Top 10 Differences Between 1991 and 2017 Beauty and the Beast

Top 10 Differences Between 1991 and 2017 Beauty and the Beast // Subscribe: kzbin.info?sub_c...
There are many elements that remained the same between the 1991 and the most recent 2017 version of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast. Some loved new fresh version. Here’s our list of the top 10 Differences Between 1991 and 2017 Beauty and the Beast! The top differences we noticed are The Beast’s magical book, LeFou’s character changes, the curse is different, we learn more about Belle’s mother, and we learn more about the beast.
MsMojo's Social Media:
Facebook►► / mswatchmojo
Twitter►► / mswatchmojo
Instagram►► / mswatchmojo
Snapchat ►► / mswatchmojo
Get MsMojo Merchandise at www.watchmojo.com/store
Shop: shop.watchmojo.com/collection...
WatchMojo is a leading producer of reference online video content of Top 10 Lists, Origins, Biographies, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.

[@EditorOfSL]

I actually liked Le Fou’s character change; somehow he became more human in the remake and it was kind of a better ending for him to be pardoned and hopefully find romance than to just be chased out of the castle and never be seen again.

[@mickbeth2011]

Another small (and annoying, in my opinion) change in the live action version is when Mrs. Potts answers Cogsworth question for the Beast when he asks why the Beast let Belle go. I think it's so much more romantic in the animated movie when the Beast says he let Belle go because he loves her.

[@JStryker47]

Also in the original, when Belle sees her father collapse in the snow, Beast has a moment's hesitation to think about the risks before he tells her to go to save him; whereas in the new one, he just tells her right away. The original approach to that made for better character development.

[@gerdtt79]

JStryker47 I actually think the way he immediately lets her go in the remake is even more romantic, I mean think about it he knows he's giving up his close and probably only chance to end the misery he's lived through the last number of years yet he cares so much for Belle that it doesn't even take 10 seconds for him to know what the right thing to do for her sake is, as though he had already thought about what he should do if her father needed her to go back to him, if that's not love I don't know what is.

[@spongebobdisneymariofan3715]

Another thing that the 2017 remake is different from the 1991 film is that we realize that the prince was raised by his cruel father after his mother died. That also shows us why the prince was arrogant and selfish in the first place.

[@rosewilliams5235]

Sponge Bob true it’s sad

[@samalberino669]

Sponge Bob true, it’s devastating and should not have let his father get to him the way he did

[@dianaraisa9420]

While the animated Beast wants to make THE MAXIMAL IMPRESSION to Maurice, the live-action Beast is barely seen and doesn't say a word. The animated Beast considers Belle to be brave and selfless, while the live-action Beast considers her as simply a liar. He says ''She's the daughter of a common thief'', as if he'd been waiting for the white-carriage princess (and it's quite strange, why did he leave her in his castle, if he didn't want to get any deal elationship with her). In the library scene, the live-action Beast behaves as if Belle's company is unpleasant to him, and even she has much more fun without him, yes it's. The animated Beast eats in the ''doggy'' manner by habit, and Belle is being confused by that. The live-action Beast eats from the bowl voluntarily, for paying a little bit of attention to Belle, because she can't take her eyes off the book. The snowball game in the live-action movie doesn't really look like a game, because the Beast knocks Belle down as if he wanted to get rid of her, because a falling with your head back on a stone floor is quite dangerous.

[@spongebobdisneymariofan3715]

I feel like the prince's father was the one responsible for the prince to get cursed. If the prince's father wasn't heartless and cruel, the prince wouldn't have rejected the old woman (aka. the Enchantress) and turned into a beast. I feel that the prince's father should've been the one to get cursed, but he probably died before the prince was cursed along with his servants.

[@dianaraisa9420]

Oscar Wilde's Star Child also rejected the wretched beggar woman, though she tried to explain him that she's his mother, - and it was all without the heartless father.

[@kiaburt5091]

DUDE! What about how in the 1991 original, Maurice was just as blind-sided and awe-struck by Gaston’s machoism whereas in the 2017 remake, he was not about to let an arrogant egotistical blowfish have his daughter’s hand in marriage?! That was honestly my favorite change in this remake. And what about how in the 1991 rendition, they keep Lefou as Gaston’s minion, and in the remake, he makes the bold move of turning against the mob partway through the fight? Another great change!

[@dnyV23]

I was very disappointed with the library in the village. It was more like a book shelf than a library.

[@starsmoonlight8840]

+Blue_2469 It wasn't even a library; it was more a church with books in it.

