an announce timeline just yet. But the developers are making sure the product is fully functioning and badass from day 1, rather than releasing it early with updates needed.

[@thecoastCoverband]

Thank you Todd good answer and I hope there will be a transport function on it thank you for the videos Gr.Ness@@ToddUrban

[@ZozillaThaGreat]

Exellent Video Todd !! Thks !!

[@ToddUrban]

Thanks for taking the time to watch! 📺

[@uplift321]

great video. thanks! I've used the mk ii for years so looking forward to getting stuck in with the mk iii. I do wish it could use the UADx plugins as well as the DSP versions.

[@ToddUrban]

Well, a recent instagram teaser already showed it’s coming! 🎉

[@uplift321]

@@ToddUrban oh that is amazing news! thanks

[@ToddUrban]

@@uplift321 it even looks like maybe they leaked a sneak peak of Fabfilter working too. 👀

[@uplift321]

holy shiza@@ToddUrban

[@danielkisel5661]

Nice video Todd! Can you tell me if there is any option to increase or decrease knob LEDs and display brightness? I like the look of it but I'm afraid I don't want bright white light during the evening mixing sessions. How do you find the new White color do you like it more than MKII and is it brighter? Thanks!

[@ToddUrban]

Actually, super interesting point! Yes, you can adjust the brightness, and I love that! I have some 500 series dbx comps that are so bright, I needed to cover them since they were blinding my clients. So it’s great that you can adjust these on Channel. As for the white, I’m a fan. I find them much easier to see than the previous generation, even when at the low light setting.

[@danielkisel5661]

@ToddUrban Nice, thanks! I'm glad to hear that! Looks like MKIII is an upgrade in every way over MKII.

[@ToddUrban]

@@danielkisel5661 absolutely. Familiar form factor, but a completely new build for every component.

[@akagerhard]

All of this sounds great. The one thing I don't like is that I don't have a knob for each send and each channel. But I do understand that this is something that would best be implemented in the Console 1 Fader. So if Softube creates a new Console 1 Fader for the Console 1 Channel MK III, I hope that they put 3 knobs on top of each Fader, enabling me to quickly test, tweak and automate sends for multiple channels at the same time. If three knobs (per fader) is too much to ask for, make it at least 2 (and add pages for the knobs, so that all the knobs control send 1 and 2 on page 1, 3 and 4 on page 2, 5 and 6 on page 3, etc.). But for the basic sends I really don't like having to press a button before turning the knob and I want to use both hands and turn two knobs at the same time. And I don't want to switch between volume and reverb (like one currently has to with Console 1 Fader). Sounds like a small thing, but really isn't. Without that, unfortunately, I think my old Akai APC 40 MK I doesn't need to be replaced.

[@ToddUrban]

Good feedback for the hardware team to consider. I think k one of the things is how to fit the most value into the most efficient workflow and desk space. Fader will have the ability to switch between volume, sends, etc. but won’t have individual knobs on each track just for the 3-6 sends. However, one workflow is that you could keep volume on the faders and sends on the “volume knob” of channel. This isn’t exactly what you are asking for, but a little closer. Anyway, more on Fader coming soon! 😉

[@akagerhard]

@@ToddUrbanThanks for your response, it's good to feel heard. The ability to switch between volume, sends, etc. is already available on the current Console Fader. Having to adjust all sends on one knob (the Knob on Channel) is not good for workflow in my opinion and quite the polar opposite of what I asked for. I'd rather use the faders then, because that way I can at least dial in the send of multiple channels simultaneously and without switching. Obviously, I failed communicating why that is, please allow me to try again: 1. Why there is a need for one dedicated send knob on each track (this is basically already available with Console 1 fader, you just lose your volume control while you do it): Imagine you want to get the relationship of the sends from 2 or more tracks right. If you have a knob for each track you can tweak both simultaneously without having to switch between tracks. This improves efficiency and quality a lot. Because if you have to click on a track and select "send x", there is a lot of back and forth between tracks and your ears don't stay focussed on the sound and your hands don't stay focussed on the knob. This back and forth takes time and keeps you from getting it right - it's also frustrating. If something is easy and pleasant to do, we do it. If the knob is there, we turn it. If you have to first press a button to "route" the correct track to the knob you may not even get the idea to do it. 2. Why there is a need for at least two dedicated send knobs on each track: The same logic as in 1 applies. But this time, instead of imagining having to get the relationship between tracks right, imagine having to get the relationship between two sends right. It's a lot faster and better to turn two knobs at once. You could decrease the delay-send while increasing the reverb-send and would instantly have audible feedback when hitting the sweetspot. It's borderline impossible to do the same while adjusting them one by one, because you'd have to compete with near-infinite realtime combinations by switching back and forth after every slight tweak. Conclusion: Hearing many different combinations takes a fraction of the time if you have 2 knobs. Ideally, you'd have pages for every row of knobs so that you can also adjust sends 2 and 7 at the same time, instead of being limited to specific pairs like 1 and 2, 3 and 4, etc.. Everything above 2 knobs is luxury, I'll give you that. But 2 dedicated knobs for each track that has a fader makes A LOT of sense. You only know how much sense it makes once you experienced it and got used to the workflow. Regarding your point of "desk-space vs workflow": 2 rows of knobs above the faders really don't take away a lot of desk-space. In a situation where one has place for faders, I find it hard to imagine one wouldn't have place for 2 additional rows of knobs above the faders. To me, adding these would be a no-brainer.

