SiOnyx Opsin: Digital Night Vision HAS ARRIVED

[@Ghost-Actual]

We miss the trex talks

[@brewer6338]

Fr man

[@isaacbotkintrex]

They still exist! The podcast has continued even though the livestreams are dead.

[@SMDaboobity]

Listen to the podcast

[@John-xo6dq]

@@SMDaboobity where are they uploaded? I can't seem to find new ones on the channel.

[@GearWithGabe]

@@John-xo6dq they’re uploaded to Spotify and Apple Podcasts as audio only podcasts

[@robsdeviceunknown]

Your content has always been my favorite. You sover everything we NEED to know other than firearms. There is a million and 1 gun channels. Only 1 you that i have found.

[@James-C24]

Hard to believe its been that long since the first video was uploaded.

[@mynameisjeff4511]

Very well done. Bring back trex talks

[@miroslavmajer5155]

aaaaaah, whenever I see you in front of the camera, I know that there will be some awesome information shared with viewers. Nothing agains Luke, he is PRO in his field. But I like more video content made by you. Again, nothing agains Luke.

[@deltashot5608]

Can you just take a camera unit from a smartphone that has a night camera and hook it up to a tiny screen?

[@possibly_a_retard]

The Chad 'budget' setup seems to be a dual tube setup with one pvs-14 over your shooting eye and a digital (opsin) over the other. You get extra color information, overlay info, and the ability to see deeper into IR. And that's now. Nevermind 3-5 years when new features like thermal fusion and augmented reality overlays arrive.

[@DevDog67]

Can't imagine the weight of that setup on your neck. Would be horrible.

[@possibly_a_retard]

@@DevDog67 Two equivalently weighted tubes and an 11oz pack to power the digital on the back for balance isn't really outside the norm. I don't get where you're coming from. Care to walk me through it?

[@DevDog67]

@@possibly_a_retard what I'm saying is one pvs14 will make your neck pretty sore over a long period of time wearing it. Bridging two pvs14s is known to be pretty heavy and not comfortable for wearing a long time - I think this would be similar to that.

[@possibly_a_retard]

@@DevDog67 Well, the combo is significantly less expensive than a pvs-31 setup. Which I never really checked the weight difference on. I call it a budget option for a reason. But I can see where you're coming from if it really does exceed a weight threshold, in which case I can understand why there are those who are waiting on digital to meet or exceed analogue rather than merely augment it at lower cost.

[@D_S_88]

TREX LABS? Totally dig this segment. Issac, as always, you're appreciated.

[@limasierraone7107]

This

[@UnboundSpirit2]

sounds like tarkov DLC

[@ajamico]

I appreciate your you’re

[@UncleDon226]

Reminds me of carburetors vs EFI. Carburetors had decades of refinement, and early throttle body injection was horrible. But within 10-15 years, EFI was superior in almost every way. I see digital night vision following a similar trend. I hope it really takes off and the market gets flooded with analog devices so I can finally afford one.

[@mmgr2k196]

Solid comparison

[@woodsghost9088]

Within your comment is a hidden reality. As long as analog is out there, it will be expensive because people like you and me will want it.

[@UncleDon226]

@@woodsghost9088 yeah :(

[@newguy954]

@@woodsghost9088 technology eventually trickles down,such was the case for lcd screens,those who adapt to change will prosper,just look at sharp it used to adapt newer technology and was the industry leader now its a shadow of its former self kzbin.info/www/bejne/rXyak3qaisicmK8

[@elesjuan]

Except... One thing. Warm air through a carb venturi, once the air molecules start to pick up the now agonizing fuel, something happens.. Something that efi can't do; remove heat from the air. Engine masters has tested a lot of this, and I too as a big efi guy, was surprised to learn some of the interesting advantages of a carb.

[@noahhastings6145]

"I could see police departments, detectives, and forensic investigators really liking the ability to differentiate between colors" - T-rex Arms out of context, 2023

[@SamSung-jn5fi]

I don't need a PVS14 to see what you did there

[@sway696]

@@SamSung-jn5fi 🤣🤣🤦‍♂️

[@AspenSavage]

😅

[@xen3534]

It’s about time they do 😅

[@KS-yg9jr]

That actually explains why more White people are killed per year by law enforcement, because they are easily seen in the dark.

