Typescript Function Overloading - Is It Good Enough?

[@MonsterlessonsAcademy]

WATCH NEXT: Typescript Interview Questions and Answers - Dominate Your Next Interview - kzbin.info/www/bejne/aqHUlqJ-gctsf7csi=2gqvcpDDDDRorNpX

[@nick.h7566]

Honestly if I wanted to save space in the params I think I'd just add a type property above and apply within there what I expect the function can use or return. But damn I love your videos!

[@MonsterlessonsAcademy]

Thank you!

[@ivelintodorov6075]

Good to know, but not really usable. Even if you have the overloads you still have to implicitly check what is the parameter type.

[@MonsterlessonsAcademy]

Agreed!

[@juanmacias5922]

I'd probably just use the non-overloading version, I think it looks simpler lol

[@MonsterlessonsAcademy]

Exactly. Most of the time I don't want to see this.

[@MrKOHKyPEHT]

Looks like just syntax sugar :Ъ

[@MonsterlessonsAcademy]

Yeap