Trump Vows to End Birthright Citizenship. How will it Impact Indians? | Vantage with Palki Sharma

Trump Vows to End Birthright Citizenship. How will it Impact Indians? | Vantage with Palki Sharma
Donald Trump’s grandfather, Friedrich Trump, immigrated to the U.S. in 1885 in search of a better life. Today, Trump wants to end birthright citizenship, a privilege his family benefited from. What would this mean for immigrants and America’s future? How will this move affect Indian-Americans? Palki Sharma tells you.
---
Donald Trump | US Citizenship | Birthright Citizenship | US Visa | Firstpost | World News | News Live | Vantage | Palki Sharma | News
#trump #uscitizenship #usvisa #indianamericans #firstpost #vantageonfirstpost #palkisharma #worldnews
Vantage is a ground-breaking news, opinions, and current affairs show from Firstpost. Catering to a global audience, Vantage covers the biggest news stories from a 360-degree perspective, giving viewers a chance to assess the impact of world events through a uniquely Indian lens.
The show is anchored by Palki Sharma, Managing Editor, Firstpost.
By breaking stereotypes, Vantage aims to challenge conventional wisdom and present an alternative view on global affairs, defying the norm and opening the door to new perspectives. The show goes beyond the headlines to uncover the hidden stories - making Vantage a destination for thought-provoking ideas.
Vantage airs Monday to Friday at 9 PM IST on Firstpost across all leading platforms.
​
Subscribe to Firstpost channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.
/ @firstpost
Follow Firstpost on Instagram:
/ firstpost
Follow Firstpost on Facebook:
/ firstpostin
Follow Firstpost on Twitter:
/ firstpost
Follow Firstpost on WhatsApp:
www.whatsapp.c...

[@kylebags81]

Incorrect. He said that if you were illegal, and had a child in the US, he would close the loophole for that child to get automatic US citizenship.

[@mariarosales6044]

The constitution has to be amended

[@jasonkruse2553]

@@mariarosales6044it doesn’t.. the Supreme Court just needs to interpret it differently.

[@jasonkruse2553]

@@mariarosales6044’the right to bear arms shall not be abridged’… but for some reason I still can’t own a tank

[@NURREDIN]

@@jasonkruse2553 Have you read the Constitution? The part of the Constitution that guarantees citizenship is the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, also known as the Citizenship Clause, which states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

[@jasonkruse2553]

@@NURREDIN yeah well aware. The Supreme Court just needs to interpret it differently. No amendment is necessary. There are restrictions to free speech and gun ownership as well due to interpretations. Executive action, lawsuit, Supreme Court rules only applies to legal immigrants… done. No laws or amendments necessary

[@AguiarMelwyn]

Why is Firstpost acting like the stupid woke media by not representing facts correctly. Trump spoke about this and it was to do with illegal immigration not legal immigration. This is stupid Firstpost.

[@AfroGlobal]

Isn't this Indian lady known for being a hardcore woke feminist. What did you expect?

[@airavata7]

You need to get your facts right. Its not for illegal immigrants alone. He also said for legal immigrants as well. According to him at least one of the parent should be Citizen or have a permanent resident permit. Anyways, he won't be successful in constitutional amendment. Don't worry.

[@AguiarMelwyn]

@@airavata7yeah fact checker I have written in the context of this video where it shows potentially 1.6 million Indians origins born in US to see a risk to their citizenship which is incorrect. I understand he spoke about only Citizens and PR holders children’s will continue to have the opp for birthright citizenship but he has not spoken about retrofitting his policy on the child of person with visa. Nevertheless it’s an uphill task that might never see the light of the day.

[@Sandra-k6t]

What Does The Law Say. Don't Start changing The )Legality OF The Laws 😊

[@danielwarhaft2075]

Watch your mouth? Who the hell do you think you are. Your criminal donald trump will get his ass kicked so hard. He's playing god.

[@minxiyer]

Firstpost gets it wrong. President elect Trump said - abolishing birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants; not legal immigrants. He could further propose at least one of the parents need to be a green card holder or a US citizen for the child to have birthright citizenship, which is absolutely fair.

