Tudor vs Breitling - Round 3 (Black Bay Pro or Avenger?)

Рет қаралды 5,270

Brent Miller Time

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер

@DanielDahl-i9p 9 ай бұрын

Breitling. Avenger line is severely underrated

@MiguelAngelMorenoValiente 5 ай бұрын

Precios por favor

@laazdev Күн бұрын

@@MiguelAngelMorenoValientelo dijo a las 3:50

@Motibreva 6 ай бұрын

I have a Tudor and a Breitling Avenger. The Breitling has much better finishing than the Tudor, a more comfortable bracelet, much better micro adjust system (easier to use and twice the range of the Tudor). Both have COSC certified movements, only the Breitling is cheaper and quicker to service than the Tudor. That’s a win for me. Power reserve? If you’re wearing the watch it doesn’t matter. If you’re not - why did you buy it?

@robertlock6041 9 ай бұрын

The Pro is THE BUSINESS guys... That movement is excellent, and far superior to a breathed on SW330.1. From a personal perspective, the Pro fits my wrist better than any 52mm long watch, and so by any standards the Pro is a better purchase, not withstanding the case proportions, which are ameliorated to a large extent by the T-Fit clasp. Have a good weekend folks 🍻

@laazdev Күн бұрын

Better in what way, m9re durable, more accurate?

@robertlock6041 17 сағат бұрын

@laazdev Durability an unknown, but will probably depend on quality of maintenance. Most decent quality mechanical movements seem to last as long as their owners want. The Kenissi movements are increasingly moving towards METAS status. The MT5652 in my GMT 41mm is astonishingly accurate, and other owners have found the same. Sellita makes good movements, but the traveller GMT calibres from Kenissi are truly excellent.

@LCRider13 2 ай бұрын

I have owned both. I still own the Avenger.

@dire67 9 ай бұрын

For size and looks, I'm on team Breitling. For GMT functionality, it's Tudor, all day.

@richardlocke7264 21 күн бұрын

Traveler GMTs are a pain in the ass to set the date (No quickset date, date set by hour hand) plus who wants to travel with an expensive watch. Office GMTs much more practical for most people. I do however like the looks of the Tudor BB Pro.

@BRMIV 9 ай бұрын

I'm going with the Tudor for this round-both look great, but the Tudor has the better movement (power reserve, jumping hour hand) and comes in at a more reasonable size. Thanks for the comparison!

@laazdev Күн бұрын

How often would you change the GMT hour, probably once, when you first get the watch lol😂

@jdmtl1041 9 ай бұрын

Tudor all the way !!! Your king 👑

@briarsmoke6046 9 ай бұрын

Avenger for me. Much better looking watch, size is better for me (6’3” 250, 7 1/2 wrist), and it’s just a sportier looking watch.

@georgetown8986 2 ай бұрын

Great review. You are correct a Tudor GMT Pepsi would be a little better comparison from a functionality perspective. In that comparison, I much prefer the Tudor GMT Pepsi over the Avenger. In this comparison, perhaps the Avenger. Although I tend to think Tudor's build quality trumps Breitling's overall. Identical to Rolex.

@jimdangle8261 Ай бұрын

Avenger, no contest for me

@HishamElfiki 8 ай бұрын

Absolutely Brilliant Cheers Thank you so much for sharing Kind regards Tudor black bay 41mm GMT OPALINE DIAL one of the most beautiful watches that money can buy My favorite watches Rolex Submariner 124060 and Tudor black bay 41mm Harrods special edition

@brentmillertime8778 8 ай бұрын

Thanks for viewing!

@HishamElfiki 8 ай бұрын

@@brentmillertime8778 Cheers

@emmanueltsI5 9 ай бұрын

Tudor Pro for sure. Breitling should offer some 39mm watches too in the near future..

@maitrehg 4 ай бұрын

Breitling : better size for men.

@BennyLlama 9 ай бұрын

Hey, great video. Would it be possible to combine all the parts of these videos and publish them after the final part is released. I would greatly prefer to watch one larger episode than 4-5 shorter ones over the course of several weeks.

@brentmillertime8778 9 ай бұрын

Will see what I can do. Right now, I'm a one man band and typically delete content off my phone after upload and may not be able to get the older videos back. I'll keep in mind for similar future content as well.

@BennyLlama 9 ай бұрын

@brentmillertime8778 That would be great if you could. For a one man band, you're doing very well imo

@nero8484 6 ай бұрын

Without the wings on the Breitling something is wrong...🤷🏻‍♂️

@fredtafel 9 ай бұрын

Tudor for sure

@pasch_ 8 ай бұрын

I need a white dial BB Pro.

@didierjacobs6558 2 ай бұрын

Avenger all day.

@arist8989 23 күн бұрын

BOTH? but Breitling is more on my size preference, but Tudor movements 72hrs compare to 42hrs, thats the only downside of B

@brentmillertime8778 22 күн бұрын

Both is always correct.

@arist8989 9 күн бұрын

@brentmillertime8778 happy to owned that Avenger Automatic GMT 44, since i am more into diving, it has 300m wterproof (6876_24)

@simonskoglund4790 8 ай бұрын

Can’t pick one, I want both lol

@DWilliam1 9 ай бұрын

I like both Tudor and Breitling but neither of these models. The Tudor has the better movement but is not a good looking watch that’s too thick and with a terrible bracelet. The Avenger is just too large and somewhat boring.

@laazdev Күн бұрын

All these complaints about the GMT hand and I bet none of you would use it more than twice a year

@brentmillertime8778 10 сағат бұрын

Haha, probably right.

@simonwright6882 9 ай бұрын

Definitely the pro. Brightling not my bag unless it's the navitimer or Premier.

@astrostl 9 ай бұрын

Tudor. Breitling is too busy IMO.

@Anonymouslyme1 9 ай бұрын

Easy win for the Tudor, a better movement and a cheaper watch.

@Stona999 9 ай бұрын

I personally would take the Breitling. The Tutor is so boring looking to me and I really dislike Tutor bracelets.

@robertmccluskie8327 7 ай бұрын

Thdor need to introduce bigger eatchrd.

@dannyg6592 8 ай бұрын

Tudor for the win!

@1000lightyrs 9 ай бұрын

I'd definitely take the Breitling out of these two, I love it! That being said, the BB Pro is also calling my name, there's something about it. I think it reminds me of the old North Flag. I even like the chunky look of it.