[@ToddUrban]

@akagerhard understood and I appreciate your feedback. I’ll make sure the team knows there are people out there that might be looking for something a little bigger to have the ability to tweak 2 sends at a time. 😃

[@akagerhard]

@@ToddUrbanAwesome, thanks!

[@deareeMusic]

having the double eq and comps and the screens, it has everything u need to fly, how many cables does it take to power it? cause I like the single long cable so I can easily move it around my space. Do you know if will be able to use bad native stuff in the effect slots?

[@ToddUrban]

You can bus power it with a single cable! 😃 I think you meant UAD native. At this point, it isn’t available, but I know it’s in constant development.

[@alejandronieves2063]

All the emulations or plugins come with mkiii or you have to buy it apart ?

[@ToddUrban]

Hi. It comes with Core Mixing suite, which gives you tons of different processing. But then there are also different channel strips and plugins that can be added for purchase. You of course can also use UAD plugins and there are always more features coming. 🎉

[@Roman_andtheprey]

Hoping for more daw control with protools soon!

[@ToddUrban]

Yes, as a primarily PT user, I’d love to see Avid do that too!!!

[@Roman_andtheprey]

I understand it's more on the protools end than softube, but hopefully they'll be an accord sometime soon.

[@ToddUrban]

@@Roman_andtheprey I agree!!!

[@LiveFromPFD]

Wonderful video! I am really excited for this upgrade 🤩 What is the MAGMA stand you have the new Console 1 on?

[@ToddUrban]

Ah, that’s a DJ stand I have from 10 years ago for a laptop. I’m not sure if they still make them, but it is a super cool versatile stand that allows all sorts of crazy angles.

[@LiveFromPFD]

@@ToddUrban I would love to know the make/model if possible to find used. I don’t see many stands by them. That’s actually the angle I’d most prefer to use Console 1 😜

[@ToddUrban]

@@LiveFromPFD sorry. There isn’t even a model on it. I don’t even remember where I ordered it, but it was definitely in the US. Try searching DJ laptop stands. I think Ultimate made a similar one at one point. 🤔

[@thatlogicproguy]

Is Layer Mode being replaced by Favorites? I didn't see anything on the User Manual. It is probably going to be reserved for the Fader1 MkII.

[@ToddUrban]

Yes. Favorites replaces layer mode. This helped people move through sessions more quickly and with less mistakes. There were logistical reasons for this switch. But there is now an additional mode that collapses to only tracks that have the C1 plugin. This is super cool, as it is yet another way to speed up workflow.

[@Salantsoundstudios]

Nice!!!

[@ToddUrban]

Thanks for watching Josh! 😃

[@Elink321]

Will these software updates be available on the MKII? It seems very capable of handling these new features.

[@ToddUrban]

Yeah, the new Console 1 plug-in allows much of the new functionality. (The Core Mixing Suite would be a separate purchase for people who want that processing) Of course, if you want the benefit of the improved workflow, you’ll want the new hardware. The redesign of the premium potentiometers, touch sensitivity, response of the screens, new LEDs, ease of switching dual sections, new Tape/Preamp section, etc…. would only be available with the hardware. But the software allows you to access those if needed.

[@G_handle]

@@ToddUrban I know you can't put the cart in front of the horse, but have you used the new Software with the old Hardware? How much of the functionality do we get? From the Mk I & Mk II? Can I Shift+Click to the second Drive, EQ, Comp for example? If I own Tape, do we get access to that slot somehow?

