Top 12 Longest Range Air-to-Air Missiles in the World

[@Sumitpande-fc4rs]

Astra mk3 was first reported range of 350km by a british London based think tank. Then drdo gave a number of 360km.. After some years & conducting multiple tests drdo revised the number to 340km for solid fuel ducted ramjet astra mk3 missile.. 10th missile could have been astra mk2 which has 160km range.. Although i take this numbers with pinch of salt because astra mk1 successfully hit a target like size of shahid kamikaze jet powered drone at whooping 89km range... Astra mk1 is stated to have 110km range. Missile have hit rate at very less range of there actual range..

[@Rahul_sharma...]

Astra mk3 300km range bhi hogi to bahot hai 😅

[@wankmaster69]

@@Rahul_sharma... 350km

[@Sumitpande-fc4rs]

​​@@Rahul_sharma... For you're knowledge aim120 had a 72kg motor which have it a range of 120km. Now just think it this way that was a rocket motor meteor gives range around 220km with 190kg weights Whereas astra mk3 which weights more 220kg has more fuel will give even longer range.. Just imagine a 72kg rocket which also has oxidizer gives this long range then a a air breathing missile which has increased 25-30kg fuel will give even better range. Than meteor. And astra mk3 uses atmospheric oxygen so it does not carry oxidiser only fuel almost alot more than meteor.. so u can have an idea of its range. Both have 178mm diameter. Astra is abit lengthy missile.. And Indian seeker electronics don't weight much different the aesa seeker showed in a exhibition displayed weight of some 13kg.. Fact is 178mm/180mm diameter missile have small electronics missiles like Russian r77 have 200 or 198mm diameter do not have much small electronics..

[@wajayenseporelmundo4588]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fJmTd6qhfZdsmJY

[@subasthapa4839]

Paper missile 😅

[@artiefakt4402]

As long as the aircraft's radar can't get a lock... those ranges won't really mean much

[@burlatsdemontaigne6147]

They don't need to be guided by the aircraft they are fired from. They can be directed by AWACS or from the ground or from a drone.

[@JC130676]

@@burlatsdemontaigne6147 But for terminal guidance the missile will need to use its own sensors, long range guiding isn't precise enough. The smaller radar dish in a missile will always have a much harder time locking onto a stealth aircraft.

[@tomgeorgsderholm4554]

It is all about the radar An old indian Mig 21 shot down a pakistani F 16

[@a5cent]

Nope.

[@lucaj8131]

Yes if we were still in the 80s...

[@УДачныйучасток-я1е]

The Russian-made R-37 missile has a range of 300 -400 km. The KS -172 missile manufactured in Russia has a range of -400 -500 km.

[@the_beef4762]

'According to Russia' take it with a grain of salt.

[@piotrd.4850]

@@the_beef4762 These are quite reasonable, as these are made to hit relatively slow moving targets like large transport, bomber or AEW&C aircraft. KS-172 is basically air launched Buk and are used only in 1-2 on largerst platforms ( e.g. MiG-31 ). There were tests that proved it ( at least for R-37 ) but this isn't as versatile and compact as R-77/AIM-120/Meteor/PL15.....

[@В.В.Путин-т6е]

😅How Americans howl here

[@Creamin_All_Offensive]

​@@piotrd.4850 the thing is that Russia and USSR are famous for spreading bullshit. There are a lot of examples of them saying they have much more and much better things they actually have. MiG-25, T-95, T-14 and Su-57 at least - one is flying coffin NATO responded with F-15 to, second never existed and was "created" in 90s (worst time in Russian history), third and fourth were created in crisis with no resources or electronics for them. Su-57 has no such engines and electronics to support such missiles.

[@GaionSputro]

Only Aim-120 is "real" missile in this video.

[@Terryray123]

The Aim-54 range is a little bit longer but not as much as a newer missile on the list

[@Savage_Viking]

Aim-174B is expected to exceed the range of all these missiles.

[@jeremyortiz2927]

They should name it "Son of Phoenix" Range: Yes 🌏

[@pashapasovski5860]

They made it,just didn't release it 😅

[@rickjames18]

I think you need to dig a little deeper into the AIM-260, the US wouldn't be developing a new BVR missile unless it was far more capable than the current US AIM120Ds and any adversaries. Most experts believe the AIM-260 will have a range of over 300km with faster top speed but also adjustable while on course. Basically, the new AIM-260 is only going to make sense because it will outperform anything any US enemy has at the moment or planned.

[@Emanuel-t5e]

Thing is, AIM-260 was planned to enter service many years ago, then "late 2023", now it is 2024 and it is still not there. Meanwhile the Meteor was introduced into European air forces in 2016. So yeah.. USA has been lacking behind for quite some time and still hasn't introcued the AIM-260.. Remember the issue with with the AIM-9? It was seen as underperforming really badly against the soviet equivalent, which was discovered in the 1990ies, with west Germany integrating the east German Air Force, and which caused the development of the IRIS-T. USA seems to have a history of lacking behind on air to air missiles.

