Tom Hanks Reveals That Sophie is the Secret | The Da Vinci Code (Ian McKellen)

[@Libertyfudge]

My dad got angry at ending where the Priory tells Sophie they’re here to protect her and have always protected her; “what have you been doing this whole movie? She hasn’t been protected!”

[@traintrack3761]

Good question.

[@Bduh2]

My late wife and I LOVED this movie because we visited The Louvre and saw a few of the things you see in the film. It would be nice if some of this would be true, but it's just a movie.

[@100Dwarf]

It's a movie. They have compiled many facts to a truth, but not the truth.

[@roner61]

It’s a book, the movie comes later. BTW…the Bible it’s also a book.

[@robertjones8819]

Wanting it to be true is, I suspect, an almost universal response, that's why the movie is so popular.

[@arklinmike]

Allegedly... 😉🙃

[@vfxsoup]

I worked on this movie and it was an amazing experience. I’m glad you both enjoyed it.

[@bobguy6542]

23andME would've really ruined everything these people worked for.

[@robertjones8819]

Lol, you bastard... pissed myself laughing at one.

[@Jimmy_Bee]

Likely why it was invented and given to the public in the first place.

[@Canadianvoice]

Would love to see any proof that Jesus ever existed.

[@FoolOverride]

@@Canadianvoice There was a Jesus, but whether he was a Son of God is another story. Non-biblical records prove that ***A*** jesus existed, but thats it.

[@pikkagtr1942]

@@FoolOverride of course he existed, all his descendants live in Mexico, I know at least 6 of them

[@leisastalnaker3790]

I actually love this movie. Haters, suck it.

[@Rage867]

In the book it is very stressed that to become a member of the group protecting the grail meant you had to prove your worth. It is shown in the movie by everyone showing up, with the idea they were there to stop or even harm the main characters. But instead they waited to see if those searching actually followed the clues and knew the truth. I huge shot to the book.

[@FreshlySnipes]

Where TF have “the protectors” been for the past week?? Lmao

[@livingonthetyne]

Protecting the old lady i guess, the young lass was probably MIA until langdon brought her into the mix

[@Libertyfudge]

My dad had the same reaction when we watched for the first time

[@Taylor___]

I loved how the secrets of Christianity were hidden under a rug in a church accessible by the public

[@horseradish4046]

after all the puzzles and deadly mysteries, the entire Priory of Scion secret is laid out behind a "private" sign and a small unguarded chain

[@elskid206]

I would never allow us to both go down that cellar allowing someone to close that hatch and never be found again.

[@robmcdonnell2107]

Langdon in the crypt, 3 minutes earlier, "You are the last living descendant of Jesus Christ!". Old lady, "I am your grandmother!" Therefore logic dictates that Sophie is definitely NOT the last living descendant of JC, merely the youngest of the last 2. QED

[@lawrencerobledo560]

Not if she married into the family, she would have the family name but not the blood lineage

[@scottselover7613]

Or she’s not the grandmother from that side of the family

[@ToeTag1968]

To be fair, Langdon didn't know about grandma. Sophie thought her family was all dead at that point.

[@MikeKollin]

OR she's a liar!

[@FernandoLozano-oz7to]

I thought the same, i want to believe that the grandmother does not have sang real blood

[@levistoner]

3:22 - a real “now you’s can’t leave” vibes, amiright?

[@andrewreed4216]

1. The kailedy gospel 2. Acts 29 3. The fisher kings 4. The French royalty 5. The nemenhah records (around page 500 shows the descendants of christ in france and other relativesin England). Its a native American record.

[@wrinkleneckbass]

Dan Brown’s book is just a rehash of Holy Blood Holy Grail, which was a rehash of L'Or de Rennes, which was a rehash of a story that’s been around for centuries. Someday it will be rehashed for a new generation and they will think it’s new.

[@BrotherSalsa]

Great movie! And even better book

[@jeffmisch1485]

The books are always better. It's extremely hard to pack 600 plus pages into 2 hrs.

[@japankasasagi]

Mmm, I think that Sophie is better in the movie. In the book, she's just another normal human; in the movie, it hints that she does have extraordinary abilities.

[@Treesinus]

Thank you for everyone who Played a vital role to keep light pulsating.. and being kind enough to see the good in a lost soul. Proving love conquers all and breathing life back into something that meant the world to me .. for everyone who kept track and who played.. it has been the greatest adventure To track Feet prints in the sands of time.. through Invisible words and Interpretation.. through pictures and Bad feelings about it.. for daring to believe and be brave.. no matter what .. i loved the presents .. and gift horses.. the Creative righting and Learning to love the unknown.. Im absolutely grateful

[@spex76]

Always struck me that this movie and the concept is pointless. Ian McKellen character mentions that the Bible was changed to make Jesus divine. But if Jesus isn't God, then the apostles, Mary and the "Grail" are unimportant because Jesus was only human.

