Trump's Beatdown in the 11th Circuit (Cannon Rebuked)

⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
Judge Cannon and Trump rebuked. 💡Go to legaleagle.link/brilliant and be one of the first 200 people to sign up and get 20% off your subscription with Brilliant.org!
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: [e-mail]
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at [e-mail]
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

[@LegalEagle]

⚖ Late breaking: Seems like Dearie is taking his job seriously and putting the screws to Trump's team. 💡Learn interactively with Brilliant! legaleagle.link/brilliant

[@ignitionfrn2223]

I don't know if that might be interesting but why not doing an episode on self defense with martial arts and how much you can use it without severe repercussions ? Also, can we fire the cannon ?

[@golach420]

@@ignitionfrn2223 You do realise planning a crime can lead to a more severe sentence... LOL

[@ignitionfrn2223]

@@golach420 Well i have noticed people were pretty triggered by Kyle Rittenhouse being declared "Not Guilty" on ground of self-defence: but that was for gun usage. I'm curious when it comes about Hand to hand combat...

[@Witchlord]

Ive read a lot from non-lawyers that he never expected to win this case and that this is just a delay tactic to stall until midterms where he hopes the GOP will retake the house and senate. Is this a sound theory or has trump hurt himself more than helped with the special master?

[@nemesislygr8960]

@@ignitionfrn2223 same here cause before that case I was under the impression self defense meant that- defense, so when you're no longer defending but are actively offending you've crossed the line. Now you can call me a bitch, but I'm not willing to put that to the test, so I'll keep running from fights until I get a clear answer cause I like my freedom and not being bent over against my will.

[@CityPlannerPlaysChair]

Dearie has done a phenomenal job showing how a Judge should actually rule on this case. Cannon should be removed from the bench for her nonsense.

[@notme2day]

Yup ... she just tried to tie judge Dearie's hand again in a new ruling. Wish that was included on this video.

[@defective6811]

There will almost certainly be behind the scenes actions that will all but end her career progression after this. This was her application for a political position from Trump in the future. Now, unless he wins again, she will never move forward professionally. I sure as sh*t hope, at least.

[@wynonasbigbrowndragon6121]

While I agree, what a sad bar. A judge asking for evidence is a brave move 🤦‍♂️

[@Woozlewuzzleable]

Common sense and facts win.

[@garymay9134]

Judge Cannon needs to be charged with obstructing justice and she needs to be impeached and removed as a judge

[@DarthShande]

I think it’s clear that Cannon was letting her personal opinion of Trump override what should have been common sense. Ruling in favor of Trump and aiding him should be enough to remove her from the bench.

[@richardscottmills]

You wonder how many appointees he selected specifically because he has some sort of dirt or leverage on them.

[@ronrendon]

Bingo.

[@johndoe6032]

@@richardscottmills She probably has a letter form trump in her back pocket that says do what you can for me and I'll put you on the supreme court when reelected. Her big mistakes were 1. helping trump, and 2. thinking he'll keep his word.

[@johndoe6032]

I think that would require an impeachment, which in our political climate is almost impossible. The only way an impeachment can happen any more is if the judge does something really bad and one party holds the majority of the house and senate as well as the WH to impeach and appoint whoever they want to replace.

[@erikdayne5429]

I don’t see how anyone can come to any other conclusion. She made an unprecedented ruling to defend the person who appointed her. The corruption and conflict of interest is glaring and obvious.

[@DunantheDefender]

Her reasoning for the documents being possibly damaging reminds me of that bit in Liar Liar when Fletcher objects and the judge asks him under what grounds and he says "because it's damning to my case!"

[@WackoMcGoose]

I hope the Law & Order writers are taking notes, because they're gonna need to update their definition of "reality being stranger than fiction" on a weekly basis at this point.

[@gregwillett8051]

Hopefully, this is ends up as step in the right direction to holding United States' politicians accountable for their crimes. Too many politicians get so prolific and powerful that they are above the enforcement of the laws that would have every other normal citizen put away for years.

[@carissashley]

All politicians! I’ve been doing history digging and and holy schmolly, I do not like what I find. 🥴😳😤

[@Briaaanz]

Like the alcohol salesman that sold alcohol to members of Congress throughout Prohibition.

[@allasar]

Trump did a lot of crimes before he became president, so it is rich people as a whole who are not held accountable. If Trump was treated like everyone else, he would be in jail and never could have run for president.

[@Fausto_4841]

They had prescriptions for that alcohol.

[@decrulez]

@@Fausto_4841 Churchill sure did when visiting

[@JLF201]

I read the document. It was great, a real blow by blow of how laws and logic are supposed to work and all the ways Cannon and Trump failed to understand both.

[@whocares9033]

"Failed to understand" is a strange way to say "willfully perverted"

[@marmac83]

@@whocares9033 failing to understand is to willfully pervert

[@liontron8317]

Throwing shit at walls to see what sticks is still throwing shit

[@icin4d]

@@marmac83 No, not really. Failing to understand sounds like ignorance - your average village idiot. Willfully pervert sounds like corruption and intent.

[@buddha7489]

@@marmac83 I disagree

[@FearHimself666]

I love that he thinks declassifying works the same way as when Michael Scott declared bankruptcy

[@JoshSweetvale]

Even Michael Scott made sure he had a room full of witnesses.

[@_Aemse]

trumps gonna have to hire creed to be his lawyer pretty soon lol

[@ajtronic]

The Creed defense council 😂

[@-Bill.]

Cannon just overruled Dearie and moved the deadlines back to December. Is there no remedy for such a blatantly corrupt judge? She is practically acting as Trump's defense counsel.

[@undine120]

Pingpong appealing to the 11th circuit seems to be how this will go: Cannon: Approves nonsense 11th: No, that's dumb Cannon: Approves new nonsense 11th: No, that's dumb ...repeat ad naseum.

[@henrylake9294]

This is her audition for Supreme Court justice

[@Metrion77]

@@henrylake9294 And if trump wins in 2024, she'll be at the top of the list, even if that means trump expands the supreme court.

[@coopidge3372]

Congress can impeach her

[@RandomFandomDragon]

@@coopidge3372 that assumes there are enough members of congress who are not corrupt.

[@tsnap4]

Was one of the arguments literally "The govt. can't have the documents b/c Trump will come to harm if/when the documents are used to prosecute him for breaking the law"? Like, wouldn't that invalidate literally any search and seizure of any person ever?