[@captainmarvelwilson508]

Yeah. Me too.

[@stephaniefox896]

That was what library for the time period at that time books where hard to come by only for wealthy and nobles most villagers could not read or write.

[@camilsanders2010]

right.. he didn't even make it a surprise like they did in the original version. they didn't make it as much as a love story as the original.

[@ieatchunksofdogshitbut8517]

The village was illiterate and makes up a whole musical number to gossip about someone reading a book

[@AdamYJ]

The biggest thing, in my mind is that they returned the theft of the rose to the story. You see, one of the most iconic parts of the original fairy tale was that Belle's father took a rose from the Beast's garden that Belle asked for. This pretty much kicks off the entire conflict of the story. In the fairy tale, it was to show that Belle had simpler, less lavish desires than her two greedy sisters. The animated film, with the two sisters being gone and simplicity not being one of the virtues they were trying to promote, that scene was changed. The remake reintroduced it by reimagining the rose as a symbolic link to Belle's mother.

[@itsmarslaynes2531]

Wasn't that a brother's Grimm fairytale? The lady and the lion?

[@stephvandykeozzy]

I don't think it was the Grimm brothers. It was someone else. The name escapes me.

[@starsmoonlight8840]

+ItsMarSlaynes +Steph V.D. All I remember is Jacqueline Ogburn. But I don't think that is it, since she is either alive or recently passed. Edit: No, I found the story. It's Brother's Grimm. Jacqueline Ogburn was ust someone who found and published it recently. (I posted this edit on another one of my comments and I fell of my chair laughing.

[@PricefieldPunk]

I felt like the 1991 did a better job of detailing Belle and the Beast falling in love.

[@LucienSabre]

C&M Punk I would say the opposite, the live action version has more scenes showing the building up of their romance.

[@ohTHATalana]

That's because Emma Watson can't act

[@amandakavanagh3406]

C&M Punk did not. In the live action, Emma portrays the character perfectly, and I can see the expression and emotion on her face change, subtlety but surely. Belle in the 1991 version is too girly, and not strong enough. This is only my opinion though

[@oncer_9721]

That has nothing to do with Emma Watson If the writers dont make the script better, Emma Watson can't make more out of it! After all, she has to do whats written in the script. So if there's not more written about how she should look, act, etc, she has to stick with that. You obviously haven't seen a movie script before

[@ohTHATalana]

Oncer_97 okay that script could have been golden but if the person acting sucks it doesn't matter

[@maibates2796]

I like how the 2017 movie gave us another reason for belle and the beasts love, because a lot of people say he gave her a library, then she loved him, I didn’t think that but I loved the more detail in 2017

[@khalidhenry3857]

Evermore is my favorite song in the remake

[@RH-pw8hp]

Khalid Henry i completely agree with you

[@LucienSabre]

Khalid Henry Me too, it’s heart-breakingly intense....and I heard they weren’t sure if to put in the movie, thank God they changed their mind! :)

[@RH-pw8hp]

LucienSabre good thing they did

[@ladyvenusdragon]

I have mixed feelings about the song though. I'm not trying to make any negative comments on it, but just hear me out. To me honestly, the song felt a bit out of place or forced yet I still liked it. In the original movie, you hear an anguishing roar from the beast as Belle rode away to save her father and you felt his pain. In this song, however, we do hear him basically explaining how he feels hurt by her leaving but knows that he truly has felt real love. I don't hat the song at all, yet I found it kind of out of nowhere and threw me off a bit. Also, Dan Stevens really has an amazing and powerful voice both speaking and singing so great job good sir.

[@LucienSabre]

ladyvenusdragon Really? To me it felt like it fitted perfectly and it was very well introduced, with the scenes leading to it fluidly flowing into the musical part. :) I agree on Dan Stevens’ performance: I didn’t like when they casted him but once I saw the movie and heard him, I completely changed my mind; he is awesome, and his rendition of Evermorer is way better than Josh Groban’s in the end credits. 😍

[@bumble_vee981]

I understand why everyone is saying that the animated is better than the 2017 Beauty and the Beast, but you can't deny that some of the attention to the details was fantastic, like, for example, Chip had a missing tooth when he was a child.

[@brittanypolifka7100]

bumble_vee I totally agree! I do remember the human chip at the end of the cartoon was missing a tooth (might have just been chipped)...but your point is still valid.

[@SeizeTheDay95]

I actually loved that Belle was an inventor in the new one as it gave her intelligence an outlet as opposed to just sitting around and dreaming.

[@graceberry8170]

I. Like the. 1991. One better

[@davidray3133]

Ballerina GB too many periods in the wrong places.