[@denerobbins6563]

No one else wanna question how a sarcophagus would fit down that tiny trap door? cause you have to assume it's the only way in and out of that room as it's a very secret room

[@jameswright6955]

The crypt may have been there and the chapel built afterwards on top..

[@denerobbins6563]

@@jameswright6955 Ok, but I don't think you've thought this through all the way through now, have you? My point wasn't really about how it got in that room; it was more about the size of the hatch door. Yes, your theory would be correct; they probably built the room around it. But then explain how they moved it from that room to a crypt under the Louvre, which was shown at the end of the movie. That was more my point.

[@Fitchy-ke3wz]

​@denerobbins6563 light is able to get down there. Therefore I say "trapdoor that's bigger"

[@danieldonnelly3589]

@@denerobbins6563why so snarky?

[@zp8771]

​@@denerobbins6563​ if you want to be technical, Rosslyn Chapel was built AFTER the Louvre Palace. The Louvre, however, did not become "The Louvre" until the 18th century. Either way, it's not impossible to remove or rearrange masonry and so it's entirely possible that they widened the door to get it out. Don't be a condescending butthead.

[@michaelhayden725]

When you first see these scenes you do not know who all those people were who were arriving “out of the blue”? That they were actually there to protect her only comes out at the end!

[@fincrazydragon]

If they tested Mary's DNA, it would only prove she's a descendant of Mary, not Jesus. Only Jesus' DNA could prove that.

[@jasonspellich2440]

Shroud has DNA right?

[@Morfe02]

yeah but they cant make a DNA test of 1967 years old emmm bodies ? objects ? that is just funny

[@jasonspellich2440]

@@Morfe02 could still find something, half life is like 600 years 🤷

[@jeronp420]

Good thing it's just a movie and not real right

[@chaosomega623]

They actually have the literal blood of Christ kept in vials by the Catholic Church, other denomination Churches may have this too

[@ericcascaden1901]

Yes excellent read

[@daniellemurphy3910]

Even if she were a descendant of Christ after two thousand years of dilution the blood line would be almost non-existent.

[@zazuch]

in genetics yes mostly but the paperwork/documents would prove it. Assuming they didnt go missing or some how get discredited lol.

[@TheHookemhornman]

That’s not really how dna works. There would be exact same sequences. The biggest hole in the argument is proving Mary had Jesus’ baby. But this is nonfiction for a reason.

[@jeremygoldenberg9617]

Mitochondrial DNA isn't diluted.

[@paulantrobus9235]

It's just a film....

[@zazuch]

@@paulantrobus9235 you are real fun at parties i bet! lol. People can have hypothetical discussions about what if situations etc. Nothing everything has to be historcially and precisely within bounds of physics lol.

[@kennethillingworth8613]

In the book both children servived

[@KaylayaKasintaya]

It's been suggested/ hinted at that the young man in the beginning is her brother.

[@cesarj4445]

No logro comprender aún...Sophie va a realizar el mismo ritual que el de su falso abuelo?!

[@zuzolesingiswa]

No she won't. That ritual is for pegans who wanted to reach Transcendence. She doesn't have to because she is royal blood, the direct descendant of Jesus Christ

[@maccc9828]

Hi Can someone please explain to me why this movie was "honored" a Razzie Award-nomination?

[@SvastaNesto-j2o]

because it's really bad, especially in comparison how good the book was.

[@Morfe02]

i mean is kinda funny how "subtle" they are with the anti-christian message is like you cant make it more obvious

[@nap0920]

@@Morfe02 you mean the hatred and the violence? I mean it's spot on...

[@lorrietsaoussis5168]

Can u imagine being told ur the descendant of Jesus christ that would make urbhead spin

[@michaeldew7904]

I think all this was in the script. Tom Hanks didn't do anything.

[@jadedbrad]

How many men didn’t have children in olden days?

[@SwatantraNandanwar]

Hang on where did it say that Jesus had offspring? Did he marry or was it an affair?

[@Necrotic99]

Keep in mind that this movie is a work of fiction. The writer based his story off the gospel of philip which was found in 1945 and talks about jesus kissing Mary (as in mary magdalene). then you just make a conspiracy around it with the church suppressing the knowledge of it, especially considering that the bible were picked by the church to be canonical so who would know what wasn't picked.

