Love how you bookended this with Dessa's "Sound the Bells." She's an I C O N to me lol Also thanks for this great lens into the suffrage movement! Interesting to hear the story from Minnesota.
@davidstevenson95175 ай бұрын
New Zealand was THE first country where women enjoyed emancipation, in 1893, nearly 130 years ago. 🇳🇿👧📦
@healingv1sion2 жыл бұрын
4:15 in 2006 when I was 18 years old I was chosen to sit on a jury and the judge and the defense and the prosecution try to kick me off the jury but I stood my ground. I was on the jury for 2 days
@Art4ArtsSakeVideo5 ай бұрын
Truly excellent and informative documentary at its best. Well done, Twin Cities PBS. And women, pay attention: those hard-won rights -- especially the right to vote -- are at risk of erosion everywhere in our nation in 2024. Stand up, register, and vote!
@adelexia1719 ай бұрын
(ill delete later working on history)) ,, so timestamps are easier to navigate :') 1. (3:19) When were women given the right to own property? 2. (5:06) Most historians credit the origin of the Women’s Suffrage Movement to who? 3. (11:10) What term do political scientists use to explain black women being excited for black men earning the right to vote? 4. (13:50) What does Julia B Nelson mean as the idea of freedom being “intersectional?” 5. (17:50) Why did women in the 1870’s go on crusades to local bars and establishments? 6. (22:53) Dr Ripley said her duty was to: 7. (34:21) What was the name of Nellie Francis’ radical and groundbreaking speech? 8. (37:35) What were a vast number of Native people reminded of when they think about the suffrage movement? 9. (46:20) How were picketing women, fighting for their rights, treated? 10. (50:30) What did the letter that Harry Burn’s received say? 11. (50:48) What was the official day the 19th Amendment became a law? 12. (53:45) What year was the Voting Rights Act passed? How many years after Women’s Suffrage?
@pgpc6448 Жыл бұрын
I certainly met more diverse leaders of our historical past in this video piece! Very impressive Minnesota!!
@JLS6132 жыл бұрын
It would have been nice to show all the women of different races who fought as well, more specifically Ida B. Wells.
@bertdaggler4837 Жыл бұрын
woke documentary but not woke enough. why not make your own?
@JLS613 Жыл бұрын
@@bertdaggler4837 1. I don't use or go by the term "woke" unless I'm referring to sleep. 2. I enjoyed the documentary but it only showed a quarter of the women who made strides for us. I was expecting to learn a lot more about unsung heroes from all backgrounds that I didn't know, or wasn't as familiar with. 3. I feel the same way when I watch a March On Washington documentary and it only highlights MLK and main speakers, but not any of the background organizers. Im also guilty of being a little upset that StarLords and Gamora's background is heavily covered on Guardians of the Galaxy, but we don't know much on the other crew members. 4. Its my party and I can cry if I want to.
@katherinenyberg78913 жыл бұрын
Absolutely Brilliant! I really appreciate and enjoyed all that I learned!
@thomasduggan87553 жыл бұрын
VERY INTRESTING BEST WISHES FROM MANCHESTER ENGLAND ❤️
@ozadicognizant6670 Жыл бұрын
This was very interesting I am glad women are allowed to vote
@jackjohnson6230 Жыл бұрын
as long as women have the responsibility that comes with being able to vote aka being drafted and going to war
@sfridisow185 Жыл бұрын
@@jackjohnson6230 WHY ARE YOU SO OBSESSED WITH GOING TO WAR?!! CAN YOU JUST SHUT UP?!!
@jkinder1982 Жыл бұрын
@@jackjohnson6230Are you saying that even men who are unfit to be drafted (disabled, too old, etc.) should not be allowed to vote?
@jackjohnson6230 Жыл бұрын
@@jkinder1982 when men were young they could be and were drafted for true equality women should be the same not sure about the disabled
@trollnerd10 ай бұрын
@@jackjohnson6230 Military service has never been a requirement for voting rights in the USA. This is a post-hoc rationalization for why women shouldn't have the right to vote as it's not something that was actually considered at the time when voting rights were being expanded.
@blinkbones32362 жыл бұрын
POV : tu passes l'agrégation d'anglais en 2022
@LBRoy1986 Жыл бұрын
Alors tu l'as eu ?
@seanlander93216 ай бұрын
Why was America so far behind Australia in emancipating women?
@Fandar5 ай бұрын
Because America is the least progressive Western nation.
@CONTRACTOR_SG38 күн бұрын
@@FandarThe least ?
@MalcSkizz2 ай бұрын
Fighting for all these rights then now fighting to be a stay at home mom is just manipulation at its finest
@peachyk33n79Ай бұрын
@MalcSkizz how about letting women choose how they want to live their lives, and if they can afford to stay home with the kids, that doesn't automatically mean she should give up the right to choose. We are not PROPERTY, so why should we have to live our lives according to a man's say-so?