[@gelinrefira]

Which is exactly why Legal Eagle mentioned there is a supreme court ruling that sometimes it is painful to be a citizen because you have to be subjected to searches in the process of your own prosecution, even if you are later found not guilty.

[@0Rookie0]

"Sir, if you arrest me, the coffee I bought for $0.98 will go cold, stale and eventually expire. That coffee was 10% of my holdings and is required for my borderline good mental state. I will be see you in court about causing me irreparable harm and causing me devastating financial harm. Oh and by the way, I'm claustrophobic and merinthophobic. I cannot be detained, my aunt said so." Trump and Co's roundabout on the fly "this is how it works" attitude reminds me of those skits of a young guy in a show or whatever making shit up as he is being confronted. "Oh, I'm not the thief, this is for my dying sister, she always wanted a VCR, but good luck finding that guy!" But it's not funny because it's true now and a matter of NATIONAL SECURITY. Like how is this even possible again and again.

[@annalieff-saxby568]

@@0Rookie0 Thanks for the new word!

[@Beegrene]

Your honor, I object! On what grounds? It's devastating to my case! Overruled. Good call.

[@nasis18]

@@Beegrene lol. I can't remember where that is from, but it's hilarious.

[@Roguefem76]

10:30 The last paragraph is _gold._ "Second, we find unpersuasive the Plaintiff's insistence that he would be harmed by a criminal investigation." That's legalese for "Tough s--t, suck it up."

[@demoncorejunior]

would love to see the opinion read “why would this one be bad when the other 30 didn’t bother you”

[@cronobactersakazakii5133]

Yup, criminals are always harmed by criminal investigation

[@nvelsen1975]

I'd hold a more accurate translation would be "That's the point of criminal investigations, you dumb twat". 😉

[@johndododoe1411]

They even quoted a 1940 ruling that directly said that.

[@erikdayne5429]

That’s a neat argument. “Yeah judge this investigation could harm me because I’m totally guilty”. Uh, thanks, good to know.

[@NinjaGidget]

"Classified documents are classified." What a groundbreaking legal ruling.

[@bryanbenaway5411]

Documents with classified markings are not necessarily classified. They are only classified until they are unclassified. And all classifications flow out of the power of one single elected office/official. That officer’s decisions are not reviewable.

[@bryanbenaway5411]

Documents with classified markings are not necessarily classified. They are only classified until they are unclassified. And all classifications flow out of the power of one single elected office/official. That officer’s decisions are not reviewable.

[@Ericwvb2]

@@bryanbenaway5411 "all classifications flow out of the power of one single elected office/official" - Is that single elected official the CURRENT or FORMER President? Because I am willing to bet that according to the CURRENT President those documents marked classified are in fact classified. Do you have some evidence that the CURRENT administration considers these documents declassified? Because the DOJ, FBI, etc., are not acting like they are.

[@geoffreysorkin5774]

@@bryanbenaway5411 Classified documents are only declassified when they have been marked as such. You can't "declassify" with telepathy or mere words, no matter who you are. Those procedures were from an Obama EO that Trump never rescinded (you also can't rescind EO's from prior Presidents with telepathy).

[@lottasunshine1325]

@@bryanbenaway5411 That's not the way it's done. However, aren't we are discussing documents still marked "classified?" So why were they still marked classified if they weren't? Trump hasn't been in office since Jan 2021, so he has no right to them anyway. In addition, some of the documents found in Mar-a-:Lago are highly sensitive documents that only belong in a SCIF which stands for Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. They should never have been kept at Mar-a-Lago. In any case, all of the thousands of documents, classified or not (except for the former president's personal property) belong to the government. Period, end of story.

[@dorpth]

It really is insane how our country is the only developed democracy that has election officials and judges picked by politicians. In most other countries, elections are run by independent commissions and judges picked by independent legal experts. Of course, ANY system can be corrupted, but I guarantee you that no Judge Cannon's ever would have made it to a federal bench if the American Bar association was in charge of approving judges (or at least had a veto).

[@Kathy-kr1sv]

Exactly. And sanely.... The USA way... Is nuts Seems set up to fail. Or be corrupted or manipulated Stupid I add my now country Australia and birth country New Zealand have COMPULSORY VOTING SO non of this stupid time wasting and corruptible B. S.

[@bobbun9630]

I think it's rather odd that Cannon is sticking to Trump at this point. She has a lifetime appointment. That means that sticking to Trump is optional. Moreover, she's not incredibly old, so she has a long career ahead. Trumpism is unlikely to be how things work out in the long run. She's destroying her credibility now, potentially opening herself up to impeachment, and for what? Surely she isn't dreaming, like some congresscritter, of a dream lobbying job after retirement.

[@likealightning4139]

@@bobbun9630 like others said I think she is hoping Don the Con makes it back into Office in 2024 and basically auditioning for a Supreme Court seat

[@danagrey3534]

@@likealightning4139 Don the Con? 🤣😂🤪😜 He will or someone like DeSantis will thanks to people like you, the hundreds if not thousands of your fellow brainwashed, liberals, Demon Rats. Hell Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Hillary, Schiif, Schumer, and countless Demon Rat governorrs are so bad that you all refuse to even mention mention what a con job they are... 40 yrs high inflation, wild spending sprees that only pad their pockets, open borders in hopes of the minority vote, out of control crime, brainwashing education systems in out schools, abortion and stripping women of their rigged to their own bodies... now you have Devin Stone promoting that we need two legal systems... one for liberals and one for conservatives as Lady Justice is no longer blind and one cannot get fair representation by a liberal attorney or judge. Most are tired to the liberal corruption and I do feel there is going to be a major shift in power thanks to people like you who make comments like yours! Keep it up as you and your fellow Demon Rat supporters are doing an great job!

[@JoshSweetvale]

@@likealightning4139 Well, she expects Republicans to regain power at _some_ point, and for them there's no going back to pretending civility, a 100% partisan judge will always be useful to the Republicans.

[@apokalypsecow9756]

So with Mike Lindell probably going to trial soon, does this mean we'll soon be discussing... ...the Pillow Case?

[@warlordofbritannia]

I guess you could say Lindell is going to be…pillowried!

[@drunkenfarmerjohn42]

Get. Out.

[@AskMia411]

YES thank you for this pun!!!! Legal Eagle needs to have that in the title if he covers that case!!!!

