Your slander against the flavor of junior mints and all who enjoy them will not stand I challenge you to a dual, sir

Say what suits does legal eagle wear?

Auditory hypersensitivity warnings 8:59 weird high-pitched sound

Having a 4.0 means you ace EVERYTHING including general ed requirements that everyone takes (math, history, English, science, etc.) You can’t have a 4.0 and coast your way through college.

The parents weren't the only ones to ignore his behaviour.. Why not also try the teachers, who clearly saw the same warning signs and made no effort to find Ethan help???

I am ignorant of the actual history of why the Electoral College was adopted into the Constitution, but I can understand why the founders might have done it. The Presidential/VP ticket is the only nationwide race. Of the 13 original colonies there was significant disparity in the population numbers. Those colonies with low population numbers felt that they would basically have no voice in straight democratic elections, always being out-voted by the larger northern colonies. Hence, to get everyone to sign onto the Constitution, the Electoral College was devised. I call it the population equalizer. And I agree with it. Now the population disparity is mostly between urban(blue) vs rural(red), with the purple suburban areas being battleground areas.

Tom Cruise would've been in the Brig with the Colonel lol

Flight information is publicly available. He just saves people the trouble of looking out up themselves. Nothing to see here, TayTay

Cancer kills OJ. Cancer then writes book, "If I did it."

I have come to believe if you want to know what he is up to just read what he is accusing his enemies of doing and that is pretty much what he is doing under the table.

Most lawyers like to get paid for their efforts. Trump has stiffed so many most no longer think the notoriety is payment enough.

don the con

You lost all credibility when you said that Charlie wasn't a legal expert in Bird Law.

Corporal punishment is barbaric in any form.

But... Honey comes from the flower's nectar not pollen...

I have a feeling this is the type of guy that would waive a Palestinian flag while wearing a LGBTQIA+ rainbow shirt and an I voted for Joe Biden button participating at a Liam Thomas swimming event.

Literally anything can kill anyone, provided it's applied by dangerous means or dosage.

I'd love to see an update of this. Because she did basically everything that was expected to postpone, postpone, postpone. I'd love to hear Devon and his writers comment their perspective on why Judge Cannon

I would guess the reason it doesn't taste very sweet is because caffeine is bitter, the sweetness of the sugar is probably being balanced out by bitterness of the caffeine.

“In America, it is your inalienable right to look like an idiot.”

I feel bad because I am fairly sure I drink almost 400mg of Caffeine on a day at work where I haven’t gotten enough sleep… Though I do not have a heart condition or anything that could be aggravated by it.

As a panera employee I did not know how much caffeine was in the charged sips before the lawsuit, though immediately after we moved the charged drinks behind the counter and began telling anyone who was interested that this drink that it had a dangerous amount of caffeine

Jury Nullification! She confessed to the murder, they know they're guilty, and decide to find them intentionally acquitted.

Every accusation, you say?

My lawyer for many years and no one should believe him or take him seriously! - Donald John Drumpf

While the last scene of the direct examination is great from a legal perspective, I can't help but gush over it from a writing perspective as well. The entire movie, she is desperately trying to help her boyfriend, she wants him to succeed, and is giving him all the help she can provide, but she simply isn't capable of it. Even the pictures she takes are done "incorrectly" and her constant badgering and asking him what she can do to help gets on his already worn out nerves. Then at the end, he realized that the pictures he berated her for taking badly, shows the perfect bit of evidence he needed to win the case, and even though she is still angry at him he calls for her expert testimony. You can watch the transformation of her attitude the moment she realizes what he wants her to see and she is back on his team, providing the support she has been anxious to give the entire movie and ecstatic that he is relying on her. It is such a beautiful character scene.

DONALD TRUMP GONNA NEED JAYOMA ON THE CASE ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

TALK ABOUT JAYOMA

In the military a person is presumed guilty until proven innocent

However, i was also told that if someone does not want his/her photo taken, they can ask you to delete it....

No freedom of speech

Omg, the satire article about eating children... That is why I felt like I've read similar stuff, it's in my AP practice exam! (For english)

Henry Fonda. Not Peter.... Why am I fact checking a 5 year old video?

This is all BS!

Now report how Fani Willis is now facing being disbarred and charged with felony misuse of funds. Go on I dare you to cover actual facts about these corrupt fascists.

It's not that I agree with abortion laws I actually do agree with them for personal reasons but that's not the reason. My argument is that abortion can't be legal as all women's rights can't be legal. It's not just an argument to the Bill of Rights as you say. Also an argument to common law which does not grant women personhood to begin with anyone who is human by biology who is of the female gender. Any rights whatsoever. I literally mean gender and sex interchangeably here because I'm not going to get into that right now. But it never gives them any rights to begin with. Nor does it grant them personhood. I'm not saying that I agree that women are not people I'm saying that legally they were never people to begin with. The other thing is that by sheer crac but the logical deduction that you know of as a lawyer. You have to argue that they can't have it because otherwise I George the third that's my name and I am a direct line to King George III when do the ironic thing where if I were to hold power I could or even now I could simply just say I feel that I should be absolute King dictator and monarchroll this country with an iron fist and a knowledge of lunacy and nonsensical nest humor. Make people do ridiculous s***that's for my own sick amusement. Now you might say that that's a far stretch but the same thing is here. Just because I feel I have the right to be king does not give me the right to be king. Any more than being related to the king that tried to enslave the colonists or tried to force the college to do whatever he wanted to do. None of that gives me the right or do I have the right to enforce any law that is not that is not backed by other initial laws that we govern our country we can't just make laws out of nowhere we can't just make laws for no reason we can't just make constitutional amendments wherever we want or wherever we feel like it otherwise I just have the right I feel that I have the right to be absolute King dictator in monarch I should be able to do whatever the f*** I want and everyone else you have to file before me and everyone else you have to relinquish their rights so that I can just do whatever the hell I want. You see you can't just make laws just to do it there has to be a formal process

