Top 5 Cheapest Bush Airplanes 2022-2023 | Price & Specs

[@AviationFederation]

*Is it pronounced as “stol” or “s-tol”? We’ve heard both, so please sound off here in the comments section! To see more interesting aircraft videos, check these out:* Top 3 Most Popular 6-Seater Single-Engine Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZvXpmyflq2sqsU Top 5 Cheapest Personal Aircraft Under $25K 2022-2023 | Price & Specs kzbin.info/www/bejne/laqlan6Dr9uAeM0 Top 5 Cheapest Classic Single-Engine Piston Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price Comparison kzbin.info/www/bejne/g2TEiHt7rdWNoNk

[@RedBullOficialSupport]

It is pronounced "stol" as said by multiple manufacturers

[@backcountryaviators]

Great video. One correction in the description of the video, the Zenith STOL CH-701 can only hold 2 passengers. The big brother, the CH-801 (which we own) can hold 4, but is more expensive.

[@garrycompton7214]

Short takeoff or landing .

[@NicolasBRENTA]

@@RedBullOficialSupport Correct, a STOL aircraft is a Short Take Off and Landing plane ;)

[@ricobennett5598]

You don't call it a p-lane so why would you call it s-tol?

[@robgoffroad]

Keep in mind that you can expect to spend an additional $80-100k on top of the kit price to finish it; the kit prices doesn't include avionics ($30k or so), engine ($40k) and paint.

[@AviationFederation]

Thank you for the additional information regarding the cost of finishing a kit-built aircraft. It's important to keep in mind that the initial kit price is just one part of the total cost of building an aircraft, and there are many additional expenses that can add up quickly. Builders will also need to factor in the cost of tools, materials, and any specialized equipment or services that may be required.

[@TheGrobe]

thank you! knowing what an old used Cub or an ultralight costs, I knew there was something wrong with obtaining an actual airplane for that price, even if I had to put it together! it’s easy to get excited though, so better to be let down now. 🥲

[@datgio4951]

That’s fkn depressing

[@joshlower1]

You can just buy the entire plane built for the same price

[@neilkaippallil8390]

Maximum Flight travel range should be shown in Discription box...if not displayed

[@philipcampbell7216]

What is the range of each of these aircraft?

[@kellyrobinson1780]

They don't talk about rollout, landing distance, or endurance, either, but I expect that the websites for each plane would list those data.

[@AviationWP]

The Zenith STOL CH 701 can accommodate up to four passengers? But if you want to take off you need to just have two, you know, in the two seats.

[@AviationFederation]

Yes, you're absolutely correct. This ensures that the aircraft remains within its weight and balance limits and maintains safe operating conditions during this critical phase of flight. Apologies for the oversight!

[@davidholubetz177]

I wouldn't trust anything you hear on KZbin ... this channel seems like AI with a bot voice transcript

[@MinhTháiTrần-o8i]

Mẫu phi cơ của bạn rất tinh tế và ấn tượng, hay lắm cảm ơn video chia sẻ của bạn chúc bạn sức khỏe và hạnh phúc.

[@AviationFederation]

Cảm ơn những nhận xét tích cực của bạn về mô hình máy bay! Rất vui vì bạn thích video này. Nếu có bất kỳ điều gì khác mà bạn muốn biết hoặc thảo luận về máy bay, đừng ngần ngại bắt đầu cuộc trò chuyện.

[@ludwigrieger7556]

I am in my 13 th year of scratch building my four place 260hp Bearhawk, according to my understanding it is one of the best in its class, ranging from the two place all the way to the 6 place in five models. Cant wait to fly mine

[@kwanelemthunzi1311]

Hahaha really

[@Backwards_Y]

I noticed that you included the Kitfox aircraft speedster instead of the STI version which has beefed stol performance

[@AviationFederation]

That’s right. We might update this list with more value for money options soon.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

I just saw a separate vid on the Zenith. The claimed takeoff AND landing distance is 100 ft., with a rate of climb of 3000-4000 ft/min. That's what the manufacturer SAID, anyway. This is for the SuperSTOL XL (extra long?). The upped the HP from 100 to 180, and extended the fuselage 2 ft., moving the CG aft to compensate for the heavier engine.

