TURN OFF THE CAMERA AND WALK AWAY NOPE id refusal first amendment audit

Рет қаралды 8,912

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 31

@masbigdaddy3846 Ай бұрын

How does the First Amendment protect public employees? The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

@Mr5-IDRefusal Ай бұрын

Curious how it applies to public employees' speech? What do you think?

@dlmullins9054 Ай бұрын

They are supposed to keep the peace, and all they should have done is educate the security guards and let them know for future reference, you have the right to do what you are doing. Their ego prevents them from it. That is not only unprofessional, but also very sad for our freedom and those who are hired to protect it.

@paulmonin5215 Ай бұрын

Too many self entitled public taxpayer LIABILITIES?

@vernontoole3539 Ай бұрын

Do you know it's shameful half of the cops don't even know the five elements of the Constitution first amendment 🤔😲😟

@michaelwaddell9461 Ай бұрын

All public employees and all law enforcement employees and all judges should be required to take continuing education classes on local and Constitutional law. Period.

@davidking6391 Ай бұрын

If there is personal information available to see surely it's up to the DMV to keep it private. You could go in there without a camera and still see and hear it.

@masbigdaddy3846 Ай бұрын

I was trying to gather intelligence until you showed up. 🚔

@geraldgroomes5527 Ай бұрын

Lol

@ronniekeith9046 Ай бұрын

EXCELLENT JOB VIDEOGRAPHER.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IF DETAINED.............FILE THE FEDERAL COURT LAWSUIT.........THE SECURITY COMPANY GETS SUED.....MARERA (GUY COP) MARCIA(WOMAN COP)

@kishintuchis7076 Ай бұрын

WHENEVER A COP OR SECURITY GUARD , OR ANYONE FOR THAT MATTER , TELLS AN AUDITOR WHAT THEY CAN OR CANT VIDEO FROM A PUBLIC PLACE THE AUDITOR MUST REMIND THEM THAT HE CAN LEGALLY VIDEO ANYTHING THAT HIS EYES CAN SEE . AND THAT IF PEOPLE DONT WANT SOMETHING TO BE VIDEOD' IT IS UP TO THEM ALONE TO KEEP OUT OF SIGHT

@chaztitan6457 Ай бұрын

talk about stereotypes.... why is it that government employees look like they are either paid to do jack crap, or on welfare. AND over weight..... like really?

@masbigdaddy3846 Ай бұрын

🤠 Just imagine how many lives you've saved by keeping these a-holes busy. 😎

@masbigdaddy3846 Ай бұрын

What is the balancing test courts use to decide these cases? Once a plaintiff states a claim for unlawful retaliation, a court must decide if "the interest of the employee as a citizen, in commenting on matters of public concern, outweighs the employer's interest in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees." Courts have to make this decision after weighing the facts of each particular case. Some balancing factors for a court to consider include whether: the statement impairs discipline by superiors or harmony among coworkers, the statement has a detrimental impact on close working relationships for which personal loyalty and confidence are necessary, and whether the speech in question interferes with the normal operation of the employer's business

@edithaldineeugenio9262 Ай бұрын

Other auditors should do a follow up audit here.

@ronaldneehao9723 Ай бұрын

The security looks like sumo wrestling people

@mrsmarsh6619 Ай бұрын

😮

@noelmckie Ай бұрын

📹📽🎥📷📸🚔🚓🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿👀

@67L48 Ай бұрын

Sheets v. City of Punta Gorda (2019), as one example. Courts routinely find that the insides of public buildings do NOT afford the same broad protections of first amendment activities, even in otherwise unrestricted areas. The courts generally recognize that public government buildings with unrestricted access to the public do, in fact, have specific purposes for their existences ... and, therefore, have a lawful ability to restrict certain behaviors that would distract from conducting those specific purposes. Hate that all you want, but it's not as simple as merely saying, "Public Building + 1A = You Can't Tell Me No." It's more complicated than that.

@siriosstar4789 Ай бұрын

If you want to eliminate auditors then , ENCOURAGE public filming of police , the government businesses and the public ., but more than that i encourage those being filmed to accept it 100% . invite auditors in and provide refreshments and chat them up for as long as they wish . why do i advocate this? because no one will watch a video of people inviting those with cameras to film all they want with zero resistance. the auditors would become bored and their content would put people to sleep . the subscribers would become unsubscribed in short order . encourage filming everywhere !