[@Mach-6]

Good information, thanks

[@pkmkb007]

Meteor full range is also not disclosed by MBDA. It has longest no escape zone of any A2A missile of 60km.

[@Paws4thot]

True, and unlike the other claimed "ramjets" in this video, the Meteor actually has visible air scoops, oh yes and the ability to coast in mid flight then relight the engine for terminal guidance.

[@businessprodigy_]

@@Paws4thot The R-77 has not a ramjet but a dual stage booster, for terminal guidance too

[@peymanstd]

Doesn’t the MAR have direct correlation to the range?

[@cvdheyden]

Meteor is by far the best missile! We should by that one as well, it is a true game changer. This list is crap.

[@wajayenseporelmundo4588]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fJmTd6qhfZdsmJY

[@brikeswardebbarma4029]

I'm a indian 🇮🇳 I really enjoy watching your videos

[@paulbunn2255]

It's a false sense of security.

[@skinggaming8560]

​@@paulbunn2255Whatever makes u happy

[@erics8192]

b2 stratofortress?

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

It's not a missile and there exists nothing like B 2 startofortress as B 2 bomber is known by the name Spirit and not startofortress

[@erics8192]

@@soumyajitsingha9614that was my point, they called the B2 by the B52's moniker

[@JoshuaHistoryBuff]

Narrator always makes mistakes like this. Unprofessional really

[@ArunKumarAE-wd5he]

ಜೈ ಹಿಂದ್ 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о]

Bramos?

[@patriotasrbija]

I know that Wyper R-37 M carry MiG-31,and it has wight of 6 tons,range 400km with hipersonic speed.I know too,that R-77 M carry MiG 29 SM of Serbian air force,range about 200 km...

[@patriotasrbija]

@chuckfarley4130 This Russian rocket (as all of others),is the best in the World,no doubt...Right example is war in the Ukraina .Russian military technic destroy NATO equipment as toys...

[@GaionSputro]

Funfact: many of this are never exist.

[@বাংলা_সাহিত্য]

7:22 Astra mk 3 proud of India and nightmare of China

[@GaionSputro]

Pakistan better, atleast this year Pakistan launch their first Anime movie in cinema, "The Glassworker".😊

[@বাংলা_সাহিত্য]

@@GaionSputro 😁😁

[@TomcatE303]

AIM-54 had the longest range of any western missiles. It has shot down a target drone from 212 km away. It also had a massive 60 kg warhead. The AIM-260 JATM will have similar range. Meteor is also a good western 200 km class missile.

[@manuel969]

1 R 37M= 400 km 2 Astra MK3= 350 km 3 R 33s 2012= 305 km 4 AIM 260= 200 km 5 Meteor= 200 km 6 PL 20= 200 km 7 R 77M= 193 km 8 AIM 54= 190 km 9 R 27EM= 170 km 10 AIM 120D= 160 km 11 PL 15= 150 km 12 AAM-4B= 120 km

[@spinningsquare1325]

r-27em does not exist

[@arthurrod7638]

Manuel, according to your numbers (km range) 10 and 11 should swap places. You're welcome 😁

[@subasthapa4839]

I smell curry here 😂

[@nxp2619]

​@@subasthapa4839 but why tf Small eye Momos crying ? 💀😭

[@subasthapa4839]

@@nxp2619 meteor India using is an export variant with maximum range of 140 km.

[@anwarshah3305]

Good video ❤❤❤

[@AdamKennedy-j5w]

Another great video.

[@whytebearconcepts]

1:55 B-2 is the Spirit, not the Stratofortress. That's the B-52.

[@GaionSputro]

India for you

[@nemopode552]

Hello. I'm quite surprised no comment appears about the huge difference in capability of interception by a missile with active propulsion for all the flight long versus missile with propulsion working only at launch. And by the way this video doesn't talk about that very important feature of a missile. What do you think about?

[@Adil21RUS]

AIM 120 looks beautiful

[@Le0n007]

Did I hear good B-2 Stratofortress?? 1:56 😂😂😂

[@seaker9206]

The fighter jet only second to b21 raptor

[@GaionSputro]

India for you

[@mohmoudfarah1897]

The ones I was familiar with were the Sidewinders and the Sparrows; what are these you have -- especially the number one Monster? I ❤ it, though. Thank you for sharing this with us!

[@ivofigueira8138]

Les missiles iraniens sont les plus puissants et d une précision mortelle de très très loin les meilleurs Et les moins cher sur le marché Les experts iraniens sont sûrement les meilleurs aux mondes

[@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о]

R-37 it's hypersonic! Iran, china...😂

[@himanshuverma6241]

Proud Indian

[@Cane1992]

Anyone have an idea what the "no escape range" is of the AIM-260?

