I don't typically give much thought to tornado size comparison videos which use the same broken template as all the rest, but this one may just have the most blatantly hilarious fuck up I've seen yet. The image you've used to represent the "1999 Oklahoma Tornado" (which in almost all of these comparison videos is in reference to the May 3rd Bridge Creek F5) is the Anadarko, Oklahoma F1. While part of the same outbreak, this is not the correct tornado. Now this wouldn't normally ruffle me too much, as quite a few of the images you've used are incorrect. No, what really gets me is that the image you used less than a second prior to represent the "average EF5" *ACTUALLY IS* of the Bridge Creek tornado. All I'm asking is that you do just a tad bit more research than typing "Oklahoma Tornado 1999" into google and using the first image you get. An article or two would have quickly revealed what the actual tornado looked like, and I wouldn't be giving you my spiel.
@Le_epic_eclipse Жыл бұрын
Pro tip use cycles or cone shapes for tornado size