[@brianburgess3231]

then your lost on the law and the logic .. you just contradicted yourself

[@timothylee2772]

I think that's fair. It promotes law and order. Because the status quo with birthright citizenship is just abusing the law and the immigration system.

[@revivalarchives5667]

You got it bro

[@DennistheMenace2011]

.......and shut down the birth tourism industry. Or better yet, send them to Canada.

[@0m3ga27-atx]

Ideally, that would be a logical process. However, there are fears that it may start out like that and end up a more extreme version of that idea.

[@shanthiniananth1300]

90% of US people they have a birth citizenship they are original from Irish and Africa.but only the red Indian is origin

[@ByronMacleod-r9p]

orange from new England

[@yaphonghor4409]

By right, only the American Natives can be the president of USA!

[@mgr001]

@@ByronMacleod-r9p green, from Ireland

[@theawesomeman9821]

indigenous people in America are known as Natives or Native Americans. They don't like being called "Red Indians". My friend from Gujarat learned that after offending a Cherokee in America.

[@youneverknow8974]

Them Red Indians are black Americans who were here way before Mongolian Indian came over here.

[@NorthernCosmos]

Birthright citizenship should only be for only legal immigrants. Let's understand it this way

[@airavata7]

That is not what he said, he said, at the least one of the parent should be Citizen or have a permanent resident permit.

[@TeranRealtor]

@@airavata7 Birthright citizenship SHOULD only be for citizens' and green card holders' newborns. These are the only two groups of people who can be drafted by the USA - and are therefore "subject to the jurisdiction". President Trump's interpretation IS how it was intended when written. He's not "changing" it - he is making a correction to the abuse that's been going on.

[@GLOVENT]

@@airavata7 What about those children who were born to non-US Citizen and non-PR holder parents on US Soil ? will their US Citizenship be revoked from the past or will it be applicable to future cases only ?

[@rosyralte168]

He should… Atleast one parent should be citizen.. i think this is what many EU countries also follows

[@Serge-cm5my]

Citizen or have a permanent resident permit.

[@abbaemmanuel3450]

Yes that is what he said at least one parent has to be citizens, he disagrees with the procedures where anyone born here without either parent being citizen to become citizens by birth

[@జైతెలుగు]

One parent must be native american*

[@Ramarao02]

@@జైతెలుగు sandhu dorikannapudu alla iragodutunnav sivaji 🔥🔥

[@k-dwanks2481]

America is a migrant society, apart from the indigenous people The rest are of other native land Let others breath

[@Diagonal3375]

If all the citizens of other countries work with the intention of making their countries better I dont think thisnwill be an issue

[@b.p.r.k7119]

@@Diagonal3375 Funny thing to hear from the nation who is record holder for the most war mongering in history... Think back a bit about all the countries you attacked in the name of yr version of democracy (Democracy my a**❗).

[@vinithagodbole6321]

With the excuse of democracy, The 5 eyes should stop interfering in other countries for these countries to thrive... eg.. imdia is growing so see the amount of covert destabilizing action being taken by "wh!tes" in india

[@graceacquah246]

The USA won't allow them, they enjoy us being dependant on them

[@anm_15]

There were times when America needed immigrants but now its not the time. USA is already overwhelmed with immigrants in current time. So I am with Trump on this decision.

[@Brodeman08]

Plus we're overloaded at the border.

[@anm_15]

@@Brodeman08 Yes, USA does not need people for next 50 years atleast now. Not just USA - Canada, UK also do not need people for next 100 years.

[@cappymom706]

My son was born here in the UNITED STATES. His father was born in Michigan. I was already a citizen when he was born. This is what President Trump approves of If you came in as parents illegally your child has no birthright to be a citizen I hope this makes it crystal clear for you the meaning of legal and illegal persons Sneaking in here does not make your child a US CITIZEN

[@jimmyl8332]

Only legal migrant should have birthright citizenship!

[@Vann20F]

Or people that have connections like Melania and her parents 😂😂

[@b.p.r.k7119]

You mean Native Americans 😅😅😅😅

[@jomckellan]

@@b.p.r.k7119 There are no natives to this land.

[@jimmyl8332]

Yes, Native Americans are legal citizens of the United States.