[@sweatybotfn9982]

For 100% no escape range is about 97km with less than 90 degrees in angle. Of corse, that’s excluding thrust vectoring and countermeasures

[@rhino6285]

Talk about confirmed kills at those ranges and I will believe it

[@sweatybotfn9982]

Confirmed kills on targets UAVs show these stats. The actual longest range kill by the AIM-120 is only 45kms and longest air to air kill by the R-37M is over 400km

[@Aryan-nv9kd]

@@sweatybotfn9982 B-b-but, Russian weapons are rusted junk and all the other countries are just not that advanced and muh Murica iz supposed to have da bezt missiles in da hood because we have da biggest defense budget in the hands of the most honest world leaders ever!

[@Sumitpande-fc4rs]

Sorry mate you will have to spy on militaries for that 😂😂

[@zaplakailol]

@@sweatybotfn9982 The R-37 did not hit anyone, this missile is only good according to Russian propaganda, but in reality there is no evidence of its use.

[@sweatybotfn9982]

@@zaplakailol yes there is. Search it up. If it was Russian prop I wouldn’t pull it to your face. And also, it’s better to look at things from more than one source so if Russia says it’s true, it might not be and if America says it’s propaganda, it might not be as well

[@donjobi9400]

🇷🇺🇨🇳🇮🇳😘💪💪💪

[@danmcha.84]

R-37 missiles from are Russian practically proven but some of the other are in development or their performance not well proven ni combat just only in training and online analysis.

[@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о]

R-37 it's hypersonic!

[@PeterMuskrat6968]

@@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о Everything is hypersonic if you lie about it cumrade!

[@bariman223]

Error on the "03. Astra Mk3." 350km = 270+ miles.

[@fahimsami321]

Stop bullshiting

[@jamesmartin9401]

They all look like the model rockets I used to fly as a kid, just way bigger obviously.

[@AizadSayid]

Some missile ranges are highly exaggerated and some are moderately exaggerated.

[@manuel969]

1) The PL 15 has a O. Range of 150 km not 200-300 and the PL 20 has only 200 km... China is lying and therefore exaggerating. 2) The R 33s had in 1981 an O. Range of 120 km, in 1999 an O. Range of 160 km and in 2012 an O. Range of 305 km... So, the R 33s actually have an O. Range of 305 km, not 160, we are not in 1999. 3) I don't believe in the operational range of the Astra MK3, i have my doubts in this apart.

[@SpruceWood-NEG]

You said China is lying. May I ask what your basis is? Please provide authentic evidence. Do you own these missiles?

[@patewing5808]

There is no statement about 120 km range for R-33 . On 18 August of 1993 was carried out a series of flying experiments on the interception of target at maximum range. In the course of the first of them the radio-controlled target, which flies at the height of 10.300 m with a velocity of 189 meters per second, was locked on by interceptor MiG-31 (flight altitude 8480 m, velocity - 669,3 meters per second) at the range if 319,5 kilometers the launch of rocket R-33 (successfully destroyed target) was carried out at the distance 228 kilometers. You should learn about test carried out on 21 April 1994 became the most effective flying experiment, which entirely demonstrated the possibility of aviation complex, on the simultaneous fire of four aerial targets.

[@tomcatkewell]

@@SpruceWood-NEG China Expo PL-15e to Pakistan on air show saying 145km range. They must lying for 5km short

[@SpruceWood-NEG]

@@tomcatkewell You need to understand what the foreign trade version is. The SH15 is a foreign trade version of an extended range projectile with a pitiful range of only 53 kilometers. PCL151 precision guided extended range ejection has a range of 79 kilometers. The DF21S ballistic missile sold to Saudi Arabia has a range of 3000 kilometers, while the DF21 missile used by China's roadbed has a range of 4000 kilometers. The same rocket launcher is sold to Pakistan for 290 kilometers, and the same model used by China for its own use is 500 kilometers.

[@tomcatkewell]

@@SpruceWood-NEG "CAUTION！ Do not remove the dead weight without authorize"

[@JoeyRay-fz1qe]

The US Phoenix is no longer in use but I think they now developed a new type they call the Phoenix now!

[@chrismillard8222]

I think Iran still use them and have a reverse engineered version. Starts with F I think like fahar or something

[@pradiptasarkar3308]

First picture is of India's Astra....wow....

[@ajinkyanalwade4332]

Where is French MICA?🤔🤔🤔

[@plaguedoctorkiller491]

The R-37M has a flight range of 250 km. And where is the Aim-174b missile?

