Top 5 Pathfinder Wishlist for 2025

[@greg4051]

I would absolutely love to see a Shifter class. Thanks to growing up on the Animorphs books it’s my number 1 power fantasy and there’s more than enough juice in the concept to build a whole class around

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Yeah, After I made that Ballister Boldheart video, people were asking for a Nimona vid and I was just like "Needs the Shifter Class."

[@HenshinFanatic]

I'm guessing it'll be either a Druid class archetype that makes it more Monk-y, or a Monk class archetype that adds shapeshifting.

[@natanoj16]

There is an amazing 3rd party Shifter 2e class which I really enjoy in "Frontiers of Magic" it functions through a new version of 'stances' and is a 'Stance Dancer' which does a bunch of cool Out of combat transformations as well

[@natanoj16]

@@HenshinFanatic I don't think Shifter could be a Class Archetype. I think it needs to get the full Kineticist treatment of a Unique non-spell user :)

[@klepikovmd]

We have Werecreature archetype and beast barbarian

[@squidrecluse2336]

5:14 Just to clear up a common misconception, the Avenger class archetype is not a stand in for the Slayer class. It's the same iconic character, but that's for lore reasons not mechanics. Other than some base Rogue features they share, the archetype has very little to do with the old P1e class, both thematically and mechanically. I do like the Shifter, but I kind of feel there was a reason it was the last P1e class. A nature themed were-martial is a cool idea, but an idea that can only go so far. If it does become a full class, I'd like to see it go beyond just nature themed transformations. Like an angelic or fiendish divine form, or a He-Man/Power Rangers/Sailor Moon magical transformation, or for occult you can go full Ben 10 with a bunch of weird alien stuff. I think that would merit a full class.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Quote from Paizo directly: "This class archetype for the rogue was inspired by the iconic of a Pathfinder First Edition class, the slayer." So maybe not the same, but 'inspired by.' paizo.com/community/blog/v5748dyo6wmp0?War-of-Immortals-Old-Friends-and-New-Faces

[@kurothewanderer]

I feel that Shifter will be absorbed into Starfinder 2e Evolutionist as the primal aspect for that class when it comes out.

[@Ditidos]

I hope they don't base the evolutionist subclasses on the magical traditions, though. The 1e version was already too magical for my tastes.

[@TheLocalDisasterTourGuide]

I have the rough outline of a Cleric Doctrine I wish they'd do. I call it the Apostle & it's the Skill Cleric. It focuses on the idea of a Cleric traveling beyond the normal reach of their church, so they have to have some skills to operate without regular support.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Oh, that’s a good idea.

[@hellfrozenphoenix13]

A skill junkie option is a neat idea. Maybe as a bonus of the Doctrine, Wisdom bow increases languages known and skills known, in place of Int

[@kaiserinjacky]

hearing DC be called "detective comics" did 6d6 mental damage to me on a basic will save

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Figures I’d spell it out, as DC means something different in this community.

[@ArakkoaChronicles]

@@PsiPrimeProductions1 It's just funny, you never hear Detective Comics. It's either DC, or DC Comics (which yes, it's redundant, but I heard somewhere that's actually the official name?)

[@kadmii]

love the Wild Kratts mention, would be a really cool option

[@Iceblade269]

Would love an Arcanist Archetype for Wizard, Kensai for a monk, a conjurer archtype for summoner, or an arcane trickster rogue class archetype that makes you a caster with sneak attack. Absolutely agree on the NPC rules. The Gallery is my hype for this year from Paizo. I’m really hoping for a guide on adding class feats to monsters to spice up creation, or more tips on making nocs based upon PC classes. Also would like to see some more mythic statblocks

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

So you can KINDA do arcanist with spell substitution. Maybe grab which dedication to add some more feats. It’s not the same, but it’s kinda close. Kondai you can likewise do. Monastic weaponry lets you monk with any finesse weapons you have familiarity with, so gain familiarity with the elven curved blade or rapier or whatever and you are good. I think the eldrich trickster (pre remaster) can sneak attack with attack spells. And the standard rules for NPC creation let you add ‘relevant feats and abilities’ to an NPC. So just make an NPC fighter and reflavor it as a monster. Not perfect, but I hope it helps.

[@HenshinFanatic]

@@PsiPrimeProductions1 Nah, Arcanist is straight up the Spell Flexibility class archetype for prepared casters (except Magus) applied to a Wizard.

