Top 50 Best Eurovision Songs by Percentage of Available Points (1957-2016)

[@AlexESC]

Here's a link to an updated video after the ESC 2017. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGmlf2CvrJmXbaM

[@mattiassollerman]

Your calculations must be wrong since the result: - does not align with my personal and highly sophisticated taste in music. - does not confirm my over inflated national pride. - does not take into account... the orbital angle of Saturn or sumthing. Just kidding. :) Great work. I've been searching for such a list. Two thumbs up.

[@CasperLind1]

i belivie you're serious

[@Thrna_1]

Almost thought this was serious until I read the second point XD

[@flaekon]

Absolutely brilliant. I am so tired of "Best ESC songs everrrr" lists, where most (if not all) of the songs are from the past 10-15 years. Sometimes they throw in Abba and Logan. I love this objective statistics approach. :)

[@liljakaren97]

more like songs only from the 2010s hahah, i see that a lot

[@yg94004]

29-28-27 The most radical transitions in history...

[@ufuksnmez98]

YG94004 how

[@yg94004]

Because the Eurovision has changed its popular genres during the years, so a mix video of those genres causes a mixed feelings. Take a look at 4:56 . It's felt mostly at this point

[@AlwaysRM_]

LUXEMBURG PLEASE COME BACK! WE MISS YOU LITTLE BROTHER!

[@Cardinal_Smith]

Fantastic method, brilliant list and very interesting!

[@hubtop5415]

I agree, the method is a good way of determining the "best" Eurovision song, however it's flawed in my opinion. While I think this method is a very good way of determining just how successful a song was, there is a problem that lies in #1 on this list - Tu Te Reconnaitrais by Anne-Marie David scored 129 out of a possible 160 points. However, prior to 1975, the scoring system was different. The country that came in 1st by voters was given 10 points, then 2nd was given 9, then 3rd was given 8. Because of this, there were several instances where Luxembourg's entry came second in voting, but only missed out on 1 point, rather than 2. Because of this, it was able to accumulate more 'available' points. If 1973 had incorporated the 12-10-8 system of scoring, then Tu Te Reconnaitras would have scored 138 out of a possible 192 points, which equates to 71.86%, which would've put it at 16th on this list. That being said, the UK's 1976 entry of Save Your Kisses For Me was subject to the 12-10-8 scoring, so in my opinion, this would be a more accurate number one.

[@eurodara]

Hub Top 5 well, because this list probably should be made only with entries since 1975

[@angelinak.4868]

To me the percentage of votes doesn't mean a thing, since it can be high not because the song was actually so amazing, but because it was the only good song in that year's competition and was an obvious winner as a result.

[@eurodara]

Angelina K. but still it's better than using actual results when there were less countries competing

[@hubtop5415]

This is a very good point actually. Let's say there were 2 FANTASTIC songs fighting for the top spot, and they got near-equal points, then that would mean they'd both get a lower % of potential points than what they would get in a contest with no competition, and so that's another flaw with this method. Thank you for bringing that to my attention.

[@hideinmysuitcase7803]

Wow! What a great job you've done! Thanks!

[@ingerolsen4471]

There is a mistake concerning Italy 1964 at 4:44. Like in 1965 and 1966, each jury could award all its 9 points to one country. With 15 other countries taking part, the maximum available was 135 points, not 75. Italy scored 36,2963 % of the potential maximum.

[@Nymphaea]

Still irritated over 2015 where Sweden won on the juries vote but Italy won the peoples vote and only scored third place..

[@malingoodiwn9810]

What can you say, Sweden had a good song.

[@maartenplug3871]

Fantastic vid, this is a REAL list!

[@pdinhnha]

there are some great classics and great effort for making this video :3

[@johnkyneur259]

It is a great list, Alex. I enjoyed watching this and especially seeing Anne Marie David up front on the list jk

[@adi0253]

Thank you from France :)

[@anhkhoatranngoc9706]

I saw Il Volo, I click

[@JVFNAF]

Heroes and Fairytale♥♥♥

[@williambillemeyling5647]

Much better method than the other videos

[@EscMike]

Amazing and interesting video !

[@josemadrigalsuarez6828]

I love Massiel, Spain, 1968.

[@el7829]

Thank you for a fair list finally impossible to find one with Ireland actually mentioned 😂

[@MrGabillo]

Everybody talking about scores, but everybody singing Euphoria!!

[@danielwillforss9823]

How does the 2nd place get 60%+ of the votes?

[@adrianantonio9899]

Daniel Willforss It is not 60% of the total vote but 60% of the votes they can get. So let us say that you can get 100 points. If you get 60 points that would be 60%. Kind of complex but once you realize that it is a bit more simple.

[@malcolmsepulchre7713]

Do you know what it is that caps the number of points a certain country can get?

[@jolaytango5303]

I dont get it, should not every country be able to get the same amount of points? So how can a song be second or third place with over 60% of "100" points?

[@adrianantonio9899]

All the countries participating have a chance to get 100% of the vote. Again going back to my example if the total possible score a country can get is a 100, the song can get 100% of the vote by getting all the points. Another song could get 90% of the total points possible by getting 90 points.

[@geminix365]

Adrian Antonio so if a country gets 90% of the votes, there are only 10% left...

[@WantedSandvich]

Great video :)

[@hubtop5415]

While I think this method is a very good way of determining just how successful a song was, there is a problem that lies in #1 on this list - Tu Te Reconnaitrais by Anne-Marie David scored 129 out of a possible 160 points. However, prior to 1975, the scoring system was different. The country that came in 1st by voters was given 10 points, then 2nd was given 9, then 3rd was given 8. Because of this, there were several instances where Luxembourg's entry came second in voting, but only missed out on 1 point, rather than 2. Because of this, it was able to accumulate more 'available' points. If 1973 had incorporated the 12-10-8 system of scoring, then Tu Te Reconnaitras would have scored 138 out of a possible 192 points, which equates to 71.86%, which would've put it at 16th on this list. That being said, the UK's 1976 entry of Save Your Kisses For Me was subject to the 12-10-8 scoring, so in my opinion, this would be a more accurate number one. Still, great video and good insight! Thanks for your work :)

[@JVFNAF]

Eimear Quinn won the Eurovision ? I knew her song but I didn't know that. I didn't know Ding-a-dong was a Eurovision song either. I always shed flows of tears when I listen to Il Volo. They rock. So do Lordi obviously. But my fav remains Mans Zelmerlow with "Heroes".

[@oh_itsDTheo]

I wanted to do this but I was too lazy. I'm glad somebody else did it. :'D

[@giovanniscg8540]

Happy that Sweden is not first as always :-)

[@daenerystargaryen1440]

Ireland still have more wins in total than Sweden :) Ireland has 8 and Sweden 6

[@giovanniscg8540]

+Daenerys Targaryen ireland won 7 times,not 8 :P

[@daenerystargaryen1440]

europeangirl Nah, the Starks are to blame for the death of my House!!

[@malvinanygren]

Antonio Adessi thank you! Sweden is not always the best the most pepole think that, i think (I'm from Sweden)

[@alexappsapp1332]

ireland havn't won in like 20 years, sweden has won 2 times the last 5 years and gotten top 5 very often, we are getting there soon ireland!

[@ididntwanta2partname424]

This is the correct way to calculate the best song because some years there were more points available than others.

[@treestomped6954]

Also note that UK 1976 is the actual one with the most (1971-73 had a voting system that would make sure that you will get at least 34 points or 18.888% (1971-72) or 20% (1973))

[@eurodara]

Treestomped no wonder that it is the biggest selling Eurovision single ever

[@BienkowskiDK]

Olsen Brothers!! 🇩🇰✌🏼

[@4_qu]

WE CAME 2ND OMG UK YOUR GOOD.....well you were good uk

[@nadirg6055]

lol that old spanish flag shelter😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@adrivaliente]

I'm really upset with that. Disrespectful.

[@machiel-smit]

This was the official Spanish flag from 1945-1977. So also the correct Spanish flags in 1971 and 1973.

[@adrivaliente]

I know but it's completely meaningless to put it there.

[@AlexESC]

Wouldn't be the modern flag pointless here? The meaning is that the artists represented Spain under this exact flag when the modern one wasn't officially in use. Some countries which participated in the Eurovision don't even exist anymore and of course their old flags are in use for them. For example, there is Serbia and Montenegro as one country in the video. If there was Yugoslavia, I would have chosen its flag. This principle is used in WIkipedia. Same goes for the Olympics, by the way. I know what this flag means but still.

[@adrivaliente]

it is not the same, at least for me... but let's not make a big world out of it, that's it.

[@brbra10]

You should change the flag for the Spanish songs. That's not the official flag from Spain. It's from the dictatorship.

[@gringapuerca8345]

but that's the flag used in the time the song was sung so i think it's historically accurate

[@plainvanilla7901]

Thanks for making this list, ice really enjoyed it! I have some thoughts, how to raise the comparability between different voting systems and different counts of participants in the final. In statistics, there is the Central Limit Theorem. It delivers a statement, what the chances are to excess a certain score just by random. According to this, the following might be a more sophisticated score to measure the dominance of an entry: Score = (points - expected pts.) / deviationI think I'm going to build a easy-to-handle excel tool, just give me a hint, if you're interested in it.

[@AlexESC]

That sounds interesting. I have an Excel file which I made for this video. I would need your tool to bring this idea to life if you don't mind. I think it's worth a shot.

[@isiiesc7775]

Norway 2009

[@michaelmccarthy9670]

1973 must be the best Eurovison fantastic top 3 all deserved to win

[@josemadrigalsuarez6828]

Antes había menos votos y menos países. No me importan las puntuaciones. Massiel ganó en 1968 con 29 puntos y ahora se gana con 300 o más. Distintos sistemas de puntuaciones. Pero el que gana gana igual.

[@terrybaker8156]

Love it

[@marcog.d.1840]

6:50 OMG 😓😓😓 That is the flag of the Spanish dictatorship, not the actual flag. I know, i am spanish 🇪🇸

[@GreysUES]

It was your flag in 1971 though

[@petra1995]

It's historically accurate. The current flag was adopted in 1981 :)

[@ottyguy6032]

The 1973 system was different with all songs getting at least one point from each jury member, so I don't know how fair it actually is to include it

[@xaruco]

Alex Vox : I just calculated the 2016 winner result, and should be in 1st place, because Ukraine got 534 points, and the maximum that could obtain was 600 (24 pts x 25 countries, all but the same), and I got an exactly 89%. (sorry for my English, isn't my language)

[@AlexESC]

Even if a country doesn't go through to the grand final, it still votes. So it's not 25 countries but 41.

[@TumbleTower]

Since 2004, countries which were eliminated in the semi-finals still voted in the grand final. Thus there were 42 countries voting in the ESC Grand Final 2016, including the 16 semi-finalists which failed to qualify. In 2016, winners Ukraine could have received 12 jury points from each of the other 41 countries, i.e. 492, plus 12 televoting points from each of the other 41 countries, i.e. 492. Thus the maximum achievable score was 984 points in 2016. Ukraine's grand final score of 534 points (jury and televoting combined) was just 54.27% of the maximum possible score (984 points), which is quite low really. Mind you, under the system introduced in 2016, is it realistic for a country to receive 12 jury points from every other country, and 12 televote points from every other country? Time will tell if the 2016 system is used in future years.

[@bulgaria9003]

about 54.2%

[@armacino89]

great list. thanks! btw, i have a question. why all the total points are not fold of 12??

[@epfdirectie8559]

There's been a mistake; in 2006, when Lordi won, you accidentally counted the points as if Finland could vote for itself. You posted it as 292/444 when it should be 292/432, which makes the percentage up to 67.59%. It should be in 21th place insteadof 28th

[@AlexESC]

Serbia & Montenegro voted in 2006 even though they did not compete.

[@pogodziej]

Interesting. Very interesting. :)

[@conorcollins7573]

Number 49 Ira Losco didn't she do walk on water this year for malta as well?

[@AlexESC]

She did.

[@danielmax8157]

I love how you put Franco's Spain flag on top 20

[@annieleonhart9318]

Wtf where is Marija Serifovic???

[@wyc94]

7:32 Why is playing bass guitar the pianist of abba?

[@sapphirethealpha5005]

9:24 made me smile (:

[@justinkanda228]

I don't wanna ruin the fun cause I really do like this method, but shouldn't the max points be higher for the more recent entries? If each country has 58 points to give out (1-8, 10, 12), the max amount of points available would be much higher: for example, Vienna 2015 would have 2,320 points available (40 countries X 58 points).

[@AlexESC]

You are talking about different method now, which I've tried but there were dozens pre-1970 songs and very few recent ones. Your method implicates total amount of points given to all countries during a contest. The method shown in the video uses the maximum score which one country could be awarded, and for 1975-2015 contests it would be 12 points x ( number of countries - 1 ) (because a country can't vote for itself, and it can't receive both 10 and 12 points from some another country, 12 is max). For example, if all 39 countries (excluding Sweden) gave their 12 points to Måns in 2015, then he would have been given 468 points in total (12 points x 39 countries).

[@cornstars]

nice, but difficult due to the different way of assigning points in 1967-1970 and in 1974. That's why Abba isn't in this list...

[@JSchultze94]

I really like this concept, but you should imo exclude pre 74 and 2016 as those were used with other methods. In a precentage top like this the pre 74 method makes it easier to get a higher score and the latter one makes it harder . It is of course impossible to make a fair precentage based top as there are more countries now competing in the competition then before, but a good try nevertheless! :)

[@AlexESC]

I just really wanted to include every single year. Maybe I'll make a video without 1956-1974 tho. But I think, essentially 2016 is equal to previous years since scores doubled and that's it, and so percentage is the same. Of course there is different method of counting but there were experiments with counting system before, in 2013, for instance. Thank you for watching anyway! UPD. Yeah, I got you now. It's much more difficult now to get to the top because you have to prevail among both juries and televoters.

[@JSchultze94]

Yeah was just about to show you that ;) Sweden would have gotten only 67,5 % in 2015 if the new system would have been used, instead of 78 % which it got in the old. The favorites get less precentage in the new system and the ''losers'' get more, and that makes the new voting a little bit more fair imo. It is truly a 50/50 system now. Of course the voting is far from perfect, but for now it is heading towards a more fairer direction.

[@basilissamaras4203]

My top 12 1.Russia 2015 2.Austria 2014 3.Denmark 2013 4.Greece 2004 5.Sweden 2012 6.Sweden 2015 7.Finland 2006 8.Ukraine 2004 9.Belgium 1986 10.Ireland 1987 11.Israel 1998 12.Latvia 2002

[@YouMyMuse]

Basilis Samaras, yes, Polina and Conchita were great!

[@user-xt3gt7gg9h]

I predict Anne-Marie David is first I was correct and i don't know how to feel

[@izumi.yoshida7]

Noticed at 4:11, but how does it get 60+% of the votes and not win? Maths was never my strong point so XD

[@9EscFan5]

Every country can give of course 12, 10 and 8-1 points. If you get all 12 points you have a 100% score but if you get all 10 points you have 83,33%. So the reason is the vote system. No idea if I explained it good enough with my English :P

[@Ornochestror]

Simply because this video shows how many points an entry got all of the points it could have got. A country gets the maximum amount of points, when it receives 12 points from every country. But don't forget that they also give 1-8 and 10 points, so the winner is only able to receive 12 of 58 points of all points one country can award, so a song can only receive 20,7 percent of ALL points. I hope this explanation isn't too bad ^^'

[@ChristopheWanteMandret]

methode juste et interressante

[@marcfeitoleon4723]

And Celine Dion or Secret Garden?

[@AlexESC]

Celine Dion is on 68th place while Secret Garden are on 73rd. Out of more than 1200 accounted songs.

[@marcfeitoleon4723]

+Alex Vox Oh. Very trank you!! A great top!!

[@oh_itsDTheo]

Unless anyone cares, in 2015 Mans scored 217 out of 240 points in his semi-final, which was 90%. I think Conchita scored 83% in hers as well.

[@Candoreable]

The description of this video says only finals were counted.

[@bulgaria9003]

It says that Måns scored 77.99% while Conchita got 67.13%.

[@georgecolvin7637]

what number did 'Puppet up a String' appear, UK Sandie Sahaw?

[@AlexESC]

347th place with 29.38%. That year hypothetically someone could literally take all points. That's why it's low.

[@pnavrrha]

what about Turkey? Bet you didn't even consider them.

[@avataryangchen19]

Pearl you mean Sertab in 2003? Turkey got 167 out of a possible 300 that year. That's 55.67%. The song that got 50th place on this list is at 59.31%. Turkey won't make it any way. hope that helps.

[@pnavrrha]

avataryangchen19 Bruh. It's al about thinking. No one ever thinks about us. Being isolated is sad, okay?

[@vincenttibimonga1424]

where is greece

[@SG31792]

Greece didn't receive that high of a percentage of points. As you can see, many "winners" are missing, especially many recent ones, because they won, but not by a lot.

[@eurovisioncy7624]

maxime la mine 1:25

[@Ffwoa]

Do you remember when the Eurovision used to be good. Now there are too many counties in the comp. :/

[@Anjiu1992]

in 1973 was a tough competition - the 2nd place is 7th in this vid with 78%. 78 % - and even didn't win!

[@williambillemeyling5647]

How do second places get over 50% of available points?

[@BlackSpiderPro]

How did Rollo & King get 67% of the points in 2001 but still not win? I'm not sure I understand... thanks :-)

[@BlackSpiderPro]

haha, I think I get it now - they scored a lot of 10's, right? And Estonia scored a lot of 12s :P

[@Skeatboart]

Thanks for 3rd ^^

[@abrahamcruz2165]

If in 1973 there were 160 available points, how could Spain get 125 and Luxembourg 129?

[@AlexESC]

The voting system was interesting that year. Each country had two jurors each of them awarding from 1 to 5 points to each song (so you can't even not to give points at all). Therefore, all jurors could give 5 points to each song and they would all have gotten 160 points.

[@Diana-if8qd]

Il Volo

[@isiiesc7775]

looooooooooove 31st

[@CheaRolf]

I don't know if I'm being stupid, but can someone please explain to me how on earth someone can come in 2nd place or lower and still have more than half the points? That shouldn't be possible in my mind... O_o

[@erikmrx9795]

WorshipYears It's not the percentage of the total points given that evening. Each country could give you 12 points so if all the other countries give you 9 points you'd have reach 75 percent of the possible points but would still have less than someone who got 10 points from each country.

[@CheaRolf]

Ohhh, I see, I didn't realise it was the points for each country. Thank you!

[@erikmrx9795]

WorshipYears You're welcome :)

[@superman198224]

How can you get 75% and finish third?

[@ufuksnmez98]

How did you calculated the percentage?

[@otorix8767]

Where is Waterloo by ABBA ?!?!

[@AlexESC]

Unfotunately, they got only 24 points because one juror could give a point only to one contestant. Which means theoretically in 1974 ABBA could receive all points from all countries. But they didn't and that's why they have quite a low percentage.

[@avataryangchen19]

Samer Pro Abba received 24 out of a possible 170. That is roughly 14%. 1974 was a really strong year that's why the votes were evenly scattered among many countries.

[@mankyswan]

Duncan Laurence got exactly 50.6097560976% of his available 984 points in 2019

[@bulgaria9003]

960

[@ImmClau]

No entiendo lo de la bandera de España,porque pones la de la dictadura?

[@josemadrigalsuarez6828]

Esa era la bandera que había en la España fascista de 1971. Aunque sigue la misma con otro escudo, similar.

[@Szarko32c]

I don;t get it. How do you get 60% of points and finishe 2-4 ?! 50%+1 is a pure win.

[@avataryangchen19]

Szarko the voting system in eurovision isn't like what you have in elections where all candidates divide 100%. In Eurovision it's more of who gets to get closer to 100% since votes are distributed differently.

[@HH1984de]

wow how many hours have you spend by counting that

[@AlexESC]

Excel really helped me with the counting :)

[@michaellau7413]

Where did you get the data for this?

[@AlexESC]

I processed all the data in Excel myself. The method is in the description.

[@anthivoumv3279]

what happens with UK??

[@isiiesc7775]

I Love 11th place

[@martalewandowski5812]

its time to change the contest....every country should send one of their top hits from last year....just look a this list...even the high voted songs are horrible.

[@iyanao3954]

How is possible that you put the spanish franquist flag with the chicken... Please be concious about what you do.

[@petra1995]

The francoist flag was still in use in the 70's.

[@iyanao3954]

You are not Spanish I suppose, I don't give a damn if it was used in that period. You think i don't know it?. You do not know what that flag represents for most spaniards and the history that is behind that flag. Many of you want to seem like bloody historians commenting this type of stuff and you have no idea.

[@petra1995]

@@iyanao3954 Being a democracy is not a precursor to participating in Eurovision. I'd say using the historical flag sheds light on history.

[@annes4937]

I don't understand. Please explain.

[@AlexESC]

I tried my best to explain in the description and under other comments. The percentage shows how successful the artist was. If he had got all 12 points, he would have had total of 100%.

[@simen6590]

real 1° place: Grande amore of Il Volo

[@raz2432]

Romania 2010,2006,2005?

[@Lorano98]

37 😍😍😍😍

[@lalo1934]

LUXEMBURG FTW

[@arnaldurrobertsson6899]

Where is "IS IT TRUE?"

