The New 2024 Ford Ranger is Nearly Here...Let's Tell Ford What Features it Should Have!

The redesigned Ford Ranger has already been revealed in world markets, but North Americans have to wait a little longer for the truck. While we wait, let's take a look at today's Ranger and see what Ford should change.
We have a second channel! Find it here - ‪@tkpowersports‬
Visit our website here - canadiantruckkingchallenge.ca/
Become a Truck King member - / @truckking
Buy our merch here - / @truckking
Follow us on Twitter - / truckkingchalng
Check out Steve's music channel - / @selmervidz1
#ford #trucks #ranger

[@shredfest30]

I've heard from a very reliable source that the new model will be offered with the 2.7 as well as the 4 cyl. I've also heard the manual will be a returning option as well. Now, if the manual will go behind the 2.7, then that will be a treat.

[@Red.Hot.Chili.Beans63]

Since you asked Steveo! Things that I'd like to see is a) the manual from the Bronco paired with the 2.3L engine as the base powertrain. b) 4 position transfer case 2H, AWD, 4H, 4L as an option of all trim levels. c) the 2.7L engine from the Bronco as an option on all trim levels. Those three things would be a plus for me. Also, you should talk torque at the same time you mention HP since these are trucks the torque numbers matter a lot too.

[@mabelpup8502]

Agreed. Auto 4wd is a must.. auto sliding rear window would be nice as well. 60/40 backseat and take the box outta the backseat floor! I prefer flat floor

[@ALMX5DP]

Yes, especially the base 2.3/7-speed manual combo. I think it has to be a no brainer, the Bronco is the only other vehicle they use that in (at least in NA to my knowledge) so they have to have envisioned using it in other vehicles to bolster profitability.

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

Just copy the powertrains from the Bronco 1:1.

[@Cloud30000]

The days of the manual being a base option are long past, with mass production making the automatics cheaper and the efficiency allowing bigger engines while still meeting fleet CAFE requirements. I would just be happy if it was offered as a (reasonably priced and NOT bundled) option across all models and trims of Ford vehicles with the 2.3 and 2.7L engines.

[@dmegahan]

Everyone asks for the stick except no one is buying it.

[@josephdeakyne197]

I drive a 2001 ford ranger every day 191000 miles on her couple of leaks but trust worthy

[@SyrupCanuck]

It's madding you can't get a well equipped mid size truck out the door for under 40k cad. Vehicle prices need to come back down to earth..

[@gregferris9378]

I have a 2021 Ranger XLT 4X4 Super Crew. The only thing I hope they change is the way the transmission tries to be in one gear to high. Between 25 and 45 MPH it shudders unless I put it in tow haul mode. It needs a bigger fuel tank. 18 GAL is not enough.

[@piuslebouthillier]

Gas tank realy to small

[@rodgood]

35"s are the new 33"s needs to come with large wheel opening to accommodate larger tires and a Torsen type front diff . to augment the rear locker.

[@CarnutMM]

In my opinion. If Ford makes the next gen look less Maverick and more like a pickup version of Bronco they will have a winner on their hands.

[@smittysmitty481]

This generation of Ranger is like the 40 s&w cartridge; it’s not the best at anything but it’s very good at everything

[@Redneck_Wizard]

Ranger Raptor is 10mm 😎

[@rickeycooley9139]

I like that, I own a 2018 Tacoma TRDOFF. It hasn’t had anything to go wrong yet. I think it will out last me.

[@R.Nelson]

Good morning Truck King!!! Awesome day!!

[@freeravenadventures6925]

Why does Ford, a so called "American" Auto manufacturer always seem to give the rest of the world the best versions of thier trucks and leave the USA out????

[@Redneck_Wizard]

Only good model we are missing is the Everest.

[@freeravenadventures6925]

@@Redneck_Wizard And Diesels. the Rest of the world gets them. While Americans are forced to drive turbo 4 and 6 cylinder Gassers because "America is responsible for global warming" fake news propaganda BS

[@kylemelcher894]

Because they need to have a market separation between the Ranger, light, and heavy duty F-series. They don’t want to encroach on the payload numbers of their F150 because that would mean decreased sales on their prized cash cow.

[@21halvie]

It’s because of us government regulations. They have to have a different line up that meets their rules. It’s bs. This gem truck has always looked like a girl truck. Would have been cool with the f150 front end. Just like the Colorado.