[@graceberry8170]

Dave All ik when I type I sometimes accidentally press the period and am too lazy to go back and fix it.😂 Sorry if that bothered you.

[@gerdtt79]

it's illegal to like the 2017 version so it might as well be better.

[@zoelindwall637]

Ballerina GB both beauty and the beast movies are good

[@jeffreyquinde6707]

Zoe Lindwall the animated film is light years ahead of the remake

[@celticpoet21]

another different thing is that Belle borrowed books from the church library instead of a bookstore as since she is the only one who actually reads, it would be impossible to keep such a business open.

[@annafowdy]

Diana North if she's the only one who reads, what did they teach the boys in school?

[@celticpoet21]

maybe the Bible, the alphabet, history and other mandatory volumes. sorry, I meant the only one who loves to read in her spare time. theres a difference between reading as a personal interest and required educational material. the priest even calls her "the town's only bookworm"

[@dionysos46]

There's a child book where child Belle made strong efforts to reopen the library. And peoples overreact about illiteracy of townspeoples. They're just overbusy with manual tasks to really talk about literature.

[@annafowdy]

Oh, okay

[@TCWRebelsResistanceWords]

4:54 That is, so far, the ONLY time I actually broke down sobbing out loud in theaters. Usually I’m able to control myself in public crowds and keep my sobbing contained to just a soft cry until I’m alone and then I can “let it all out,” but Dan Stevens’s performance was just so heartfelt and flawless that it instantly pulled at my heartstrings & it broke me in an instant! But thankfully some kids in close proximity to me were getting noisy so no one was really paying all that much attention to me

[@Jollysweets08]

Yeah Gaston is definitely more savage in this version, he shoots the beast...3 times! goes after widows, single women, hits old men, leaves friends wounded and hates vegetables

[@chadpeterson5698]

Gaston is legitimately EVIL in the remake.

[@Jollysweets08]

Chad Peterson right?!

[@Maria-mu4ol]

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this comment! Thank you for making my day! 😁

[@adcastle4876]

1 big difference from the 1991 version to the 2017 is that the Original Belle could actually sing. I'm a fan of Emma but let's face it. Just sayin. ❤

[@gerdtt79]

Emma Watson's singing feels way more human though, original Belle sounds too much like an angel for a modest village girl.

[@immeschootu]

Please stop hating on Emma, she is a good singer but Disney decided to autotune

[@lazulidrawzalot0616]

Emma can sing, just not as good as they wanted her to. Honestly, they could’ve just used the money for autotune for voice lessons and it would’ve been okay.

[@E3g4]

IamWolfo ! Yep she’s not a singer so what can you expect she wasn’t amazing but she wasn’t bad at all

[@mossomness]

I also like that in the new version, they made Beast intelligent. His love of books was a huge reason for why they bonded and fell in love.

[@brittanypolifka7100]

mossomness agreed. They touch on that more in the stage musical as well.

[@captainmarvelwilson508]

In my opinion. I don't really care if the Beast is intelligent. He was more relatable and subtle in the original. Also his animalistic traits make sense since he spent 10 years concealed inside the castle following the Enchantress' spell.

[@E3g4]

Brittany Polifka yes and when they show her her room a song called home is playing in the background that’s from the musical

[@hillyplays29]

I love this version. My grandma took me to see the original and also watched the remake which she also loved.

[@CelebrianUndomiel]

They also changed "ten years we've been rusting" to "too long we've been rusting", which sorts out the age issue. Also it's a small thing, but I like how they gender neutralised the beginning to "if he could earn THEIR love in return" as opposed to "her". It opens up the possibility firstly of him loving someone of any gender, but also I think to the possibility of any kind of love, not necessarily romantic. If he'd just made an awesome friend who ended up loving him, I feel like that would have broken the curse too.

[@AfoParedes]

Kassie Stepanova actually the "their love" part was also in the animated version (in the special edition, when they added Human Again.

[@brittanypolifka7100]

Kassie Stepanova ooh I like that! Great observation!!!

[@keandregreen5628]

No just no about the gender neutralizing crap

[@ChaoticMushy]

@@keandregreen5628 stfu

[@anteater9408]

@@ChaoticMushy It's a DISNEY film. Calm your nerves down!

[@nhope1922]

Wasn't Maestro the antagonist in the Christmas spin off? He was a different instrument (it's been more than a decade since I've seen the movie) but I thought he was already introduced.