[@Vann20F]

@@b.p.r.k7119 what are you talking about 1. If you are her first how can you be a migrant let alone migrate some where And AMERICA was named by immigrants Or is that wrong also See what happens when they stop teaching facts in school You end up with a man that hates immigrants Married two hahahah

[@rashius]

October 7, 1885.. Then shows a plane taking off. You know the first plane ever flew in 1903 right?

[@mohamedcamara8785]

He came on the boat illegally…

[@revivalarchives5667]

This got me 😂 like seriously. Like we are all fools? Media, they just make us laugh these days

[@cristiano_atleti7728]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@RommelsAsparagus]

Yes, a large turbofan jet no less...circa 1985. LOL.

[@vijisxyz]

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

[@jonscott234]

Talking about America first on a country they stole

[@rams4life277]

😅😅😅😅

[@NekoNebula1313]

Boo hoo 😂😂😂

[@jitulvslife03]

Wars were fought. Not stolen. If you cannot defend your homeland then its likely to be lost. Law of nature.

[@spacebatstuckonearth8888]

And they developed the country to become USA, lazy people will turn it into africa.

[@andermancan942]

Tell me about it.... Yes wars were fought yet in school... those wars were never taught. Identities were switched & to blend in... Settlers got hitched. This land was stolen & its still "Occupied." Half a truth is still a whole lie. 💯✌🏾

[@vijayjayaraman5990]

Even India requires at least one parent to be an Indian citizen for the child to get Indian citizenship. India stopped giving citizenship by birth back in the 80s or 90s.

[@chandra_has]

Ya people waiting in line to get one 😂

[@vijayjayaraman5990]

@chandra_has That's not the point. Very few countries offer unconditional birthright citizenship. Even India has removed it. Why wouldn't the US remove it?

[@vijayrangarajanramakrishna318]

​​@@vijayjayaraman5990US is the land of worldwide immigrants unlike India

[@vinaypenta4391]

@@vijayjayaraman5990 you can keep calm Vijay just let it flow you are not the one to point out

[@roysondsouza0309]

Like people really care about Indian citizenship except foreign criminals and outlaws.

[@X.A.V.l.E.R.]

Same in Europe... You don't get citizenship by birth in EU

[@amyabay4826]

Yep. Or anywhere else... only in US

[@amlovinglife]

How did you get that then?

[@AlanLe-p6n]

No airplanes in 1885. People took a ship to the USA from Europe.

[@bladekhaira]

no ships in year 20000000BC people flew with dinosaurs

[@danielblue4460]

Your very changed too from than time. Even here in the Philippines, lots of Chinese were arriving by boat up to the early 1940's before the 2nd WW.

[@RommelsAsparagus]

Yeah, that made me laugh. Steamship in 1885.

[@జైతెలుగు]

Yes dont give citizenship for any one besides native americans

[@brownadam999]

Lol

[@danpoole5721]

Facts

[@Johntgma]

This will never happen keep dreaming.

[@k-dwanks2481]

Even Donald trump is not native to America lol I hope you know what native means

[@vijaikumar7445]

America will have population about 10 million😅😅😅

[@dallassegno]

If you're indian, then it won't affect you at all. You'll all be happily sent to India. If you're american, with Indian ancestry, you'll be happily allowed to stay in America.

[@timelyferry]

High time americans put themselves first.

[@sahilprasai9869]

More like a descendant of colonizers

[@petem9994]

What a cheap shot Palki. Using trump father in this video. You're no good! Ending Birthright Citizen is critical for America to maintain it's identity. Too many unregulated and illegal persons WHO ARE INCAPABLE OF ASSIMILATION within the US culture, Laws, and customs wants to be here just so they can bilk the system FINANCIALLY and claiming all sorts of reasons such as wanting a better life...Bullshit!

[@peeyar2000]

All legal immigrants should get birth right citizenship. Not illegals.

[@mohamedcamara8785]

You talking about Native Americans…

[@Dabeachguy]

@@mohamedcamara8785😂😂😂

[@Mrde488]

Lately, Palki is famously known for her incorrect information and criticizing others 😂

[@garrylum6025]

Trump snr must have come by plane. Now i’ll get it when he say we’re retake the airports.