[@ToddUrban]

@G_handle in order to load and control the 2nd slots, you can use the plug-in and a mouse. But from the hardware, you would need the new hardware. The software was really meant to make sure no user was left behind in terms of session compatibility, but also to allow for some tweaking with the mouse when you don’t have the hardware in hand. As of now, Tape from Core mixing suite is all that’s in the Tape/Preamp section. But you know that’s going to grow over time.

[@LoomSoundStudio]

Lovely video Todd, very excited to get my mits on this. Waiting patiently for Fader news lol

[@ToddUrban]

As am I 😉

[@Rhuggins]

I would instantly buy a jogwheel from softube to accompany this...kind of a feature i really wish C1 had. I would just LOVE to jog through tracks, especially since we are limited to ten at a time with one fader unit. Wish I could reassign the Volume knob on C1 MK2 to scroll tracks (I have C1 fader for volume and DAW volume). Some type of functionality like this would literally allow us to "fly" through our sessions, as opposed to clicking around - or what most of us do - click with our mouse to select a track and then use C1. I reassigned the assignable buttons on C1 to scroll tracks but you cant press and hold to move through a session...this is the one thing we are missing to really and truly DITCH the mouse. Try to envision what that would allow one to do for a moment...especially with the added functionality of MKIII.

[@ToddUrban]

Hmm. It’s a different type of DAW functionality you are talking about, but I agree that type of control would be great. I’m sure the team is watching the comments. 👀

[@mitzthegamer]

Do I add the console 1 on pre or post insert in cubase for mixing ?

[@ToddUrban]

I would think for a console style flow that you would want them pre fader so that the processing takes place first and the fader acts as your balance. Otherwise your fader would alter the gain staging into console 1, which would affect the tape/preamp, shape, drive, and compressor sections since they are level dependent processors.

[@mitzthegamer]

@@ToddUrban thank you very much

[@arlandajim]

Are the knob caps metallic or plastic conductive ? As long as they are touch sensitive, they might conduct electricity, don’t they ?

[@ToddUrban]

They aren’t metal. I assume they are some type of plastic, but they have a totally different (more premium feel) than the previous generation. I believe they just sense pressure when touched. But that isn’t my area to give you the proper answer. I’d need to check with Softube! 😉

[@arlandajim]

Thank you @@ToddUrban

[@aloerecordz]

Thanks. Is the new console one works with only one cable or it needs to be power supply?

[@ToddUrban]

If you are using a laptop, it should be able to be bus powered depending on how much power the laptop puts out. I’ve found that it works perfectly with my MacBook Pro. But there is an included PSU if needed.

[@aloerecordz]

Very usefull to know. Thanks U 🙏

[@ChrisDv849]

looks amazing. I've been looking for the new features in the latest update (2.5.71), can't find any information on what and how to use, not on the website, not on KZbin. I bought an console 1 and fader few months ago, I asked Softube if they offer an upgrade - sent in my device and pay extra for the new one. Feeling kind a off f*cked now :(

[@ToddUrban]

The latest update is great with the Mk II. It is a little nicer look and looks the recall between different generations. (Plus you can tweak and swap plugins in the plug-in GUI using a mouse if you only have a Mk II) But for me, the Mk III hardware makes the loading of the sections even a little nicer with the dual buttons underneath each section.

[@royalemuzikproductionz]

Hi guys I’ve just downloaded and installed the newest update. But I still got 2 gui’s does anyone have a video link to using the new gui with the mk2? Cheers . I’m thinking 🤔 it would be more sensible to be using just only the new interface

[@ToddUrban]

You are seeing the old plug-in when you open it? Or are you talking about the OSD? The OSD still has the same layout, but with an updated look. But the plug-in will show all the new sections in a scrolling window. Maybe if it didn’t install correctly, try deleting it in Softube Central and reinstalling. If it still isn’t working, that’s odd and you should let support know since it sounds like something isolated to your computer.

[@conrow1157]

how can I use the different sections with the old console 1 hardware?

[@ToddUrban]

If you mean the dual sections, you would need to open up the plug-in GUI with a mouse to add a second section. To me it is nice to keep all within one plugin. However the real value is the compatibility between Mk II and III users so everyone can share the same sections and know the projects will open, alter, and save correctly.