[@texasranger24]

A 43 minute review/comparison video that is not boring, not redundant, not repetitive and doesn't go off topic. Not something that many people can produce. Great job. And my future wish list is kind of the same. Use the economy of scale to fight the high cost barrier to entry, thus exploring new markets. Integrate phones, watches, GPS, Kestrel, ATAK and make it play Doom. Integrate thermal, mm wave radar and laser weapons. Create a user friendly way to enter and also scale your night vision capabilities.

[@WilliamEllison]

Integrating different technologies and making night vision more accessible and user-friendly are certainly areas of potential growth for the industry. As the technology continues to advance and become more widely available, there may be opportunities to explore new markets and find innovative uses for digital night vision. However, integrating weapons and creating a way to enter night vision capabilities still raises ethical and safety concerns that would need to be carefully considered.

[@samuelhorowitz5029PLUMBCRAZY]

The overlay of thermal and digital would be perfect! But just having the that GPS map fusion thing you did would be a huge improvement

[@jarodphillips1249]

The Cat S60, S61, and S62 (pro versions) do it for phones (intended for industrial trades). They're pretty rugged and work quite well. The visual light camera is not great at low light though.

[@TechnoMinarchist]

ENVGs already have said overlays

[@PolenarTactical]

Great video!

[@DontDoDaylight]

YES! Thanks for this video. I’m very interested in the OPSIN and the future of digital in general. Many people in my comments tell me that it’s crazy to think that digital will be the future of night vision. I’m not decided but find digital to be fascinating!

[@sway696]

I want both. 🤣🤷🏽‍♂️ let's put it this way. Night vision has become completely relevant and not just in the military scenario. If you don't have it, you are at a disadvantage.

[@coltonowens2742]

People insisting digital isn't the future are delusional. You CAN'T squeeze any more performance out of that antiquated, obnoxious, anti DIY friendly analog technology. Its been peaked for years.

[@MegaDman34]

@@coltonowens2742 bruh there’s literally been constant improvement in analog NV technology since it’s inception, just because you haven’t been paying attention doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened. Gen 3 is widely available with Gen 4 on its way. We’ve seen the rise of dual tube and now quad tubes with AIB about to cut the price of quads in half. Guess we know you’ve never used modern NVG though because only a dumbass would compose such an uninformed comment.

[@stillenacht8518]

Digital is likely the future of everything. It's just a matter of time. Eventually we will get light amplifying digital tech, and once that happens there is zero reason to chose analog.

[@bigredwolf6]

@@stillenacht8518 Besides cost because everyone will be dumping their old stuff

[@amschind]

This is clearly the future. The two main issues which need to be addressed are spectrum and form factor. The spectrum doesn't go deep enough into the IR range, and that limits it vs a standard intensifier tube and thermal overlay. I fully expect this to improve with iterations. The form factor is more of an open question, but it is also theoretically easier to improve. The current device looks like a PVS-14 because all of the potential users already have a PVS-14, know how to attach it to themselves, and globally know how to use one. A camera, processor and screen setup has no excuse for sticking out from one's face like a tactical unicorn because the physics that require all of the components of an intensifier based NVD to form a line between the viewed object and the user's eye don't exist for a digital device. I can't see this really taking off until the camera mounts to the helmet, the battery mounts on the user's torso (no need for a helmet counterweight if you aren't a tactical unicorn), and the screen is easily moved into and out of the user's field of view. That adds the additional value of the screen being potentially source agnostic, such that a weapon mounted camera can be toggled in place of the helmet mounted camera (i.e. push a button to exchange your X eye view from the helmet mounted view to the "scope" view). Reaching even farther into the future, consider the "mandible" that OpsCore offers for their helmets. A rifle-rated face plate (i.e. a "mandible" with no hole for the user's eyes) with screens on the inside and cameras on the outside could offer level III protection to a user's entire head and face. Oddly, battery life is probably not an issue because moving that weight from the head to the torso dramatically reduces the impact of those extra ounces.