[@raymondthomas1570]

Not lately..she has few on her list

[@Pointdexter1]

AFAIK its from the begining ......🤣

[@Ladykiesh]

Vivek pushing for it more then Trump

[@rajeshx1983]

Only indians know the pulse😂😂😂

[@MarianDiaconu-uk5cd]

If Vivek is pushing for the deportation of illegal immigrants from endia he is in deed a real american and a patriot ...kudos to him...💕💕💕👍👍👍👍

[@faidbaksh8481]

The USA constitution is supreme: The 14th amendment says you can gain citizenship ‘with jurisdictions’. Being illegal in USA has NO jurisdiction therefore one who is illegal in USA and have a child in USA will not be illegible for birthright citizenship if the 14th amendment is challenged for clarification. Ukraine and Israel both have restricted birthright citizenship, as do Egypt, Sudan, Iran, Pakistan and India. Suriname lacks a birthright citizenship policy, and Colombia has a restricted policy. The Bahamas & Haiti do not have a birthright citizenship policy, also the Dominican Republic who do not give citizenship if the parents are illegals.

[@obajuluwaoluwatomisin3883]

Its a well known tactic in Nigeria. If you hv money, visit America few times, time your pregnancy such that you are in America during childbirth and boom, you hv a child thats American citizen. That means full American rights for the child and easy access to America for the parents of the "American" citizen.

[@adamx284]

Naija pipo and cho cho cho. No be everything u must cast🙄

[@adamx284]

Na everything tin wuna must talk?

[@giftfolique464]

Bro delete this comment and stop tagging ur country in a bad light. Every country does this. If you want your children to have dual citizenship or a different nationally from you, you can give birth to them abroad. Not just a Nigerian thing

[@Awesome_Wonders]

Olodo....eranko....omo ale ni e. Ogidi omo ale Yoruba ni e pelu!!!! Naija o ti se to awon Indians, Chinese, Mexicans, Philippines, Pakistanis, etc. Mi o ro pe eni kankan ti lo si ilu oyinbo ri ninu family yin!! Baba nla wereyyy....

[@obajuluwaoluwatomisin3883]

Lmao. Yall asking believing I'm wrong is one of the reasons why Nigeria is run down. Yall believe in cutting corners and exploiting all means if it benefits you regardless if it harms others. If it was truly a good or honourable thing, then why hide it? You say don't tarnish the image of your country, I say the truth is the truth and I'll never be afraid of saying it.

[@NobleOne9999]

If i was born in China would I be a citizen no

[@felixthecat2786]

My grandmother's parents were born in Italy. I guess my 99 year old grandmother is not going to be a United States citizen anymore.

[@ghostbansurvivor6229]

Trump's mother was born in Scotland, his paternal grandfather was born in Germany, all but one of his children were born to foreign born mothers.

[@skratta]

being born in the USA during 1885 for birthright citizenship is not the same as being born in 2024 for birthright citizenship

[@ArterifikCollective]

😂😂 how is it different?

[@kK-yb8rd]

Yes, birthright American citizenship in 1885 is very different from 2024 due to the historical, social, and legal context surrounding citizenship and immigration in the United States during these periods. Here's a brief comparison: 1885 Context 1. Legal Framework: The 14th Amendment (ratified in 1868) granted birthright citizenship to individuals born in the U.S., primarily aimed at ensuring citizenship for formerly enslaved people. Immigration was less regulated, with no federal oversight until the late 19th century (e.g., the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 targeted specific groups). 2. Social and Demographic Context: America was seen as a land of opportunity for immigrants from Europe, with less restrictive entry policies. Native-born citizenship often came without much controversy, although racial and ethnic minorities (e.g., Native Americans and Chinese immigrants) faced significant exclusions from full citizenship rights. 3. Documentation: Birth records were often informal or non-existent in some regions, making citizenship less formalized for native-born individuals. --- 2024 Context 1. Legal Framework: Birthright citizenship is still guaranteed under the 14th Amendment. Immigration laws and enforcement are far more complex and regulated, reflecting modern concerns about national security, economic impact, and illegal immigration. 2. Social and Political Context: Birthright citizenship is a politically debated topic, with discussions about its relevance in today's globalized world. There is a greater focus on the rights and responsibilities of citizens versus non-citizens, including debates on "birth tourism" or undocumented immigrants having U.S.-born children. 3. Documentation: Births are meticulously recorded, and birth certificates are essential for proving citizenship. Citizenship status is linked to numerous legal and social systems, such as passports, taxes, and federal benefits. In short, while the principle of birthright citizenship remains the same, its societal implications, challenges, and administration have evolved significantly from 1885 to 2024. ​@user-fl5fn7ev4q