Again it does not have to be just the Bill of Rights but the reality is it's not held by any of our founding documents at all we're not just talking about the Bill of Rights were talking about even the common law support that or any women's rights forget women's rights to an abortion they don't have any rights at all if we're to follow the laws of the way they're supposed to be. And I'm not saying that as a woman hater I'm literally saying that as a person whose name is King George III that is my name my name is George the third if I I am a direct line to King George III himself through Lord Byron who is my great-great-grandfather that means King George III is my great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfather hi George III would therefore have the right to if I had enough people backing me to make a constitutional amendment that declares me absolute monarch dictator and King.because apparently the abortion people think that because you feel a certain way that that gives you the right to write laws regardless of how they're actually written that you can just make a law or an amendment whenever you want to which you cannot do that is illegal. And if and if you say well my feelings matter well I feel I should be absolute dictator King and monarch and should rule with an iron fist. See it doesn't make sense democracy has to be uphold by the rule of law. And therefore laws are there for limited by sheer logical deduction. In such a manner you never write a law unless it's based on previous law especially common law. And even common law disagrees with a woman's personhood. There is no part of it that says a man who is of African descent or a man who's of native American descent has no rights. There's no law that says that but there is a law that says all women in this country and really anywhere have no rights and and if you disagree with me well then I wanted to declare my constitutional right to be absolute King dictator and absolute monarch rule this country with an iron fist burn all copies of the Constitution and declare everyone who dares to oppose me an enemy of the State and force them to wear a purple hat on Tuesdays and Sundays and report directly to jail where they will receive death by a million paper cuts after after being tickle tortured upside down with a feather

1st world problems

You're forgetting to add the fact that women were never included in the Constitution to begin with. In fact it never States in any of the founding documents that women have. It says it says all men are created equal. Distinctly. You can make the argument that black men are just as equal as white men but you can't say women are equal as men legally under the Constitution. So not only do women not have the right to an abortion if you're going to follow the Constitution to its teeth they don't have any rights at all. There is the 14th the amendment to the Constitution but it's in the direct opposition to the Constitution itself. So if women have the right to an abortion or really any rights at all. George Byron Kaknes III have the right to say if I were to ever take office as any political person would under the same logic. The ability to create a constitutional amendment that gives me the right to be absolute dictator King and monarch of the of the this great nation. To enforce laws with no impunity or really anyone standing in my way to say what I can do. List of course I obviously can't docan't do for the exact same reasons that women cannot have an abortion or really have any right. You can't just make a constitutional amendment out of nowhere you have to make a constitutional argument and the Bill of Rights and other earlier works such as the inalienable rights life liberty and the pursuit of happiness are also in that argument so you have to be able to make those are. No life comes before Liberty because you can't have Liberty if you don't have life Liberty comes before pursuit of happiness cuz you can't have a pursuit of happiness if you don't have. So the argument it's either the woman's Liberty or the baby's life while life comes before Liberty so the woman's automatically drop. There's no argument you can make that a woman has the right to an abortion also no argument you can make that says that a woman has has any rights whatsoever to make any decision especially if she has no husband. I'm not saying this to be pig-headed and I know it sounds that way I'm just saying that there are no laws that protect women that are actually sound constitutional law common law does not protect women as it was never meant to protect women in the first place. The laws are not meant to protect women they're meant to protect men and only men.

BIAS MUCH!?

Interesting how the U.S. which is well-known to pump milk with dangerous hormones becomes hysterical when it comes to cheese. Almost as if the U.S. government are massive hypocrites.

Legal in the US, illegal in most other first world counties: hundreds of different food ingredients. Like the shit in Mountain Dew.

I thought his victims were dead

The Chinese need to realize we all don’t live in a communist country like they do.

As a Nebraskan I am proud of Ernie Chambers. What a troll move.

Welp

So perhaps my understanding of this is wrong, but I was under the impression this was NOT the copying of any code by Google, but copying of the API. Oracle owns the rights to Java, and anyone who wants to create Java applications uses the Java API to interface with any functionality Java provides for applications to use. However this goes both ways.. Anyone can write their own implementation of the API and if they do it correctly in theory they can run any Java app on their own system without Oracle's involvement. This is sort of what Google did (though it was for Android apps written in Java and wasn't intended for just any Java app). So I am not sure I would use the word "copy" though maybe I missed some aspect of it. Maybe Oracle was assuming Google copied code rather than performing legal black box reverse engineering. At any rate, no matter which side of the API you're on, you can write code to integrate with some system that sits on the other side of the API. This is the part that is a bit scary if it had come out in Oracle's favor. If they can go after anyone writing code that implements one side of the API, could they go after anyone writing normal Java apps they don't like? There is a subtle difference there but would it matter?

She's a billionaire. She has attorneys and financial advisors

Worse part is that a murderer was validated by millions because he was a beloved celebrity