[@WilliamEllison]

Your observations regarding the future of digital night vision technology are intriguing. It's clear that there are many opportunities for improvement, both in terms of image quality and in terms of design and form factor. Improving the range of the IR spectrum and making the technology more compact and versatile could greatly increase its appeal to a wider range of users. The concept of integrating digital night vision with helmets, weapons, and other wearable devices could offer many advantages, such as increased mobility and ease of use. The ability to switch between different sources of image input, such as helmet-mounted and weapon-mounted cameras, could greatly enhance situational awareness and overall effectiveness in the field. Battery life is indeed an important consideration, and the potential to reduce the weight and impact of batteries by moving them to the torso is a promising idea. Overall, it's exciting to imagine the future possibilities for digital night vision technology, and it will be interesting to see how these ideas develop and evolve in the coming years.

[@amschind]

@@WilliamEllison Sorry, I wasn't clear on what I meant by "battery life isn't an issue." My point is that while battery life obviously matters a great deal, with head mounted batteries the size of the battery pack is severely weight constrained. With a remote battery pack attached to some body part that is far less sensitive to extra ounces (or even pounds) than the head, the energy efficiency of the device matters less because you can simply throw a larger battery pack at the problem.

[@weasle2904]

A multi sensor setup would be a pretty easy way to improve the spectrum and sensitivity. Having multiple sensors tuned for specific ranges of wavelengths are more effective than a sensor collecting a very wide range. We already have algorithms that combine images with low latency. Sort of like how our phones have multiple cameras for different purposes, but those are pretty overhyped in what they actually do. Seems way more useful as a way to create a super high quality digital NV setup, and it's totally feasible. Improve the battery life with OLED screens and newer ARM processors, and mount the battery pack in your ruck sack instead of your helmet.

[@JediSwordMasters]

@@WilliamEllison your comment sounds like a chatGPT response to me

[@burberry74]

Thanks for the update on digital night vision. Looking forward to more advancements and affordability in years to come.

[@death31313]

It would be really interesting to see a comparison between the digital night vision and a modern gen2 device like the Wolf monocular. Gen 2 night vision is right on the edge of usability, so it may be a more fair comparison.

[@AnvilAirsoftTV]

Good gen2+ tubes are better. Not so good (Russian) are pretty similar if a bit worse.

[@nighthawk2174]

Seems like a product to check up on in 2-3 years. Seems super promising that future iterations will be even better.

[@miked7134]

Definitely do not stop this type of content.

[@ArgosySpecOps]

3:21 in a place where the people are running around with yellow/blue, and red arm bands to identify friend from foe it's worth the extra price for color night vision.

[@mr-huggy]

@TREXARMS Here's how you can test latency. You have a camera that has a high speed recording function like 1000 frames per second. You then have the camera looking into the scope and also have seeing outside the scope. You then turn a light on and you count the frames it appears outside the scope until it appears in the scope, so like at 1000 fps 40 frames would be 40ms latency.

[@vicranger6876]

As a medevac pilot , we used helmet mounted binocular night vision with battery pack on back of our helmets to balance the weight and we were told $14 k for our sets . They were great , but we had to keep track of “ on time” . We would swap out for new batteries at 2 hr . The specs said the processor gave 80k light magnification as I recall. No matter how dark, we could see great. Some ground guys were getting fusion which gave one side thermal and the other night vision so your brain ended up combining the two images. The French had a five scope systems on top of their helmet which gave processor info display on a shield visor flip down from the helmet. A wire would illuminate orange in the display, which as a pilot we thought that was really great.

[@WilliamEllison]

That sounds like an interesting setup you used as a medevac pilot. Night vision technology has come a long way over the years, and the integration of different sensors like thermal imaging into a single device provides a more comprehensive view of the environment. The ability to swap out batteries on the go and keep track of "on time" is also an important consideration for maintaining the functionality of the system. It's fascinating to see how different countries are incorporating these advancements into their equipment. It's important to note that light magnification is not the same as image magnification. Night vision devices don't actually magnify light, but rather amplify available light to create an image. The number you're referring to is likely the "light gain" of the device, which is a measure of how much the device amplifies available light to create an image. A gain of 80,000 means that the device can amplify light 80,000 times, allowing the user to see in low light conditions that would otherwise be too dark to see in. However, this number can be misleading and doesn't always accurately reflect the real-world performance of the device.