[@zappababe8577]

Oh, you!

[@qwkimball]

It's more of a Sham.

[@MostlyElectrolytes]

If you listen to Roger Stone talking about the election months prior where he talks about "our judges" you start to understand why Trump appointed more judges than anyone even after he was fired and why it's problematic.

[@ChobinoftheFunk]

@Lexington73300 Only if followed and/or enforced.

[@donkrapf]

Trump appointed so many judges because McConnell held up judge appointments for the last two years of Obama's term, not just the POTUS appointment.

[@gryjffrs]

What you say is completely true but doesn't get to the root of the issue. The whole confirming of judges at breakneck speed wasn't DT's idea, he as ignorant of that process as I am of performing brain surgery. The plan was/is McConnell's and it's about being able to control the country even when Republicans are out of power inside the beltway like they presently are. Looks to be working to me!

[@TheOfficialTarynTots]

Actually, Biden has appointed more judges than Trump at the same point in his term. I think it was as much as Trump, Obama, and George W. Bush together. If Biden keeps the pace up as he has been he will definitely appoint more Judges in his 4 year term than Trump did his.

[@aprisia]

@@donkrapf McConnell most certainly stole hundreds of judgeships, including 3 Supreme Court seats. But, at the same time, Obama screwed up by not making appointing judges a major priority for the other 6 years of his presidency.

[@huntercoleherr]

It is incredible how there are essentially no requirements to become a judge, and it is nearly impossible to be fired as one.

[@carlrosa1130]

This actually happened: Trump: I want a hearing! Judge Cannon: You got it. Trump: Now, I want a special master! Judge Cannon: You got it. Trump: And the FBI planted documents! Special Master: Okay, provide evidence for it. Trump: Um......The entire system is corrupt!!!!

[@MMuraseofSandvich]

Cannon: He's right! Stop it, Dearie!

[@Electrodexify]

The system is corrupt NPCs like you are unable to see and trust the institutions blindly and unable to follow the money as well as connect the dots.

[@carlrosa1130]

@Salty Shaco Yeah, no offense, Salty. I can't take you seriously. I don't think you even understand what you just typed.

[@carlrosa1130]

@Off Road Guy Riiiiiiiiiiiight. All of this with Trump is about LIBERALS. LMAO. What a dullard.

[@larrylindgren9484]

@Off Road GuyIt's only bad when you don't like it. Funny how that works.

[@ronumpleby3517]

"You have the unenviable task of proving to me that the rules do not apply to you" -Judge Marylin Milian

[@Melesniannon]

"Trump keeps inserting himself into the most interesting legal cases in the country". That's a really charitable way of saying, "Former president rich man gets away with nonsense lawsuits that regular people would not even consider seriously or have the resources to attempt." Something about about poo and walls comes to mind. People seriously ought to be legally censured for trivial BS lawsuits.

[@onedayatatime007]

It's really just a nice way of saying everyone is still obsessed with Trump and can't focus on real world issues still.

[@logansmall5148]

@@onedayatatime007 Real world issues like trying to overthrow the government?

[@worthythaneofross3925]

@@onedayatatime007 real world issues like setting a precedent for what happens to treasonous US presidents? Or “real world issues” like a black mermaid?

[@peggedyourdad9560]

The only issue I can see for punishing people for nonsense lawsuits is the question of who's gonna be deciding what counts as a nonsense lawsuit.

[@threenumbnuts]

​@@peggedyourdad9560 Don't judges already decide what counts as a nonsense lawsuit? They can call it frivolous, dismiss it, and even ask the plaintiff to pay for the defendant's attorney fees.

[@ghandimauler]

The fact you can talk about all this surreal insanity without laughing, crying or pulling out your magnificent coiffure shows how effective you are in keeping a straight face... Thanks for your channel. I wish there was a Canadian equivalent as our legal system could really use someone to explain the complexities.

[@johnchedsey1306]

It seems like the 11th Circuit dealt with Cannon the same way a law professor would deal with a first year student who just turned in a poorly written exam. She should resign from her post in disgrace. Everyone who appears before her in the future will point out how bad she is at her job and that any decision she makes is suspect.

[@williamtell5365]

I'm an attorney too. Although it was appropriate, I was surprised a bit by the severity of the language in this opinion. It was scolding, even mocking, Trump and the district court judge. It's about time that Trump gets that. It's frustrating seeing him using utterly spurious arguments in court.

[@peggyking9543]

I think the Courts can still actually be shocked that a former President can go so off the rails. The smackdown is a proportional response to the current, and potential future threat level of assertions by Former gov't officials. And thankfully, is already setting precedent with the ruling. (See Mike "Pillow".)

[@coryzilligen790]

"It's frustrating seeing him using utterly spurious arguments in court." Even more than that, it's infuriating seeing how rarely anything happens as a result of it. And even more so the trend of them making misleading to outright slanderous public claims relating to the cases which they are unwilling to make inside the courthouse, and again having nothing happen as a result.

[@JLF201]

If those people (Trump team and Cannon) had any self respect, they would be mortified by that opinion. It's like saying "not only do you not understand how this works in general, you don't have a f'ing clue how to apply the meaning of the most basic parts." BURN!

[@neolexiousneolexian6079]

It's not scolding or mocking. It's simply stating the facts. But when you state the facts about a narcissist that's used to getting away with everything, it inevitably sounds quite harsh.

[@Justanotherconsumer]

That’s because even the legal profession has standards. Playing stupid games that support the argument that the system is corrupt and biased needs to be smacked down, hard. If they can’t maintain the veneer of justice and honor and other glittering generalities, who would follow their rulings? Things like Cannon getting smacked should happen much, much more often. Corruption and favoritism are lethal to the credibility of the system, and credibility is the only reason it means anything at all. That lawyers like Powell haven’t been disbarred for their obvious fitness and character issues also raises serious questions. Not that the cynics will ever be convinced that the system is anything more than just “pay enough money and you get the ruling you want.”

[@jloiben12]

I do enjoy watching stupid legal professionals get absolutely slapped down. However, it is concerning when the stupid legal professional is a judge

[@markgoodwin6266]

Was a tRump appointed Bimbo, sucking up to Donnie dearest in thanks for the job.

[@erikdayne5429]

She might not be stupid, she might just be corrupt.

[@Billsbob]

What about conflicted magistrates who authorized the warrant?

[@markgoodwin6266]

@@Billsbob how was the judge conflicted, the EVIDENCE was there. How's that a conflict?