[@rowerwet]

The chicken tax, the recession in the 20 teens, and Ford almost going bankrupt. Ford is still recovering from what Nasser did to the company in the 90s, and has to guard any high profit models. Then the covid plandemic caused massive supply problems and introducing the new model would have been too hard to pull off in the north American market, especially with the EPA and safety standards here that no other market has.

[@JB-wm4fk]

Big touch screens with limited important buttons or switches is terrible and distracting. No thanks on that! I cannot wait until that trend reverses. I agree with another commenter - put the 2.7 somewhere in the lineup. Do not need an all electric version of a Ranger either just get a good PHEV option.

[@michaelb489]

They need to add a heated steering wheel. Also a tailgate damper! I got a new 2022 few months ago. I had a 2019 but ordered a new one 4/09/22. It took about 5 months to get here. The 22 i got the lariat again but this time i got the Tremor. The price on it was right at $50,000.

[@Chris-ut6eq]

A plug-in hybrid with real electric range would be a very interesting truck/power-generator. Add a 7.2Kw or 9.6Kw power inverter to power a job site and this becomes more interesting for XL/XLT trims. I don't care about luxury trucks at hyper inflated prices. Do away with trim levels and let me buy the features I want just like a Transit Cargo Van. Ford can still put their desired margins in the ala-cart menu items but I can configure the truck I need.

[@dallasfrost1996]

Where I'm from (NZ), we already have the next gen Ranger. My dad brought a Wildtrak with the 3.0L V6 Diesel. Definitely a massive improvement over the previous gen Ranger. Much nicer interior, and a lot more tech.

[@heathjohnson2575]

I love my 2020 Ranger Lariat no problems here.

[@skwerlee]

Every time Matt talks it tricks me into thinking it’s your dad talking! They sound just alike haha

[@scottrocher1388]

Please Ford put the 2.7 in the new Ranger

[@rondail5675]

Good looking truck in and out. It needs to compete with the GM 2.7L power.

[@deanmay338]

Timely video given all the videos out about the new Colorado. My plan is to buy a new mid-size or 1/2 ton truck at the end of 2024 to replace our current tow vehicle for our Casita travel trailer (2,900 lbs). The previous Colorado/Canyon was the one truck that I would NOT consider. With the redesign, it is now at the center of our radar. The current Ranger is a functional/competent mid-size truck with solid engine performance in terms of towing and hauling for a mid-size truck. However, it is dated inside and out. What do I want in a midsize truck? Tow 7,500 lbs. Payload of 1500 lbs to 1700 lbs. 300 hp. 375 lb ft of torque. Multifunction tailgate. Wishlist - the equivalent of the F150s ProPower onboard generator, midnight edition (I don’t like chrome) and a sporty look (I don’t need luxury looks in a truck). Also, I value reliability and safety. Will the new Colorado and Ranger be as reliable at the new Tacoma? Will the new Tacoma be reliable?

[@ericneal1872]

I got a '19 new in '19. Everything truck like about the Ranger is awesome. Tows amazing, hauls great, fantastic off road, but you nailed it, the interior is mediocre. Nevertheless, I've been overjoyed by my purchase. It has far exceeded my expectations. At the time I was shopping in '19, I didn't find the competitors interiors to be any better.

[@patrickmckowen2999]

Good review 👍 Should be some sweet deals 🤞🤞 on older 2023 models to move them off the lots. Cheers from Richmond Hill Ont Cheers

[@bryanlewis8891]

I like my 2022 Ranger XLT just fine. I have 2 other almost new vehicles that are much nicer than the Ranger. I bought the Ranger because it is plain and didn't cost much, by standards today. It is just what I wanted

[@JLC8504]

I have a 2021 Ranger FX4 and the only complaints I have is the transmission tries to get in the highest gear possible. I'll be driving through town at 35mph and it's in 8th gear. My second complaint I have is the small 18 gal gas tank. There's room enough under the truck for a bigger tank.

[@douglasjennings7375]

Nice looking Ranger. I have a 2020. Race Red Lariat with Chrome Package.

[@matt-3283]

Ranger is really missing the Heated Steering Wheel and a factory Tailgate Damper.

[@ghilliemanreviews]

One thing I think I’m scared of is the new one won’t have a solid steel bumper like the current gen. And that’s a real shame since that was the one one that came from the factory like that. Like how the next gen ranger raptor will come, all rangers in the USA needs to come with it.