[@aviator77migsukhoi34]

Hi to the author ! Hm, one question only, what were your sources for all of that data/ info ,military or civilian ones ? Some real data for you and others..... If you want to know some info about AAM, must know that launch weight, rocket engine's burn time ,flight profile of the AAM, then the so-called ''time of the aerodynamic stability and controllability'' are the most important factors for one AAM. Of course ,we have launch parameters like launch speed ( in fact ,the first speed of the AAM ) and launch altitude as also important. ''Longest range'' AAM in the World ? Let me write some details about that so-called ( in fact, wrongly named ) ''range''. It is not range but max authorised or by FCS as Fire Control System calculated launch distance. Launch distance against big/medium/small then non-maneuverable or highly maneuverable air target.Launch distance against incoming or receding air targets etc....AAM's launch parameters can be changed in sec.... In first place is a completely new Russian heavy, very long range hypersonic AAM type R-97 ( Product 810 ) for Su-57 only. With launch weight more than 700kgs and with real Vmax 8 Mach ( after acceleration phase) ,this AAM has the longest possible launch distance, well over 400 kms. On Aug 26 this AAM launched by Su-57 from a distance of over 200kms hit and shot down Ukr AF F-16AM ( pilot was KIA). Second is also Russian heavy, very long range hypersonic AAM type R-37M ( Product 610M ) with launch weight of almost 600kgs and with real Vmax 6 Mach. With this AAM it is possible to engage some incoming air targets from a distance of 400kms. Keep in mind that MiG-31BM can launch this AAM from 22 kms of altitude with real speed Mach 2.8 ( 3000km/h ) ! Fighters Su-30SM2 and Su-35S can also carry this AAM. On Oct 12 2022 one UkrAF tact recce aircraft Su-24MR was hit and shot down by R-37M launched by MiG-31BM and launch distance was 217kms. On Dec 2023 one Ukr AF MiG-29 was shot down by an R-37M launched from MiG-31BM ,launch distance was 125kms. Then in July 2024 one Ukr AF MiG-29 was shot down by an R-37M whose launch distance was 213kms. R-37M was launched by Su-35S. In third place is the Chinese heavy, very long range AAM type PL-17.This AAM is about 6m long and has about 500kgs launch weight. Max real V is 5 Mach. Max launch distance is in the range of 300-400kms. In fourth place is the new USN 'converted' heavy very long range supersonic AAM type AIM-174B .This AAM has launch weight about 860kgs but it is supersonic ( not hypersonic like Russian R-37M and R-97 or Chinese PL-17 ) with real Vmax only 4 Mach. F/A-18E SH can only launch this AAM with its real Vmax of 1.5M at only 15kms of altitude . Max possible launch distance is about 300 kms. In comparison with R-37M e.g. , it is about 100kgs heavier and 1m longer but has 50% less Vmax ( 4M vs 6M ). In fifth place are old Soviet heavy, very long range hypersonic AAM's R-33 and R-33S( as still operational on MiG-31BM). With the launch weights of about 500 and 520 kgs and with Vmax 5 Mach ,both AAM have a maximum launch distance of about 300kms. During one special test in 1985 where Tu-95MS strategic missile carrier acted like USAF strategic bomber/missiles carrier B-52H ( V=1000km/h, H=10kms ) over North Pole region was locked on and engaged ( was of course only simulation ) by R-33 AAM on one MiG-31 ( V=2500km/h ,H-21kms) from about 300kms of distance. In several tests and exercises during the 80's and 90's, R-33 and R-33S were launched from 200-250kms of distance against the real targets ( RC-aircraft , high flying supersonic missiles and drones). In sixth place is USN heavy long range supersonic AAM type AIM-54A/C Phoenix. With launch weight about 450kgs and with real Vmax 4.5 Mach this AAM could engage air targets from a distance of max 250kms. Max launch distances ever recorded were 203kms by USN F-14A in June 1973 and 244kms by IRIAF's F-14A in Jan 1979 ,both on tests. In seventh place is also new Russian 250kgs heavy long range hypersonic AAM type R-87 also known as Product 180 ( wrongly designated as K-77M ) and for Su-57 only .This AAM has constant ( cruise ) speed of Mach 5 because it has hypersonic ram-jet engine. Max launch distance is about 200kms. Note: AAM type AIM-260 JATM is not operational in USAF and AAM type R-27EM does not exist in fact. In eight place is the European MBDA Meteor as supersonic ram-jet powered AAM .With launch weight of 190kgs and max long range cruise speed of 4 Mach ,it has a max launch distance of 150kms. It is interesting to note that this AAM has max launch distance in the level of the 350kgs heavy Soviet AAM type R-27ER. 190kgs vs 350kgs but thanks to supersonic ram-jet and special flight profile it can achieve same launch distances as much heavier AAM like R-27ER. In ninth place is the Japanese AAM-4B, which is very modern and capable. With a launch weight of about 220kgs and max real V of 4.5 Mach ,this AAM has a maximum launch distance in the range 100-150kms. In tenth place are Russian AAM's type R-77-1 ( Product 170-1 ) and R-77-2 ( Product 171-1 and only for Su-57). Both AAM have launch weight about 200kgs and with max Vreal of 4.5-5 Mach have max launch distances 100-120kms. RuA&SF fighters Su-35S on several occasions engaged Ukr AF fighters MiG-29 and Su-27 with R-77-1 from a distance of about 100kms. Now where are that US AIM-120D AMRAAM and that Indian Astra Mk1 ? They are in eleventh and twelfth place. But why? They are small and light AAM's with the same body diameter of only 178mm and with launch weight of only about 160kgs ! So how can one AIM-120D that has a body diameter of 178mm, launch weight of about 160 kgs and with length less than 4m have a maximum launch distance of 160/180 kms as wiki tell us ? Even if it is ''nuclear powered'' ,it can not have such a big launch distance. AMRAAM means ''Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile'' not Long-range ! AIM-120D e.g. has a dual-pulse engine,yes, it is right ,but what is the weight of the solid rocket fuel to reach that big launch distance? Then in March 2021 happened this ( citation ): ''An F-15C Eagle fighter jet destroyed a target drone last month in the U.S. Air Force describes it as “the longest known air-to-air missile shot to date.” Exactly how far away the fighter was from its target when it fired the radar-guided AIM-120 AMRAAM missile has not been disclosed, but the test is a clear signal that the Air Force is making very long-range aerial engagements a priority.'' Next citation from the same article : ''An F-15C recorded the longest known air-to-air missile shot, firing an AIM-120 AMRAAM at a BQM-167 last month. Release doesn't say how long it was. So, China and Russia will have to guess, I suppose'' Next : ''While official performance figures are classified, it is generally assumed to be able to hit targets at a distance of between 75 and 100 miles. '' There is no way that AIM-120D can have a maximum launch distance of 160kms and my military source told me that AIM-120D was in fact launched in March 2021 from about 100kms away from the incoming target/drone. And in the end ,USAF planned to order several thousands of European MBDA Meteor . Why would they say that the AIM-120D has a max launch distance of 160 or 180 kms, whatever and Meteor has 150kms. Because AIM-120D certainly and simply has not so big launch distance as they used to mention.USAF at the end did not order Meteor because they waited for that AIM-260 JATM. Many sources state that the max launch distance of that AIM-260 will be about 200kms. 200kms ? And AIM-120D has 160 or 180kms ,so what progress is that? All mentioned values are for engaging big non-maneuvering air targets ,keep that in mind. For the real end, the largest ever recorded launch distance was achieved in April 1994 when prototype MiG-31M ( number 057 blue) launched 6 test AAM's type K-37 ( Product 610 ) on 6 differ targets where one of them was launched from record-breaking distance of 304kms and hit/shot down its given target.