[@erikdayne5429]

@@markgoodwin6266 lol I think this guy is making the argument that the judge that issued the warrant has a conflict of interest because they want people to follow the law and that conflicts with Trump’s interest to break the law and get away with it.

[@genexplore]

Okay, that stock footage of a judge beating someone with a gavel was fantastic.

[@CyrusTheFrog]

I instantly paused and went to comments to give that clip love if it hadn't been done already, glad I'm not alone.

[@GamingWithNikolas]

If anyone deserves that treatment it's honestly Alex Jones. I'd say he is even worse than Trump at handling the legal system.

[@jflanglois168]

As a trial lawyer myself, I truly enjoy your videos and subscribed to your channel for a while now... along with other informational content providers. Your videos and others have convinced me to purchase three Nebula and CuriosityStream bundles for myself, my sister and my parents. Albeit everyone should, in my opinion, stay curious and learn new things all their lives... this is particularly a good skill set (general culture and knowledge) to develop for a trial lawyer. Thank you for your work, it is appreciated.

[@PieManZXY]

Been waiting for this! Judge Cannon's decision goes against decades of precedent and her ruling completely tramples on the known scope of the Executive Branch. Great work on the video.

[@haveaday1812]

Good. Everyone in the executive branch needs to be a the end of a rope anyway, so anything that goes against them is fine by me.

[@Justanotherconsumer]

SCOTUS has declared that precedent is unimportant if it serves GOP political goals. That’s par for the course.

[@7DK7DK]

@@Justanotherconsumer dawg you know legal segregation was 60 years of established precedent

[@RandyFortier]

We're finding lots of general practices and honor codes that clearly need to become law, after a Donald Trump presidency.

[@lonnyhandwork422]

Cannon’s initial ruling could conceivably have been bad “judgement”. That said, from an outward perspective, it certainly appears to have been less than impartial. Could she face any of her own legal fallout?

[@entropy8634]

She straight up said she's not impartial before she hear any argument from both sides. As if being failed president is suppose to be granted immunity from rule of law

[@caboodles2627]

I like what happened to the corrupt Persian judge Sisamnes. That really set an example for judges back then 😆

[@planswalker]

Unfortunately, she'll likely have to put out years of unethical judging before she is kicked out

[@erikdayne5429]

It was worse than bad judgement it was blatant corruption

[@sirmoonslosthismind]

@@caboodles2627 note however that sisamnes's newly-vacated position was then inherited by his son. we may not want to copy that part.

[@perciusmandate]

As great as it is that Dearie is finally putting Trump's legal team to task for their BS, it should have never gotten to this state to begin with. Cannon should have denied even having the motions brought before her. The only positive thing is that the Trump team is finally learning that delays and misdirection can only go so far in the US legal system.

[@jedgrahek1426]

I am so relieved by what this Appeals Court did. I feel exactly like the opening line, like I'm not taking crazy pills anymore. Thank you for the great video.

[@Lanier2369]

And Trump bringing up Hillary's emails...I know he was trying to deflect but holy crap that was the most insane and most awkward way I've EVER seen someone do the deflection thing I have EVER seen. Very clunky, very awkward... That's the level of something who just heard about the deflection tactic the day before and decided to try it out, not knowing how to slide it in in a natural way.

[@Gumduckylee]

That was Windows when you try to open a program, the computer freezes then opens 8.

[@peggyking9543]

Pure comedy gold. Seth or Stephen may have written that as a pretty funny joke, but TFG ACTUALLY said it...🤣🤪😜😂

[@johndoe6032]

It almost makes me wonder if he actually does have them ,and it holding them to keep some kind of leverage over the Clintons or others who he thinks could be implicated. But ironically it would also be illegal for him to knowingly have possession of her emails with classified materials and not tell anyone. How sweet would it be if Trump went to jail for Hillary's emails! I mean, it's a dream with odds right up there with winning the lottery, but just as sweet of a dream.

[@akaimizu1]

Or more so, his Parrot mind. He's entrapped the statement "But Hillary's Emails" so deeply, he often goes on parrot mode just to grab that one. He thinks that is one of those themes, he can bring back, and never gets old. It's basically his "I am rubber you are glue" line. When he has nothing, and can't answer something, but wishes to speak. That is one of those (Pull the string on the talking doll) phrases, he will invariably come up with. Even if it is completely out of context for the question or topic at hand. Person: You know, that is a beautiful sunset today. 45: Yes. And by the time it sets, I hope they find those 3000 Hillary Emails. Person: Awesome, I just got into law school. UCLA. 45: Nice. You see LA, while I'll see about those 3000 Hillary Emails. Parrot: Squawk! Polly wants a cracker! 45: Squawk! I want to see those 3000 Hillary Emails. His catchphrase on his tomb will probably have, "I'll be looking for those 3000 emails from beyond the grave." I've never seen someone so mentally entangled by an opponent they didn't even lose to. For which said opponent doesn't have political power nor relevance enough to even be worried about. If you want the biggest definition of a sore winner and a sore loser, at the same time, his picture needs to go there.

[@austenbin4068]

The sad thing is that there are a lot of REALLY dumb people out there who will buy it wholesale.

[@WillRennar]

"Judge Dearie is asking Trump's team to, in legal speak, _put up or shut up."_ I love this guy.

[@elevenm.a.1125]

Which one? Devin or Dearie?

[@oriolgonzalez9328]

@@elevenm.a.1125 Devin

[@daydreamerX200]

Unfortunately it seems like judge cannon said: not on my watch.

[@csnide6702]

@@daydreamerX200 because she is bought and paid for with Trump money

[@inventgineer]

The real question is: why is "Judge" Cannon still allowed to practise law under her current position? She not only knowingly and willingly involved herself in a case in which she has DIRECT conflict of interest (her job being granted to her by the defense), but then also openly sided with him (her employer) in a manner in which basically all other independent judges agree was not actually legal (and furthermore not even well-veiled in its corrupt purpose). If she continues to hold title in her current position, it will be a testament to law ruling over justice in this country, rather than justice ruling the law -a testament to a system that is fundamentally broken, where judges can be openly bought and never challenged in their corrupt actions. And if our courts of law cannot be trusted......well, then we are in total chaos and anarchy, then we are back in the dark again, uncivilized and without greater purpose, no higher ideals to be protected and lived by in pursuit of grand dreams.