[@izzywashington5461]

A ranger is not a ranger after 2012 if you know. You know.

[@ALMX5DP]

Yeah I expect the 2.3 as a base engine and then 2.7 and 3.0 to top the range off. Not sure what the differences are but the new Focus ST’s 2.3 engine I think is updated over what we have currently. I can see that updated mill making its way in.

[@rowerwet]

Focus is a sideways engine, ranger is an inline engine, that FWD vs RWD transmission connection means one won't fit the other.

[@ALMX5DP]

@@rowerwet you sure the blocks are a different casting? I kinda expected them to be the same for transverse and longitudinal layouts just for simplicity of production and manufacturing but not entirely sure.

[@rowerwet]

@@ALMX5DP mounts, fluid and drive belt connections will all be different, besides the obvious transmission connection. Other than components like throttle body, water pump, alternator, coil packs, I can't imagine much is the same

[@ALMX5DP]

@@rowerwet ancillary components sure but I was mostly referring to the block and internals. I believe the prior 2.3 Duratec was the same engine in the Ranger as what was found in the Focus aside from lacking a balance shaft and having a forged crankshaft. Used that as a basis that newer engine iterations would be produced similarly.

[@jrite77]

Hmm, Ranger Thunder? Wouldn't that be awesome if they somehow shoehorned the 5.0 into the engine bay? Ford is like, you called down the thunder, well now you've got it! lol

[@pzadach]

2.7 EB as an option and 4 auto would be great.

[@jimsomerville3924]

Bigger gas tank, and everything else is fine to me.

[@Bryan09876]

Seems like it’s $20,000 too much. That’s a 27,000 dollar truck, not 47,000

[@stinkburger1761]

I was thinking the same thing.

[@MichaelGalletly]

Would love to the 2.7 Ecoboost V6 as an option for the non-Raptor trims.

[@211Gus]

That interior. I don't care that it's a truck. For the prices we are looking at you can't have an interior made of Playskool plastics that are scratchy and rattle when new. The ten speed also needs to be refined. Clunky and rough shift even having been looked at by the dealership.

[@TB-dj8kl]

I don't care about how much power they produce, just make a reliable truck for those who would like to keep it beyond warranty. Even if they load these trucks up with all the horsepower, the computer limits power in the lower gears to save the drivetrain.

[@liamrobinson2084]

Amen to that! Reliability, payload, and at a reasonable starting price ( sub $30k).

[@DesertRox]

Much better looking than the new Colorado but that interior is horrendous. Pricing is insane on everything.

[@ryansheard8092]

I love the new Colorado look. Best looking mid-size on the market IMO.

[@WyLEE08]

Midsize trucks good for trails (if you run trails) and full size get the same MPG. Not in to bumping elbows so I’ll take a full-size for the money.

[@danatkinson6698]

I'm glad I got my 5th gen ranger, and im glad I got it pre pandemic as its actually well equipped. Not totally digging the new design and switch to more digital controls.

[@fastfairlane3677]

First, I would like to see class leading torque and HP, like Ford has in the F150 and Super Duty. And if that means offering the 3.0 in regular models, do it. In 2019 Ford came to market with class leading torque and allowed GM to continue with class leading HP. I don't believe people buying midsize are looking for max payload/towing. Tacoma has the lowest tow rating and sells the most. Give the Ranger coil spring rear for a great ride, as it appears the 2024 Tacoma will have it as well. My guess is all the other global improvements will follow across, 4A transfer case, heated steering wheel, ventilated seats. Offer 2-tone interior options as GM is doing on the 2023 midsize.

[@kenwelsh4189]

Ford has made the ranger a decent truck. They could use a longer at least 5.5 or 6 ft bed. At least internally the seating is more comfortable than Toyotas Tacoma. Between power and fuel mileage this has been a winner in fords camp.

[@TNitroH]

Way to much money for a small truck. Nobody buys this truck here in the US Midwest. People like the maverick but dealerships are screwing the pooch on price add ON's which keeps production numbers low. Ford needs to eliminate dealers now

[@Mayaisslaying1221]

So far so good

[@wildbill23c]

Regular Cab, 6-1/2 foot to 7 foot bed, and no bells and whistles....just a plain ole "work" truck with 4WD is what Ford should come out with...enough of the 4 door suitcase sized bed crap.