[@suniron]

Hello from India. We should manufacture such beautiful planes in India ...these could be so useful in remote areas ...for supplying essentials ✨️ 👌 😍

[@OnlyGhostType]

Get to it!

[@AlanThomas-hp3fn]

Yes, you should. India can manufacture for about 1/3 the cost of the US Canada or Europe. Taxes insurance lawyers wildly expensive labor costs.

[@pilotblue6535]

All excellent planes in their own right. All have strengths and weaknesses. Aluminum vs fabric vs Carbon fiber. Carburetor vs Fuel Injection. Steam gauges vs Glass cockpit. Stored in a Hangar vs Outside. Float/ ski capable? The kit prices (Amateur Home Built) never includes the Firewall forward (engine, exhaust, coolers, sensors, cowl), Propeller ($2-12,000), Panel, paint and / or finishing. As an aircraft builder, count on 2-5X the kit price to complete. Experienced builder with a work space count on 18 months to build. Inexperienced builder working in a home garage 3-10 years. Advantage to Home built is owner maintenance (huge cost saving - annual and routine service). Down side - documentation of the builder using Approved Aeronautical Building Standards or are they using the local hardware / auto store. Yes, the plane will be examined prior to first flight but what then later? Cheap bolts fracture. Non aviation Rivets corrode. Lots of sketchy stuff flying.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

Pilot blue: well done.👍 Good info.

[@S2StrategicDefense]

The Zenith 701 cannot take 4 passengers. The 750 cannot even take 4.

[@pilotblue6535]

Go with the 801 then.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

From Wikipedia, "Phone Booth Stuffing": "On March 20, 1959, students at the Durban, South Africa YMCA set a world record when 25 of them were able to squeeze at least the greater portions of their bodies into a standard upright phonebooth." Just sayin'...

[@joedeleon1189]

Hello... No cub on your list? As in SuperCub or CarbonCub, for instance? Weird I thought they where it, up there in Bush country. Nice video though.

[@AviationFederation]

Thanks for the feedback! The Supercub with a 180 hp Lycoming engine fetches a price tag of around US$100K, so we feel it deserves its own category or price range. Although, we have a new video coming up next week featuring the American Legend MOAC! Please stay tuned.

[@adventureus8604]

I was going to say, the answer is in the title. "Cheapest"

[@Jerry10939]

The only taildragger planes I have flown are the Aeronca Champ and Decathlon.

[@CROWOLF87]

My Grandfather took me to the little airport a few miles from their house. We'd sit in the car and watch the single engines take off and land. Still remember Fleet Week in the SF Bay and the Blue Angels flying under the bridge while standing on a submarine. 👍

[@AviationFederation]

It sounds like you have some wonderful memories of aviation! We can imagine how exciting it must have been to watch the planes take off and land, as well as witnessing Fleet Week and the Blue Angels in action. Those experiences must have truly left a lasting impression. We enjoy reading aviation stories like this. Thanks for sharing!

[@ayokay123]

Advantages/disadvantages of these STOLs versus say gyroplanes? They're both equally slow, but I've seen STOL experts take off in less than 30ft. in competitions.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

What's an "advantage" or "disadvantage"? You have to know what you WANT the aircraft to do. If you just want to get in the air the fastest, and don't care about anything else, then maybe a gyrocopter, if you're not one of those experts you mentioned.🙄

[@MSPhysicsForFun]

Zenith stol ch701 is my choice, the tundra tyre would be fun.