[@syav4467]

Glad to see the special master and the 11th circuit actually doing their job.

[@Flexible_photon]

I'm just now realizing that they picked this specific special master not because he was a republican but because he was old and they thought that would allow them to drag out the legal proceedings and stall and delay.

[@johndoe6032]

I still think the special master could be totally in the bag for Trump. I don't believe they would appoint someone they already confirmed would be on their side. My guess is they know the problems with classified stuff is unavoidable at this point, but there is some much heavier incriminating stuff in the seized documents that they are really working to block the DOJ from seeing. The special master is making moves and comments now to create an appearance of objectivity now, but will bend over backwards to block the DOJ from seeing anything else.

[@abc123tiktok]

I read some where that they choose him because he was part of the investigation of Trump on whether Russia interfere with 2016. This could play of role of prejudice maybe Trump team could bring up though wouldn't make sense since they picked him. But more importantly the investigation did not really end well for Dearie mostly making mistakes in part of investigation. As we know eventually didn't lead anywhere. So they are probably hoping he makes mistakes and Trump gets away.

[@brightemerald3924]

I also felt this initially as well.🤔

[@Visplight]

Yup. He had a reputation for moving slowly - but he ain't dumb, and he ain't corrupt. What's more, he knew that was why he was requested, so it lit a fire under his ass, and he's all "appoint ME cause you think I'm a doddering old coot, will you? Well, kindy garden's over - it's now Surprise Exam day and I am your Professor from hell!" He's not favoring the DOJ, but he IS demanding parties perform at a very high level of speed and legal competence - and it's not a level Trump's Not-Really-A-Lawyer-Just-Play-One-On-TV clowns can hope to reach.

[@jamesleonard2754]

He was the judge that found problems with the Steele documents filed by the FBI during the Russia investigation.. that’s why they wanted him

[@raceytray3963]

The TLDR of the ruling was “Dude, seriously!? They’re classified documents. Of course he doesn’t own them!”

[@LegoAssassin098]

My thing is that even IF they were declassified, they are still property of the US Archives.

[@BradBrown95]

@@LegoAssassin098 Literally every president has done this but you know Orange man bad

[@Snugggg]

@@BradBrown95 you've earned your rubles

[@Ericwvb2]

Cannon keeps going back to this loopy notion that he has some sort of rights over ANY of these government documents. He's no longer President. Biden wisely cut off his security clearance right away. Any access he has to ANY of these government documents are on a case by case voluntary basis by agencies like NARA and the CURRENT executive branch can make those decisions.

[@tatersalad76]

@@BradBrown95 no they really haven't

[@karentiger8812]

Thank you for talking about these cases despite the brainwashed people who keep getting mad at you for stating facts.

[@coreysierchio4650]

"His three middle-aged children" made me chuckle out loud. *Thanks for the Content* !

[@MLennholm]

12:12 That removal of language didn't just mean that Judge Dearie wasn't required to submit reports and recommendations, it meant he wouldn't be allowed to. It's entirely irrelevant to the 11th circuit ruling, its removal was another disgraceful attempt by Cannon to do Trump's bidding and sneak in a delaying strategy and Judge Dearie just called her out on it.

[@warlordofbritannia]

Trump pissing off his own special master is a bold move Let’s see how to plays out for him

[@LegoAssassin098]

Especially with today's order, where she is continuing to basically trying to circumvent her own special master.

[@danagrey3534]

Absolutely... we gotta take the focus off of our party's failures. I really thinks Biden, Harris, Pelosi, the Clinton's, Obama, Sanders and many other W.H. liberals and governors are doing a fantastic job! It is finally about time we have open borders and welcome whoever whenever to the U.S. We still pay far less for fuel than the rest of the world and we should raise gas to at least $15-$20 a gallon! We should do away with all immigration laws and while I live and works in a very upscale areas, as long as they don't come to my areas we need more immigrants! Republicans and Don the Con as you call him... we need more groups like BLM... like Latinos, Asian, Native American, German, Polish, Russian, Dutch, Ukrainian, Irish groups demand the stop of racism Crime is so much better under Biden! We need to do away with arrests and jailing people until they go to court! Despite Trump is a con, he did a ton of positive things for this country and we need to keep him or anyone like him from running in 2024@@@

[@SylviaRustyFae]

3:38 Note for those who arent privy to how the Circuit Courts work, a "unanimous" decision by those courts is not a decision made by all 11 judges. It is a decision made by 3 randomly selected judges out of those 11; in this case, two of them were Trump appointees even.

[@SylviaRustyFae]

@@thirdspacemaker9141 Fixed, i get so confused with the govt names for courts and shit cuz even every state has a different name for their things so i can nvr remember even the federal lvl things xD

[@GRJ-uz7kf]

Yes, an "En Banc" decision would be even more devastating.

[@SylviaRustyFae]

@@GRJ-uz7kf Thanks for the term :3

[@pierrecurie]

@ADVENT Insider Even in that case, there is an incentive to pack the court in your favor... it's just less reliable.

[@threenumbnuts]

@ADVENT Insider that or turn into a wildly swinging pendulum of judicial retaliation between the liberal and conservative justices. "Shit, we rolled Thomas and Alito, the national abortion ban stands. But we did get Kagan and Sotomayor for the other case, so we'll only allow civilians to own simple handguns, and require them to pass strict mental health and proficiency tests."

[@jamescomstock7299]

I've been eagerly awaiting your analysis of this! Thanks for putting it together and sharing it with us!

[@CarlosRodriguez-dd4sb]

Honestly, I feel like I should be having popcorn and a beer while watching these videos. So entertaining!!

[@garymay9134]

The more judge Cannon helps Trump the worse things are going to get for her

[@johndoe6032]

How? I think she would need to be impeached. And that's clearly never going to happen with trump in her corner. If anything she's secured a back door deal with trump to be his next SCOTUS appointment if he's re-elected.

[@dr.floridamanphd]

I think after this most recent mushroom stamping from the 11th Circuit she’s going to start hedging her bets.

[@markg.7865]

Let's hope so, she is a disgrace.

[@snupjeve]

@Jeffrey Hupf - it will take forever. This is even worse than Roy Pearson, and that took over a decade.

[@tonyvelasquez6776]

@Jeffrey Hupf yo brrodie I'm dropping a massive steamer right now i just wish it was stinking more so I can inhale the scent

[@DiarrheaBubbles]

It feels like the people in the upper ranks of our government are immune to the law. It would make me so happy to see these people held accountable for their crimes.