[@hopeschannel]

He was an organ

[@sweetbitter2]

nmdibble Fortes was his name

[@nhope1922]

I apologize, but Clara is right. His name was Forte and he was voiced by Tim Curry so he was a different character and it was a mix up. And yes he was an Organ lol.

[@brittanypolifka7100]

nmdibble I also though the day in the sun song was from that, too.

[@chadpeterson5698]

That was Forte who was playing by the LEGENDARY Tim Curry..

[@Disney65Fan]

Dan Stevens was frigging hot as the prince. As what Stevens says about the prince he was a spoilt brat.

[@HenshinHeroesMedia]

I give credit to the writers to include the white rose picking since the pre-disney story had the beast want to kill Maurice for picking the rose. Also I like how Gaston is not that dumb since he looks for ways to get belle, even siding with Maurice when he cries that the beast kidnapped hee

[@HenshinHeroesMedia]

*her

[@ChaoticMushy]

I grew up with the 1991 movie but I just love the 2017 movie way more. It feels more full in the story and the songs are amazing. The live action music feels more full. It's also so emotional that no matter how many times I watch it, I still cry.

[@vincentfichtler7758]

and there's a another difference with leFou in the animated movie he's truly a antagonist while the live movie he's a reformed antagonist in the end of the movie.

[@catlover5998]

There both amazing movies I like curse in the new one better though at least people can stop nag at fact he was 11

[@marshmallowfluff769]

I thought it was a very nice detail to put in the magic book, since it was in the original fairytale, too. It was a cruel part of the spell: Even though the Beast would be able to see all those places he could never physically go there, since his "hideous" appearance wouldn't allow it (I think the Beast was really handsome).

[@starsmoonlight8840]

I seem to be the only one who likes Emma's voice.

[@sunnygirl523]

TheCuteDiamondWolf no I love Emma Watson's singing voice and she is not autotuned 😁

[@pastelbonnibel]

@@sunnygirl523 She is tho

[@wiiguud7871]

I love it tho but why they should put the autotune

[@Ori_Shaked]

#11-more peoplein town wear blue' while in the animated movie belle is the only one to show her diferrence from the rest of the town

[@alphawolf2638]

Personaly I like the remake more. Kinda because of LeFou's character change, the enchantres's change, the song changes (espessially Evermore and mob song) , Gaston's more evil, how we learn about Belle's mother, the opening scene and more But if you prefer the original then that's ok

[@TCWRebelsResistanceWords]

I love ALL of the differences in these videos. The original video is as old as me and it’s been one of my all time favorites for as far back as I can remember (which is when I was 5), the newer film was so much more beautiful and magical and made me cry even more. I also love how the soundtrack music is the same, the songs are “extended,” and there are new songs

[@AngelusaNobilis]

I don't ever intend to watch live action remakes, I guess I don't like change lol. They can't come up with a new Disney renaissance so they decide to remake the ones from that era. I would only change my mind if they made a darker and more gothic remake of Hunchback. Then I might watch it.

[@musicaltheatergeek79]

Hear, hear! There is no point in remaking movies that are already good, even perfect, to begin with, so this is just an easy cash-grab for them. What they should be doing is remaking bad/mediocre films and *improving* on them. THE BLACK CAULDRON has so much potential as a live-action remake, but Disney won't dare touch it, because it flopped big time and is not a recognizable entity. In short, Disney today is too successful/established and thus complacent. The company has only ever been creative/adventurous in the years when it was struggling, because they had nothing to lose. But these trying times produced such classics as SNOW WHITE, CINDERELLA, and THE LITTLE MERMAID even kicked off the Disney Renaissance!

[@chadpeterson5698]

@@musicaltheatergeek79 Disney makes the remakes so they can keep the property

[@666Brago]

There are some things that the live-action film did better, but in my taste the animated movie is far superior.

[@BrixieAnn]

The autotune on Emma never really bugged me. Belle's singing in the original was way better, but in the 2017, it was passable for me at least.

[@Flutterbutt225]

It was just insulting as hell when Belle got the leading vocals in a song (I think it was "Days in the Sun") and the wardrobe, an operatic singer, had to do backup vocals for a heavily-autotuned singer.

[@BrixieAnn]

If I recall, Belle had like one verse in that song and I could barely hear her during the chorus. Might just be me.

[@GiulyHermi96]

Flutterbutt225 Belle only has a stanza in that song. Madame the Garderobe has like 3 of them, so Emma Watson didn’t have the leading role in that song at all

[@10GGundam]

i agreed. people are just so use to auto tone and electric styles of singing nowadays that they can't recognize a genuine and pure voice. i loved her voice and would kill to have it.

