Top 5 Most Powerful Rare Santa Battleships Explained | World of Warships

[@yolobart395]

What´s about Lenin ?

[@uravgwargamer3300]

​@@yolobart395 Yeah, missed out. Can easily replace Nelson. Too much tanky and great guns at t8, specially with the accuracy and specical close dispersion with improved 1.7 sigma makes it too much consistent against broadside ships. The armor is very strong against all he spams and with kuznetzov, it really becomes one of the most powerful battleships at t8.

[@wramsey2656]

@@uravgwargamer3300 I have the Lenin and have had a lot of great battles in it. When WG made changes to detectability almost 2 years ago, it really hurt the Russian BB line as their shortened gun range coupled with no spotter planes; in my opinion the ships were nerfed. Detectability increased making it easier to be the first BBs detected in many battles because you have to move in closer to use your guns.

[@dachickenman281]

Number 1 on that list for me would be the Thunderer

[@2012ArsenalMega]

Thunderer has been nurfed, especially AP damage, by decreasing RNG chance for penetration. WG is secretly, for years now, nerfs old ships so people play new ones. And I am not talking about the official nurfs like range or reload time. This company is as fucked up as Battlestate, and guess what is the common denominator...

[@wramsey2656]

Thunderer has no spotter so the reduction in range hurts her. I got her back in 2017-18 i believe and she makes a lot of players on the other side really mad. Its part of the strategy when u play that ship is to burn BBs down and zap cruisers. Her galley is great as they serve the british Beef Wellington which is hard to beat 😀. I also have Georgia and i sure make a lot of players mad (not on purpose), she is just so strong!! Great Video!!!!! I will have to try and get the Nelson. I have the T7 Duke of York and i rarely use AP as the HE shells have a 41% fire chance so i burn down many ships. It has hydro which really helps avoid torps.

[@dethhetz]

I used to be in collectors club when GC was rolled out and it was given to collectors to test before release. It's when it had 1.5 sigma and about 130m dispersion. Holy cow it was a hell of machine, best experience I personally had in wows, but Im glad it was nerfed eventually. Even in current state WG was considering to just lift it to tier 6, imagine what a beast it was before nerf.

[@world_of_scrapyard]

Bro is sitting in a HUGE cave, battleing with ships

[@oneangrycanadian6205]

I got the Cesar about two months ago out of a dropped super container lol. I was like holy shit look what I got lmao!!!

[@AllroundSwizzy]

I’m about to sell a Karambit Marble Fade and spend the earnings on containers. Hoping for a Smaland

[@Schorch1962]

From this list i have Thunderer, Georgia and Nelson. HE-spam don`t win you games, but the AP of this battleships is really strong and win games. Nelson has so strong AP that i change to HE when i know there will be a cruiser like Atlanta, Flint or Fiji coming out with the broadside to me, AP just overpens those light cruisers. But with HE, Nelson makes them a oneshot with many citadal hits. But most times, AP is the game winner. Musashi is a ship i never wanted because it`s just unfair, a real cheat to other players. Giulio Cesare has a very weak spot: her broadside! As i played more tier 4 with Myogi, Wyoming and Imperator Nikolai I, i was happy to see one ot those 3 GC noob divisions in the opponent team, showing broadside to use all their guns. Even with Myogi after the dispersion buff, they were great oneshots for me. I never got this ship, but as Wargaming wanted to uptier her on tier 6, i was against it. I don`t wanted to lose my happy tier 4 BB oneshots 😂 and honestly, my Fuso can shred a GC so easy, no chance for the "pizza boat". In skilled hands, GC is a might and great opponent.

[@LavfaBonisanto]

Not me getting the f**king Picardie 💀💀💀

[@snoke5567]

I got småland and after playing it I feel like it should be on this list

[@uravgwargamer3300]

@@snoke5567 This a battleship list. I have already featured another top 5 ships in which smaland is one of the best ships.

[@snoke5567]

​@@uravgwargamer3300 Lmao I'm just stupid and didn't read the title.

[@uravgwargamer3300]

@@snoke5567 hey man, you are very honorable viewer to me, your comment means alot. 🥰

[@DevinDavis-so8cn]

i bought 20 more cont and got a t8 and t7 i'm done what a ripoff

[@enforcerx9924]

the more ships u have the higher the chance of getting better ships

[@6uiti]

Missouri/Belfast the only ships I bought , look at it's state now. Basically useless and that makes it credit farming irrelevant(also got a hard nerf). I still hate wargaming for this and my wallet is staying closed. Mo needs buffs for sure

[@uravgwargamer3300]

@@6uiti yeah mo, is unfortunately got powercrept alot now.

[@dartharagon9129]

Well either you are just a bad player or you play the ship wrong. Iowa and Missouri are still very good ships, super accurate 406, very good survivability and missouri can even handle herself against DDs with the radar. Missouri has a 53.5% winrate, one of the highest on T9, higher than Jean Bart or Georgia and only loosing to Musashi, which is basically just overpowered.

[@6uiti]

@@dartharagon9129 yet iowa is 4th from bottom , and rhode island exists. i have good winrate in missouri , but its been a stuggle with her in randoms .

[@6uiti]

@@dartharagon9129 there is a reason u dont see many of them in randoms

[@dartharagon9129]

@@6uiti iowa is 4th from the bottom because it is a tech tree ship. Every ship in the 3 big tech trees (germany, Japan and USA) has an incredibly bad winrate just because the people that play it are New players and quite incompetent. Yamato has a 48% winrate while being one of the best t10 ships, while Shikishima, basically the same ship just played by more competent people has a 52% winrate. And you see Missouri VERY often in Randoms, even now that it basically is out of the game for 5 years. Iowa has the second most games played and Missouri the 5th most games played in T9 BBs