[@SwatantraNandanwar]

@Necrotic99 Old and New Testament ...all lies I tell you.! All make believe. Creative story telling!

[@audiomachine312]

​@@Necrotic99"This movie is a work of fiction" as opposed to the Bible which is full of facts of course. The interesting part is that if it was true and there was an offspring of Jesus, the Church would probably hunt them down and kill them. It is based on real clerical behavior throughout the years. So other than the idea of the child of Jesus, the rest is not so much a conspiracy

[@Snowdragon.]

So what would you do once you found out that you are related to JC ? It changes your life and beliefs real quick !

[@Tremaine-e3o]

Call Dawn, The Dawn whom hit Tremaine A Williamson - Holt in her neck with a white plastic chair when Bernard Hills was marrying her, Lucifer.

[@tigdogsbody]

Although Hank’s character does not speak French, Italian, ancient Greek, or Latin, he is an expert in iconography. Hank’s character strikes me as a fraud.

[@scottblakey1603]

Fiction. Characters.

[@jimpikoulis6726]

Look, I can't chill with these clips...

[@SheyD78]

What would it be like to hear that. "You are the last living decendent of Jesus Christ" How much would it change you and your perspective on life? Talk about heavy.

[@alainmcin]

Awesome movie....this version is as believable as the Roman Catholic religion

[@tonyf.9806]

Funny thing is, the book and the movie are far more logical and believable than the actual religion if your read the bible using critical thinking and looking for holes in it, in addition to what we know about history and power. Theoretically, if marrying, making love, and having children was the secret to heaven, and if Jesus actually did have a child, do you honestly think the church would ever let that information get out. The catholic church alone is very rich, and requires people to believe that only though them can you have "life after death", even if there actually isn't anything after we die. Another word for all this, is cult. Many of the historical examples are wrong, either in when they happened or how, but much of it is true. Either way, decent thought experiment. If you were to find out your entire religion was a lie, everything you believed in about it, and it was all for others to obtain riches and power, would you turn away from it or continue believing, even with all the hard evidence you could ever imagine telling you it's a sham. What would you do.

[@audiomachine312]

That's why people usually become atheists. That is the very reason, they acknowledge that it is all for power.

[@sst-du9bz]

Actually the book, and by extension the movie, is not logical or believable at all. The entirety of “Da Vinci code” is based on this priory of sion which in itself is a hoax. Do a quick Google search then read the book again and you’ll see what kind of nonsense the whole thing is. Not a Christian here, I’m just speaking in terms of realism. Yes I know Browns books are fantasy but at least “angels and demons” was somewhat based on actual facts which made it easier to roll with his very far fetched conclusion. Da Vinci code on the other hand is based on a scam.

[@erik3371]

Coins.

[@TheFiown]

Casting Amelie Poulain as Sophie was a huge mistake.

[@andrewmgodden]

You have no idea what you are talking about!!! Audrey Tautou plays Sophie!!! Did you even watch the movie!!!!! 🙄

[@TheFiown]

@@andrewmgodden Audrey Tautou played Amelie Poulain in the movie of the same name here in France and people didn't understand why they chose her for the role of Sophie. I suppose that because of Amelie Poulain she was 'bankable', they put her in this. So YES I do know what I am talking about thank you. Have a nice evening.

[@andrewmgodden]

@@TheFiown Such an outstanding display of intellectual dysfunction!!! 🤣 This video and comment thread is about The Da Vinci Code directed by Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks and Audrey Tautou. As you now elaborate, Amelia Poulain is a character from another movie, but still not an actress. So, to your original comment, "Casting Amelia Poulain as Sophie....." Is just nonsensical. If you want to make a comment, try using the actual name of the actress, that is the name people recognise her by. This is the internet, it is global, and some obscure French foreign art and language film means very little outside of France. As for Audrey Tautou being "bankable", are you serious!!! 🙄 This film was based on one of the biggest selling novels of 2003, outsold only by J. K. Rowling's, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix". This fact and Tom Hanks in the lead role is what made the film "bankable". Enjoy living in your little bubble world of isolation where only you know what you are talking about and where you refer to real people by characters they play in various movies. The rest of us are living in the world of reality. We can only hope you do not represent the future of the human species.

