Transcendence & Transcendent Nothings | Sartre | Being & Nothingness

[@saurabht3540]

Thanks!

[@budzeppelin3768]

3:00 okay I'm putting a wet towel on my head

[@yazanasad7811]

Quality as the yellowness of the lemon, not separate parts, inherent to it (for zen maintenance book club) Abstracting allows to see its permanent features, and see its possibilities in the future Both concrete and abstract needed

[@yazanasad7811]

For itself temporalises time Being in itself no time. Can universalise time externally, can be seen as indifferent, undifferentiated moments. Items moving through time but not time.

[@yazanasad7811]

Totality - background against which object is different to it (not it). Enables world to be conceived for for itself and in itself to emerge

[@yazanasad7811]

Space - from the for itself that is projected externally? Space a moving relation between unrelated objects.

[@yazanasad7811]

Again number - projected from from itself. The differentiation of objects is the number in the world, not actually linked to abstract numbers

[@yazanasad7811]

Avoiding realism and idealism. Knowledge as awareness of for itself linked to in itself through negation

[@zailanumu7596]

❤

[@kerycktotebag8164]

transcendent nothings reminds me of The Real (Lacan). idk why it does, have to think on it

[@SingularityasSublimity]

the more I work through Sartre’s thought the more convergences I discover between them!