[@Keke-vs7gm]

That birthright was pertaining to black slaves who wasn't seen as citizens but property only. It was never intended for the other people. They aren't even slaves; they are coming over here voluntarily as illegals!

[@tokouatonga7914]

What the 🫣🙀are you talking about lol 🤦🏻‍♀️ But seriously, please explain yourself, I might be missing something. Thanks

[@kK-yb8rd]

@tokouatonga7914 i just copy pasted a bunch of information. If u don't understand it then you go watch cnn or something. Better for you.

[@alpark3024]

claim executive order to end birthright citizenship

[@ajkulac9895]

Constitution > executive order

[@Tube-You357]

Only birthright citizenship should be kept for legal immigrants

[@mohamedcamara8785]

For native Americans

[@KingSargon96]

Yeah free the native americans 🇺🇸

[@truth9415]

what if 1 parent is legal? Does the child become 50% half-citizen? Or will the child be deported, despite being born in the country like You.

[@Keke-vs7gm]

​@@mohamedcamara8785They migrated here as well from Asia!

[@AllyCMa]

After 5 generations

[@Frustrated_Cowboy_Fan]

He has the Congress and the Supreme Court he's about to redefine America

[@Manofwar-d5q]

No he can't end It.

[@jamesdunning8650]

Sure he can. It's called the Supreme court.

[@ferrari6948]

The people is not going to let that happen that's what makes America great

[@RommelsAsparagus]

Um, no one flew on a jet on a one way ticket in 1885. It was obviously steamship passage. :D

[@RaymondTorres.49ers]

You have to legalized in America are an American born here for people to have legal citizens ship. So if I get a illegal immigrant pregnant my children because of me being an American is a legal citizens. Now two illegal citizens who have a child in America so that child is an illegal citizens still. Why because they are trying to use the law about not breaking families up to gain legal citizens ship. If that was the case then everyone who come to America and have children so they can't get deported. There has to be a law that prevents this from happening so Those that are coming to America and filing the right paperwork to be an American will have the opportunity. I'm for a law that will prevent people coming to America and having kids so they can stay. I'm American Mexican and I believe people from Mexico should by filling out the right paperwork to become American citizens not illegal.

[@Brodeman08]

I agree, immigration is such a complicated issue. We need immigration but at the same time we can't have too much of it. You have to work towards becoming a citizen plus immigrants need to get the knowledge they need in order to become a citizen which is kind of how you get your driver's license.

[@MrToni-c3r]

That will will be so good for the wite people

[@jamesdunning8650]

Means we have a chance to save our country.

[@patidarinstitute]

0:39. How will it or how it will 🤞

[@kaioser]

We need to end this loophole of birthright citizenship!

[@rishabha11]

2:51 simply he will do it in a way which allows people before the bill/amendment passes to continue with their citizenship

[@HwnDragon1]

What does it mean for Hawaii residents that were born when our islands were still a territory?

[@Brodeman08]

Also what about Puerto Rico? Are they going to ignore that Puerto Ricans are US citizens?

[@rohanperera7328]

That should have done long time ago

[@jadonmesfun6479]

Seriously. Half of the Mexicans in USA already took advantage of this loophole 😂😂😂

[@rs218]

Firstpost seems very concerned about far right everywhere but in India 😛 Ask such tough questions to Indian politicians

[@minaximoti7992]

100% CORRECT EXIT BIRTH RIGHT CITIZEN SHIP

[@RobN-x4j]

Hope he can terminate the citizenship of Indians who cheated in the h1b visa poll.