[@pabo8080]

$52 000 is just crazy

[@tophat2002]

Raise a family on a farm with a 50,000$ ranger. Goofy

[@donaldpiper9763]

@@tophat2002 Have you priced a Toyota Tacomas’s , Nissan Frontier’s , Chevrolet Colorado’s , GMC Canyon’s . They’re all priced the same,from there base models to the top of the line . So pick your poison !

[@tophat2002]

@@donaldpiper9763 exactly.. pick your poison is right in ! 🤭

[@jackdangers3292]

@@tophat2002 i dont quite understand what you mean by these words.

[@tophat2002]

@@jackdangers3292 a modern Ford ranger isn't the ideal farm truck.. and to start a family farm from poverty, $50,000 is too expensive for something that isn't capable. Trucks are tractors...

[@CarnutMM]

I love the chrome appearance package. And yes, Current Ranger looks great.

[@CraigSmith568]

I want a standard cab long bed with analog gauges and actual knobs for the radio and heater. You can also leave off all that electronic bullshit that is just there for show. Lastly I want a switch to lock in the front and rear lockers. Of course none of this will happen so if I want a new Ranger I will be stuck buying one designed to please all the women in the world.

[@47mossie]

2.7 liter option please!

[@WayneBeverly-gk8cx]

Pro Power Onboard!

[@RidersInBlack]

This might be the most Important and exciting launch of vehicles in the last few years. Mid size pickups are slowly gaining ground and are exactly what most people need. I'm excited to see a Ford Ranger hybrid plug in . GM and Chevrolet do not have that on the pipeline as of yet, but they do offer basic work trucks and different trims. That will differ with the ranger. Keep the same power train it's a good engine and transmission. The previous ranger was already dated when it arrived in North America. It just looks uninspiring and frumpy. Also I feel that the reach into the bed at the back is too high. The Rangers always had a jacked up appearance. If you're a contractor reaching in for stuff back there you won't appreciate that On a daily basis. I like the new interior design of the ranger though and exterior looks good. Let the competition begin! Great review guys thanks again!

[@JONMPG]

I like them I want to get one after my van dies. I like my dealer they still have them all marked at MSRP and they are way cheaper than a full size F150.

[@lucpedneault9724]

Guys, I hear you about 50k for a mid size truck, but the half ton are now 75k. I don't like it, but that's inflation realty, the 50 k is only meaningful if you compare a similarly package from its competitors.

[@vagabondwheels3002]

For the love of God - please - a manual!!!!

[@sandcrewus1362]

Imagine if they put the 3.5 in the ranger

[@joshuaallswang8016]

The Ranger is the Best looking mid size truck currently!

[@rickeycooley9139]

Yes it does, I think the Tacoma looks a great .

[@jax1079]

Never been a big fan of the current Ranger since it was a stop gap to compete in a vacated market segment, but I genuinely like the Bronco Sport and I love the Maverick. It’ll be interesting to see how the next one stacks up against the Colorado and upcoming Tacoma. Great video, guys! Love your content.

[@keithimmel4275]

When Ford brought the Ranger back to the U.S. they had quite a few decent colors. Now only the silver and black appeal to me, They had a decent red, blue and bright metallic orange. Now they are all gone. The current blue and red are sickly. No greens at all. This would be an easy fix for Ford.

[@ubangiestomp]

If the Ranger would come with the 3.3L naturally aspirated V6 as an option then I'd be getting one. Ecoboost isn't that great of an engine. Just a problem for you in the future if you keep a vehicle long term like I do.

[@morningdrums]

I want to see more off-road capability and better suspension for off roading. It needs to compete with the off road world.

[@SargeWadam]

I wish the NA Ranger comes with a diesel and a manual. I know it most likely won’t, but man just imagine Ford doing that.

[@liamrobinson2084]

This seems to be a short lifecycle, at least for a midsize truck, at least compared to the Japanese trucks. What are the trade-offs for refreshing more quickly? Have they had time to find and fix the mechanical weaknesses? Is there a gap in reliability? Is the price relatively higher? Great video gents!

[@rustlesee]

Well, five model years here in NA. That’s a lot for vehicles, don’t think the Toyota truck mindset (updating every 10+ years) is the normal.

[@ALMX5DP]

Yup what Russell said, on top of the other world market bones of the vehicle that have been around 4-5 years prior to that as well. Considering that aspect, and it's actually a pretty long production run for the vehicle.

