I enjoyed the pointed questions, and it was great to get straight to the point with Tom, who has such insight on these topics.
@GilesMcRiker Жыл бұрын
There aren't many interviewers who do as much prep work and really dig their teeth into the intellectual influences of their guests
@RegiumGroup8 ай бұрын
The mention of Cricket actually kept me in this conversation.. other than the fact that Holland is just such an amazing explainer of history!
@markwalker5948 Жыл бұрын
What a wonderful conversation. Thank you both very much fellas.
@warmcoffee226 Жыл бұрын
Really strong interviewer. Came for Holland subscribed for him. Loved this interview. That Bryron question was incredible
@doyle6000 Жыл бұрын
I will be listening to The Rest is History more from now on!!
@MichaelWilliams-ph4ri6 ай бұрын
8:30 It is interesting that in the 'a thousand years' verse, there is no article 'a' in the Greek, nor the number one, and further the word 'thousand' along with 'years' is actually in the plural. So properly it is multiple (at least 2) 'thousands years'.
@alexgibson2871 Жыл бұрын
fascinating question on Paul's letter to the Galatians and the roots of liberalism.
@eveningprimrose3088 Жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this interview very much. To the points, and eclectically informative.
@user-sn9pz9ng6v Жыл бұрын
I liked the short questions. Period.
@gregorytoews8316 Жыл бұрын
Why? It's jerky and rough, and prevents flow.
@doyle6000 Жыл бұрын
@@gregorytoews8316 yes, I did kind of find Tyler's questioning a bit abrupt, and that he doesn't really engage with the answers.
@tuckerbugeater Жыл бұрын
@@doyle6000 it's an hour interview
@doyle6000 Жыл бұрын
@@tuckerbugeater yes, the questions are still short and abrupt, Tom just talks for a long time
@Bhadradd Жыл бұрын
Very good presentation. Totally support your views, brother.
@ropeburnsrussell9 ай бұрын
For some reason, im surprised that historians feel nostalgia. Tom, i like you even more now. Pro hedgehog all the way!
@johnhaynes9910 Жыл бұрын
Excellent interview :)
@justforfunlol2258 Жыл бұрын
Why didn't you ask him about Zendaya
@johncarroll772 Жыл бұрын
Elisha and the cuddly Bears is one of my favourite Bible stories.
@almilligan7317 Жыл бұрын
Amazing how much Christianity, Judaism, and Islam owes to the Persian Zoroastrianism and the Ahora Mazda, the good religion.
@bartolo498 Жыл бұрын
22:00 I think that this is one of the typological inversions/relativizations that makes the OT progressive in some ways. The natural order is that power/inheritance goes to the firstborn but God choses whom he elects/blesses and inverts the natural order. Conflict often arises between the natural order and the divine election. Isaac is the younger (although from the main wife), Jacob is the younger (and a deceiver), Joseph is the youngest but one, Moses is younger than his two mentioned siblings, David is the youngest of many sons. It's probably related to the other frequent inversion of nature, namely the infertile woman/couple having an unexpected but special child: Isaac, Samson, Samuel, John the Baptist, also (according to legend, Mary) and, in a sense, Jesus if one goes with the tradition that Mary had taken a vow of virginity and Joseph was an older man who had agreed to a formal marriage without intention for intercourse and procreation.
@rontimus Жыл бұрын
It's great to hear Tom address the Zoroastrian viewpoint (38:50), and how they moralized everything... Did you know that NIETZSCHE titled his epic "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" (and not "Thus Spoke Jesus" or "Thus Spoke Moses") because he viewed the Persians as the FIRST to make the MISTAKE of moralizing everything? Even though Nietzsche's book is full of references to the Bible (where he attempts to correct biblical morality), it's central character is a "reformed" Zoroaster who abandons his moralizing that Tom so excellently explains here.
@doyle6000 Жыл бұрын
that's interesting, thanks
@MichaelWilliams-ph4ri Жыл бұрын
54:41 The church is there to inform the state when it gets out of alignment with the 'line of thought' that originated those things in the first place. The state will always try to be God, and it must be reigned in or all the freedoms you value will vaporize.
@hglundahl Жыл бұрын
7:18 _"it wasn't included in the canon of the New Testament in the Orthodox Church until the _*_tenth_*_ Century"_ That's not from historic sources, Mr. Holland, it's from conversations with nincompoops who managed to be competent _sounding_ to you! The last recorded NT canon (outside ultra-weird things like Cathars) without an Apocalypse (if that is even true) is from the Council of Laodicaea, 353 or sth .... since Pope St. Damasus, all Apostolic Churches have recognised the Apocalypse.