[@gamesandstuff127]

That is a great list. I love the call out for the Sohei! I would like to see more Inventor Innovations and more love for Reload weapons in general. I guess I would love to see a Techmage, which existed in PF1e. And I would love to see more exotic weapons, especially 'mundane' elemental ones. After all, in a world in which people without magic can craft lightning and acid bombs, it should be a stretch to see weapons that shoot Lightning instead of bullets. Nothing magic, but maybe rare level 1 weapons firearms.

[@yashametlaudna]

I'd honestly love a Shifter for pf2e- one of the things I remember really fondly from 5e was the fact that in my first ever campaign, the Druid would always transform into a Cat like once a session just for fun, and while I understand WHY the pf2e Druid doesn't have capabilities like that, I do sort of miss it and have been sort of yearning to see more classes/options that let you consistently shapeshift. I also think there's just a TON of potential to be had with a pure martial shape changer. Brawler would also be a REALLY nice archetype, but personally I also wouldn't mind it as a class in of itself, as I'd really like to see more classes that are fully focused on unarmed combat.

[@kaiserinjacky]

honestly i 100% agree on the shifter idea. bring it back! i've made a homebrew class called the alterant which is similar but notably different in the fact that the changes you pick up are permanent, not temporary changes. i'd love to see a proper shifter brought to second edition, though

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

It’d be pretty easy to do. Just have stances that they could get into that change their bodies. You could even make it a monk class archetype.

[@hellfrozenphoenix13]

Id like class archetypes as well, maybe even a "Fused Class" where its archetypes that focus on being accessible by 2 classes and then fusing them by giving them half of what the other offers. Bullet Dancer being reqorked into one of those to fuse Gunslinger and Monk would be one cool idea. I also would love to see more daring ventures. If Shifter doesnt make it as a full class, then id suggest making a Class archetype for Summoner, where the theme is they embody the Eidolon isntead of summoning it, becoming half of that Eidolon and accessing new abilities as a result. Or a Psionic Warrior as as a fighter/Psychic archetype, giving some bound Occult casting and giving a way to put "Amps" onto martial actions as well. Just a lot of cool potential and the odd ideas is what i love most about Paizo

[@AndrewFullerton-vo3wp]

I have found a Fighter base with aspects of Ranger makes a good Samurai. After all, depending on how you see a Samurai, they could be the stereotypical Daikyu wielder, or specializes with the Great Bow or the real Samurai who focused with the Naginata and not the Katana.

[@WILDMUTTDude]

For the new Fighter archetypes, maybe the "Battlecry" book that is going to have the new Commander and Guardian classes is the place to show them. Hopefully because I want them too!

[@christopherg2347]

My thoughts: 2:07 I think you forgot about Dawnsbury Days. The maps do make a random generation feasible, similar to some mods for the Shadowrun games from Harebrained Studios. 2:41 My GM just allowed me to use Slings in Gunslinger. A Sling Slinger. But the Exemplar has some reload Epitaph, so I might be a good basis too. 4:13 I think Oozes just have -10 AC, but I can't figure out simple rules for Swarms and Troops. 7:09 A SF2 version of the Evolutionist might do it. But a Monk Archetype similar to the Five Breaths Vanguard could also work.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Yeah, Dawnsbury Days . . . I mean, I'd like a game that randomly generates whole dungeon floors that have keys that you need to find or simple puzzles you need to solve, and as good as Dawnsbury Days is (and it's very good fur such a small, non-professional team) I don't see them doing that. As for exemplar slingers, yeah a few have mentioned them. I'm kinda turned off from exemplars by how easy it is to break the game with them. Plus there is only like, ONE weapon that works with sling for exemplar.

[@sghctoma]

@@PsiPrimeProductions1 There's a WIP roguelike mod for the Dawnsbury Days beta branch. I have not tried it, don't know how good it is, just letting you know it exists.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

@@sghctoma Oh wow. I didn't think the engine would support that. Thanks for letting me know. I'll have to check it out.

[@valvadis2360]

First. It's interesting i love the idea of a Sling Archetype, more weapon styles should have dedicated archetypes like Archer, but i don't feel the same way about it in Gunslinger. Maybe it's because even the "crossbow-gunslinger" bit looks a little weird to me.