[@KaitouKaiju]

They are the law

[@khanhnguyen-tt3ff]

It seem like it cause they know the limit and loophole and smart enought to used them unlike trump who think we are in an absolute monarchy

[@johndoe6032]

They would have to make laws to hold themselves accountable. And as long as it's big money donors and not the people that decide elections, that will never happen. Trump has really shined a light on how little accountability there is in the law for a president, and it's really sad. We are now paying for the hubris of the founding fathers who assumed that having only wealthy land-owning white men allowed to elect leaders would always lead to the election of fair and just leaders. And ironically, it's the fact that elections are still basically being decided by wealthy white men is exactly why we end of with puppet clowns in office instead of good smart and fair people.

[@boslyporshy6553]

Has a crime been committed?

[@SonsOfLorgar]

​@@boslyporshy6553 does bears shit in the woods?

[@southwerk]

Very well done, always a pleasure listening to these. (from an old, old lawyer)

[@queens.dee.223]

I love catching up on the news around this stuff through your channel. Also, is that an actual rotary phone?!?!

[@demeter-the-great]

I was so concerned that the justice system would let me down given the judge’s initial bombshell ruling in Trump’s favor. So happy I was wrong. Although, there is still time for Teflon Don to escape justice … again.

[@lukesutton4135]

Imagine being concerned about nothing while your entire country is being robbed of everything. Communists never cease to amaze me of course, until they are the ones getting robbed.

[@caboodles2627]

He isn’t president anymore. There’s a reason he desperately tried holding onto power for so long. He had protections then.

[@troubadour723]

@UC-ntgBsCxU0xw8TReEO23vg Die? He'll outlive us all. (well, him and Dick Cheney.)

[@vanivari359]

It kinda bothers me how often nowadays people mention, who appointed a judge. Everybody seems to assume that this is important which does not shine a very good light at the justice system. It would be naive to assume that judges are completely objective, but one would hope that laws are clear enough and there are enough checks and balances to prevent a heavy impact.

[@radishhat5736]

@@vanivari359 I mean. the supreme court happened. Fillibusters and etc up he ass. its already super politicized, everything else is just trickle down corruption.

[@merphul]

the 11th circuits response was brutal. smart move of the DOJ to focus only on the classified docs, made it easier to rule on quickly and if there is going to be an indictment, those docs will bear more with with the grand jury than the 11k public available docs.

[@RedRocket4000]

The laws being used considering defense secret don't require documents to be classified thus Trump declassification changes nothing even if he actually did it which he did not. But the actual charges do depend on documents that would be classified and all the Government needs to convict are them. The other stuff only extra crimes not yet charged or in rare cases something that never was classified but should have been.

[@c3mac55]

It also established the grounds and precedent for all the other docs in the case.

[@fredsmith4134]

i am so glad i found this channel, it gives straight forward clear and concise break downs of case i am interested in , well done !!!

[@toddrowe9670]

Your videos and explanations are brilliant too. Thanks!

[@mechmat12345]

Lots of goofballs on the Special Master video were claiming you were biased against Trump in your analysis, when in fact you gave his case more deference than it deserved. Cannon was completely off her rocker, as has been proven out by both the 11th Circuit and Judge Dearie.

[@wareforcoin5780]

He's very clearly biased against Trump. I say this as another person who's very clearly biased against Trump.

[@Jehty_]

@@wareforcoin5780 but he wasn't biased against Trump *in his analysis* Two completely different things.

[@Leith_Crowther]

I’m biased toward reality. Not my fault reality is biased against trump.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

​@@Leith_Crowther that's the unfortunate consequence for any narcissistic pathological liar like DT🤣

[@Ryuujinv01]

@@wareforcoin5780 He's biased in favor of law, which Trump is brazenly against. Coming to a factual reason to be against a specific person doesn't exactly carry the same implications the word "bias" does. Which implies they hate him because he's him, and then everything was built around that. Instead of just a proper accounting of how truly awful Trump is.

[@nr9794]

“New psychic presidential power” had my stomach hurting 😂

[@laparis27th77]

I peeped the phrasing reference which makes me suspect you're an Archer fan as well. lol. As always thanks for the thorough explanation. your videos always clear the fog for me.

[@itstheweirdguy]

I like how you are highlighting the words while you talk, very smooth!

[@Blackfire1478]

I must say I absolutely love how in these videos you can throw a ridiculous amount of information, that is way beyond my station, and yet I always feel like I have come to the end having understood and learned something 😄

[@slightlycrookedworkshop]

This entire thing is almost Reverse Kafkaesque. It's like Cannon is making Trump's arguments for him. His legal team basically says: We have an argument but we're not telling you what it is. It's the best argument. Many people are saying it's the best legal argument ever made. Don't worry about what that argument is, It's 100% correct and you should just believe it. Therefore, we win.

[@warlordofbritannia]

Meanwhile, Dearie is too old to have patience with Trump’s B.S. One of the very special masters Trump specifically asked for is telling him to put up or shut up and treating him more fairly than his own appointee. It’s poetry ☺️

[@FoodNerds]

😂😂😂😂 Right!

[@prismblack9631]

Oh no, they’re going to use the Chewbacca defense?

[@emlynselene1096]

That sounds EXACTLY like their legal arguments as to how the 2020 election was "stolen". We have evidence, you should believe we have evidence, but we're not telling you the evidence

[@stewartrussell1951]

Well laid out presentation. Very professional. Thank you.

[@KatLovelandVoiceActor]

Been waiting for your vid on this :)

[@lisaf5303]

Imagine a judge asking for evidence, what a strange world...

[@ronrendon]

😂

[@johndododoe1411]

Judge simply told them what date of the year they should present evidence of X, if they want to do so. In other words, he told them when exactly their day in court will be.

[@isaacgleeth3609]

Trump team: _makes claim_ Judge: "I'm sure you wouldn't give us this fantastic story without some proof." Trump team: _shocked Pikachu face_

[@lightknight876]

Trump organization specifically seeking that judge lady should have raised all kinds of red flags and alarm

[@JasonBoyce]

he's taken multiple cases directly to her, he also tried to get her on a case where he was suing Hillary Clinton and he's trying to get her on another case to sue Congress he used to describe the SCOTUS judges he appointed as "his" judges, and they turned down his election lawsuits, but Cannon is clearly "his" judge

[@paul16451]

Thankfully thats exactly what happened.