[@mikehawkslong5529]

I like that there is a company that is still a company and needs to make money but does it in an ethical way and tries to do it's part to inform and educate you and nor just steal your money on shitty shit that they wouldn't buy themselves

[@verysmallcats1374]

Really liking the T-REX Labs. Gotta love the comparisons.

[@romeotango5597]

It’s going to be really interesting to see the future of this tech. While sensitivity is clearly lacking especially in lower light conditions, the contrast of the color sensor makes up for it in moderate lume. One thing that sucks about things like PVS-14s is that certain things get washed out as a result of just how it is displaying what’s in front of you. I tend to pop my thermal overly when making movements to see if there’s any terrain that might not show well under NV that might trip me up. I’ve seen guys fall in holes that just didn’t show up under NV but we’re much easier to see with the thermal sensor, saving my ankles and knees a good deal of pain.

[@lhp2a]

I really hope some dude in an optic company watched the last 10 minutes of this video and decided to get rich off that free advice.

[@medikpac7105]

@@lhp2a Don't worry, they're paying attention ;)

[@lhp2a]

@@medikpac7105 praise the lord.

[@すどにむ]

To measure latency quick and easy, you can show a running stopwatch to the device under test, and photograph both the watch and the device display. If the watch in the picture is showing 1:23.456 and the watch in the device display is showing a time in the past, e.g. 1:23.256, that suggest the display is 0.200s late. Note, some cameras has rolling shutter effect and might not be taking complete picture at exact same moment so you might have to flip and rotate camera to get around that, also if you'd use a phone as the running stopwatch there might be issues like it might only update at 60Hz or half the screen at a time etc., so real watches are recommended.

[@DjAlonDevil]

Opsin is definitely rolling shutter

[@すどにむ]

@@DjAlonDevil no you photograph the opsin looking at a stopwatch, with the stopwatch seen in the background. That way you can compare what's displaying at the back end of opsin and the stopwatch. But if both are too apart in the direction of rolling, shenanigans could kick in

[@DjAlonDevil]

@@すどにむ I understand, I just wanted to say that Opsin is a rolling shutter and not a global one.

[@WalrusWinking]

If you use a stopwatch on a phone app wouldn't the screen refresh rate also effect that. Someone with a 90hz screen could get a different result than someone with a 60hz.

[@すどにむ]

yup, resolution will be 1000[ms] / 60[Hz] = 16.67ms or half that or something, it'll be something akin to 3MOA accuracy but it'll be a start

[@jimmyofthesea1883]

I thought about the Arora last year when I got my PVS14..... Glad I went with the PVS14, but its real cool that digital is making advancements. I'd like to see helmet mounted sensors with slim displays and a cable attaching it to a pack. Like you can have all the vision of a tank's thermal with IR and the weight will not be on your neck.

[@Harpuea]

I didn't expect to watch a 40 mins long NVG video which I don't even need. Very good and informative content.

[@JustinPBarnett]

As someone who develops VR applications, 90 fps is the standard minimum for your brain to actually sync up with your eyes and not cause motion sickness.

[@damascusmedicalllc3342]

I have not had a chance to review all the comments as of yet. Question. Thoughts on the Opsin for Tactical Medicine and low light Medicine applications? Being able to appreciate color will assist with patient assessment. As well as an excellent training tool for low light environments

[@PattyDung]

On the Opsin, always set the EV to -2.5 which greatly improves dynamic range (~no wash out of bright lights). The Opsin battery system sucks. It's always drawing 6 milliamps when OFF. Weird.

[@Mrgunsngear]

Facts

[@12ealDealOfficial]

I am one of those guys who got some Nightfox thermals and put them on a bump helmet. These are three things I learned were most important. 1) Zero latency. 2) True 1x magnification. 3) Legitimate helmet compatibility without workarounds. I thought the thermal capacity was fairly limited, especially in pure black, but something that is a mild improvement can be rendered useless if it's plain painful to actually use.

[@UFC_Buffalo]

Bro, the Opsin is what, $2595.00?.... What's the point? Just save up another couple bucks and get legit PVSs. If this joint was like $500, we'd be talking a different story.