[@E3g4]

GILLIAN ROGERS to be honest I didn’t really notice it at all exept from the first song but apart from that

[@jerrysonett1937]

They’re both really good, but the live action one has a more mature story and more detail.

[@dionysos46]

The original was more mature because we can feel how Beast is close to be definitely an animal. Amadeus & Dangerous Liaisons are more mature, and the first I quoted is even more magical than the live-action BatB.

[@gerdtt79]

disnysos46 The new 1 definatly has more mature dialogue though.

[@dionysos46]

Ocfan207 It don't fit with the musical fantasy of the animated, it's like a fastidious remake of the Cocteau movie with forced musical interventions. And it's too much a new England vision of France to be really credible.

[@gerdtt79]

disnysos46 I'm not sure I know what you mean.

[@jerrysonett1937]

dionysos46 “New England”, what?

[@GoldGleeGamer1]

I don't care what anyone else says; I still believe the 2017 version to be the PERFECT relaunch. In fact, some of the new stuff added into the 2017 version I actually liked.

[@User-rt6wp]

Thank you very much. I was afraid I was the only one.

[@samalberino669]

My favorite new song from the live action version is ‘How Does A Moment Last Forever’ by Celine Dion, however, the song I favor the most is ‘Beauty And The Beast’ (ballroom dance song) from the original and the live action version

[@TCWRebelsResistanceWords]

One of my favorite differences that wasn’t mentioned was the reason why the Beast imprisoned Maurice. In the original film, the Beast imprisoned him just because he was “trespassing.” In the newer film, he imprisoned him because he stole a rose. He saw Maurice as merely an elderly man who got lost in the woods and figured would move on if he had some food and a chance to warm himself up, which was true, but didn’t count on the old man stealing a rose. This was exactly what happened in the original fairy tale that was written in 1740 in France. I know this because growing up, I had a storybook that was pretty much the shortened version of the original fairy tale (this was my all time favorite story growing up, and it still is) and it was real different than the Disney version. Then again, the Disney films are always different than the original legends/fairy tales

[@hopeschannel]

I personally didn't think Emma Watson was the best choice to play belle. I feel like there are plenty of unknown actresses that would've looked more like the original belle and would be able to sing way better but Disney just wanted to choose the first a list celeb that auditioned. Oh and the added songs didn't fit the movie at all imo

[@natashawells6951]

hopelovestyler true

[@reneehaa9684]

Agree wish they would of went with a unknown or not as well know actress maybe even that actress from glee that played Rachel.

[@supermarioplushybros3627]

It just feels weird because all I think is Hermione

[@Daphineholland]

You hold on to those words especially when Aladdin live action shit storm comes out

[@muymuy777]

Someone French and who could actually sing would have been perfect.

[@jeanclaudejunior]

I love both the 1991 and the 2017 versions in the same way. Matthew Hedrich loves these two as well

[@rebeccajoyner3858]

I loved the 2017 version! There was a clear more storyline in this version than in 1991. And it makes belle an inventor which I LOVE!!! Both are amazing!

[@captainmarvelwilson508]

I completely disagree. I really don't think that her being an inventor was such a good idea. It made her too much of a feminist.

[@MrsRavenclaw]

When the young prince was singing when his mother had passed I cried because I am a mother of a son myself. Furthermore, he and I have a very strong bond. I couldn't help, but think of my son and I in that scene. Just typing this comment I have tears rolling down my face.

[@Maria-mu4ol]

Yeah that scene was very touching!

[@jchandlersabeast]

#1 Emma Watson does not command the screen like the cartoon Belle did

[@Lizziefan]

I love the differences between the 1991 version and the 2017 version!! It's well done!!

[@poet18318]

They changed the horse, Phillip, he was a bigger Clydesdale and was a pivotal roll in the animated version. I didn’t like this version. Gugu mbatha should’ve played bell and they should’ve kept the final scene of the roof of the castle. This version broke my heart! So many opportunities wasted!

[@soscarlettitwasss]

I actually loved a lot of additions and details in 2017 one more than the 1991 one. Of course the original will always be the original, but the 2017 one was a REALLY good live action remake. It had the magical feeling, I LOVED "Evermore", "How does a moment last forever", " Days in the sun", "Paris of my childhood" and of course the 2017 version of the ballroom scene+Beauty and the Beast song. The ending actually made me cry (and of course emotional too, if not cry) which the 1991 version failed to. Just accept the fact that both are great and move on. Don't stay stuck on this one when live action remakes like Mulan exist

[@NAVEMAN3]

Though I love the 1991 version I have to give respect for the remake as it fixes mistakes that the original did.

