100 Years of Women's Voting Rights | Citizen: Full-Length Documentary

Рет қаралды 84,326

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 95

@KamFails 3 жыл бұрын

Love how you bookended this with Dessa's "Sound the Bells." She's an I C O N to me lol Also thanks for this great lens into the suffrage movement! Interesting to hear the story from Minnesota.

@DeathByFashion1 Ай бұрын

This made me cry. And made me realize a lot of the civil equalities we have today have been brought because of strong women. Because women suffered. Because their children suffered.

@davidstevenson9517 9 ай бұрын

New Zealand was THE first country where women enjoyed emancipation, in 1893, nearly 130 years ago. 🇳🇿👧📦

@Art4ArtsSakeVideo 8 ай бұрын

Truly excellent and informative documentary at its best. Well done, Twin Cities PBS. And women, pay attention: those hard-won rights -- especially the right to vote -- are at risk of erosion everywhere in our nation in 2024. Stand up, register, and vote!

@user-th5hx7kl1l Ай бұрын

Merci beaucoup pour l'histoire de 100 years of women's voters rights❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Millions of blessings, Esther St Juste

@healingv1sion 3 жыл бұрын

4:15 in 2006 when I was 18 years old I was chosen to sit on a jury and the judge and the defense and the prosecution try to kick me off the jury but I stood my ground. I was on the jury for 2 days

@adelexia171 Жыл бұрын

(ill delete later working on history)) ,, so timestamps are easier to navigate :') 1. (3:19) When were women given the right to own property? 2. (5:06) Most historians credit the origin of the Women’s Suffrage Movement to who? 3. (11:10) What term do political scientists use to explain black women being excited for black men earning the right to vote? 4. (13:50) What does Julia B Nelson mean as the idea of freedom being “intersectional?” 5. (17:50) Why did women in the 1870’s go on crusades to local bars and establishments? 6. (22:53) Dr Ripley said her duty was to: 7. (34:21) What was the name of Nellie Francis’ radical and groundbreaking speech? 8. (37:35) What were a vast number of Native people reminded of when they think about the suffrage movement? 9. (46:20) How were picketing women, fighting for their rights, treated? 10. (50:30) What did the letter that Harry Burn’s received say? 11. (50:48) What was the official day the 19th Amendment became a law? 12. (53:45) What year was the Voting Rights Act passed? How many years after Women’s Suffrage?

@JLS613 2 жыл бұрын

It would have been nice to show all the women of different races who fought as well, more specifically Ida B. Wells.

@bertdaggler4837 Жыл бұрын

woke documentary but not woke enough. why not make your own?

@JLS613 Жыл бұрын

@@bertdaggler4837 1. I don't use or go by the term "woke" unless I'm referring to sleep. 2. I enjoyed the documentary but it only showed a quarter of the women who made strides for us. I was expecting to learn a lot more about unsung heroes from all backgrounds that I didn't know, or wasn't as familiar with. 3. I feel the same way when I watch a March On Washington documentary and it only highlights MLK and main speakers, but not any of the background organizers. Im also guilty of being a little upset that StarLords and Gamora's background is heavily covered on Guardians of the Galaxy, but we don't know much on the other crew members. 4. Its my party and I can cry if I want to.

@alexchavez3244 18 күн бұрын

They won’t because it makes white people uncomfortable when they always talk about black and white but never brown people because they know we went threw the real Suffrage we weren’t humans being after the late 1970s and they expected us too be economically Efficient when white people created the debt we have today and blame minorities yet they know themselves couldn’t assimilate too other cultures they would rate die but we survived it all and we are still here and it’s funny they say woman stop it start using race and culture 😂💀

@ocean1233 2 ай бұрын

NO HUMAN IS SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER ‼️ EVERY GENERATION MUST DEMAND AND PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS 📢📢

@ocean1233 2 ай бұрын

GREED KILLS 👿

@pgpc6448 Жыл бұрын

I certainly met more diverse leaders of our historical past in this video piece! Very impressive Minnesota!!

@angelaclark6482 7 күн бұрын

This was an exceptional video!

@katherinenyberg7891 4 жыл бұрын

Absolutely Brilliant! I really appreciate and enjoyed all that I learned!

@ozadicognizant6670 2 жыл бұрын

This was very interesting I am glad women are allowed to vote

@jackjohnson6230 2 жыл бұрын

as long as women have the responsibility that comes with being able to vote aka being drafted and going to war

@sfridisow185 Жыл бұрын

@@jackjohnson6230 WHY ARE YOU SO OBSESSED WITH GOING TO WAR?!! CAN YOU JUST SHUT UP?!!

@jkinder1982 Жыл бұрын

@@jackjohnson6230Are you saying that even men who are unfit to be drafted (disabled, too old, etc.) should not be allowed to vote?