@jerrysalgado41302 жыл бұрын
POV: your in mr Perron class doing this work
@max_b02502 жыл бұрын
Yes I'm totally in that class
@Capo02110 Жыл бұрын
3:50 is CRAAAAAAZZZYYYYYYY 😂😂😂😂😂
@joesatgolf4180 Жыл бұрын
If we accept America was first to give woman the vote and New Zealand the first nation to see the sun, then if we make New Zealand great again by implementing the same political system that NZ had in. 1893, that is people vote for a regional minister then the regional ministers vote for a Prime Minister, then this will create a revolution movement where politicians come together and people pay more attention to the local area.
@ivanos_9510 ай бұрын
The whole idea of voting is quite new, considering that not so long ago, all those democracies were monarchies, where often a woman, namely a queen was given the highest authority, and even after abolishment of monarchy, and introduction of republicanism, there was no such thing as one vote per individual. The only reason for changing from one vote per family to one vote per individual, and questioning the traditional role of man as the head of a family, was to weaken the family, by turning the wife and the husband against each other, and giving the power to children, who are the easiest to manipulate, and lack the social responsibility.
@Fandar10 ай бұрын
"one vote per family" is just a way of sugarcoating reality back then
@ivanos_9510 ай бұрын
@@Fandar The problem with transition from monarchy to republicanism was a poor legal-system in general, but the idea of one vote per family is still supreme to one vote per individual, and my point is, that changing this specific rule was a mistake.
@jackjohnson62307 ай бұрын
@@Fandar women playing the victim sugar coats the female privileges then and now
@user-jv1qv9bf1r5 ай бұрын
Vous avez un chat noir 🐈⬛ et un bakakakaakaak führer et un 1️⃣ et un petit chat qui 😅malgré zoom 🏎️ ne peut fonctionne que beaucoup mieux bdfiv byteu mais il ne marche pas
@deboss16383 ай бұрын
Womp womp world was better when they did not vote
@KooperswetdickАй бұрын
No it wasn’t.
@CONTRACTOR_SG38 күн бұрын
@@Kooperswetdick it was
@withallduerespeck2 жыл бұрын
Is it true that women were given the chance to vote in America and turned it down? because in order to vote they had to enroll in selective service like the men
@jackjohnson6230 Жыл бұрын
+ Thee Kenny Bee yes it is true that was fair enough to be that way whereas now days feminism = hypocrites they want the rights but not the responsibilities and consequences that come with those rights
@Sophia-ix2ri Жыл бұрын
No. In fact it was somewhat the other way around. The right to vote for women gained ground after some women fought in the war voluntarily and the US appreciated that. I will say that often when progressive women fight for rights, conservative women express fear that those rights would mean mandatory selective service for women too. That has yet to be true. I do hear arguments today for removing gender requirements for selective service, but it's not *linked* to other rights women have or want.
@romibajwa7153 Жыл бұрын
Now I am going to watch a documentary on abortion rights in America.
@josephenis61616 ай бұрын
Lord God, Please let me repent my sins. I was blind. I did not see the light.
@ryankempf1544 Жыл бұрын
I’m watching this as a non binary person
@user-pb6qo9nt6x5 ай бұрын
read this 100111010101010100101
@dawnsusan98784 ай бұрын
No-one is nonbinary. That's nonsense.
@josephenis61616 ай бұрын
Lord God, I am blind, help me see. I feel satans presence but I can not see him.
@Nomeuno10 Жыл бұрын
Lesbians ? or confused?
@rajendradangi258527 күн бұрын
It's about American women!!! Not all
@HARTUROOOO6 ай бұрын
Pov:M.oclay
@firstgenchevelleman Жыл бұрын
What a disastrous decision. 😢
@Fandar Жыл бұрын
You don't even know what it was like before the 1920s and why do men like you praise the 1950s so much when it was 30 years after they got the vote?
@trollnerd10 ай бұрын
There is no logical reason to deny women the right to vote. Any reason you could possibly come up with would apply equally to at least some men.
@firstgenchevelleman10 ай бұрын
@@trollnerd the draft
@trollnerd10 ай бұрын
@@firstgenchevelleman there are many men who either are not eligible for or never needed to sign up for the draft such as men with disabilities or men who became naturalized citizens after the age of 26. In addition, the draft has never been required nor a qualification for voting at any time in our country's history. In fact if you go back to the founders' days it was really the opposite (those who were drafted were the least likely to have voting rights due to the land ownership requirement)
@firstgenchevelleman10 ай бұрын
@@trollnerd they shouldn’t vote either. Need to go back to the founding fathers days.