[@gamesandstuff127]

It could be a level 1 Gunslinger Feat. All it says is "Treat Slings as Crossbows for all purposes"

[@dragon11742]

There are 3 things I want to see most. The first is a viable dragon race (obviously). I know they're already working on it, but I'm still not confident they aren't going to mess it up. What I want isn't an overpowered dragon, but rather a dragon you could customize to your class/party role. For instance, having a breath attack that stacks with your spellcasting abilities would be nice or natural armor you could grow to be as strong as plate armor after enough time or through monetary sacrifices to your ancestors or something. I could imagine each of a dragons attributes as a racial feat you have to take at first level to get the most out of it. The second thing i want to see is an update for magus and thaumaturge. I think magus could use a major rework to make it more beginner friendly, and the thaumaturge is probably fine as is, but it could maybe use some clarification such as how lore skill feats work with exploit vulnerability. Thirdly, I hope any class that isn't in player core 1 or 2 gets updated and added to another class book, as well as more racial and class feats and subclasses like you mention to go with them. I hope everyone gets to see more of what they want in pathfinder in one way or another this year, but these are the things I want the most.

[@Iceblade269]

Battlezoo Bestiary has playable dragons. 3pp, bit it’s top quality

[@BotchFrivarg]

Although the shifter as presented here is pretty cool and can see how a lot of players would want that I personally would also love to see a class where you only have one distinct other form, a bit like Barbarian Rage or werecreature archetype, but with different drawbacks/benefits (and not a rare archetype so you could do it from lvl1), specifically things like having the other form giving you benefits outside of combat (that are different from your base form), and having shifting between forms be an action coming up in combat at least semi-regular. If I would build this myself I would probably base it on something like a cross between a barbarian and a summoner.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

So . . . you can kinda do that with the warecreature archetype. It gives you a hybrid and full creature form, and would work well with something like an animal barbarian.

[@BotchFrivarg]

@@PsiPrimeProductions1 that would be close but not exactly it, for one the werecreature archetype is rare, another AFAICT it doesn't really allow for strategic use of the difference in form during combat (you just rage and shift to hybrid and try to stay there), and on top of that limited use in exploration mode. It is a very specific fantasy that is hard to explain, but currently there are a lot of options that come very close (meld together from the summoner is the other one I can think of right now) but none really match. And not saying a perfect match is needed (to be honest I would be perfectly happy playing a werecreature archetype animal barb, a summoner, or another close option), but if I could make a whish a reality I would like a class for that specific fantasy.

[@egonhomes]

I'm a huge fan of #5. I don't necessarily want 4 level 17 feats, as that would be adding a lot of feats, but just some rebalancing of ancestries. I know it's thematic, but the number of ancestries with +Dex/Cha and -Con are insane. Also, there are only a few +Str ancestries out there. I know we can use the alternate stat boosts as a core rule instead of a variant now, but I like the core stat mods of the races. I'd like to see a rebalancing of feats, so the Gnome, Halfling, Human, etc don't get all the attention. The Custom Mixed Heritage rule goes a long way to fixing this, but some ancestries just seem to have the short end of the stick in feats, both in number and in efficacy. Another change that might be nice is incorporating some of the 5e rules into the Wizard. Their choice of spells is based of 3.5e, and we've moved past those limitations. This change would be to have them choose a selection of spells memorized instead of filling each spell slot. 5e wizards are broken because of their spells, not their class mechanics.

[@Ditidos]

I really want rules to swap out the type of spellcasting a class has. I want a spontenous wizard and a prepared bard. Hopefully not a class archetype, just an optional rule. That said, I hope the shifter is not about partial transformation if it gets done, I feel like between the animal barbarian, the ranger focus spell and the werecreature archetype that's easy to do. But I really want a class that can easily go as big as possible all the time but also use unarmed attacks, not give them, just be compatible with it. A strength skill class that works with unarmed attacks would also be great, as well as a wisdom-based skill class or a wisdom class that's academic in nature rather than faith based.

[@shadestemple]

Feel like Swarm guidelines are basically covered but troop would be nice. Otherwise I find the creation rules pretty robust to guide me to most build ideas I have had. Though as they release new classes I would like a block for NPC roadmap like we have the otherones. Maybe the Remaster Guns and Gears might have that *crosses fingers*

[@FelixYyz]

One thing I'd like to see is more classes getting access to sanctification. Right off the top of my head, I'd say monks, sorcerers, and maybe witches. Could all use some way to get holy/ unholy without multiclassing into cleric or Champion.