[@hermestresmegistrus]

I have some experience with some bushes; They’re very beautiful to look at✨

[@johnfairchild3421]

I got into one. And man like to have not gotten out. But as A. Good. Warrior I went. Right back in til it was. Trimmed.inside out

[@MelvinCruz]

Nice video,I was looking for some good basics of the best planes in this category, this one gave me what I was looking for

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro

[@War3lephant]

So which one is the klr650 equivalent? Cheap, reliable takes a beating, does everything but not well.

[@itinensanzen]

Hi Sophie, i love all planes but the Superstol is just amazing. Nice video, keep up the good work.

[@circusfactory]

I wonder which dealer has the prices you mentioned. must be fire wall back prices?

[@DanielHunterUSA]

Yeah the price is right with out instruments and engine that would be more like $60,000

[@johnhorgan9295]

Love them all👍

[@timhuckabay]

The prices might be for unassembled kits without engines or avionics. They definitely aren’t for completed aircraft.

[@mattivirta]

buy used cessna can buy million used cessna 172-182 in usa, most popular plane what has made and used can buy 20K-50K normal 30K can buy ready to fly condition good cessna.

[@treetopflight7624]

@@mattivirta new vs 50 year old plane needing engine overhaul. Decent 1970s 172 is around $80K.. Again, new vs 50 years old. No wrong answer, just different plane.

[@jeffcardillo]

"This kitfox costs over $41k US". The video isn't wrong... the green and black one from the video is up on trade-a-plane right now for $195k. That certainly is more.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

Still a kit in parts, or has somebody built a kit into a fully finished, flying aircraft? That could have something to do with it.

[@zablonskys1]

I would prefer the Zenith , due to its retractable wings .

[@JDStone-jg8cg]

I'd love to get a Zenith CH801 as it's a four seat version of the 701. Though it doesn't have the retractable wings . . .

[@el_nesto1844]

You have a lot of freedom in America, here in Spain you can make a kit plane but you need a lot of certificates so its cheaper to buy an already built one

[@Niftynefty]

All are awesome

[@garrycompton7214]

Flew a 170 in Ak for over 20 years - soooo What size engines are in these birds - that's kind of Important !

[@AviationFederation]

That's amazing and you're absolutely right; the size and type of engines are crucial factors in evaluating aircraft performance. We'll do our best to add more relevant information in our future episodes.

[@mishasumi6827]

40 inches wide? That is my shoulder to shoulder measurement. Lol

[@bertclements]

What about Maule or Carbon Cub, too expensive?

[@AviationFederation]

While the pricing varies, Maule and Carbon Cub are generally considered valuable investments for those seeking robust performance in bush flying. Do you have specific features or requirements in mind for a bush plane that you find essential?

[@sikrandall83]

Where is there a zenith 701 that holds 4 passengers?

[@numeric.alphabet]

What if gear of tyre should be tilted into body..

[@kellyrobinson1780]

You mean retractable landing gear? Not done for this class of aircraft. Too complex, too heavy, too expensive, with unnecessary maintenance.

[@coeniethomas1887]

How do you fit 4 people into a CH701?

[@pfer10]

2 in the seats and 2 on top of the wings. Lol

[@juanbaitx8740]

CH 801 it's a 4 place ulm

[@mattivirta]

@@juanbaitx8740 perfect have small economy 4-seat plane. go to city to city cheap plane shopping or holiday trip.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

Speedos or bikinis (depending), cocoa butter, and a big shoe horn. Preferably, they'll also all be good at "Twister". Or make the 3 who are not the pilot 6 years old or less.

[@johnrobinson1140]

I think light sport or less than 1320 GVW is a better way to go, like a Carbon Cub for instance.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

If all you're taking from A too B is yourself, then could be. It just depends on what you want out of your plane. "Better" is a subjective term. If somebody wants to haul cargo, or get there quicker, have a higher ceiling or more range, "better" would probably be different for them.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

EDIT: That's, "A TO B". I hate spell-check.

[@BlueMax333]

prices need to make it clear if it is ready-to-fly or not. Engine, ancillaries and a modern instrument panel can double the price.