[@woontew9157]

they have jetliners in the year 1885!

[@MagarethWoods]

With everything going on investing in alternate income streams should be the top priority for everyone right now. especially given the global economic crisis we are currently experiencing. stocks, gold, silver, and virtual currencies are still attractive investments at the moment.

[@MeaganGood-yn9wp]

You are absolutely right 💯

[@MeaganGood-yn9wp]

Everyone needs more than their salary to be financial stable. The best thing to do with your money is to invest it rightly, because money left for saving always end up used with no returns.

[@MagarethWoods]

Cryptocurrency/stock investment, but you will need a professional guide on that.

[@MagarethWoods]

Facebook 👇

[@MagarethWoods]

Evelyn C. Sanders

[@faidbaksh8481]

INDIA & PAKISTAN HAVE RESTRICTIONS ON WHO GETS BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP.

[@gastronomistmd5078]

H1B birth right citizenship last 20th years .. JAI HO

[@gigler1990]

To eradicate a law in the constitution will only open the door for others to eradicate other laws from the constitution, such as the second amendment. You cannot have it both ways where one believes and argues in the constitution, and argues for second amendment rights but then turn around and eradicate a law from the constitution that they do not like.

[@Cvr1963]

Right of citizenship by birth of children of legal immigrants cannot be done in any way.

[@DannyLucas-tb7lr]

He can change it

[@irvingberlin8489]

Did Palki choose the video of an airplane landing in 1885?

[@DxvidGolixth]

Its Native-Americans right? Not like people from New Delhi right?

[@jadonmesfun6479]

Use common sense

[@Ambatt001]

Yes if he said, he will do it. No comprises

[@tobon619]

In 1924, Natives became legal. Before that, they were, Iligal? They offspring are legal, right? Or whats the deal.

[@shrilekhaa]

This is not new, Europe , Gulf countries and many more have same rule .

[@chaz4609]

Jai Hind. We Indians had also given births in the 5Eyes. But the Trumpet now only want Doge minded as citizens.

[@MichaelMorse-q2f]

Birth right is not in the constitution

[@Ladykiesh]

It is

[@gameplayer8998]

Did you not watch the video or are you missing a brain?

[@gilbertmalisa8700]

Guys weren’t planes invented in 1909🤷‍♂️?

[@brianjohnston4207]

Not on his own, but he can work with congress to get it done.

[@longtalljay]

Kudos!

[@RenardGarzaro]

The 14th Amendment was for the slaves not immigrants. "Under the jurisdiction thereof" is a phrase that appears in the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. It means that all people born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens of the United States. The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States originally meant people under U.S. sovereign authority. This included everyone within U.S. territory, with the exception of foreign diplomats, foreign armies, and native tribes. The slaves were under the jurisdiction, immigrants are not.

[@tonychessma229]

The report disnt say a word about the foundation of US consitution. Its not just simply words. The founding father recognized that in order for the constitution work, there must be some condition. The moral fiber of the society. If the society turns into corrupt in general then no words in the world can save the society as we have seen thru history without execption. Its true this proposal might have a uphill battle becasue of the plain words in constitution. But it is not without justificstiin cuz many have taken adavatage of this law. Not to.mwntion the governement has deliberally allowed tens of millions illegal into country .

[@spacebatstuckonearth8888]

Does India have birth right citizenship?

[@rajeswarikannan430]

Another law says if parents are US citizens then kids are too. So best for this to stay not the automatic by birth citizenship. Poeple from other countries just to give birth so their kdis are citizens. It is misused. India doenst allow a kid to be India if they come on visa and give birth in india.

[@stephenh3293]

If you think homeless people is a big crises in America now then just wait for this new law which will make homeless crises even bigger.

[@NURREDIN]

You people have OBVIOUSLY never read the Constitution. The part of the Constitution that guarantees citizenship is the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, also known as the Citizenship Clause, which states that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." It DOES NOT say that the parent must be a citizen.

[@RioGadde]

❤❤it’s excellent decision❤❤

[@xbxtbe]

Is that how America became America?