[@nesseihtgnay9419]

these are all Fox 3 right?

[@HK-is9me]

👍

[@bjmccann1]

The B-2 Stratofortress?

[@commondo091]

Astra mk2 has 160 km

[@uzmakinarutoindia1617]

yes they have over estimated it . The missile real range is confidential . They should have mentioned 160km.

[@harshitrai5306]

​​@@uzmakinarutoindia1617abe mk1 mk2 mk3 three varient hai mk3 ki range 300-350 km hai

[@harshitrai5306]

Astra mk3 ki baat ho rhe hai hai Astra mk2 ki nhi

[@pradiptasarkar3308]

@@uzmakinarutoindia1617 we are not china that says its missile has 300 km range but turns out to be only 125 km

[@makavelikhan3855]

Amraam 120D3 rage is 185 km

[@scottagamer]

Lol, the ASTRA in 3rd? No way.

[@tanishqbafila5739]

It's to please the Indian audience. It's under development

[@somubhai5882]

I can see the pain in you guys.

[@gunboundmagFires]

@@somubhai5882 lol

[@Pratikdd]

Mk3 is under trail phase. Its is not in operation.

[@sanasshushu3905]

Yaa it should be first right 👍 , but yaa there is a medicine in market knows as burnol use it rn 😂

[@pashapasovski5860]

Which one,strike that Two,were used against Chinese Weather baloon 😅

[@qwilder9680]

US Report PLA Starting covertly equipment PL-21 since 2016.... it range 500-600KM, support by AWACS. UAV and bomber can carry the missle to attach enemy's AWACS or Air tanker.

[@DirkDiggler-qp3vm]

Americans Aim 260 has entered the chat.