[@lazulidrawzalot0616]

THANK YOU! I love them both and everyone’s like “it’s illegal to like the new one” and blah blah blah but they’re both beautiful in their own way!

[@User-rt6wp]

@@lazulidrawzalot0616 Totally agree with you!

[@jenkarat9141]

I love the ballroom dancing scene in d animated one

[@annafowdy]

It showed how beautifully they used computers in 2D animation.

[@briannacam.]

Once more difference is that the public people who live in the town have more character, they also have more meaning. Considering that in a part of the beginning you see that Belle is the only girl who can read in that town.

[@oliviacole9797]

This is one of my favorite channels on KZbin and this is one of my favorite films. Thank you for making this video! Also, thanks for giving spoiler alerts!

[@nixfarrik6214]

I think they took the animation to cinematic viewing brilliantly. The fact they added songs with the original composers made original viewers like myself instantly accepting of them because they didn’t detract from the animation and only added to the film. In terms of Emma’s singing, Paris Of My Childhood is sung live on set, if you compare the cd recording then the version in the movie, they sound entirely different. No, she is no Sam Barks but I think you have to imagine it instead as...what if people did just walk around singing spontaneously? Not everyone is going to be perfect.

[@olvialee7221]

Differences, changes. All I know is I love Beauty and the Beast and it’s my number one favorite movie of all time

[@olvialee7221]

I didn’t expect this but I love it that they gave the Beast a song

[@willow7878]

I actually didn’t like the new one and the biggest change for me to get used to was the fact that Emma Watson has an English accent while playing a French girl, it was upsetting to say the least. Also another thing that was disappointing was the auto tune, if Emma Watson cannot sing, then I’m sure there was other people who would’ve played the character better and could sing a lot better.

[@laurenstich1049]

Like the 2017 version much, much, much more than the original, which was fantastic. Emma Watson is perfection and Dan Stevens as the Beast is incredibly appealing, and his voice (you can listen to his real voice without all the machinations on KZbin) had a very palpable tenderness. While not a singer, per se, Dan Stevens has that distinctive voice like melting butter, and the acting chops to make this so believable. I'm hooked. And the great cast......

[@lucypatrick7631]

In a relationship with the wardrobe 😂😂

[@IlluminatedLIfe]

Great vid! Thanks for sharing.

[@sunnygirl523]

I love that Gaston is more darker in the live action beauty and the beast 😊😊😊

[@stellakrgn]

Really nice video!! I will definetely watch the 2017 version!!

[@williamradford9631]

The book sequence, think of a place you all ways wanted see, and find it in your minds eye. Emma giving Belle's character a few tweaks.

[@sophiehanssel2017]

I really liked that LeFou's character changed. Bravo, Josh Gad!

[@mlpartclub412]

Can you do, “Top 10 differences between the animated Lion King and the LA Lion King, please?

[@bingewatcher9040]

The 2017 version answers some plot holes

[@parmiss.6738]

The reason Belle was the inventor in the new film is because Emma Watson stated herself in a buzzfeed interview that they weren't gonna use the inventor idea for Maurice and so Emma suggested if they could use it on Belle and so they did so.

[@ladyasriel7874]

The original is brilliant, the remake was painful to watch. Especially hated Emma Watson’s auto tuned singing.

[@gerdtt79]

Valyrian Vlinder well done you're obeying the law by disliking the 2017 version, no Fines for you.

[@starsmoonlight8840]

+Valyrian Vlinder I myself like the 2017 version more, because it is deeper into story then the 1991. Also, Emma Watson's voice wasn't that auto-tuned. When she "went" to paris to see her old home, that singing wasn't auto-tuned, no matter how much you hate it

[@TIGER-xk4gk]

Oh what the hell are you talking about? autotuned, what nonsense

[@staggmovie]

I actually liked her singing better then you did, but you have to remember that Emma Watson has not really been much of a singer prior to this movie. She of course best known for playing Herimone Granger in the Harry Potter movies, and has gone on to do other movies since the Harry Potter series ended. She actually had to take singing classes for this movie, which assuming you think she should have taken more. But if you really think her singing is bad, watch the movie version of Mamma Mia and pay attention to the song SOS when Pierce Brosnan sings his part on the songs, and tell me what you think?

[@User-rt6wp]

There wasn't auto tune!

[@TheShadowLight13]

One thing a lot of people forget is that in some of the earlier versions of the tale the (beast) prince was only age 10 when cursed and was told he had until his 18th birthday to find a maiden to not just fall in love with but marry.

