Good stuff. One critical thing I might add...in the clips from the Mission it was conceivable that what we were seeing in the background was the sun (or my eyes read it that way), albeit at the perfect angle. With your shot, it had the appearance that the sun was in the middle of the trees. I wonder if you have sneaked it up to the top of the window if it would lessen that effect and make it all feel a little more believable.
@rogrdotnet3 күн бұрын
I had exactly the same thought
@CurrenSheldon3 күн бұрын
Great thought - I guess if you don't know how long these interviews usually take (as a normal viewer), you might assume that's the sun. Good thought on getting it up into the sky.
@coffeewithdamian2 күн бұрын
Great breakout! I love it! I would probably go slight lower on back (hair light) as it looks slightly unnatural, but it is personal preference. Thank you for a great advice!
@skyscraperphilosopher847619 сағат бұрын
Did you use any promist filter or similar on your lens? I was not expecting that window light to do much, but it actually worked great. Just discovered your channel and must say I'm very impressed! Quality content
@CurrenSheldon19 сағат бұрын
Thanks for the kind words and thanks for watching! Nope - no pro mist at all, though that may give it an even dreamier look than we have here.
@skyscraperphilosopher847618 сағат бұрын
@@CurrenSheldon thanks for reply! One more thing - do you remember roughly what aperture you were at here for the a cam?
@CurrenSheldon18 сағат бұрын
@@skyscraperphilosopher8476 Yep! Since I had the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 on there, my guess is that I had it speedboosted on the C70 and opened all the way up to f2, maaaaaybe f2.8.
@skyscraperphilosopher847618 сағат бұрын
@@CurrenSheldon great! I'm just getting into cinematography and want to recreate a setup like this in Norway. I got a couple Arri 2K tungsten fresnels for cheap and was thinking of using one of them for window light. Do you think this scene here would work if you used warm tungsten light from the window instead of daylight?
@PakshiMedia3 күн бұрын
Just purchased the course.
@CurrenSheldon18 сағат бұрын
Thanks so much! Looking forward to seeing you in there.
@PakshiMedia3 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@CurrenSheldon18 сағат бұрын
You got it!
@robwalker72454 күн бұрын
your course link is broken!!
@CurrenSheldon4 күн бұрын
Thanks so much! Just updated it: www.currensheldoncinematography.com/
@likelovehahawowКүн бұрын
13:26 just to be clear, you zoomed to crop but this did NOT create compression. Zooming just changes the angle of view which is what a focal length is all about. Compression only happens if you move the camera (essentially to maintain the size of the subject in the frame - think zolly) and then you’re experiencing the parallax effect that different focal lengths exhibit on the background when the position relative to the subject changes to maintain its size in frame. Without moving the camera, zooming (changing focal length) doesn’t compress anything (making the background appear farther or closer to the subject)
@CurrenSheldon18 сағат бұрын
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 🤔- pretty sure changing your focal length, whether by switching out a prime lens OR zooming to a different focal length will change the compression. You've described just cropping in on the sensor or cropping in during post production - which would not change the compression of the lens. But, if zooming doesn't change the compression, that would mean there would be no difference in compression at the wide end to the tele end of a 100-400mm lens, which is definitely not true.