@donalfoley24125 ай бұрын
Good interviewer. No idea where he stands. Agnostic, atheist, evangelical? Catholic? Just a good interviewer who posed good questions. I’ll check him out later .
@hglundahl Жыл бұрын
7:51 You are reading things into St. Augustine. He certainly does take a stance against one thing which could be seen as Apocalypse Literalism, i e Millennialism, and I share that. We are not heading for the Millennium, we are heading towards its end. But apart from that, _City of God_ is about as literalistic about the Apocalypse as _Left Behind._ It's also as literalistic about Genesis as Kent Hovind, apart from the six days of Creation. Actually not sure if City of God even mentioned his own preference (De Genesi ad Litteram Libri XII + Confessions do mention it) for a one moment creation.
@hglundahl Жыл бұрын
I am happy to hear of the hedgehog!
@Yogryph Жыл бұрын
finally, the tom holland i've been searching for. it's about time we got something
@insiderinside1905 Жыл бұрын
Holland hasn’t understood evangelical and Quaker abolitionism as explicitly rooted in the bible: Just Read exodus 21:16 where the death penalty is prescribed for “man-stealing” (the Old Testament word for slave trading). He’s only trivially correct with regard to diction.
@michaelandrewsalomonenewje41076 ай бұрын
Was Elizabeth II descended from Alfred The Great, or more the Hanoverians, or both?
@johncarroll772 Жыл бұрын
Like Tom's use of Del Boy language
@williamfarmer5154 Жыл бұрын
Mr. Holland seems to be a fan of the Papal revolution, but it has to be admitted that this was the primary cause of the Great Schism.
@donalfoley24125 ай бұрын
Did Britain become a nation because of the 2 world wars? Why was Wales ignored?
@michaelandrewsalomonenewje41076 ай бұрын
Complicated or not, put Ireland back together. I have no vested interest other than justice and to be relieved of hearing of their struggle for 800 years.
@johncarroll772 Жыл бұрын
Peppa Pigs brother George is based on Tom.
@robmckay5421 Жыл бұрын
I am amazed at Tom Holland's knowledge of the Bible considering that he is an atheist.
@Denisemariee2u Жыл бұрын
I don't think he is an atheist any longer
@Hbmd3E9 ай бұрын
@@Denisemariee2uHe is considering himself as christian, but its kinda cultural christian I guess. He have not experienced miraculous and doesnt believe it. ( Jesus divinity I guess,.. he would like to believe or so ..) Because due his work in History study, he realized that almost all values we have even things like secularity and rights are rising from the Christianity
@wolfa51518 ай бұрын
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool.
@michaelandrewsalomonenewje41076 ай бұрын
Yes, well I don’t think Catholic or protestant should be the main issue anymore unless Britain is hundreds of years behind the times.
@michaelandrewsalomonenewje41076 ай бұрын
Give Northern Ireland, Ulster, back to the Irish, make it part of the Republic of Ireland. Ifto stop hearing the belly aching. It’s one island. Instruct them how to get along and be free and just to each other. The rest of the island of Britain you can leave how it is. So endeth the lesson.
@peterbarker8249 Жыл бұрын
...ahhhhh, The briti'sh..... 😮
@doyle6000 Жыл бұрын
Don't you mean "Bri'ish"?
@Hbmd3E9 ай бұрын
@@doyle6000thats eauiful
@hglundahl Жыл бұрын
7:51 You are reading things into St. Augustine. He certainly does take a stance against one thing which could be seen as Apocalypse Literalism, i e Millennialism, and I share that. We are not heading for the Millennium, we are heading towards its end. But apart from that, _City of God_ is about as literalistic about the Apocalypse as _Left Behind._ It's also as literalistic about Genesis as Kent Hovind, apart from the six days of Creation. Actually not sure if City of God even mentioned his own preference (De Genesi ad Litteram Libri XII + Confessions do mention it) for a one moment creation.
@donalfoley24125 ай бұрын
Good interviewer. No idea where he stands. Agnostic, atheist, evangelical? Catholic? Just a good interviewer who posed good questions. I’ll check him out later .
@michaelandrewsalomonenewje41076 ай бұрын
Complicated or not, put Ireland back together. I have no vested interest other than justice and to be relieved of hearing of their struggle for 800 years.
@michaelandrewsalomonenewje41076 ай бұрын
Yes, well I don’t think Catholic or protestant should be the main issue anymore unless Britain is hundreds of years behind the times.