[@bobo-cc1xw]

Us airforce never goes into a fight without it being a seal clubbing grade aventure So it just shows you what this nice sm6 we already have 1000s of can do

[@geldoncupi1]

Where did you find these numbers!?🤣🤣🤣

[@macarrao1065]

400km, they say !!!😂😂😂

[@jeanclaude24]

Very disappointing if the AIM-260 range is only 200km

[@uzmakinarutoindia1617]

200 is also enough . during engagement only no escape zone do matters. all the details about missiles are absurd in the video.

[@johnsilver9338]

AIM-120D can already reach 180km. Then their is the latest iteration AIM-120D3. Then AIM-260. Doubtful if its 200km. But for stealth a longer range is not a problem. It can just get in close enough as no fighter radar can detect 5th gen stealth at beyond visual range. Even if its radar is as strong as an AWACS, it will only be able to detect F-35 at a 100km or so.

[@jeanclaude24]

@@johnsilver9338 I was hoping the AIM-260 would have a max range of at least 300km.

[@johnsilver9338]

​@@jeanclaude24 Within 250 - 300km is plausible. However it's not range but its multi-mode seeker that sets AIM-260 JATM apart from other missiles like PL-15.

[@jeanclaude24]

@@johnsilver9338 So range isn't all that?

[@asarkar8260]

How could you know

[@dhineshg67]

Sfdr technology... (Astra mk3)

[@Rangera-ct1xu]

as long as American fighter Air Craft are required to visually ID the target, who cares if the missile can go beyond 15 miles. funny, the bad guys do not have that same restriction.

[@Variable-2-actual]

Yes, those are our peace time rules. War time rules are different.

[@ricky1231]

Those Russain air air missiles are not performing as advertised in Ukraine

[@veritasliberabitvos454]

The long range ones have done nicely. Russia sorted out the ability for other systems to guide the missile compared to the plane that fired it. They did a similar thing with the S400 missiles. The Russians are always thinking and changing things, that is one thing the Ukraine war has shown. The other is Russia does not fight wars like the west or Israel, Israel killed more children in two weeks than Russia has killed as civilians in over 2 years. Or less than civilians by drone strikes by USA in other countries USA is not at war with.

[@patewing5808]

You writing ultimate nonsense , Russian A-A missiles were extremely effective and deadly ask honest Ukrainian pilot and how many died having no clue what hit them

[@alfredjr2k556]

All I know is Visual Range Air To Air Missile VRAAM.

[@sanasshushu3905]

Hmm yaa but BVR is more advance and have longer range + enhanced tracking system of it's own

[@hj.maryatimaryati7181]

👍👍

[@Worldinfohindi]

First

[@niewiemcoturobie-xf8fy]

Congrats

[@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365]

R37 💪

[@PeterMuskrat6968]

Range is important, but what is more important is the range of the No-Escape Zone. The great part about the AIM-260 is that it's going to have a throttleable Solid Fuel Rocket Motor on it... which allows it to either just do a full burn to the target or throttle it back to conserve fuel and extend its range. Combine this with pretty much the best electronics and guidance systems out of any missiles on this list... its going to pretty much be the best at distance and closer ranges. the Russian missiles are pretty much only good for large slow moving aircraft. (AWACS, Bombers etc.) By the way, the AIM-260 is one of half a dozen missile programs being worked on...its just the closest to service. We also have the Peregrine, which has the same range as the AIM-120D but only half the size... which allows double the normal amount to be carried. SPAMRAAM type shit.

[@drbendover7467]

I wouldn't go by what Russians and Chinese claim:)

[@djordjetodorovic4176]

Yea.... I agree, west never lied about anything😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@ЮрийКуличев-ж6о]

China- yes, they it's stuped, only copy and back ingeniring.

[@stefphoenix9642]

LOL the missile 's range exceed the range view of the jet fighter radar , how they can shoot that they can t detect in war condition ?

[@jmbig]

Magic !! ☝️😵‍💫😵‍💫

[@pradiptasarkar3308]

ever heard anything abt AWACS ??

[@Variable-2-actual]

AWAC's radar range is like 400 to 600 miles or so.

[@stefphoenix9642]

i say : "in real war condition" AWACS will be the first target, long range missiles work in peace time conditions versus a target drone but the facts and the optimistic tests are not the same things

[@Ewan_Gaming]

Where you heard in this video about "hit" "war" and so on? There are just numbers of longest potential range. If somebody tries to compare all aspects it will be 10 hours video of speculation because of only real war with friendly information exchange can show the truth but it is impossible fantasy.

[@b21raider27]

Range is irrelevant, the most important is the no escape zone. NEZ: These tend to be low to very low range from what I read (speculations online, all the real data is obviously classified). 4th Gen aircraft will not even spot a top stealth fighter like the F-22 or F-35 in time. One of the shortest range ones here could thus be the best missile…however my $ is on the AIM-260.

[@trull122]

USA just successfully tested a live AGM-183A Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon, or ARRW. It travels 1,600 km.