@jackjohnson6230 Жыл бұрын

@@jkinder1982 when men were young they could be and were drafted for true equality women should be the same not sure about the disabled

@jackjohnson6230 Жыл бұрын

@trollnerd bs it has so In th us and many countries its still there now Wake up and stop being ignorant

@thomasduggan8755 4 жыл бұрын

VERY INTRESTING BEST WISHES FROM MANCHESTER ENGLAND ❤️

@blinkbones3236 3 жыл бұрын

POV : tu passes l'agrégation d'anglais en 2022

@LBRoy1986 2 жыл бұрын

Alors tu l'as eu ?

@seanlander9321 9 ай бұрын

Why was America so far behind Australia in emancipating women?

@Fandar 9 ай бұрын

Because America is the least progressive Western nation.

@CONTRACTOR_SG3 3 ай бұрын

@@FandarThe least ?

@alexchavez3244 18 күн бұрын

Because Australia only had too deal with aboriginals imagine dealing with more races like blacks and native Americans aka Hispanics or Latinos and then white Woman 😂💀

@joesatgolf4180 2 жыл бұрын

If we accept America was first to give woman the vote and New Zealand the first nation to see the sun, then if we make New Zealand great again by implementing the same political system that NZ had in. 1893, that is people vote for a regional minister then the regional ministers vote for a Prime Minister, then this will create a revolution movement where politicians come together and people pay more attention to the local area.

@Capo02110 Жыл бұрын

3:50 is CRAAAAAAZZZYYYYYYY 😂😂😂😂😂

@jerrysalgado4130 3 жыл бұрын

POV: your in mr Perron class doing this work

@max_b0250 3 жыл бұрын

Yes I'm totally in that class

@ivanos_95 Жыл бұрын

The whole idea of voting is quite new, considering that not so long ago, all those democracies were monarchies, where often a woman, namely a queen was given the highest authority, and even after abolishment of monarchy, and introduction of republicanism, there was no such thing as one vote per individual. The only reason for changing from one vote per family to one vote per individual, and questioning the traditional role of man as the head of a family, was to weaken the family, by turning the wife and the husband against each other, and giving the power to children, who are the easiest to manipulate, and lack the social responsibility.

@Fandar Жыл бұрын

"one vote per family" is just a way of sugarcoating reality back then

@ivanos_95 Жыл бұрын

@@Fandar The problem with transition from monarchy to republicanism was a poor legal-system in general, but the idea of one vote per family is still supreme to one vote per individual, and my point is, that changing this specific rule was a mistake.

@jackjohnson6230 11 ай бұрын

@@Fandar women playing the victim sugar coats the female privileges then and now

@Vi_Vi479 Ай бұрын

The things you say are so bad. 1. Yes, the monarchy is old thing, but it got destroyed and for better. People aren't subjects of "any majesty", each individual is valued and is the purpose. Human isn't belonging of king, nation or state. If you want to live in old style, than get rid off all the modern goods and achievements of medicine. Shame there won't be nobleman to whom you belong and do agricultural work for him. And your words about queens - firstly, woman in monarchy becomes leader only if: a. her king-husband lost life so she is regent until heir grows up or b. king had no sons, so daughter had to inherit throne. Secondly, commoners women have life very different from queens, don't you think? 2. Idea of "one vote per family" is immoral and keeps back a lot of stuff. The smallest unit of humanity is human, not family, and human is ultimate value. If there is disagreement in the family how to vote, who does this predicament resolve in your dystopia? Exactly, the man chooses for everyone while woman is deprived of right to say. Woman submits and made to be silent, her opinion, views and desires do not matter. "One vote for family" is bla-bla-bla, family isn't something conscious to have opinion, "one vote for man and zero votes for women" - that is what it really means. It's not family vote, it's exactly man's vote. And also that anti-suffragee propaganda that "woman can either double or null her husband's vote" is so bad. Husband has nothing to do about it, woman votes individually and by herself, and same thing husband does. Why not "husband can double wife's vote or null it?" Exactly, because woman was treated as inferior. 3. "questioning the traditional role of man as the head of a family" - okay, but are there any cons? I am glad that both partners are equal and both have right in determening how their family lives provided that it touches lives both of them. 4. "by turning the wife and the husband against each other" - lie No.2 .If treating all human beings equally and giving everyone, including women, equal rights is the way how your family and society collapses then these family and society deserve destruction AND replacement with better ones. Nobody turns man and woman against each other. If they are both happy from marriage, treat both each other with respect . see individual in each other and even better if they share similar values, then progressivists have never intended to destroy such families. What you really mean here is that woman must be quiet and obedient drone and if husband says, she must quietly obey, if husband's abusive, she must clench teeth and endure. What did egalitarianism do? It declared that not only man deserves to be happy in marriage (and happy about life in general), but also woman, and that both men and women deserve to have standards about their partner. Instead of dark past where woman hasn't right to possess bank account if she urgently doesn't find husband with whom she feels bad but it's the only way to get some human rights. So i sincerely belive that if partner feels that this marriage is ruining him/her, turning his life into something hopeless, if he/she doesn't feel respected in this marriage , then for everyone's blessing just divorce. And even without fault - if someone is unhappy in marriage, though it is sad, it is even more wrong to enforce stay there. If you are unhappy, then just leave it. 5. "giving the power to children" - a. children don't have right to vote or engage in politics. b. parents can also be sometimes manipulative, abusive and make their lives bad, the fact you had sex one day doesn't mean you are very wise. c. what exactly "power of children" means to you? Right to choose where he/she will work after graduating school? Which outschool activities he/she wants to engage in? Having individuality? d. some old-schoolers want to reduce marriage age And also i am man. So why do i even have these beliefs? Because there are things that i dream to achieve, certain ways how i want to live my life without asking anyone's opinion, ideas whom i want to marry and be able to participate in law-making since these laws influence me. The most fundamental moral rule in almost all cultures is: "Don't treat others the way you don't want to be treated yourself" So if i have all these aspirations, i can conclude that other human beings have these aspirations too. That women have these aspirations too. And while some women want traditional family and being stay-at-home mothers, there are also lots of women who dream to achieve good career and some are even trying science. Or other achievements beyond family. So we have no rights to deprive them from it. And yes, i also belive that if woman sees man in threatening situation, she must also do what's in her power to save him. Let's be just humans to each other. Every human being deserves human rights and deserves to live his/her life how he/she finds it true. Everyone deserves to engage in law-making if it impacts them, influence social ideas which may impact them or others. Remember this once and forever. People like you is the reason why some of women are still fearful of men and i can understand.