[@Jamie_Jewel]

I'll admit when Gaston straight up shot the beast I almost shouted "Oh that's just fighting dirty!" A knife is one thing but a GUN?

[@jensmith7896]

I LOVED Evermore!

[@beccagregory3586]

The scene that made me cry is when Plumette "died" in Lumiere's arms

[@bluegypsydoll]

the Damn Dress Is Lop Sided and SHE DIDNT FLIP THROUGH THE BOOK while she was singing. AND i Hated the way they took away the allure and lighting in the castle when beast and belle met he didnt even Step into the light right. whatever they Did to this movie it was a Disappointment. shame.

[@fzcbh4698]

The magical book was in the real novel I remember or there was something similar like magical horse or gloves I guess🤔 And I think the idea of Enchantress taking care of Belle's father is references to real story when she met Belle at the end and tell her that she is her niece(so the enchantress is Belle's aunt).

[@123j109]

its become one of my favorite movies and i loved it so much. I love any version of Beauty and the Beast i love the story overall

[@samuelrodriguez9801]

Gaston was just delusional in the first movie but in the live action he was way more sinister.

[@olvialee7221]

The number one change I love is the couple Lumiere and Plumette. In the animated movie, they weren’t together that much until the it was made in 2017 and finally kiss on screen

[@MERCHIODOS]

Am I the only one who hated the Beauty and the Beast live action remake? They added new songs which was not needed and they felt like they didn't fit well into the movie, they ruined old songs by adding extra bits to it and they also ruined the film by adding extra scenes. Yes there was some scenes that I liked, like how snow falling when reaching the castle and the town folks forgoting the castle and who lived / worked there, but to me this movie this film is one of the worst Disney remakes right next to Cinderella live action remake

[@gerdtt79]

No you are not the only 1 that hated what a joke.

[@brettkimura]

I still love this movie.

[@queencaitlinsparkle2001]

Well, Candenza is actually a live action character of Forte from Beauty and the Beast 2: Enchanted Christmas

[@matthewhedrichjr.5445]

Uh they’re different characters

[@ysabellawuthrich223]

1. The animated version is better

[@gerdtt79]

Well liking the 2017 version is against the law.

[@glo-pv1jn]

I agree with you.

[@Daphineholland]

I like them both so

[@farheenhasan8569]

NO!!!

[@User-rt6wp]

NO, it's not!

[@ngandang5644]

In Beauty and the Beast 2, they did that opening scene (how the prince turned into a beast). It’s different because he was only 11 years old in that scene in animated version

[@ghostdragon4164]

Difference between the 1991 and 2017 version. 1991 had mostly Americans while 2017 had mostly British

[@MischiefHowlVA]

who knew that 26+ years later I went from seeing myself as Belle to seeing myself as LeFou. well.

[@olvialee7221]

“10 years we’ve been rusting” went over my head when I was a kid. I know he was cursed as an adult but why would Lumiere say that in the song having the beast be a kid? Sounds kinda messed up but I’m happy 2017 fixed it

[@Markimark151]

I prefer the 1991 version, because it had better story flow and supporting actors. I do like the remake for the two leads, but I hate how it recycled the songs and the uncanny valley of animated characters. Mrs. Potts, Lumiere, and Cogsworth, were way better in the original and sing better!

[@gerdtt79]

I actually grew more fond of the servants watching the remake than I did watching the original.

[@Markimark151]

Ocfan207 while they’re good actors, I’m just put off by the little movement and attention to detail compared to the original.

[@matthewhedrichjr.5445]

But I absolutely loathed the costume Lumiere wore in the original and e auburn wig on Cogsworth.

[@Markimark151]

@@matthewhedrichjr.5445 you’re comparing animation in the original to costumes worn by actors in the remake! That has nothing to do with the story.

[@jaydenmidgley9687]

I thought Chip didn't go would be one because in the new film Chip doesn't go with Belle to save her Dad but In the old one he does so

[@elizahamilton8461]

I know im late but omg I loved the remake do much it was more historically accurate and it was just so amazing

[@maxvalladolid8564]

Fun Fact: when Belle sings How Does a Moment Last Forever, in her old home in Paris, the scene we see is live. Emma Watson sang that scene live and they kept it in.

[@vjapple3083]

I haven’t seen the new movie but that first one looked hella cute! The first time I’ve ever seen it and I ship it so much!!!

[@annafowdy]

Why is that when someone is raised by one parent/guardian, we have find out what happened to the other(s)?