[@liamrobinson2084]

Thanks for updating me on the lifecycle, gents. 5 years seems about right, industry-wide, with Tacoma going 10+ years, and the Frontier going 16 years before updating to the current truck. For not-so-few years in that time there was no N.A. Ranger, no GM offering, and still no Ram for N.A. How to see past the hype and excitement to see if the truck is actually a good buy (see return of the Bronco for a cautionary tale). Any ideas?

[@rowerwet]

The ranger is a 2012 design, just not introduced in NA until 2019. It's about the oldest current design in the US market, up there with the taco.

[@paulm6481]

Hopefully they fix it’s suspension. It can get you sick with its motions on highways currently. I agree definitely looks dated.

[@ericbalza2747]

i want a 6" box ,reg cab and 33' tires. i want a simple dashboard.

[@ALMX5DP]

6" is a bit small.. :P

[@02hreblue30]

won't happen

[@liamrobinson2084]

​@@02hreblue30 I am afraid you are right.

[@lonniebenedict4966]

I would like to see a heated steering wheel, a sun roof, a 6 foot bed with the crew cab and an electric rear sliding window.

[@richcreager7877]

6ft bed on the Super Crew cab

[@cardude1992]

Looks sharper and more handsome compared to the new gen model.

[@ryansheard8092]

Not sure why everyone gets so upset about a manual. It's literally not needed today with all the drive modes. I had a 5-speed Ranger back in the early 2000s and it was cool but it's just not all that today.

[@mason7188]

I’m a Ford guy but they definitely need to step up everything from interior, exterior ,power train and a off-road model if they want to compete with GM and the 1/4 ton market

[@Redneck_Wizard]

I agree especially when it comes to interiors except I think Ford makes way more quality off-road options than GM, for example the Ranger Raptor. Just compare the new Chevy Blazer to the new Bronco.

[@acevent5759]

In America for this kind of in hot water we’re not really into them anymore. with there crazy markups

[@HappyRockOffroad]

Got my ranger tremor for well under msrp in 2021 and it's a great beater truck (not daily driver) with great maneuverability on tight trails. 1480 lbs of payload, 7500 tow, ACC and advanced safety/terrain features. Its a great roadtrip vehicle, comfortable on road characteristics. I've had no issues with it's power train, never been stuck on the trails here in socal (yet) and ive recovered a few vehicles while ive had it. It's got outdated interior but I've hosed it down a few times I don't need all the flashy gadgets in a beater truck. I do wish they'd have power rear sliding window and 60/40 back seat. I plan on getting the next gen Raptor I'd wait for at least the 2nd year to let them work out the kinks but it looks great can't wait to see what this segment has to offer with yota and RAM

[@izzywashington5461]

Shoulda got an older gen

[@daved6464]

I like the look of the Ranger. Cant decide between a Rnager and a Jeep Gladiator. Jeeps are so expensive and the Ranger seems to be a better value.

[@MeliorIlle]

Buy a freaking Ranger, the fact you're even considering a 60K midsize truck is silly.

[@daved6464]

@@MeliorIlle Ya ive had 2 Wranglers and 2 Cherokees so Im a jeep guy but it may be time for a change. Just cant justify the Gladiator price

[@Redneck_Wizard]

Ranger Raptor if you're interested in off-roading.

[@daved6464]

@@Redneck_Wizard Raptor would be great but not in the budget I only do mild off roading so an FX4 or Tremor would be fine.

[@MeliorIlle]

@@Redneck_Wizard You don't need a raptor to off road, this video shows you a FX4 can get through 90% of trails.

[@ryanchlebak5646]

Needs a sunroof, at this price point it's unreal that it doesnt have the option.

[@michaeldemarco9950]

Still a great looking truck. I like it more than the new one.

[@adrianguzman5501]

Notification gang 🙌

[@davidbarnett5777]

I’d like to se the 2.7 twin turbo V-6 in the new Ranger…w/dual port injection…..but I’m dreaming.

[@bradbaraniuk4085]

i hope they dont do what chevy did with the new colorado change the switch for turning on headlights were you have to use the screen,why fix whats not broken.

[@atg1338]

If you have auto headlights why do you need a knob🤔

[@ALMX5DP]

@@atg1338 agreed, though i'd personally say a physical switch is sometimes nice to have. The way the Colorado implements it though is pretty nice and seems easy to use in the rarer occasions it has to be manually turned off or permanently set to on.

[@OrcaBoat3]

Why do so many people want a bigger and slicker touch-screen display? Should't we be focused on the ROAD instead of the computer screen on the dashboard?

