Toy Car UAM Problem with Two Different Accelerations

  Рет қаралды 30,808

Flipping Physics

Flipping Physics

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 29
@Andrew_Hanford
@Andrew_Hanford Жыл бұрын
Why these videos aren't more popular is a mystery. Very well done. Seriously.
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 11 жыл бұрын
Rather than talk about the physics of the new video (slightly more complicated UAM problem with two interconnected parts), I want to talk about my acting. Oh yeah, my acting. I have been working on, with my wife's help, what my characters do when they are not talking and how they interact. Notice how @ 13:30 Billy and Bobby basically have a quiet race to see who can use their calculator faster and Bo is just disgusted by it. Although I think my favorite moment in the video happens @ 12:10 when Bo notices a pencil on his desk. Yep, who knew I was going to be an actor? Or maybe not.
@egoiisticprince7977
@egoiisticprince7977 7 жыл бұрын
u r Awesome at every thing. .. 😍 this actually make us to love you . Even that much distance doesn't matter 😂😂 love from Pakistan
@aji5016
@aji5016 3 жыл бұрын
The details are everything
@atarah7294
@atarah7294 7 жыл бұрын
I think Bo is really smart because he don't use a note book to write problems and don't use a calculator .
@alfredkeanuserut8060
@alfredkeanuserut8060 9 жыл бұрын
This is very helpful and entertaining!
@oliverosjevyp.6363
@oliverosjevyp.6363 2 жыл бұрын
youre the best teacher here in yt
@glr1246
@glr1246 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much ! I understand at the same time at the students lol. By the way you make me fancy having class with myselves 😂
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 3 жыл бұрын
You are so welcome!
@eoo37
@eoo37 6 жыл бұрын
Is memorizing equations an inefficient way? Using an equation is important, but I don't know how it's derived.
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 6 жыл бұрын
The issue with showing how the Uniformly Accelerated Motion equations are derived is that it requires calculus. I show derivations of two of the UAM equations in this video, if you are interested: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGfFmmh-ZtWqo6cm27s
@DuyPham-123
@DuyPham-123 3 жыл бұрын
such a helpful video
@sidra884
@sidra884 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you ❤️
@rameezwaniii
@rameezwaniii 6 жыл бұрын
You are doing a great job 🙌🔥
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@jacob5292-s7l
@jacob5292-s7l 8 жыл бұрын
for displacement 2, why did I get a different answer when using the equation1/2 (vf+vi) delta t1/2 (.22+2.496)1.1I got 1.4938. Even though the total displacement ended up being 3.4906, 2 sigfigs the same answer, 3.5 m why is my answer different?
@alphawtel3157
@alphawtel3157 4 жыл бұрын
You didn't us 0.219
@shaikhnbake
@shaikhnbake 6 жыл бұрын
@12:41 When solving the displacement for Part 2, why does using the same UAM equation for part one not work (I tried it and the answer I got was 2.5773) even though all the variables needed are available(V2f, V2i, and delta t) Any help would be very much appreciated Thanks :)
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 6 жыл бұрын
It does work. V2f = 0.219 m/s, V2i = 2.496 m/s, Δt2 = 1.1 s, results in Δx2 = 1.49325 m/s, which is the same. I am not sure where your error is.
@shaikhnbake
@shaikhnbake 6 жыл бұрын
UAM equation I used for part 2 delta x2 = (1/2)(v2f+v2i)(delta t2) Answer I got (1/2)(2.19+2.496)(1.1) = 2.5773 m/s
@shaikhnbake
@shaikhnbake 6 жыл бұрын
The UAM equation you used for Part 2 worked with me when I used it, but when I tried using the UAM equation from Part 1 to find the displacement for Part 2, I ended up with the wrong answer. Thanks for replying in the first place, your a living legend.
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 6 жыл бұрын
V2f = 0.219 m/s ≠ 2.19 m/sPlease take a moment to think about how much time you have spent working on this and all it really comes down to is being careful with reading and writing. So often students rush through problems and think they do not understand the physics, when all they really did was make a simple mistake. Slow down. Be careful. Read carefully. You will understand more and you will learn faster. Best of luck and I hope that helps! (Also, I'm not trying to be snarky; just trying to give some legitimate advice) (Double also. I just looked up "snarky" and this is what the dictionary said: "cranky; irritable: Bobby's always a bit snarky before his nap." I agree. Bobby is always a bit snarky before his nap. 😀)
@shaikhnbake
@shaikhnbake 6 жыл бұрын
Wooooow. Thanks once again, couldn't believe I made such a simple mistake.
@Mech.Masters
@Mech.Masters 8 жыл бұрын
Is the Motion of planets around the sun, an example of uniform velocity motion?
@FlippingPhysics
@FlippingPhysics 8 жыл бұрын
I don't know what "uniform velocity motion" is, however, the motion of planets around the sun is not an example of uniformly accelerated motion.
@jacob5292-s7l
@jacob5292-s7l 8 жыл бұрын
I used the rounded .22... not .219
@aji5016
@aji5016 3 жыл бұрын
13:04 ??? Bo is secretly an innate genius...
@juanguio5932
@juanguio5932 3 жыл бұрын
lol, i saw that too
@juanguio5932
@juanguio5932 3 жыл бұрын
If you think about it, it gives his character a deeper meaning. It’s not actually that he doesn’t care about learning or the class, he’s just so smart that he’s bored by it. 🤔
Understanding Uniformly Accelerated Motion
5:58
Flipping Physics
Рет қаралды 96 М.
What's The Longest Word You Can Write With Seven-Segment Displays?
8:56
«Кім тапқыр?» бағдарламасы
00:16
Balapan TV
Рет қаралды 151 М.
How I Turned a Lolipop Into A New One 🤯🍭
00:19
Wian
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Understanding Instantaneous and Average Velocity using a Graph
12:51
Flipping Physics
Рет қаралды 58 М.
Graphical Uniformly Accelerated Motion (UAM) Example Problem
7:58
Flipping Physics
Рет қаралды 29 М.
The unexpectedly hard windmill question (2011 IMO, Q2)
16:03
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Repairing Underground Power Cables Is Nearly Impossible
13:34
Practical Engineering
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
e to the pi i for dummies
15:51
Mathologer
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
«Кім тапқыр?» бағдарламасы
00:16
Balapan TV
Рет қаралды 151 М.