[@DES2nd9512]

the kitfox series 7 speedster is not a bushplane. the kitfox series 7 STI however is a bush plane.

[@NicolasBRENTA]

4 PASSENGERS in the STOL CH701 ???

[@edwardwerthner7717]

So much time to build these planes, but worth it

[@neilkaippallil8390]

Approx Flight Travel range should be shown

[@paulkysar6207]

Opps. Lush Amazon..... All the trees in the background were Douglas fir. They don't grow anywhere near the Amazon

[@soundmandave21]

Your prices are way off. You are quoting fuselage kit prices that are missing firewall forward components which is the most expensive part...

[@meenubhai7055]

Love from India🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@williamhulsey9209]

I have to say that the whole concept of seeking out the cheapest plane to trust your life to in the harsh flight environment of the bush is very much like looking for the lowest bid from a brain surgeon. In 6 years in Alaska my son's pastor and two passengers flew off apparently to be wth God, since they've never been seen since. a Beaver with six people was struck by another two seater flown by a State rep...all 7 people died in my son's back yard. I did meet an 85 year old bush pilot in Anchorage who had walked away from a handful of crashes. But really, guys, a bush plane is only a couple of steps safer than jumping off a mountain in a Wing Suit.

[@AviationFederation]

We can understand your concern and apprehension regarding the safety of bush planes. It is true that flying in small aircraft, particularly in remote areas with harsh weather conditions, can be inherently risky. However, it is also important to note that many bush pilots are highly experienced and well-trained individuals who take safety very seriously. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to weigh the risks and benefits of flying in a bush plane, and to make an informed decision based on their personal comfort level and safety concerns.

[@williamhulsey9209]

@@AviationFederation when I worked for the air force at Tinker AFB just out of college I met a lot of small plane enthusiasts. Many had bought surplus Stearman's after the war. Heard no horror stories, although I met one guy who had lived on an acreage outside Wichita with a Supercub? Who took off by attaching a cable to a swiveling post and going round and round in a circle till he was airborne and then releasing the cable. But once I spent time in Alaska I realized that an awful lot of the pilots I met or heard about tended to think flying was just only slightly different from driving a car. Not true at all, I thought your article might appeal to folks like that. Lost a couple of good friends in S Texas flying home from Houston (school architect and two school board members) because the red hang tag in the cockpit that showed some of the controls were locked had faded and torn in two. Crashed on takeoff. And then there was the local young crop duster took up the elementary school librarian to show her how safe flying was. Fatal crash in a cotton field outside Sinton. My wife's uncle and his brother flew commercial jets for their whole working life. In their 80's now, so obviously......a safe pilot is one from the deep end of the gene pool.....shallow end maybe not (I would count myself in the shallow end, based on 50 years of mishaps).

[@Chris_at_Home]

Living here for over 40 years I know many people who went right from flying a plane to getting angel wings. I’ve had jobs where I was flown all over the state in different types of aircraft from Beavers on floats to Citation Jets and helicopters. I’ve had a few exciting flights. I even had a 7ECA Champion for 8 years about 40 years ago. It cost only $9,000 in 1985.

[@kellyrobinson1780]

Well said, AF.

[@ahmednegm9895]

Murphy radical is the best

[@murphyaircraft]

With only 2 Radical flying, how can it be the best? The Murphy Rebel should be on this list based on price and actual flying "bush" airplanes.

[@SuperOrangello]

I don’t like the limited visibility out of the cabin

[@antonioiozzi9171]

Much confusion in the title and description. The price you mention are kitprices and not that of a finished one. No engine, not elecronic and instruments. Showing the Kitfox Speedster that is the acro version of the S7 say everything.

[@LTDan-hu5fq]

All of these fine airplanes cost close to 95,000 dollars to complete!

[@ZeeCaptainRon]

I bet if you tried you could find even more annoying foreground music, since it sure isn't background music.

[@loriscandy]

Prices are definitely not up to date... or maybe they are the kits' prices with no engine nor instruments.