[@bennyboy27or]

If the opsin was much cheaper, I think they would be everywhere. I also wonder why they didn't add an integrated ir illuminater with that "not-visisible to anolog" spectrum. I currently use an araura with an illuminater as an observation device, it is basically useless without the illuminater

[@NavySooner]

A low end Gen 3 PVS-14 is going to perform better at the same price.

[@destroyerofgear]

17:00 ish re: burning tubes out, this is where insurance is a godsend. My collectible insurance is great and my policy covers my intensifier tubes even from accidental damage (I have it in writing from an underwriter and explicitly in my policy). If you're using them for business use, I'm sure you can find a carrier writing inland marine policies to write you a policy. For insurance on my DTNVS alone I think I pay about 70 bucks a year. I would not feel comfortable attending large NV and night MilSim events and or using my full power lasers unless I had some assurance that if the 15 grand of (somewhat) delicate equipment on my head gets destroyed by my own or someone else's stupidity, I won't be totally fucked.

[@mjolnirdynamics8789]

I think Lucas is a good guy, who cares about the 2A, especially here in the Volunteer state. However, I've seen all of the high-speed shooting vids I care to see. Not just from him, from anybody. I'm really enjoying your reviews of accessories and tech and getting more useful info on kit I'm curious about. All of that being said, I do still dig some of the review vids that Lucas does. The one on the Aero M5 was fantastic info IMO and I'm always in the market for more capable optics. So, I keep an eye out for those. Thank you all for your work.

[@BullsMahunny]

Lucas's thing is all about training and skills. That's his lane. It's good that TRex has multiple lanes.

[@flyboymike111357]

I can see this becoming a standard on cars and commercial vehicles. Regular headlights will still be a thing if course. But a nice little AR HUD that could display digital NV, or daylight camera footage for when the sun gets low can obviously make roads a bit safer after dawn, before dusk, and would make a decent replacement for hi-beams.

[@TRINITYIMPERAT]

Thanks a lot guys for this type of content, very appreciated.

[@seanazpeitia3023]

Oh goodie! Issac video's are fast becoming my favorites on here! I cannot say enough good about the "Why Everyone Needs an AR-15" one you did. We need more of that

[@dak4465]

All im gonna say is: any nvgs are better than no nvgs

[@enigma6482]

I got my Sionyx Pro new on eBay a year ago for $450.00 and you can now find the Opsin for $1,500.00.

[@andrewgable7273]

Great overview. As those have progressed forward, that Opsin is laying down a pretty solid foundation for future refinement and development. If I had the extra coin floating around, I'd get one to play with, KNOWING full well, it isn't perfect. But man when they refine it, add a thermal overlay, THAT will be pretty darn close to perfection. 180 frame rate as a minimum is a good place to start. My feeling is 200 would be spot on. Thank for this Isaac!!! Well done. Looking to the future for advancements and refinements. Later.

[@bargainbintactician]

I almost clicked away during the ending trex logo... glad I stuck around lmao "its gonna keep being fun for me" 🤣🤣

[@I_Am_Lt_Surge]

Digital will be the future of night time navigation, from the looks of this video. If digital can get to the point where, in a firefight, you aren't a sitting duck, then it will find it's place in the squad easily.

[@Dryphu]

Digital is the future because soon the thermal+infrared mesh will be standard and with possible AI intergration and HUDs showing up in more digital gear it'll be like looking through a tank sight for your head

[@shadezactual2657]

For the price point, you are better off getting a pvs-14 for $500 more

[@keenanclopez]

I think the biggest selling point of the Opsin is its range up to 1200nm, however I cannot find any illuminators above the normal 940 nm wavelength. Maybe no one makes those yet because it normally can't be seen with traditional NV?

[@TriadAgone]

I give it another 2 gens before it's worth it. I expect that once we get 120ish fps at the kind of sensitivity we need we will be in a good spot with digital NV. I've seen some good work done with simple neural nets that help reduce noise and lower the useful bottom limit of sensors in low light by predicting where an object is and reducing noise dramatically.

