Top 4 Prioritization techniques in Product Management explained simply

  Рет қаралды 9,752

David Pereira

David Pereira

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 20
@lamanmahammadli2963
@lamanmahammadli2963 2 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you mentioned the gut feeling. It is always debatable how much you should rely on your gut feeling, especially when you are new to the product or industry. I personally like scoring methods like ICE/RICE because confidence has equal weight as the other criteria. Hippos also have a gut feeling, like every other stakeholder. The determining factor on what to tackle next could be a high confidence rate gained through previous learnings, user or market research.
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 2 жыл бұрын
Hey Laman, I perceive prioritization as a reflection exercise. What matters most now is what I want to focus on, and then identify opportunities to benefit from. Scoring methods are helpful but demanding and the numbers can distract us. Just be careful with that. The value matrix helps us have a conversation around the relevant metrics. Different than HiPPO approach, we can evaluate with more people and reason on it. The danger of HiPPO is the mindset, I want that done because I believe to be the right thing. That is insufficient as it doesn’t compare with other options. A bias towards action is what has helped me in this world.
@dollaya8893
@dollaya8893 Жыл бұрын
This is helpful. Thank you so much
@petertoth6973
@petertoth6973 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the overview which was a important reminder :) helped me in my current situation!
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 2 жыл бұрын
Nice to hear from you Peter. Which part helped you?
@petertoth6973
@petertoth6973 2 жыл бұрын
@@DavidPereira88 for me the most important part was the reminder to keep thinks simple as prioritization is still a looot of gut feeling. You know it yourself: you are the sole PO, trying hard to keep the Product Vision running while everybody is coming up with requests... so while saying "no" almost all the time, you somehow try to find a way to organize the chaos, which can be time consuming... here a friendly reminder like "make it simple" helps to re-focus and invest time better :)
@irajt5667
@irajt5667 11 ай бұрын
This is a great channel. I wish i had found it before. Thank you David...so very insightful and helpful.
@cyberpunk.386
@cyberpunk.386 4 ай бұрын
The issue with primarily going for the low hanging fruit in the matrix is that you're not chasing the bets enough. They equally deliver value, but are harder and also need to be prioritised. Some developments are hard and do deliver good value and therefore are equally worth chasing.
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 4 ай бұрын
If the goal is to deliver value, benefiting from what drives that fast is often a wise choice. Yet, I do not recommend neglecting bets; instead, I recommend balancing, knowing that bets may fail to drive value and that the costs are high. Balance is the key.
@cyberpunk.386
@cyberpunk.386 4 ай бұрын
@@DavidPereira88 Agree. There's also an element of short term vs. long term goals. Low hanging fruit usually deliver ROI in the short term, while the bets have longer ROIs.
@guerreirodancante
@guerreirodancante 4 ай бұрын
🤣 I laughed loud on "if you want to fail, you prioritize based on this animal" 😂😂
@baozarzakariyyah8351
@baozarzakariyyah8351 9 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 9 ай бұрын
Welcome :)
@sahils007in
@sahils007in 2 жыл бұрын
Great video!!
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sahil. Which part did you enjoy the most?
@sahils007in
@sahils007in 2 жыл бұрын
@@DavidPereira88 I like the matrix technique very much!!
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 2 жыл бұрын
@@sahils007in Cool! I am happy to know it.
@ermanmanyasli
@ermanmanyasli Жыл бұрын
I guess your quadrant in min 6 is a bit incorrect. If stg is not easy to build & also doesn't promise that much impact, it is waste of time. hence, you need to replace reds and grey circles' positions in your quadrant imho.
@DavidPereira88
@DavidPereira88 Жыл бұрын
Not really. Easiness of implementation means how quickly you can implement. The more to the right, the quicker. Meaning that the beginning is hard.
@mitchelroe7829
@mitchelroe7829 6 ай бұрын
@@DavidPereira88 I just watched this and came to comment the same thing as @erman… but then noticed you’re using “Easiness” instead of the more common “Difficulty” that we normally see on these graphs. If the X axis were difficulty, then you would need to swap red and grey… but should also have a swap between green and orange. With difficulty on the bottom you would get a reverse result of: High return, low effort=green High return, high effort=orange Low return, low effort=grey Low return, high effort=red
Product Backlog Refinement: What NOT to do
11:51
David Pereira
Рет қаралды 18 М.
Chain Game Strong ⛓️
00:21
Anwar Jibawi
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
Mom Hack for Cooking Solo with a Little One! 🍳👶
00:15
5-Minute Crafts HOUSE
Рет қаралды 23 МЛН
Value vs Effort Prioritization Method
11:17
Relab Studios
Рет қаралды 8 М.
No one told me THIS about Product Management!
12:07
PM Diego Granados
Рет қаралды 26 М.
How To Prioritize A Product Backlog? | #6
11:37
Vibhor Chandel
Рет қаралды 88 М.
Project Management vs Product Management vs Business Analysis | Which Career Path Should You Choose?
16:45
Ogaga Johnson (Project Management Coach)
Рет қаралды 18 М.
How to Prioritize Tasks at Work [PRO PRIORITIZATION TECHNIQUES]
7:19
Adriana Girdler
Рет қаралды 32 М.
Should You Become a Product Owner?
5:43
Mountain Goat Software
Рет қаралды 11 М.
What does a Product Manager do? (2024)
14:53
CareerFoundry
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Chain Game Strong ⛓️
00:21
Anwar Jibawi
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН