Renault Clio V 1.0 SCe 75 (2020) AUTOBAHN POV TOP SPEED 🚀

[@jzrlegendary9683]

180 for 75hp is pretty impresive

[@Raph06440]

My clio 2, 110hp for 220km/h

[@vmoca]

@@Raph06440 Yes, 110 is more than 75, coincidentally as 220 is more than 180.

[@ahmadmohd8595]

That was downhill

[@zbigniewwielgus1249]

@@Raph06440 Propably a lot more torque

[@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24]

Hi, I own the Clio and would like to write you something about it. I have the 67HP variant, by the way, if you buy the car without turbo the best choice, because the 75HP variant only brings something if you really drive it with a high RPM, because it offers no extra power in the lower ones. For the car with heated seats, full LED, fog lights, cruise control etc. etc. I paid only 15,000. Makes you wonder how is that possible, especially considering this equipment and build quality. The point is that Renault has been very smart here and knows that this car will most likely be used by only one or two people at most. For this reason, there is also less comfort in the rear - simply managed. I love this solution by Renault, because I use the car only maximum with my girlfriend. Best equipped for us, everyone has heated seats, it has air conditioning, etc. Best of all I find that everything is also geared to the driver, so the passenger should not be so involved according to Renault logic, and I like that! About the infotainment system: Yes, the built-in processor is very lame, it's annoying. Remedy is the use of the steering wheel control, since this strangely often responds better than the display. On the other hand; I have the variant without navigation system, the car has a super integration for Android Auto or Apple Carplay. Thus, I understand Renault's pricing policy to install a cheap processor, because if you use the aforementioned software, the processor of the smartphone is finally needed, and since the car is intended primarily for younger people and they usually have a powerful smartphone, I find the decision then again good! Because so again more money was left for the comfort or the build quality. I mean, the car costs in this equipment about 1500-2000 euros more than the equally equipped Dacia Sandero, and in the difference between the build quality and the implementation of the equipment lie whole universes! In conclusion, I can say: For young people a perfect car! In an emergency also a small family car! Otherwise, a super build quality and well-designed technology. Above all, however, I advise against the higher motorizations, contrary to the many comments here! Yes, 90-100-130 HP are great, but at what price? I live in the country and get along great on the highway! Often I'm even faster, because just because there are no speed limits in Germany does not mean that all people drive Formula 1. With the 67 HP I get super over land, highway and especially through the city. For me, despite the criticism of the engine from many sides based on my own accumulated experience a super all-rounder, because the lower motorizations are also significantly cheaper in insurance! Likewise, a Sauger without turbo breaks down less quickly ;) For those who think that you can not overtake with it or similar: Yes, you can! But yes, sometimes you just have to bring a little patience, but since I'm not on the road to kill myself or others I wait very happy to one or the other vehicle. Just drive relaxed; perfectly possible with this car!

[@emreozcanan6563]

you said u paid like 15000 , is that € currency?

[@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24]

@@emreozcanan6563 With an offer for sure, maybe even less then. But the facelift model has just come out, which may of course have different prices again. I also often saw 16-20,000 back then, depending on the equipment variant.

[@Sevan59]

so 180 km speed is weak for 75 hp ? really ! what you expect from this engine , and this engine is tried and tested in many models , very trustworthy .

[@tomcray7907]

Пфф, пежо 208й на 1 атмосферном литре с 68лс едет 180кмч

[@nanospace2389]

The 90 hp goes the same speed Without going down a hill

[@MM-rw6gp]

@@tomcray7907 Yes but Peugeot has 4 cilinder and this engine has only 3 !!

[@tomcray7907]

@@MM-rw6gp в Пежо тоже 3 цилиндра

[@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24]

In addition, the car could drive faster, but it simply lacks another gear.

[@vsk8849]

Talisman 1.8 tce 225 ? Or even megane 4 1.3 tce 140/160 hp!Nice videos,keep the good work up!

[@attilad.1427]

Thanks for the test drive! But in 2021, this engine.., Imagine it loaded with passengers and luggage. :O

[@attilad.1427]

@spidy9237 power to weight ratio, which is everything. Motorways in the 21th century are way more crowded then 40 years ago, overtaking time is critical thing.

[@aikhaa996]

This motor isn't made for this. Its only to drive in City.. 1,0 75Hp on 3 cylinder without turbo.. Even if you drive at 130km/h your consomption is so high

[@tommasosposetti1087]

I have the same exact car, with the same engine, with 2 passengers plus the driver and 2 full backpacks the car performed normally, like if there was only the driver. Is a tested engine with no problem, obviously if you compare it with a turbo engine that has more torque its more snappy, but the car has a perfect gear ratio so there is no problem, plus the fuel consumption is great.

[@attilad.1427]

@@tommasosposetti1087 Well I can imagine, try overtaking a truck on a single lane road with a lot of curves and going uphill.. Physics don’t lie.. No torque, no sufficant power, compared even to my 20 year old VW with 1.6L 8v 100bhp, that weighs over 1200kgs. 100/(1200/1000)=83 hp/ton (VW Bora) 75/(1148/1000)=65 hp/ton (Renault Clio) Simple maths, also you can add the weight of the payload into the calculation.

[@tommasosposetti1087]

@@attilad.1427 i’m sorry but why you need to overtake a truck going up hill in a single lane road with a lot of curves 😂😂. Even with a 300hp car I wouldn’t do that.

[@ianclaudio777]

This car deserves more power

[@Raphael_le_avec]

Clio has changed a lot lately but a pity that the Clio RS will no longer exist 😔

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

I hope that they will change their mind. The RS models always where awesome drivers car that everybody loved.

[@PaulHojda]

Good top speed for such a weak engine, shows that the new Clio is very aerodynamic. But almost 16 seconds to 100 is dangerously slow. You have to rev it to 6000 all the time just to keep up with normal traffic. And i thought my mother's 1.2 16v clio was slow, I couldn't even imagine how slow this one would feel

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Totally agree the acceleration is a nightmare 😅 Even the top engines haven't gotten any quicker throughout the Clio generations .

[@aleksander002]

I was driving a car for 3 years with even weaker engine (67HP) with 0-100 in 17 seconds and I still live. OFC your speedometer starts at 3k and ends at 6k rpms but if you remember not to do any risky moves you can still be fine

[@tomcray7907]

80кмч по трассе и 40кмч в городе, зачем мощнее двигатель? А для этих скоростей его за глаза, даже можно и 60лс.

[@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24]

@@aleksander002 i totally agree with that. all of my cars had 60-75 horsepower. the higher engines just get their full power with higher rpm. u just have to know that u cant drive like an a** and just wait some times. but i can live with that.

[@gnoux23]

"1.0 SCe 75" = 73ch only... so it's a good engine for a Twingo.

[@airpolska]

I had one of these as a rental recently in Poland. This is without a doubt the roughest engine I've ever experienced. The idle on the 3 cylinder is so jerky and that's before you even get into how slow it is. Also the user interface on the media / radio screen is horrible... you have to click 2 buttons before you can even adjust the volume if you are a passenger.

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Yeah I’m not a big fan of the no button Trend all car manufactures are seem tobe going recently. Generally I do enjoy three cylinder engines they are more alive and sound better then the four bangers but this car for sure would be better with a smoother more refined four cylinder

[@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24]

Hi, I own the Clio and would like to write you something about it. I have the 67HP variant, by the way, if you buy the car without turbo the best choice, because the 75HP variant only brings something if you really drive it with a high RPM, because it offers no extra power in the lower ones. For the car with heated seats, full LED, fog lights, cruise control etc. etc. I paid only 15,000. Makes you wonder how is that possible, especially considering this equipment and build quality. The point is that Renault has been very smart here and knows that this car will most likely be used by only one or two people at most. For this reason, there is also less comfort in the rear - simply managed. I love this solution by Renault, because I use the car only maximum with my girlfriend. Best equipped for us, everyone has heated seats, it has air conditioning, etc. Best of all I find that everything is also geared to the driver, so the passenger should not be so involved according to Renault logic, and I like that! About the infotainment system: Yes, the built-in processor is very lame, it's annoying. Remedy is the use of the steering wheel control, since this strangely often responds better than the display. On the other hand; I have the variant without navigation system, the car has a super integration for Android Auto or Apple Carplay. Thus, I understand Renault's pricing policy to install a cheap processor, because if you use the aforementioned software, the processor of the smartphone is finally needed, and since the car is intended primarily for younger people and they usually have a powerful smartphone, I find the decision then again good! Because so again more money was left for the comfort or the build quality. I mean, the car costs in this equipment about 1500-2000 euros more than the equally equipped Dacia Sandero, and in the difference between the build quality and the implementation of the equipment lie whole universes! In conclusion, I can say: For young people a perfect car! In an emergency also a small family car! Otherwise, a super build quality and well-designed technology. Above all, however, I advise against the higher motorizations, contrary to the many comments here! Yes, 90-100-130 HP are great, but at what price? I live in the country and get along great on the highway! Often I'm even faster, because just because there are no speed limits in Germany does not mean that all people drive Formula 1. With the 67 HP I get super over land, highway and especially through the city. For me, despite the criticism of the engine from many sides based on my own accumulated experience a super all-rounder, because the lower motorizations are also significantly cheaper in insurance! Likewise, a Sauger without turbo breaks down less quickly ;) For those who think that you can not overtake with it or similar: Yes, you can! But yes, sometimes you just have to bring a little patience, but since I'm not on the road to kill myself or others I wait very happy to one or the other vehicle. Just drive relaxed; perfectly possible with this car!

[@unknown-vz1xi]

@@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24 1.0 tce 100 is the best option imo beacause highway require power sometimes 🙂

[@FrEffectsIntroforOffer24]

@@unknown-vz1xi Now, I don't know what country you live in, but here in Germany there is often no speed limit. Nevertheless, after 9 months with the Clio, the 67 hp is quite enough for me. I'm still mostly in the fast lane, since most Germans tend to drive at the recommended speed (130 km/h in our country). In any case, you can not just pull out when one comes from behind, and you have to wait longer times behind a car that you want to overtake, so as not to slow anyone down, but once up to speed you actually stay at the high speed. My cruising speed with the Clio is about 160 km/h, now and then also 170/80 km/h. You always need a good observation of the traffic and I prefer to wait longer than to slow someone down. This argument with the fast overtaking thanks to the increased power is an absolute luxury problem that I do not need. The lower power has even made me a more defensive and attentive driver, whereas with my Golf with 150 hp I did like to really push it and do riskier maneuvers that I would never do with the Clio. In the end, I feel safer on the road with the Clio. Of course, more horsepower is an advantage in traffic, but in the end I save money and repair costs, because I drive it as a naturally aspirated car and not a high-powered one. My forest car is a Dacia Logan with exactly the same engine, only with turbo and 90 hp. The difference is not so huge and the turbo will probably have to be replaced at 100,000km anyway.

[@faikekmekci4697]

they r selling it as 65 hp in my country ,its a made in Turkey car , the cleverance is hide on its last gear ratio , enjoy the dinamism and safe speeds

[@ForeverEuroHouse]

Nice driving

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Thanks 👍

[@ayoubbbcelkamel7013]

Is it similar to Seat ibiza 1.0 mpi 75hp...And wich one you prefer ibiza or clio for the same engine and thank you boss😉👍

[@bubuslk]

How did you manage to end the trip with more fuel in the tank than when you set off ?

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

im sorry i cant tell you the oil industries will come after me

[@thievonedgar3798]

Nice key !!!

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

It looks good👍 But I don't think it would be very handy on a keychain

[@netanelshemo]

@@TopSpeedBrothers You are right. From experience, the key is just looks good but not handy at all.

[@OL-T-Owner]

hallo wie kann ich die traktions controlle ausschalten bei diesem auto

[@levipop8746]

Gutes Video mach weiter so. Kannst du mal ein Smart for two fahren das wäre lustig. Or in english. Nice video. Can you drive a smart for two. Can you speak german?

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Dank dir für den vorschlag👍 der smart steht auf jedenfall bei uns auf der liste. Hoffentlich haben wir bald die möglichkeit einen zu filmen.

[@gioelevignale941]

Hi, nice video. Can you do a test of renault clio 5 diesel 85 hp?

[@antoniobarac3463]

Perfectly

[@Onur19O7]

Thanks

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

As always, you are very welcome. It's always great to hear that you enjoy our videos 👍

[@dvds45v]

Is this a similar engine as Dacia Sandero Stepway has? Do you plan to drive Stepway?

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Yes, it's the same engine. Just with different power output. Dacia is on our list. We were positively surprised by the Logan we drove this Summer. Here's the link to the Dacia Logan we filmed: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zn2niXSrabtjjcU

[@dvds45v]

@@TopSpeedBrothers Thanks for the reply 👍 I'm thinking of new Sandero Stepway. Not a bad car for it's value. Agree?

[@filipedanielcorreia4500]

Spectacular video!! What is mean " Sce " in the Clio engine?

[@tiagosimoes2529]

Petrol engine

[@MrToluen60]

Sce : atmospheric (without turbo)

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

I had to look it up as well. SCe stands for "Smart Control Efficiency" they use this name for their naturally aspirated engines.

[@Dżenson_Baton]

3:44 Full throttle and still falling behind xD Just joking, car is nice looking, must be fun and economical to drive

[@Noneofyourbusiness_HUN]

1:09 barelly keeping up with the dpd van is such a shame

[@Sandokan3]

Good car, You need 5000rpm just to follow Red DPD van 1:05 :) really, y want a car like this reno :)

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Amazon Prime delivery is no joke

[@Iosif.dumitru01]

What about fuel consumption?

[@zeoxp]

Nice 👍

[@Alex15martin]

Time to 0-100 Yes :)

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

more like a strong maybe 😂😂

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

more like a strong maybe 😂😂

[@4l3x50]

Please could you do a Volkswagen Up?

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

thanks for the suggestion👍 The VW Up is already on our list. Hopefully we get the opportunity to film one soon

[@OL-T-Owner]

hello how can I turn off the traction control on this car

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

not fully

[@IL-TRIMONE-PUGLIESE]

I have the same engine Renault 1.0 Sce 75hp but on a Dacia Sandero and the max speed is 160 km/h. Why less than a Clio if the engine is the same?

[@watannen]

Aero. And this top speed was on a slight downhill

[@Mert4066]

also clio has less weight then sandero

[@hubertwalter1749]

I wonder what the fuel consumption on the Autobahn is, must be crazy high with the revs at almost 5000 at around 150 km/h. This engine is only good for up to 120 km/h I guess.

[@matejaem]

Clio is a city car, especially if you’re getting it with a non-turbo SCe engine

[@driver7698]

a dacia sandero with same engine?????

[@dogan2676]

yes

[@lucamarrocu5447]

no more drifting at the start of the video??!

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Sadly the Clio V has a Electric handbrake 😔 But more will come soon👍

[@yasinmert6177]

s'il vous plais essayer la Renault Clio MK3 GT 1.6 16v 130 ps 🤩🤩

[@sefakilic5249]

Yogamina

[@thomasaucanthe6817]

A quand une laguna 3 2.0dCi 130 150 ou 180ps ?

[@m_7ffm]

Can you do Mercedes C220 2017 T Modell?❤️

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Thank you for the suggestion. More Mercedes Benz will come soon 👍

[@sergiipatsula6713]

Video esta grabado bien. Pero Clio hay que comprar con 1.3 turbo 130 h.p.

[@il_ross]

Find a Toyota Yaris 1.0 68ps or 65ps MK1 and do it pleaseee

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

that car brings back memories. We will try to get one to film 👍

[@il_ross]

@@TopSpeedBrothers yes, that's history. One of the best engines during those years, 16V, VVT-i technology and only 820kg of empty weight. It's still pretty funny and fast to drive compared to other small engine's cars :D

[@il_ross]

@Stefan Nikolov i tried a 0-100, done it in 12.8 seconds (gps measure). So, pretty fast compared to other small engines (and low hp) cars...

[@ИгорьКоптев-х7ш]

👌

[@andreidumitru2936]

What happend with Renault? Such a small engine and only 75hp? We are în 2021 not in 1971 !!

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Base model

[@RefiiQ]

GOLF MK5 2.0 TDI

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Thanks for the suggestion. We are planning to do the VW Golfs in the future

[@albertog6491]

Vw polo 1.0 tsi?

[@kabash0683]

VW Golf 2.0 TDI?

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Thank you for the suggestion. The VW Golf will definitely come in the future

[@kabash0683]

@@TopSpeedBrothers Oh thank you:)

[@CherenThe]

takas kabul mü ? :D bana verinnnnnnn ne olurrrrrr :D

[@justemre9618]

Reis onların orda su parasına bildiğin

[@CherenThe]

@@justemre9618 o yüzden takas öneriyorum ya :D

[@ladyislavstalinskaya6312]

lol in the US people wouldn't even put this engine in a beard trimmer lol

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

😂

[@anltutar419]

I have 98 1.2 twingo my top speed 192

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

scary and cool the same time

[@imraneaitsy8750]

Ford fiesta

[@Lucas141202]

3 cylinder

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Most of them sound great

[@danmunteanu1326]

Incredibly poor shifting

[@nikolamrdjenov3909]

If you drive it that way....it will last very shortly,3 pots micro engine

[@1964Orzel]

only 1.5 dci the other is trash

[@seroooserroo243]

1.2 16 valf 80 bg palio süpper clio 1.0 düşük çekiş ve motor

[@eg2444]

0-100: 3 days

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

😂😂

[@markphantom8995]

Clio Is nice but engine 🤢

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

I totally agree it handles nice but it is underpowered. We also drove the 130 hp version which was actually fun to drive. Heres the link to that video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l4TCYWyDoN6Aibs

[@76notam]

@@TopSpeedBrothers good test , but , yes you'd better drive a 130 hp ! lol ...this engine is for zen and cool drive with a low consumption petrol ...lol ...but the engine 's sound is like a " competetion 's engine " ...only a 3 cylinders 75 hp ...but not bad for my opinion 😉👍

[@umin05]

Slow af. Only for driving in cities.

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

I guess if you don’t live in Germany it’s not so important

[@aymenboubaker5277]

This engine IS not for speed IS so 👎👎👎👎👇👇👇👇

[@TopSpeedBrothers]

Not at all better for for the city

[@berkebmw2810]

Rezalet bir araba iğrenç bu paranın psini hak etmez

[@justemre9618]

E berke kardeş yapabilecek bişey yok seninde BMW Hayalin var herhalde para yok kimsede

[@berkebmw2810]

@@justemre9618 hayalmi😂😂 sen beni küçük veledlerle karşılaştırdın dikkat et

[@justemre9618]

@@berkebmw2810 yoo gayet öyle insan gibi söylüyorum bu arada benimde yaşım o kadarda küçük değil 19 dayız daha

[@fiziginanasnsikeyim4398]

Paramız buna yetiyor ne yapalım. Gören de diyecek bundan 10 sene evvel twin turbo 200 beygir araçlara biniyordu millet.

[@fabiooliveira2721]

Nah Very Slow. 160 flat surface top speed...180 downhill. ,0-100 15s...wtf and 100-150 1hour