[@treetopflight7624]

Prices are clearly kit prices WITHOUT engine (30K-40K), without avionics (minimum 20K-40K), and without paint (10K-$20K)..

[@porschetech72901]

like the video good job.... prices are a bit off i think.... double or more for most part

[@user-393cbm]

Greenhorn aboard… 🇺🇸♾️😎

[@waltersempticowski1794]

I think Bush airplanes amazing but I think that they fly only in US, just because I have never seen one of them here in Brazil.😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨

[@AviationFederation]

Bush airplanes are indeed incredible, designed for rugged terrain and remote locations. While they are commonly associated with the United States, their popularity extends beyond its borders. While it may be less common to see them in Brazil, there are enthusiasts and pilots who appreciate the versatility and capabilities of bush planes worldwide. While the specific models and availability may vary by region, the spirit of bush flying and adventure can be enjoyed in various countries around the world.

[@waltersempticowski1794]

@@AviationFederation thanks 4 the feedback

[@bushpilot1074]

Ch 701 4 seat ...... come on ... this video is full of mistake . you talk about canada bush flying ... but you dont have the levitation and pegazair aircraft who are specific desigh in canada for canada .

[@killingfields1424]

Bearhawk

[@SeanTurley-s1f]

these prices are misleading, that's for bare kit no engine or avionics. Add about 50-100k$ for a completed aircraft.

[@DanielMorales-dz4nv]

This kind of bush planes are by far better than girocopters.

[@mikeh7390]

None of these numbers are accurate.

[@jarkom9]

Pure bullshit whole video

[@mojaveclimber]

Hinged from the top,opens from the bottom. Zenith 701 four passengers I doubt it. 200 lbs x4 =800 lbs with a gross weight of 1100 lbs.

[@AviationFederation]

You raise a valid point regarding the passenger capacity of the Zenith 701. The calculation of passenger capacity should take into account the weight limitations and ensure that the aircraft remains within its maximum gross weight and center of gravity limits. Thank you for pointing out our oversight. It's important for pilots and operators to thoroughly understand and adhere to the aircraft's limitations to ensure safe and compliant operations.

[@iaf010]

I think these are prices without engines - because no way these aircraft are these cheap

[@charliehampton2653]

Number one I am number two. Buy me one I like the blue one

[@О.Ш-ь1щ]

superstol has only 1 passenger seat, the other one is for a pilot

[@ВладимирБутенко-х6ч]

MOUL???

[@williamjmansfield8768]

Multiply prices by factor of 5

[@paulkelly2085]

CH-701 only holds pilot and 1 passenger

[@AviationFederation]

You're right; the CH-701 typically accommodates only the pilot and one passenger. Thanks for pointing that out! Are there other aircraft you’re considering for more passenger capacity?

[@speedomars]

A kit plane is not cheap. Kinda tired of these videos alleging such an erroneous contention. To make a full and fair apples-apples comparison of aircraft prices you MUST include the cost of the engine (not included in kits), avionics (not included in kits), and the gorilla in the room, the LABOR to complete the build.

[@AviationFederation]

You raise a valid point. While kit planes may appear to be cheaper than ready-to-fly aircraft at first glance, the additional costs you mentioned, such as the engine and avionics, can add up quickly. Furthermore, building a kit plane requires a significant investment of time and labor, which must also be factored into the total cost. That's precisely why many enthusiasts consider this a labor of love! It's essential to carefully consider all of these factors before making a decision about whether a kit plane is a cost-effective choice for your aviation needs.

[@JRS2248]

Kitfox

[@edcew8236]

Hmm. Designed for Canada? Numbers 1, 2, and 3 are American planes designed for the homebuilder. Hmm.

[@AviationFederation]

You bring up an interesting observation about the nationality and design focus of the aircraft in the list. Indeed, many homebuilt aircraft, including the ones in the list, originate from the United States and cater to the homebuilder community. Design considerations often reflect the needs and preferences of the local aviation culture and regulations. Do you have any thoughts on how aircraft designed for specific regions (especially in North America) might differ in terms of features or suitability for certain missions?