[@KOkami03]

Another approach for the Shifter could be using the Barbarian's Beast Instinct as a basis.

[@ShaleLee]

Yes Shifter! Always loved shapeshifting characters, but Druid has always felt... Well it's not my class. I'd love a martial shapeshifting class.

[@palkemo]

I disagree on the troop point, I think there´s enough information on the troop trait and troop defefenses explanation at the end of some books (Fury of Elements comes to mind) to homebrew troop monsters. Yet I concede Both entries should had been included on the new Masters Core on the creature creation section as an adition to the old rules.

[@seangrant8871]

I see all these fantastic, mechanic heavy options and raise you a narrative one (with a lot of potential subclasses): The Casmaron World Guild. Casmaron's lore is pretty damn dated, and it could use the massive sprucing up we saw of places like M'Wangi and Tian Xia. Getting a number of West and Central Asian authors in on this would be a huge boon.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Oh yeah, I've been wanting a Casmaron sourcebook for a while, there's almost nothing on it. However, most of these options were for things that could apply to any Pathfinder games, not just ones in Golarion. But yeah, a Casmeron sourcebook would be awesome. No idea why they haven't explored it.

[@Ershiin]

I would love an archetype that centers around the skillmonkey concept that isnt just the rogue/investigator multiclass. Also a mobility focused archetype would be great. I hate having to shop around weird archetypes and sign up for random factions or whatnot just to get an extra 10ft of movement. Gimme a 1 stop shop for going fast, climbing, swimming, jumping, and maybe even eventual flying and/or teleporting. Anything that helps cover the more basic gameplay elements, really. I want more stuff like the Archer, Mauler, Healer, and Bastion. Less stuff that is so heavily tied to factions, regions, or otherwise too lore specific to really be viable for most games. More skill feats would be nice too. Some skills are quite starved for feats that make them worthwhile. Also if Performance could be given an actual purpose outside of being "the bard skill", that would be greaaaaaaaaat.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

The Archaeologist archetype is pretty skill heavy. Gets you 2 skills to expert, some utility spells, bonus additional lore feats. Scout can give you additional move speed. Werecreature can get you a swim or fly speed. Just a few options. I know they may not be ideal.

[@Ershiin]

@@PsiPrimeProductions1 Yeah but thats exactly what i mean with having to shop around. I would like something dedicated, like how you have the Archer dedicated to Archery or Medicine dedicated to the Medicine skill. I would like an Athlete equivalent to the Acrobat dedication, etc etc.

[@ML-zv6tr]

My top 5 1. More Magus. We have Magus+ content, but I definitely prefer 1st Party content as it's more readily accepted. 2. Persistent Damage Support; Let me make characters who get benefits when they are suffering persistent damage, let me trigger in new ways/aggravate persistent damage without needing to let enemies have full turns before dying. Let me scent blood or burning, let me frighten enemies suffering mental damage, let lightning damage befuddle and cold damage make them clumsy etc. 3. Incarnum (from 3.5e) influenced class designs in a new playtest. Could be arguably more magitech influenced than I'd like in my typical fantasy, but the core concept was that you would have a number of daily "shaped" binds which you could almost freely invest a resource in. It supports learning about the world and the type of adventures you'd be getting into, shaping the appropriate bind for that day, and then switching your investments so you can effectively contribute. I could see this being an appopriate flavour for a Shifter class, honestly without being relegated to Wild Shaped Fighter. 4. Summoner v2. I hate the PF2E Summoner. I hate that it's little more than a Pet Class with extra steps. I miss the actual act of Summoning being relevant to a Summoner. I get that it's bad action econ, but that should be something the class should be able to improve on. Also, I dislike that it takes feats are the only way to customize the summon. 5. i've said enough!

[@HenshinFanatic]

An Incarnum inspired class design could be a decent way to make the Shifter it's own class. What I want though, is something inspired by Tome of Battle: Book of Nine Swords. There were third party products inspired by that design in PF1E, but as yet nothing for PF2E.