[@JefferysawyDigitalcreator]

I got a 2022 is still the best-looking truck

[@jn9604]

Personally adding a huge tough screen that integrates many functionas and fully digital gauge panel is not an upgrade in my mind. They look cheap and videogamish, they are not always intuative to use and hwne they break and they do, they are really expensive to fix. All these are negatives. I would rather have that money spent on other basic features like material quality, ride and suspension. A huge touch screen is one reason I likely wouldn't buy one.

[@thisdayage7997]

i could see Ford mirroring all engines options with the Bronco ….2.3 base-2.7v6 & 3.0v6 in the raptor …..imagine the new ranger with a 2.7 tuned 🤯

[@kevingroulx9205]

I think the grill on the current ranger makes the truck look old

[@the_jarmel]

Have a beautiful SATURDAY EVERYONE ✌️ LOVE THE SHOW GUYS 👏👏👏

[@hairychesticles1]

Only things that kept me from buying a ranger was the 10 speed and the interior. I think a 10 speed can be good but ive been in a co workers f150 a number of times and it can be fairly clunky

[@damiangutierrez9103]

We should have seen a new Ranger in North America in the last couple of years.

[@morningdrums]

Here it is 2023 and the ranger feels like it has been left behind as ford has built this beautiful off road bronco. The ranger is supposed to be tough and rugged, but it doesn't look that way. It really screams for a lift, more off road options from the factory and bigger more aggressive tires. The front end and the hood of the ranger is just plain and blah.

[@seanh2390]

Hope the new Ranger Lariat comes with 4 auto, in addition to 4H and 4L. In other words, just like the current F150 Lariat and higher trims. Also, a push button start on all trims would be nice.

[@RichWithWisdom]

I was into the new ranger until they said only one motor option. I have bought a new toyota & a new nissan over the years, both with 4 cyl. Both dissappointing dogs & when people say they get better mileage they were wrong about that too because you have to shove your foot in it all the time, SO, I will never buy another 4 banger for a TRUCK......

[@spyder000069]

I would buy one if the 3.3L non-turbo v6 engine from the f150 was an option in the ranger. I don't need a fast truck and I don't mind losing a few mpg for a less complicated engine that is going be reliable for a long time. It won't happen because of ford trying to please EPA and be competive with others spec sheets.

[@chada.800]

They need to make it not look like the fusion

[@keving4304]

Still overpriced

[@Wmgoji]

I hope they just import the Australian ranger for the NA market too. My job got me a new Ranger work truck a few months ago. Plenty of power and easy to maneuver through crowded shop yards. Huge upgrade from the old, gross 2005 Dakota I inherited before.

[@glennalexander2071]

Real work trucks, for people that actually work, don't need touch screens.

[@joshuasmith8040]

Never liked the front end look of this era, too late 90s early 00s f150 look.. only thing keeping me from buying is rear seat space. My f150 has a huge back seat but a ranger is too small. Ford needs to find a couple inches for us family people who need a smaller truck but still haul people.

[@guantai69]

Electric vehicles only make sense for the small trip commute. Plug-in hybrids are king because they actually provide you better mileage AND range. Also as the consumer you can get away with a 120V outlet already installed in your garage.

[@edwardzdankiewicz9068]

first, reliability. Then availability. Now do affordability. Then go back and add the reliability missed in step 1.

[@Cloud30000]

‘Ford never shocks you with model changes’ Mustang Mach-E disagrees

[@chrisl3062]

Didn't this generation just come out in 2019 and you think it looks dated? lol you're crazy. Sincerely, a Frontier owner.

[@tholbrook422]

I hope it has dual injection instead of direct injection. Ecoboost Mustang will.

[@chuckles2040]

on that note, i will keep my paid off 2019 ranger.

[@haroldbanks5388]

A 2.7 turbo six-cylinder engine

[@Eightball2516]

Why are the European trucks better then the ones here in America they seem to have more options and last longer. No plug in rather just have a hybrid I don’t have to plug in to much of a hassle.

[@rickeycooley9139]

I agree with the plug-in. I have a 2018 Tacoma TRDOFF, and I bought my wife a 2018 4Runner. There both great running, and very reliable trucks. In 2019 we took a trip to Nashville. Didn’t see the first plug in, not one. They probably do now. We went to Bridestone arena to see Iron Maiden. So I wasn’t looking for plug ins