[@daviddivad5202]

It did.. have you not been paying attention?

[@johndododoe1411]

Trump org is in the New York case, this video is about Trump himself.

[@Billsbob]

Unlike the FBI doing the same thing by seeking out a specific political magistrate to get the warrant in the first place?

[@asherikamichaela8425]

I'm really struggling not to just roll on the ground laughing right after getting off work. 😂🤣 This is hilarious! Thanks for the explanation, LE!

[@JasonSmith-lp6wg]

I do love the seamlessness of your Sponsor Segways.

[@corporalsoletrain2132]

Don't think we didn't notice how fast and quiet you said "Cobbledick" You wanted to giggle. We saw everything

[@nydarisa]

I am continually impressed and amazed at how you can discuss some of these things with a straight face. There is not a fiction writer alive who could have come up with some of the statements that the former president has made.

[@jessiehogue.]

I mean, if they were *REALLY* high and drunk...

[@wonpilspiano]

They’d write it and readers would rage against the unrealistic nature of the story

[@jansmitowiczauthor78]

Challenge accepted :p

[@jansmitowiczauthor78]

Challenge accepted :p

[@jansmitowiczauthor78]

@@wonpilspiano That's exactly right.

[@Xgya2000]

"By just thinking about it" "Your honor, the defendant pleads Jedi"

[@deep8538]

Awesome segue to Brilliant, I might have to subscribe.

[@ExplodingDarth]

"which isn't legally relevant, but I find it very very funny" Excellent, just perfect. I love the disclaimer, I love the honesty, beautiful!

[@slimmccoy8863]

Devin's comments like this are what keep me coming back to this channel.

[@thomasdjonesn]

I said it along with him, and laughed when I realized he'd said the same thing.

[@ColinTedford]

The serious delivery really made it.

[@mattcy6591]

If he is so confident he declassified those documents, why hasn't he publicly disclosed what is in those documents?

[@pineforest1442]

I don’t think he actually read them.

[@Krushak8888]

Just because it's declassified doesn't mean it's up to be viewed by the public

[@DusilBWeeklyLeague]

I don't think he can actually read

[@violeth2255]

@Krushak I'm pretty sure that declassification either releases that information to public access automatically or enable public access via a freedom of information request.

[@DarkDragonPath]

Oh to be a fly on the wall at the DOJ's FOIA division for the figurative blizzard of FOIA requests being furiously scribbled out and submitted on all those allegedly de-classified documents... 🤣 To be clear, I'm 99.9998% positive they will all get denied buuuuut...

[@martinhorner642]

Congratulations on one of the most brilliant sponsor segways I've ever seen on KZbin. Perfect. 10 of 10.

[@margotrosendorn6371]

Okay where did you get that clip of the judge using her gavel as a bludgeon? It's HILARIOUS! XD

[@tomriley5790]

Pretty rare to see an appeals court take a judge apart quite so thoroughly...

[@jeaniebird999]

It once was a rare thing to see such incompetence...

[@Ericwvb2]

It's also pretty rare (AFAIK) for a judge, before hearing from both parties, to declare ahead of time she'll be ruling in favor of one of the parties.

[@_Aemse]

lmao well they're trumps "boys" so its not exactly like they were the most qualified people for the job. it is very gratifying to see them hung up on the cross though.

[@herec0mestheCh33f]

@@Ericwvb2 you'll notice the trump stans don't talk about that forbidden fact

[@Neddyhk]

"That's not relevant, it's just very, very funny." I said the same in a Court hearing and the Judge did not agree with me.

[@martinboland810]

the build-up to the segue is like the build-up before the drop in a great dance track

[@RogelioPerea]

Great post as always. I must object though to the brilliant... Brilliant segue 🙂

[@dexteradams6515]

Objection: Not even Brilliant can fix what's wrong with Trump and his "lawyers".

[@GREGGRCO]

Great Segue though.

[@almostfm]

Now, if there's a learning platform for them, it's probably called "Stupid".

[@patrickjordan2233]

"truth social" becoming "bankrupt social"? 🤔🤔

[@willdejong7763]

@@almostfm I was thinking “Basic”.

[@AndrewAMartin]

@Nic DeGrave Yeah, probably goes something like "Ivanka, come here, Daddy needs your help..."

[@jonathans1759]

The EMPTY classified folders are more of a worry than any of this.

[@rachelk4805]

He thought they would never bring a case? I didn't think I could be any more shocked at his entitlement, but that left me gobsmacked.

[@evehatesapples1972]

That opening line really hit me. I see the news and think, "How is this STILL happening?!"

[@gengarzilla1685]

Mr. Trump will no doubt want it to inconclusively drag for as long as possible. For that man, there's no such thing as bad publicity.

[@Tailmonsterfriend]

Oh god that clip of a judge gavelling that dude, MY SIDES!

[@rabbit3212010]

This is the ONLY contributor who's videos I slow down the speed on! Just because he talks fast doesn't mean I don't want to hear every word.

[@spikecurtin]

Please keep making videos. My friends and I love your content.

[@Vesperitis]

Dear Mr. Eagle, There is a big difference between a "Psychic President" and a "Psycho President".

[@skipads5141]

Anyone who claims to be psychic is psycho.

[@rhov-anion]

Trump thinks he's the one but is really the other.

[@ost2life]

I dunno, these days the main difference seems to be spelling.

[@johndododoe1411]

The argument wasn't a psychic power, but a claim that an unexpressed decision to declassify would be completely valid if its existence could be inferred from subsequent actions, an argument applicable to executive actions of other presidents. When Obama went on national TV to reveal that they just killed Osama bin Laden, Obama was implicitly acting on an unwritten declassification of that previously classified fact. Similarly if president Trump (while still in office) ordered the movement of certain classified documents to a less secure location, he may arguably have acted on an implicit unwritten declassification of those documents. It's a logical argument, that is only slightly stretching the truth.

[@vinylrabbit7295]

I would argue they are the same thing

[@zeebeeplayz]

Number 1 rule of a judge: be unbiased. Cannon: that sign won't stop me because I can't read!

[@AskMia411]

A+ meme usage!

[@crispychrissy]

The weird floating dust speck overlay on the video at 3:04 freaked me out. I thought there were bugs crawling on my phone screen.