[@TierNoneOperator]

Cool thing about the opsin (and all digital really) is the option for upgrades through firmware/software. I bet the wizards at sionyx could up the frame rate. While analog is obviously the best option at the moment, without large expense there is no way to upgrade as new tech comes out. With digital it's just as simple as a quick software update.

[@darknature79]

There was a rumor recently that new firmware for the aurora was gonna have a redicle option. That would be awesome to not have to put the black behind a red dot.

[@AnvilAirsoftTV]

There was a big improvement in performance with the Aurora Firmware updates so there’s potential.

[@mr.lautomotive8501]

With the flir breach and the opsin being digitally operated it is only a matter of time before we see a unit that combines both.

[@willxy42dakin61]

Looking forward to having lightweight ''inexpensive'' digital GPNVG's. Great exposé!

[@yangni007]

ADNV G14P2 has arrived with super performance, will you make a comparison review against Opsin ? Thanks !

[@tgsharp1158]

Vid is a mess. Isaac, I know you're genius, but lay off the caffeine and turn on the lights. Can't tell what device he is referring to bc black devices against black background. Also, he's moving devices around like a 3-Card Monty player. And his language is inexact: E.g. 1:05 "We're going to compare the Opsin device to the Sionyx device . . . " -- they're both Sionyx devices. Then he shows graphics of other devices we're not even talking about. Still worth watching, but had to hit the REWIND constantly.

[@deltaecho8732]

Thanks for another great and informative video, even if I'm not quite ready for night vision just yet. I'm relatively new to your channel and have been going back and watching some of the older stuff. I've watched the GPS video and the older navigation video multiple times each. There's just so much great info there. Thanks for what you're doing here, and I'll be sure to patronize the store as I add and upgrade gear.

[@Purifactor]

I wish everybody could do a review this WELL DONE and informative.. maybe in 3-5 years :p

[@TierNoneOperator]

Can you imagine this thing integrating with the new magpul/maztech "aimbot"? That would change the game! Round count in your mag, heads up display, navigation, even aiming point right in the goggles.

[@musicman1eanda]

The future will be everyone running around seeing COD displays 😀😂

[@DevDog67]

@@musicman1eanda it wouldn't surprise me at all if that's what is being tested/implemented right now. A simple HUD display with useful but non-intrusive information would an asset. Garandthumb did a video on the new scope (which is brilliant) that has a built in range finder/target tracking system. And the word on the street is that the information in those scopes is able to be linked up with some new night vision headsets that have built-in thermals. That kind of capabilities would maintain the edge in night fighting/tactical superiority over other countries. Not sure when that will start to trickle down to the commerical/private market for the rest of us who aren't doing ninja things at night, but it does look very interesting.

[@sbagwell98]

NO!I will not pay $2500 for night vision, for that matter Thermal is wayyyy overpriced. I have built my own thermal scope for just under 800.00 So supply and demand is no longer there !

[@mobilegamersunite]

Oneleaf for $300 apparently works ok. Only out to 300 yards. For the price tho...i might actually try one out 😅

[@isaacbotkintrex]

First!

[@rybaneightsix5085]

Obligatory shaming for ruining $30000 in equipment: Shame! Shame! Shame! That does suck though.

[@adamneujahr7051]

I recently built my own FPV headset digital night vision using a RunCam Night Eagle 3, and it's amazing. Not quite my friend's Gen 3 White Phosphor PVS14, but it's something for now. Looking forward to seeing what all the future has to offer! Thanks for covering these topics.

[@medikpac7105]

PVS-69?

[@JackTavern629]

Can you post a KZbin video on it? I've been messing around with the nvg10 for awhile. Pretty impressive. I like the nvg 10 much more than the Opsin resolution wise. The digital pvs 69s are really dope as well

[@adamneujahr7051]

No just a Fatshark HDO2 with the night cam direct pinned to the receiver side, and emitters on the other. I like the 3d printed sets out there for durability, but more sensory isn't really needed, just more IR, and the display quality is massive on the FPV sets. Under $750 done up with a helmet setup to mount it. Good enough to part out and upgrade later budget wise as well as things improve.

[@DankSandwich]

@bLackstar I too would like more information on this so I can build my own

[@Slay_No_More]

I'm tempted to make one out of a drone NV fpv racing camera.