[@Kokszo]

Given how they're decoupling magical flavourings now I think we could see Shifter being a wave-casting druid class archetype. As long as they don't go with such asinine choices like with Battle Harbinger (not even the aura font but Reactive Strike as a feature at 9 instead of the doctrine spells????) I think it could work if it got some support for doing stuff in wildform other than striking with a bland statstick. Maybe incorporate some of the Wild Mimic abilities into it (the copy part, not exaclty having to use up even more feats for them) Honestly fighter should only get sidegrades like warrior of legend and on that power-level, who still added feats that are plain out stronger than preexisting version (while it does require a specific weapon groups it also lacks flourish so it combos nice with reach those groups usually have for a lot of combat mobility dancing around enemy reach). The class is already choking others by constraining their power budgets with their "soft" subclasses having to least hoops to jump through to be effective. I could also argue that, already, a pugilist/brawler already exists with unarmed fighter with martial artist archetype. Ninja and Samurai while I wish would be in I don't think paizo wants japanese-centric orientalism otherwise surely we'd get something in TX character guide. Since their focus on CAs supposedly increased I'd wish they'd revisit Synthesist beyond bad meld into eidolon.

[@townsendwright3999]

All the way back when I was just getting into PF2e, after deciding I liked how it handled shapeshifting/wildshape better than 5e, I was trying to figure out how I could finagle Fighter with the Druid archetype to be a shapechanging martial. Slings are cool, personally I'm looking for a way to make a Harpoon viable. I wanna 'poon some stuff.

[@time2dice]

I absolutely agree with the more ancestry feats. I’m so tired of putting heroic presence on all my humans!

[@spiritB0mber]

I am hoping and praying that once Starfinder 2e is properly released there will be a slew of Numerian content following. I want to know whats up wit the remains of the technic league, tech rules for pathfinder and maybe even an ap that has us heavily invested in this sci-fantasy mash up like Iron Gods. Also LO shining kingdoms got leaked so a lost omens book thats focused on cheliax would be great too!

[@troll5262]

Martial flavored class similar to Kineticist. Instead of being 'caster spell' like effects with elements. I want something that does martial like effects with elements. And I mean fully on Martial, not just as a 'you technically can' as it is with Kineticist now. I want something that plays similar to a Fighter or Barbarian or such, but it's elemental/magical effects for the attacks and maneuvers instead of using swords or whatever. Also some kind of eidolon merging class(or subclass for Summoner) where you merge yourself with your thing and that's your entire thing. It existed in pf1e or dnd 3.5 but I've forgotten the name. It was such an awesome concept where you essentially had this awesome battle transformation and form. But you were very vulnerable outside of it.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

So I think a shifter could be that 'martial kineticist; you wanted. As for Merge with Eidolon, there is a feat for that. I think it's called 'meld with eidolon.' A class archetype centered around that might be cool.

[@troll5262]

​@@PsiPrimeProductions1 While the shifter would be a similar thing, it'd be more of a 'transform body part then do physical attacks'. I was thinking more in the line of using magic(al) effects. Some (top of the head and not to be taken too literal) examples; Flame Lash: Lets the user do a melee strike against a creature within 15 feet. On a hit it can pull the target towards the user. Blast Kick: Charge magic in a leg then do a melee strike against a creature or object within reach(of unarmed attack). If the target is an object it does bonus damage. Shielding Gust: Reaction taken when an enemy uses a ranged attack against the user that has a physical projectile. Give the user an AC bonus from ranged attacks until the end of the current turn. Stuff like that. Which when I try to explain people will just say 'that's just Kineticist', but to me it really isn't. Kineticist is a funky caster first and foremost. Before we knew more about it for pf2e I thought it'd be like a 'magical martial'. Not a gish(i.e martial with traditional spells), but a class that behaves like a martial with magical effects. And as it sadly wasn't. My want for such a class remains unfulfilled. As for the eidolon merge thing, I know that's a thing, but it's awful in pf2e and really more of a utility thing IF your eidolon has a movement you don't or is tiny so you can 'hitch a ride'. I'm talking 'hop into the "magical mech" and start blasting' kinda thing instead.

[@CrimsonXenoProduct]

you kinda brought it up, I want a starfinder crpg

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

I mean, that's what the Dragon's Demand game is. I know some people don't like the Miniatures aesthetic, but it is a PF2 CRPG.

[@artpaul8909]

As a gm I would love a tool or set of rules for modifying and creating my own monsters. I love the idea of specialist monsters like different giants or my own dragons. Also giving my monsters class levels. I want to have my monsters stay relevant as the characters level.

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Again, that's kinda-sorta doable. The GM core has rules for creating monsters. And there's nothing stopping you from creating a fighter and just making it large or huge sized and calling it a giant. There's just a few corner cases that they don't cover.

