Top 10 FASTEST Strategic Bombers in History

[@doctorken513]

The #1 aircraft should be the FB-111A used by the USAF Strategic Air Command with a USAF reported top speed of 1,673 MPH or 2,692 KPH (Mach 2.2). Just sayin'.

[@jerrybeninate6017]

They had them at pease in nh pilots would do after burner take offs for ROTC cadets that would light the sky Got to do a simulator flight

[@mekarpanjaitan-u7n]

xb 70 valkyrie is number one the only bomber that can reach mach 3

[@smelkus]

@@mekarpanjaitan-u7n but that never entered service they said they were only doing aircraft that entered service

[@kostaskritsilas2681]

Sat in the Navigator/Weapons officer seat of an FB-111 at Plattsburgh AFB in the mid-1970s.

[@brihath0805]

I was a Maintenance Officer at Pease on the FB-111'S. Not only were they fast, but they could bomb like nobody's business. Shacks were a regular thing during ORI bomb scoring. They were regular winners of bombing competitions.

[@randstahl4869]

Appreciate the concise information written with precision as well enjoy seeing an accompaniment of captivating flight visuals.

[@ad.c.3548]

Yes FB-111, beautiful plane but what about the Valkyrie XB-70. Mach 3.0 and heavy payload and range

[@henrikerdland578]

It never went into service, that’s why its not included

[@tgsgardenmaintenance4627]

F-111?

[@piney6438]

where is the f-111

[@GregPalmer1000]

B58 no longer operational...where is a mention of the Avro Vulcan no longer operational also

[@smelkus]

@@GregPalmer1000 and Victor and valiant it would be good if they listed every bomber since world war 2 in order of speed including cancelled ones like the xb70 Valkyrie and B1A

[@spikespa5208]

The title said "in history" . Just because an aircraft is no longer in service doesn't mean it's not a part of "history". The ridiculous part is including 2 planes that *_aren't even in service yet._* Questionable list.

[@Azrael1st]

The B2 spirit looks like A cardboard cut out.

[@frankmcgowan3371]

Why would you put planes on that aren’t flying today?

[@smelkus]

@@frankmcgowan3371 probably because it's a top ten list and there are only 7 bombers currently in service around the world the B52, B1B, B2 spirit, TU95, TU22m, TU160 and Xian F6 and the B21 entering service soon

[@vittorrioverddi3867]

What about the Vulcan? Did you miss it?

[@Azrael1st]

Tu160 is the best!

[@williamprice3929]

Where's the Tungeon bomber from Buckaroo Banzai?

[@williamprice3929]

What is this "soon to be developed," if it hasn't been developed, then it has no history. Gee, when did the copy of the TU-16, the H-6, gain 2 extra engines?

[@ginjaico_6132]

Where is the Handley Page Heyford?!

[@frankbartels2359]

XB - 70 ???

[@misterramon7447]

No F-111, no FB-11, no A-5 BUT you include the Mirage IV? Rather hap-dash pick and choosing. Clickbait and nothing else. Unsubscribed

[@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf]

BUZZ

[@johnforsyth7987]

You might want to include that the entire B-52 fleet is scheduled to be re-engined with more modern engines in the very near future.

[@smelkus]

If you are going to mention the B58 and mirage IV which are retired why miss out the TU22 blinder another supersonic bomber from the same era

[@staniclaw.s]

Я фигею с комментаторов, которые выражают недовольство отсутствием F-111. Люди, вы вообще видели слово "strategic" в названии ролика?

[@Godmann5]

TU-95?

[@mrjason0290able]

How is this video made without the TU-95 Bear?

[@thom19671]

Why do you people watch just to critique?

[@TomMaunder-z8d]

F-15E?

[@JoshuaHistoryBuff]

No F-111? Your list is crap

[@robandcheryls]

Absolutely

[@robandcheryls]

“Strategic”

[@paulw7404]

@@robandcheryls They were when RAAF had them - We heard the sigh of relief from China in 2010 when they were retired.

[@michaelorourke3674]

Please choose a native speaker of English to read the commentary, thank you

[@henrikerdland578]

Hey, were are the F-111, Vulcan and Victor? They are all missing. F-111 is the fastest bomber that ever has entered service, and you missed it! You have made to many mistakes, I’m quitting the channel

[@richardbuckner4152]

Please get rid of the ai voice

[@jinibarman7691]

That's her real voice bro

[@b1lleman]

@@jinibarman7691 Well it sounds real to me also, I even like it if not for the sometimes scratching voice :-). If this is A.I., for me it's well done.

[@Matt.Willoughby]

Not an AI voice 🤣

[@TheTatabuda]

Слава Русији!

[@eddiev1548]

🤦🏻‍♂️ really🤷🏻‍♂️