@MalcSkizz 5 ай бұрын

Fighting for all these rights then now fighting to be a stay at home mom is just manipulation at its finest

@peachyk33n79 4 ай бұрын

@MalcSkizz how about letting women choose how they want to live their lives, and if they can afford to stay home with the kids, that doesn't automatically mean she should give up the right to choose. We are not PROPERTY, so why should we have to live our lives according to a man's say-so?

@OscarKk-h5u 9 ай бұрын

Vous avez un chat noir 🐈‍⬛ et un bakakakaakaak führer et un 1️⃣ et un petit chat qui 😅malgré zoom 🏎️ ne peut fonctionne que beaucoup mieux bdfiv byteu mais il ne marche pas

@romibajwa7153 2 жыл бұрын

Now I am going to watch a documentary on abortion rights in America.

@withallduerespeck 2 жыл бұрын

Is it true that women were given the chance to vote in America and turned it down? because in order to vote they had to enroll in selective service like the men

@jackjohnson6230 2 жыл бұрын

+ Thee Kenny Bee yes it is true that was fair enough to be that way whereas now days feminism = hypocrites they want the rights but not the responsibilities and consequences that come with those rights

@Sophia-ix2ri Жыл бұрын

No. In fact it was somewhat the other way around. The right to vote for women gained ground after some women fought in the war voluntarily and the US appreciated that. I will say that often when progressive women fight for rights, conservative women express fear that those rights would mean mandatory selective service for women too. That has yet to be true. I do hear arguments today for removing gender requirements for selective service, but it's not *linked* to other rights women have or want.

@josephenis6161 10 ай бұрын

Lord God, Please let me repent my sins. I was blind. I did not see the light.

@deboss1638 6 ай бұрын

Womp womp world was better when they did not vote

@Kooperswetdick 5 ай бұрын

No it wasn’t.

@CONTRACTOR_SG3 3 ай бұрын

@@Kooperswetdick it was

@Fandar Ай бұрын

Would you really want to live before 1920 vs now? Do you know what it was like?

@deboss1638 Ай бұрын

@@FandarLive in a moral society? yes.

@Vi_Vi479 Ай бұрын

@@deboss1638 Moral society? The fundamental law of morality in all cultures is: "Do not treat others in ways that you would not like to be treated" . What you want is half of humanity being treated as inferior people. While one people are allowed to vote for laws that make impact on them too, to live their lives in any way it makes them happy as long as they are capable to carry it's hardships, to own properties and bank account. While second half of humanity has to keep mouth shout and obey their husband in everything even if his demands feel repuslive, and sometimes even endure abuse. Because like you are severly deprived in quality of life if unmarried. I don't think you'd like to be repeated all the time that you are inferior to others. So please, if your dream society is the one which violates such a fundamental principle, don't teach us morality.

@josephenis6161 10 ай бұрын

Lord God, I am blind, help me see. I feel satans presence but I can not see him.

@ryankempf1544 Жыл бұрын

I’m watching this as a non binary person

@EvanMeadows-x8e 9 ай бұрын

read this 100111010101010100101

@dawnsusan9878 8 ай бұрын

No-one is nonbinary. That's nonsense.

@Nomeuno10 Жыл бұрын

Lesbians ? or confused?

@rajendradangi2585 4 ай бұрын

It's about American women!!! Not all