[@thetravelingfoodshow]

Other European countries should follow suit & only allow citizens to purchase land!💯✅️

[@googleGuy44]

Just so you know, yeah it's a privilege to be an American.

[@paulsherman1950]

Fair enough. You should either be a citizen or hold a green card.

[@Rayjack-m9o]

As a native born American Citizen who only knows one land one country In the 21st century things have changed Ending Birth Right Citizenship and Dual Citizenship is a Must in the U.S.A. to many people are confused and conflicted as to where their loyalties lie.

[@Brodeman08]

As long as you work hard to be a citizen then you can stay. That's what should be in place.

[@nirjharrajawat2222]

Doesn’t matter he end or he keeps it world to be a total different ball game in next 10 years.

[@anirbidroy5964]

She is correct, this will impact even legal non-permanent residents (e.g HB visa holders). Birthright citizenship will only apply if one parent is either a citizen or legal *permanent* resident(green card holder)

[@tipsjameel]

women who have less than 2 months until giving birth travel to America to give birth because of the citizenship benefits. Perhaps this practice should be addressed.

[@TheFlip8892]

Is this across the board including Europeans? 🤔

[@paulafranciscac2787]

It is a VERY different story. They came to work hard, not to demand financial help and to take advantage of the US welfare system at the expense of taxpayers.

[@amlovinglife]

Where you there then? Trump supporter

[@krishnaraju3165]

Put a condition - “ eligible for tax payer of atleast 5 years” !

[@Munster-1984]

Best decision...

[@judefelix6780]

DO WHAT YOU WANT; DON'T CARE.

[@moyamwanza9046]

😂😂😂I'm sensing a lot of emotion in this news report, that's probably why there's misinformation about what he really said

[@SG003]

Why one guy have to decide everything, last time I checked they have something equivalent to parliament

[@Ann-George]

Palki's news credibility has long gone

[@Sdsisdsi]

Trump - ACTION_VEER Modi - BHASHAN_VEER

[@jahangirkhan9803]

Why Indians going there, you have super power India vishvaguru 😂😂

[@rajeshx1983]

India retains brain drain ans make super power in bharat 😂😂😂

[@ngoakopiet978]

That's why I love Trump,all presidents must follow suite

[@lvioland23]

Why does the world expect so much from the US? Take some folks from us, we have enough!!!! If you complain, we will ship them to you!

[@msdolly6101981]

Stop pushing your dollar into others. Stop threatening others with sanctions. Stop messing the world with your wars. Nobody expects much from you. Only this much

[@millennialmind9507]

No sane democracy denies birth based citizenship right

[@ERNESTORUIZ-hq4qg]

Immigrants seeking asylum in the USA it's ascites the limit over the full limit usa it's very crowded with migrants crisis

[@dedollarizer]

The fact that this is being discussed by an Indian news channel shows how much this thing gets misused.

[@VDutch-l9z]

Basically, what he's saying is there's no sex in the champagne room.

[@yieudiii8334]

No ko creo tiene k cambiar la constitucion

[@monkunal]

Miss information

[@marisolchanortiz1621]

yes he can,it’s in our constitution

[@MarkandeyaBP-l9v]

Yes he can! And he will

[@kimobrien.]

United States v. Wong Kim Ark A Supreme Court ruling has already made birthright citizenship the law of the land.

[@AB_NYC]

How far is he going back?

[@patrickodonnell9388]

He can because if people would just read the constitution it never said what people where told its implying that you are if your not subject to other political jurisdiction i.e not under other governments rule if so then you are a citizen if born here if your parents are not a citizen first from other country's or state.

[@abhijitagaonkar1730]

But he is doing the right thing man he has to protect his country there many ppl who will have children there just for the sake of citizenship so being a indian iam telling if they are misusing the rights its better to end it

[@idontknowmuch3441]

0:46 they didn’t have commercial fligts in 1885 how did they mess that up

[@Vijay-wr2bv]

Your reporting is out of context - he is referring to birthright citizenship rules relating to Illegal immigrants. Anything illegal is illegal - just a simple common sense.

[@primal1233]

I don't think this is going to be able to get through. A lot of politicians are going to oppose this

[@iamkishansuthar]

Dunky wale ayea road pe😂😂