[@conrow1157]

@@ToddUrban thanks. Would be nice, if you could install a shift to 2nd section function. 🙌

[@ToddUrban]

@conrow1157 yeah. I don’t know the details about why or why not that might work. Sometimes when I ask details about product ideas that seem easy, I find out there are tons of ramifications from what seems like a simple idea. An example would be auto makeup gain override. If it wasn’t implemented in a perfect way, it could destroy people’s sessions. But they found a way to offer it while still protecting old sessions, which is key. I know there is more coming, but not sure what’s next! 😉

[@bosiiiiiiiiii]

​@@ToddUrban Nice video! And this is exactly the question I would like to ask! Since Softube plugins are not cheap, but update quiet few times. Like Console 1 plugin version got a "useful" GUI some many years later until now,, The new Core Mixing Suite needs to paid for upgrade and not fully support old model actually surprised me. Maybe I sound like a hater but I'm not, just a long term user hope the hardware and plugin works well🙌I got a new suggestion for plugin GUI,, --- Can It always shows output meter like the console 1 screen display view do? Other Softube plugins like Weiss or TAPE also have a output side penal , easier for gain match. Plugin view needs to fold some window or scroll through or resize into smaller shape which are not very pleased to use. And I'd love to have a RTA on EQ like C1screen display view do🙏

[@ToddUrban]

@@bosiiiiiiiiii Thank you for your comment. The Core Mixing Suite comes with the new Console 1 Channel Mk III hardware. You do not lose the SSL 4000 channel strip if you were using the old one. This is an additional title that you get. The new hardware also works great. It is a totally new feel with premium components. I think you will love it, as everyone has so far that I've spoken to. Regarding the plug-in when you don't use the hardware, the purpose of it is more to allow users to make some basic adjustments when they don't have the hardware available. Console 1 will always work best with the hardware, as that is the entire purpose, to get that hands on feel when mixing. I'm sure there will be some additional updates to the plug-in as the product develops. This is a brand new release and the company is going to keep working to make the experience better. I hope that helps answer some of your questions. :)

[@southkak48]

my mk3 stop connecting to software after unplugging usb and plugging back in. I tried re-installing everything still no connection. If I plug in my mk2 it connects. I tried searching the internet and reaching out to softube (slow response). anyone else having this issue?

[@ToddUrban]

Hmm. No issues like that on my end. Are you connecting directly without a hub? That should help. But definitely connect with Softube support, as they will be able to look further into what the issue might be.

[@southkak48]

@@ToddUrban got a ticket in. thanks

[@paulmistygatz7888]

I love the looks but I never found console1 faster for my workflow. Maybe cooler or maybe more fun. But not faster. It’s too restricted by concept which is a good thing but it’s impossible to NOT use your DAW, too. When you have a great template in your DAW then you don’t have to do much tweaking anyway.

[@ToddUrban]

I appreciate your feedback. I do find it faster. Part of it is the workflow of having your tools right there without needing to click inserts for each channel. But the other part is the tactile feel. I don’t look at the screen much and instead focus on the sound while tracking knobs. But yes, you are right. You cannot literally lose some work in the DAW such as editing. But for me, the mix is almost 100% on the hardware these days. 😉

[@jroz8111]

Does this work with protools?

[@ToddUrban]

Yes. But in the current state, you need to understand that it controls the plug-in in Pro Tools, and not the DAW. So volume, solo/mute, and pan happen at the plug-in level, rather than controlling the DAW fader. For me this is fine. I actually like the 2nd level of gain staging. All of the EQ, Shape, Comp, etc is at the plug-in level too, just like any other DAW.

[@jroz8111]

Thank you brother really helps @@ToddUrban

[@G_handle]

@@ToddUrban Hey Todd, I've been Console 1 since the beginning (you and I have met at NAMM) when Mk I was over $1000 and made in Sweden. The "DAW Control" functions came later, and Are pretty amazing (especially in Reaper), but within the PT universe a lot people consider the lack of these bonus features as a "Deal Breaker". Now, I also (unfortunately) always have ProTools around as an occupational hazard. And I completely agree with your statement about having a 2nd level of gain staging. Just like Every Other Plugin people own. It can be hard to explain to people that, having the DAW control as an option, doesn't necessarily mean that you should Take that option. Gain Staging your static mix within the Console 1 plugin, while leaving the DAW Faders at Unity allows for an easy Automation pass down the line. Now, having Console 1 sync Track Name, Track Number, and Track Color are far more important to me. The workaround for that though, is building Console 1 into your Template, which you're likely going to do anyways. Loading Console 1 as the First plugin in your chain, the Last, or sandwiched between other plugins Also all come with different implications. So, what do you think about doing a Video walking people through the various ways to set it up and the pros and cons of different strategies?