[@bulleit9459]

Absolutely top tier content! Thank you guys for this excellent video, as i was pondering this very choice. You have basically confirmed my decision. 👍

[@jose-xr1xv]

Good to see issac back

[@danielblackburn4626]

Great review. I think they are missing quick adjustment knob for frame rate selector, as opposed to switching within the dialogue menu. Toggle switch @ Slow to optimize light sensitivity would solve SOME low light issues, even if at the sacrifice of felt latency. Alternatively, Maybe they could add a manual mechanical lens exposure device and increase the maximum diameter to allow in more light for those low light conditions. Maybe add some concave mirrors to increase total light in take, even if only in the lens peripheral.

[@ShockAnAwe]

Was a great video until you brought the chairborn ranger into the video.

[@mattfleming86]

For ME it would be more than good enough. And the >950 thing is very very intriguing. Fix the cables and mounts in gen 2 and i'd bite. The color thing wins it for me..

[@VdubSPAZ]

Here's the test you should be trying to do this is a test that is basically something you need to see if you can identify if it is a member of your party or if it is a Charlie out in the Distance by identifying them by the clothing they are wearing as most infrared or night vision goggles just brings up a bright colored or dark colored silhouette where is does digital device may actually allow you to distinguish if a member of your team was wearing a certain particular color of clothing or maybe a particular style of camouflage could you just turn the difference at distances and what would be the distances in which you could no longer distinguish the difference verses that of a traditional high-end night vision goggles

[@PunchingCacti]

The great thing about digital NVG is it may start to bring the price of normal NVG down.

[@jonhudson685]

I got a sionyx opsin about 6 months ago. I don’t use it very often, mostly star gazing. But WoWoWoWoW is the Opsin cool.

[@TheMostSlyFox]

so, will they still be pricing it like traditional nods despite the tech being monumentally cheaper and easier to produce? Yes lol

[@007josiah]

Sure do miss this form of content from Trex Arms.

[@unstableentropy5477]

My only night vision is the one that came with call of duty Modern warfare 2019 lol. Works fine for the like 100 dollars it added to the game

[@weasle2904]

The battery weight would be solved by mounting or storing the battery on your body and not directly on your helmet. I could easily see this being strapped into a ruck sack or backpack and have a cable run up to the helmet.

[@GrahamBartle]

Is Trex still in contact with S2 Underground. Would you guys ever do an OSINT, land nav and radio workshop? Maybe through in some range time with the Aimbot.

[@inertproductionsalternate9114]

I wonder if you could do something similar to how welding hoods auto darken to protect those tubes. Of course it'd would be set for a different range of light but the principle is there.

[@kentchristen6048]

I appreciate the content, and the follow-up podcast (I listened this morning while walking the dogs) was excellent. What this told me is that I should probably pick up something relatively inexpensive and analog right now, then revisit this in about two years (assuming it doesn't all go kaput in that time). Except I'm not Lucas, so 90fps might be fast enough for me . . . .

[@Spessforce]

I wish they ditched the PVS14 form factor and went with a drone FPV goggle/IVAS design.

[@JamieR1234]

I’m also very interested in the type of development that holosun is doing combining the sensors into your red dot. I think that from a practical standpoint for the average Joe that could potentially be huge.

[@WilliamEllison]

The integration of multiple sensors into a single device can provide many benefits and make it more accessible to the average consumer. By having all the necessary features in one device, it can reduce the need for multiple devices and simplify the use. Additionally, this can also lead to more cost-effective solutions, as the cost of each individual component is spread over the combined device. With advancements in technology, it will be interesting to see how the trend towards multi-sensor devices develops in the future.

[@jimlake5404]

Enjoyed the video. Thanks. I have both an aurora and a pvs14 that I use for imaging the night sky. I want to be able to see objects in the sky that emit in the IR (all of them). I have discovered that there many of them not visible to the unaided eye. For me, the Aurora has been far superior for this task, largely because of its broad bandwidth and recording ability. Moreover the ability to tell which objects are emitting only IR has been nice. I wonder if you have tested the OPSIN for this purpose? Perhaps you might consider doing that and posting the video. Just stick it on a tripod and point it at a spot in the sky and let it record. No camera motion. Thanks again.

