Trent Horn - Do the rights of a mother outweigh the rights of the baby in her womb?

[@zaviusfirerave]

Even after all that he still doesn't see his error. Well, he sounded like he just tried to validate himself through his "logical" arguments.

[@larkbird9247]

Throughout the ages, much that has been legal has been evil. So, to me, that abortion is legal means nothing to me.

[@ellahope6494]

Where is the man is this with out him no child or pregnancy he should marry and care for them both Honorable. He only used woman for his lust not love or commitment.

[@KevZen2000]

Abortion is mainly a question of biology. 1. Does a fetus have enough of a consciousness, and the requirements of being a "human" as we understand it? 2. At what point does it become a "human?" 3. What standard defines this? Is it because of religious or secular authority? Does Science play any role in the conclusion? Is it based upon pseudoscientific ideas? 4. Why isn't other means of conception, which fail to lead to birth, such as a miscarriage considered death? These are some of the basic questions to ask, if one wishes to analyze this matter properly.

[@Dhorpatan]

The rhetoric about the 11 month abortion is utterly fallacious. That is a dishonest misrepresentation of the concept of abortion. Abortion by definition is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy. Thus you cannot have such a thing as an 11 month abortion since as Horn defines it, that person would be outside the womb and an abortion by definition is of a being inside the womb. That is just a self-serving term by Pro-lifers to finagle the argument of why would an 11 month abortion be wrong, but a 4 month abortion be OK, since if I remember correctly, Trent Horn doesn't see any difference between abortion and infanticide. 11 month abortion is just dishonest rhetoric and a misrepresentation of what abortion means.