[@ferrisffalcis]

the fighter subclass is the weapon specialization, they just added a bunch of spear feats for fighters, and i expect more feats based on specific weapons also the shifter is just an animal barbarian. straight up

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

So, yes, but also, having cool psychic powers or whatnot wouldn't go amiss. Plus fighters don't get good with their chosen weapons until level 5, so It'd be nice to have something lower level. Also, Animal barbarians in general can't fly, or turn into small animals, or speak Druidic (now Wildsong), Or do their thing without getting so mad they have an anyarism. I think the shifter is different enough to warrant their own thing.

[@Jermbot15]

I have long desired to play a halfling fighter who dual wields a short sword and sling.

[@mineflameblade8788]

I have my own 2025 wishlist. 1. Armiger fighter/Hellknight returning as a fighter archetype. (I think Hellknight being a martial crowd controler with each major order bringing something unique like Scourge having the ability to infiltrate better due to their knowledge of laws) 2. Evolutionist in Starfinder 2e keeping the mythic path niches. For the love of god Paizo. Please don't be a killjoy and remove the Celestial niche in 2e. Or the one that turns you into a litch. 3. Fix the levels 1-2 experience. People have been complaining about that level being steeped in osr bs and I think its time we move away from it. 4. Paizo expanding on Zon-Sheylin's lore in Starfinder 2e. In particular. How the Prismatic ray is effected since Sheylin was a big part of that pantheon. 5. I hope the companions in Dragons Demand are going to be good. Especially since they will make or break a crpg for me. (For example. I was turned off of Fe Fates because the characters were rehases or boring. But Owlcat has excellent companions like , Ember, Ableard, Jae, Pascal, and my 2 favorites. Arueshalae and Regil Derenge. )

[@davidriggs538]

When is Starfinder 2e getting the Mechanic and Technomancer classes (playtest or otherwise)?

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Sometime 'early this year' for the playtest, according to gencon I think. But that might be delayed unil after the Impossible playtest is done.

[@Battlefieldfan146]

I DESPERATELY want a "golf bag" fighter archetype, someone who can swap weapons quickly and maybe share runes and such between them

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Hmmm. Making a fighter good at all weapon types (as opposed to just one) would just make them straight up better than other fighters, so there would have to be a pretty big downside to compensate. If you want to 'share runes,' you can kind of get that effect by just playing with automatic bonus progression. Also 'Golf Bag fighter' makes me think of Casey Jones from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

[@saeedrazavi4428]

Honestly I think the shifter could be achieved somewhat by giving the Untamed druid the battle harbinger treatment. It's a shame they didn't go ahead and do that in Howl of the Wild

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Given the negative reaction to the battle harbinger, I think there would be a riot if that happened.

[@RPCauldron]

my nr. 1 wish for PF2e in 2025 would be a party of 4 players to play at a physical table and who are not scared by sums of numbers or prejudiced against the best game out here just because it's out of their comfort zone T_T

[@wolffrdu6463]

hoooooo, shifter, i like them

[@Monstercloud9]

Never wish for anything. I wanted an Inquisitor, and we got the garbage that is the Vindicator. Monkey paw is real.

[@RufusEggers]

Runelord Class Archetype!!! NOW!

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

They've already released that the archetype will released in the upcoming book rival Academies, slated for release in march 2025

[@SteveMichael]

This is a crazy wish, but I wish that someone would buy Paizo and fire all the cult members inside the company and have the company just focus on creating a great game. I know this isn't going to happen, but one can wish.

[@PhoenixBladeInfinty]

No ding??

[@PsiPrimeProductions1]

Yeah, I'm not on instagram anymore, and I'm trying to move off of twitter.

[@ingenparks]

Thanks for scrapping the ringing at the beginning. Much more likely to watch your videos now, it was just annoying.

[@mobi2289]

I wish paizo would buff the remastered Oracle. They absolutely butchered life oracle. It's worse than a cleric in every possible way now. Heals less often, for lower amounts, and takes a massive hit to healing itself. It's objectively worse in every regard and has absolutely garbage feats. It went from arguably the best healer to objectively one of if not the worst classes in the game. Don't know why paizo was so stingy on the oracle remaster and gave it basically nothing to make up for the giant nerfs.

[@johnharrison2086]

Just play the original and ignore the Remaster

[@MizakiFelix]

You lost me the moment you used the word meta in regards to a role-playing game