[@gerdtt79]

why shouldn't we?

[@starsmoonlight8840]

+Anna Fowdy For most people Family is important. If you are around people with 2 parents EVERY DAY, of course you would want to find out about your missing one.

[@leslietonn3181]

Dare I say the remake is better than the original❣️

[@mahmmodemran1744]

At this moment the beast miraculously changed into a handsome prince and told beauty that he was under a curse

[@sangwo_o]

right now i'm actually obsessed with the new beauty and the beast soundtrack.its becoming a problem, evermore is definitely my favourite!

[@tiedyedowl8367]

I haven’t seen the new movie because I assumed it was like the older version-now I can’t wait to see it. May borrow or rent a copy today! 😃

[@SickkAddiction]

1991 > 2017 The only difference 1991 is better than 2017 in every way, the singing, the songs, the animation, the actors... And the rose made sense without having to see the enchantress in the movie (like in the 1991 one). They should've done the actual stained glass, that woulda been beautiful and worth it. I feel like there was no need to extend the story, if people really wanted to connect with the beast so badly that is a Disney story that has been adapted, if no one knew.

[@Buffy8Fan]

Would we have assumed a gay Lafou had it not been announced ahead of time? Probably not. Also, what was the point of having a time limit on the spell if The Enchantress could just take it back when "I love you," wasn't said in time?

[@EditorOfSL]

Buffy8Fan I never got that either.

[@starsmoonlight8840]

+Buffy8Fan Probably for them to have a chance. It is like a punishment; too cruel to anyone who comes; no friends for you, beast!

[@gerdtt79]

Buffy8Fan well it's quite possible that that was the plan all along, once the last petal fell the Enchantress would have the power to undo the spell but only if he did in fact change and fall in love and gain a Girl's love in return. It's never said that they actually had to say they loved each other just that they had to gain it.

[@starsmoonlight8840]

+Ocfan207 I believe it was when Belle left the castle and was coming back to save "Beast" when she realized she loved him. I guess the Enchantress just saw it more than.

[@gerdtt79]

TheCuteDiamondWolf I like my theory.

[@gloriagavagnin2115]

Beauty in the Beast has always been my favorite movie and tale so, Of course I love the original, but when the live action came out, I was so excited. even more when I saw the cast and the singers like Beyonce Celine etc. Seeing changes like new songs, the different curse, the new scenes like the book's, the enchantress's and lefou's different character, the most accurate story of the beast childhood and the fact we know more about belle's mother. this makes this movie even more mature and it's definitely accurate for the year it came out. it's definitely more realistic and I love this.

[@LisaMariavanHarmelen]

Number 1: The cast of the 1991 version can actually sing (At least, ALL the cast members)

[@lillyyarney67]

The original was so much better in my opinion. Emma Watson wasn't very good with singing which Belle does quite a bit of in the movie. In all honesty none of the live action remakes so far have been able to surpass the original. Cinderella was meh, the Jungle Book was also just alright the only cool aspect of that was the telling of the red flower, and I feel the same is going to be done to the Lion King, Mulan, and Aladdin. I wish Disney would stop remaking the classics and start making new movies like Moana with new stories ,new princesses,and heroines. I'd personally love to see an African Disney princess. Also to those people talking about movies like this filling plot holes, all Disney movies have plot holes are we going to redo them all with mediocrity just to fill a plot point that no one cared about when they were young? I think that is a dumb reason to make a movie personally. I fell in love with these movies as a kid not because of the minor details, but because they were vivid, lesson learning, fun, had the best loveable songs and characters. If you can't make those things and recreate that magic then what truly is the point?

[@MERCHIODOS]

Disney already did an African princess with Tiana in Princess and the Frog.

[@lillyyarney67]

Merchiodos Tiana was African American I am speaking about a black princess from the continent of Africa so my point and opinion on it still stand.

[@gerdtt79]

Lily yarney start? chick Disney has always been making original movies.

[@lillyyarney67]

Ocfan207 They aren't original with remaking the classics js.

[@cultclassicdeadinside9862]

This video gave me chills

[@systemshocker2875]

0:04 bruh

[@sofiarosanes9511]

yeah also its outfits are accurate on what they are wearing in their time i mostly perfer the original outfit

[@matthewhedrichjr.5445]

For Lumiere human form 2017 costume but for hairstyle 1991, the villagers costume and character in 2017 are better and get to know why they hadn’t gone to the castle. Cogsworth human: hairstyle and outfit 2017

[@michellekavanagh2053]

Nicely done, fellow Canadian