[@nchnch5791]

I love how LE's lawyering comes into play when he smoothly goes from his content right into his sponsors. 😀

[@justsomeguyinnc473]

The problem with any argument or statement that starts with "Trump said..." is that it doesn't matter what he says. Frankly, I'm astonished that this keeps getting trotted out. (I'm not really, I know that "news" is really entertainment when there's a profit motive.) TLDR: When a person with no credibility speaks, only a fool listens.

[@erikdayne5429]

Fools, or those who simply want to believe what they’re being told.

[@johndoe6032]

Yeah it doesn't really matter what he says in Fox News. He could say he murdered someone and it wouldn't have any legal weight. Fox "News" is a great example of that. They have news in the title of the channel, but when faced with legal issues, they say in court they're an entertainment company, not a news provider. Additionally, they say under oath that no reasonable person would believe some assertions they "report on" to avoid legal liability. The saddest part is, every one of their viewers could be made aware of this, and still gulp down their kool-aid.

[@karlr750]

It *does* matter what he says. That man is a never-ending fountain of self-incriminating statements and he Just. Cannot. Keep. His. Mouth. Shut.

[@pumpkinknight5732]

@@johndoe6032 pretty sure back in the day it was actually titled as "Fox Entertainment News", can't imagine why they shortened it.

[@ALaz502]

Dude. Your production quality is getting off the charts good. It has always been good. But this is next level man.

[@dariusslade4953]

I really, really, really enjoyed your explanations. Thanks!

[@rneumeye]

15:17 The most HILARIOUS segue into an ad EVER! 😅🤣😭

[@Nortekman]

It was great beatdown, a big beautiful beat down, a powerful beatdown, even; and frankly, it was the first ever beatdown. I been told it was the first big powerful beatdown. Did you know that? Yeah, not a lot of people know that.

[@TheRealScooterGuy]

I see what you did there!

[@craigejacobs]

For future reference, that dude should simply be referred to as "Mike Pillow"

[@rickee2652]

That segway into the brilliant ad made me lol

[@jongroskin729]

That segue into the sponsor was brilliant! Brains working correctly..🤣

[@acuyra]

It never ceases to amaze me how little Trump seems to understand of what a President can and can’t do, despite being one for four years.

[@ShinyAvalon]

When you've spent your life getting whatever you want by being the loudest and most abrasive, learning what "limits" are just doesn't compute.

[@williamlulay7982]

Trump never wanted to be "President." He wanted to be King/ Dictator/ Autocrat/ Whatever, which, in his little pea brain, meant having unlimited power. He has little knowledge of the actual workings of government, never had any interest in learning, and has, indeed, remained remarkably stupid over how the government actually works. He still doesn't realize how proscribed ALL government functions are by rules and regulations, which is why he keeps making totally inappropriate and incriminating statements and actions, which, while they wouldn't affect the average citizen, will get him, as a former government official, in very hot water. Sometimes, a person's stupidity is a blessing!

[@lauridsd]

He simply does not / will not / can not acknowledge any limitation to his power or ability, including, you know...the law...reality...whatever.

[@_Jake.From.Statefarm_]

Listen to the Alyssa Griffin PBS interview.. It's insane, the PBS documentary is really good and broken down into interview segments.

[@karlr750]

At the beginning of Trump's presidency, he was given some crib notes on the Bill of Rights, so he could understand them before taking the oath of office. According to what I heard (and this might be partially apocryphal), he got through #4 (unreasonable search & seizure) before he got bored and gave up. If a U.S. office holder lacks the mental fortitude to read the Bill of Rights, plus amendments 11-27, then it does not surprise me that there are significant limitations to his understanding.

[@TheSteveBoyd]

When you're effortlessly explaining the minutiae of something like this, that I'm genuinely interested in understanding, I find it helps to turn the playback down to 75% speed. This has the unintended (and kind of hilarious) effect of making you sound completely hammered. 😂

[@Leith_Crowther]

Knowledgeable people can explain complicated things simply.

[@AskMia411]

Thank you for This knowledge

[@joshlamont]

Oh, my God, I was laughing so hard through this entire video. Thank you for that play by play!

[@NP-sd9md]

That judge attacks b-roll😂

[@MrFoxtheSpy]

After watching your channel for a couple of years, I've come to the conclusion that becoming a lawyer is much easier than I thought. I just need some friends in high places.

[@rhov-anion]

Nah, that's how you become a JUDGE.

[@MrFoxtheSpy]

@@rhov-anion very true, very true. That's also a possibility

[@0816M3RC]

@@MrFoxtheSpy All right then go be a lawyer.

[@KingBrandonm]

It can't be that difficult if Sidney Powell, Alina Habba, Christina Bobb and all the other bottom feeding dregs of society that Trump appoints to his loser legal team passed the bar.

[@neolexiousneolexian6079]

"I'm not questioning your honour, Ser, I'm denying its existence." ....Y'all should build a Wall to send people who "have friends in high places" to. Maybe not up North, though, speaking as your neighbour.

[@jowilson5581]

Hi Mr. Stone! I have a favor to ask: could you please provide a link to the case you're reviewing, when you do these? I really enjoy reading court documents (missed my calling as a lawyer, haha), and would love to go over them myself as well as watch your take on it. Granted, I can search it up myself (and in this case, I already have), but this would save me the effort of doing so. If it's a pain, don't worry about it. Just figured I'd ask.

[@36cowboysintotalatramranch]

This! I wish media companies would link the courtlistener page or something. Sick and tired of having to search for a filing to read it

[@karanpatel7815]

He probably gets his cases off of westlaw or Lexis nexis, so people without a subscription to these sites won't be able to access the cases even if he puts a link to it. Obviously important landmark cases are available free online, but cases on more niche areas of the law usually aren't

[@ooooneeee]

​@@karanpatel7815 all of those court decisions should be in the public domain and free to access for everyone. they were made by people whose paycheck came from taxes.

[@Metrion77]

I mean, he includes the case number. I just googled the case number for nken vs holder and got plenty of returns.

[@jmwild1]

@@ooooneeee Court decisions are in the public domain, but imaging them and hosting them online is not a taxpayer-driven service. That's why Westlaw and LexisNexis charge for this service.

[@NSA-admin]

I heard that stifled laugh with that Brilliant ad intro. Definitely top tier ad segue.

[@alexadelaide]

I always feel like the segue to the ad spot leaves the main subject with no closure