[@Sumitpande-fc4rs]

Just launched 😂😂😂it's been there for years 😂😂😂

[@ЕгорФролов-э2н]

Эту программу уже закрыли) эта ракета ни разу не пролетела более 400 км

[@Someone-cj4np]

It is a air to ground missle

[@jeanclaude24]

You're right but I don't think the 183A is considered an AAM

[@a5cent]

Completely different thing. Not related to AA

[@Hyposonic]

So many mistakes and falsehoods to take seriously--like previous videos from this channel. Pay more attention! The commenters know far more than the content creators.

[@ACE99999]

Bharmos air to air check ✅

[@billwalker9509]

Astra range 3.5 miles?

[@speedmanwx]

My money on PL17电线杆

[@sasmac1829]

KS 172 is missing here

[@RoHo702]

It never made it into production, and is more of phantomware than an AAM.

[@billabel4482]

ASTRA MK3 still under testing, not in service yet.

[@rumahkubagus2198]

The best air to air missile is come from INDONESIA.they call SANTET, max range is 1.000 km.this secret weapons....

[@tejasvlog09]

Meteor is French or USA?

[@neldthok297]

French

[@tony18662]

Multi national European Sweden France Germany and England MDBA. Its standard Missile to Jas 39 Gripen. (The first nation to have them in active service was Sweden.) The only missile on the list in active deployment that has the most advanced targeting system that works in highly ECM contested environments. we have also modified the Finish F 35 to carry the missile in the end of 2024 that will including England that will follow be the only F 35 that will be able to carry them in their Modified weapons bays . The rest of European F35 users will most likely follow in the future. (What people dont realize these missiles are quite large they need to fit eternal weapons bays.)

[@Sumitpande-fc4rs]

​@@tony18662 seeker French Propulsion British & to some extend French Controls systems Germany Rest all components come from rest of the European nations. Which are not that important technologies.

[@tony18662]

@@Sumitpande-fc4rs body and warhead was developed by Sweden read on wiki : Forebody The active radar proximity fuze subsystem (PFS) is provided by Saab Bofors Dynamics (SBD). The PFS detects the target and calculates the optimum time to detonate the warhead in order to achieve the maximum lethal effect.[58] The PFS has four antennae, arranged symmetrically around the forebody. The Impact Sensor is fitted inside the PFS. Behind the PFS is a section containing thermal batteries, provided by ASB, the AC Power Supply Unit, and the Power and Signal Distribution Unit. In August 2003 SBD received a contract worth SEK 450 million to develop the PFS.[58] here is something that is not on wiki MBDA was founded 2001 to allow nations outside NATO to collaborate and upgrade weapons programs Mainly Sweden Finland South Korea and Japan. that's why for example the K2 tank will be Poland's new main battle tank. NATO nations wasn't allowed to purchase systems outside NATO before 2001 (combability issues )

[@TheArgieH]

​@@tony18662Just England? Whatever happened to Scotland, Wales and Norn Island? UK is a better term, for the moment at least. ❤

[@uzmakinarutoindia1617]

hats off from india for typing error /// 350km/3.5m and astra range might be above 300km in ur dreams but its officially its around 120km . So no need for the over hype range.

[@shawnthesheep5374]

Teri jali naaa 😂😂😂😂

[@dev.sh.]

Uninformed people like you make comments like these.Astra mk1 which is already inducted has range of 110 km,astra mk2 around 160-200 km finale test being done,and astra mk3 with range of 300-350 kms for awacs sized targets has also been tested.Pls get some info before commenting not just comment anything because of jealousy.

[@shawnthesheep5374]

@@dev.sh. Yes bro he is probably chuslim

[@uzmakinarutoindia1617]

Acha bro mk 3 enroll hogya . Mei toh update hu hi nhi mujhe laga bas mk 1 enroll hua hai jiska sayad 120 paper range tha. Koina 350 wala bhi 4-5 saal mei enroll + mass produce ho jayega

[@sanasshushu3905]

Bruh even Astra mark 2 offical range is over 150 km and it's well know that astra mark 3 will going to have 350 approx km range , it's going to at same category of Metor missile of European weapon system, and no one is hyping it's just facts, u r the only one having anxiety attack here , go watch ur anime weeb

[@ivan-ln1j]

Between all of this freeks only Aim-120 and Meteor really exist))

[@dafapancawildana2237]

R37M?

[@lingth]

PL-15?

[@davidtaylor8002]

Actually, the AIM-54 Phoenix really exists, too. Its just not in use anymore since the only aircraft capable using it was retired in 2006.