[@AncientApparatus]

I don't know where they are getting there prices from but there's no way ANY plane goes for less than $100K!!!

[@gamer7762]

Супер!!!

[@billhalbert7955]

If you want real value in a bush plane just buy used Maule M-4 or 5. They are powered by real airplane engines, not the snowmobile engine powered airplanes you recommended.

[@robertg9514]

There’s no such thing as cheap and aircraft being used in the same sentence. That will get you kicked off social media for misinformation 😊

[@kellyrobinson1780]

Beginner level powered hang glider? I'm guessing that's gotta be under $2K?

[@charlesspringer4709]

5 Cheapest? Not by a mile. For example, where is the Savannah?

[@LanPiloto]

Al do a savannah is great airplane actually the best ive flown but unfortunately they aren't as popular in the US its mostly the zenith that is similar

[@juemuri5448]

ob es je möglich sein würde, ein kleines flugzeug zu bauen, welches nahezu jeder autofahrer fliegen könnte ?

[@AviationFederation]

Es gibt Experimentalflugzeuge, die Sie ohne Lizenz fliegen können, aber wir empfehlen es nicht.

[@juemuri5448]

@@AviationFederation das war ja nicht meine frage...ich kann mir sogar als laie vorstellen, wie schwierig das umzusetzen wäre...es geht also um die konstruktion eines fliegers, der mit hilfe eines pc und eines fluglaien zu fliegen wäre...ich sehe das ja auch in einem anderen bereich = boote. selbst segeln würde n laie so hinbekommen, dass er wieder nach hause kommt. die konstruktion ist da allerdings schon komplizierter als bei einer motoryacht...aber lieben dank für die antwort.

[@АлександрПушкин-ц1х]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@TheTXRanger]

So much conflicting information in this video it renders it almost useless... Claims the Zenith 701 can accommodate 4 passengers (it cannot under any circumstance) and then 30 seconds later says it seats two (correct)... How does this stuff get online.

[@iamkyeva]

Did i just hear Kenya???

[@paulkelly2085]

Just Aircraft, again 1 pilot & 1 passenger

[@murphyaircraft]

This list is definitely not accurate and independent opinion of the poster. There are other inexpensive kit "bush planes" that should have made this list.

[@donaldconnolly3627]

THAT BARROWS TAKES OFF AS SHORT AS A CHINOOK.....AND YOU GET A REAL PLANE

[@janniemeyer9951]

No STOL distances. Too little info to compare or even give a rating.

[@AviationFederation]

Thanks for highlighting the importance of STOL capabilities. Are there specific aircraft models or features you're particularly interested in regarding STOL performance?

[@Watson1]

You really need to get your facts right before making a statement.

[@LTDan-hu5fq]

The Zenith 701 cannot carry 4 passengers as claimed by robot woman!!!LOL

[@701Builder]

STOL short takeoff or landing. Just say The word. 2 passengers only though.

[@numeric.alphabet]

Surely fly silently indeed..!

[@crazycomboj8061]

इंडिया इस वरी लूगर कंट्री

[@corex72]

Still cheaper than a new hilux.

[@AviationFederation]

Who needs a Hilux when you can take your bush plane to the grocery store? Just imagine the parking space!

[@rubenrodriguez-qq2dv]

No thank you

[@ozarklanding]

701 is a 2 place bird, not 4…

[@AviationFederation]

You're absolutely right, the Zenith CH 701 is a two-seater aircraft known for its versatility and rugged design. Sorry for the oversight! Have you had the chance to fly or work with one of these?

[@ozarklanding]

@@AviationFederation Yes. I’ve flown in one and about to start building mine.

[@robertg9514]

There’s no such thing as cheap and aircraft being used in the same sentence. That will get you kicked off social media for misinformation 😊