[@Morningstar_Actual]

Short answer: No. especially for the price, it’s fucking atrocious without illum

[@ekfinn]

Love the knowledge these dudes crank out for the masses. 🤘🏻

[@christophercerak4639]

So good night vision is still not affordable. Great video I enjoyed watching it.

[@lhp2a]

When Issac talks, I shut up and listen, fun or not. Great video.

[@JRassi_Militaria]

AGM has been offering a 640 thermal monocular with a CMOS overlay for at least a year. Pulsar has been offering a thermal biocular with CMOS overlay for a few years as well, $3k These devices are out there, but nobody is paying attention.

[@joshuabracke5775]

Digital night vision is a really cool development. The fact that ITAR isn't restricting it is a big deal...unless it gets updated, then you'll see development slow quite a bit.

[@erikbayer8851]

Finally!!! This guy again

[@jessedaly7847]

I would think the resilience to light vs analog would be absolutely invaluable in the battle space where things tend to explode and emit a lot of light.

[@Plur307]

I have spent many hours wearing VR goggles and goggles for my FPV drone. I think I have become completely immune to motion sickness induced from funky vision and latency.

[@GrahamBartle]

Sionix needed to get thermal into that thing. I say it's a killer with thermal built in and at %75 of the cost. I need to see testing on engagement of a group of three bad guys at 50 yards with sioniz vs pvs 14. I'm not running 3 gun, I'm looking to protect my quarter at night.

[@GrahamBartle]

Sorry Issac. I Hadn't finished the video yet. Thought I was a smart guy but you had it covered.

[@CyclicMac]

Audio is a bit funky

[@Nickrioblanco1]

This review is truthful, yes the truth is boring to the simple minded. But knowledge is useful, so I greatly appreciate your efforts and hope you continue produce more content based on true knowledge.

[@lolfolcopter]

Really great review. Hopefully they come out with a new version next year. I think it'll be a huge improvement

[@amrak-8401]

What a great amazing video. Thank you guys!🤓👍

[@crdowney1]

"Does it offer 3 to 4 times more value?" I think that is an improper question. Quality does not scale with price. A piece of gear twice as much will not be twice a good. Additionally, you don't have to worry about imperfections with the digital or review data sheets.

[@shapshooter7769]

It does not - those are called diminishing returns. But in the context of value, more is spent on R&D so that the quality increases which "justifies" the price - again to a point.

[@captaindookey]

Not going to lie as a teenager I put on a pair of eyeclops toy night vision goggles and trekked about 4 hours in the dark looking through one of the smallest view screens ever put on anyting. And I was still able to figure out where I was. And then we got the tacBros strapping digital night vision to their heads and getting sick.

[@iamscoutstfu]

The F35 has a system called EDAS or sometimes "DAPS" which uses sensors facing all six axes and meshes the image into a single, continuous frame which allows the Pilot to see in IR/Thermal in all directions without needing to reorient a specific sensor in whichever direction he wants to see. I think something like that could be a huge niche advantage for digital NVGs and would give the operator a 360 degree field of view with "back up cameras" and motion tracking alerts on their overlay.

[@GregAtlas]

My estimation on why they don't let you record more than 30fps is because #1 battery drain and heat generation. You were already complaining about the battery being too heavy, so making it heavier for larger capacity is likely not a viable option. Sensor or processor shutting down from overheating would also not be a viable option for what most would consider to be a secondary function. #2 dedicating the additional processing power to record could potentially affect the performance of the live viewing. Except for the heat issue and the live quality issue, I still believe it should be an option to record in higher fps even if it affects your battery life. Some people might not want or need to do long recordings where the higher drain on the battery doesn't really matter. If they wanted to do it another way, they should have a video output on the device so you can run to a Ninja V recording monitor or something. Then all of the processing power and battery power could be dedicated to the eye piece and the recorder can have its own power source in a backpack or something.

[@lnaesll]

I’ve been sitting on this information for a year under nda. You knocked the entire assessment out of the park. I won’t use it professionally but I do hope that people purchase this to bring more research money into the sector.