[@ToddUrban]

@G_handle yeah, it might be a good idea to do a video on that. I’m also waiting to see how the product developed over time. Just like the original, you know there will be more features and deeper DAW control as partnerships and the product grows. 😃

[@bosiiiiiiiiii]

​@@ToddUrban I use PT too, and find that if I insert through such as 50 tracks, the track order will mess up, and a known situation is Console1 track order won't follow PT track order. But sometimes I find if I restart the PT session, console1 will re-order the tracks and sometimes will follow the PT session correctly. Is there any tricks inside of it?

[@edwardcolon8614]

I get that it's DAW agnostic but do you know if it will control third-party plugins?

[@ToddUrban]

As of now, it allows Console 1 channel strips, Softube plugins, and UAD-2 plugins.

[@edwardcolon8614]

A DAW controller that is DAW agnostic is nothing new. What would be a game changer is if it were also plugin agnostic. @@ToddUrban

[@ToddUrban]

@@edwardcolon8614 well, it will keep developing, so let’s see what happens.

[@moonlik1795]

The native UAD too?@@ToddUrban

[@ToddUrban]

@@moonlik1795 At this point it is UAD-2 that is supported. Softube knows there is a user demand to also load and control UADx products. However, it apparently isn't as easy as "just mapping them" as many people think. I know there are tons of new features in the works to keep advancing the product, so I'll keep my eyes open and see what happens in the coming months.

[@ChrisDv849]

still no UADx compatibility :(

[@ToddUrban]

Not at the moment. But the product isn’t even out to the public yet. More is coming, as the product is a start to a new generation of development.

[@patricioandres2562]

For believers, a recommendation. Use this company's "after-sales service" first, and then choose,... Also, unless you are very bad at making music or mixing, you don't need all these distractions,... Record well, that will help your workflow,... Not fighting with HW or software,...

[@ToddUrban]

I’m not really sure what issue you had, as you didn’t identify any problems. Yes, I agree, recording properly is always important. But to me and many others, Console 1 is essential to working in the mix stage. It gives the tools you need, but with the hands on control to make the process faster and more musical.

[@fosiko123]

I’m trying my best to comprehend what you actually saying; you’re not making any sensible comment or point. What’s your main issue with the console in simple language!! 😮

[@ToddUrban]

@@fosiko123 I don’t think I have any issue with Console 1 Channel. I’m thrilled with the workflow and in the video showcase some of the reasons I think it is so valuable to my workflow. 🧐 Did you watch the video?

[@fosiko123]

@@ToddUrban 😂 my response is not for you ; is ti the @Patriciohayes response to ur video !!! Todd ; I love yr video and I have watched it many times on new console one and already pre- order one at Sweetwater 😀; haven’t arrived yet ; I have fewer questions thou regarding the console one user but have fewer soft tube plugin’s

[@ToddUrban]

@@fosiko123 ah… that makes more sense. 😂 I didn’t see what comment your response was connected to. Yeah, I don’t know what it is the other commenter was trying to state. Anyway, thanks for clarifying. 😃

[@MrStubat]

Such a shame it's still got the 1995 GUI and you can't access the plugins GUI. and again we don't want a video on what a plugin does. And on UA Console the inputs you've hidden on UA Console come up in the Console 1 GUI. Really frustrating if you're not using 8 ADAT channels so the faders on Console 1 Fader don't follow Console. seriously guys for the top Dollar you've got on these you really need to sort out some basic problems. ever wonder why there's so many on the second hand market. and again we don't want a video and how to mix or choose reverb sounds,

[@ToddUrban]

I appreciate your feedback here. The benefit that most Console 1 users share with me that helps their workflow is that you do not see the GUI of the loaded plug-in. Instead, you get more direct feedback of exactly what is going on sonically so you are listening to what is going on, rather than being influenced with your eyes. But I know some people want to see a GUI, and in those cases, it is best to use the plug-ins as an insert if you find the GUI inspiring or creative. I personally need to work as efficiently as possible to make deadlines, so for me, the OSD is way faster.

[@patricioandres2562]

What stupidity (a lie), I already had mk1 and mk2 and I only had bad times and the "attention" of a company that invents that it has the best in the world when it doesn't,... I say this as a Consumer who was one of its "products ",.,...