[@andrewmgodden]

@@TheFiown Oh what a surprise, my reply to you has been deleted. So, for the record, here it is again, albeit precised. Referring to an actress by the name of a fictional character she portrayed in an obscure French foreign art and language film, or any other movie for that matter, as you have done, is just totally nonsensical. In the world of the global internet, that which exists outside France, people refer to actors and actresses by their name, not some fictions character they have played in other movies. The novel was one of the highest selling novels of 2003, outsold only by J. K. Rowling's, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. This combined with Tom Hanks in the lead role is what made the film "bankable", not the casting of Audrey Tautou in the role of Sophie. In claiming you know what you are talking about, you might want to try demonstrating some intellectually logical evidence of that! 🙄

[@TheFiown]

@@andrewmgodden Well I didn't and couldn't 'delete' your reply for one. Secondly here in France Tautou is always referred to as Amelie Poulain or at least used to be around the years the movie came out as if often the case when actors play iconic roles. I didn't say that the movie was bankable because of Tautou but that she was as is often the case in Hollywood when an actor or actress has a big success they rush to profit from that and put them quickly into other movies straight away before they have time to be forgotten. In claiming you know what you are talking about, you might want to try demonstrating some intellectually logical evidence of that! Have a nice day any which way. This reply does not need another 'reply'.

[@NaturalBornLowlander]

Two French people speaking English with eachother. Not very believable😄😄

[@PowerHouseWash]

Poorly written, and Tom Hanks doesn't help. It's one of Hanks worst films.

[@davidabulafia7145]

Is the girl real name Sophie Christ? Jesus Christ descendant.

[@Not_sheeple]

Hey Hanks,.....you still in USA....... Why?!

[@chadsnyder301]

What does this mean?

[@Not_sheeple]

@chadsnyder301 he said he's leaving USA if Trump wins the election. So I hope to hear that he made good on his promise.

[@jacksonbooth2462]

While his politics may suck, Tom Hanks is nevertheless a brilliant actor, maybe even the GOAT.

[@1utube01]

Anything is better than a MAGA idiot.

[@PrincessofErised]

If you are a Trump felony rapist supporter, then YOU suck.

[@MG6960]

His politics are fine. You suck

[@KGBuller-d8g]

Or maybe yours suck? Who cares? To each, their own. He is a fine actor.

[@carloangelozack2374]

Hanks, and much of the world are in the light. Those voting for an adjudicated r*****, insurrectionist, and pathological liar is the dark side. There’s no argument against the truth. And, Hanks is far from the best actor. Top 10 but not top 5.

[@kensteel9872]

Jesus had no offspring Died a virgin at 33 Ascended into Heaven Was God in flesh Repent

[@EVAUnit4A]

Jesus was an amalgamation of several wise Jewish men at that time advocating along parallels for peace, _not_ the Son of an unnoticed God.

[@michaelmeyer2725]

Depends on what versions of the Gospels you choose to believe. Unfortunately, lots of differing opinions were suppressed in the middle ages. I for one completely believe that Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene were husband and wife and had children. The Church doesn't want you to believe that.

[@gwenwittaker5145]

​@EVAUnit4A Jesus lived and walked this earth. There is more proof of this than many historical figures you take for granted as real. He fulfilled at least 33 prophecies concerning the days leading up to his crucifixion alone. He had no descendants (also prophesied : Isaiah 53) The Bible is true. Jesus said he is the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Him.

[@EVAUnit4A]

@@gwenwittaker5145 ...Said the blind man to nobody.

[@gwenwittaker5145]

@@EVAUnit4A How clever.

[@kensteel9872]

What a sacrilegious pos movie

[@andrewmgodden]

Oh yes, let us all burn in hell, because someone dared write a novel which presents a fictitious storyline about the possibility of Christ having descendants. In the modern world, this is the thinking of Neanderthals when at the same time you ignore the crimes committed by the Christian churches over the centuries in pursuit of pushing their dogma. I am a Christian, but I am also intelligent and open minded enough to challenge the teachings of my religion in pursuit of strengthening my faith. Blind faith is ignorance. If this means I am destined to burn in the fires of eternal damnation, I look to seeing you there. 🙄

[@daniellemurphy3910]

Even if she were a descendant of Christ after two thousand years of dilution the blood line would be almost non-existent.

[@Morfe02]

only matters for the women to control the church is the whole point of the movie´s message (patriarchy bad) and is kinda funny after a real women gobs xDD ejem Kamala or even if you search Argentina, or England LOL finally i got to say the idea of Mary having a tomb is damn funny because i dont see a skeleton surviving 1967 years for a DNA test

[@michaelhayden725]

King Charles III is descended from Queen Victoria and through her to King George I back in 1720 ( or thereabouts). Yes Charles is King (of the United Kingdom) but what percentage of George’s blood does he carry? It does not really matter, that percentage is enough! So it’s the same for Sophie!