[@AlexESC]

It's on the 169th place with 44.31%.

[@wolcinwolcin]

#7 Spain 78% and 2nd place ?

[@kian965]

How ironic that first is Luxembourg

[@IzayoiArwena]

Kiiiannn i expected Abba or Jamala

[@Finfooty]

Aziza Alkan Jamala, are you fucking kidding me?

[@IzayoiArwena]

As best scoring winner?

[@kian965]

Uh no, it's about the percentage of how many points are earned.

[@conorcollins7573]

I don't understand how number 50 o ly came second with 59.31% -_-

[@conorcollins7573]

Same with 49

[@conorcollins7573]

+Conor Collins and 48

[@conorcollins7573]

+Conor Collins and basically a lot of them

[@conorcollins7573]

Oh I get it I am so dumb -_-

[@dliessmgg]

100% is if every country gave them maximum points. But every country gives points to multiple acts. So it's possible for second place (and even lower ranks) to have more that 50%. It just means that all the big points were concentrated on a few acts, and likely a number of acts got zero points total.

[@namenlos40]

It's a good idea to make percentage-list, but it is still not completely fair. Because it's easier to get a higher percentage with less contestants.

[@AlexESC]

If a voting system is the same then not really. Every new country brings another set of points. And so, right now it's a constant number of 116 (includes both juries' and televoters' points).

[@mynameissomeone6929]

The thing I don't understand is : Why People for exemple from Norway (who speaks norwegian, live in Norway) SING IN F*CKING ENGLISH? They are from a country, representy that country wy the hell are they singing in another language? It's like if an Italian representing Italy sings in Swedish...the fuck? They should not let compet countries not singing in their mother language it's insane

[@Steven-hq4mb]

My name is Someone Exactly, for example Sweden knows its shit, remember Abba? In the 1974 edition they didn't apply the language rule and that's the reason they won, like boi why wouldn't you want to sing in your own language? Maybe they are ashamed of their own language... Nowdays is more like Anglovision.

[@MihajloDj100]

UHave counting wrong!

[@AlexESC]

If you were to point out the mistakes, it would be more helpful.

[@MihajloDj100]

no on that way, i thougt this isnt right way to count, better way is to gather points of all states in the final and found that occupies a certain percentage of the state, I think that this way of calculation most accurate :)

[@AlexESC]

Mihajlo Djordjević I thought about it but it just doesn't work. It wouldn't change the order of songs from 1975 and newer but these songs would be underrepresented, with the highest song since 1975 (Ding-a-Dong) on the 18th place and the highest 2000s song (Fairytale) on the 60th place. So, there would be a lot of songs on top from before 1975 which didn't even do great. The trick is in voting systems. The most popular pre-1975 one was that 10 jurors distribute 10 points. And so, all 10 points from some country can go to one specific song, while the current system doesn't allow award one country with all your 58 points (that is 12+10+8+...+1 combined).

[@AlexESC]

By the way, you can't say wrong just because it's different. Every counting method has a right to exist :)

[@MihajloDj100]

i dont thin wrong i think that isnt the correctest way to say best song. Did u understand?

[@paige_31_70]

No common linnetts? shame

[@abtinnassori6148]

no loreen?

[@AlexESC]

11th place.

[@abnormallyfunny]

Are you dumb, deaf or blind?

[@harends2132]

is Lena on the list?

[@thomashernadi1444]

Yeah, also wonder why she is not on the list.

[@AlexESC]

She's on the 95th place with 53,95%.

[@thomashernadi1444]

Wow. That's a big surprise 'cause her score was quite high.

[@johnnyrambo107]

esto confirma lo digo siempre, el país de habla no inglesa quw mejor música hace en inglés es Suecia muy por encima del resto, y de habla no inglesa que no canta en inglés Italia con diferencia sobre el resto seguido de lejos por Francia, España como desde hace más de 30 años dando pena meno Anabel,pastora,sergio y poco más, lo mejor que hizo España en los últimos años fue al Chiki Chiki porque por lo menos no reímos del farsa Festival

[@pekegamerot]

España ahora queda última en Eurovisión Esto con Franco no pasaba

[@josemadrigalsuarez6828]

No , solo pasaba sentencias de muertes.

[@yavuzz8680]

Where is sertab

[@thomashernadi1444]

Lena ???