[@drgonzo305]

No, they all exist. Some are still in testing and some of the Russian and Chinese claims about range are doubtful

[@markv3560]

@drgonzo305 keep underestimating your opponents

[@Hwasoonyee]

PL-15 range is kind of Chinese bull shit data. Considering the diameter of the missile and it's length, it is impossible to get range at 200~300km. The actual range has been considered around 140~160 Km.

[@maynamar2517]

Meteor the rest is a bullshits

[@sweatybotfn9982]

😂😂😂kid…

[@mirsadikic3215]

You forgot gokdogan missile from Turkey who has range of 245 km?! Always you forget Turkish made weapon?!!!

[@ЕгорФролов-э2н]

R 33M 228 km

[@SOLDADODESCONHECIDO]

☢

[@niewiemcoturobie-xf8fy]

second

[@Worldinfohindi]

Congratulations

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

Latest AIM 120D3 range is 180km

[@Sumitpande-fc4rs]

Not it is official stated to have 160km even I have heard of 153km by some officials of rtx aka raytheon

[@johnsilver9338]

If you read at f-16()net forums, their are simulations where AIM-120D can reach even further. Replace () with a dot.

[@ShoehornBundy]

The Storm Shadow from the UK is known to travel.

[@lucaj8131]

Its air to ground...

[@romankovalev7894]

Not so fast yet Britain

[@subasthapa4839]

What a joke, just to please curry guys

[@marianoea7971]

😂

[@romy0079]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Felix-bj1pe]

Guys, the Russians are making the most advanced missiles

[@Adil21RUS]

Yes, we do

[@gennadiyplotnitskiy7517]

Yes russia is the only country who uses lamps in their missiles, most of the world gave that up about 80 years ago but not russia… most advanced NOT

[@Variable-2-actual]

Wow, obviously hasn't been keeping up with the news or is really mentally deficient. Their most advanced missile was shot down last month by a Ukrainian patriot battery and it wasn't going mach 6.

[@НиколайЮжаков-м7ф]

​@@Variable-2-actualNo it's not so.

[@trexticonkwan8279]

Lol china missile 400km haha their radar also can't track so far, how the missile can shoot so far, joke

[@MustafaAhmedQureshi88]

Lol😂

[@Necto_v_nectoivii]

С учётом как врёт Россия, дальность можно уменьшить в раза 3-4

[@НиколайЮжаков-м7ф]

Длббствуешь чуб?

[@lingth]

Its strange the Top 5 missiles are all not from USA.

[@a5cent]

The US has not invested in this capability for a very long time. A longer range missile is currently in development, but isn't ready yet.

[@elsenm3965]

Because this list is stupid and wrong. Be assured that only Meteor and AIM are really effective.

[@sweatybotfn9982]

It’s been a long time since China overtook us in Missile. And soon radar. I’m not a CCP bot, like some TikTok kids would say. I’m just being realistic, trying to get people to realize how dangerous it is and get our asses to work

[@sweatybotfn9982]

@@elsenm3965 really? I would keep an eye on the Chinese missiles. All the Chinese jokes aside they achieved everything they said they will

[@Variable-2-actual]

You don't seem to understand propaganda do you.

[@cvdheyden]

Meteor is the best one. The list is bs.

[@elonstark4000]

Nah the US has better. We just don't know it

[@a5cent]

lol. Cope The US will get better stuff soon. Just still in development.

[@sreesree6395]

❤india😊

[@Akshaya101]

INDIAN ASTRA MK3 has the latest technology in this line up….and the fastest 5 mach…

[@Carlos-cy4uc]

🤦🤦🤦🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

Latest AIM 120D3 range is 180km

[@frankcessna7345]

Can you show a link to a valid, authoritative source? I don’t think so…

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

@@frankcessna7345 The AIM-120D is an upgraded version of the AMRAAM with improvements in almost all areas, including 50% greater range (than the already-extended range AIM-120C-7) and better guidance over its entire flight envelope yielding an improved kill probability (Pk). Initial production began in 2006 under the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase of program testing and ceased in September 2009.[38] Raytheon began testing the D model on August 5, 2008, the company reported that an AIM-120D launched from an F/A-18F Super Hornet passed within lethal distance of a QF-4 target drone at the White Sands Missile Range.[39] The range of the AIM-120D is classified, but is thought to extend to about 100 miles (160 km) or potentially up to 112 miles (180 km).[40] Source:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM

[@targetaps]

​@frankcessna7345 The actual range is classified, and the only thing the U.S. said about the test is that it achieved the longest range air to air kill on a drone target.

[@soumyajitsingha9614]

@@frankcessna7345 Source: AIM 120 Wikipedia

[@johnsilver9338]

@@frankcessna7345 "The range of the AIM-120D is classified, but is thought to extend to about 100 miles (160 km) or potentially up to 112 miles (180 km)" - Wiki But if you read at f-16()net forums, their are simulations where AIM-120D can reach even further. Replace () with a dot.